DOCSLIB.ORG

Town of Ipswich

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Town of Ipswich OKLAH ARKANSAS RIVER LOW WATER DAM PROJECT DOCUMENT SEARCH – FLOODPLAIN REQUIREMENTS AND ORDINANCES UPDATED JUNE 2013 Table of Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................................... 1 Section 1 - Excerpts from Previous Studies..................................................................................................... 6 Section 2 - Communities Certified Floodplain Administrators List ................................................................ 10 Tulsa County....................................................................................................................................... Sand Springs ....................................................................................................................................... Tulsa .............................................................................................................................................. Jenks .............................................................................................................................................. Bixby .............................................................................................................................................. State of Oklahoma ............................................................................................................................. Section 3 - Permit Requirements. ................................................................................................................... 11 Tulsa County....................................................................................................................................... 11 Building Permit (Floodplain Development) .......................................................................... City of Sand Springs ........................................................................................................................... 13 Floodplain Development ....................................................................................................... City of Tulsa ........................................................................................................................................ 15 Watershed Development Permit .......................................................................................... City of Jenks ....................................................................................................................................... 19 Floodplain Development ....................................................................................................... City of Bixby ....................................................................................................................................... 22 Earth Change Permit ............................................................................................................. Building Permit...................................................................................................................... State of Oklahoma ............................................................................................................................. 27 Floodplain Development ....................................................................................................... Section 4 - FEMA Floodplain and Floodway Requirements ............................................................................ 34 Title 44: Emergency Management and Assistance ............................................................................ 34 PART 65—IDENTIFICATION AND MAPPING OF SPECIAL HAZARD AREAS .......................................... 34 Section 5 - Oklahoma Water Resource Board Requirements ......................................................................... 51 Oklahoma Floodplain Management Act ............................................................................................ 51 Section 6 – Floodplain Ordinances .................................................................................................................. 61 Tulsa County....................................................................................................................................... 61 City of Sand Springs ........................................................................................................................... 72 City of Tulsa ........................................................................................................................................ 87 Title 11-A - Stormwater Management and Hazard Mitigation Program – Chapter 3. - Watershed Development Regulations .................................................................................. City of Jenks ....................................................................................................................................... 105 Jenks City Code 2011: ........................................................................................................... City of Bixby ....................................................................................................................................... 128 Chapter 10 of the Bixby City Code - STORM DRAINAGE, DETENTION AND EARTH CHANGE (Ord. 854, 9-9-2002; amd. 2006 Code) ...................................................... Chapter 2 - FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION .......................................................................... Chapter 3 - EARTH CHANGES ................................................................................................ Section 7 - Engineering Design Criteria ........................................................................................................... 157 Tulsa County....................................................................................................................................... 157 City of Sand Springs ........................................................................................................................... 160 City of Tulsa ........................................................................................................................................ 229 Stormwater Design Criteria: Chapter 300 - Stormwater Policy and Standards .................... City of Jenks ....................................................................................................................................... 247 City of Jenks Engineering Design Criteria .............................................................................. City of Bixby ....................................................................................................................................... 285 City of Bixby Engineering Design Criteria Manual ................................................................ Section 8- Title 44: Emergency Management and Assistance ........................................................................ 328 PART 65—IDENTIFICATION AND MAPPING OF SPECIAL HAZARD AREAS .......................................... § 65.1 Purpose of part. ......................................................................................................... § 65.2 Definitions. ................................................................................................................. § 65.3 Requirement to submit new technical data. ............................................................. § 65.4 Right to submit new technical data. .......................................................................... § 65.5 Revision to special hazard area boundaries with no change to base flood elevation determinations...................................................................................................... § 65.6 Revision of base flood elevation determinations. ..................................................... § 65.7 Floodway revisions. .................................................................................................... § 65.8 Review of proposed projects. .................................................................................... § 65.9 Review and response by the Administrator. .............................................................. § 65.10 Mapping of areas protected by levee systems. ....................................................... § 65.11 Evaluation of sand dunes in mapping coastal flood hazard areas. .......................... § 65.12 Revision of flood insurance rate maps to reflect base flood elevations caused by proposed encroachments. .................................................................................................... § 65.13 Mapping and map revisions for areas subject to alluvial fan flooding. ................... § 65.14 Remapping of areas for which local flood protection systems no longer provide base flood protection............................................................................................................ § 65.15 List of communities submitting new technical data. ............................................... § 65.16 Standard Flood Hazard Determination Form and Instructions. ............................... § 65.17 Review of determinations. ....................................................................................... ARKANSAS RIVER LOW WATER DAM PROJECT DOCUMENT SEARCH – FLOODPLAIN REQUIREMENTS AND ORDINANCES ORIGINALLY PREPARED DECEMBER 2009 UPDATED JUNE 2013 TO INCLUDE BIXBY, OK AND TO UPDATE ORDINANCES 1 ARKANSAS RIVER LOW
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Keystone Ancient Forest Preserve Resource Management Plan 2011
    Keystone Ancient Forest Preserve Resource Management Plan 2011 Osage County & Tulsa County, Oklahoma Lowell Caneday, Ph.D. With Kaowen (Grace) Chang, Ph.D., Debra Jordan, Re.D., Michael J. Bradley, and Diane S. Hassell This page intentionally left blank. 2 Acknowledgements The authors acknowledge the assistance of numerous individuals in the preparation of this Resource Management Plan. On behalf of the Oklahoma Tourism and Recreation Department’s Division of State Parks, staff members were extremely helpful in providing access to information and in sharing of their time. In particular, this assistance was provided by Deby Snodgrass, Kris Marek, and Doug Hawthorne – all from the Oklahoma City office of the Oklahoma Tourism and Recreation Department. However, it was particularly the assistance provided by Grant Gerondale, Director of Parks and Recreation for the City of Sand Springs, Oklahoma, that initiated the work associated with this RMP. Grant provided a number of documents, hosted an on-site tour of the Ancient Forest, and shared his passion for this property. It is the purpose of the Resource Management Plan to be a living document to assist with decisions related to the resources within the park and the management of those resources. The authors’ desire is to assist decision-makers in providing high quality outdoor recreation experiences and resources for current visitors, while protecting the experiences and the resources for future generations. Lowell Caneday, Ph.D., Professor Leisure Studies Oklahoma State University Stillwater,
    [Show full text]
  • Eep MANNFORD Beautiful
    Apollo 13 returned safelv after an Stock brokers were swamped with A total eclipse of the Sun fascinated Dynamite destroyed a hijacked air­ inboard explosion crippled the orders as averages suffered the scientists around the world. This view liner in Jordan. Arab guerillas craft enroute to the Moon. sharpest decline since 1929. of the solar corona was spectacular. held passengers hostage for days. Two men scaled the vertical face Cambodia joined allied forces in Too much oil appeared on the surface A Pakistani man is grief-stricken of 3,400-ft El Capitan. They rested strikes to rout Red troops using of the nation's already troubled waters. over the loss of his family in a in bat tents on the ascent that took bases inside its borders. It was "up with ecology" and down tidal wave that took 140,000 lives. 30 days. with pollution of natural resources. Thousands perished in earthquakes that rocked the length of Peru. Indecisiveness over the "mini" and "maxi" of Tall and green-eyed Miss Puerto Rico captivated Tom Dempsey of pro-football's New Orleans Saints it alt found American women dressed in pantsuits the judges and New York City in winning the Miss kicked a record 62-yard field goal against Detroit. as a compromise. At year's end it looked like the Universe title. "mini" would survive. Death claimed two prominent figures in world This demonstrator of the opposite sex saw a little politics, former president Charles DeGaulle of bit of good for all in the women's liberation drive. France and Egypt's president Gamal Nasser.
    [Show full text]
  • Mannford State Bank
    !.uL\' \ *• NINETEEN HUNDRED & MANNFORD H. S. 68. Would you believe that these people have work to do? Contents Opening Pg 1 Dedication 6 Administration 7 Seniors 13 Juniors 21 Sophomores 25 Junior High 29 Elementary 35 Athletics 43 Royalty 59 Organizations 65 Activities 75 Advertising 83 School = Masquerades + meetings + parties? We're dedicated to Miss Doris Stockton, Teacher of the Year. We wish to award her for her services to us, as students, and as students, our awards are limited in number. We wish to honor her with our greatest honors; our love, gratitude, and this, the Pirate Yearbook dedi­ cation of 1968. We wish her to have more than a thank you for services rendered this year. Services above and beyond the call of duty deserve thanks above and beyond the call of our expression of them. Though our expression is small, our gratitude is great. For that which is unspoken .... Miss Stockton Teacher, '68 eat \ V 1 ••i • n • • • 1 1 I 1 • • •III • • • • III I • • III 1 in i • • III II 11 B nil III 1 I • II III llll in i • I llll I B llll 1 • in • • • III • • ii • • • i i i i • • •in 1 • in • • MM • 11 • • •• • • i 1 • •I •i • i • •1 •• BB MM M 1 B MM B B ill ADMINISTRATION :>= — • . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ — • • 1 • 1 • • 1 • • •• BB IB 11 1 B BB •i • • i • • III! • • i llll I • •iii 1 • III • • • • i • • in • I II I • • 1 II 1 1I • •in 1 • III • • • • ii n • • • in III 11 • llll 1 Hill I• IIlll l I llll • llll I • i III 11 i • in • • • • • lllinl • III! • • I n I Ii • •in 1 • III • • • • 1 • • in • • 11 • • 1 1 B I• • Bill 1 II • •1 • • 1 • •1 Bill MM •i • 1 1 • I• •1 Bill B I I B B II B i • m II II • II i • III! • • II i II llll IN llll ¥1 III llll nil mini • • i in Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Southwest Tulsa Table of Contents August 3, 2003
    History of Southwest Tulsa Table of Contents August 3, 2003 CHAPTER ONE: PRE-HISTORY............................................................................................................. 10 LAYERS OF HISTORY ................................................................................................................................ 10 GEOLOGICAL NOTES ................................................................................................................................ 13 ARCHEOLOGICAL NOTES .......................................................................................................................... 14 ANTHROPOLOGICAL NOTES ...................................................................................................................... 14 SOCIOLOGICAL NOTES .............................................................................................................................. 15 POLITICAL NOTES ..................................................................................................................................... 15 CHAPTER TWO: EARLY HISTORY .................................................................................................... 16 CATTLE DRIVES AND CROSSINGS ............................................................................................................. 16 FRISCO RAILROAD ARRIVES IN RED FORK ............................................................................................... 19 ORIGINAL TOWNS SPRING UP..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Arkansas River Corridor Feasibility Report
    1 Arkansas River 2 Corridor Feasibility 3 Report 4 Arkansas River Flood Plain Zink Lake 5 6 Draft Report 7 8 Prepared by: 9 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 10 Tulsa District 11 06 February 2017 This Page Intentionally Left Blank 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 The purpose of the Arkansas River Corridor Feasibility Study is to evaluate the components of 3 the October 2005 Arkansas River Corridor (ARC) Master Plan and determine if there is a 4 Federal interest that aligns with the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) mission areas. 5 The study area includes the 42-mile long Arkansas River Corridor ecosystem downstream of the 6 Keystone Dam to the Tulsa/Wagoner County boundary (Figure ES1). Key tributary streams 7 include, but are not limited to, Prattville Creek at Sand Springs, Crow Creek in Tulsa, and 8 Vensel Creek at Jenks. The study area is confined to within the existing banks of the Arkansas 9 River. 10 The study identifies ecosystem restoration measures to restore the 42-mile riverine ecosystem 11 within the Arkansas River Corridor that has been degraded since the installation of Keystone 12 Dam and operation of the associated hydropower generation plant. The Resource of National 13 Significance for the study is the Interior Least Tern (Sterna antillarum), a Federally listed 14 endangered species that depends upon sandbar islands within the river for nesting habitat. 15 The generation of hydropower at Keystone Dam, which has been in operation since 1968, has 16 had a significant influence over the health and ultimate degradation of the ecosystem within the 17 study corridor.
    [Show full text]