Java Magazin 8.2007
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The State of the Feather
The State of the Feather An Overview and Year In Review of The Apache Software Foundation The Overview • Not a replacement for “Behind the Scenes...” • To appreciate where we are - • Need to understand how we got here 2 In the beginning... • There was The Apache Group • But we needed a more formal and legal entity • Thus was born: The Apache Software Foundation (April/June 1999) • A non-profit, 501(c)3 Corporation • Governed by members - member based entity 3 “Hierarchies” Development Administrative PMC Members Committers Board Contributors Officers Patchers/Buggers Members Users 4 At the start • There were only 21 members • And 2 “projects”: httpd and Concom • All servers and services were donated 5 Today... • We have 227 members... • ~54 TLPs • ~25 Incubator podlings • Tons of committers (literally) 6 The only constant... • Has been Change (and Growth!) • Over the years, the ASF has adjusted to handle the increasing “administrative” aspects of the foundation • While remaining true to our goals and our beginnings 7 Handling growth • ASF dedicated to providing the infrastructure resources needed • Volunteers supplemented by contracted out SysAdmin • Paperwork handling supplemented by contracted out SecAssist • Accounting services as needed • Using pro-bono legal services 8 Staying true • Policy still firmly in the hands of the ASF • Use outsourced help where needed – Help volunteers, not replace them – Only for administrative efforts • Infrastructure itself is a service provided by the ASF • Board/Infra/etc exists so projects and people -
FREE DOWNLOAD COMPONENTS/THIRD PARTY TERMS and CONDITIONS PROGRAM: Sybase® Replication Server® - Data Assurance Option Version 15.6.X (All Platforms)
FREE DOWNLOAD COMPONENTS/THIRD PARTY TERMS AND CONDITIONS PROGRAM: Sybase® Replication Server® - Data Assurance Option version 15.6.x (all platforms) The Program contains open source and other free download components as identified below. Third party license terms and other third party-required notices are provided below. Apache Software Foundation Components: Derby, Commons Digester and Commons Logging The Program includes software developed by the Apache Software Foundation. The Apache components are provided subject to the Apache License v2.0. Copyright© 1999-2010 The Apache Software Foundation. All rights reserved. A copy of the Apache License v2.0 is attached as Attachment 1. The Derby includes the third party components listed in Attachment 2. Sun Microsystems Component: Java Runtime Environment 1.6 The Java Runtime Environment includes the third party components listed in Attachment 3. Flexera Software Component: InstallAnywhere No third party license terms or additional notices required. Startertool.com Component: Startertool No third party license terms or additional notices required. Sun Microsystems Component: Java Servlets No third party license terms or additional notices required. Sybase Common Security Infrastructure Components This version of the Program includes Common Security Infrastructure v3.1 which contains the following additional open source and free download components: Apache Software Foundation Components: Apache xml-sec, Commons BeanUtils, Commons Digester, Commons Validator, Commons Logging, Commons FileUpload and Struts The Program includes software developed by the Apache Software Foundation. Copyright© 1999- 2004 The Apache Software Foundation. All rights reserved. A copy of the Apache License v2.0 is at Attachment 1. OpenSAML.org Component: OpenSAML The Program includes software made available by OpenSAML.org. -
Return of Organization Exempt from Income
OMB No. 1545-0047 Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax Form 990 Under section 501(c), 527, or 4947(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code (except black lung benefit trust or private foundation) Open to Public Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service The organization may have to use a copy of this return to satisfy state reporting requirements. Inspection A For the 2011 calendar year, or tax year beginning 5/1/2011 , and ending 4/30/2012 B Check if applicable: C Name of organization The Apache Software Foundation D Employer identification number Address change Doing Business As 47-0825376 Name change Number and street (or P.O. box if mail is not delivered to street address) Room/suite E Telephone number Initial return 1901 Munsey Drive (909) 374-9776 Terminated City or town, state or country, and ZIP + 4 Amended return Forest Hill MD 21050-2747 G Gross receipts $ 554,439 Application pending F Name and address of principal officer: H(a) Is this a group return for affiliates? Yes X No Jim Jagielski 1901 Munsey Drive, Forest Hill, MD 21050-2747 H(b) Are all affiliates included? Yes No I Tax-exempt status: X 501(c)(3) 501(c) ( ) (insert no.) 4947(a)(1) or 527 If "No," attach a list. (see instructions) J Website: http://www.apache.org/ H(c) Group exemption number K Form of organization: X Corporation Trust Association Other L Year of formation: 1999 M State of legal domicile: MD Part I Summary 1 Briefly describe the organization's mission or most significant activities: to provide open source software to the public that we sponsor free of charge 2 Check this box if the organization discontinued its operations or disposed of more than 25% of its net assets. -
Oncommand Core Package Software Products
Notices About this information The following copyright statements and licenses apply to software components that are distributed with various versions of the OnCommand Core package software products. Your product does not necessarily use all the software components referred to below. Where required, source code is published at the following location: ftp://ftp.netapp.com/frm-ntap/opensource/ Copyrights and licenses The following components are subject to the Apache License 1.1: ◆ Apache Tomcat - 5.0.20 Copyright © 2004 The Apache Software Foundation. All rights reserved. ◆ Apache-HTTP Server - 1.1.1 Copyright © 2000-2002 The Apache Software Foundation. All rights reserved. ◆ Apache Jakarta BCEL 5 Copyright © 2001 The Apache Software Foundation. All rights reserved. ◆ Apache Xerces Java XML Parser 2.6.1 Copyright © 1999- 2003 The Apache Software Foundation. All rights reserved. ◆ Apache Base64 functions 1.1 Copyright © 2000- 2002 The Apache Software Foundation. All rights reserved. ◆ Apache HTTP Server 1.1.1 Copyright © 2000- 2002 The Apache Software Foundation. All rights reserved. ◆ Apache Xerces Java XML Parser 2.6.2 Copyright © 2000- 2002 The Apache Software Foundation. All rights reserved. ◆ Apache Jakarta Commons CLI - 1.0 Copyright © 2002-2010 The Apache Software Foundation. All rights reserved. ◆ Apache Jakarta Commons Collections - 2.1 Copyright © 2001-2008 The Apache Software Foundation. All rights reserved. ◆ Apache Jakarta Commons Discovery - 0.2 Copyright © 2002-2011 The Apache Software Foundation . ◆ Apache Jakarta Commons FileUpload - 1.0 Copyright © 2002-2010 The Apache Software Foundation . All rights reserved. ◆ Apache log4j - 1.2.8 Notices 1 215-05829_A0—Copyright © 2011 NetApp, Inc. All rights reserved. Copyright 2007 The Apache Software Foundation. -
7.1 Oracle Bpel Process Manager
Institute of Architecture of Application Systems University of Stuttgart Universitätsstraße 38 D–70569 Stuttgart Diplomarbeit Nr. 2728 Fault Handling Across the Web Services Stack Pablo Fuentetaja Abad Course of Study: Computer Science Examiner: Prof. Dr. Frank Leymann Supervisor: Dipl.-Inf. Oliver Kopp Commenced: January ,14 2008 Completed: July, 15 2008 CR-Classification: C.2.0, C.2.1, C.2.2, C.2.4, D.2.11 Acknowledgments To my family and friends. Their support has helped me during the difficult moments. Without them this would have not been possible. To Prof. Dr. F. Leymann. For offer me the opportunity of developing this work in the Institut für Architektur von Anwendungssystemen. To Dipl.-Inf. O. Kopp. For his work, help, and supervision during these months. To Dipl.-Inf. Matthias Wieland. For his last supervision and comments. Abstract The Business Process Execution Language (BPEL) is an XML based language for describing business process behaviour based on Web services. The BPEL notation includes flow control, variables, concurrent execution, input and output, transaction scoping/compensation, and error handling. These processes are executed on a BPEL engine which calls and receives messages from external parties. The BPEL process is suspended or terminated if such communication fails, not providing any detailed information about the cause. The aim of this diploma thesis is the description of the different communication faults that can be found throughout the Web Services Stack, how they are reflected and describe a general concept of fault handling. Two BPEL engines are use on this thesis “Oracle BPEL Process Manager” and “Apache ODE”. -
Performance Evaluation of Enterprise Service Buses Towards Support of Service Orchestration Themba Shezi, Edgar Jembere , and Mathew Adigun the Internet
International Conference on Computer Engineering and Network Security (ICCENS'2012) December 26-27, 2012 Dubai (UAE) Performance Evaluation of Enterprise Service Buses towards Support of Service Orchestration Themba Shezi, Edgar Jembere, and Mathew Adigun the Internet. In most scenarios services are combined in a Abstract- The use of Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) as the process to achieve a business objective. For defining these cornerstone for system integrations has shown improvement in many processes Web Service Business Process Execution Language aspect of business information systems, including paving a way for (WS-BPEL) is used. Service Oriented computing, reusability, business to business collaboration and standard based communication infrastructure. ESB SOA implementations that were based on only endpoints as a concept defines set of capabilities which includes message fall short of the key infrastructure to support data routing, transformation, and service orchestration. However there transformation, event handling, and durable messaging. These exist different approaches towards achieving these capabilities. There additional requirements to SOA led to what is known as is much ongoing research on architectural issues and enabling Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) [3]. technologies for ESBs, but the body of knowledge regarding service ESB is a standard based integration infrastructure that automation and orchestration schemes needs some improvements. In this work we provide comparative performance evaluation of enables heterogeneous services and applications to interact by ServiceMix, Mule and JBoss ESB regarding service orchestration. combining web service technology, messaging, intelligent The results showed that the use of Apache ODE as the orchestration routing, data transformation and service orchestration [2]. The engine gave ServiceMix an advantage over the other ESBs. -
SL150 Licensing Information User Manual
1[StorageTek] SL150 Modular Tape Library Licensing Information User Manual E72038-04 December 2018 StorageTek SL150 Modular Tape Library Licensing Information User Manual E72038-04 Copyright © 2016, 2018, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. This software and related documentation are provided under a license agreement containing restrictions on use and disclosure and are protected by intellectual property laws. Except as expressly permitted in your license agreement or allowed by law, you may not use, copy, reproduce, translate, broadcast, modify, license, transmit, distribute, exhibit, perform, publish, or display any part, in any form, or by any means. Reverse engineering, disassembly, or decompilation of this software, unless required by law for interoperability, is prohibited. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice and is not warranted to be error-free. If you find any errors, please report them to us in writing. If this is software or related documentation that is delivered to the U.S. Government or anyone licensing it on behalf of the U.S. Government, then the following notice is applicable: U.S. GOVERNMENT END USERS: Oracle programs, including any operating system, integrated software, any programs installed on the hardware, and/or documentation, delivered to U.S. Government end users are "commercial computer software" pursuant to the applicable Federal Acquisition Regulation and agency-specific supplemental regulations. As such, use, duplication, disclosure, modification, and adaptation of the programs, including any operating system, integrated software, any programs installed on the hardware, and/or documentation, shall be subject to license terms and license restrictions applicable to the programs. -
The Apache Forrest Xdocs Document-V1.3 DTD
The Apache Forrest xdocs document-v1.3 DTD NOTICE: The content of this document doesn't make any sense at all. This is a demonstration document using all possible elements in the current Apache Forrest xdocs document-v13.dtd Table of contents 1 Sample Content..................................................................................................................................2 1.1 Block and inline elements............................................................................................................2 1.2 Various presentation formats....................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Using sections.............................................................................................................................. 4 1.4 Sections, the sequel......................................................................................................................4 1.5 Showing preformatted source code..............................................................................................5 1.6 Using tables..................................................................................................................................5 1.7 Using figures................................................................................................................................ 6 2 DTD changes..................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Changes since document-v12.......................................................................................................6 -
Apache Forrest: Documentation Framework
Apache Forrest: documentation framework Apache Forrest (forrest.apache.org) is a publishing framework that transforms input from various sources into a unified presentation in one or more output formats. The modular and extensible plugin architecture is based on Apache Cocoon and relevant standards, which separates presentation from content. Forrest can generate static documents, or be used as a dynamic server, or be deployed by its automated facility. By separating content from presentation, providing content templates and pre-written skins, Forrest is unequalled at enabling content producers to get their message out fast. This separation of concerns makes Forrest excellent to publish project documentation (notably software projects), intranets, and home pages. Forrest is built on one of the world's leading XML application frameworks, Apache Cocoon, which provides advanced users with extremely powerful publishing capabilities. • Multiple task-specific source XML formats can be used (How-To, FAQ, changelogs and todo lists supported natively). Source formats include: Apache xdocs xml format, plain html documents, some Wiki formats, a subset of DocBook, ... • Multiple output formats supported, for example HTML and PDF (using Apache FOP). • SVG to PNG rendering (using Apache Batik). Simply drop the SVG in the appropriate directory and it will be rendered as PNG. • Transparent inclusion and aggregation of external content, like RSS feeds. • Anything else possible with the Cocoon sitemap. Using database queries, charting, web services integration; the possibilities are constantly growing as Cocoon grows. See the Cocoon Features list for the full suite of capabilities. • Based on Java, Forrest is platform-independent, making for a documentation system that is just as portable as the XML data it processes. -
Full-Graph-Limited-Mvn-Deps.Pdf
org.jboss.cl.jboss-cl-2.0.9.GA org.jboss.cl.jboss-cl-parent-2.2.1.GA org.jboss.cl.jboss-classloader-N/A org.jboss.cl.jboss-classloading-vfs-N/A org.jboss.cl.jboss-classloading-N/A org.primefaces.extensions.master-pom-1.0.0 org.sonatype.mercury.mercury-mp3-1.0-alpha-1 org.primefaces.themes.overcast-${primefaces.theme.version} org.primefaces.themes.dark-hive-${primefaces.theme.version}org.primefaces.themes.humanity-${primefaces.theme.version}org.primefaces.themes.le-frog-${primefaces.theme.version} org.primefaces.themes.south-street-${primefaces.theme.version}org.primefaces.themes.sunny-${primefaces.theme.version}org.primefaces.themes.hot-sneaks-${primefaces.theme.version}org.primefaces.themes.cupertino-${primefaces.theme.version} org.primefaces.themes.trontastic-${primefaces.theme.version}org.primefaces.themes.excite-bike-${primefaces.theme.version} org.apache.maven.mercury.mercury-external-N/A org.primefaces.themes.redmond-${primefaces.theme.version}org.primefaces.themes.afterwork-${primefaces.theme.version}org.primefaces.themes.glass-x-${primefaces.theme.version}org.primefaces.themes.home-${primefaces.theme.version} org.primefaces.themes.black-tie-${primefaces.theme.version}org.primefaces.themes.eggplant-${primefaces.theme.version} org.apache.maven.mercury.mercury-repo-remote-m2-N/Aorg.apache.maven.mercury.mercury-md-sat-N/A org.primefaces.themes.ui-lightness-${primefaces.theme.version}org.primefaces.themes.midnight-${primefaces.theme.version}org.primefaces.themes.mint-choc-${primefaces.theme.version}org.primefaces.themes.afternoon-${primefaces.theme.version}org.primefaces.themes.dot-luv-${primefaces.theme.version}org.primefaces.themes.smoothness-${primefaces.theme.version}org.primefaces.themes.swanky-purse-${primefaces.theme.version} -
Towards Identifying Software Project Clusters with Regard to Defect Prediction
Towards identifying software project clusters with regard to defect prediction Marian Jureczko, Wroc!aw University of Technology Lech Madeyski, Wroc!aw University of Technology Agenda •! Introduction •! Data acquisition •! Study design •! Results •! Conclusions Introduction Motivation – Why defect prediction? 20% of classes contain 80% of defects We can use the software metrics to predict error prone classes and therefore prioritize and optimize tests. Motivation – Why clustering projects? •! Defect prediction is sometime impossible because lack of training data: –! It may be the first release of a project –! The company or the project may be to small to afford collecting training data •! With well defined project clusters the cross-project defect prediction will be possible Definitions •!Defect -! Interpreted as a defect in the investigated project -! Commented in the version control system (CVS or SVN) •!Defect prediction model Values of Metrics for a given java class Estimated •!WMC = ... Number •!DIT = ... Model of •!NOC = ... •!CBO = ... Defects •!RFC = … •!LCOM = … •!Ca=... •!.... Data acquisition •! 19 different metrics were calculated with the CKJM tool (http://gromit.iiar.pwr.wroc.pl/p_inf/ckjm) •! Chidamber & Kemerer metrics suite •! QMOOD metrics suite •! Tang, Kao and Chen’s metrics (C&K quality oriented extension) •! Cyclomatic Complexity, LCOM3, Ca, Ce and LOC •! Defects were collected with BugInfo ( http://kenai.com/projects/buginfo) Compare CVS/SVN Bug CVS log against given & SVN regular expression metrics repository Data -
Kuali Student Service System: Technical Architecture Phase 1 Recommendations
Kuali Student Service System Technical Architecture Phase 1 Recommendations Kuali Student Service System Technical Architecture Phase 1 Recommendations December 31 2007 Kuali Student Technical Team Technical Architecture Phase 1 deliverables 2/14/2008 1 Kuali Student Service System Technical Architecture Phase 1 Recommendations Table of Contents 1 OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................................ 4 1.1 REASON FOR THE INVESTIGATION ................................................................................... 4 1.2 SCOPE OF THE INVESTIGATION ....................................................................................... 4 1.3 METHODOLOGY OF THE INVESTIGATION .......................................................................... 4 1.4 CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................... 5 1.5 DECISIONS THAT HAVE BEEN DELAYED ............................................................................ 6 2 STANDARDS ..................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 7 2.2 W3C STANDARDS .......................................................................................................... 7 2.3 OASIS STANDARDS ......................................................................................................