Travel Medicine for Divers
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Verification of Vulnerable Zones Identified Under the Nitrate Directive \ and Sensitive Areas Identified Under the Urban Waste W
CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 THE URBAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT DIRECTIVE (91/271/EEC) 1 1.2 THE NITRATES DIRECTIVE (91/676/EEC) 3 1.3 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY 4 2 THE OFFICIAL GREEK DESIGNATION PROCESS 9 2.1 OVERVIEW OF THE CURRENT SITUATION IN GREECE 9 2.2 OFFICIAL DESIGNATION OF SENSITIVE AREAS 10 2.3 OFFICIAL DESIGNATION OF VULNERABLE ZONES 14 1 INTRODUCTION This report is a review of the areas designated as Sensitive Areas in conformity with the Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive 91/271/EEC and Vulnerable Zones in conformity with the Nitrates Directive 91/676/EEC in Greece. The review also includes suggestions for further areas that should be designated within the scope of these two Directives. Although the two Directives have different objectives, the areas designated as sensitive or vulnerable are reviewed simultaneously because of the similarities in the designation process. The investigations will focus upon: • Checking that those waters that should be identified according to either Directive have been; • in the case of the Nitrates Directive, assessing whether vulnerable zones have been designated correctly and comprehensively. The identification of vulnerable zones and sensitive areas in relation to the Nitrates Directive and Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive is carried out according to both common and specific criteria, as these are specified in the two Directives. 1.1 THE URBAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT DIRECTIVE (91/271/EEC) The Directive concerns the collection, treatment and discharge of urban wastewater as well as biodegradable wastewater from certain industrial sectors. The designation of sensitive areas is required by the Directive since, depending on the sensitivity of the receptor, treatment of a different level is necessary prior to discharge. -
Comparison of T1 FLAIR BLADE with and Without Parallel Imaging Against T1 Turbo Spin Echo in the MR Imaging of Lumbar Spine in the Sagittal Plane
Lavdas et al., J Radiat Res Imaging 2021; Journal of Radiation Research and 1(1):33-40. Imaging Research Article Comparison of T1 FLAIR BLADE with and without parallel imaging against T1 turbo spin echo in the MR imaging of lumbar spine in the sagittal plane Eleftherios Lavdas1,2, Eleonora Giankou3, Panos Papanikolaou4, Aleksandra Tsikrika5, Maria Papaioannou2, Violeta Roka6, Vasiliki Chatzigeorgiou3, Georgios Batsikas3, Spiros Kostopoulos7, Dimitrios Glotsos7, Athanasios Bakas1, Panayiotis Mavroidis8* 1University of West Attica, Department Abstract of Biomedical Sciences, Athens, Greece Purpose: Spinal cord and nerves are best visualized by MRI, which is able to show structural and functional 2Animus Kyanoys Stavros, Department anomalies of the spine. The primary objective of this study is to identify advantages or disadvantages of of Radiology, Larissa, Greece the T1-weighted fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequence with BLADE technique (T1W-FLAIR BLADE), with and without parallel imaging when compared with T1 Turbo Spin Echo (T1 TSE) sequence 3Department of Medical Imaging, IASO Thessalias Hospital, Larissa, Greece when performing MRI examination of the lumbar spine in a sagittal view. 4Long School of Medicine, University Methods: L-spine examinations with T1W-FLAIR BLADE (with and without parallel imaging) and T1 TSE of Texas Health at San Antonio, San were acquired on 44 patients using a 1.5T scanner. These sequences were assessed by two radiologists Antonio, TX, USA a) quantitatively by comparing the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and relative contrast (ReCon) measurements and b) qualitatively based on different features of the images such as 5 Department of Radiology, University cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) nulling. -
Areas “Affected” by Malaria in Greece 2019 Season, May 2019
1 Areas “affected” by malaria in Greece 2019 season, May 2019 The “Working Group (WG) for the designation of areas affected by vector-borne diseases” of the National Committee for the Prevention and Control of Tropical Diseases of the Ministry of Health has convened and decided upon which areas should be designated as “affected”, following the recording of an introduced P.vivax malaria case (1st generation of transmission) in 2019. The WG of experts has carefully examined the following data: the total epidemiological data concerning malaria in Greece since 2009, the number and characteristics of all cases reported to the National Public Health Organization (N.P.H.O.) up to 24th May 2019, the characteristics of the population to which they correspond, and the geomorphological characteristics of the corresponding areas, the available entomological data for the years 2011-2019, especially for the area with the introduced case, and the literature concerning the flight range of mosquito vectors, especially Anopheles sacharovi, which is considered to be the main malaria vector in our country. According to the suggestion of European experts, an “affected area” is defined as falling within a radius of 2-6 km around the probable place of exposure of the locally acquired cases. In Greece, an affected area is usually defined by a radius of 6 km around the probable place of exposure. However, if this defined circle includes sections of large urban centres or cities (that cannot be easily divided) or if a smaller radius is deemed adequate (e.g. based on entomological data, history of cases in an area, geomorphology, etc.), the WG - following risk assessment – decides upon the exact designation of the affected area. -
Asset Technology Employment-Entrepreneurship
A sset T echn o lo gy Em plo ym en t-E ntrepreneurship Projects ASSET TECHNOLOGY PROMOTION OF EMPLOYMENT AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP DEVELOPMENT OF THE SOCIAL ECONOMY SECTOR “Local Action Plan for the Integration of Vulnerable Groups - Disabled people, of the Municipalities of Ilion and Agii Anargiri-Kamatero” Development Partnership: ERGAXIA Area of Intervention: Municipalities of Ilion and Agii Anargiri - Kamatero Target Group: People with disabilities http://www.ergaxia.gr “Local Action Plan for the Social Integration of Vulnerable Groups of the Municipality of Pylos-Nestor” Development Partnership: PALAIPYLOS Area of Intervention: Municipality of Pylos-Nestor Target Group: Long term unemployed over the age of 45, unemployed living in poverty http://www.palaipylos.gr/ “Local Action Plan for the Social Integration of Vulnerable Groups of the Municipalities of Argithea, Mouzaki, Palamas, Sofades” Development Partnership: KIERION Area of Intervention: Municipalities of Argithea, Mouzaki, Palamas, Sofades / Karditsa Regional Unit Target Group: Long term unemployed over the age of 45, unemployed living in poverty http://www.topeko-kierion.gr/ “Local Action Plan for the Social Integration of Vulnerable Groups of Thesprotia” Development Partnership: THESPROTIAN SOCIAL COOPERATION Area of Intervention: Regional Unit of Thesprotia Target Group: Long term unemployed over the age of 45, unemployed living in poverty http://www.thekoisi.gr/ “Local Action Plan for Employment «HERMES»” Development Partnership: TOPSA HERMES Area of Intervention: Regional Unit of Thessaloniki Target Group: Unemployed women and young people, young scientists http://www.topsa-hermes.gr/ “Local Action Plan for the Development of Employment in Amfiloxia” Development Partnership: D.P. Amfiloxia Area of Intervention: Municipality of Amfiloxia Target Group: Unemployed women and young people, young scientists and farmers http://www.topsa-amfiloxia.gr/ “Local Action Plan for the Development of Employment in Sikionion Municipality” Development Partnership: D.P. -
DKV Stations, Sorted by City
You drive, we care. GR - Diesel & Services Griechenland / Ellás / Greece Sortiert nach Ort Sorted by city » For help, call me! DKV ASSIST - 24h International Free Call* 00800 365 24 365 In case of difficulties concerning the number 00800 please dial the relevant emergency number of the country: Bei unerwarteten Schwierigkeiten mit der Rufnummer 00800, wählen Sie bitte die Notrufnummer des Landes: Andorra / Andorra Latvia / Lettland » +34 934 6311 81 » +370 5249 1109 Austria / Österreich Liechtenstein / Liechtenstein » +43 362 2723 03 » +39 047 2275 160 Belarus / Weißrussland Lithuania / Litauen » 8 820 0071 0365 (national) » +370 5249 1109 » +7 495 1815 306 Luxembourg / Luxemburg Belgium / Belgien » +32 112 5221 1 » +32 112 5221 1 North Macedonia / Nordmazedonien Bosnia-Herzegovina / Bosnien-Herzegowina » +386 2616 5826 » +386 2616 5826 Moldova / Moldawien Bulgaria / Bulgarien » +386 2616 5826 » +359 2804 3805 Montenegro / Montenegro Croatia / Kroatien » +386 2616 5826 » +386 2616 5826 Netherlands / Niederlande Czech Republic / Tschechische Republik » +49 221 8277 9234 » +420 2215 8665 5 Norway / Norwegen Denmark / Dänemark » +47 221 0170 0 » +45 757 2774 0 Poland / Polen Estonia / Estland » +48 618 3198 82 » +370 5249 1109 Portugal / Portugal Finland / Finnland » +34 934 6311 81 » +358 9622 2631 Romania / Rumänien France / Frankreich » +40 264 2079 24 » +33 130 5256 91 Russia / Russland Germany / Deutschland » 8 800 7070 365 (national) » +49 221 8277 564 » +7 495 1815 306 Great Britain / Großbritannien Serbia / Serbien » 0 800 1975 520 -
Karditsa’S Ecosystem of Collaboration Greece
Resituating the Local in Cohesion and Territorial Development Case Study Report Karditsa’s Ecosystem of Collaboration Greece Authors: UTH Research Team Report Information Title: Case Study Report: Karditsa’s Ecosystem of Collaboration, Greece (RELOCAL Deliverable 6.2) Authors: George Petrakos, Lefteris Topaloglou, Aggeliki Anagnostou, Victor Cupcea Contributions from: UTH Research Team Version: 2 Date of Publication: 29.03.2019 Dissemination level: Public Project Information Project Acronym RELOCAL Project Full title: Resituating the Local in Cohesion and Territorial Develop- ment Grant Agreement: 727097 Project Duration: 48 months Project coordinator: UEF Bibliographic Information Petrakos G, Topaloglou L, Anagnostou A and Cupcea V (2019) Karditsa’s Ecosystem of Collaboration, Greece. RELOCAL Case Study N° 6/33. Joensuu: University of Eastern Finland. Information may be quoted provided the source is stated accurately and clearly. Reproduction for own/internal use is permitted. This paper can be downloaded from our website: https://relocal.eu i Table of Contents List of Figures ........................................................................................................................................ iii List of Maps & Photos ......................................................................................................................... iii List of Tables ......................................................................................................................................... iii Abbreviations ...................................................................................................................................... -
GOVERNMENT GAZETTE Series B- 5922/31.12.2018
69941 GREEK GOVERNMENT GAZETTE Series B- 5922/31.12.2018 TRUE COPY 69941 OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT Greek Government Gazette December 31st 2018 SERIES B Issue No. 5922 Β' 464/19-4-2010). DECISIONS 9. The provisions of ministerial decision “Natural Gas Dec. No 1314/2018 Licensing Regulation” ref. no. 178065 (Government Gazette Β' 3430/17.08.2018, hereinafter referred to as For the granting of a Natural Gas Distribution “Licensing Regulation”). License to the company under the trade name 10. The Tariffs Regulation for the Main Distribution “Gas Distribution Company Thessaloniki- Activity of distribution networks in Attica, Thessaloniki, Thessaly S.A.” and the distinctive title “EDA Thessaly and other Greece (Government Gazette Β' THESS”. 3067/26.09.2016) (hereinafter referred to as “Tariffs Regulation”). THE REGULATORY AUTHORITY FOR ENERGY 11. The RAE's Decision No 346/2016 on the Approval Taking into consideration the following: of the Tariff for the Charge of the Main Natural Gas 1. The provisions of Law 4001/2011 “For the Distribution Activity on Thessaloniki distribution network operation of the Energy Markets of Electricity and (Government Gazette Β' 3490/31.10.2016). Natural Gas, for Research, Production and transmission 12. The RAE's Decision No 347/2016 on the Approval networks of Hydrocarbons and other arrangements” of the Tariff for the Charge of the Main Natural Gas (Government Gazette A’179/22.08.2011), as amended Distribution Activity on Thessaly distribution network and in force (hereinafter referred to as “the Law”), and (Government Gazette Β'3537/03.11.2016). especially articles 13 and 80C thereof. -
Nikos Skoulikidis.Pdf
The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry 59 Series Editors: Damià Barceló · Andrey G. Kostianoy Nikos Skoulikidis Elias Dimitriou Ioannis Karaouzas Editors The Rivers of Greece Evolution, Current Status and Perspectives The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry Founded by Otto Hutzinger Editors-in-Chief: Damia Barcelo´ • Andrey G. Kostianoy Volume 59 Advisory Board: Jacob de Boer, Philippe Garrigues, Ji-Dong Gu, Kevin C. Jones, Thomas P. Knepper, Alice Newton, Donald L. Sparks More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/698 The Rivers of Greece Evolution, Current Status and Perspectives Volume Editors: Nikos Skoulikidis Á Elias Dimitriou Á Ioannis Karaouzas With contributions by F. Botsou Á N. Chrysoula Á E. Dimitriou Á A.N. Economou Á D. Hela Á N. Kamidis Á I. Karaouzas Á A. Koltsakidou Á I. Konstantinou Á P. Koundouri Á D. Lambropoulou Á L. Maria Á I.D. Mariolakos Á A. Mentzafou Á A. Papadopoulos Á D. Reppas Á M. Scoullos Á V. Skianis Á N. Skoulikidis Á M. Styllas Á G. Sylaios Á C. Theodoropoulos Á L. Vardakas Á S. Zogaris Editors Nikos Skoulikidis Elias Dimitriou Institute of Marine Biological Institute of Marine Biological Resources and Inland Waters Resources and Inland Waters Hellenic Centre for Marine Research Hellenic Centre for Marine Research Anavissos, Greece Anavissos, Greece Ioannis Karaouzas Institute of Marine Biological Resources and Inland Waters Hellenic Centre for Marine Research Anavissos, Greece ISSN 1867-979X ISSN 1616-864X (electronic) The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry ISBN 978-3-662-55367-1 ISBN 978-3-662-55369-5 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55369-5 Library of Congress Control Number: 2017954950 © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2018 This work is subject to copyright. -
Prot N 1716 CNS 2015 Rapid Alert
MINISTERO DELLA SALUTE Via Giano della Bella, 27 00162 Roma Istituto Superiore di Sanità Tel: 06 4990 4953 / 4954 Fax: 06 4990 4975 Centro Nazionale Sangue E-mail: [email protected] Figura 1: In nero le Prefetture dove sono state implementate misure di sicurezza trasfusionale. Pagina 1 di 1 Introduced locally acquired malaria cases in Greece up to 28th September 2015: measures for blood safety According to information from the Hellenic Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (KEELPNO) a total of 46 laboratory confirmed cases of malaria were reported up to 28th September 2015. Forty two (42) cases are classified as imported; 34 cases in immigrants from malaria endemic countries and 8 cases in travelers to endemic countries. Following a period of four years of intensive control measures to manage the reintroduction of Plasmodium Vivax Malaria the absence of such cases in 2014, four (4) locally acquired (introduced) malaria cases were reported to KE.EL.P.NO this year. The first case was reported in the municipality of Farkadona, prefecture of Trikala- region of Thessaly. The case is a 56 years old male of Greek nationality. The onset of symptoms was on the 4th August. The case reported no travel to any malaria endemic country and no history of recent blood transfusion. The second case was reported in Elos, municipality of Evrotas, prefecture of Lakonia. The case is a 40 years old female of Roumanian nationality who has been in Greece and working in Elos for the last 18 months.The onset of symptoms was on the 2nd September. She has no history of travel to any malaria endemic country and she has not reported recent blood transfusion. -
Mechanized Cotton Picking in Narrow Rows Under Greek Conditions
Mechanized cotton picking in narrow rows under Greek conditions D.I. Bartzialis and S. Galanopoulou-Sendouca University of Thessaly, Department of Agriculture, Crop Production and Agricultural Envi- ronment, Volos GREECE Correspondence author [email protected] Mechanized cotton picking in narrow rows under Greek conditions ABSTRACT Experimental procedure Cotton is traditionally cultivated in rows 1 m apart. A field experiment was conducted at two loca- tions in central Greece in three years (1997 to 1999). This system was imposed by the early picker ma- The sites, representative of major cotton production ar- chines, which are adjusted to pick at such distances. eas in the country, are: a) Stefanovikio, Magnesia Many field experiments showed the superiority of (farmer’s field), and b) Palamas, Karditsa (National Ag- narrow rows, regarding yield, earliness and low ricultural Research Foundation). The experiment was a input use. The adoption of new cotton pickers, 2 x 2 x 3 factorial, arranged in a split-split plot design which may collect cotton either in 1 m or 0.75 m, with five blocks. Main plots were the two row spacings: 1 m and 0.75 m, subplots were two cultivars: Zeta2 allows the fully mechanized application of narrow and Corina, and sub-subplots were three plant popu- rows. This mechanized system first commenced lations: 10, 20 and 30 plants/m². A plot consisted of evaluation in Greece in 1997. A field experiment four rows of length of 65 m at Stefanovikio and 40 m was carried out in two different locations in at Palamas. Thessaly, Greece, for three years. -
Development Agency of Karditsa S.A
DEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF KARDITSA S.A 34 Megalou Alexandrou str. KARDITSA 43100. PO Box 33 TEL.: +30 24410 42363 - 26345, FAX. : +30 24410 71636 E-MAIL : [email protected] http://www.anka.gr DEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF KARDITSA S.A Legal status: Development Agency of Local Authorities S.A. Location: Karditsa Capital share: 771.195 € Region of Thessaly – Regional Unity of Karditsa - Municipality of Farsala (Regional Unity of Larissa) - Action Area: Municipality of Domokos (Regional Unity of Fthiotida) – Municipatily of Fourna (Regional Unity of Euritania) Percentage of shares in Shareholders: the Agency’s capital Municipality of Karditsa 26,56% Cooperative Bank of Karditsa (SYN. P.E.) 15,87% 9,94% Region of Thessaly Union of Agricultural Cooperatives of Karditsa (EASK) 8,85% Municipality of Mouzaki 8,50% Municipality of Sofades 8,49% Municipality of Palamas 7,05% Regional Union of Municipalities of Thessaly 5,06% Municipality of Lake Palstira 3,51% Municipality of Argithea 2,89% Karditsa Chamber of Commerce 1,25% Municipality of Farsala (Regional Unity of Larissa) 1,06% Municipality of Domokos (Regional Unity of Fthiotida) 0,96% ΑΝ.ΚΑ. S.A. 2 DEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF KARDITSA S.A AN. KA S.A. is a reliable and effective development mechanism at the disposal of local Authorities as well as for the residents of the Prefectures of Karditsa, Southern Larissa and Northern Fthiotida. The Company's main objective is to help develop, manage, maintain, protect and make the best use of natural resources, introduce innovation and entrepreneurship in the productive system; introduce and increase the use of renewable energy sources; support and develop new collective structures, contribute in social development and the general development of Karditsa and other areas in Greece, if requested. -
Optitrans Baseline Study Thessaly
OPTITRANS BASELINE STUDY THESSALY Version 1.0 Date: February 2019 Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 5 2 Population and Territorial Characteristics ............................................................................................. 6 2.1 Regional Unit of Larissa ................................................................................................................. 9 2.2 Regional Unit of Trikala ................................................................................................................ 10 2.3 Regional Unit of Karditsa .............................................................................................................. 11 2.4 Regional Unit of Magnesia ........................................................................................................... 12 2.5 Regional Unit of Sporades ........................................................................................................... 13 3 Mobility and Transport Infrastructure ................................................................................................... 14 3.1 Road Transport ............................................................................................................................. 14 3.2 Rail Transport ............................................................................................................................... 17 3.3 Sea Transport ..............................................................................................................................