DOCSLIB.ORG

Gartner Supply Chain Top 25 List

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gartner Supply Chain Top 25 List Gartner Supply Chain Top 25 List 2019 2018 Apple* Apple* Procter & Gamble* Procter & Gamble* Amazon.com* Amazon.com* McDonald’s* McDonald’s* Unilever* 1. Colgate-Palmolive 1. Unilever 2. Inditex 2. Inditex 3. Nestlé 3. Cisco Systems 4. PepsiCo 4. Colgate-Palmolive 5. Cisco Systems 5. Intel 6. Intel 6. Nike 7. HP Inc. 7. Nestle 8. Johnson & Johnson 8. PepsiCo 9. Starbucks 9. H&M 10. Nike 10. Starbucks 11. Schneider Electric 11. 3M 12. Diageo 12. Schneider Electric 13. Alibaba 13. Novo Nordisk 14. Walmart 14. HP Inc. 15. L’Oréal 15. L’Oréal 16. H&M 16. Diageo 17. 3M 17. Samsung Electronics 18. Novo Nordisk 18. Johnson & Johnson 19. Home Depot 19. BASF 20. Coca-Cola 20. Walmart Inc. 21. Samsung Electronics 21. Kimberly-Clark 22. BASF 22. Coca-Cola Company 23. Adidas 23. Home Depot 24. AkzoNobel 24. Adidas 25. BMW 25. BMW * Masters category: Highlights the accomplishments and capabilities of long-term supply chain leaders in the Top 25. Companies qualify for the Masters category if their composite score places them in the top 5 rankings for at least 7 out of the past 10 years. © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. CM_GBS_951569 Gartner Supply Chain Top 25 List 2017 2016 Apple* Apple* Procter & Gamble* Procter & Gamble* Amazon.com* 1. Unilever 1. Unilever 2. McDonald’s 2. McDonald’s 3. Inditex 3. Amazon.com 4. Cisco Systems 4. Intel 5. H&M 5. H&M 6. Intel 6. Inditex 7. Nestlé 7. Cisco Systems 8. Nike 8. Samsung Electronics 9. Colgate-Palmolive 9. The Coca-Cola Company 10. Starbucks 10. Nestlé 11. PepsiCo 11. Nike 12. 3M 12. Starbucks 13. Johnson & Johnson 13. Colgate-Palmolive 14. The Coca-Cola Company 14. 3M 15. Nokia 15. PepsiCo 16. BASF 16. Wal-Mart Stores 17. Schneider Electric 17. Hewlett-Packard 18. Wal-Mart Stores 18. Schneider Electric 19. HP Inc. 19. L’Oréal 20. L’Oréal 20. BASF 21. Kimberly-Clark 21. Johnson & Johnson 22. BMW 22. BMW 23. Diageo 23. GlaxoSmithKline 24. Lenovo 24. Kimberly-Clark 25. Samsung Electronics 25. Lenovo * Masters category: Highlights the accomplishments and capabilities of long-term supply chain leaders in the Top 25. Companies qualify for the Masters category if their composite score places them in the top 5 rankings for at least 7 out of the past 10 years. © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. CM_GBS_951569 Gartner Supply Chain Top 25 List 2015 2014 2013 Apple* Procter & Gamble* 1. Amazon.com 1. Unilever 1. Apple 2. McDonald’s 2. McDonald’s 2. McDonald’s 3. Unilever 3. Inditex 3. Amazon.com 4. Intel 4. Cisco Systems 4. Unilever 5. Inditex 5. H&M 5. Intel 6. Cisco Systems 6. Intel 6. P&G 7. H&M 7. Nestlé 7. Cisco Systems 8. Samsung Electronics 8. Nike 8. Samsung Electronics 9. Colgate-Palmolive 9. Colgate-Palmolive 9. The Coca-Cola Company 10. Nike 10. Starbucks 10. Colgate-Palmolive 11. The Coca-Cola Company 11. PepsiCo 11. Dell 12. Starbucks 12. 3M 12. Inditex 13. Wal-Mart Stores 13. Johnson & Johnson 13. Wal-Mart Stores 14. 3M 14. The Coca-Cola Company 14. Nike 15. PepsiCo 15. Nokia 15. Starbucks 16. Seagate Technology 16. BASF 16. PepsiCo 17. Nestlé 17. Schneider Electric 17. H&M 18. Lenovo 18. Wal-Mart Stores 18. Caterpillar 19. Qualcomm 19. HP Inc. 19. 3M 20. Kimberly-Clark 20. L’Oréal 20. Lenovo Group 21. Johnson & Johnson 21. Kimberly-Clark 21. Nestlé 22. L’Oréal 22. BMW 22. Ford Motor 23. Cummins 23. Diageo 23. Cummins 24. Toyota Motor 24. Lenovo 24. Qualcomm 25. Home Depot 25. Samsung Electronics 25. Johnson & Johnson * Masters category: Highlights the accomplishments and capabilities of long-term supply chain leaders in the Top 25. Companies qualify for the Masters category if their composite score places them in the top 5 rankings for at least 7 out of the past 10 years. © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. CM_GBS_951569 26 – 50 Rankings 2019 2018 26. British American Tobacco 26. Lenovo 27. DowDuPont 27. Reckitt Benckiser 28. Kimberly-Clark 28. Nokia 29. Nokia 29. British American Tobacco 30. Toyota 30. Danone 31. Roche Holding 31. Cummins 32. Dell Technologies 32. GlaxoSmithKline 33. General Mills 33. Roche Holding 34. Lenovo 34. Philip Morris International 35. Caterpillar 35. Huawei Technologies 36. Gap 36. Gap 37. Lockheed Martin 37. Bayer 38. Danone 38. Novartis 39. Huawei Technologies 39. Toyota 40. Pfizer 40. Siemens 41. Novartis 41. Haier 42. Cummins 42. General Mills 43. Best Buy 43. Henkel 44. Target 44. Lockheed Martin 45. Haier 45. Dow Chemical 46. Reckitt Benckiser 46. Pfizer 47. GlaxoSmithKline 47. Caterpillar 48. Siemens 48. Kellogg 49. Heineken Holding 49. AstraZeneca 50. General Motors 50. Best Buy © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. CM_GBS_951569 26 – 50 Rankings 2017 2016 26. Huawei Technologies 26. Caterpillar 27. Home Depot 27. Seagate Technology 28. Reckitt Benckiser 28. Nokia 29. GlaxoSmithKline 29. Dow Chemical 30. Gap 30. Reckitt Benckiser 31. Toyota 31. Diageo 32. Dow Chemical 32. Gap 33. Cummins 33. Philip Morris International 34. Lockheed Martin 34. Home Depot 35. Adidas 35. British American Tobacco 36. Roche Holding 36. Amgen 37. Caterpillar 37. Toyota Motor 38. Siemens 38. Woolworths 39. British American Tobacco 39. Cummins 40. Novartis 40. Ahold 41. Danone 41. Huawei Technologies 42. Bayer 42. Hyundai Motor 43. Amgen 43. Bayer 44. Medtronic 44. Lockheed Martin 45. AbbVie 45. Adidas 46. General Mills 46. AbbVie 47. AstraZeneca 47. Qualcomm 48. Seagate Technology 48. Novartis 49. CVS Health 49. Danone 50. Best Buy 50. SCA © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. CM_GBS_951569 26 – 50 Rankings 2015 2014 2013 26. Caterpillar 26. L’Oréal 26. Kimberly-Clark 27. Diageo 27. Ford Motor 27. BASF 28. Reckitt Benckiser 28. Deere & Co 28. John Deere 29. BMW 29. DuPont 29. BMW 30. HP 30. AbbVie 30. DuPont 31. Huawei 31. BMW 31. Volkswagen Group 32. Delphi Automotive 32. General Mills 32. Haier 33. General Mills 33. Kraft Foods Group 33. Hyundai Motor 34. Schneider Electric 34. GlaxoSmithKline 34. Kraft Foods Group 35. Monsanto 35. Diageo 35. General Mills 36. BASF 36. Toyota Motor 36. Tata Motors 37. DuPont 37. Home Depot 37. AstraZeneca 38. British American Tobacco 38. Ahold 38. Northrop Grumman 39. Anheuser-Busch InBev 39. Delphi Automotive 39. Costco 40. Woolworths 40. BASF 40. Avnet 41. Pfizer 41. Hyundai Motor 41. Danone 42. GlaxoSmithKline 42. Estée Lauder 42. L’Oréal 43. Boeing 43. Volkswagen AG 43. Syngenta 44. Schlumberger 44. Northrop Grumman 44. Emerson 45. Ford 45. Reckitt Benckiser 45. British American Tobacco 46. John Deere 46. Syngenta 46. Texas Instruments 47. AmerisourceBergen 47. Hewlett-Packard 47. Dow Chemical 48. Dollar General 48. Pfizer 48. Tesco 49. Northrop Grumman 49. Huawei Technologies 49. Diageo 50. Amgen 50. Boeing 50. Lilly © 2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. CM_GBS_951569.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ishares Core EURO STOXX 50 UCITS
    iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EXW1 (DE) August Factsheet Performance, Portfolio Breakdowns, Net Asset information as at: 31-Aug-2021 All other data as at: 07-Sep-2021 Investors should read the Key Investor Information Document and Prospectus prior to investing. Capital at risk. All financial investments involve an element of risk. Therefore, the value The Fund seeks to track the performance of an index composed of 50 of the largest companies in of your investment and the income from it will the Eurozone. vary and your initial investment amount cannot be guaranteed. KEY BENEFITS KEY FACTS 1 Exposure to the 50 largest companies from developed Eurozone countries Asset Class Equity Fund Base Currency EUR 2 Direct investment into blue-chip companies representative of leaders in the Eurozone Share Class Currency EUR Fund Launch Date 27-Dec-2000 3 Exposure to regional and large market capitalisation companies Share Class Launch Date 27-Dec-2000 Benchmark EURO STOXX® 50 Key Risks: Investment risk is concentrated in specific sectors, countries, currencies or companies. ISIN DE0005933956 This means the Fund is more sensitive to any localised economic, market, political or regulatory Total Expense Ratio 0.10% Distribution Type Up to 4x per year events. The value of equities and equity-related securities can be affected by daily stock market Domicile Germany movements. Other influential factors include political, economic news, company earnings and Methodology Replicated significant corporate events. Counterparty Risk: The insolvency of any institutions providing Product Structure Physical services such as safekeeping of assets or acting as counterparty to derivatives or other Rebalance Frequency Quarterly instruments, may expose the Fund to financial loss.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Governance
    Strategic report Governance and remuneration Financial statements Investor information Corporate Governance In this section Chairman’s Governance statement 78 The Board 80 Corporate Executive Team 83 Board architecture 85 Board roles and responsibilities 86 Board activity and principal decisions 87 Our purpose, values and culture 90 The Board’s approach to engagement 91 Board performance 94 Board Committee information 96 Our Board Committee reports 97 Section 172 statement 108 Directors’ report 109 GSK Annual Report 2020 77 Chairman’s Governance statement In last year’s Governance statement, I explained that our primary Education and focus on Science objective for 2020 was to ensure there was clarity between the Given the critical importance of strengthening the pipeline, Board and management on GSK’s execution of strategy and its the Board has benefitted from devoting a higher proportion of operational priorities. We have aligned our long-term priorities its time in understanding the science behind our strategy and of Innovation, Performance and Trust powered by culture testing its application. It is important that the Board has a and agreed on the metrics to measure delivery against them. working understanding of the key strategic themes upon The Board’s annual cycle of meetings ensures that all major which our R&D strategy is based. These themes have been components of our strategy are reviewed over the course complemented by Board R&D science thematic deep dives. of the year. Our focus was on the fundamentals of our strategy: human The COVID-19 pandemic impacted and dominated all our genetics, the immune system and AI and ML, as well as to lives for the majority of 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • First Name Last Name Title Doug Abbott Melt/Cast Electrical Super
    First Name Last Name Title Doug Abbott Melt/Cast Electrical Super Charles Abbott #1 Mill Superintendent Wilson Abbott Project Manager Mohamed Abdelshafy Quality Mgr Keizo Abe General Manager Takeshi Abe Markus Abel Senior Expert Steelmaking Steve Abernathy Sunday Abraham Principal Research Enginee Mark Abraham Staff Mohamed Abumosaed Operation Mgr John Accurso Process Engineer Gesser Achim Steven Acker Jason Adair Melting Shift Supervisor Michael Adam Chris Adams Danny Adams Melt Shop Caster Foreman Jeffrey Adams Director of Safety Marlon Adams General Supervisor, Furnac Tony Adams Technical Sales Manager Sam Adams Chris Addison Larry Addkison Michael Adducci District Sales Manager Giovanni Adduci Mark Ader General Sales Manager Allan Adkins Marketing and Sales Manager Tim Adler West Regional Sales Manager Mikael Adolfsson Kuldeep Agarwal Anwar Aglan Cesar Agostino MOHAMED MAZEEM AHAMED IMRAN Frank Ahrenhold Director Steelmaking Federico Ahualli Operations Director Rajiv Ahuja President / CEO David Ahwesh Hiroshi Aida Tomoyuki Aizawa Lal Ajwani Sales Manager Canada Steve Aker Operations Mgr Andy Akers Liam Akins Satoru Akutsu Faishl Alahmadi Specialist Constantno Alarcon Head of Sales Department Ali Jaber Al-Athba Manager Cem Alaybeyoglu Denis Albayrak Mohammed Al-Bedour Vice President Robert Albert Principal Engineer Robert Albert Project Manager William Alder Maher Al-Dojayli Engineering Specialist Sammuel Aleixo Student James Alesia Safety Coordinator Bradley Alexander Unit Manager R.D. Alexander General Manager Tony Alexander Gianluca Aliotta Yassin Alkazaz YUSUF alkhatib MANAGER William Allan Principal Jason Allen lloyd allen Chris Allen Guarding Technician Mike Allen Sr Sales Manager Jean Allen Marcus Allhands Tony Allor Mike Allor Michael Almeraz Michael Almli Eric Almquist Engineer/Sales Ann Almstedt Vice President Niklas Almstedt President Majed AlRashedi Manager Saad Alshammary Sr.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Social Ceo Report
    2016 SOCIAL CEO REPORT Are Fortune 500 CEOs as digitally engaged as they should be? #socialceo SPONSORED BY: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / 03 MAJOR FINDINGS / 04 LINKEDIN / 07 TWITTER / 08 FACEBOOK / 09 INSTAGRAM / 10 YOUTUBE AND GOOGLE+ / 11 YEAR-OVER-YEAR ANALYSIS / 12 ABOUT THE RESEARCH / 13 THE CHALLENGE / 14 A WORD FROM OUR SPONSOR / 15 HOW WE DID IT We identifed the social profles of every CEO on the Fortune 500 list across the six most popular networks: Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, Google+, Instagram, and YouTube. We weighed the legitimacy of these social profles against a strict set of criteria to ensure consistency in reporting. You can read more about our methodology at the end of the report. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2016 has been an interesting year Despite calls from many social media for the leading social media channels evangelists for CEOs to increase their as they vie for subscribers and use of social media, not much has infuencers, to grow advertising changed since 2015. While LinkedIn’s revenues. The past year has seen Infuencer program seems to be the strategic acquisition of LinkedIn gaining traction with CEOs, and by Microsoft. Meanwhile, YouTube Twitter use is also on the rise, continued to evolve and grow as a Facebook, Google+, Instagram, and streaming video platform, with YouTube remain the top choices for potential competitors—Facebook Live, corporate marketing teams to present LinkedIn Infuencer videos, Twitter’s corporate messaging. Periscope—vying to capture users. LinkedIn remains the frst channel CEOs adopt, followed by Twitter. 60% of Fortune 500 CEOs have LinkedIn’s Infuencer program no social media presence at all, features some of the most active compared to 61% in 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013--Annual-Report-Accounts.Pdf
    Helping people make measurable progress in their lives through learning ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2013 OUR TRANSFORMATION To find out more about how we are transforming our business go to page 09 EFFICACY To find out more about our focus on efficacy go to page 14 OUR PERFORMANCE For an in-depth analysis of our performance in 2013 go to page 19 Pearson is the world’s leading learning company, with 40,000 employees in more than 80 countries working to help people of all ages to make measurable progress in their lives through learning. We provide learning materials, technologies, assessments and services to teachers and students in order to help people everywhere aim higher and fulfil their true potential. We put the learner at the centre of everything we do. READ OUR REPORT ONLINE Learn more www.pearson.com/ar2013.html/ar2013.html To stay up to date wwithith PPearsonearson throughout the year,r, visit ouourr blog at blog.pearson.comn.com and follow us on Twitteritter – @pearsonplc 01 Heading one OVERVIEW Overview 02 Financial highlights A summary of who we are and what 04 Chairman’s introduction 1 we do, including performance highlights, 06 Our business models our business strategy and key areas of 09 Chief executive’s strategic overview investment and focus. 14 Pearson’s commitment to efficacy OUR PERFORMANCE OUR Our performance 19 Our performance An in-depth analysis of how we 20 Outlook 2014 2 performed in 2013, the outlook 23 Education: North America, International, Professional for 2014 and the principal risks and 32 Financial Times Group uncertainties affecting our businesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Rb-Annual-Report-2012.Pdf
    Reckitt Benckiser Group plc Reckitt Benckiser Group Healthier Happier Annual Report and Financial Statements 2012 Stronger Reckitt Benckiser Group plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2012 Contents 1 Chairman’s Statement 2 Chief Executive’s Statement 10 Business Review 2012 18 Board of Directors and Executive Committee 19 Report of the Directors 22 Chairman’s Statement on Corporate Governance 24 Corporate Governance Report 30 Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities 31 Directors’ Remuneration Report 38 Independent Auditors’ Report to the members of Reckitt Benckiser Group plc 39 Group income statement 39 Group statement of comprehensive income 40 Group balance sheet 41 Group statement of changes in equity 42 Group cash flow statement 43 Notes to the financial statements 75 Five-year summary 76 Parent Company – Independent Auditors’ Report to the members of Reckitt Benckiser Group plc 77 Parent Company balance sheet 78 Notes to the Parent Company financial statements 84 Shareholder information Chairman’s Statement largest consumer health care category in The Board conducted its regular reviews the world with the acquisition of Schiff of the Company’s brands, geographic area Nutrition International, Inc. (Schiff) and and functional performance together with its leading US brands in the vitamins, detailed reviews of its human resources. minerals and supplements market. There The Board also completed its annual were also a few disposals of non core assessment of corporate governance assets. Net debt at the end of 2012, after including Board performance, corporate paying for dividends, net acquisitions and responsibility, and reputational and organisation restructuring, stood at business risk. £2,426m (2011: £1,795m). AGM Resolutions Your Board proposes an increase in the final The resolutions, which will be voted dividend of +11%, taking it to 78p per upon at our AGM of 2 May 2013 are share, and bringing the total dividend for fully explained in the Notice of Meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • To Arrive at the Total Scores, Each Company Is Marked out of 10 Across
    BRITAIN’S MOST ADMIRED COMPANIES THE RESULTS 17th last year as it continues to do well in the growing LNG business, especially in Australia and Brazil. Veteran chief executive Frank Chapman is due to step down in the new year, and in October a row about overstated reserves hit the share price. Some pundits To arrive at the total scores, each company is reckon BG could become a take over target as a result. The biggest climber in the top 10 this year is marked out of 10 across nine criteria, such as quality Petrofac, up to fifth from 68th last year. The oilfield of management, value as a long-term investment, services group may not be as well known as some, but it is doing great business all the same. Its boss, Syrian- financial soundness and capacity to innovate. Here born Ayman Asfari, is one of the growing band of are the top 10 firms by these individual measures wealthy foreign entrepreneurs who choose to make London their operating base and home, to the benefit of both the Exchequer and the employment figures. In fourth place is Rolls-Royce, one of BMAC’s most Financial value as a long-term community and environmental soundness investment responsibility consistent high performers. Hardly a year goes past that it does not feature in the upper reaches of our table, 1= Rightmove 9.00 1 Diageo 8.61 1 Co-operative Bank 8.00 and it has topped its sector – aero and defence engi- 1= Rotork 9.00 2 Berkeley Group 8.40 2 BASF (UK & Ireland) 7.61 neering – for a decade.
    [Show full text]
  • Keurig to Acquire Dr Pepper Snapple for $18.7Bn in Cash
    Find our latest analyses and trade ideas on bsic.it Coffee and Soda: Keurig to acquire Dr Pepper Snapple for $18.7bn in cash Dr Pepper Snapple Group (NYSE:DPS) – market cap as of 17/02/2018: $28.78bn Introduction On January 29, 2018, Keurig Green Mountain, the coffee group owned by JAB Holding, announced the acquisition of soda maker Dr Pepper Snapple Group. Under the terms of the reverse takeover, Keurig will pay $103.75 per share in a special cash dividend to Dr Pepper shareholders, who will also retain 13 percent of the combined company. The deal will pay $18.7bn in cash to shareholders in total and create a massive beverage distribution network in the U.S. About Dr Pepper Snapple Group Incorporated in 2007 and headquartered in Plano (Texas), Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. manufactures and distributes non-alcoholic beverages in the United States, Mexico and the Caribbean, and Canada. The company operates through three segments: Beverage Concentrates, Packaged Beverages, and Latin America Beverages. It offers flavored carbonated soft drinks (CSDs) and non-carbonated beverages (NCBs), including ready-to-drink teas, juices, juice drinks, mineral and coconut water, and mixers, as well as manufactures and sells Mott's apple sauces. The company sells its flavored CSD products primarily under the Dr Pepper, Canada Dry, Peñafiel, Squirt, 7UP, Crush, A&W, Sunkist soda, Schweppes, RC Cola, Big Red, Vernors, Venom, IBC, Diet Rite, and Sun Drop; and NCB products primarily under the Snapple, Hawaiian Punch, Mott's, FIJI, Clamato, Bai, Yoo- Hoo, Deja Blue, ReaLemon, AriZona tea, Vita Coco, BODYARMOR, Mr & Mrs T mixers, Nantucket Nectars, Garden Cocktail, Mistic, and Rose's brand names.
    [Show full text]
  • Quaker Sees an ROI of Over 6X by Reaching Amazon Shoppers on Amazon and Across the Web1
    Case Study Amazon.com | Amazon Advertising Platform (AAP) Quaker sees an ROI of over 6X by reaching Amazon shoppers on Amazon and across the web1 The Quaker Oats company, a leading manufacturer of packaged grocery The AMG Solution foods and subsidiary of PepsiCo, Inc., worked with Amazon Media Quaker and AMG launched a campaign using custom Group (AMG) to drive purchase considerations and sales of Quaker coupon ads that ran on Amazon.com and amplified Oatmeal Squares Cereal. They assumed the AMG campaign would campaign reach with the Amazon Advertising Platform deliver on their objectives on Amazon, but they were also interested (AAP). The AMG campaign also revealed exact groups in learning what effect the campaign would have on offline sales in of Amazon customers who were who were most likely traditional brick and mortar stores. Through a mix of standard AMG to take action after exposure to their ads such as those post-campaign measurements and AMG’s partnership with Nielsen who were in-market for other grocery products. With HomeScan, Quaker was able to better understand the effect of their carefully targeted ads served across Amazon and campaign on key success metrics – both on and offline. AAP, Quaker maximized exposure among groups that mattered most, yielding a strong ROI. Online Success Metrics Total Campaign ROI For every $1 spent on advertising with Amazon, Quaker recognized over $6 in incremental sales Offline Sales Boost ¡ 26% lift in offline sales as a result of the on-Amazon portion of the campaign ¡ 29% lift in offline sales as a result of the AAP portion of the campaign On-Amazon Success Metrics On average, users who were exposed to Quaker ads were: ¡ 5x more likely to consider Quaker Oatmeal Squares versus those who weren’t ¡ Almost 2x more likely to purchase Quaker Oatmeal Squares versus those who weren’t About The Quaker Oats Company: The Quaker Oats Company, headquartered in Chicago, is a Methodology unit of PepsiCo, Inc., one of the world’s largest consumer packaged goods companies.
    [Show full text]
  • Gartner Magic Quadrant for Sales and Operations Planning Systems Of
    16/09/2019 Gartner Reprint Licensed for Distribution Magic Quadrant for Sales and Operations Planning Systems of Differentiation Published 7 May 2019 - ID G00332362 - 81 min read By Analysts Tim Payne, Amber Salley, Alex Pradhan This Magic Quadrant examines the main vendors that provide S&OP systems of differentiation. Supply chain leaders responsible for supply chain solutions can use this report when evaluating and selecting such SODs to help enable Stage 4 or higher S&OP maturity for their businesses. Market Definition/Description This Magic Quadrant is focused on analyzing the market for sales and operations planning (S&OP) systems of differentiation (SODs). An S&OP SOD is a software solution that helps to enable a Stage 4 (or possibly higher) maturity S&OP process. It may do this in conjunction with other supply chain planning (SCP) SODs, such as supply chain modeling, multienterprise inventory optimization or demand sensing. It will require the support of a foundational SCP system of record (SOR) if the full value of the S&OP SOD is to be extracted by the company. For more details on SCP SORs, see “Magic Quadrant for Supply Chain Planning System of Record.” Gartner research reveals that the best way for companies to analyze SCP technology and find the best fit for their requirements is to consider three key questions: ■ What type and level of planning (decision making) is the business looking to support now and in the future? For example, short-term respond planning or longer-term configure planning (see the Context section under “The SCP CORE model” for more definitions).
    [Show full text]
  • Collaboration, Innovation, Transformation Ideas and Inspiration to Accelerate Sustainable Growth - a Value Chain Approach
    Collaboration, innovation, transformation Ideas and inspiration to accelerate sustainable growth - A value chain approach WBCSD_SVC_Guide_PRINT_A4_40_pages_v16_2011_12_08.indd 1 08/12/2011 15:20 About this document Over the next few decades, businesses will face many challenges related to the environmental sustainability of their value chains (i.e. the full life cycle of a product or service) – whether it’s meeting new environmental regulations, securing enough water, energy or other resources for their daily operations, or managing the needs and expectations of their stakeholders. Meeting today’s challenges, while at the same time planning for future needs, is difficult. That’s why the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) has developed this guide. The guide is designed as a practical “how-to” tool, providing both ideas and inspiration to help businesses improve the environmental sustainability of their value chains. Using a practical step-by-step approach, it outlines the concrete actions businesses can take today to become more environmentally sustainable, along with examples from WBCSD member companies that have already successfully adopted a Sustainable Value Chain approach. The guide was developed by the WBCSD’s Sustainable Value Chain Workstream, with leadership from Unilever and The Coca-Cola Company. It includes case studies from AkzoNobel, The Coca-Cola Company, Henkel, Philips, Procter & Gamble, SABIC, Solvay, Sompo Japan Insurance, TNT, Umicore and Unilever. WBCSD_SVC_Guide_PRINT_A4_40_pages_v16_2011_12_08.indd
    [Show full text]
  • Consumption-Based Infrastructure: a Game Changer
    January 2019 Consumption-based Infrastructure: A Game Changer In this issue Why Consumption-based Datacenter Infrastructure Pricing is a Game Changer 2 Research from Gartner: How to Get the Best Returns From Consumption-Based, On-Premises Infrastructure 4 Consumption-based Infrastructure Pricing: A Game Changer Kaminario’s composable storage platform offers cloud application providers a solution for delivering the performance and capability of shared storage and the economic elasticity of the public cloud. This paper discusses the rise of consumption-based pricing and the potential of technology solutions like Kaminario’s to transform datacenter economics. Cloud-First IT Strategies Enterprise IT has been transformed by modern cloud technologies. SaaS is dominating the enterprise software market. Certain workloads, like filesharing and backup, are quickly moving to public cloud- based services. Wherever possible, enterprise IT organizations are minimizing their datacenter footprint, leveraging external service providers, and getting out of the business of owning their own datacenter infrastructure. While SaaS and IaaS offerings make sense for many enterprise IT use cases, critical applications often benefit from dedicated, optimized private cloud infrastructures maintained on premises or in shared colocation facilities. While private clouds leverage dedicated infrastructure, software composable storage solutions with consumption-based pricing offer a solution for building cloud-scale datacenter infrastructures with the elastic economics of the public cloud. The ability to scale up and scale down as IT demands change enables businesses to better match infrastructure expense with the value they deliver and the revenue they generate. 3 Utility Pricing for IT Technologies Kaminario is differentiated from traditional storage The concept of utility pricing for IT infrastructure technologies in its complete disaggregation of its has been around for years.
    [Show full text]