DOCSLIB.ORG

Whitfords Nodes Foreshore Flora, Fauna and Fungi Survey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Whitfords Nodes Foreshore Flora, Fauna and Fungi Survey Whitfords Nodes Foreshore Flora, Fauna and Fungi Survey Prepared for City of Joondalup February 2016 Whitfords Nodes Foreshore Flora, Fauna and Fungi Survey DOCUMENT TRACKING Item Detail Project Name Whitfords Nodes Foreshore Flora, Fauna and Fungi Survey Project Number 15PER_2667 Joel Collins Project Manager (08) 9227 1070 Suite 1 & 2, 49 Ord Street, West Perth Prepared by James Leonard, Nicki Thompson, Robert Browne-Cooper, Katrina Zeehandelaar-Adams Reviewed by Joel Collins Approved by Mark Vile Status FINAL Version Number V2 Last saved on 2 March 2016 Photos taken at Whitfords Nodes: Schizophyllum commune (Split Gill Fungus), Strophurus Cover photo spinigerus (South-western Spiny-tailed Gecko) and Carpobrotus virescens (Coastal Pigface) @ Eco Logical Australia 2015. This report should be cited as ‘Eco Logical Australia 2016. Whitfords Nodes Foreshore Flora, Fauna and Fungi Survey. Prepared for the City of Joondalup.’ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document has been prepared by Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd with support from the City of Joondalup. Disclaimer This document may only be used for the purpose for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the contract between Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd and the City of Joondalup. The scope of services was defined in consultation with the City of Joondalup, by time and budgetary constraints imposed by the client, and the availability of reports and other data on the subject area. Changes to available information, legislation and schedules are made on an ongoing basis and readers should obtain up to date information. Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report and its supporting material by any third party. Information provided is not intended to be a substitute for site specific assessment or legal advice in relation to any matter. Unauthorised use of this report in any form is prohibited. © ECO LOGICAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD ii Whitfords Nodes Foreshore Flora, Fauna and Fungi Survey Contents Executive summary .............................................................................................................................. viii 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Project background ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Legislative framework ................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Project objectives ......................................................................................................................... 1 2 Desktop review ........................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Study area .................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Bioregion ....................................................................................................................................... 4 2.3 Climate .......................................................................................................................................... 5 2.4 Landform, geology and soils......................................................................................................... 5 2.5 Flora and vegetation ..................................................................................................................... 5 2.6 Conservation and environmentally sensitive areas ...................................................................... 6 2.7 Priority ecological communities .................................................................................................... 6 2.8 Literature review and database searches .................................................................................... 6 2.8.1 Conservation significant flora and fungi ....................................................................................... 7 3 Methodology ............................................................................................................................... 9 3.1 Survey team and timing ................................................................................................................ 9 3.2 Flora, vegetation and fungi survey ............................................................................................... 9 3.2.1 Flora and vegetation ................................................................................................................... 10 3.2.2 FCT analysis ............................................................................................................................... 11 3.2.3 Specimen identification and nomenclature ................................................................................. 11 3.2.4 Fungi ........................................................................................................................................... 11 3.3 Fauna survey .............................................................................................................................. 12 3.3.1 Habitat assessment and trap site selection ................................................................................ 12 3.3.2 Animal ethics .............................................................................................................................. 12 3.3.3 Sampling methods ...................................................................................................................... 12 3.3.4 Taxonomy and nomenclature ..................................................................................................... 14 4 Results ....................................................................................................................................... 17 4.1 Flora, vegetation and fungi ......................................................................................................... 17 4.1.1 Flora ............................................................................................................................................ 17 4.1.2 Conservation significant flora ..................................................................................................... 17 4.1.3 Introduced flora ........................................................................................................................... 17 4.1.4 Vegetation communities and condition ....................................................................................... 21 4.1.5 FCT analysis ............................................................................................................................... 29 © ECO LOGICAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD iii Whitfords Nodes Foreshore Flora, Fauna and Fungi Survey 4.1.6 Environmentally sensitive areas ................................................................................................. 30 4.1.7 Priority ecological communities .................................................................................................. 30 4.1.8 Fungi ........................................................................................................................................... 33 4.1 Fauna .......................................................................................................................................... 34 4.1.2.1 Conservation significant species ................................................................................................ 34 4.1.2.2 Other fauna species ................................................................................................................... 35 5 Discussion................................................................................................................................. 41 5.1 Flora, fungi and vegetation ......................................................................................................... 41 5.2 Fauna .......................................................................................................................................... 42 6 Recommendations ................................................................................................................... 45 References ............................................................................................................................................. 46 Appendix A Framework for conservation significant flora and fauna ranking ............................... 48 Appendix B Likelihood of occurrence criteria for conservation significant flora and fauna ........ 52 Appendix C Flora likelihood of occurrence ........................................................................................ 53 Appendix D Fauna likelihood of occurrence ...................................................................................... 55 Appendix E Fungi species list ............................................................................................................. 57 Appendix F Fauna trap configuration ................................................................................................. 61 Appendix G Flora species recorded .................................................................................................... 62 Appendix H Flora species matrix........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Macnaughton Crescent Structure Plan  /Rw0Df1dxjkwrq&Uhvfhqw.Lqurvv   0Dufk 
    MACNAUGHTON CRESCENT STRUCTURE PLAN /RW0DF1DXJKWRQ&UHVFHQW.LQURVV 0DUFK 3HHW/LPLWHG 'RFXPHQW6WDWXV VERSION COMMENT PREPARED BY REVIEWED BY REVIEW DATE APPROVED BY ISSUE DATE )LQDOY &OLHQW5HYLHZ 06 6' -+ )LQDOY 6XEPLVVLRQ 06 6' -+ )LQDOY &LW\&RPPHQWV 00 -+ -+ )LQDOY &LW\6XEPLVVLRQBIRU$GYHUWLVLQJ 00 -+ -+ )LQDOY &LW\6XEPLVVLRQ (QYLUR8SGDWHV BIRU$GYHUWVLQJ 00 -+ -+ )LQDOY :$3&6FKHGXOHRI0RGLILFDWLRQV±)HE -+ -+ -+ MACNAUGHTON CRESCENT STRUCTURE PLAN LOT 9021 MACNAUGHTON CRESCENT, KINROSS MARCH 2017 3UHSDUHGIRU 3HHW/LPLWHG /HYHO6W*HRUJHV7HUUDFH 3(57+:$ 7 ) (SHUWK#SHHWFRPDX 3UHSDUHGE\ &UHDWLYH'HVLJQ3ODQQLQJ %URZQ6WUHHW ($673(57+:$ 7 ) (LQIR#FUHDWLYHGSFRPDX ,Q&ROODERUDWLRQ:LWK (PHUJH$VVRFLDWHV 6XLWH5DLOZD\5RDG 68%,$&2:$ 7 ) (DGPLQ#HPHUJHDVVRFLDWHVFRPDX 5LOH\&RQVXOWLQJ 32%R[=6W*HRUJHV7HUUDFH 3(57+:$ 7 (MRQULOH\WUDIILF#JPDLOFRP 7DEHF :LFNKDP6WUHHW ($673(57+:$ 7 ) (LQIR#WDEHFFRPDX &UHDWLQJ&RPPXQLWLHV -HUVH\6WUHHW -2/,0217:$ 7 ) (LQIR#FUHDWLQJFRPPXQLWLHVFRPDX 'LVFODLPHUDQG&RS\ULJKW 7KLVGRFXPHQWZDVFRPPLVVLRQHGE\DQGSUHSDUHGIRUWKHH[FOXVLYHXVHRI3HHW/LPLWHG,WLVVXEMHFWWRDQGLVVXHGLQDFFRUGDQFHZLWKWKHDJUHHPHQWEHWZHHQ3HHW/LPLWHGDQG&'3 &'3DFWVLQDOOSURIHVVLRQDOPDWWHUVDVDIDLWKIXODGYLVRUWRLWVFOLHQWVDQGH[HUFLVHVDOOUHDVRQDEOHVNLOODQGFDUHLQWKHSURYLVLRQRISURIHVVLRQDOVHUYLFHV7KHLQIRUPDWLRQSUHVHQWHGKHUHLQKDVEHHQFRPSLOHGIURPDQXPEHURIVRXUFHVXVLQJDYDULHW\RIPHWKRGV ([FHSWZKHUHH[SUHVVO\VWDWHG&'3GRHVQRWDWWHPSWWRYHULI\WKHDFFXUDF\YDOLGLW\RUFRPSUHKHQVLYHQHVVRIWKLVGRFXPHQWRUWKHPLVDSSOLFDWLRQRUPLVLQWHUSUHWDWLRQE\WKLUGSDUWLHVRILWVFRQWHQWV
    [Show full text]
  • Acacia Saligna RA
    Risk Assessment: ………….. ACACIA SALIGNA Prepared by: Etienne Branquart (1), Vanessa Lozano (2) and Giuseppe Brundu (2) (1) [[email protected]] (2) Department of Agriculture, University of Sassari, Italy [[email protected]] Date: first draft 01 st November 2017 Subsequently Reviewed by 2 independent external Peer Reviewers: Dr Rob Tanner, chosen for his expertise in Risk Assessments, and Dr Jean-Marc Dufor-Dror chosen for his expertise on Acacia saligna . Date: first revised version 04 th January 2018, revised in light of comments from independent expert Peer Reviewers. Approved by the IAS Scientific Forum on 26/10/2018 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 Branquart, Lozano & Brundu PRA Acacia saligna 8 9 10 Contents 11 Summary of the Express Pest Risk Assessment for Acacia saligna 4 12 Stage 1. Initiation 6 13 1.1 - Reason for performing the Pest Risk Assessment (PRA) 6 14 1.2 - PRA area 6 15 1.3 - PRA scheme 6 16 Stage 2. Pest risk assessment 7 17 2.1 - Taxonomy and identification 7 18 2.1.1 - Taxonomy 7 19 2.1.2 - Main synonyms 8 20 2.1.3 - Common names 8 21 2.1.4 - Main related or look-alike species 8 22 2.1.5 - Terminology used in the present PRA for taxa names 9 23 2.1.6 - Identification (brief description) 9 24 2.2 - Pest overview 9 25 2.2.2 - Habitat and environmental requirements 10 26 2.2.3 Resource acquisition mechanisms 12 27 2.2.4 - Symptoms 12 28 2.2.5 - Existing PRAs 12 29 Socio-economic benefits 13 30 2.3 - Is the pest a vector? 14 31 2.4 - Is a vector needed for pest entry or spread? 15 32 2.5 - Regulatory status of the pest 15 33 2.6 - Distribution
    [Show full text]
  • Acacia in THIS ISSUE Dacacia the Name Acacia Comes This Issue of Seed Notes from the Greek Acacia, Ace Will Cover the Genus Or Acis Meaning a Point Or Acacia
    No. 9 Acacia IN THIS ISSUE DAcacia The name Acacia comes This issue of Seed Notes from the Greek acacia, ace will cover the genus or acis meaning a point or Acacia. thorn, or from acazo, to D Description sharpen, although this name applies more to African than D Geographic Australian species (Australian distribution and Acacia have no thorns or habitat larger prickles, unlike those D Reproductive biology that are native to Africa). D Seed collection Many species of Acacia, or wattles as they are commonly D Phyllodes and flowers of Acacia aprica. Photo – Andrew Crawford Seed quality called in Australia, are valuable assessment for a range of uses, in D Seed germination particular as garden plants. Description In Australia, Acacia (family is modified to form a leaf- D Recommended reading They are also used for amenity plantings, windbreaks, shade DMimosaceae) are woody like structure or phyllode. trees, groundcovers, erosion plants that range from These phyllodes may be flat and salinity control. The timber prostrate under-shrubs to or terete. Some species do of some Acacia is very hard tall trees. Acacia flowers are not have phyllodes and the and is ideal for fence posts small, regular and usually flattened stems or cladodes (e.g. A. saligna or jam). Other bisexual. They occur in spikes act as leaves. Foliage can Acacia species are used to or in globular heads and vary from blueish to dark make furniture and ornaments. range in colour from cream green to silvery grey. Most The seed of some wattles is to intense yellow. The leaves species of Acacia have glands a good food source for birds, of Acacia may be bipinnate on the axis of the phyllodes, other animals and humans (the primary leaflets being although in Australian as ‘bush tucker’.
    [Show full text]
  • Yellagonga Regional Park Management Plan 2003-2013
    Y ellagonga Regional Park Regional Management Plan Management Plan 2003—2013 Yellagonga Regional Park Management Plan 2003-2013 MANAGEMENT PLAN 48 CITY OF JOONDALUP CITY OF WANNEROO Yellagonga Regional Park Management Plan 2003 - 2013 PLANNING TEAM This plan was co-ordinated by a consultancy team led by Plan E working closely with the managers of Yellagonga Regional Park – the Department of Conservation and Land Management, the City of Joondalup and the City of Wanneroo. The Planning Team prepared the plan for the Conservation Commission of Western Australia. Brendan Dooley (Plan Coordinator) Department of Conservation and Land Management Tim Bowra Department of Conservation and Land Management Dennis Cluning City of Joondalup Phil Thompson City of Wanneroo PREFACE Regional parks are areas of regional open space that are identified by planning procedures as having outstanding conservation, landscape and recreation values. Regional parks provide the opportunity for a consortium of management agencies and private landowners to develop co-ordinated planning and management strategies. Regional parks were first proposed in the Stephenson - Hepburn Report of 1955, which later formed the basis of the Perth Metropolitan Region Scheme in 1963. Since then, State planning agencies have been acquiring suitable private land in anticipation of the time when regional parks would be formally created. In 1997, the State government announced a commitment to introduce legislation to give regional parks legal standing and vesting in the former NPNCA, now the Conservation Commission of Western Australia. Eight regional parks were recognised as formal identities, with the co-ordination of their management progressively transferred to the Department of Conservation and Land Management.
    [Show full text]
  • Seed Dispersal Effectiveness: a Comparison of Four Bird Species Feeding on Seeds of Invasive Acacia Cyclops in South Africa
    South African Journal of Botany 105 (2016) 259–263 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect South African Journal of Botany journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/sajb Seed dispersal effectiveness: A comparison of four bird species feeding on seeds of invasive Acacia cyclops in South Africa T.M. Mokotjomela a,⁎,C.T.Downsb,K.Eslerc, J. Knight a a School of Geography, Archaeology and Environmental Studies, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, Wits 2050, Johannesburg, South Africa b DST-NRF Centre for Invasion Biology, School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Scottsville, 3209, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa c Department of Conservation Ecology and Entomology & Centre for Invasion Biology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa article info abstract Article history: Seed dispersal effectiveness (SDE) for vertebrates is determined as a product of quantity (numbers of seeds Received 10 September 2015 dispersed) and quality (probability that a dispersed seed becomes a new adult plant) components. There is a limited Received in revised form 30 March 2016 understanding of seed dispersal effectiveness for different avian vectors in South Africa, yet birds are important for Accepted 5 April 2016 long-distance dispersal for native species, and are implicated in the dispersal of many invasive plant species such as Available online 26 April 2016 Acacia cyclops. Consequently, SDE was investigated in four bird species that are common seed dispersers in South Edited by MG Kulkarni Africa, of which two are frugivorous species (the Knysna turaco Tauraco corythaix and the red-winged starling Onychognathus morio), and two are granivorous species (the red-eyed dove Streptopelia semitorquata and the Keywords: laughing dove Streptopelia senegalensis).
    [Show full text]
  • Volatiles Associated with Different Flower Stages and Leaves of Acacia
    South African Journal of Botany 76 (2010) 701–709 www.elsevier.com/locate/sajb Volatiles associated with different flower stages and leaves of Acacia cyclops and their potential role as host attractants for Dasineura dielsi (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) ⁎ M.J. Kotze a, , A. Jürgens b, S.D. Johnson b, J.H. Hoffmann a a Zoology Department, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa b School of Biological and Conservation Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal Pietermaritzburg, Private Bag X01, Scottsville 3209, South Africa Received 19 June 2010; received in revised form 26 July 2010; accepted 27 July 2010 Abstract Acacia cyclops (Fabaceae) is an Australian species which was introduced into South Africa in the nineteenth century. Because of its invasive status in South Africa, a gall midge, Dasineura dielsi (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae), was released in 2001 in order to impact its reproduction by inducing galls on the flowers and thereby preventing seed set. Nothing is known about the cues used by D. dielsi for locating its host flowers. As part of an initial investigation into whether or not chemical cues might play a role in host finding, we analysed headspace samples of Acacia cyclops volatiles from leaves and reproductive parts at different stages (early bud, late bud, early flowering, and senescing flowering stages) using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS). In total, 72 different compounds were detected of which 62 were identified. The analyses showed that open flowers, the stage used by D. dielsi for oviposition, and yellow buds had similar odour compositions with (Z)-3-hexen-1-ol acetate, 4-oxoisophorone, (Z)-β-ocimene, an unknown aliphatic compound, heptadecane, and nonadecane dominating in open flowers.
    [Show full text]
  • Wanneroo Cover Outside.Cdr
    PLANT SPECIES REFERRED TO IN THESE NOTES Natives Narrow-leaved Red Mallee Eucalyptus foecunda Banbar Melaleuca teretifolia One-sided Bottlebrush Calothamnus quadrifidus Bare Twigrush Baumea juncea Pajang Acacia lasiocarpa Basket Bush Spyridium globulosum Pale Rush Juncus pallidus Birds and Reserves Boobialla Myoporum insulare Parrot Bush Dryandra sessilis Blueboy Stirlingia latifolia Pink Fan Trigger Plant Stylidium utriculariodes of the Bull Banksia Banksia grandis Pink Summer Calytrix Calytrix fraseri Bulrush Typha angustifolia Pineapple Bush Dasypogon bromeliifolius City of Wanneroo Bulrush Typha domingensis Prickly Moses Acacia pulchella Candlestick Banksia Banksia attenuata Quandong Santalum acuminatum Chenille Honeymyrtle Melaleuca huegelii Redheart Eucalyptus decipiens Chinese Brake Pteris vittata Reed Triggerplant Stylidium junceum Christmas Tree Nuytsia floribunda Regelia Regelia inops Chuck Exocarpus sparteus Rough Honeymyrtle Melaleuca scabra Coastal Blackbutt Eucalyptus todtiana Seaheath Frankenia pauciflora Coastal Daisybush Olearia axillaris Shining Fanflower Scaevola nitida Slender Coastal Honeymyrtle Melaleuca acerosa Slender Podolepis Podolepis gracilis Coastal Leschenaultia Leschenaultia linariodes Snakebush Hemiandra pungens Coastal Wattle Acacia cyclops Stalked Guinea Flower Hibbertia racemosa Cockies Tongues Templetonia retusa Summer-scented Wattle Acacia rostellifera Common Smokebush Conospermum stoechadis Swamp Banksia Banksia littoralis Common Woollybush Adenanthos cygnorum Swamp Teatree Leptospermum ellipticum
    [Show full text]
  • Synoptic Overview of Exotic Acacia, Senegalia and Vachellia (Caesalpinioideae, Mimosoid Clade, Fabaceae) in Egypt
    plants Article Synoptic Overview of Exotic Acacia, Senegalia and Vachellia (Caesalpinioideae, Mimosoid Clade, Fabaceae) in Egypt Rania A. Hassan * and Rim S. Hamdy Botany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza 12613, Egypt; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: For the first time, an updated checklist of Acacia, Senegalia and Vachellia species in Egypt is provided, focusing on the exotic species. Taking into consideration the retypification of genus Acacia ratified at the Melbourne International Botanical Congress (IBC, 2011), a process of reclassification has taken place worldwide in recent years. The review of Acacia and its segregates in Egypt became necessary in light of the available information cited in classical works during the last century. In Egypt, various taxa formerly placed in Acacia s.l., have been transferred to Acacia s.s., Acaciella, Senegalia, Parasenegalia and Vachellia. The present study is a contribution towards clarifying the nomenclatural status of all recorded species of Acacia and its segregate genera. This study recorded 144 taxa (125 species and 19 infraspecific taxa). Only 14 taxa (four species and 10 infraspecific taxa) are indigenous to Egypt (included now under Senegalia and Vachellia). The other 130 taxa had been introduced to Egypt during the last century. Out of the 130 taxa, 79 taxa have been recorded in literature. The focus of this study is the remaining 51 exotic taxa that have been traced as living species in Egyptian gardens or as herbarium specimens in Egyptian herbaria. The studied exotic taxa are accommodated under Acacia s.s. (24 taxa), Senegalia (14 taxa) and Vachellia (13 taxa).
    [Show full text]
  • Phytosociological Study of Andrew's Field and Tsaba-Tsaba Nature Reserve
    Phytosociological study of Andrew's field and Tsaba-Tsaba nature reserve, Rredasdorp district, Western Cape. by MARGARETHA MARIA ZIETSMAN Submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MAGISTER SCIENTIAE in the Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences (Department of Botany) University of Pretoria Pretoria Supervisor: Prof. Dr. G.J. Bredenkamp November 2003 © University of Pretoria The works of the LORD are great, Studied by all who have a pleasure in them. Psalm 111 : 2 (NKJV) Dedicated to my parents ABSTRACT Phytosociological study of Andrew's field and Tsaba-Tsaba nature reserve, . Bredasdorp district, Western Cape. by MARGARETHA MARIA ZIETSMAN Supervisor: Prof. Dr. G.J. Bredenkamp DEPARTMENT OF BOTANY UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA MAGISTER SCIENTIAE The vegetation of Andrew's Field and Tsaba-Tsaba nature reserve, Bredasdorp district, Western Cape was hierarchical classified using Braun-Blanquet procedures and TWINSPAN. The resulting 10 plant communities, 19 sub-communities and four variants, were described and ecological interpreted. The vegetation was sampled using 171 randomly stratified sample plots. The floristic composition, Braun-Blanquet cover-abundance scale of each species, and various environmental variables were recorded in each sample plot. The relation between the vegetation units and the associated environmental gradients was confirmed by DECORANA ordination, conducted on the floristic data. The conservation priority of each vegetation unit was determined by taking Red Data List species, limestone endemic species and Cape Floristic Region endemic species into consideration. The distribution of the vegetation units can mainly be ascribed to differences in the clay/sand content of the soil and the degree of exposure of the vegetation to the dominating winds (Southeastern and Northwestern) of the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Growing Locals
    Karrakatta soils Kinross Burns Beach Useful references: Iluka Currambine Joondalup Powell, R. and Emberson, J (2001) Growing Locals. Rigby, G and B (2005) Successfully Growing Australian Connolly Native Plants. Growing locals Ocean Reef Elliot, R (2008) Australian Plants for Gardens in the Sun. Heathridge Edgewater Chadwick, D (1999) Australian Native Gardening in Karrakatta soils Made Easy. Beldon Mullaloo Hahn, S (2007) Sabrina’s Little ABC Book of Gardening. City of Joondalup (2011) Plants and People in Craigie Mooro Country: Nyungar Plant Use in Yellagonga Kallaroo Woodvale Regional Park. Padbury Websites for further information: Hillarys Kingsley watercorporation.com.au “Being Waterwise” bgpa.wa.gov.au/horticulture ozemail.com.au/~wildflowers Greenwood Sorrento Duncraig Warwick Marmion T: 08 9400 4000 F: 08 9300 1383 Boas Avenue Joondalup WA 6027 PO Box 21 Joondalup WA 6919 joondalup.wa.gov.au This document is available in alternative formats upon request. Bossiaea eriocarpa Printed on 100% recycled paper. Banksia prionotes Suitable for the suburbs of Craigie, Duncraig, Local plants for Karrakatta soils Edgewater, Greenwood, Kingsley, Padbury, Warwick, Woodvale. Climbers and ground covers Shrubs 1– 3 metres Botanical name Common name Botanical name Common name What are local plants? Hardenbergia comptoniana Native Wisteria Adenanthos cygnorum Woolly Bush Local plants are species that would naturally occur Hemiandra pungens Snake Bush Allocasuarina humilis Dwarf Sheoak in your neighbourhood and are therefore adapted to the local climate and soil. Kennedia prostrata Scarlet Runner Calytrix fraseriana Herbs Hakea lissocarpha Honeybush Why grow local plants? Botanical name Common name Shrubs 3– 5 metres • Local plants are adapted to the local climate and Anigozanthos humilis Cats Paw Botanical name Common name soils.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2009 Monthly Report
    March 2012 MONTHLY REPORT Compliance Management Roland and Stefan checked 39 recreational fishing and bait collectors permits during March. Of the 39 permits checked 5 did not have valid permits on them and were given friendly warnings. There were no fines issued this month however all three rangers attended a peace officers course at the Goukamma Marine Protected Area. The peace officers course was held on the 27th, 28th and 29th and presented by Dr. FJW Herbig. As it currently stands, the rangers cannot issue any J534 fines as they do not have those powers. If the rangers encounter any serious offences, Dept. of Fisheries has to be contacted in Mossel Bay to come out and write the necessary fines. This often takes a while, complicating the fining process. Once the rangers have received their certificates, they need to apply to be appointed as peace officers by the Station Commander at the nearest Police Station. They then need to approach Dept. of Fisheries to be appointed as Fisheries Control Officers, that can enforce the Marine Living Resources Act. Once this has been completed the rangers will have the powers to fine people on the spot for any contraventions of the Marine Living Resources Act. On the 30th, the rangers attended a one day self defense course. The instructor focused on key elements during a confrontational situation and how one can deal with them in the best manner. A big thank you to Wayne Meyer (Ex Fransmanshoek Senior Ranger), who now works at Goukamma Marine Protected Area, for organizing both short courses mainly for the Cape Nature staff but managed to slot the Fransmanshoek Conservancy rangers in the program.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter No.131
    !" " Contents Page From The Leader Dear Members From the Leader 1 A very successful ANPSA Biennial Conference was Welcome 2 recently hosted by the ANPS Canberra Group. About 200 Vale ! Russell Best 2 people attended the Conference, including 21 Acacia Study Future Field Trips 2 Group members. As part of the Conference, our Study From Members and Readers 2 Group set up a display, and there was also a meeting of An Experiment 5 Study Group members. Pictures and Manuscripts collections at The National Library of Australia 5 In relation to the display, I would like to thank Joanna Different Scarification Treatments ! A. McLachlan, Lyn Burgett, Victoria Tanner and Sue Guymer cyclops and A. victoriae 8 for helping to put it together. Thanks also to the Australian Acacias and Allergies 8 National Botanic Gardens for providing the Acacia flowers Some Wattle Trivia 8 and foliage that were used in the display. One component Seed Bank 9 of the display featured vases of wattle flowers and foliage, Study Group Membership 9 with different water treatments intended to illustrate how Seed Bank List 10 the vase life was impacted by the different treatments. A report on this is included on page 5, together with an invitation to all Study Group members to take part in a small experiment in relation to how to prolong the vase life of Acacias ! the more people who take part in this, the more interesting the results may be. Note: If you wish to view or download previous Study Group Newsletters, they are At our Study Group meeting, a number of matters were discussed.
    [Show full text]