DOCSLIB.ORG

Polling by Sky News/Yougov

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

YouGov / Sky News Survey Results Sample Size: 871 Labour members in GB Fieldwork: 22nd - 29th June 2021 Age Group Gender EU Ref Vote Region 2020 Leadership Vote Rest Keir Rebecca 18- 25- 50- Leav Midlands / Lisa Total 65+ Male Female Remain London of North Scotland Starme Long- 24 49 64 e Wales Nandy South r Bailey Weighted Sample 871 35 209 366 261 496 375 727 86 157 248 170 261 35 515 159 102 Unweighted Sample 871 17 319 310 225 490 381 754 75 142 262 178 264 25 523 157 104 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % Do you think the following politicians are currently doing well or badly? Keir Starmer as Leader of the Labour Party Very well 10 4 10 11 10 10 11 10 13 6 11 10 12 18 15 3 3 Fairly well 45 26 33 46 55 44 47 47 38 49 48 48 35 64 55 12 52 TOTAL WELL 55 30 43 57 65 54 58 57 51 55 59 58 47 82 70 15 55 Fairly badly 24 29 34 21 20 25 24 24 24 27 25 23 25 11 23 21 32 Very badly 18 41 18 20 14 20 17 17 25 16 15 18 25 7 6 63 9 TOTAL BADLY 42 70 52 41 34 45 41 41 49 43 40 41 50 18 29 84 41 Don’t know 2 0 4 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 0 1 1 4 Lisa Nandy as Shadow Foreign Secretary Very well 21 11 16 21 26 20 21 21 19 17 20 19 25 22 22 8 41 Fairly well 47 55 41 49 47 48 46 48 43 44 47 52 45 42 52 34 48 TOTAL WELL 68 66 57 70 73 68 67 69 62 61 67 71 70 64 74 42 89 Fairly badly 10 10 11 9 11 13 8 9 24 14 9 12 8 16 7 22 8 Very badly 6 6 6 7 4 7 4 6 4 3 4 5 10 7 2 23 0 TOTAL BADLY 16 16 17 16 15 20 12 15 28 17 13 17 18 23 9 45 8 Don’t know 16 19 26 14 11 12 21 16 11 21 20 12 13 14 17 13 4 Rachel Reeves as Shadow Chancellor Very well 14 4 8 14 18 15 12 14 14 11 15 12 14 17 16 6 14 Fairly well 39 37 28 40 46 41 36 39 42 41 35 43 38 39 43 23 49 TOTAL WELL 53 41 36 54 64 56 48 53 56 52 50 55 52 56 59 29 63 Fairly badly 12 10 14 11 11 11 13 11 16 11 14 11 10 13 9 23 13 Very badly 7 11 7 8 6 10 4 7 9 7 4 7 11 8 2 27 2 TOTAL BADLY 19 21 21 19 17 21 17 18 25 18 18 18 21 21 11 50 15 Don’t know 29 37 43 27 19 24 36 29 19 30 32 27 27 23 30 21 22 1 © 2021 YouGov plc. All Rights Reserved www.yougov.co.uk Sample Size: 871 Labour members in GB Fieldwork: 22nd - 29th June 2021 Age Group Gender EU Ref Vote Region 2020 Leadership Vote Rest Keir Rebecca 18- 25- 50- Leav Midlands / Lisa Total 65+ Male Female Remain London of North Scotland Starme Long- 24 49 64 e Wales Nandy South r Bailey Weighted Sample 871 35 209 366 261 496 375 727 86 157 248 170 261 35 515 159 102 Unweighted Sample 871 17 319 310 225 490 381 754 75 142 262 178 264 25 523 157 104 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % Sadiq Khan as Mayor of London Very well 43 27 35 48 45 41 46 46 28 43 47 39 42 42 48 33 35 Fairly well 44 68 52 39 43 45 43 43 42 47 44 46 43 38 42 51 51 TOTAL WELL 87 95 87 87 88 86 89 89 70 90 91 85 85 80 90 84 86 Fairly badly 5 5 5 5 6 6 4 5 11 8 3 6 6 6 4 11 9 Very badly 2 0 2 3 2 3 1 1 15 1 2 5 2 3 1 3 3 TOTAL BADLY 7 5 7 8 8 9 5 6 26 9 5 11 8 9 5 14 12 Don’t know 5 0 6 5 4 4 7 5 5 1 4 4 8 11 5 2 3 Andy Burnham as Mayor of Greater Manchester Very well 70 61 62 72 74 67 74 71 63 67 68 66 76 71 74 61 68 Fairly well 24 39 31 21 22 27 21 24 24 28 26 26 20 19 21 37 27 TOTAL WELL 94 100 93 93 96 94 95 95 87 95 94 92 96 90 95 98 95 Fairly badly 2 0 2 2 2 2 1 2 4 3 1 0 2 6 2 1 2 Very badly 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 3 0 0 1 0 0 TOTAL BADLY 3 0 3 3 2 3 1 3 4 4 2 3 2 6 3 1 2 Don’t know 3 0 5 3 2 3 4 3 8 0 4 6 2 3 3 1 3 Angela Rayner as Deputy Leader of the Labour Party Very well 21 23 21 21 21 19 24 21 19 13 24 17 28 17 23 17 27 Fairly well 46 43 45 47 45 45 47 47 40 49 41 54 41 62 49 36 47 TOTAL WELL 67 66 66 68 66 64 71 68 59 62 65 71 69 79 72 53 74 Fairly badly 17 17 19 14 18 18 15 17 21 19 16 14 18 12 15 24 14 Very badly 6 5 4 8 5 8 3 5 6 6 5 8 6 3 3 18 2 TOTAL BADLY 23 22 23 22 23 26 18 22 27 25 21 22 24 15 18 42 16 Don’t know 10 12 11 10 11 10 11 10 14 13 15 8 6 5 10 5 9 2 © 2021 YouGov plc. All Rights Reserved www.yougov.co.uk Sample Size: 871 Labour members in GB Fieldwork: 22nd - 29th June 2021 Age Group Gender EU Ref Vote Region 2020 Leadership Vote Rest Keir Rebecca 18- 25- 50- Leav Midlands / Lisa Total 65+ Male Female Remain London of North Scotland Starme Long- 24 49 64 e Wales Nandy South r Bailey Weighted Sample 871 35 209 366 261 496 375 727 86 157 248 170 261 35 515 159 102 Unweighted Sample 871 17 319 310 225 490 381 754 75 142 262 178 264 25 523 157 104 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % Since becoming Labour leader, do you think Keir Starmer has changed the Labour Party for the better or the worse, or has he not made any real difference? Changed the Labour Party for the better 40 26 38 40 45 42 39 43 25 46 36 46 35 55 53 1 42 Changed the Labour Party for the worse 27 40 30 27 23 29 24 25 35 24 24 28 32 12 12 82 13 Has not made any real difference to the Labour 30 29 28 31 30 28 33 29 40 27 35 22 32 29 31 14 41 Party Don't know 3 5 5 3 2 2 5 3 0 2 5 4 1 4 3 3 4 Do you think Keir Starmer should remain as leader of the Labour Party, or stand down and let someone else take over? Should remain Labour leader 54 34 52 54 59 54 55 58 38 56 57 54 48 78 72 7 53 Should stand down and let someone else take over 34 55 34 35 30 36 32 31 48 28 30 35 44 16 17 86 33 Don't know 12 11 14 10 11 10 13 11 14 16 13 11 8 6 11 7 15 If Labour lose the forthcoming Batley & Spen by- election, do you think Keir Starmer should remain as leader of the Labour Party, or stand down and let someone else take over? Should remain Labour leader 48 22 46 49 53 48 48 51 36 49 50 49 42 74 65 9 43 Should stand down and let someone else take over 41 55 41 41 39 42 39 38 53 36 37 43 50 16 25 88 44 Don't know 11 23 13 11 8 9 13 10 11 16 13 8 8 10 10 3 13 How likely or unlikely do you think it is that Labour will win the next general election? Very likely 3 4 4 4 3 4 2 3 5 4 4 5 1 7 4 4 2 Fairly likely 18 0 14 16 24 17 18 18 20 13 16 18 21 23 19 10 26 TOTAL LIKELY 21 4 18 20 27 21 20 21 25 17 20 23 22 30 23 14 28 Fairly unlikely 46 35 54 46 41 46 46 47 38 51 46 46 45 33 48 36 50 Very unlikely 19 55 19 18 15 22 15 17 26 14 20 20 20 17 13 39 14 TOTAL UNLIKELY 65 90 73 64 56 68 61 64 64 65 66 66 65 50 61 75 64 Don't know 14 5 8 17 17 11 19 15 12 17 16 11 13 20 16 11 8 3 © 2021 YouGov plc.
Recommended publications
  • Download the Red Book

    Download the Red Book

    The For this agenda-setting collection, the leading civil society umbrella groups ACEVO and CAF worked with Lisa Nandy MP to showcase some of Red Book Labour’s key thinkers about the party’s future relationship with charities The and social enterprises. The accompanying ‘Blue Book’ and ‘Yellow Book’ feature similar essays from the Conservative and Liberal Democrat Parties. ‘This collection of essays shows the depth and vibrancy of thinking across the Labour movement on this important issue and makes a vital the Voluntary of Sector Red Book contribution to the debate in the run-up to the next election.’ Rt Hon Ed Miliband MP, Leader of the Labour Party of the ‘I hope this collection will be a provocation to further dialogue with Labour and with all the major political parties. It demonstrates a willingness to listen … that our sector should be grateful for.’ Voluntary Sector Sir Stephen Bubb, Chief Executive, ACEVO ‘The contributions in this collection show that the Labour Party possesses exciting ideas and innovations designed to strengthen Britain’s charities, Civil Society and the Labour Party and many of the concepts explored will be of interest to whichever party (or parties) are successful at the next election.’ after the 2015 election Dr John Low CBE, Chief Executive, Charities Aid Foundation With a foreword by the Rt Hon Ed Miliband MP £20 ISBN 978-1-900685-70-2 9 781900 685702 acevo-red-book-cover-centred-spine-text.indd All Pages 05/09/2014 15:40:12 The Red Book of the Voluntary Sector Civil Society and the Labour Party after
  • Lisa Nandy MP, Shadow Foreign Secretary

    Lisa Nandy MP, Shadow Foreign Secretary

    1 ANDREW MARR SHOW, 21ST MARCH, 2021 - LISA NANDY, MP ANDREW MARR SHOW, 21ST MARCH, 2021 LISA NANDY, MP SHADOW FOREIGN SECRETARY (Please check against delivery (uncorrected copies)) AM Lisa Nandy, it’s clear that the EU threat to block vaccines coming into the UK is still live. If that happens, how should the UK respond? LN: Well, I think the President of the European Commission’s comments were deeply, deeply unhelpful. I think that it was right listening to the Commissioner just now that we should try to calm down these tensions. We’ve seen throughout this process that we do better when we work together, that if we don’t defeat the virus everywhere we’re not going to defeat it anywhere, and there are new strains of the virus that are currently emerging. The South African variant which scientists are particularly worried about that is starting to gain traction in France that we need to be very mindful of. We may not be out of the woods with Covid yet and so we’ve got to work together. That means we need to calm these tensions; blockades are really unhelpful. I would urge the European Commission to calm down the language, cool the rhetoric and let’s try and work together to get through this crisis. AM: One of the crucial components of the Pfizer vaccine is made in Cheshire. If the EU banned the export of vaccines into the UK would the UK be justified in banning the exports of components back into the EU? LN: Well look, this is precisely the tit for tat we don’t want to get into.
  • ECON Thesaurus on Brexit

    ECON Thesaurus on Brexit

    STUDY Requested by the ECON Committee ECON Thesaurus on Brexit Fourth edition Policy Department for Economic, Scientific and Quality of Life Policies Authors: Stephanie Honnefelder, Doris Kolassa, Sophia Gernert, Roberto Silvestri Directorate General for Internal Policies of the Union July 2017 EN DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT A: ECONOMIC AND SCIENTIFIC POLICY ECON Thesaurus on Brexit Fourth edition Abstract This thesaurus is a collection of ECON related articles, papers and studies on the possible withdrawal of the UK from the EU. Recent literature from various sources is categorised, chronologically listed – while keeping the content of previous editions - and briefly summarised. To facilitate the use of this tool and to allow an easy access, certain documents may appear in more than one category. The thesaurus is non-exhaustive and may be updated. This document was provided by Policy Department A at the request of the ECON Committee. IP/A/ECON/2017-15 July 2017 PE 607.326 EN This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs. AUTHORS Stephanie HONNEFELDER Doris KOLASSA Sophia GERNERT, trainee Roberto SILVESTRI, trainee RESPONSIBLE ADMINISTRATOR Stephanie HONNEFELDER Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy European Parliament B-1047 Brussels E-mail: [email protected] LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN ABOUT THE EDITOR Policy departments provide in-house and external expertise to support EP committees and other parliamentary bodies
  • Antisemitic Anti-Zionism: the Root of Labour's Crisis. a Submission To

    Antisemitic Anti-Zionism: the Root of Labour's Crisis. a Submission To

    Antisemitic anti-Zionism: the root of Labour’s crisis A submission to the Labour Party inquiry into antisemitism and other forms of racism Professor Alan Johnson June 2016 Antisemitic anti-Zionism: the root of Labour’s Palestine, pro-Israel, pro-peace crisis 4.4 A final word Professor Alan Johnson is Senior Research Fellow at the Britain Israel Communications and Introduction Research Centre (BICOM), founder and editor of Fathom: for a deeper understanding of Israel Everything depends on the Labour Party and the region, and a registered Labour Party understanding what it is dealing with: almost supporter (Unite). never old-fashioned Jew hatred, almost always modern antisemitic anti-Zionism – a programme to abolish Israel, a movement to boycott Israel CONTENTS and discourse to demonise Israel. To combat it, the party needs to understand the historical roots, Introduction ideological tributaries, contemporary modes and forms of expressions of antisemitic anti-Zionism. Part 1: Ideological Tributaries 1.1 Rethinking our values: assimilationism, * universalism, the Jews and the Left 1.2 Ideological Tributary: Communism and ‘anti- Antisemitism is the most protean of hatreds and Cosmopolitanism’ it has shape-shifted again (Gidley 2011). Labour 1.3 Ideological Tributary: The New Left and ‘anti- does not have a neo-Nazi problem. It does, Zionism’ however, have a problem with a modern anti- 1.4 Ideological Tributary: Islam, Islamism and Zionism of a particularly excessive, obsessive, and antisemitism demonising kind, which has co-mingled with an older set of classical antisemitic tropes, images Part 2: Modes and assumptions to create antisemitic anti- 2.1 The Programme to abolish Israel Zionism (Wistrich 1984, 1991, 2004, 2009, 2012; 2.2 The Discourse to demonise Israel Johnson 2015a, 2016).
  • 347 Tuesday 11 June 2013 CONSIDERATION of BILL

    347 Tuesday 11 June 2013 CONSIDERATION of BILL

    347 House of Commons Tuesday 11 June 2013 CONSIDERATION OF BILL CHILDREN AND FAMILIES BILL, AS AMENDED NEW CLAUSES Transfer of EHC plans Secretary Michael Gove NC9 To move the following Clause:— ‘(1) Regulations may make provision for an EHC plan maintained for a child or young person by one local authority to be transferred to another local authority in England, where the other authority becomes responsible for the child or young person. (2) The regulations may in particular— (a) impose a duty on the other authority to maintain the plan; (b) treat the plan as if originally prepared by the other authority; (c) treat things done by the transferring authority in relation to the plan as done by the other authority.’. Childcare costs scheme: preparatory expenditure Secretary Michael Gove NC10 To move the following Clause:— ‘The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs may incur expenditure in preparing for the introduction of a scheme for providing assistance in respect of the costs of childcare.’. 348 Consideration of Bill: 11 June 2013 Children and Families Bill, continued Regulation of child performance Tim Loughton Meg Munn NC3 To move the following Clause:— ‘(1) In section 37 of the Children and Young Persons Act 1963 (Restriction on persons under 16 taking part in public performances, etc.) the words “under the compulsory school leaving age” shall be inserted after the word “child” in subsection (1). (2) After subsection (2) there shall be inserted— “(2A) In this section, “Performance” means the planned participation by a
  • The Theological Socialism of the Labour Church

    The Theological Socialism of the Labour Church

    ‘SO PECULIARLY ITS OWN’ THE THEOLOGICAL SOCIALISM OF THE LABOUR CHURCH by NEIL WHARRIER JOHNSON A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Theology and Religion School of Philosophy, Theology and Religion College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham May 2015 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT The thesis argues that the most distinctive feature of the Labour Church was Theological Socialism. For its founder, John Trevor, Theological Socialism was the literal Religion of Socialism, a post-Christian prophecy announcing the dawn of a new utopian era explained in terms of the Kingdom of God on earth; for members of the Labour Church, who are referred to throughout the thesis as Theological Socialists, Theological Socialism was an inclusive message about God working through the Labour movement. By focussing on Theological Socialism the thesis challenges the historiography and reappraises the significance of the Labour
  • Vindication, Virtue, and Vitriol

    Vindication, Virtue, and Vitriol

    Journal of Computational Social Science https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-020-00090-9 RESEARCH ARTICLE Vindication, virtue, and vitriol A study of online engagement and abuse toward British MPs during the COVID-19 pandemic Tracie Farrell1 · Genevieve Gorrell1 · Kalina Bontcheva1 Received: 21 July 2020 / Accepted: 11 October 2020 © The Author(s) 2020 Abstract COVID-19 has given rise to a lot of malicious content online, including hate speech, online abuse, and misinformation. British MPs have also received abuse and hate on social media during this time. To understand and contextualise the level of abuse MPs receive, we consider how ministers use social media to communicate about the pandemic, and the citizen engagement that this generates. The focus of the paper is on a large-scale, mixed-methods study of abusive and antagonistic responses to UK politicians on Twitter, during the pandemic from early February to late May 2020. We fnd that pressing subjects such as fnancial concerns attract high levels of engagement, but not necessarily abusive dialogue. Rather, criticising authorities appears to attract higher levels of abuse during this period of the pandemic. In addi- tion, communicating about subjects like racism and inequality may result in accusa- tions of virtue signalling or pandering by some users. This work contributes to the wider understanding of abusive language online, in particular that which is directed at public ofcials. Keywords Online hate · Abusive speech · Natural language processing · Politics · COVID-19 · Twitter * Tracie Farrell [email protected] Genevieve Gorrell [email protected] Kalina Bontcheva [email protected] 1 University of Shefeld, Shefeld, UK Vol.:(0123456789)1 3 Journal of Computational Social Science Introduction Social media can ofer a “temperature check” on which topics and issues are trend- ing for certain cross-sections of the public, and how they feel about them [21].
  • View Early Day Motions PDF File 0.12 MB

    View Early Day Motions PDF File 0.12 MB

    Published: Tuesday 17 November 2020 Early Day Motions tabled on Monday 16 November 2020 Early Day Motions (EDMs) are motions for which no days have been fixed. The number of signatories includes all members who have added their names in support of the Early Day Motion (EDM), including the Member in charge of the Motion. EDMs and added names are also published on the EDM database at www.parliament.uk/edm [R] Indicates that a relevant interest has been declared. New EDMs 1129 Closure of Suicide Forums Tabled: 16/11/20 Signatories: 17 Richard Burgon Mick Whitley Ian Lavery Kate Osborne Jeremy Corbyn Bell Ribeiro-Addy Apsana Begum Zarah Sultana Mary Kelly Foy Ms Diane Abbott Ian Byrne Rebecca Long Bailey Ian Mearns John McDonnell Grahame Morris Lloyd Russell-Moyle Tahir Ali That this house notes with sadness the death of Joe Nihill, a popular young man and former army cadet from Whinmoor in East Leeds who, following three bereavements, tragically took his life at 23 years old after accessing online forums that encourage suicide; is concerned that these forums, which contain content that both promotes suicide and recommends methods of suicide, can constitute a real danger to people, particularly people suffering with severe mental health problems; calls on the Government to significantly expand funding for mental health treatment and support, particularly for young people; congratulates his family for their inspiring campaign to prevent what happened to Joe happening to other people; and calls on the Government to assess the harm caused by forums that encourage suicide and look at what can be done to stop such promotion by such online promotion.
  • London Assembly Mayor’S Question Time – Thursday 18 July 2019 Transcript of Item 5 – Questions to the Mayor

    London Assembly Mayor’S Question Time – Thursday 18 July 2019 Transcript of Item 5 – Questions to the Mayor

    Appendix 2 London Assembly Mayor’s Question Time – Thursday 18 July 2019 Transcript of Item 5 – Questions to the Mayor 2019/14512 - “Shocking... horrifying... slow”: the Government’s response to removing flammable cladding post-Grenfell Andrew Dismore AM In a recent interview with the Evening Standard, London Fire Commissioner Dany Cotton described the Government’s action on building fire safety since the Grenfell Tower fire as “shocking... horrifying... slow” (Evening Standard, 4 July 2019) and warned that Londoners are at risk because of aluminium composite material on high rise blocks. LFC Cotton continued: “I don’t think anyone in government has responded in a satisfactory manner. We need more to be done. We need for it to be taken seriously.” Do you agree with her appraisal? Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I fully agree with London Fire Commissioner Dany Cotton [QFSM] that the Government has failed to do anywhere near enough on building fire safety since the fire at Grenfell Tower. Today, the cross-party Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee published a damning report, which agrees that the Government has been - and I quote - “far too slow to react” to the Grenfell Tower tragedy. After the devastating fire in June 2017, the Government promised urgent action to make everyone safe. More than two years later, our building regulation system is still unfit for purpose, we still lack clarity on the basic questions of whether certain types of cladding are safe, and tens of thousands of people continue to live in homes that may be unsafe, with leaseholders facing huge bills for interim safety measures and other safety works.
  • Saturday 18 July 2009

    Saturday 18 July 2009

    Contents House of Commons • Noticeboard ..........................................................................................................1 • The Week Ahead..................................................................................................2 • Order of Oral Questions .......................................................................................3 Weekly Business Information • Business of the House of Commons 13 – 17 July 2009........................................5 Bulletin • Written Ministerial Statements.............................................................................7 • Forthcoming Business of the House of Commons 20 July – 16 October 2009..10 • Forthcoming Business of the House of Lords 20 July – 16 October 2009 .........18 Editor: Kevin Williams Legislation House of Commons Public Legislation Information Office • Public Bills before Parliament 2008/09..............................................................20 London • Bills – Presentation, Publication and Royal Assent............................................30 SW1A 2TT • Public and General Acts 2008/09 .......................................................................31 www.parliament.uk • Draft Bills under consideration or published during 2008/09 Session ...............32 Tel : 020 7219 4272 Private Legislation Fax : 020 7219 5839 • Private Bills before Parliament 2008/09.............................................................33 [email protected] Delegated Legislation • Statutory Instruments .........................................................................................36
  • Her Majesty's Government and Her Official Opposition

    Her Majesty's Government and Her Official Opposition

    Her Majesty’s Government and Her Official Opposition The Prime Minister and Leader of Her Majesty’s Official Opposition Rt Hon Boris Johnson MP || Leader of the Labour Party Jeremy Corbyn MP Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasury (Chief Whip). He will attend Cabinet Rt Hon Mark Spencer MP remains || Nicholas Brown MP Treasurer of HM Household (Deputy Chief Whip) Stuart Andrew MP appointed Vice Chamberlain of HM Household (Government Whip) Marcus Jones MP appointed Chancellor of the Exchequer Rt Hon Rishi Sunak MP appointed || John McDonnell MP Chief Secretary to the Treasury - Cabinet Attendee Rt Hon Stephen Barclay appointed || Peter Dowd MP Exchequer Secretary to the Treasury Kemi Badenoch MP appointed Paymaster General in the Cabinet Office Rt Hon Penny Mordaunt MP appointed Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, and Minister for the Cabinet Office Rt Hon Michael Gove MP remains Minister of State in the Cabinet Office Chloe Smith MP appointed || Christian Matheson MP Secretary of State for the Home Department Rt Hon Priti Patel MP remains || Diane Abbott MP Minister of State in the Home Office Rt Hon James Brokenshire MP appointed Minister of State in the Home Office Kit Malthouse MP remains Parliamentary Under Secretary of State in the Home Office Chris Philp MP appointed Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, and First Secretary of State Rt Hon Dominic Raab MP remains || Emily Thornberry MP Minister of State in the Foreign and Commonwealth Office Rt Hon James Cleverly MP appointed Minister of State in the Foreign
  • Introduction to Staff Register

    Introduction to Staff Register

    REGISTER OF INTERESTS OF MEMBERS’ SECRETARIES AND RESEARCH ASSISTANTS (As at 15 October 2020) INTRODUCTION Purpose and Form of the Register In accordance with Resolutions made by the House of Commons on 17 December 1985 and 28 June 1993, holders of photo-identity passes as Members’ secretaries or research assistants are in essence required to register: ‘Any occupation or employment for which you receive over £410 from the same source in the course of a calendar year, if that occupation or employment is in any way advantaged by the privileged access to Parliament afforded by your pass. Any gift (eg jewellery) or benefit (eg hospitality, services) that you receive, if the gift or benefit in any way relates to or arises from your work in Parliament and its value exceeds £410 in the course of a calendar year.’ In Section 1 of the Register entries are listed alphabetically according to the staff member’s surname. Section 2 contains exactly the same information but entries are instead listed according to the sponsoring Member’s name. Administration and Inspection of the Register The Register is compiled and maintained by the Office of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards. Anyone whose details are entered on the Register is required to notify that office of any change in their registrable interests within 28 days of such a change arising. An updated edition of the Register is published approximately every 6 weeks when the House is sitting. Changes to the rules governing the Register are determined by the Committee on Standards in the House of Commons, although where such changes are substantial they are put by the Committee to the House for approval before being implemented.