DOCSLIB.ORG

Conifers Exhibit a Characteristic Inactivation of Auxin to Maintain Tissue

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Conifers Exhibit a Characteristic Inactivation of Auxin to Maintain Tissue bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/789420; this version posted October 1, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Title Conifers exhibit a characteristic inactivation of auxin to maintain tissue homeostasis Authors Federica Brunoni1,2,a, Silvio Collani1, Rubén Casanova-Saéz2, Jan Šimura2, Michal Karady2,a, Markus Schmid1, Karin Ljung2,b and Catherine Bellini1,3,b 1 Umeå Plant Science Centre, Dept of Plant Physiology, Umeå University (Umu), Umeå, Sweden 2 Umeå Plant Science Centre, Dept of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Umeå, Sweden 3 Institut Jean-Pierre Bourgin, UMR1318 INRA-AgroParisTech Versailles, France a Present address: Laboratory of Growth Regulators, Faculty of Science, Palacký University & Institute of Experimental Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Šlechtitelů 27, CZ- 78371, Olomouc, Czech Republic b to whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: [email protected] or [email protected] or [email protected] Summary • Dynamic regulation of the levels of the natural auxin, indol-3-acetic acid (IAA), is essential to coordinate most of the physiological and developmental processes and responses to environmental changes. Oxidation of IAA is a major pathway to control auxin concentrations in Arabidopsis and, along with IAA conjugation, to respond to perturbation of IAA homeostasis. However, these regulatory mechanisms are still poorly investigated in conifers. To reduce this gap of knowledge, we investigated the different contribution of the IAA inactivation pathways in conifers. • Mass spectrometry-based quantification of IAA metabolites under steady state conditions and after perturbation was investigated to evaluate IAA homeostasis in bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/789420; this version posted October 1, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. conifers. Putative Picea abies GH3 genes (PaGH3) were identified by a comprehensive phylogenetic analysis including Arabidopsis and basal land plants. Auxin-inducible PaGH3 genes were identified by expression analysis and their IAA-conjugating activity was explored. • Compared to Arabidopsis, oxidative and conjugative pathways differentially contribute to reduce IAA levels in conifers. We demonstrated that the oxidation pathway plays a marginal role in controlling IAA homeostasis in spruce. On the other hand, an excess of IAA rapidly activates GH3-mediated irreversible conjugation pathways. • Taken together, these data indicate that a diversification of IAA inactivation mechanisms evolved specifically in conifers. Keyword auxin conjugates, auxin homeostasis, conifers, GH3 genes, indol-3-acetic acid (IAA), Picea abies Introduction The phytohormone auxin mediates a variety of different developmental processes during a plant’s life cycle, acting also as an intercellular signal integrating environmental inputs and growth responses. An important level of regulation in auxin responses is the establishment of concentration gradients between cells and tissues (Vanneste & Friml, 2009; Ljung, 2013). Thus, it is critical for plants to tightly control differential auxin distribution, both at spatial and temporal levels. Metabolic and transport mechanisms jointly generate auxin gradients within tissues (Ruiz Rosquete et al., 2012; Ljung, 2013). Auxin transport depends on the differential localization of influx and efflux carriers at the plasma membrane, providing the plant with a carrier-driven mechanism that controls auxin directionality and distribution within tissues (Vanneste & Friml, 2009). Additionally, auxin levels are regulated via the balance between the rates of auxin biosynthesis and auxin inactivation, extending the complexity of the regulatory network of cellular auxin homeostasis (Ljung, 2013; Kramer & bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/789420; this version posted October 1, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Ackelsberg, 2015). The predominant auxin found in plants is indole-3-acetic acid (IAA). Multiple auxin biosynthetic pathways that rely on tryptophan (Trp) as a precursor have been proposed. The elucidation of these biosynthetic pathways demonstrated that IAA is locally produced and not ubiquitously, as it was earlier assumed (Normanly, 2010; LeClere et al., 2002; Zhao, 2018). Evidences for a Trp-independent pathway for IAA biosynthesis also exist but this pathway is less understood (Ljung, 2013; Zhao, 2018). The reduction of the cellular levels of free IAA also relies on auxin inactivation mechanisms, such as conjugation and degradation. IAA can be conjugated to various amino acid, peptide, and sugar moieties. Auxin conjugates might function as short-term intermediates that can release free IAA upon hydrolysis when required (LeClere et al., 2002; Ludwig-Müller, 2011). IAA can be reversibly conjugated via ester linkages to glucose by UDP-glucosyl transferases to produce indole-3- acetyl-1-glucosyl ester (IAGlc) (Jackson et al., 2001). Members of the GRETCHEN HAGEN3 (GH3) family of acyl amido synthetases mediate conjugation of IAA with amino acids (Staswick et al., 2005; Westfall et al., 2011). IAA amino acid conjugates are regarded as either reversible or irreversible IAA metabolites based on in vitro activity and in planta feeding assays (Östin et al., 1998; Kowalczyk & Sandberg, 2001). Conjugation to particular moieties, such as aspartate (Asp) and glutamate (Glu) to produce indole-3-acetyl-L-aspartic acid (IAAsp) and indole-3-acetyl glutamic acid (IAGlu), seems to lead to degradation (Östin et al., 1998; Tam et al., 2000), whereas IAA conjugates with other amino acids (e. g., alanine, leucine or phenylalanine) are transient storage compounds that could be hydrolysed back to free IAA via auxin amino acid conjugate hydrolases (Kowalczyk & Sandberg, 2001; LeClere et al., 2002). The oxidation of IAA into oxindole-3-acetic acid (oxIAA) is one of the major catabolic pathways to inactivate auxin (Östin et al., 1998; Peer et al., 2013; Pěnčík et al., 2013). Recent findings demonstrated that the DIOXYGENASE FOR AUXIN OXIDATION (DAO) protein, a 2- oxoglutarate-dependent-Fe (II) dioxygenase, catalyzes conversion of IAA to oxIAA (Zhao et al., 2013; Porco et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2016). oxIAA can be further glucosylated to oxindole-3-acetyl-1-glucosyl ester (oxIAGlc) (Östin et al., 1998; Kai et al., 2007). The characterization of these metabolic pathways together with the identification of the key components of the auxin conjugation and degradation machineries have significantly improved our understanding of their respective contribution to the regulation of auxin homeostasis. For example, metabolic profiling of the loss-of-function dao1 mutant showed bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/789420; this version posted October 1, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. that, despite the reduction of oxIAA concentration in the mutant, no significant accumulation of IAA was observed (Porco et al., 2016). Very interestingly, the levels of IAA conjugates, such as IAAsp and IAGlu, were found to be much higher in the dao1 mutant than in wild-type plants and the accumulation of these IAA metabolites was associated with an increase of GH3 gene expression in the dao1 mutant (Porco et al., 2016). These findings demonstrated that DAO1 acts in concert with GH3 genes to maintain optimal auxin levels, and thus the regulation of IAA homeostasis by these auxin inactivation pathways is redundant (Stepanova & Alonso, 2016; Zhang & Peer, 2017). Additionally, differences in enzyme kinetics and expression levels between DAO and GH3 suggested that DAO, having much slower enzyme kinetics compared with GH3 proteins, contributes to maintain constitutively basal auxin levels under normal growth conditions, while GH3 rapidly responds to environmental factors that increase cellular IAA levels (Mellor et al., 2016; Stepanova & Alonso, 2016). Although the majority of the knowledge about auxin metabolism is based on Arabidopsis thaliana studies, the conjugation and oxidation mechanisms seem to be present also in many other species (Cooke et al., 2002; Ludwig-Müller, 2011; Zhang & Peer, 2017). Analysis of endogenous IAA metabolites in cyanobacteria, algae and bryophytes revealed that free IAA and its primary catabolite oxIAA contribute the most to the total auxin pool in these species (Drábková et al., 2015; Žižková et al., 2017). IAAsp concentration was close to the detection limit in algae and cyanobacteria under normal growth conditions, while exogenous application of radiolabeled IAA led to accumulation of IAAsp and IAGlc in green algae (Žižková et al., 2017). IAA amino acid conjugates were not found abundant in bryophytes and only IAAsp and IAGlu were detected in some species, if present at all (Drábková et al., 2015). Ester-linked conjugates, such as IAGlc and oxIAGlc, were also present in liverworts and mosses but they did not contribute considerably to the total pool of auxin (Drábková et al., 2015). In gymnosperms, it has been postulated that the two different categories of IAA conjugates
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Seed Plant Models
    Review Tansley insight Why we need more non-seed plant models Author for correspondence: Stefan A. Rensing1,2 Stefan A. Rensing 1 2 Tel: +49 6421 28 21940 Faculty of Biology, University of Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Str. 8, 35043 Marburg, Germany; BIOSS Biological Signalling Studies, Email: stefan.rensing@biologie. University of Freiburg, Sch€anzlestraße 18, 79104 Freiburg, Germany uni-marburg.de Received: 30 October 2016 Accepted: 18 December 2016 Contents Summary 1 V. What do we need? 4 I. Introduction 1 VI. Conclusions 5 II. Evo-devo: inference of how plants evolved 2 Acknowledgements 5 III. We need more diversity 2 References 5 IV. Genomes are necessary, but not sufficient 3 Summary New Phytologist (2017) Out of a hundred sequenced and published land plant genomes, four are not of flowering plants. doi: 10.1111/nph.14464 This severely skewed taxonomic sampling hinders our comprehension of land plant evolution at large. Moreover, most genetically accessible model species are flowering plants as well. If we are Key words: Charophyta, evolution, fern, to gain a deeper understanding of how plants evolved and still evolve, and which of their hornwort, liverwort, moss, Streptophyta. developmental patterns are ancestral or derived, we need to study a more diverse set of plants. Here, I thus argue that we need to sequence genomes of so far neglected lineages, and that we need to develop more non-seed plant model species. revealed much, the exact branching order and evolution of the I. Introduction nonbilaterian lineages is still disputed (Lanna, 2015). Research on animals has for a long time relied on a number of The first (small) plant genome to be sequenced was of THE traditional model organisms, such as mouse, fruit fly, zebrafish or model plant, the weed Arabidopsis thaliana (c.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Evolution an Introduction to the History of Life
    Plant Evolution An Introduction to the History of Life KARL J. NIKLAS The University of Chicago Press Chicago and London CONTENTS Preface vii Introduction 1 1 Origins and Early Events 29 2 The Invasion of Land and Air 93 3 Population Genetics, Adaptation, and Evolution 153 4 Development and Evolution 217 5 Speciation and Microevolution 271 6 Macroevolution 325 7 The Evolution of Multicellularity 377 8 Biophysics and Evolution 431 9 Ecology and Evolution 483 Glossary 537 Index 547 v Introduction The unpredictable and the predetermined unfold together to make everything the way it is. It’s how nature creates itself, on every scale, the snowflake and the snowstorm. — TOM STOPPARD, Arcadia, Act 1, Scene 4 (1993) Much has been written about evolution from the perspective of the history and biology of animals, but significantly less has been writ- ten about the evolutionary biology of plants. Zoocentricism in the biological literature is understandable to some extent because we are after all animals and not plants and because our self- interest is not entirely egotistical, since no biologist can deny the fact that animals have played significant and important roles as the actors on the stage of evolution come and go. The nearly romantic fascination with di- nosaurs and what caused their extinction is understandable, even though we should be equally fascinated with the monarchs of the Carboniferous, the tree lycopods and calamites, and with what caused their extinction (fig. 0.1). Yet, it must be understood that plants are as fascinating as animals, and that they are just as important to the study of biology in general and to understanding evolutionary theory in particular.
    [Show full text]
  • Number of Living Species in Australia and the World
    Numbers of Living Species in Australia and the World 2nd edition Arthur D. Chapman Australian Biodiversity Information Services australia’s nature Toowoomba, Australia there is more still to be discovered… Report for the Australian Biological Resources Study Canberra, Australia September 2009 CONTENTS Foreword 1 Insecta (insects) 23 Plants 43 Viruses 59 Arachnida Magnoliophyta (flowering plants) 43 Protoctista (mainly Introduction 2 (spiders, scorpions, etc) 26 Gymnosperms (Coniferophyta, Protozoa—others included Executive Summary 6 Pycnogonida (sea spiders) 28 Cycadophyta, Gnetophyta under fungi, algae, Myriapoda and Ginkgophyta) 45 Chromista, etc) 60 Detailed discussion by Group 12 (millipedes, centipedes) 29 Ferns and Allies 46 Chordates 13 Acknowledgements 63 Crustacea (crabs, lobsters, etc) 31 Bryophyta Mammalia (mammals) 13 Onychophora (velvet worms) 32 (mosses, liverworts, hornworts) 47 References 66 Aves (birds) 14 Hexapoda (proturans, springtails) 33 Plant Algae (including green Reptilia (reptiles) 15 Mollusca (molluscs, shellfish) 34 algae, red algae, glaucophytes) 49 Amphibia (frogs, etc) 16 Annelida (segmented worms) 35 Fungi 51 Pisces (fishes including Nematoda Fungi (excluding taxa Chondrichthyes and (nematodes, roundworms) 36 treated under Chromista Osteichthyes) 17 and Protoctista) 51 Acanthocephala Agnatha (hagfish, (thorny-headed worms) 37 Lichen-forming fungi 53 lampreys, slime eels) 18 Platyhelminthes (flat worms) 38 Others 54 Cephalochordata (lancelets) 19 Cnidaria (jellyfish, Prokaryota (Bacteria Tunicata or Urochordata sea anenomes, corals) 39 [Monera] of previous report) 54 (sea squirts, doliolids, salps) 20 Porifera (sponges) 40 Cyanophyta (Cyanobacteria) 55 Invertebrates 21 Other Invertebrates 41 Chromista (including some Hemichordata (hemichordates) 21 species previously included Echinodermata (starfish, under either algae or fungi) 56 sea cucumbers, etc) 22 FOREWORD In Australia and around the world, biodiversity is under huge Harnessing core science and knowledge bases, like and growing pressure.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from 20 Years of Plant Genome Sequencing: an Unprecedented Resource in Need of More Diverse Representation
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.31.446451; this version posted May 31, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Lessons from 20 years of plant genome sequencing: an unprecedented resource in need of more diverse representation Authors: Rose A. Marks1,2,3, Scott Hotaling4, Paul B. Frandsen5,6, and Robert VanBuren1,2 1. Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA 2. Plant Resilience Institute, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA 3. Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa 4. School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA 5. Department of Plant and Wildlife Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA 6. Data Science Lab, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA Keywords: plants, embryophytes, genomics, colonialism, broadening participation Correspondence: Rose A. Marks, Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA; Email: [email protected]; Phone: (603) 852-3190; ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7102-5959 Abstract The field of plant genomics has grown rapidly in the past 20 years, leading to dramatic increases in both the quantity and quality of publicly available genomic resources. With an ever- expanding wealth of genomic data from an increasingly diverse set of taxa, unprecedented potential exists to better understand the evolution and genome biology of plants.
    [Show full text]
  • A Visual Guide to Collecting Plant Tissues for DNA
    A visual guide to collecting plant tissues for DNA Collecting kit checklist Silica gel1 Permanent marker and pencil Resealable bags, airtight plastic container Razor blade / Surgical scissors Empty tea bags or coffee filters Ethanol and paper tissue or ethanol wipes Tags or jewellers tags Plant press and collecting book 1. Selection and preparation of fresh plant tissue: Sampling avoided. Breaking up leaf material will bruise the plant tissue, which will result in enzymes being released From a single plant, harvest 3 – 5 mature leaves, or that cause DNA degradation. Ideally, leaf material sample a piece of a leaf, if large (Picture A). Ideally should be cut into smaller fragments with thick a leaf area of 5 – 10 cm2 should be enough, but this midribs being removed (Picture C). If sampling robust amount should be adjusted if the plant material is leaf tissue (e.g. cycads, palms), use a razor blade or rich in water (e.g. a succulent plant). If leaves are surgical scissors (Picture D). small (e.g. ericoid leaves), sample enough material to equate a leaf area of 5 – 10 cm2. If no leaves are Succulent plants available, other parts can be sampled such as leaf buds, flowers, bracts, seeds or even fresh bark. If the If the leaves are succulent, use a razor blade to plant is small, select the biggest specimen, but never remove epidermal slices or scoop out parenchyma combine tissues from different individuals. tissue (Picture E). Cleaning Ideally, collect clean fresh tissues, however if the leaf or plant material is dirty or shows potential contamination (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic and Wet Marchantiophyta, Order Metzgeriales: Aneuraceae
    Glime, J. M. 2021. Aquatic and Wet Marchantiophyta, Order Metzgeriales: Aneuraceae. Chapt. 1-11. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte 1-11-1 Ecology. Volume 4. Habitat and Role. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 11 April 2021 and available at <http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology/>. CHAPTER 1-11: AQUATIC AND WET MARCHANTIOPHYTA, ORDER METZGERIALES: ANEURACEAE TABLE OF CONTENTS SUBCLASS METZGERIIDAE ........................................................................................................................................... 1-11-2 Order Metzgeriales............................................................................................................................................................... 1-11-2 Aneuraceae ................................................................................................................................................................... 1-11-2 Aneura .......................................................................................................................................................................... 1-11-2 Aneura maxima ............................................................................................................................................................ 1-11-2 Aneura mirabilis .......................................................................................................................................................... 1-11-7 Aneura pinguis ..........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mitochondrial Genomes of the Early Land Plant Lineage
    Dong et al. BMC Genomics (2019) 20:953 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-6365-y RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Mitochondrial genomes of the early land plant lineage liverworts (Marchantiophyta): conserved genome structure, and ongoing low frequency recombination Shanshan Dong1,2, Chaoxian Zhao1,3, Shouzhou Zhang1, Li Zhang1, Hong Wu2, Huan Liu4, Ruiliang Zhu3, Yu Jia5, Bernard Goffinet6 and Yang Liu1,4* Abstract Background: In contrast to the highly labile mitochondrial (mt) genomes of vascular plants, the architecture and composition of mt genomes within the main lineages of bryophytes appear stable and invariant. The available mt genomes of 18 liverwort accessions representing nine genera and five orders are syntenous except for Gymnomitrion concinnatum whose genome is characterized by two rearrangements. Here, we expanded the number of assembled liverwort mt genomes to 47, broadening the sampling to 31 genera and 10 orders spanning much of the phylogenetic breadth of liverworts to further test whether the evolution of the liverwort mitogenome is overall static. Results: Liverwort mt genomes range in size from 147 Kb in Jungermanniales (clade B) to 185 Kb in Marchantiopsida, mainly due to the size variation of intergenic spacers and number of introns. All newly assembled liverwort mt genomes hold a conserved set of genes, but vary considerably in their intron content. The loss of introns in liverwort mt genomes might be explained by localized retroprocessing events. Liverwort mt genomes are strictly syntenous in genome structure with no structural variant detected in our newly assembled mt genomes. However, by screening the paired-end reads, we do find rare cases of recombination, which means multiple concurrent genome structures may exist in the vegetative tissues of liverworts.
    [Show full text]
  • Shaping the Evolutionary Tree of Green Plants: Evidence from the GST Family
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Shaping the evolutionary tree of green plants: evidence from the GST family Received: 15 June 2017 Francesco Monticolo1, Chiara Colantuono1 & Maria Luisa Chiusano1,2 Accepted: 5 October 2017 Glutathione-S-transferases (GSTs) are encoded by genes belonging to a wide ubiquitous family Published: xx xx xxxx in aerobic species and catalyze the conjugation of electrophilic substrates to glutathione (GSH). GSTs are divided in diferent classes, both in plants and animals. In plants, GSTs function in several pathways, including those related to secondary metabolites biosynthesis, hormone homeostasis, defense from pathogens and allow the prevention and detoxifcation of damage from heavy metals and herbicides. 1107 GST protein sequences from 20 diferent plant species with sequenced genomes were analyzed. Our analysis assigns 666 unclassifed GSTs proteins to specifc classes, remarking the wide heterogeneity of this gene family. Moreover, we highlighted the presence of further subclasses within each class. Regarding the class GST-Tau, one possible subclass appears to be present in all the Tau members of ancestor plant species. Moreover, the results highlight the presence of members of the Tau class in Marchantiophytes and confrm previous observations on the absence of GST-Tau in Bryophytes and green algae. These results support the hypothesis regarding the paraphyletic origin of Bryophytes, but also suggest that Marchantiophytes may be on the same branch leading to superior plants, depicting an alternative model for green plants evolution. Glutathione-S-transferases (GSTs) are enzymes encoded by a ubiquitous gene family in aerobic species, able to conjugate electrophilic xenobiotics and endogenous cell components with glutathione (GSH)1.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Land Plants P
    Chapter 4. The evolutionary classification of land plants The evolutionary classification of land plants Land plants evolved from a group of green algae, possibly as early as 500–600 million years ago. Their closest living relatives in the algal realm are a group of freshwater algae known as stoneworts or Charophyta. According to the fossil record, the charophytes' growth form has changed little since the divergence of lineages, so we know that early land plants evolved from a branched, filamentous alga dwelling in shallow fresh water, perhaps at the edge of seasonally-desiccating pools. The biggest challenge that early land plants had to face ca. 500 million years ago was surviving in dry, non-submerged environments. Algae extract nutrients and light from the water that surrounds them. Those few algae that anchor themselves to the bottom of the waterbody do so to prevent being carried away by currents, but do not extract resources from the underlying substrate. Nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus, together with CO2 and sunlight, are all taken by the algae from the surrounding waters. Land plants, in contrast, must extract nutrients from the ground and capture CO2 and sunlight from the atmosphere. The first terrestrial plants were very similar to modern mosses and liverworts, in a group called Bryophytes (from Greek bryos=moss, and phyton=plants; hence “moss-like plants”). They possessed little root-like hairs called rhizoids, which collected nutrients from the ground. Like their algal ancestors, they could not withstand prolonged desiccation and restricted their life cycle to shaded, damp habitats, or, in some cases, evolved the ability to completely dry-out, putting their metabolism on hold and reviving when more water arrived, as in the modern “resurrection plants” (Selaginella).
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous Charophytes from The
    A review of the Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous charophytes from the northern Aquitaine Basin in south-west France Roch-Alexandre Benoit, Didier Néraudeau, Carles Martin-Closas To cite this version: Roch-Alexandre Benoit, Didier Néraudeau, Carles Martin-Closas. A review of the Late Jurassic– Early Cretaceous charophytes from the northern Aquitaine Basin in south-west France. Cretaceous Research, Elsevier, 2017, 79, pp.199-213. <10.1016/j.cretres.2017.07.009>. <insu-01574653> HAL Id: insu-01574653 https://hal-insu.archives-ouvertes.fr/insu-01574653 Submitted on 16 Aug 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Accepted Manuscript A review of the Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous charophytes from the northern Aquitaine Basin in south-west France Roch-Alexandre Benoit, Didier Neraudeau, Carles Martín-Closas PII: S0195-6671(17)30121-0 DOI: 10.1016/j.cretres.2017.07.009 Reference: YCRES 3658 To appear in: Cretaceous Research Received Date: 13 March 2017 Revised Date: 5 July 2017 Accepted Date: 17 July 2017 Please cite this article as: Benoit, R.-A., Neraudeau, D., Martín-Closas, C., A review of the Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous charophytes from the northern Aquitaine Basin in south-west France, Cretaceous Research (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.cretres.2017.07.009.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Information the Biodiversity and Geochemistry Of
    Supplementary Information The Biodiversity and Geochemistry of Cryoconite Holes in Queen Maud Land, East Antarctica Figure S1. Principal component analysis of the bacterial OTUs. Samples cluster according to habitats. Figure S2. Principal component analysis of the eukaryotic OTUs. Samples cluster according to habitats. Figure S3. Principal component analysis of selected trace elements that cause the separation (primarily Zr, Ba and Sr). Figure S4. Partial canonical correspondence analysis of the bacterial abundances and all non-collinear environmental variables (i.e., after identification and exclusion of redundant predictor variables) and without spatial effects. Samples from Lake 3 in Utsteinen clustered with higher nitrate concentration and samples from Dubois with a higher TC abundance. Otherwise no clear trends could be observed. Table S1. Number of sequences before and after quality control for bacterial and eukaryotic sequences, respectively. 16S 18S Sample ID Before quality After quality Before quality After quality filtering filtering filtering filtering PES17_36 79285 71418 112519 112201 PES17_38 115832 111434 44238 44166 PES17_39 128336 123761 31865 31789 PES17_40 107580 104609 27128 27074 PES17_42 225182 218495 103515 103323 PES17_43 219156 213095 67378 67199 PES17_47 82531 79949 60130 59998 PES17_48 123666 120275 64459 64306 PES17_49 163446 158674 126366 126115 PES17_50 107304 104667 158362 158063 PES17_51 95033 93296 - - PES17_52 113682 110463 119486 119205 PES17_53 126238 122760 72656 72461 PES17_54 120805 117807 181725 181281 PES17_55 112134 108809 146821 146408 PES17_56 193142 187986 154063 153724 PES17_59 226518 220298 32560 32444 PES17_60 186567 182136 213031 212325 PES17_61 143702 140104 155784 155222 PES17_62 104661 102291 - - PES17_63 114068 111261 101205 100998 PES17_64 101054 98423 70930 70674 PES17_65 117504 113810 192746 192282 Total 3107426 3015821 2236967 2231258 Table S2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Charophytes (Charophyta) Locality in the Milkha Stream, Lower Jordan, Israel
    Natural Resources and Conservation 3(2): 19-30, 2015 http://www.hrpub.org DOI: 10.13189/nrc.2015.030201 The Charophytes (Charophyta) Locality in the Milkha Stream, Lower Jordan, Israel Sophia Barinova1,*, Roman Romanov2 1Institute of Evolution, University of Haifa, Israel 2Central Siberian Botanical Garden of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Russia Copyright © 2015 by authors, all rights reserved. Authors agree that this article remains permanently open access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License Abstract First study of new locality the Milkha Stream, revealed 14 charophyte species (16 with ifraspecific variety) the Lower Jordan River tributary, with charophyte algae, in that known for Israel [3,4] from references and our studies. semi-arid region of Israel has been implemented for Last year research in Israel and Eastern Mediterranean let us revealing of algal diversity and ecological assessment of the too includes few new localities, algal diversity of which has water object environment by bio-indication methods. been never studied before [5-10]. Altogether forty seven species from five taxonomic The charophytes prefer alkaline water environment which Divisions of algae and cyanobacteria including one of them forms on the carbonates that are very distributed in studied macro-algae Chara gymnophylla A. Braun were revealed in region. This alkaline freshwater environment can be assessed the Milkha stream. Chara was found in growth in the lower as perspective for find new, unstudied aquatic objects in part of studied stream but away from community in followed which can be identified charophyte algae. The most years.
    [Show full text]