Il Settarismo Come Strumento Di Securitizzazione Della Mobilitazione Politica in Bahrein

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Il Settarismo Come Strumento Di Securitizzazione Della Mobilitazione Politica in Bahrein Corso di Laurea magistrale in Relazioni Internazionali Comparate Tesi di Laurea Il settarismo come strumento di securitizzazione della mobilitazione politica in Bahrein Relatrice Ch.ma. Prof.ssa Maria Cristina Paciello Correlatrice Ch.ma. Prof.ssa Barbara De Poli Laureando Leonardo Jacopo Maria Mazzucco 872034 Anno Accademico 2018 / 2019 INDICE INDICE...................................................................................................................................................... 2 ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................................ 4 INTRODUZIONE ....................................................................................................................................... 9 1. IL SETTARISMO NELL’ISLAM: UN CONCETTO CONTESO .............................................................. 13 1.1 La fitna e l’origine dello sciismo ........................................................................................... 13 1.2 Ta’ifah o Ta’ifiyyah? Le problematicità della definizione e le criticità della traduzione linguistica .......................................................................................................................................... 21 1.3 L’approccio identitario per lo studio del settarismo ........................................................... 30 2. L’EVOLUZIONE DEL SETTARISMO IN MEDIO ORIENTE E NORD AFRICA ...................................... 39 2.1 L’evoluzione del settarismo durante l’Impero Ottomano .................................................... 40 2.2 La Nuova Guerra Fredda ....................................................................................................... 42 2.3 Le Rivolte Arabe .................................................................................................................... 47 2.4 Il settarismo come strategia politica .................................................................................... 49 2.5 Come esaminare il settarismo in Bahrein ............................................................................ 54 3. L’ASCESA E LE RAMIFICAZIONI DEL SETTARISMO IN BAHREIN TRA UN NUOVO RENTIER-STATE, UN RINNOVATO AVVENTURISMO POLITICO E L’IMPATTO DELLE RIFORME NEOLIBERALI ............... 64 3.1 I mutamenti nel contesto regionale ..................................................................................... 65 3.2 L’organizzazione e la costruzione dello spazio in Bahrein................................................... 73 3.2.1 La politica di costruzione del suolo ................................................................................ 73 3.2.2 La memoria dei luoghi tra passato, presente e futuro ................................................ 77 3.2.3 La politica urbanistica ................................................................................................... 80 3.2.4 L’ingegneria residenziale: gli insediamenti di Isa Town e Hamad Town .................... 83 3.3 Il tessuto sociale: tra lavoro e migrazioni ............................................................................ 85 3.4 Gli apparati di sicurezza: tra pratiche di naturalizzazione e le trasformazioni demografiche 91 3.5 Welfare, opportunità e servizi ............................................................................................. 95 4. LO SCIISMO POLITICO E LA STORICITÀ DELL’OPPOSIZIONE IN BAHREIN: TRA COOPTAZIONE E REPRESSIONE ...................................................................................................................................... 100 4.1 Lo sciismo politico ............................................................................................................... 101 4.2 L’evoluzione storica della mobilitazione politica in Bahrein: dal protettorato britannico alla vigilia delle rivolte arabe del 2011 .......................................................................................... 104 4.2.1 La storicità delle rivendicazioni .................................................................................. 106 4.2.3 Gli sciiti tra cooptazione e minaccia: dalla Rivoluzione Iraniana all’Intifada ........... 114 4.3 Da emirato a monarchia: tra riforme ed autoritarismo .................................................... 119 2 5. LA “PRIMAVERA ARABA” IN BAHREIN: LA SECURITIZZAZIONE DELLA MOBILITAZIONE POLITICA 125 5.1 Cause ed evoluzioni della “Primavera Araba” in Bahrein ................................................. 126 5.2 Il fronte delle rivendicazioni: .............................................................................................. 129 5.2.1 Le prime rivendicazioni: la dialettica tra manifestanti e movimenti politici storici ........ 130 5.2.2 Pearl Roundabout: tra innovazione e tradizione .............................................................. 134 5.3 La risposta del regime e l’escalation della tensione: tra repressione, stallo e radicalizzazione ............................................................................................................................... 137 5.3.1 L’altra “Roundabout”: la moschea Al Fateh ..................................................................... 139 5.3.2 L’imporsi della narrazione settaria: la mediatizzazione del conflitto, gli scioperi sindacali e la rottura nel fronte dell’opposizione ..................................................................................... 141 5.3.4 L’intervento del Peninsula Shield Forces e l’importanza del Bahrein nello scacchiere saudita ......................................................................................................................................... 145 5.4 La controrivoluzione e la de-democratizzazione ..................................................................... 147 5.4.1 La securitizzazione delle proteste: dalle rivendicazioni politiche alla minaccia iraniana 148 5.4.2 L’eradicazione dell’opposizione politica ........................................................................... 154 5.4.3 L’eradicazione dell’opposizione dagli spazi fisici .............................................................. 157 5.4.4 Dialogo nazionale e la Bahrain Independent Commission of Inquiry .............................. 158 5.4.5 I “backfired effects” dell’uso strategico del settarismo ................................................... 162 CONCLUSIONI ...................................................................................................................................... 168 BIBLIOGRAFIA: .................................................................................................................................... 173 3 ABSTRACT The Arab Uprisings occurred in 2011 not only have they represented a political turmoil for the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), but they have also unleashed an unprecedented wave of sectarian violence along the region whose effects have reverberated until nowadays. Even if the resurgence of the sectarian divide is traceable to the crackdown of the Iraqi regime in 2003, caused by the US-led occupation which redrawn the equilibrium of the geopolitical balance of power of the region, it is with the 2011’s unrests that sectarianism became the main focal point though which the Arab uprisings would have been framed. This study aims to prove that, in Bahrain, during the Arab Uprisings in 2011, the main reason behind the failure of the reform’s process was the securitisation of the popular political mobilisation through a framework based on sectarian identities. While having old historical roots, the sectarian conflict has been nurtured in the recent time by a regime-driven strategy designed to frame the political opposition to the Al Khalifa Monarchy as a security threat which needs to be addressed through the violent repression perpetrated by the security- regime apparatus. In order to evaluate the possible impact of a sectarian strategy on the Bahraini political mobilisation, the first part of this work is aimed at analysing both the origins of sectarianism in the Islamic religion by explaining the intrinsic significance of the division (fitna) between Sunni and Shi’a and the sectarian phenomenon as a contested concept in the academic literature on sectarian studies. Besides, this study develops a path that traces the main transformations of sectarianism in the MENA region, moving from the decline of the Ottoman Empire in the late 1800’s to the closer Arab Uprisings in 2011. Furthermore, the research will focus on the case study of Bahrain by examining how the sectarian phenomenon can be turned by the regime into a political instrument able to reinforce the economic and social discrimination as well as the residential segregation of the Shi’a community. Before concentrating on the 2011’s upheavals, the analysis will move backwards by investigating the political mobilisation in Bahrain through a historical framework in order to highlight the fact that a regime opposition built on cross- sectarian and cross-ideological instances is a recurring feature in the Bahraini context. For this work, centred on the securitisation of the popular uprisings, the study will compare the instances promoted by the agendas of the different political movements which gathered in 4 Pearl Roundabout, the protests’ core in Manama, to validate the research hypothesis of the protests as a movement demanding political reforms and moved by cross-sectarian and cross- ideological roots. As far as the
Recommended publications
  • Kingdom of Bahrain Submission to the UN Universal Periodic Review
    Kingdom of Bahrain Submission to the UN Universal Periodic Review 27th Session of the UPR Working Group Submitted 22 September 2016 Submission by Bahrain Human Rights Observatory (BHRO): Creation of parties and non-governmental organizations Freedom of assembly and peaceful demonstration Excessive suppression of protests Freedom of opinion and expression BHRO : Bahrain Human Rights Observatory Mrs. Jalila Al-Salman Mobile: +97336595325 e-mail: [email protected] Background: This report, addressed to the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) session on Bahrain, covers the period from the end of the UPR in May 2012 up to the writing of this report in April 2016. The report is based on the Bahraini Constitution and the laws acted upon domestically. It is also founded on the United Nation’s Charter, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as well as major conventions and treaties that Bahrain had endorsed in this field. The figures and statistics in this report depend on our observations of the violations committed. Bahrain’s enforcement of the 2012 Human Rights Council’s Recommendations: The United Nation’s Human Rights Council issued, in its second cycle in May 2012, 21 recommendations regarding the freedom of opinion, expression, peaceful assembly and association. Albeit Bahrain had roughly agreed upon all the recommendations mentioned, nothing had actually changed except an enhancement in the level of suppression against protesters. The Humans Rights Council had advised to make space for a political opposition. However, the Bahraini authorities did not comply with these recommendations, and more so pressured political associations to dissolve The Islamic Action Society [also known as Amal Party] in 2012 and chased down al-Wefaq National Islamic Society and the National Democratic Action Society (Waad) until al-Wefaq was dissolved in June 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • The Transnational Indian Community in Manama, Bahrain
    City of Strangers: The Transnational Indian Community in Manama, Bahrain Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Gardner, Andrew M. Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 02/10/2021 14:12:59 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/195849 CITY OF STRANGERS: THE TRANSNATIONAL INDIAN COMMUNITY IN MANAMA, BAHRAIN By Andrew Michael Gardner ____________________________ Copyright © Andrew Michael Gardner 2005 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF ANTHROPOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2 0 0 5 2 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Dissertation Committee, we certify that we have read the dissertation prepared by Andrew M. Gardner entitled City of Strangers: The Transnational Indian Community in Manama, Bahrain and recommended that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy __________________________________________________ Date: ______________ Linda Green __________________________________________________ Date: ______________ Tim Finan __________________________________________________ Date: ______________ Mark Nichter __________________________________________________ Date: ______________ Michael Bonine Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candidate’s submission of the final copies of the dissertation to the Graduate College. I hereby certify that I have read this dissertation prepared under my direction and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement.
    [Show full text]
  • A Divided Sea: a Study of Bahrain's Identity Conflict and Identity Formation
    Master’s Thesis 2018 30 ECTS Department of International Environment And Development Studies Prof. Stig Jarle Hansen A Divided Sea: A Study of Bahrain’s Identity Conflict and Identity Formation Bashar Marhoon International Relations LANDSAM The Department of International Environment and Development Studies, Noragric, is the international gateway for the Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU). Established in 1986, Noragric’s contribution to international development lies in the interface between research, education (Bachelor, Master and PhD programmes) and assignments. The Noragric Master theses are the final theses submitted by students in order to fulfil the requirements under the Master programme “International Environment Studies”, “International Development Studies” and “International Relations”. The findings of this thesis do not necessarily reflect the views of Noragric. Extracts from this publication may only be reproduced after prior consultation with the author and on condition that the source is indicated. For rights of reproduction or translation, contact Noragric. © Bashar Marhoon, May 2018 [email protected] Noragric Department of International Environment and Development Studies P.O. Box 5003 N-1432 Ås Norway Tel.: +47 67 23 00 00 Internet: https://www.nmbu.no/fakultet/landsam/institutt/noragric I Declaration I, Bashar Marhoon, declare that this thesis is a result of my research investigations and findings. Sources of information other than my own have been acknowledged and a reference list has been appended. This work has not been previously submitted to any other university for award of any type of academic degree. Signature……………………………………………. Date…………………………………………. II III Acknowledgements This research would not have been possible without the existence of many individuals in my life, some of whom I must briefly thank.
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns of Torture in Bahrain: Perpetrators Must Face Justice
    Patterns of Torture in Bahrain: Perpetrators must Face Justice A Report by the Gulf Centre for Human Rights (GCHR) March 2021 Patterns of Torture in Bahrain: Perpetrators must Face Justice I. Executive Summary 3 II. Methodology 4 III. Introduction 5 1. Patterns of Torture 6 1.1 The Prevalence of Torture in the Bahraini Justice System and Extraction of Confessions by Torture 6 1.2 Gross Violations of Fair Trial Rights and Due Process: The Admissibility of Confessions Extracted by Torture in Criminal Proceedings 10 1.3 The Use of Torture and its Chilling Effect on Exercising the Rights to Freedom of Expression, Assembly and Association 11 1.4 Torture and Travel Bans in Reprisal against Human Rights Defenders who Interact with International Human Rights Mechanisms 12 2. Ending the Culture of Impunity: Ensuring that Perpetrators of Torture are Held Accountable 14 2.1 Tackling the Culture of Impunity within Bahrain 14 2.2 Ensuring International Accountability by Moving Away from a Culture of Complicity in the International Community 15 3. Conclusion 20 4. Recommendations 21 4.1 Recommendations to the Government of Bahrain 21 4.2 Recommendations to the International Community 21 2 Patterns of Torture in Bahrain: Perpetrators must Face Justice I. Executive Summary This report provides a comprehensive overview of the specific ways and means by which torture is perpetrated in Bahrain, with a particular focus on the period since the 2011 popular movement and the violent crackdown that followed. The report documents the widespread use of forms of
    [Show full text]
  • In Colonial Bahrain: Beyond the Sunni / Shia Divide
    THREATS TO BRITISH “PROTECTIONISM” IN COLONIAL BAHRAIN: BEYOND THE SUNNI / SHIA DIVIDE A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Arab Studies By Sarah E. A. Kaiksow, M.St. Washington, D.C. April 24, 2009 I would like to thank Dr. Judith Tucker and Dr. Sara Scalenghe for inspiration and encouragement. ii Copyright 2009 by Sarah E. A. Kaiksow All Rights Reserved iii TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction 1 Research Focus 2 Periodization 7 Archives 9 II. Background 12 The al-Khalifa and the British 12 Economy & Society of an island thoroughfare 17 Trade, pearls, date gardens, fish, and fresh water springs 17 Baharna, Huwala, Persians, Najdis, Thattia Bhattias, and Jews 20 III. Threats on the Ground: Saud-Wahabis in the Nineteenth Century 24 Uncertain allies (1830-1831) 24 First interventions (1850-1850) 26 Saud-Wahabis, Persia, and the Ottomans (1860-1862) 29 Distinctive registers 33 A new role for Britain (circa 1920) 34 The case for internal “reform” (1920-1923) 36 The “Najdi” crisis (April, 1923) 44 Debating the threats (May, 1923) 48 Forced succession (May 26, 1923) 50 Pearling industry and reforms (1915-1923) 52 Resistance to colonial reform (June – September, 1923) 55 Dawasir Exodus (October, 1923) 59 Consolidating the state (1926-1930) 61 IV. Persia and State Consolidation in the Twentieth Century 64 V. Conclusion 66 Bibliography 75 iv I. Introduction In the early months of 1923, the Under Secretary
    [Show full text]
  • Bahrain 2016 Human Rights Report
    BAHRAIN 2016 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Bahrain is a constitutional monarchy. King Hamad Bin Isa al-Khalifa, the head of state, appoints the cabinet, consisting of 26 ministers; 12 of those ministers were members of the al-Khalifa ruling family. Parliament consists of an appointed upper house, the Shura (Consultative) Council, and the elected Council of Representatives, each with 40 seats. Approximately 52 percent of eligible voters participated in parliamentary elections held in 2014. Turnout was significantly lower in opposition districts, due in part to a decision to boycott the elections by the main opposition political societies and a lack of confidence among opposition communities in the electoral system. The government did not permit international election monitors. Domestic monitors generally concluded the authorities administered the elections without significant procedural irregularities. There were, however, broader concerns regarding voting-district boundaries. Civilian authorities maintained effective control over the security forces. The most serious human rights problems included limitations on citizens’ ability to choose their government peacefully, including due to the government’s ability to close arbitrarily or create registration difficulties for organized political societies; restrictions on free expression, assembly, and association; and lack of due process in the legal system, including arrests without warrants or charges and lengthy pretrial detentions--used especially in cases against opposition members
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary and Municipal Elections in Bahrain 2006: Islamic Sunnis Are Leading the Second Elections in Bahrain
    Parliamentary and municipal elections in Bahrain 2006: Islamic Sunnis are leading the second elections in Bahrain 13 December 2006 The first round The results of the Bahraini parliamentary and municipal elections were a frustration to more than 25 former Bahraini deputies who re-nominated themselves. Only six of them won. The elections were frustrating also to the women. Out of 16 women candidates, only one woman won by acclaim while the other women lost. None of these women were qualified for the rerun. Meanwhile, the Islamic national Accord [Wifaq] Society won 15 seats out of a total of 26 seats. This was confirmed by the final results of the first round elections. The total number of candidates who ran for parliamentary elections reached 207 candidates who nominated themselves in 39 electoral constituencies while 13 candidates announced their withdrawal from the electoral battle. The candidates competed for 40 House of Representatives seats. Meanwhile, 171 candidates competed in the municipal elections for 40 seats in five municipal councils in Bahrain’s five governorates. Surprises as violent as a thunderbolt were reported during the elections. Most former parliamentary figures lost the election. The most important of these were the first deputy speaker of the House of Representatives Abdul Hadi Marhoon, who won 300 votes only compared to his competitor who obtained 4,000 votes. The results of the elections also showed the loss of the chairmen of the financial and foreign committees. No second Bahraini woman won. The only woman winner was Latifah al-Qu’ud who won by acclaim. Moreover, Sulaiman Abbawi, the first Christian to run for municipal elections, lost.
    [Show full text]
  • Bahrain: Unrest, Security, and U.S
    Bahrain: Unrest, Security, and U.S. Policy Kenneth Katzman Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs Updated February 24, 2020 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov 95-1013 Bahrain: Unrest, Security, and U.S. Policy Summary A 2011 uprising by a mostly Shia opposition to the Sunni-minority-led regime of Bahrain’s Al Khalifa ruling family has subsided, but punishments of oppositionists and periodic demonstrations continue. The uprising did not achieve its goal of establishing a constitutional monarchy, but the unrest compelled the ruling family to undertake some modest reforms. Elections for the lower house of a legislative body, last held in 2018, were marred by the banning of opposition political societies and allegations of gerrymandering. The mainstream opposition uses peaceful forms of dissent, but small factions, reportedly backed by Iran, have conducted some attacks on security officials. The government’s repression presents a policy dilemma for the United States because Bahrain is a longtime ally that is pivotal to maintaining Persian Gulf security. The country has hosted a U.S. naval command headquarters for the Gulf region since 1948; the United States and Bahrain have had a formal Defense Cooperation Agreement (DCA) since 1991; and Bahrain is designated by the United States as a “major non-NATO ally.” There are nearly 5,000 U.S. forces, mostly Navy, in Bahrain, which relies on U.S.-made arms. Because of the government’s use of force against protesters, both the Obama and Trump Administrations curtailed U.S. assistance to Bahrain’s internal security organizations. The Trump Administration has prioritized countering Iran and addressing other regional security issues, and to that end has lifted the previous Administration’s conditionality on major arms sales to Bahrain’s military and has corroborated Bahrain leadership assertions that Iran is providing material support to violent opposition factions in Bahrain.
    [Show full text]
  • Methods of Repression in Bahrain During the 20Th and 21St Century: from the Civil List to Social Media
    Durham E-Theses Methods of Repression in Bahrain during the 20th and 21st Century: From the Civil List to Social Media JONES, MARC,OWEN How to cite: JONES, MARC,OWEN (2016) Methods of Repression in Bahrain during the 20th and 21st Century: From the Civil List to Social Media, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/11554/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 Methods of Repression in Bahrain during the 20th and 21st Century: From the Civil List to Social Media Marc Owen Jones A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctorate of Philosophy School of Government and International Affairs Durham University (November 2015) 1 Marc Owen Jones: Thesis Abstract Methods of Repression in Bahrain During the 20th and 21st Century: From the Civil List to Social Media Despite being afflicted by cyclical bouts of unrest over the past century, repression in Bahrain as a concept has not been the focus of considerable academic attention.
    [Show full text]
  • Bahrain Timeline 2010–2016
    Bahrain Timeline 2010–2016 COLOR KEY: ■ EVENTS IN BAHRAIN ■ HUMAN RIGHTS FIRST REPORTS ■ U.S. GOVERNMENT ACTIONS/STATEMENTS 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 —— DECEMBER 3 —— FEBRUARY 14–16: Mass protests break out in Bahrain, voicing a range of grievances including —— FEBRUARY: Bahrain: The —— FEBRUARY 10: A new round of —— JULY 7 —— JANUARY 20: —— JANUARY 12: political and socio-economic concerns. Police open fire killing two protestors. Gathering Storm “reconciliation talks” begins, Court sentences Triggered by —— FEBRUARY 17: Police clear the Pearl Roundabout. Hundreds of protestors are injured and three —— MAY 5 excluding key opposition Nabeel Rajab the global drop are killed by police using shotguns. Al Wefaq, the political society with the largest amount of figures still in prison. to 6 months in in oil price, seats in Parliament, announces it will suspend its participation in Parliament. —— AUGUST: State Department prison for online the Bahraini releases human rights report comments made government cuts Secretary Clinton —— FEBRUARY 18–MAY 30: King Hamad declares a three month state of emergency. Hundreds of State Department: “The on Bahrain, simultaneously in 2014. subsidies on after meeting peaceful dissidents, opposition leaders, and medics are arrested and many tortured. U.S. is deeply concerned noting a failure to implement —— FEBRUARY: How gasoline, raising with Bahrain by the Government of —— MARCH 14: The Gulf Co-operation Council (GCC) agrees to send troops at the request of the most of the recommendations to Bring Stability the price by Foreign Minister the Kingdom of Bahrain’s Bahraini Government. Saudi Arabian troops arrive and are joined by security forces from the Authorities arrest leading while praising the King for to Bahrain 60%.
    [Show full text]
  • Bahrain Page 1 of 7
    Bahrain Page 1 of 7 Published on Freedom House (https://freedomhouse.org) Home > Bahrain Bahrain Country: Bahrain Year: 2016 Freedom Status: Not Free Political Rights: 7 Civil Liberties: 6 Aggregate Score: 14 Freedom Rating: 6.5 Overview: After the opposition’s boycott of the 2014 parliamentary elections and unsuccessful attempts at compromise, relations between Bahrain’s government and the opposition remained tense in 2015. The opposition groups Al-Wefaq and the National Democratic Action Society, among others, faced heightened harassment during the year. In June, a Bahraini court sentenced Al-Wefaq president Ali Salman to four years in prison on a number of serious charges, including promotion of violent political change. Security forces arrested Ibrahim Sharif, former leader of the National Democratic Action Society, on similar charges in July, a month after releasing him from a prison sentence for his involvement in the 2011 uprising. Separately, authorities punished a range of critics, dissidents, and suspected extremists—including 72 people in January alone—by stripping them of citizenship. Attacks on freedom of speech and the press continued during the year. In February, the government shuttered the satellite television station Al-Arab, owned by a Saudi prince, just hours after its launch because the station aired an interview with a leading member of Al- Wefaq. In August, authorities temporarily shuttered Al-Wasat, one of Bahrain’s five Arabic daily newspapers, after it published criticism of the government. Protesters and security forces clashed on several occasions. Police abuse, including arbitrary arrests and torture in custody, continued during the year, as did bomb attacks by https://freedomhouse.org/print/47969 7/12/2016 Bahrain Page 2 of 7 civilians against police.
    [Show full text]
  • Bahrain Update: Mahdi Abu Dheeb Released, Repression Continues
    Bahrain Update: Mahdi Abu Dheeb Released, Repression Continues An earlier version of this report appeared in issue 6 (May 2016) of UCU London Retired Members' Newsletter. Changes include provision of a fuller set of references/links and some textual additions, in particular concerning recent repressive measures against Bahrain Teachers Association vice-president, Jalila al-Salman. Alongside some welcome news from Bahrain, recent developments strengthen the case for not only continuing, but further intensifying solidarity with popular struggles against the regime, above all with independent Bahraini trade unions. The good news, first, is that in April Mahdi Abu Dheeb, president of the Bahrain Teachers Association (BTA), was released from prison. Mahdi was convicted by a military court following involvement in the protests of Spring 2011. His imprisonment was an element of the regime's response to mass support for democratic reform. As such it provoked trade union opposition internationally. Mahdi's release, five years on, is widely welcomed, but not an ounce of gratitude is owed to the regime and its allies. As Chris Keates, General Secretary of British teachers' union NASUWT, has observed: “While the news that Mahdi has finally been released is wonderful, the fact remains that he has lost the last five years of his life and been subjected to repeated abuse and torture while in prison simply for doing nothing more than organising and representing the interests of teachers, and calling for quality education for all children and young people in Bahrain.” The victimisation of Mahdi is far from being an isolated phenomenon. Nor are the underlying issues in any sense resolved or even addressed by his release, any more than they were by that of BTA vice-president Jalila al-Salman in November 2012.
    [Show full text]