New England Journal of Public Policy Volume 17 | Issue 1 Article 8 9-21-2001 Redistricting on Beacon Hill and Political Power on Capitol Hill: Ancient Legacies and Present-Day Perils Richard A. Hogarty University of Massachusetts Boston Garrison Nelson University of Vermont Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.umb.edu/nejpp Part of the Legal History, Theory and Process Commons, and the Politics Commons Recommended Citation Hogarty, Richard A. and Nelson, Garrison (2001) "Redistricting on Beacon Hill and Political Power on Capitol Hill: Ancient Legacies and Present-Day Perils," New England Journal of Public Policy: Vol. 17: Iss. 1, Article 8. Available at: http://scholarworks.umb.edu/nejpp/vol17/iss1/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks at UMass Boston. It has been accepted for inclusion in New England Journal of Public Policy by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at UMass Boston. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. Redistricting on Ancient Legacies Beacon Hill and and Present-Day Political Power Perils on Capitol Hill Richard A. Hogarty Garrison Nelson This article discusses legislative reapportionment and past efforts to manipulate district lines as far back as the legendary Elbridge Gerry in the early nineteenth century. Specifically, it deals with what political history has to tell us about the current furor over House Speaker Thomas Finneran’s proposed congressional redistricting. More than any other state in the Union, the Massachusetts law- makers in the U.S. House of Representatives have enjoyed disproportionate power as a result of a bipartisan strategy of incumbency protection dating back to the 1940s.