Life-Cycle Assessment Két Márton Kft

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Life-Cycle Assessment Két Márton Kft Life-cycle assessment Két Márton Kft. Date: 16th August 2013 ABOUT CARBON SOLUTIONS GLOBAL LTD. Carbon Solutions Global Ltd. (CSG) is a full service carbon management and carbon offset services provider, with office locations in the United Kingdom, Hungary, Romania, Slovakia and China. We deliver carbon management solutions to corporate clients, public institutions, government ministries and individuals. Our services include: a) Greenhouse gas audits for SMEs and large Enterprises. b) Reductions strategies within energy and carbon management. c) Online carbon footprint calculator for SMEs, (world’s first online business calculator validated by Bureau Veritas in April 2013) d) Carbon offsetting services, (with the most transparent online offsetting procedure on the OTC market validated by Bureau Veritas in April 2013.) e) Marketing & communications for low-carbon and carbon neutral companies f) Bespoke training to implement in-house carbon management programmes g) Consultancy within the field of sustainability CSG has signed a contract of cooperation with Két Máté Ltd. In the framework of this contract, CSG has undertaken to assess and offset operational carbon footprint of a roll cage production and shipment. SURVEYING AND LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT This study presents the carbon emission of roll cage manufacture and shipping of Audi 100 S4 C4 No.: 2013001. Boundary of the emission inventory Material consumption covers all greenhouse gas emissions from the point of raw material extraction through to the point at which a finished good is manufactured and provided for sale. Commercial enterprises may therefore use these stages into their boundary to estimate the impact of goods they procure (the red/grey stages are not included). The total GHG emissions of production of Roll cage are equivalent to 94,8787 kilogram of CO2e plus the transport of it, what is equivalent to 0,3 ton of CO2e. So the final value is 0,395 ton of CO2e. Area Emission Value Roll cage 0.095 tone CO2e Transport 0.3 tone CO2e Total 0,395 tone CO2e Rounded 1 tone CO2e Results of roll cage Material of roll cage Calculated kg CO2 Literature Slovak import steel tube 45x2,5 6,856 Worldsteel LCA Methodology Report Slovak import steel tube 40x2 42,85 Worldsteel LCA Methodology Report Steel tube transportation 0,2752 LCA Center, Greenhouse Gas Protocol Hungarian plate Thk 3 0,919 Worldsteel LCA Methodology Report Hungarian plate Thk 1,5 0,4595 Worldsteel LCA Methodology Report Welding wire d 0,8 2,571 Worldsteel LCA Methodology Report Energy consumption 40,948 Greenhouse Gas Protocol TOTAL 94,8787 Material Material Material type GWP Unit Calculated kg name quantity CO2 Roll cage Slovak import 8000 g Steel tube 0,857 kg CO2/ kg 6,856 steel tube 45x2,5 Slovak import 50 000 g Steel tube 0,857 kg CO2/ kg 42,85 steel tube 40x2 Steel tube 2,419435 MJ Energy HUN 0,11374 kg CO2/ MJ 0,2752 transportation Hungarian 1 000 g Steel plate 0,919 kg CO2/ kg 0,919 plate Thk 3 Hungarian 500 g Steel plate 0,919 kg CO2/ kg 0,4595 plate Thk 1,5 Welding wire d 3 000 g Steel 0,857 kg CO2/ kg 2,571 0,8 Energy 100 kW Energy HUN 0,40948 kg CO2/ kWh 40,948 consumption TOTAL 94,8787 train transportation Roll Cage unit 260 km MJ Energy consumption / kg cargo 0,041714 kg Steel 58 MJ Energy 2,419435 3 Transport of the car The roll cage and the other components of race car are about 500 kilogram. These are transported circa 4000 kilometers away by truck. It means that direct and indirect greenhouse gas emissions of the transportation is 0,3 ton of CO2e. REFERENCES 2012 Greenhouse Gas Conversion factors for Company Reporting (Department for Environment Food & Agriculture, UK) 2012 Greenhouse Gas Protocol 2007 Tóthné Sz. K., István Zs., Siposné M. T. (2007) – Sarokcsiszoló gyártásának,környezeti hatásvizs-gálata életcikus-elemzés módszeréve (LCA Center) 2011 Worldsteel Association– Life Cycle Assessment Methodology Report 4 .
Recommended publications
  • Raport Anual De Activitate Al INCD PAPM-ICPA 2016.Pdf
    MINISTERUL CERCETĂRII ŞI INOVĂRII INSTITUTUL NAŢIONAL DE CERCETARE-DEZVOLTARE PENTRU PEDOLOGIE AGROCHIMIE ŞI PROTECŢIA MEDIULUI – ICPA Bucureşti Bd. Mărăşti nr. 61, cod postal 011464, sect. 1, Bucureşti, ROMÂNIA Cont: RO72RZBR0000060000671307 – Raiffeisen BANK Agenţia Dorobanţi, Cont: RO30TREZ7015069XXX006353 – Trezoreria Sector 1 Bucureşti Cod fiscal nr.: RO 18107639 ; Reg. Comerţului: J40/18719/2005; Tel.: +40 - 021.318.43.49; Fax: +40 - 021.318.43.48 Web: http://www.icpa.ro; E-mail: [email protected] RAPORT ANUAL DE ACTIVITATE PENTRU ANUL 2016 AL INSTITUTULUI NAȚIONAL DE CERCETARE-DEZVOLTARE PENTRU PEDOLOGIE, AGROCHIMIE ȘI PROTECȚIA MEDIULUI ICPA-BUCUREȘTI DIRECTOR GENERAL, Cătălin SIMOTA DIRECTOR STIINTIFIC, Mihail DUMITRU DIRECTOR ECONOMIC, Ecaterina TÂRHOACĂ RAPORT ANUAL DE ACTIVITATE AL INSTITUTULUI NAȚIONAL DE CERCETARE-DEZVOLTARE PENTRU PEDOLOGIE, AGROCHIMIE ȘI PROTECȚIA MEDIULUI – ICPA BUCUREȘTI 1. Datele de identificare ale INCD 1.1. Denumirea: Institutul Naţional de Cercetare-Dezvoltare pentru Pedologie, Agrochimie şi Protecţia Mediului – ICPA București 1.2. Actul de înfiinţare, cu modificările ulterioare: HOTĂRÂRE Nr. 1375 din 26 august 2004 privind înfiinţarea, organizarea şi funcţionarea Institutului Naţional de Cercetare-Dezvoltare pentru Pedologie, Agrochimie şi Protecţia Mediului - ICPA București EMITENT: GUVERNUL ROMÂNIEI PUBLICATĂ ÎN: MONITORUL OFICIAL Nr. 830 din 9 septembrie 2004 1.3. Numărul de înregistrare în Registrul potenţialilor contractori: 3423 1.4. Adresa: Bulevardul Mărăşti, nr. 61, 011464, București – sector 1 1.5. Telefon: 0213184349, fax: 0213184348, pagina web: http://www.icpa.ro e-mail: [email protected] 2. Scurtă prezentare a INCD 2.1 Istoric Institutul de Cercetări pentru Pedologie şi Agrochimie a fost înfiinţat prin HCM 1780/02.09.1969 (Art. 9) prin reorganizarea Sectorului de Pedologie al Institutului de Cercetări pentru Îmbunătăţiri Funciare şi Pedologie, sub denumirea de Institutul de Cercetări pentru Pedologie.
    [Show full text]
  • Hidrológiai Közlöny TÖRTÉNELMI PILLANATKÉP a Magyar Hidrológiai Társaság Lapja Fejér László: Beszédes József Mottója
    1 Tartalomjegyzék Hidrológiai Közlöny TÖRTÉNELMI PILLANATKÉP A Magyar Hidrológiai Társaság lapja Fejér László: Beszédes József mottója ........................................ 3 Megjelenik háromhavonként Főszerkesztő: SZAKCIKKEK Fehér János Somlyódy László: Vízminőségi modellek és csapdák ................ 4 Szakszerkesztők: Fiala Károly, Barta Károly, Benyhe Balázs, Fehérváry István, Ács Éva Lábdy Jenő, Sipos György, Győrffy Lajos: Operatív Konecsny Károly aszály- és vízhiánykezelő monitoring rendszer .................... 14 Nagy László Szigyártó Zoltán: Az árvízveszély a Tisza mentén .................... 25 Szerkesztőbizottság elnöke: Mentes Gyula: A dunaszekcsői magaspart mozgásait előidéző Szöllősi-Nagy András okok vizsgálata ....................................................................... 34 Szerkesztőbizottság tagjai: Mikita Viktória, Szűcs Péter, P. van der Keur, K. Hinsby, M. Ács Éva, Baranyai Gábor, Bezdán Mária, Petitta, I. Fernandez, C. M. Garcia Alibrand, M. Garcia Bíró Péter, Bíró Tibor, Bogárdi János, Padilla, Csekő Adrienn: A hidrogeológiai kutatások Csörnyei Géza, Engi Zsuzsanna, Fehér Já- helyzete Európában a KINDRA projekt eredményei nos, Fejér László, Fekete Balázs, Gampel alapján .................................................................................. 46 Tamás, Gayer József, Hajnal Géza, Ijjas Bagyinszki György: Monitoring adatsorok értékelése – István, Istvánovics Vera, Józsa János, lehetőségek és módszerek az adatgyűjtéstől az Kling Zoltán, Konecsny Károly, Kovács előrejelzésig .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Here It Operates
    Asociația ZeroCO2 Str. Economu Cezărescu, nr. 1-9, etaj 1, ap. 5, Sector 6, București [email protected] SIVECO ROMANIA Annual Carbon Footprint Report 2016 According to the GHG Protocol Asociația ZeroCO2 Str. Economu Cezărescu, nr. 1-9, etaj 1, ap. 5, Sector 6, București [email protected] CONTENTS 1. Summary .............................................................................................................................. 4 1.1. Key sustainability highlights .................................................................................................... 4 1.2. Vision ....................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Goal and scope of the assessment ........................................................................................ 6 2.1. Introduction and goal definition ............................................................................................... 6 2.1.1. Commissioner of the study .............................................................................................. 6 2.1.2. Reasons to carry out the study ......................................................................................... 6 2.1.3. Target audience ................................................................................................................ 7 2.2. Scope ........................................................................................................................................ 7 2.2.1. System
    [Show full text]
  • Raport SIVECO Amprenta Car
    Asociația ZeroCO2 Str. Economu Cezărescu, nr. 1-9, etaj 1, ap. 5, Sector 6, București [email protected] SIVECO ROMANIA Raport amprenta de carbon 2016 Conform GHG Protocol Asociația ZeroCO2 Str. Economu Cezărescu, nr. 1-9, etaj 1, ap. 5, Sector 6, București [email protected] CUPRINS 1. Rezumat ............................................................................................................................... 4 1.1. Principalele aspecte de sustenabilitate ..................................................................................... 4 1.2. Viziunea ................................................................................................................................... 5 2. OBIECTIVUL ȘI SCOPUL ANALIZEI ............................................................................. 6 2.1. Introducere și definirea obiectivelor ........................................................................................ 6 2.1.1. Compania analizată .......................................................................................................... 6 2.1.2. Argumente pentru efectuarea studiului ............................................................................ 6 2.1.3. Grupul țintă ...................................................................................................................... 7 2.2. Scopul ...................................................................................................................................... 7 2.2.1. Delimitarea sistemului în funcție de operațiuni
    [Show full text]