Raport SIVECO Amprenta Car
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Raport Anual De Activitate Al INCD PAPM-ICPA 2016.Pdf
MINISTERUL CERCETĂRII ŞI INOVĂRII INSTITUTUL NAŢIONAL DE CERCETARE-DEZVOLTARE PENTRU PEDOLOGIE AGROCHIMIE ŞI PROTECŢIA MEDIULUI – ICPA Bucureşti Bd. Mărăşti nr. 61, cod postal 011464, sect. 1, Bucureşti, ROMÂNIA Cont: RO72RZBR0000060000671307 – Raiffeisen BANK Agenţia Dorobanţi, Cont: RO30TREZ7015069XXX006353 – Trezoreria Sector 1 Bucureşti Cod fiscal nr.: RO 18107639 ; Reg. Comerţului: J40/18719/2005; Tel.: +40 - 021.318.43.49; Fax: +40 - 021.318.43.48 Web: http://www.icpa.ro; E-mail: [email protected] RAPORT ANUAL DE ACTIVITATE PENTRU ANUL 2016 AL INSTITUTULUI NAȚIONAL DE CERCETARE-DEZVOLTARE PENTRU PEDOLOGIE, AGROCHIMIE ȘI PROTECȚIA MEDIULUI ICPA-BUCUREȘTI DIRECTOR GENERAL, Cătălin SIMOTA DIRECTOR STIINTIFIC, Mihail DUMITRU DIRECTOR ECONOMIC, Ecaterina TÂRHOACĂ RAPORT ANUAL DE ACTIVITATE AL INSTITUTULUI NAȚIONAL DE CERCETARE-DEZVOLTARE PENTRU PEDOLOGIE, AGROCHIMIE ȘI PROTECȚIA MEDIULUI – ICPA BUCUREȘTI 1. Datele de identificare ale INCD 1.1. Denumirea: Institutul Naţional de Cercetare-Dezvoltare pentru Pedologie, Agrochimie şi Protecţia Mediului – ICPA București 1.2. Actul de înfiinţare, cu modificările ulterioare: HOTĂRÂRE Nr. 1375 din 26 august 2004 privind înfiinţarea, organizarea şi funcţionarea Institutului Naţional de Cercetare-Dezvoltare pentru Pedologie, Agrochimie şi Protecţia Mediului - ICPA București EMITENT: GUVERNUL ROMÂNIEI PUBLICATĂ ÎN: MONITORUL OFICIAL Nr. 830 din 9 septembrie 2004 1.3. Numărul de înregistrare în Registrul potenţialilor contractori: 3423 1.4. Adresa: Bulevardul Mărăşti, nr. 61, 011464, București – sector 1 1.5. Telefon: 0213184349, fax: 0213184348, pagina web: http://www.icpa.ro e-mail: [email protected] 2. Scurtă prezentare a INCD 2.1 Istoric Institutul de Cercetări pentru Pedologie şi Agrochimie a fost înfiinţat prin HCM 1780/02.09.1969 (Art. 9) prin reorganizarea Sectorului de Pedologie al Institutului de Cercetări pentru Îmbunătăţiri Funciare şi Pedologie, sub denumirea de Institutul de Cercetări pentru Pedologie. -
Life-Cycle Assessment Két Márton Kft
Life-cycle assessment Két Márton Kft. Date: 16th August 2013 ABOUT CARBON SOLUTIONS GLOBAL LTD. Carbon Solutions Global Ltd. (CSG) is a full service carbon management and carbon offset services provider, with office locations in the United Kingdom, Hungary, Romania, Slovakia and China. We deliver carbon management solutions to corporate clients, public institutions, government ministries and individuals. Our services include: a) Greenhouse gas audits for SMEs and large Enterprises. b) Reductions strategies within energy and carbon management. c) Online carbon footprint calculator for SMEs, (world’s first online business calculator validated by Bureau Veritas in April 2013) d) Carbon offsetting services, (with the most transparent online offsetting procedure on the OTC market validated by Bureau Veritas in April 2013.) e) Marketing & communications for low-carbon and carbon neutral companies f) Bespoke training to implement in-house carbon management programmes g) Consultancy within the field of sustainability CSG has signed a contract of cooperation with Két Máté Ltd. In the framework of this contract, CSG has undertaken to assess and offset operational carbon footprint of a roll cage production and shipment. SURVEYING AND LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT This study presents the carbon emission of roll cage manufacture and shipping of Audi 100 S4 C4 No.: 2013001. Boundary of the emission inventory Material consumption covers all greenhouse gas emissions from the point of raw material extraction through to the point at which a finished good is manufactured and provided for sale. Commercial enterprises may therefore use these stages into their boundary to estimate the impact of goods they procure (the red/grey stages are not included). -
Hidrológiai Közlöny TÖRTÉNELMI PILLANATKÉP a Magyar Hidrológiai Társaság Lapja Fejér László: Beszédes József Mottója
1 Tartalomjegyzék Hidrológiai Közlöny TÖRTÉNELMI PILLANATKÉP A Magyar Hidrológiai Társaság lapja Fejér László: Beszédes József mottója ........................................ 3 Megjelenik háromhavonként Főszerkesztő: SZAKCIKKEK Fehér János Somlyódy László: Vízminőségi modellek és csapdák ................ 4 Szakszerkesztők: Fiala Károly, Barta Károly, Benyhe Balázs, Fehérváry István, Ács Éva Lábdy Jenő, Sipos György, Győrffy Lajos: Operatív Konecsny Károly aszály- és vízhiánykezelő monitoring rendszer .................... 14 Nagy László Szigyártó Zoltán: Az árvízveszély a Tisza mentén .................... 25 Szerkesztőbizottság elnöke: Mentes Gyula: A dunaszekcsői magaspart mozgásait előidéző Szöllősi-Nagy András okok vizsgálata ....................................................................... 34 Szerkesztőbizottság tagjai: Mikita Viktória, Szűcs Péter, P. van der Keur, K. Hinsby, M. Ács Éva, Baranyai Gábor, Bezdán Mária, Petitta, I. Fernandez, C. M. Garcia Alibrand, M. Garcia Bíró Péter, Bíró Tibor, Bogárdi János, Padilla, Csekő Adrienn: A hidrogeológiai kutatások Csörnyei Géza, Engi Zsuzsanna, Fehér Já- helyzete Európában a KINDRA projekt eredményei nos, Fejér László, Fekete Balázs, Gampel alapján .................................................................................. 46 Tamás, Gayer József, Hajnal Géza, Ijjas Bagyinszki György: Monitoring adatsorok értékelése – István, Istvánovics Vera, Józsa János, lehetőségek és módszerek az adatgyűjtéstől az Kling Zoltán, Konecsny Károly, Kovács előrejelzésig ......................................................................... -
Here It Operates
Asociația ZeroCO2 Str. Economu Cezărescu, nr. 1-9, etaj 1, ap. 5, Sector 6, București [email protected] SIVECO ROMANIA Annual Carbon Footprint Report 2016 According to the GHG Protocol Asociația ZeroCO2 Str. Economu Cezărescu, nr. 1-9, etaj 1, ap. 5, Sector 6, București [email protected] CONTENTS 1. Summary .............................................................................................................................. 4 1.1. Key sustainability highlights .................................................................................................... 4 1.2. Vision ....................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Goal and scope of the assessment ........................................................................................ 6 2.1. Introduction and goal definition ............................................................................................... 6 2.1.1. Commissioner of the study .............................................................................................. 6 2.1.2. Reasons to carry out the study ......................................................................................... 6 2.1.3. Target audience ................................................................................................................ 7 2.2. Scope ........................................................................................................................................ 7 2.2.1. System