DOCSLIB.ORG

Regional Variation in Demography, Distribution, Foraging, and Strategic Conservation of Lesser Prairie-Chickens in Kansas and Colorado

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Regional Variation in Demography, Distribution, Foraging, and Strategic Conservation of Lesser Prairie-Chickens in Kansas and Colorado Regional variation in demography, distribution, foraging, and strategic conservation of lesser prairie-chickens in Kansas and Colorado by Daniel S. Sullins B.S., Texas A&M University, 2008 M.S., Stephen F. Austin State University 2013 AN ABSTRACT OF A DISSERTATION submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Division of Biology College of Arts and Sciences KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2017 Abstract The lesser prairie-chicken (Tympanuchus pallidicinctus) is 1 of 3 prairie-grouse species in North America. Prairie-grouse have undergone local or widespread declines due to a loss of habitat through conversion to row crop agriculture, anthropogenic development, and alteration of ecological drivers that maintain quality grasslands. For lesser prairie-chickens, habitat loss and declines were deemed significant for listing as threatened under the Endangered Species Act in 2014. Despite a judge vacating the listing decision in 2015, the lesser prairie-chicken remains a species of concern. Conservation plans are currently being implemented and developed. To maximize the effectiveness of efforts, knowledge of the distribution of lesser prairie-chickens, regional demography, foods used during critical life-stages, and where to prioritize management is needed. To guide future conservation efforts with empirical evidence, I captured, marked with transmitters, and monitored female lesser prairie-chickens in Kansas and Colorado during 2013– 2016 (n =307). I used location data to predict the distribution of habitat. Encounter data from individuals were used to estimate vital rates and integrated into a matrix population model to estimate population growth rates (λ). The matrix model was then decomposed to identify life- stages that exert the greatest influence on λ and vital rate contributions to differences in λ among sites. After assessing demography, I examined the diet of adults and chicks during critical brood rearing and winter periods using a fecal DNA metabarcoding approach. Overall, potential habitat appears to compromise ~30% of the presumed lesser prairie- chicken range in Kansas with most habitat in the Mixed-Grass Prairie Ecoregion. Within occupied sites, populations were most sensitive to factors during the first year of life (chick and juvenile survival), however, the persistence of populations through drought may rely on adult survival. Among regional populations, breeding season, nest, and nonbreeding season survival rates contributed most to differences in λ among sites, breeding season survival contributed to differences in λ among more and less fragmented sites. During critical life-stages, diets were comprised of arthropod and plant foods. Among 80 readable fecal samples, 35% of the sequences were likely from Lepidoptera, 26% from Orthoptera, 14% from Araneae, and 13% from Hemiptera. Plant sequences from 137 fecal samples were comprised of genera similar to Ambrosia (27%) Latuca or Taraxacum (10%), Medicago (6%), and Triticum (5%). Among cover types, lesser prairie-chickens using native grasslands consumed a greater diversity of foods. Last, promising conservation options include the conversion of cropland to grassland through the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) and tree removal in mixed-grass prairie landscapes. Lesser prairie-chickens mostly used CRP during nesting and the nonbreeding season, during drier periods, and in drier portions of their distribution. Strategic CRP sign-up and tree removal could recover >60,000 ha and~100,000 ha of habitat respectively. In summary, conservation that targets management in areas within broad scale habitat constraints predicted will be most beneficial. In areas occupied by lesser prairie-chickens, management that increases brood survival in large grasslands having optimal nesting structure will elicit the strongest influence on population growth and will likely be the most resilient to stochastic drought-related effects. Regional variation in demography, distribution, foraging, and strategic conservation of lesser prairie-chickens in Kansas and Colorado by Daniel S. Sullins B.S., Texas A&M University, 2008 M.S., Stephen F. Austin State University 2013 A DISSERTATION submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Division of Biology College of Arts and Sciences KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2017 Approved by: Major Professor David A. Haukos Copyright © Daniel Sullins 2017. Abstract The lesser prairie-chicken (Tympanuchus pallidicinctus) is 1 of 3 prairie-grouse species in North America. Prairie-grouse have undergone local or widespread declines due to a loss of habitat through conversion to row crop agriculture, anthropogenic development, and alteration of ecological drivers that maintain quality grasslands. For lesser prairie-chickens, habitat loss and declines were deemed significant for listing as threatened under the Endangered Species Act in 2014. Despite a judge vacating the listing decision in 2015, the lesser prairie-chicken remains a species of concern. Conservation plans are currently being implemented and developed. To maximize the effectiveness of efforts, knowledge of the distribution of lesser prairie-chickens, regional demography, foods used during critical life-stages, and where to prioritize management is needed. To guide future conservation efforts with empirical evidence, I captured, marked with transmitters, and monitored female lesser prairie-chickens in Kansas and Colorado during 2013– 2016 (n =307). I used location data to predict the distribution of habitat. Encounter data from individuals were used to estimate vital rates and integrated into a matrix population model to estimate population growth rates (λ). The matrix model was then decomposed to identify life- stages that exert the greatest influence on λ and vital rate contributions to differences in λ among sites. After assessing demography, I examined the diet of adults and chicks during critical brood rearing and winter periods using a fecal DNA metabarcoding approach. Overall, potential habitat appears to compromise ~30% of the presumed lesser prairie- chicken range in Kansas with most habitat in the Mixed-Grass Prairie Ecoregion. Within occupied sites, populations were most sensitive to factors during the first year of life (chick and juvenile survival), however, the persistence of populations through drought may rely on adult survival. Among regional populations, breeding season, nest, and nonbreeding season survival rates contributed most to differences in λ among sites, breeding season survival contributed to differences in λ among more and less fragmented sites. During critical life-stages, diets were comprised of arthropod and plant foods. Among 80 readable fecal samples, 35% of the sequences were likely from Lepidoptera, 26% from Orthoptera, 14% from Araneae, and 13% from Hemiptera. Plant sequences from 137 fecal samples were comprised of genera similar to Ambrosia (27%) Latuca or Taraxacum (10%), Medicago (6%), and Triticum (5%). Among cover types, lesser prairie-chickens using native grasslands consumed a greater diversity of foods. Last, promising conservation options include the conversion of cropland to grassland through the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) and tree removal in mixed-grass prairie landscapes. Lesser prairie-chickens mostly used CRP during nesting and the nonbreeding season, during drier periods, and in drier portions of their distribution. Strategic CRP sign-up and tree removal could recover >60,000 ha and~100,000 ha of habitat respectively. In summary, conservation that targets management in areas within broad scale habitat constraints predicted will be most beneficial. In areas occupied by lesser prairie-chickens, management that increases brood survival in large grasslands having optimal nesting structure will elicit the strongest influence on population growth and will likely be the most resilient to stochastic drought-related effects. Table of Contents List of Figures .............................................................................................................................. xiv List of Tables ............................................................................................................................... xxi Acknowledgments...................................................................................................................... xxvi Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Literature Cited ............................................................................................................... 6 Chapter 1 - Regional Variation in Lesser Prairie-Chicken Demography in Kansas and Colorado ............................................................................................................................................... 10 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 10 Methods ........................................................................................................................ 15 Study Area ................................................................................................................ 15 Capture and Vital Rate Data Collection .................................................................... 19 Fecundity Parameters ...............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Poaceae) De México Species Richness, Classification and a Checklist of the Grasses (Poaceae) of Mexico
    Artículo de investigación Riqueza de especies, clasificación y listado de las gramíneas (Poaceae) de México Species richness, classification and a checklist of the grasses (Poaceae) of Mexico J. Gabriel Sánchez-Ken Resumen: Antecedentes y Objetivos: En 2006 se dio a conocer el catálogo de las gramíneas de México, pero desde entonces tanto la clasificación como la apa- rición de especies nuevas cambiaron las cifras de esta familia en México y en el mundo. El objetivo principal de este estudio fue actualizar la lista de taxa en México, reuniendo el mayor número posible de bases de datos en línea. Otros objetivos incluyeron la comparación de la riqueza de especies de la familia Poaceae entre los países con mayor diversidad, así como analizar la riqueza de sus taxa a nivel estatal y por categorías taxonómicas. Métodos: Se consultaron bases de datos en línea, tanto nacionales como extranjeras, que incluían ejemplares de referencia de México, se descarga- ron y se curaron, además de una confirmación visual de la identidad de un gran porcentaje de ejemplares. Se extrajeron los nombres de las especies, estados donde fueron colectadas y los acrónimos de los herbarios. La base resultante se complementó solo con bibliografía a partir de 2006 y la no incluida en el catálogo que mostraba ejemplares de respaldo. Resultados clave: Se revisaron 227,973 registros que contabilizaron, en total, 1416 taxa, que incluyen 215 géneros, 1312 especies y 214 categorías infraespecíficas. Del total de especies, 1092 se consideran nativas y 224 introducidas (cultivadas y/o malezas). Las especies endémicas de México son 304 (27.83%) o 311 (28.10%) si se consideran categorías inferiores.
    [Show full text]
  • Conocimiento Taxonómico De La Familia Poaceae En México
    Taxonomía y Florística Conocimiento taxonómico de la familia Poaceae en México PATRICIA DÁVILA1*, MA. TERESA MEJIA-SAULÉS2, ANA MARÍA SORIANO- MARTÍNEZ3 Y YOLANDA HERRERA-ARRIETA4 Botanical Sciences 96 (3): 462-514, 2018 Resumen Antecedentes La clasificación de la familia Poaceae ha cambiado a lo largo de los años, por la evolución DOI: 10.17129/botsci.1894 de distintas áreas del conocimiento de la sistemática, tanto en sus aspectos teóricos como prácticos. La Received: morfología y anatomía siguen siendo fuentes importantes de información taxonómica en las gramíneas. October 18th, 2017 Sin embargo, en los últimos 20 años, los trabajos moleculares que buscan inferir la filogenia de los dife- Accepted: rentes taxa, han dominado el escenario de la sistemática de la familia, lo que ha derivado en cambios y April 21st, 2018 re-arreglos a todos los niveles taxonómicos. Editor asociado: Objetivo: Realizar la revisión y actualización de la información taxonómica y geográfica de las Poaceae Guillermo Ibarra-Manriquez de México, presentando un listado de especies, en el que se señalan los taxa nativos, introducidos y endé- micos, los logros alcanzados en el conocimiento del grupo, así como los retos que se habrán de enfrentar en el futuro para adelantar en el conocimiento de las gramíneas de México. Métodos: Se tomó como base de referencia el trabajo de Dávila et al. (2006). Se revisó tanto la literatura especializada disponible de 2006 a la fecha y distintas bases de datos nomenclaturales y taxonómicas. El trabajo también incluye la revisión de ejemplares de 29 herbarios entre 2006-2017. La lista de las especies se presenta con base en la clasificación de Soreng et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Univeróijaj Je (Juajafa¡Áiia
    1985-2 REG. No. 78410167 ,UniveróiJaJ Je (juaJafa¡áiia t S FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS . ~ ···- ... ·-· /~ ·. •'·-"' .. · REVISION BIBLIOGRAFICA COMENTADA SOBRE LAS GRAMIHEAS MEXICANAS ( FLORISTICA • TAXONOMICA ) TESIS PROFESIONAL QUE PARA OBTENER EL TITULO DE: LICENCIADO EN BIOLOGIA P R E· S E N T A P. BIOL. ·: ALICIA LOEZA CORlCHI GUADALAJARA, JAL. NOVIEMBRE 1989 ,AtiOfU!TORIO tJOSilUE u. PRUIAYERA CEfilRO DE OOCtlll(nACIOIIl i AGRADECIMIENTOS Quiero hacer patente mi más profundo agradecimiento al Ing. Rafael Guzmán Mejía y al Bibl. Armando Butanda Cervera, quienes ayudaron enormemente en la concepción y diseño del trabajo. Y muy en especial al Bibl. Armando Butanda, ya que no sólo aportó ideas y esfuerzos para la búsqueda de citas y revisión de literatura en la elaboración del presente trabajo, sino que también contribuyó de manera nuy importante en la revisión del mismo. A la Dra. Patricia Dávila, por haberme facilitado un listado personal de bibliografía selecta sobre la familia Gramineae, basado principalmente en la literatura donada por el Dr. A.A. Beetle para la biblioteca de COTECOCA. Al Ing. Ricardo Flores Martínez por su valiosa ayuda en el diseño, análisis de la base de datos así como en el manejo de los mismos, además de la elaboración de los índices aquí presentados. Al Laboratorio Natural Las Joyas de La Sierra de Manantlán y al personal que ahí labora, por brindarme las facilidades logísticas para la elaboración del trabajo en el Area de Informática. Y al personal del Area de Informática de Casa Hidalgo (U D G) por las facilidades brindadas. Al M.C. Eduardo Santana Castellón, Dr. Bruce Benz, Ing.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification and Biogeography of Panicoideae (Poaceae) in the New World Fernando O
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Scholarship@Claremont Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 23 | Issue 1 Article 39 2007 Classification and Biogeography of Panicoideae (Poaceae) in the New World Fernando O. Zuloaga Instituto de Botánica Darwinion, San Isidro, Argentina Osvaldo Morrone Instituto de Botánica Darwinion, San Isidro, Argentina Gerrit Davidse Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis Susan J. Pennington National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Botany Commons, and the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Zuloaga, Fernando O.; Morrone, Osvaldo; Davidse, Gerrit; and Pennington, Susan J. (2007) "Classification and Biogeography of Panicoideae (Poaceae) in the New World," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 23: Iss. 1, Article 39. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol23/iss1/39 Aliso 23, pp. 503–529 ᭧ 2007, Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden CLASSIFICATION AND BIOGEOGRAPHY OF PANICOIDEAE (POACEAE) IN THE NEW WORLD FERNANDO O. ZULOAGA,1,5 OSVALDO MORRONE,1,2 GERRIT DAVIDSE,3 AND SUSAN J. PENNINGTON4 1Instituto de Bota´nica Darwinion, Casilla de Correo 22, Labarde´n 200, San Isidro, B1642HYD, Argentina; 2([email protected]); 3Missouri Botanical Garden, PO Box 299, St. Louis, Missouri 63166, USA ([email protected]); 4Department of Botany, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20013-7012, USA ([email protected]) 5Corresponding author ([email protected]) ABSTRACT Panicoideae (Poaceae) in the New World comprise 107 genera (86 native) and 1357 species (1248 native).
    [Show full text]
  • Guadalupe Mountains, New Mexico and Texas
    INVENTORY OF THE FLORA OF THE GUADALUPE MOUNTAINS, NEW MEXICO AND TEXAS [SECOND WORKING DRAFT] [MARCH, 2002] Compiled by: Richard D. Worthington, Ph.D. Floristic Inventories of the Southwest Program P. O. Box 13331 El Paso, Texas 79913 El Paso, Texas March, 2002 INVENTORY OF THE FLORA OF THE GUADALUPE MOUNTAINS, NEW MEXICO AND TEXAS INTRODUCTION This report is a second working draft of the inventory of the flora of the Guadalupe Mountains, Eddy and Otero Cos., New Mexico and Culberson Co., Texas. I have drawn on inventory work I have done in the Sitting Bull Falls and Last Chance Canyon area of the mountains and a survey project at Manzanita Springs carried out over the past several years as well as collections made during survey work on two projects completed in 1999 (Worthington 1999a, 1999b). I have included in this report a review of almost all of the literature that deals with the flora of the study area. The goals of this project are to provide as nearly a complete inventory as possible of the flora of the Guadalupe Mts. which includes cryptogams (lichens, mosses, liverworts), to provide a nearly complete review of the literature that references the study area flora, to document where the voucher specimens are located, and to reconstruct a history of collecting efforts made in the region. Each of these activities demands a certain amount of time. Several more years of field work are contemplated. On-line resources have yet to be evaluated. The compiler of this report welcomes any assistance especially in the form of additions and corrections.
    [Show full text]
  • James H. Locklear Lauritzen Gardens 100 Bancroft Street Omaha, Nebraska 68108, U.S.A
    ENDEMIC PLANTS OF THE CENTRAL GRASSLAND OF NORTH AMERICA: DISTRIBUTION, ECOLOGY, AND CONSERVATION STATUS James H. Locklear Lauritzen Gardens 100 Bancroft Street Omaha, Nebraska 68108, U.S.A. [email protected] ABSTRACT This paper enumerates the endemic plants of the Central Grassland of North America. The Central Grassland encompasses the full extent of the tallgrass, mixed-grass, and shortgrass prairie ecological systems of North America plus floristically related plant communities that adjoin and/or interdigitate with the midcontinental grasslands including savanna-open woodland systems, shrub-steppe, and rock outcrop communities. There are 382 plant taxa endemic to the Central Grassland, 300 endemic species (eight of which have multiple subspecific taxa endemic to the region) and 72 endemic subspecies/varieties of more widely distributed species. Nine regional concentrations of en- demic taxa were identified and are described as centers of endemism for the Central Grassland: Arkansas Valley Barrens, Edwards Plateau, Llano Estacado Escarpments, Llano Uplift, Mescalero-Monahans Dunes, Niobrara-Platte Tablelands, Raton Tablelands, Red Bed Plains, and Reverchon Rocklands. In addition to hosting localized endemics, these areas are typically enriched with more widely-distributed Central Grassland endemics as well as peripheral or disjunct occurrences of locally-rare taxa, making them regions of high floristic diversity for the Central Grassland. Most of the endemics (299 or 78%) are habitat specialists, associated with rock outcrop, sand, hydric, or riparian habi- tats. There is a strong correlation between geology and endemism in the Central Grassland, with 59% of the endemics (225 taxa) associated with rock outcrop habitat. Of the 382 Central Grassland endemics, 124 or 33% are of conservation concern (NatureServe ranking of G1/T1 to G3/T3).
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Classification and Mapping at Niobrara National
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Vegetation Classification and Mapping Niobrara National Scenic River Natural Resource Report NPS/NIOB/NRR—2019/2040 ON THIS PAGE Herd of bison on The Niobrara Preserve (Matt Ley, CEMML) ON THE COVER Niobrara River near Norden Bridge (Tom Baldvins, CNHP) Vegetation Classification and Mapping Niobrara National Scenic River Natural Resource Report NPS/NIOB/NRR—2019/2040 1 2 1 2 2 Tom Baldvins , Matt Ley , Joe Stevens , David Jones , Hannah Pilkington 1Colorado Natural Heritage Program Warner College of Natural Resources Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado 2Center for Environmental Management of Military Lands Warner College of Natural Resources Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado November 2019 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service. The series supports the advancement of science, informed decision-making, and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series also provides a forum for presenting more lengthy results that may not be accepted by publications with page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Vascular Plants in the Sandia and Manzano Mountains of Central New Mexico Robert C
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Occasional Papers Museum of Southwestern Biology 2-12-2007 Checklist of Vascular Plants in the Sandia and Manzano Mountains of Central New Mexico Robert C. Sivinski Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/occasionalpapers Recommended Citation Sivinski, Robert C.. "Checklist of Vascular Plants in the Sandia and Manzano Mountains of Central New Mexico." (2007). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/occasionalpapers/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Museum of Southwestern Biology at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Occasional Papers by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. OCCASIONAL PAPERS OF THE MUSEUM OF SOUTHWESTERN BIOLOGY NUMBER 10, pp. 1–67 12 February 2007 Checklist of Vascular Plants in the Sandia and Manzano Mountains of Central New Mexico ROBERT C. SIVINSKI1 ABSTRACT The flora of the central New Mexico range of mountains consisting of the Sandia, Manzanita and Manzano mountains is predominantly influenced by the southern Rocky Mountain regional flora, but also contains floristic elements from the adjacent Chihuahuan Desert, Great Plains and Colorado Plateau ecoregions. This vascular plant checklist documents 100 families, 454 genera, 798 native species, 108 exotic species, and 31 additional native infraspecific taxa for a total of 937 kinds of plants in the Sandia/Manzano range of mountains. Discussions of the local environment and climate, common plant associations, endemic and rare plants, exotic species, and plant collection history in this mountain range are included. INTRODUCTION The Sandia and Manzano range of mountains is the All of the common plants, and most of the uncommon most striking topographic feature of central New Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Great Plains Rapid Ecoregional Assessment—Pre-Assessment Report
    In cooperation with Bureau of Land Management Southern Great Plains Rapid Ecoregional Assessment—Pre-Assessment Report Open-File Report 2015–1003 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Front cover photographs: Shortgrass prairie in Comanche National Grassland, Colorado. (Photo courtesy of the U.S Forest Service) (Inset) Swift fox. (Photo courtesy of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) Back cover photograph: Black-tailed prairie dogs. (Photo by Dean Biggins, U.S. Geological Survey) Southern Great Plains Rapid Ecoregional Assessment—Pre-Assessment Report Edited by Timothy J. Assal, Cynthia P. Melcher, and Natasha B. Carr Open-File Report 2015–1003 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2015 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Suggested citation: Assal, T.J., Melcher, C.P., and Carr, N.B., eds., 2015, Southern Great Plains Rapid Ecoregional Assessment—Pre-assessment report: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2015– 1003, 284 p., http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/ofr20151003. ISSN 2331-1258 (online) Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Oklahoma
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 2017 An Annotated Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Oklahoma James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "An Annotated Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Oklahoma" (2017). Botanical Studies. 71. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/71 This Flora of Oklahoma is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF THE VASCULAR PLANTS OF OKLAHOMA James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State University Arcata, California Second Edition — 17 June 2017 Introduction. 1 List 1: Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Oklahoma. 2 List 2: Plant Families: Common Names to Technical Names . 65 List 3: Plants: Common Names to Generic and Family Names . 67 List 4: Endemic Plants. 79 List 5: Rare, Endangered, and Threatened Plants . 79 List 6: Weeds . 81 INTRODUCTION My purpose is to provide a reasonably complete and up-to-date list of the vascular plants known to occur in Oklahoma. By vascular plants, sometimes referred to as the higher plants, I mean lycophytes (fern allies), ferns, gymnosperms, and flowering plants. Plants are arranged alphabetically by family, then genus and species within these four major groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification and Biogeography of Panicoideae (Poaceae) in the New World Fernando O
    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 23 | Issue 1 Article 39 2007 Classification and Biogeography of Panicoideae (Poaceae) in the New World Fernando O. Zuloaga Instituto de Botánica Darwinion, San Isidro, Argentina Osvaldo Morrone Instituto de Botánica Darwinion, San Isidro, Argentina Gerrit Davidse Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis Susan J. Pennington National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Botany Commons, and the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Zuloaga, Fernando O.; Morrone, Osvaldo; Davidse, Gerrit; and Pennington, Susan J. (2007) "Classification and Biogeography of Panicoideae (Poaceae) in the New World," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 23: Iss. 1, Article 39. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol23/iss1/39 Aliso 23, pp. 503–529 ᭧ 2007, Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden CLASSIFICATION AND BIOGEOGRAPHY OF PANICOIDEAE (POACEAE) IN THE NEW WORLD FERNANDO O. ZULOAGA,1,5 OSVALDO MORRONE,1,2 GERRIT DAVIDSE,3 AND SUSAN J. PENNINGTON4 1Instituto de Bota´nica Darwinion, Casilla de Correo 22, Labarde´n 200, San Isidro, B1642HYD, Argentina; 2([email protected]); 3Missouri Botanical Garden, PO Box 299, St. Louis, Missouri 63166, USA ([email protected]); 4Department of Botany, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20013-7012, USA ([email protected]) 5Corresponding author ([email protected]) ABSTRACT Panicoideae (Poaceae) in the New World comprise 107 genera (86 native) and 1357 species (1248 native). As circumscribed herein, Panicoideae include eight tribes: Andropogoneae, Arundinelleae, Centotheceae, Gynerieae, Isachneae, Paniceae, Steyermarkochloeae, and Thysanolaeneae.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Vascular Plants In
    OCCASIONAL PAPERS OF THE MUSEUM OF SOUTHWESTERN BIOLOGY NUMBER 10, pp. 1–67 12 February 2007 Checklist of Vascular Plants in the Sandia and Manzano Mountains of Central New Mexico ROBERT C. SIVINSKI1 ABSTRACT The flora of the central New Mexico range of mountains consisting of the Sandia, Manzanita and Manzano mountains is predominantly influenced by the southern Rocky Mountain regional flora, but also contains floristic elements from the adjacent Chihuahuan Desert, Great Plains and Colorado Plateau ecoregions. This vascular plant checklist documents 100 families, 454 genera, 798 native species, 108 exotic species, and 31 additional native infraspecific taxa for a total of 937 kinds of plants in the Sandia/Manzano range of mountains. Discussions of the local environment and climate, common plant associations, endemic and rare plants, exotic species, and plant collection history in this mountain range are included. INTRODUCTION The Sandia and Manzano range of mountains is the All of the common plants, and most of the uncommon most striking topographic feature of central New Mexico. plants, in this area have been vouchered as specimens Nearly half of all New Mexicans can see this mountain and preserved in herbaria where they are accessible to range from their homes and many visit its forested peaks floristic and taxonomic researchers. Hopefully, this check- and canyons for outdoor recreation. Several illustrated list will inspire further botanical exploration in the field guides to New Mexico plants are commercially avail- Sandia/Manzano range of mountains to add the plants I able for those who want to know the flora, but these have been unable to document.
    [Show full text]