Geologic Construction-Material Resources in Mitchell ^County, Kansas

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Geologic Construction-Material Resources in Mitchell ^County, Kansas GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 106 June 1951 GEOLOGIC CONSTRUCTION-MATERIAL RESOURCES IN MITCHELL ^COUNTY, KANSAS Frank E. Byrne, Wendell B. Johnson, and Denzil W. Bergman PREPARED IN COOPERATION WITH THE STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION OF KANSAS R. C. Keeling, State Highway Engineer S. E. Horner, Chie* Geologist R. D. Finney, Chief Engineer Prepared as Part of a Program of the Department of the Interior for Development of the Missouri River Basin UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Oscar L. Chapman, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director Washington, D. C. Free on application to the Geological Survey, Washington 25, D. C. CONTENTS Page Page Introduction. .............. l Sanborn formation ......... 15 Purpose of the investigation ..... 1 Areal distribution ....... 15 Geography ............./1 General description ...... 16 Area covered by the investigation. 1 Representative measured section 16 Topography .......... 1 Thickness ........... 16 Drainage. ........... 1 Construction materials ..... 16 Climate ............ 1 Terrace deposits. ......... 16 Transportation routes ...... 3 Areal distribution ....... 16 Investigation procedure ....... 3 General description ...... 16 Acknowledgments .......... 3 Representative measured section 17 Characteristics of the outcropping Thickness ........... 17 stratigraphic units ........... 4 Construction materials ..... 17 General .............. 4 Alluvium ............. 17 Dakota sandstone .......... 4 Areal distribution ........ 17 Areal distribution. ....... 4 General description ...... 17 General description. ...... 4 Representative measured section 17 Representative measured section. @ Thickness. .......... 17 Thickness ........... 6 Construction materials ..... 17 Construction materials ..... 6 Inventory of construction materials ... 17 Graneros shale ........... 6 General. ............. 17 Areal distribution. ....... 6 Aggregate for concrete ....... 18 General description. ...... 6 Engineering and geologic Representative measured section. 7 characteristics ....... 18 Thickness ........... 7 Stratigraphic sources and per­ Construction materials ..... 7 formance characteristics ... 18 Greenhorn limestone ........ 7 Sanborn formation ..... 18 Areal distribution. ....... 7 Alluvium ......... 18 General description ....... 7 Road metal ............ 18 Lincoln limestone member. 7 Engineering and geologic Hartland shale member ... 8 characteristics ....... 18 Jetmore chalk member ... 8 Aggregate for concrete ... 18 Pfeifer shale member .... 8 Indurated rocks ...... 18 Representative measured sections 9 Limestone gravel ..... 19 Thickness ........... 13 Stratigraphic sources and per­ Construction materials ..... 13 formance characteristics ... 19 Carlile shale ............ 13 Sources of aggregate for Areal distribution. ....... 13 concrete ........ 19 General description . ...... 13 ' Indurated rocks ...... 19 Fairport chalky shale Dakota sandstone. ... 19 member ......... 13 Greenhorn limestone . 19 Blue Hill shale member ... 13 Carlile shale ..... 19 Codell sandstone member . 14 Niobrara formation. 19 Representative measured Sanborn formation ..... 19 sections ........... 14 Mineral filler ........... 19 Thickness ........... 14 Engineering and geologic Construction materials ..... 14 characteristics ....... 19 Niobrara formation ......... 14 Stratigraphic sources and per­ Areal distribution. ....... 14 formance characteristics ... 19 General description. ...... 15 Sanborn formation ..... 19 Representative measured Terrace deposits. ..... 20 section ........... 15 Riprap .............. 20 Thickness ........... 15 Engineering and geologic Construction materials ..... 15 characteristics ........ 20 CONTENTS (Continued) Page Page Inventory of construction mate rials -- Stratigraphic sources and per­ Continued formance characteristics . 20 R ip r ap - - C ontinue d Greenhorn limestone . 20 Stratigraphic sources and per­ Niobrara formation .... 20 formance characteristics . , 20 Subgrade and'embankment Dakota sandstone ..... 20 material............ 21 Greenhorn limestone . 20 Engineering and geologic Niobrara formation .... 20 characteristics ....... 21 Structural stone ......... 20 Stratigraphic sources and per­ Engineering and geologic formance characteristics . 21 characteristics. ...... 20 Fine-granular sediments . 21 Stratigraphic sources and per­ Coarse-granular sediments 21 formance characteristics . , 20 Broken or crushed rock . 21 Greenhorn limestone . , 20 Dakota sandstone . 21 Niobrara formation. , 20 Graneros shale . 21 Calcareous binder ........ 20 Greenhorn limestone . 21 Engineering and geologic Carlile shale . 1 characteristics. ...... 20 Niobrara formation . ILLUSTRATIONS Page Plate 1. Map showing construction materials and geology of Mitchell County, Kans. ... In pocket Figure 1. Index map of Kansas showing area covered by this report and by other construction materials investigations reports .................. 1 2. Chart showing temperature ranges at C'oncordia, Kans.. .............. 1 3. Chart showing precipitation ranges at Beloit, Kans. ................ 1 4. Outcropping Stratigraphic units in Mitchell County, Kans., and their construction materials .................................. 5 TABLE Page Table 1. Summary of materials tests In pocket GEOLOGIC CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL RESOURCES IN MITCHELL COUNTY, KANSAS INTRODUCTION Purpose of the Investigation short distance southeast of Tipton in the area known as the Blue Hills. The State Highway Commission of Kansas and the United States Geological Survey are co­ The two most conspicuous typographic fea­ operating in the compilation of a State-wide in­ tures in the county are the valley of the Solomon ventory construction materials. A field party River and the Blue Hills. The valleys of the composed of personnel from the two cooperat­ North and South Forks of the Solomon River, ing agencies was sent into Mitchell County, which join in the vicinity of Cawker City to form Kans. , in the summer of 1948 to investigate the Solomon River, are incised about 50 Teet be­ .sources of engineering construction materials. low the general level; in the eastern part of the This report of the Mitchell County investigation county, the valley of the Solomon River has been is a part of the general inventory and a contri­ incised to a depth of about 150 feet. In the valley bution to the geologic mapping and investigation is an extensive terrace which, in the vicinity of of mineral resources being made in connection Glen Elder, is only slightly more than a mile with studies of the Missouri River basin. \J wide but increases in width to almost 4 miles at the eastern boundary of the county. The primary objective of the investigation The Blue Hills in the southwestern part of was to accumulate all field and laboratory data Mitchell County stand conspicuously above the pertaining to the geologic materials in Mitchell general level. The hills are buttes and mesas County that would be of use in the construction capped by the Fort Hays limestone member of of dams, highways, airports, and other engi­ the Niobrara formation. (See pi. 1 and fig. 4.) neering structures. Additional geologic data Their steep slopes have been cut into the Carlile are included in this report but only to the extent shale. The highest of the hills project almost of providing information useful in the develop­ 300 feet above the surrounding upland plain. ment of the prospects reported in the inventory, or for the location of other materials required Most of the area of Mitchell County is oc­ for future engineering needs. cupied by a rolling upland plain only moderately dissected by the tributaries of the Solomon River Geography in the central and northern parts of the county and by those of Salt Creek in the southern part. Area Covered by the Investigation The walls of the valleys through which the smaller streams flow are gently sloping for the Mitchell County is in the second tier of most part- a shoulder formed by the Greenhorn Kansas counties south of the Nebraska border limestone (see pi. 1 and fig. 4) marks the top of and in the seventh tier west of the Missouri man- of the valley walls. I.iterstream areas are border. (See fig. 1.) It comprises 20 townships flat to rounded. and covers an area of about 720 square miles. The county is bounded on the north by Jewell Drainage and Cloud Counties, on the east by Cloud and Surface drainage in Mitchell County is con­ Ottawa Counties, on the south by Lincoln Coun­ trolled by the Solomon River ami its tributaries. ty, and on the west by Osborne County. (See pi. 1.) The longest tributaries, Walnut and Clay Creeks, head in the Blue Hills and flow Topography northward. Salt Creek is the largest stream in the southern part of the county. It is another The average altitude of Mitchell County is tributary of the Solomon River, which it joins in 1, 500 feet. The lowest point, about 1,310 feet, the northern part of Saline County. is on the Solomon River at the east boundary and the highest point, about 1, 885 feet, is a Climate 1 Missouri River Basin, conservation, control, and use Mitchell County is in an area of continen­ of water resources: 78th Cong.. 2d sess., S. doc. 191, tal-type climate in which the summers are rel­ 1944. atively long and hot and the winters short and Report in Report prepo ration published Figure I. Index map of Kansas showing areas covered by this report and by other construction materials investigations EXPLANATION EXPLANATION - Days in which precipitation 'n *h' ch maximum temperature was more than 90° f. Data
Recommended publications
  • Waconda Lake WRAPS 9 Element Watershed Protection Plan
    Waconda Lake WRAPS 9 Element Watershed Protection Plan Water Quality Impairments Directly Addressed: Waconda Lake Eutrophication TMDL (Medium Priority) North Fork Solomon River E. coli TMDL (Medium Priority) South Fork Solomon River E. coli TMDL (High Priority) Other Impairments Which Stand to Benefit from Watershed Plan Implementation: South Fork Solomon River Biology TMDL (Low Priority), Total Phosphorus 303(d) listing, and Total Suspended Solids 303(d) listing North Fork Solomon River Total Phosphorus 303(d) listing, Total Suspended Solids 303(d) listing, and Biology 303(d) listing Twin Creek Dissolved Oxygen TMDL (Medium Priority) Oak Creek Dissolved Oxygen 303(d) listing and Total Phosphorus 303(d) listing Carr Creek Total Phosphorus 303(d) listing and Total Suspended Solids 303(d) listing Beaver Creek Dissolved Oxygen 303(d) listing, Total Phosphorus 303(d) listing, and Total Suspended Solids 303(d) listing Deer Creek Dissolved Oxygen 303(d) listing and Total Phosphorus 303(d) listing Determination of Priority Areas Spreadsheet Tool for Estimating Pollutant Loads (STEPL) Model to identify HUC 12 watersheds within highest estimated phosphorus loads for cropland targeted areas Interpretation of water quality data included within bacteria TMDLs for North and South Fork Solomon Rivers to identify HUC 12 watersheds to focus BMP implementation towards addressing bacteria impairment issues. Best Management Practice and Load Reduction Goals Phosphorus Watershed Plan Waconda Lake Load to Meet Waconda Lake Current Waconda Lake
    [Show full text]
  • Kirwin Lake WRAPS 9 Element Watershed Protection Plan
    Kirwin Lake WRAPS 9 Element Watershed Protection Plan Water Quality Impairments Directly Addressed: • Kirwin Lake Eutrophication TMDL (Medium Priority) Other Impairments Which Stand to Benefit from Watershed Plan Implementation: • Kirwin Lake Dissolved Oxygen TMDL (Medium Priority) • Bow Creek Near Stockton Total Phosphorous 303(d) listing • North Fork Solomon River Near Glade Total Phosphorous 303(d) listing • Logan City Lake Eutrophication 303(d) listing Determination of Priority Areas Information collected by the Graham, Norton and Phillips county NRCS offices was used by KSU in a SWAT model to identify priority HUC12s. Because of extremely low soil erosion rates, the SLT requested KDHE verify the SWAT model results. KDHE used the Cropland/Slope Analysis method to verify the SWAT model data. The results confirmed the SWAT results identifying nine HUC12s. This method also identified eleven additional HUC12s as significant potential sediment contributors. The SLT agreed to develop two priority area, Tiers 1 and 2, above Kirwin Lake to focus BMP implementation towards addressing nonpoint source impairment issues. Best Management Practice and Load Reduction Goals Phosphorus Load to Watershed Plan Kirwin Lake Current Meet Kirwin Lake Phosphorus Load Phosphorus Load EU TMDL (143,000 lbs/yr) Reduction Goal (48,400 lbs/yr) (94,600 lbs/yr) BMPs to be implemented in association Watershed Plan Duration and Costs with Watershed Plan: • Total plan length = 30 years • Cropland-related BMPs o Load reduction goal of plan met during year 30 o Permanent vegetation • o Grassed waterways Total plan cost = $25,802,172 Cropland BMP Implementation o No-till cropland production o . $15,638,153 o Terraces Livestock BMP Implementation o Nutrient management o .
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Solomon River Subbasin
    Lower Solomon River Subbasin 2008 - Field Analysis Summary Subbasin Water Resource Management Program Division of Water Resources Kansas Department of Agriculture nd 109 SW Ninth Street – 2 Floor Topeka, KS 66612-1283 785-296-6087 Table of Contents I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................3 II. Precipitation ................................................................................................................................5 III. Surface Water.............................................................................................................................6 IV. Groundwater ............................................................................................................................10 V. Water Use ..................................................................................................................................16 VI. Conclusions..............................................................................................................................17 VII. Appendix ................................................................................................................................17 Figures Figure 1: Solomon River Basin divided into subbasins .................................................................. 4 Figure 2: Lower Solomon Subbasin precipitation 1900-2007 ........................................................ 5 Figure 3: 2008 Monthly Average Precipitation .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kansas Department of Health and Environment Division of Environment 1000 S.W
    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 7 901 NORTH 5TH STREET KANSAS CITY, KANSAS 66101 AUG 1 2 2mu Mr. John Mitchell, Director Kansas Department of Health and Environment Division of Environment 1000 S.W. Jackson St., Suite 540 Topeka, Kansas 66612-1368 Dear Mr. Mitchell: On March 31,2010, the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE) submitted the Kansas (KS) 2010 Section (§) 303(d) list as required by § 303(d) (1 ) of the Clean Water Act (CWA). With today's letter, we have completed the review of the KS 2010 § 303( d) list of impaired waters. The list identifies classified stream segments, lakes, and wetlands of the state which are impaired and for which Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) shall be developed. EPA received, in a separate submittal, the KS 2010 CWA § 305(b) report on April 1, 2010. Today's action is on the KS 2010 § 303(d) list. As Director ofthe Water, Wetlands and Pesticides Division, I am charged with the responsibility of reviewing and approving or disapproving state 303(d) lists under CWA § 303(c). I am hereby approving the KS 2010 § 303(d) list for the following: • 1387 water bodies (1311 stream segments and 76 lakes) for which a pollutant has caused, is suspected of causing, or is projected to cause an impairment or threat of impairment of one or more designated uses and the establishment of a TMDL is required. • 3045 water body/ pollutant combinations (2492 stream segment and 103 lake pollutant combinations ). The enclosure to this letter provides a more detailed description of EPA's approval rationale.
    [Show full text]
  • Deposition of Selenium and Other Constituents in Reservoir Bottom Sediment of the Solomon River Basin, North-Central Kansas
    Prepared in cooperation with the O'O BUREAU OF RECLAMATION Deposition of Selenium and Other Constituents in Reservoir Bottom Sediment of the Solomon River Basin, North-Central Kansas Water-Resources Investigations Report 99-4230 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey B. E. D. A. Dam overlooking Kirwin Reservoir B. Waconda Lake C. Webster Reservoir D. Kirwin National Wildlife Refuge E. Gravity corer mounted on pontoon boat (photographs A-D taken by author; photograph E taken by David P. Mau, U.S. Geological Survey, Lawrence, Kansas) U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Prepared in cooperation with the BUREAU OF RECLAMATION Deposition of Selenium and Other Constituents in Reservoir Bottom Sediment of the Solomon River Basin, North-Central Kansas By VICTORIA G. CHRISTENSEN Water-Resources Investigations Report 99-4230 Lawrence, Kansas 1999 U.S. Department of the Interior Bruce Babbitt, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director The use of brand, firm, or trade names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Information Services 4821 Quail Crest Place Building 810 Lawrence, KS 66049-3839 Box 25286, Federal Center Denver, CO 80225-0286 CONTENTS Abstract...............................................................................................................^ 1 Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Solomon River Subbasin
    Upper Solomon River Subbasin 2008 Field Analysis Summary Subbasin Water Resource Management Program Division of Water Resources Kansas Department of Agriculture nd 109 SW Ninth Street – 2 Floor Topeka, KS 66612-1283 785-296-6087 Table of Contents I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................3 II. Precipitation ................................................................................................................................5 III. Surface Water.............................................................................................................................6 IV. Groundwater ............................................................................................................................10 V. Water Use ..................................................................................................................................24 VI. Conclusions..............................................................................................................................25 VII. Appendix ................................................................................................................................25 Figures Figure 1: Solomon River Basin divided into subbasins .................................................................. 4 Figure 2: Upper Solomon Subbasin precipitation 1939-2007 ........................................................ 5 Figure 3: 2008 Monthly Average Precipitation .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Glen Elder SP
    YOU CAN HELP GLEN ELDER Help Glen Elder Shine! If you’re in a developed camp- ground please put all of your trash in one of the centrally- located trash dumpsters. In other camp and day-use areas, please take all of your trash with you. n the shores of the 13,000- buildings are open in all camp- on the weather. len acre Waconda Lake Glen grounds April–September. The A full service Marina provides THINGS TO REMEMBER GG OElder State Park offers Kanza shower building may be fuel, boat and slip rental, as well For permits, visit either the area office or one of the self- unmatched recreational opportu- open, beginning in April, to as boating, fishing and camping pay stations at each park entrance. Vehicle, camping, and nities. With its rural setting, Glen accommodate early season camp- supplies. (Apr. 1 – Oct. 31). utility permits are required year-round. Elder is a perfect place to relax. ing through the opening weekend lder Office hours are 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through E Modern restroom/shower of upland bird season, depending E Friday throughout the year. From Memorial Day to Labor Day weekend the office extends its hours and is open DAY USE seven days a week. In an emergency, contact the area State Park office or call the Mitchell County Sheriff at (785) 738-3523. The new Waconda Visitor & Education Center is a lent view. A modern, handicap-accessible fish cleaning must see. The Center’s highlights include Native station (open Apr.–Oct.), is located at the east dump sta- American history, the Waconda Springs, history of the tion.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register Nomination
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register Listed July 25, 2014 National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional certification comments, entries, and narrative items on continuation sheets if needed (NPS Form 10-900a). 1. Name of Property Historic name Brown’s Creek Tributary Masonry Arch Bridge Other names/site number Mitchell County Bridge B2N; FHWA Number 000620723203620; KHRI: 123-0000-00228 Name of related Multiple Property Listing New Deal-Era Resources of Kansas; Masonry Arch Bridges of Kansas 2. Location Street & number 2300 Mile on Road B not for publication City or town Glen Elder vicinity State Kansas Code KS County Mitchell Code 123 Zip code 67446 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this x nomination _ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property x_ meets _ does not meet the National Register Criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimation of Peak Streamflows for Unregulated Rural Streams in Kansas
    Prepared in cooperation with the KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Estimation of Peak Streamflows for Unregulated Rural Streams in Kansas Water-Resources Investigations Report 00–4079 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Photograph on cover is Kansas River at Wamego, Kansas, March 1997. U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Estimation of Peak Streamflows for Unregulated Rural Streams in Kansas By PATRICK P. RASMUSSEN and CHARLES A. PERRY Water-Resources Investigations Report 00–4079 Prepared in cooperation with the KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Lawrence, Kansas 2000 U.S. Department of the Interior Bruce Babbitt, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director The use of firm, trade, or brand names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: U.S. Geological Survey District Chief Information Services U.S. Geological Survey Building 810, Federal Center 4821 Quail Crest Place Box 25286 Lawrence, KS 66049–3839 Denver, CO 80225–0286 CONTENTS Abstract ................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose and Scope......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • R. D. Burnett and T. B. Reed Water-Resources Investigations Report 86-4064 Prepared in Cooperation with the Lawrence, Kansas
    AVAILABILITY OF WATER FOR IRRIGATION IN THE SOUTH FORK SOLOMON RIVER VALLEY, WEBSTER RESERVOIR TO WACONOA LAKE, NORTH-CENTRAL KANSAS By R. D. Burnett and T. B. Reed U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 86-4064 Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION and the KANSAS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Lawrence, Kansas 1986 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL MODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief Open-File Services Section U.S. Geological Survey Western Distribution Branch Water Resources Division U.S. Geological Survey 1950 Constant Avenue - Campus West Box 25425, Federal Center Lawrence, Kansas 66046 Denver, Colorado 80225 [Telephone: (913) 864-4321] [Telephone: (303) 236-7476] ii CONTENTS Page Abstract -------------------------------- 1 Introduction ------------------------------ l Purpose and scope ------------------------- l Location and description of study area --------------- 3 Methods of investigation ---------------------- 3 Well-numbering system ----------------------- 3 Acknowledgments -------------------------- 4 Water use -------------------------------- 4 Surface water --------------------------- 4 Ground water ---------------------------- 6 Hydrology of the aquifer ------------------------ 7 Description ---------------------------- 7 Inflow ------------------------------- Jl Outflow ------------------------------ 13 Ground-water and surface-water relationships ------------
    [Show full text]
  • KDWPT Kansas Designated Aquatic Nuisance Waters Table
    Kansas Department of Wildlife, Parks, and Tourism Kansas Designated Aquatic Nuisance Waters Tables Dated: July 24, 2014 Designated waters containing select prohibited species Kansas River Missouri River El Dorado Reservoir Walnut River from El Dorado Reservoir dam to Oklahoma Winfield City Lake Timber creek from Winfield City Lake dam to confluence of the Walnut River Cheney Reservoir North Fork Ninnescah River from Cheney Reservoir dam to confluence of the Arkansas River Arkansas River from Lincoln Street Dam in Wichita to Oklahoma state line Perry Reservoir Delaware River from Perry Reservoir dam to confluence of the Kansas River Marion Reservoir Cottonwood River from Marion Reservoir dam to confluence of the Neosho River John Redmond Reservoir Milford Reservoir Republican River from Milford Reservoir dam to confluence of the Smoky Hill River Jeffery Energy Center Make-up Lake Jeffery Energy Center Auxiliary Lake Council Grove City Lake Council Grove Reservoir Neosho River from Council Grove Reservoir dam to Oklahoma state line Kanopolis Reservoir Smoky Hill River from Kanopolis Reservoir dam to confluence of the Republican River Melvern Reservoir Marais des Cygnes River from Melvern Reservoir dam to Missouri state line Melvern Reservoir River Pond Melvern Reservoir Rearing Pond Wilson Reservoir Saline River from Wilson Reservoir dam to confluence of the Smoky Hill River Lake Afton Clearwater Creek to confluence of the Ninnescah River Coffey County Lake (Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation Lake) Kingman Hoover Pond Kingman State
    [Show full text]
  • By Robert D. Burnett Water-Resources Investigations
    PREDICTIVE SIMULATION OF ALTERNATIVES FOR MANAGING THE WATER RESOURCES OF NORTH FORK SOLOMON RIVER VALLEY BETWEEN KIRfolN DAM AND WACONDA LAKE, NORTH-CENTRAL KANSAS By Robert D. Burnett U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 84-4249 Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION Lawrence, Kansas 1984 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WILLIAM P. CLARK, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report can write to: be purchased from: District Chief Open-File Services Section U.S. Geological Survey Western Distribution Branch 1950 Constant Avenue - Campus West U.S. Geological Survey University of Kansas Box 25425, Federal Center Lawrence, KS 66046 Denver, Colorado 80225 [Telephone (913) 864-4321] [Telephone: (303) 236-7476] ii CONTENTS Page Abstract- ----------------------------- l Introduction- --------------------------- 2 Purpose and scope- ----------------------- 2 Location and description of study area ------------- 2 Well-numbering system- --------------------- 2 Acknowledgments- ------------------------ 5 Present stream-aquifer system ------------------- 5 Surface water- ------------------------- 5 Ground water -------------------------- 6 Mathematical simulation of stream-aquifer system- --------- 7 Numerical model- ------------------------ 7 Boundary conditions- ---------------------- 9 Discharging wells------------------------ 10 Canal and lateral flux--------------------- 10 Stream-aquifer flux- ---------------------- 12 Ground-water
    [Show full text]