DOCSLIB.ORG

Sheet1 Page 1 Name Client License History Message Transport Jeromq

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sheet1 Page 1 Name Client License History Message Transport Jeromq Sheet1 Name client License History Message Transport Java implementation of zeromq JeroMQ Java GNU LGPL library MSMQ C++, Visual Basic, .NET, Part of OS Windows since 1997 Currently only beta, version 0.6. Nanomsg 23 languages Apache License 2.0 released ul 2015 C# implementation of zeromq, NetMQ C# GNU LGPL version 3.3.2.1. released sep 2015 Ruby, Go, Java, CoffeeScript, Python, Resque Clojure MIT license stable release 2013 Python, Cyclone, Ruby, RestMQ Erlang BSD license stable release may 2015 GNU LGPL v3, or commercial license stable release 2015, community Sidekiq Ruby, HTTP for business growing IMatix, 2008, first version; 2011 mass produced, latest release aug ZeroMQ 30+ languages LGPL 2015 Message Broker Apache ActiveMQ 20+ languages Apache License 2.0 latest release 2015 Apache Apollo Java, Scala Apache License 2.0 latest release 2015 Apache Kafka 17+ languages Apache License 2.0 Version 0.9, nov 2015 C++, Perl, Python, Ruby, .NET, C, Java, JavaScript, Apache Qpid PHP Apache License 2.0 Version 0.3, sep 2014 Darner C, C++ Apache License 2.0 Stable release mar 2013 EagleMQ C BSD stable release 2013 ejabberd Erlang GNU GPL v.2 Latest commit dec 2015 FFMQ Java GNU LGPL v3 Latest release 2013 RedHat, 2009, current version HornetQ Java Apache License 2.0 2013 Page 1 Sheet1 IBM Websphere C, Visual Basic, .NET, C++, Various IBM IBM, 1990's, latest MQ V8 released in MQ Java, JMS, ActiveX licences 2014 OW2, 1999, latest release may JORAM Java, XML, 13+ others LGPL 2015 Kestrel ASP.NET, Java Apache License 2.0 2.4.1 released nov 2012 MemcacheQ Perl, Python, C, BSD license ~2009, version 0.2.0. Since 2009, stable releast sep Mosquitto C, C++, Python, javascript BSD license 2015 GlassFish, 2008, stable release OpenMQ Java, C CDDL or GPL v2 2014 LShift and CohesiveFT in 2007, Java, Ruby, Python, .NET, acquired in 2010 by SpringSource, PHP, Perl, C/C++, Node.js, division of VMware. The project Go, Erlang, Haskell, Ocaml, Mozilla Public became part of GoPivotal in May RabbitMQ Lisp, COBOL, JavaScript, License 2013. Latest release July 2015 Redis ~38 languages BSD license Stable release sep 2015 Stable release v3.2.6, 2015. Documentation only available in RocketMQ Java Apache License 2.0 Chinese. Created 2008 in Twitter.Latest Starling memcache, Ruby MIT license commit 2011 .NET, Java, C, Perl, PHP, SwiftMQ evaluation 1990, Germany. IIT Software SwiftMQ Python, Ruby license 2.0 GmbH Integration Framework Java, XML, Groovy, Scala, Kotlin. Domain-specific Version 2.16.0., oct 2015. Used by Apache Camel language Apache License 2.0 Jboss, FuseSource, talend CPAL license – UI tools, domain-specific community or Mule ESB languages Enterprise Version 3.7.0., 2015, MuleSoft Java, XML, Scala, Groovy. Spring Integration Domain-specific languages, Version 4.2.2., 2015, Pivotal Framework GUI Apache License 2.0 Software, Inc. Enterprise Service Bus Apache domain-specific languages, ServiceMix Spring, XML Apache License 2.0 Version 6.1.0., 2015 Java, JavaScript, Ruby, Apache Synapse Groovy, Scala Apache License 2.0 Version 2.1.0., 2012 Page 2 Sheet1 Fuse ESB Java Apache License 2.0 Stable release version 6, dec 2015 IBM Integration 1990, Germany. IIT Software Bus GUI IBM proprietary GmbH Java, JBoss developer Jboss community project, latest Switchyard studio Apache License 2.0 release 2015 TIBCO C, C++, Java,Visual BASIC, Created by Talarian, bought by Rendezvous Perl, .NET TIBCO proprietary TIBCO. Version 8.4.4., 2015 WSO2 ESB Java, GUI Apache License 2.0 Version 4.9.0., sep 2015 Integration suite Oracle Fusion Middleware Java, GUI proprietary Current version 12.2.3 Red Hat End User Red Hat JBoss License BPM Suite Java, GUI Aggreement Current version 6.2, part of Jboss Founded 1996, absorbed by Software AG Software AG Software AG. Now part of webMethods Java, C, C++ proprietary Software AG bundle Talend Data Apache License 2.0, Uses Kafka. Talend corporation‘s Fabric GUI or proprietary main product. other Beanstalkd 20+ languages MIT license Latest release aug 2014 Celery Depends on Api BSD license Stable release sep 2015 Gearman 10+ languages BSD Stable release dec 2014 NSQ 20+ languages MIT license Version 0.3., sep 2015 First release 1998, University of Colorado project. Backed by US GNU GPL v.3 or Air Force dept. Of Science. Latest SIENA Java, C++ higher release may 2015 Cloud based Java, Ruby, Python, .NET, Amazon SQS PHP, JavaScript Apache License 2.0 Amazon, 2004 Ruby, PHP, Python, Java, Go, .NET, Node.js and Founded 2011, iron.io. Products: IronMQ more Iron.io proprietary IronWorker, IronMQ Page 3 Sheet1 Microsoft Azure .NET, Node.js, Java, Ruby, Microsoft Service Bus Python, PHP proprietary Microsoft, 2010 Apache Software Hermes Swing GUI License Latest update 2013 Company founded in 1993, Cloud Informatica Ultra Informatica support programme started in Mesaging C, .NET, Java proprietary 2006 OpenAMQ Python, Java, Ruby, C Latest release 2010 Mozilla Public StormMQ unknown License 2009, Cloud servicing Crossroads I/O - - - IBM WebsSphere service scheduled to be ESB IBM proprietary discontinued by 2018 Jboss ESB GUI LGPL v2.1 Lastest release 2013 Kestrel Scala Apache License 2.0 Stable release nov 2012 Last update 2013. Site up but Mantaray mq C++, Java, C# MPL license download not working. NETS 12 languages Apcera corporation, Around 2000, page last updated OpenJMS Java Open Source 2007, only beta Sparrow memcache, Ruby MIT license Copyright from 2008 SmartMQ Java Open Source Last update 2013 Page 4 Sheet1 Pricing OS Native API Language Notes free Windows, UNIX zmq API Java zeromq client Part of OS Part of message queue, Windows Windows C++ or COM Windows part of Windows socket library, improvement on free Windows, UNIX nanomsg C API C ZeroMQ zeromq free Windows,UNIX zmq API C# reimplementation Redis-based Ruby free UNIX Ruby library Ruby library message queue, free UNIX REST Ruby redis-based free or $750/year Redis-based Ruby (pro) UNIX Ruby library Ruby library for Rails socket library, free Windows, UNIX zmq API C++ flexible Free Windows, UNIX JMS, CMS, NMS Java message broker message broker, improvement on Free Windows, UNIX JMS Scala ActiveMQ log aggregation solution, can be used as message Free Windows, UNIX Kafka API Scala broker Java, C++, message broker, full Free Windows, UNIX JMS, Proton Python AMQP free OSX, UNIX C++ library C++ Message broker free Linux C library C Message broker Mac OS X, free Windows, Linux Erlang library Erlang Message broker message broker, JMS-based, free Windows, UNIX JMS Java lightweight JMS API, Hornet free Works on JMS API Java message broker Page 5 Sheet1 Free for developers, otherwise $ UNIX, Linux, IBM MQI, JMS 30 - 112 Windows API Java Message broker free Windows, UNIX JMS API Java Message broker Scala Kestrel free Windows, UNIX API Scala Message broker depends on memcache free UNIX Memcache API used message broker Windows, free UNIX, Linux C library C message broker Windows, free UNIX, Solaris JMS API Java message broker Windows, Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora, RHEL, UNIX, Solaris, APIs for various free Mac OS X languages Erlang message broker data structure store – database, cache, free UNIX, Linux Redis API C message broker UNIX, Linux, free Windows JMS API Java message broker free UNIX, Windows Ruby library Ruby message broker Various Windows, products UNIX, Linux JMS Java message broker Enterprise Camel routes via Integration free Windows, UNIX Fuse IDE GUI Java Framework Enterprise free, paid Integration support Windows, UNIX Mule Studio Java Framework Enterprise Integration free Windows, UNIX Spring Java Framework Enterprise Service Bus, unifies ActiveMQ, Camel, free Windows, UNIX OSGi Java CXF, Karaf Enterprise Service free Windows, UNIX REST API Java Bus Page 6 Sheet1 Windows, Enterprise Service free UNIX, Linux OSGi, JBI Java Bus developer Configuration Enterprise Service edition free Windows, UNIX Manager Proxy Java Bus Enterprise Service free Windows, UNIX Switchyard API Java Bus free trial, after that, Windows, VMS, Enterprise Service paid UNIX, MVS TIBCO API Java Bus Enterprise Service free Windows, UNIX WSO2 API Java Bus Windows, free for UNIX, Linux, developers OSX JMS API Java Integration suite free for developers Windows, UNIX Jboss API Java Integration suite commercial product Windows, UNIX JMS API Java Integration suite free for developers, Windows, paid UNIX, OSX, otherwise Linux talend API Java Integration suite UNIX, Linux, free Mac Beanstalk API C task queue Celery Calling free UNIX API Python task queue free linux Gearman API C task queue Web UI nsqadmin, NSQ Distributed free OSX, UNIX API Go messaging platform Event Notification free UNIX, Linux Siena API Java Architecture message queueing Usage-based service, AWS payment Cloud-based Amazon API unknown account necessary Free or $30 (developer) – 500 (dedicated cluster) Iron API, message queueing /month Cloud-based dashboard Go service Page 7 Sheet1 Usage-based Cloud-based Enterprise Service payment server .NET .NET Bus free JMS GUI - Java GUI for JMS Part of the Informatica Data integration Windows, JMS-based cloud bundle Linux, UNIX JMS API Java queueing services Windows, Linux, AIX, Solaris, Mac OS/X, UNIX JMS API Free for up to 5 connected StormMQ API, message queueing clients Cloud-based SQL compatible Java service - - - - Site down Enterprise Service Windows, UNIX JMS API unknown Bus Windows, Ulinux, Unix, Enterprise Service free OS X Java Bus free UNIX JVM Scala message queue Windows, serverless transport free Linux, Solaris JMS API Java layer (P2P) depends on client language Ruby free Windows, UNIX OpenJMS API Java JMS implementation free UNIX JMS API Ruby message broker unknown, probably anything with free Java JMS j2se Java Page 8 Sheet1 Website Active/Inactive SSL support Clustering https://github.com/zeromq/jero mq Active NO YES https://msdn.microsoft.com/en - us/library/ms711472(v=vs.85).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Evaluating DDS, MQTT, and Zeromq Under Different Iot Traffic Conditions
    Evaluating DDS, MQTT, and ZeroMQ Under Different IoT Traffic Conditions Zhuangwei Kang Robert Canady Abhishek Dubey Vanderbilt University Vanderbilt University Vanderbilt University Nashville, Tennessee Nashville, Tennessee Nashville, Tennessee [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Aniruddha Gokhale Shashank Shekhar Matous Sedlacek Vanderbilt University Siemens Technology Siemens Technology Nashville, Tennessee Princeton, New Jersey Munich, Germany [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Abstract Keywords: Publish/Subscribe Middleware, Benchmark- ing, MQTT, DDS, ZeroMQ, Performance Evaluation Publish/Subscribe (pub/sub) semantics are critical for IoT applications due to their loosely coupled nature. Although OMG DDS, MQTT, and ZeroMQ are mature pub/sub solutions used for IoT, prior studies show that their performance varies significantly under different 1 Introduction load conditions and QoS configurations, which makes Distributed deployment of real-time applications and middleware selection and configuration decisions hard. high-speed dissemination of massive data have been hall- Moreover, the load conditions and role of QoS settings in marks of the Internet of Things (IoT) platforms. IoT prior comparison studies are not comprehensive and well- applications typically adopt publish/subscribe (pub/- documented. To address these limitations, we (1) propose sub) middleware for asynchronous and cross-platform a set of performance-related properties for pub/sub mid- communication. OMG Data Distribution Service (DDS), dleware and investigate their support in DDS, MQTT, ZeroMQ, and MQTT are three representative pub/sub and ZeroMQ; (2) perform systematic experiments under technologies that have entirely different architectures (de- three representative, lab-based real-world IoT use cases; centralized data-centric, decentralized message-centric, and (3) improve DDS performance by applying three and centralized message-centric, respectively).
    [Show full text]
  • This Paper Must Be Cited As
    Document downloaded from: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/64607 This paper must be cited as: Luzuriaga Quichimbo, JE.; Pérez, M.; Boronat, P.; Cano Escribá, JC.; Tavares De Araujo Cesariny Calafate, CM.; Manzoni, P. (2015). A comparative evaluation of AMQP and MQTT protocols over unstable and mobile networks. 12th IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC 2015). IEEE. doi:10.1109/CCNC.2015.7158101. The final publication is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CCNC.2015.7158101 Copyright IEEE Additional Information © 2015 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works. A comparative evaluation of AMQP and MQTT protocols over unstable and mobile networks Jorge E. Luzuriaga∗, Miguel Perezy, Pablo Boronaty, Juan Carlos Cano∗, Carlos Calafate∗, Pietro Manzoni∗ ∗Department of Computer Engineering Universitat Politecnica` de Valencia,` Valencia, SPAIN [email protected], jucano,calafate,[email protected] yUniversitat Jaume I, Castello´ de la Plana, SPAIN [email protected], [email protected] Abstract—Message oriented middleware (MOM) refers to business application [6]. It works like instant messaging or the software infrastructure supporting sending and receiving email, and the difference towards these available
    [Show full text]
  • Enterprise Integration Patterns N About Apache Camel N Essential Patterns Enterprise Integration Patterns N Conclusions and More
    Brought to you by... #47 CONTENTS INCLUDE: n About Enterprise Integration Patterns n About Apache Camel n Essential Patterns Enterprise Integration Patterns n Conclusions and more... with Apache Camel Visit refcardz.com By Claus Ibsen ABOUT ENTERPRISE INTEGRATION PaTTERNS Problem A single event often triggers a sequence of processing steps Solution Use Pipes and Filters to divide a larger processing steps (filters) that are connected by channels (pipes) Integration is a hard problem. To help deal with the complexity Camel Camel supports Pipes and Filters using the pipeline node. of integration problems the Enterprise Integration Patterns Java DSL from(“jms:queue:order:in”).pipeline(“direct:transformOrd (EIP) have become the standard way to describe, document er”, “direct:validateOrder”, “jms:queue:order:process”); and implement complex integration problems. Hohpe & Where jms represents the JMS component used for consuming JMS messages Woolf’s book the Enterprise Integration Patterns has become on the JMS broker. Direct is used for combining endpoints in a synchronous fashion, allow you to divide routes into sub routes and/or reuse common routes. the bible in the integration space – essential reading for any Tip: Pipeline is the default mode of operation when you specify multiple integration professional. outputs, so it can be omitted and replaced with the more common node: from(“jms:queue:order:in”).to(“direct:transformOrder”, “direct:validateOrder”, “jms:queue:order:process”); Apache Camel is an open source project for implementing TIP: You can also separate each step as individual to nodes: the EIP easily in a few lines of Java code or Spring XML from(“jms:queue:order:in”) configuration.
    [Show full text]
  • Robust Messaging with Rabbitmq
    Spring RabbitMQ for High Load Martin Toshev Who am I Software consultant (CoffeeCupConsulting) BG JUG board member (http://jug.bg) OpenJDK and Oracle RDBMS enthusiast Twitter: @martin_fmi 2 3 Agenda • Messaging Basics • RabbitMQ Overview • Spring RabbitMQ 4 Messaging Basics 5 Messaging • Messaging provides a mechanism for loosely-coupled integration of systems • The central unit of processing in a message is a message which typically contains a body and a header 6 Use cases • Offloading long-running tasks to worker nodes • Distributing and processing high loads of data • Aggregating logs and propagating events between systems • Many others … 7 Messaging protocols • Messaging solutions implement different protocols for transferring of messages such as AMQP, XMPP, MQTT, STOMP, Kafka binary protocol and others • The variety of protocols imply vendor lock-in 8 Messaging protocols comparison AMQP MQTT XMPP STOMP Kafka goal replacement of messaging for instant messaging, message-oriented processing of large proprietary protocols resource-constrained adopted for wider middleware real-time data feeds devices use format binary binary XML-based text-based binary API divided into classes simple (5 basic different XML items ~ 10 basic commands 42 request types in (> 40 methods in operations with 2-3 with multiple types latest version (Kafka RabbitMQ) packet types for each) 2.0.0) reliability publisher/subscriber acknowledgements Acknowledgments Subscriber Acknowledgements, acknowledgements, and resumptions acknowledgements transactional transactions
    [Show full text]
  • Rocketbufs: a Framework for Building Efficient, In-Memory, Message-Oriented Middleware
    RocketBufs: A Framework for Building Efficient, In-Memory, Message-Oriented Middleware Huy Hoang, Benjamin Cassell, Tim Brecht, Samer Al-Kiswany Cheriton School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo ABSTRACT ACM Reference Format: As companies increasingly deploy message-oriented middleware Huy Hoang, Benjamin Cassell, Tim Brecht, Samer Al-Kiswany. 2020. Rock- (MOM) systems in mission-critical components of their infrastruc- etBufs: A Framework for Building Efficient, In-Memory, Message-Oriented Middleware. In The 14th ACM International Conference on Distributed and tures and services, the demand for improved performance and func- Event-based Systems (DEBS ’20), July 13–17, 2020, Virtual Event, QC, Canada. tionality has accelerated the rate at which new systems are being ACM, New York, NY, USA, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3401025.3401744 developed. Unfortunately, existing MOM systems are not designed to take advantages of techniques for high-performance data center communication (e.g., RDMA). In this paper, we describe the design 1 INTRODUCTION and implementation of RocketBufs, a framework which provides Message-Oriented Middleware (MOM) systems, also often referred infrastructure for building high-performance, in-memory Message- to as publish/subscribe, message-queuing, or event-based systems, Oriented Middleware (MOM) applications. RocketBufs provides are a popular class of software designed to support loosely-coupled memory-based buffer abstractions and APIs, which are designed messaging in modern distributed applications. Examples of appli- to work efficiently with different transport protocols. Applications cations and services that utilize MOM systems include IBM’s cloud implemented using RocketBufs manage buffer data using input functions [29], the Apache OpenWhisk serverless framework [10], (rIn) and output (rOut) classes, while the framework is responsible the Hyperledger blockchain framework [7] and streaming media for transmitting, receiving and synchronizing buffer access.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Notification Methods with Respect to Mobile System Characteristics
    Proceedings of the Federated Conference on DOI: 10.15439/2015F6 Computer Science and Information Systems pp. 1183–1189 ACSIS, Vol. 5 Analysis of notification methods with respect to mobile system characteristics Piotr Nawrocki ∗, Mikołaj Jakubowski † and Tomasz Godzik ‡ ∗AGH University of Science and Technology, al. A. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland e-mail:[email protected] †e-mail:[email protected] ‡e-mail:[email protected] Abstract—Recently, there has been an increasing need for most promise and therefore the purpose is to discern their secure, efficient and simple notification methods for mobile usefulness in the best way possible. systems. Such systems are meant to provide users with precise In addition to the protocols and methods above, we inves- tools best suited for work or leisure environments and a lot of effort has been put into creating a multitude of mobile tigated other solutions, such as the Apple push notification applications. However, not much research has been put at the or Line application which, for various reasons, were not same time into determining which of the available protocols considered further. The Apple push notification technology is a are best suited for individual tasks. Here a number of basic good solution, but it is proprietary, i.e. limited to Apple devices notification methods are presented and tests are performed for and that is why we decided to test more universal solutions the most promising ones. An attempt is made to determine which methods have the best throughput, latency, security and other first. There are also solutions (applications) that use their own characteristics.
    [Show full text]
  • Unravel Data Systems Version 4.5
    UNRAVEL DATA SYSTEMS VERSION 4.5 Component name Component version name License names jQuery 1.8.2 MIT License Apache Tomcat 5.5.23 Apache License 2.0 Tachyon Project POM 0.8.2 Apache License 2.0 Apache Directory LDAP API Model 1.0.0-M20 Apache License 2.0 apache/incubator-heron 0.16.5.1 Apache License 2.0 Maven Plugin API 3.0.4 Apache License 2.0 ApacheDS Authentication Interceptor 2.0.0-M15 Apache License 2.0 Apache Directory LDAP API Extras ACI 1.0.0-M20 Apache License 2.0 Apache HttpComponents Core 4.3.3 Apache License 2.0 Spark Project Tags 2.0.0-preview Apache License 2.0 Curator Testing 3.3.0 Apache License 2.0 Apache HttpComponents Core 4.4.5 Apache License 2.0 Apache Commons Daemon 1.0.15 Apache License 2.0 classworlds 2.4 Apache License 2.0 abego TreeLayout Core 1.0.1 BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License jackson-core 2.8.6 Apache License 2.0 Lucene Join 6.6.1 Apache License 2.0 Apache Commons CLI 1.3-cloudera-pre-r1439998 Apache License 2.0 hive-apache 0.5 Apache License 2.0 scala-parser-combinators 1.0.4 BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License com.springsource.javax.xml.bind 2.1.7 Common Development and Distribution License 1.0 SnakeYAML 1.15 Apache License 2.0 JUnit 4.12 Common Public License 1.0 ApacheDS Protocol Kerberos 2.0.0-M12 Apache License 2.0 Apache Groovy 2.4.6 Apache License 2.0 JGraphT - Core 1.2.0 (GNU Lesser General Public License v2.1 or later AND Eclipse Public License 1.0) chill-java 0.5.0 Apache License 2.0 Apache Commons Logging 1.2 Apache License 2.0 OpenCensus 0.12.3 Apache License 2.0 ApacheDS Protocol
    [Show full text]
  • Talend Open Studio for Big Data Release Notes
    Talend Open Studio for Big Data Release Notes 6.0.0 Talend Open Studio for Big Data Adapted for v6.0.0. Supersedes previous releases. Publication date July 2, 2015 Copyleft This documentation is provided under the terms of the Creative Commons Public License (CCPL). For more information about what you can and cannot do with this documentation in accordance with the CCPL, please read: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/ Notices Talend is a trademark of Talend, Inc. All brands, product names, company names, trademarks and service marks are the properties of their respective owners. License Agreement The software described in this documentation is licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may not use this software except in compliance with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html. Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the specific language governing permissions and limitations under the License. This product includes software developed at AOP Alliance (Java/J2EE AOP standards), ASM, Amazon, AntlR, Apache ActiveMQ, Apache Ant, Apache Avro, Apache Axiom, Apache Axis, Apache Axis 2, Apache Batik, Apache CXF, Apache Cassandra, Apache Chemistry, Apache Common Http Client, Apache Common Http Core, Apache Commons, Apache Commons Bcel, Apache Commons JxPath, Apache
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Architecture for Java Universal Message Passing (AA-JUMP)
    The International Arab Journal of Information Technology, Vol. 15, No. 3, May 2018 429 Advanced Architecture for Java Universal Message Passing (AA-JUMP) Adeel-ur-Rehman1 and Naveed Riaz2 1National Centre for Physics, Pakistan 2School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, National University of Science and Technology, Pakistan Abstract: The Architecture for Java Universal Message Passing (A-JUMP) is a Java based message passing framework. A- JUMP offers flexibility for programmers in order to write parallel applications making use of multiple programming languages. There is also a provision to use various network protocols for message communication. The results for standard benchmarks like ping-pong latency, Embarrassingly Parallel (EP) code execution, Java Grande Forum (JGF) Crypt etc. gave us the conclusion that for the cases where the data size is smaller than 256K bytes, the numbers are comparative with some of its predecessor models like Message Passing Interface CHameleon version 2 (MPICH2), Message Passing interface for Java (MPJ) Express etc. But, in case, the packet size exceeds 256K bytes, the performance of the A-JUMP model seems to be severely hampered. Hence, taking that peculiar behaviour into account, this paper talks about a strategy devised to cope up with the performance limitation observed under the base A-JUMP implementation, giving birth to an Advanced A-JUMP (AA- JUMP) methodology while keeping the basic workflow of the original model intact. AA-JUMP addresses to improve performance of A-JUMP by preserving its various traits like portability, simplicity, scalability etc. which are the key features offered by flourishing High Performance Computing (HPC) oriented frameworks of now-a-days.
    [Show full text]
  • Dcamp: Distributed Common Api for Measuring
    DCAMP: DISTRIBUTED COMMON API FOR MEASURING PERFORMANCE A Thesis presented to the Faculty of California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in Computer Science by Alexander Paul Sideropoulos December 2014 c 2014 Alexander Paul Sideropoulos ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP TITLE: dCAMP: Distributed Common API for Measuring Performance AUTHOR: Alexander Paul Sideropoulos DATE SUBMITTED: December 2014 COMMITTEE CHAIR: Michael Haungs, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Computer Science COMMITTEE MEMBER: Aaron Keen, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Computer Science COMMITTEE MEMBER: John Bellardo, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Computer Science iii ABSTRACT dCAMP: Distributed Common API for Measuring Performance Alexander Paul Sideropoulos Although the nearing end of Moore's Law has been predicted numerous times in the past [22], it will eventually come to pass. In forethought of this, many modern computing systems have become increasingly complex, distributed, and parallel. As software is developed on and for these complex systems, a common API is necessary for gathering vital performance related metrics while remaining transparent to the user, both in terms of system impact and ease of use. Several distributed performance monitoring and testing systems have been proposed and implemented by both research and commercial institutions. How- ever, most of these systems do not meet several fundamental criterion for a truly useful distributed performance monitoring system: 1) variable data delivery mod- els, 2) security, 3) scalability, 4) transparency, 5) completeness, 6) validity, and 7) portability [30]. This work presents dCAMP: Distributed Common API for Measuring Per- formance, a distributed performance framework built on top of Mark Gabel and Michael Haungs' work with CAMP.
    [Show full text]
  • Talend ESB System Management Integration User Guide
    Talend ESB System Management Integration User Guide 6.0.1 Publication date: September 10, 2015 Copyright © 2011-2015 Talend Inc. All rights reserved. Copyleft This documentation is provided under the terms of the Creative Commons Public License (CCPL). For more information about what you can and cannot do with this documentation in accordance with the CCPL, please read: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/ This document may include documentation produced at The Apache Software Foundation which is licensed under The Apache License 2.0. Notices Talend and Talend ESB are trademarks of Talend, Inc. Apache CXF, CXF, Apache Karaf, Karaf, Apache Camel, Camel, Apache Maven, Maven, Apache Archiva, Archiva, Apache Syncope, Syncope, Apache ActiveMQ, ActiveMQ, Apache Log4j, Log4j, Apache Felix, Felix, Apache ServiceMix, ServiceMix, Apache Ant, Ant, Apache Derby, Derby, Apache Tomcat, Tomcat, Apache ZooKeeper, ZooKeeper, Apache Jackrabbit, Jackrabbit, Apache Santuario, Santuario, Apache DS, DS, Apache Avro, Avro, Apache Abdera, Abdera, Apache Chemistry, Chemistry, Apache CouchDB, CouchDB, Apache Kafka, Kafka, Apache Lucene, Lucene, Apache MINA, MINA, Apache Velocity, Velocity, Apache FOP, FOP, Apache HBase, HBase, Apache Hadoop, Hadoop, Apache Shiro, Shiro, Apache Axiom, Axiom, Apache Neethi, Neethi, Apache WSS4J, WSS4J are trademarks of The Apache Foundation. Eclipse Equinox is a trademark of the Eclipse Foundation, Inc. SoapUI is a trademark of SmartBear Software. Hyperic is a trademark of VMware, Inc. Nagios is a trademark of Nagios Enterprises, LLC. All other brands, product names, company names, trademarks and service marks are the properties of their respective owners. Table of Contents 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................. 1 2. Hyperic HQ Integration .............................................................................................. 3 2.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Notification Methods in Wireless Systems
    Computer Science 17 (4) 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.7494/csci.2016.17.4.519 • Piotr Nawrocki Mikołaj Jakubowski Tomasz Godzik NOTIFICATION METHODS IN WIRELESS SYSTEMS Abstract Recently, there has been an increasing need for secure, efficient, and simple notification methods for wireless systems. Such systems are meant to provide users with precise tools best suited for work or leisure environments, and a lot of effort has been put into creating a multitude of applications. At the same time, however, not much research has been made into determining which of the available protocols are best suited for each individual task. A number of basic notification methods are presented here, and tests have been performed for the most-promising ones. An attempt has been made to determine which of the methods have the best throughput, latency, security, and other characteristics. A comprehensive comparison is provided, which can be used to select the right method for each individual project. Finally, conclusions are provided, and the results from all of the tests conducted are discussed. Keywords notification methods, wireless systems, energy consumption Citation Computer Science 17 (4) 2016: 519–539 519 28 listopada 2016 str. 1/21 520 Piotr Nawrocki, Mikołaj Jakubowski, Tomasz Godzik 1. Introduction The purpose of this paper is to analyze and test several selected notification methods for wireless platforms. This paper is an expanded version of a paper [6] presented at the Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, Lodz, Poland, 2015. The reason for this research is the need to determine the best way of sending simple as well as more-advanced messages about the events involved in the operation of grid systems or telemetric networks.
    [Show full text]