USOE Fiscal Note Input HB 19 S1 Insurance Law Related Amendments
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Status: 2011 General Session--Ongoing Current as of: 2/10/2011 at 4:25 PM FISCAL NOTE LOG--HOUSE BILLS 2011 Thursday, February 10, 2011 Link to 2011 Legislature General Session Numbered Bills and Resolutions Link to 2011 Legislation Governor Actions Link to Bills and Bill Requests by Sponsor, Subject or Committee Link to Weekly Schedules of House--Feb 7 to Feb 11 Link to Recorded House Floor Debates Link to Legislative Calendars USOE Fiscal Note Input Web Site House and Senate Calendar Displays Link to Key Legislative Dates Link to 2011 General Session Page Legislative Fiscal Analyst's 2011 Compendium of Budget Information for Public Education Legislature Fiscal Highlights New Bills Added since this Document was last Published are Highlighted in Green New Fiscal Note Input from USOE to LFA Added since this Document was last Published is Highlighted in Blue Bills Passed by the House and Senate are Highlighted in Pumpkin Bills Signed by Governor or Allowed to Become Law without Signature are Highlighted in Yellow Bills Vetoed by Governor are Highlighted in Red S t Bill Number Bill Status USOE Approval a Other Notes and Date Date Sent to Link (Appropriations t Bill Title Tracking Required/ Assigned to USOE Fiscal Note Input Links Complete Received LFA in RED) u in Place Completed s This bill reduces notification costs for certain insurers. The bill may reduce insurance costs to local governments and individuals if premiums are Insurance Law Related reduced by changing the coverage requirement for emergency care H.B. 19 S1 Amendments--James A. 1-Feb-11 Sean 2-Feb-11 services. Line 2257 shifts COBRA notice requirements, and associated Dunnigan legal liability from the employer to the insurer. This may result in reduced costs for the employer, but increased costs to the insurer. The employer may have to pay increased premiums due to the cost shift to the insurer. Controlled Substance H.B. 23 Yes Modifications--Gage Froerer Mineral and Petroleum Literacy 02/07/11 Draft of H.B. 25 1 Enrolled Bill Yes --Jack R. Draxler Prepared Election Laws Revisions--R. H.B. 33 Yes Curt Webb Bonding Requirements for This bill eliminates the requirement to purchase surity bonds for certain 02/02/11 House/ education employees. Reducing the requirement would decrease costs. H.B. 40 Government Officers and Yes 20-Dec-10 Von 21-Dec-10 substituted It is assumed that all claims made under this area of the law wouls be Employees--Ryan Wilcox smaller than the $10 million the state r Bonding Requirements for There would be no savings from this bill. There would be no impact for school districts under this bill because UCA 51-7-15 would still require the H.B. 40 S1 Government Officers and No 1-Feb-11 Von 2-Feb-11 school business administrators to have a bond; removing the requirement Employees--Ryan Wilcox in lines 264-265 would have no impact. 02/02/11 Bill Fingerprints of Juveniles-- Substituted by H.B. 48 Yes Jeremy A. Peterson Standing Committee Source: State Office of Education; State Legislature; Governor's Office Compiled by: Larry Newton, USOE School Finance 1 of 27 I:\DATA\11 Bill Logs\2011 House and Senate Bill Log.xlsx Status: 2011 General Session--Ongoing Current as of: 2/10/2011 at 4:25 PM New Bills Added since this Document was last Published are Highlighted in Green New Fiscal Note Input from USOE to LFA Added since this Document was last Published is Highlighted in Blue Bills Passed by the House and Senate are Highlighted in Pumpkin Bills Signed by Governor or Allowed to Become Law without Signature are Highlighted in Yellow Bills Vetoed by Governor are Highlighted in Red S t Bill Number Bill Status USOE Approval a Other Notes and Date Date Sent to Link (Appropriations t Bill Title Tracking Required/ Assigned to USOE Fiscal Note Input Links Complete Received LFA in RED) u in Place Completed s Fingerprints of Juveniles-- H.B. 48 S1 Yes Jeremy A. Peterson School Termination This bill will not require additional appropriations nor will it have a H.B. 50 Procedures Modifications-- Yes 7-Jan-11 Emily 10-Jan-11 measurable fiscal impact on USOE, LEAs, or individuals. Ronda R. Menlove School and Institutional Trust H.B. 51 Yes Lands--Roger E. Barrus School and Institutional Trust 01/27/11 Bill H.B. 51 S1 Substituted by Yes Lands--Roger E. Barrus Standing Committee Electronic Communications in H.B. 54 Yes Public Meetings--Kraig Powell Electronic Communications in 02/02/11 Bill H.B. 54 S1 Substituted by Yes Public Meetings--Kraig Powell Standing Committee There would be an increase in property tax revenues from the basic tax rate, but there would be a decrease in other school district property tax rates. However, there would need to be a state appropriation of approximately $57 million for FY2012-13 to cover the mitigation payments. $18 million goes to the charter schools from the increase in the basic tax rate. It is projected that there would be a decrease in property taxes on businesses. Individuals could see a property tax increase if school districts were to recapture their property tax revenues from the increase of the basic rate that was sent to the state to increase the value of the WPU. The narrative in the fiscal note input explains the highlights of this bill. The spreadsheet shows the affects of this bill for each school district based on FY11's assessed valuations, current basic rate of 0.001495, and FY11's number of WPUs: Column 2 shows the Public School Funding--Wayne H.B. 65 Yes 21-Jan-11 Cathy projected revenue from the current basic rate, column 3 shows the A. Harper projected revenue from the 0.003000 Basic Rate, and then column 4 shows the additional revenue generated by freezing the basic rate. Column 5 shows the total number of WPUs for FY11 and then column 6 shows what the additional WPU distribution would be. Column 7 is the reduction in tax revenue pursuant to the certified tax rate -- the greater of column 4 (additional revenues due to the increase in the minimum basic tax rate) or column 6 (additional revenues distributed to the school district for the basic program as a result of the increase in the value of the WPU). Column 8 represents the additional revenue collected from the 0.003000 Basic Rate and the reduction in tax revenue (column 7). Column 9 represents what the reduction in the tax rate would be that yields net tax collections. Column 10 represents the mititgation payemnts that the legislature would have to fund for FY 2013 with $18,742,479 going to charter schools for a total of $38,935,846. The increase in level of offense for assault does not appear to increase H.B. 69 Assault Amendments--Jim Bird Yes 26-Jan-11 Sean 26-Jan-11 process or administrative costs on LEAs, local District Attorneys, County Attorneys, or the USOE. Source: State Office of Education; State Legislature; Governor's Office Compiled by: Larry Newton, USOE School Finance 2 of 27 I:\DATA\11 Bill Logs\2011 House and Senate Bill Log.xlsx Status: 2011 General Session--Ongoing Current as of: 2/10/2011 at 4:25 PM New Bills Added since this Document was last Published are Highlighted in Green New Fiscal Note Input from USOE to LFA Added since this Document was last Published is Highlighted in Blue Bills Passed by the House and Senate are Highlighted in Pumpkin Bills Signed by Governor or Allowed to Become Law without Signature are Highlighted in Yellow Bills Vetoed by Governor are Highlighted in Red S t Bill Number Bill Status USOE Approval a Other Notes and Date Date Sent to Link (Appropriations t Bill Title Tracking Required/ Assigned to USOE Fiscal Note Input Links Complete Received LFA in RED) u in Place Completed s A state or local law enforcement agency may transport an alien who is Illegal Immigration unlawfully present in the United States to a federal facility or other point of transfer to federal custory that is outside this state. When students leave H.B. 70 Enforcement Act--Stephen E. Yes 25-Jan-11 Cathy 26-Jan-11 the public education system,there could be a savings. Based on FY 2010 Sandstrom enrollment and expenditure data, for each student that is sent out of state, the state funding could be reduced by $4,065. Beginning in Fiscal Year 2013, 7.5% of state sales and use tax revenue will be deposited in the School Equalization Fund and distributed to school districts with 75% distributed in proportion to each school district's percentage of statewide enrollment and 25% distributed by the school Taxes and Related School district's percentage of the combined total three-year average enrollment 2/3/2011House H.B. 72 Funding Provisions Yes 25-Jan-11 Cathy 28-Jan-11 growth. For the 2012 tax year, the certified tax rate of each school district Comm - Held 13 0 3 Amendments--Michael E. Noel must be decreased by the amount necessary to reduce revenues for that school district by the projected amount of the allocation that the State Board of Education will make to that school district for FY 2013. School Districts are prohibited in going through Truth In Taxation for FY 2013, but thereafter, may go through that process to increase their tax rates. Dangerous Weapon H.B. 75 Yes 27-Jan-11 Sean 27-Jan-11 There does not appear to be any fiscal impact by changing the definitions Amendments--Curtis Oda as indicated in H.B.