DOCSLIB.ORG

World Bank Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
World Bank Document SFG1876 V3 REV Public Disclosure Authorized Republic of Uganda Department of Refugees, Office of the Prime Minister Regional Operation on Development Response to Displacement Project in the Horn of Africa - Uganda Project Public Disclosure Authorized Updated Environmental and Social Management Framework-ESMF Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized January, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................................... i ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................................................... iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................... v 1 REGIONAL OPERATION ON DEVELOPMENT RESPONSE TO DISPLACEMENT IN THE HORN OF AFRICA ................ 1 1.1 background .................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Towards a more comprehensive refugee response ..................................................................................... 1 1.3 THE PROJECT ................................................................................................................................................ 7 1.4 Project context ............................................................................................................................................. 7 1.5 Project Justification ...................................................................................................................................... 8 2 The Environmental and Social Management Framework ................................................................................... 13 2.1 Objectives and scope of ESMF ................................................................................................................... 13 2.2 Updating the Environment and Social Management Framework (ESMF) ................................................. 13 3 BASELINE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL INFORMATION .................................................................................. 16 3.1 ADJUMANI ................................................................................................................................................. 16 3.2 Arua district ................................................................................................................................................ 21 3.3 The economy .............................................................................................................................................. 25 3.4 HOIMA DISTRICT ........................................................................................................................................ 27 3.5 ISINGIRO DISTRICT ..................................................................................................................................... 30 3.6 KAMWENGE DISTRICT ................................................................................................................................ 35 3.7 KIRYANDONGO .......................................................................................................................................... 39 3.8 Koboko district ........................................................................................................................................... 43 3.9 KYEGEGWA DISTRICT ................................................................................................................................. 47 3.10 LAMWO DISTRICT ....................................................................................................................................... 49 3.11 MOYO DISTRICT .......................................................................................................................................... 53 3.12 Yumbe District ............................................................................................................................................ 57 4 POLICY AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK ....................................................................................................................... 63 4.1 The Policy Framework ................................................................................................................................ 63 i 4.2 National Legal Framework ......................................................................................................................... 65 4.3 INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL INSTRUMENTS ratified by UGANDA .................................................. 69 4.4 World Bank Safeguard Policies And EHS Guidelines .................................................................................. 71 5 STAKEHOLDER AND COMMUNITY CONSULTATIONS AND DISCLOSURE ............................................................. 73 5.1 OVERVIEW .................................................................................................................................................. 73 5.2 GOALS OF CONSULTATIONS ....................................................................................................................... 73 5.3 OBJECTIVES OF STAKEHOLDER AND COMMUNITY CONSULTATIONS ........................................................ 73 5.4 Stakeholders Consulted and Issues Raised ................................................................................................ 73 5.5 FUTURE CONSULTATIONS .......................................................................................................................... 74 6 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND SCREENING PROCESS .............................................................................. 76 6.1 Overview .................................................................................................................................................... 76 6.2 Screening of projects .................................................................................................................................. 76 6.3 Other Environmental Safeguard Instruments and Guidance Procedures ............................................... 79 6.4 GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM ............................................................................................................ 81 6.5 Pest Management Plan .............................................................................................................................. 84 7 PROJECT ACTIVITIES, GENERIC IMPACTS AND MITIGATIONS MEASURES .......................................................... 88 7.1 PROJECT ACTIVITIES ................................................................................................................................... 88 7.2 POSITIVE PROJECT IMPACTS of drdip interventions .................................................................................. 88 7.3 Negative impacts and Mitigation Measures for water storage/dams facilities ......................................... 91 7.4 Potential Negative Impacts and Mitigations for health CENTERS interventions ....................................... 93 7.5 PARTICIPATION OF VULNERABLE GROUPS .............................................................................................. 107 7.6 DETAILED PROJECT INSTITUTIONAL IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS ........................................... 110 7.7 Implementation OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................................... 111 7.8 CAPACITY BUILDING ................................................................................................................................ 115 7.9 MONITORING AND EVALUATION ............................................................................................................ 116 7.10 REPORTING .............................................................................................................................................. 116 7.11 BUDGET AND DISCLOSURE OF ESMF........................................................................................................ 117 ii 8 CONCLUSION and recommendations ............................................................................................................... 119 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................................................... 120 9 ANNEXES ........................................................................................................................................................... 122 9.1 Annex 1: ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL SCREENING DATASHEET FOR DRDIP Uganda ....................... 122 9.2 Annex 2: Minutes of Stakeholder consultations and Meeting minutes Lamwo ...................................... 126 9.3 annex 3: Stakeholder consultations and Meeting minutes Moyo ........................................................... 131 9.4 annex 4: Stakeholder consultations and Meeting minutes Yumbe ......................................................... 138 9.5 Annex 5: Stakeholder consultations and Meeting minutes Koboko ........................................................ 145 9.6 Annex 6: SOME OF THE KEY STAKEHOLDER COMMUNITY CONCERNS AND VIEWS in the additional districts 152
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Performance Snapshot Kiryandongo Q2
    Performance Snapshot Quarter 2 Uganda Refugee Response Plan (RRP) 2020-2021 January - June 2020 67,712 Kiryandongo Refugee Settlement Refugees & Asylum Seekers 23 Partners 10,379 HHs Arua Sub-Office Sector Actual status per key indicator Target/Standard (2020 revised) Actual against annual target or standard 68% children of school going age 100% 68% 32% enrolled in primary school (Based on 2020 0 20 40 60 80 100 Q1 data) Actual The pupil teacher ratio for primary 1:71 Education Target schools was 1:68 (Based on 2020 Q1 data) 0 15 30 45 60 75 2,893 households using alternative 9,347 (target) 0 31% 20 0% 40 59% 60 80 10% 100 and/or renewable energy (2018 + 1/HH (standard) 2019 achievement 2020 contribution 2020 target 2019 + Q2 2020 achievement) 57.31 hectares of forests, wetlands, Environment & riverbanks and lakeshores protected 110 ha 0 52% 20 40 60 80 100 Energy and restored 65,862 refugees received monthly 67,712 Individuals Cash In-kind cash for food and in-kind assistance 0 20 40 60 80 100 (74% cash and 24% food) Food 14% of HH with poor or borderline 18% (original 2020 target) Security Food Consumption Score <20% (standard) 0 4 8 12 16 20 The severe Acute Malnutrition 75% (target) Actual recovery rate was 92% > 75% (standard) Target/standard 0 20 40 60 80 100 Actual Health & The under-five mortality rate was 0.05 0.1 (target) Target/standard Nutrition per 1,000 children < 1.5 (standard) 0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1,874 Refugee households received 6,605 HHs 28% emergency livelihood support 0 20 40 60 80 100 Livelihoods & 17 refugees
    [Show full text]
  • Vote:592 Kiryandongo District Quarter2
    Local Government Quarterly Performance Report FY 2019/20 Vote:592 Kiryandongo District Quarter2 Terms and Conditions I hereby submit Quarter 2 performance progress report. This is in accordance with Paragraph 8 of the letter appointing me as an Accounting Officer for Vote:592 Kiryandongo District for FY 2019/20. I confirm that the information provided in this report represents the actual performance achieved by the Local Government for the period under review. Dorothy Ajwang Date: 21/01/2020 cc. The LCV Chairperson (District) / The Mayor (Municipality) 1 Local Government Quarterly Performance Report FY 2019/20 Vote:592 Kiryandongo District Quarter2 Summary: Overview of Revenues and Expenditures Overall Revenue Performance Ushs Thousands Approved Budget Cumulative Receipts % of Budget Received Locally Raised Revenues 1,170,478 346,519 30% Discretionary Government 7,859,507 2,085,666 27% Transfers Conditional Government Transfers 16,481,710 8,272,347 50% Other Government Transfers 18,788,628 2,662,300 14% External Financing 2,892,864 262,814 9% Total Revenues shares 47,193,187 13,629,646 29% Overall Expenditure Performance by Workplan Ushs Thousands Approved Cumulative Cumulative % Budget % Budget % Releases Budget Releases Expenditure Released Spent Spent Administration 4,782,995 1,627,099 1,271,940 34% 27% 78% Finance 317,030 154,177 154,131 49% 49% 100% Statutory Bodies 554,535 276,729 202,155 50% 36% 73% Production and Marketing 3,437,596 576,003 475,332 17% 14% 83% Health 4,965,161 2,206,835 2,162,305 44% 44% 98% Education 10,952,604
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Settled Refugees and the Impact on Service Delivery in Koboko
    Self-Settled Refugees and the Impact on Service Delivery in Koboko Municipal Council Empowering Refugee Hosting Districts in Uganda: Making the Nexus Work II2 Empowering Refugee Hosting Districts in Uganda: Making the Nexus Work Foreword This report ‘Self-Settled Refugees and the Impact on Service Delivery in Koboko Municipal Council’ comes in a time when local governments in Uganda are grappling with the effects of refugees who have moved and settled in urban areas. As a country we have been very welcoming to our brothers and sisters who have been seeking refuge and we are proud to say that we have been able to assist the ones in need. Nonetheless, we cannot deny that refugees have been moving out of the gazetted settlements and into the urban areas, which has translated into increasing demands on the limited social amenities and compromises the quality of life for both refugees and host communities, this whilst the number of self-settled refugees continues to grow. This report aims to address the effects the presence self-settled refugees have on urban areas and the shortfalls local governments face in critical service delivery areas like education, health, water, livelihoods and the protection of self-settled refugees if not properly catered for. So far, it has been difficult for the local governments to substantiate such cases in the absence of reliable data. We are therefore very pleased to finally have a reference document, which addresses the unnoticed and yet enormous challenges faced by urban authorities hosting refugees, such as Koboko Municipal Council. This document provides us with more accurate and reliable data, which will better inform our planning, and enhances our capacity to deliver more inclusive services.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Public Disclosure Authorized ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT AND MONITORING PLAN Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development Rural Electrification Agency ENERGY FOR RURAL TRANSFORMATION PHASE III GRID INTENSIFICATION SCHEMES PACKAGED UNDER WEST NILE, NORTH NORTH WEST, AND NORTHERN SERVICE TERRITORIES Public Disclosure Authorized JUNE, 2019 i LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS CDO Community Development Officer CFP Chance Finds Procedure DEO District Environment Officer ESMP Environmental and Social Management and Monitoring Plan ESMF Environmental Social Management Framework ERT III Energy for Rural Transformation (Phase 3) EHS Environmental Health and Safety EIA Environmental Impact Assessment ESMMP Environmental and Social Mitigation and Management Plan GPS Global Positioning System GRM Grievance Redress Mechanism MEMD Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development NEMA National Environment Management Authority OPD Out Patient Department OSH Occupational Safety and Health PCR Physical Cultural Resources PCU Project Coordination Unit PPE Personal Protective Equipment REA Rural Electrification Agency RoW Right of Way UEDCL Uganda Electricity Distribution Company Limited WENRECO West Nile Rural Electrification Company ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ......................................................... ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................ iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of COVID-19 on Refugee and Host Community Livelihoods ILO PROSPECTS Rapid Assessment in Two Refugee Settlements of Uganda
    X Impact of COVID-19 on Refugee and Host Community Livelihoods ILO PROSPECTS Rapid Assessment in two Refugee Settlements of Uganda X Impact of COVID-19 on Refugee and Host Community Livelihoods ILO PROSPECTS Rapid Assessment in two Refugee Settlements of Uganda Copyright © International Labour Organization 2021 First published 2021 Publications of the International Labour Office enjoy copyright under Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. Nevertheless, short excerpts from them may be reproduced without authorization, on condition that the source is indicated. For rights of reproduction or translation, application should be made to ILO Publishing (Rights and Licensing), International Labour Office, CH-1211 Geneva 22, Switzerland, or by email: [email protected]. The ILO and FAO welcome such applications. Libraries, institutions and other users registered with a reproduction rights organization may make copies in accordance with the licences issued to them for this purpose. Visit www.ifrro.org to find the reproduction rights organization in your country. Impact of COVID-19 on Refugee and Host Community Livelihoods ILO PROSPECTS Rapid Assessment in two Refugee Settlements of Uganda ISBN 978-92-2-034720-1 (Print) ISBN 978-92-2-034719-5 (Web PDF) The designations employed in ILO publications, which are in conformity with United Nations practice, and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the International Labour Office concerning the legal status of any country, area or territory or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers. The responsibility for opinions expressed in signed articles, studies and other contributions rests solely with their authors, and publication does not constitute an endorsement by the International Labour Office of the opinions expressed in them.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey Highlights on Self-Settled Refugees in Koboko Municipal
    Survey Highlights on Self-Settled Refugees in Koboko Municipal Council Empowering Refugee Hosting Districts in Uganda: Making the Nexus Work Introduction to the Survey This report presents the Highlights of the household survey conducted on Self-Settled Refugees in Koboko Municipal Council (July- August 2018), as part of the Programme “Strengthening Refugee Hosting Districts in Uganda: Making the Nexus Work”. The programme is implemented by VNG International (the international cooperation agency of the Association of Netherlands Municipalities) and financed by the Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Koboko District Local Government is one of the beneficiaries within the programme, along with Adjumani and Yumbe District Local Governments. The Uganda Local Government Association (ULGA) is a key partner in this programme. The survey was premised on the fact that in Koboko Municipal Council the presence of self-settled refugees puts a lot of strain on the already stressed service delivery and is posing significant challenges to the local government. Some of the notable challenges include: conflicts with the law, rampant cases of child neglect and abuse, prostitution, theft and armed robberies and conflicts with the host communities over natural resources and food scarcity. Besides the above, the host communities are grappling with a strain on healthcare provision, congestion in schools and at water points, poor waste management and sanitation, scarcity of housing and rising prices of goods and services. The presence of self-settled refugees has not been provided for in the district and municipal budgeting process, given that census data 2014 serve as a basis for planning and therefore no additional funding is guaranteed by the government and development partners.
    [Show full text]
  • Opportunities to Provide Refugees and Ugandans with Alternative Livelihood Activities in Uganda’S Kamwenge District
    This report is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the support of the Office of Health, Infectious Diseases, and Nutrition, Bureau for Global Health, U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and the Office of Food for Peace, under terms of Cooperative Agreement No. AID-OAA-A-12-00005, through the Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance III Project (FANTA), managed by FHI 360. The contents are the responsibility of FHI 360 and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. Recommended Citation: Mathys, Ellen. 2016. Opportunities to Provide Refugees and Ugandans with Alternative Livelihood Activities in Uganda’s Kamwenge District. Washington, DC: FHI 360/FANTA. Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance III Project (FANTA) FHI 360 1825 Connecticut Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20009-5721 T 202-884-8000 F 202-884-8432 [email protected] www.fantaproject.org Opportunities to Provide Refugees and Ugandans with Alternative Livelihood Activities in Uganda’s Kamwenge District Contents Abbreviations and Acronyms .............................................................................................................. i Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 1 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 2 2. Displacement Context: Refugee Settlements and Refugee Hosting Districts
    [Show full text]
  • WHO UGANDA BULLETIN February 2016 Ehealth MONTHLY BULLETIN
    WHO UGANDA BULLETIN February 2016 eHEALTH MONTHLY BULLETIN Welcome to this 1st issue of the eHealth Bulletin, a production 2015 of the WHO Country Office. Disease October November December This monthly bulletin is intended to bridge the gap between the Cholera existing weekly and quarterly bulletins; focus on a one or two disease/event that featured prominently in a given month; pro- Typhoid fever mote data utilization and information sharing. Malaria This issue focuses on cholera, typhoid and malaria during the Source: Health Facility Outpatient Monthly Reports, Month of December 2015. Completeness of monthly reporting DHIS2, MoH for December 2015 was above 90% across all the four regions. Typhoid fever Distribution of Typhoid Fever During the month of December 2015, typhoid cases were reported by nearly all districts. Central region reported the highest number, with Kampala, Wakiso, Mubende and Luweero contributing to the bulk of these numbers. In the north, high numbers were reported by Gulu, Arua and Koti- do. Cholera Outbreaks of cholera were also reported by several districts, across the country. 1 Visit our website www.whouganda.org and follow us on World Health Organization, Uganda @WHOUganda WHO UGANDA eHEALTH BULLETIN February 2016 Typhoid District Cholera Kisoro District 12 Fever Kitgum District 4 169 Abim District 43 Koboko District 26 Adjumani District 5 Kole District Agago District 26 85 Kotido District 347 Alebtong District 1 Kumi District 6 502 Amolatar District 58 Kween District 45 Amudat District 11 Kyankwanzi District
    [Show full text]
  • REPUBLIC of UGANDA Public Disclosure Authorized UGANDA NATIONAL ROADS AUTHORITY
    E1879 VOL.3 REPUBLIC OF UGANDA Public Disclosure Authorized UGANDA NATIONAL ROADS AUTHORITY FINAL DETAILED ENGINEERING Public Disclosure Authorized DESIGN REPORT CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED ENGINEERING DESIGN FOR UPGRADING TO PAVED (BITUMEN) STANDARD OF VURRA-ARUA-KOBOKO-ORABA ROAD Public Disclosure Authorized VOL IV - ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Public Disclosure Authorized The Executive Director Uganda National Roads Authority (UNRA) Plot 11 Yusuf Lule Road P.O.Box AN 7917 P.O.Box 28487 Accra-North Kampala, Uganda Ghana Feasibility Study and Detailed Design ofVurra-Arua-Koboko-Road Environmental Social Impact Assessment Final Detailed Engineering Design Report TABLE OF CONTENTS o EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................. 0-1 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE PROJECT ROAD........................................................................................ I-I 1.3 NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDy ...................................... 1-3 1.4 OBJECTIVES OF THE ESIA STUDY ............................................................................................... 1-3 2 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 INITIAL MEETINGS WITH NEMA AND UNRA............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation Status & Results
    The World Bank Report No: ISR13907 Implementation Status & Results Uganda Second Northern Uganda Social Action Fund Project (NUSAF2) (P111633) Operation Name: Second Northern Uganda Social Action Fund Project Project Stage: Implementation Seq.No: 8 Status: ARCHIVED Archive Date: 03-May-2014 (NUSAF2) (P111633) Public Disclosure Authorized Country: Uganda Approval FY: 2009 Product Line:IBRD/IDA Region: AFRICA Lending Instrument: Specific Investment Loan Implementing Agency(ies): Key Dates Public Disclosure Copy Board Approval Date 28-May-2009 Original Closing Date 31-Aug-2014 Planned Mid Term Review Date 30-Jan-2012 Last Archived ISR Date 19-Nov-2013 Effectiveness Date 25-Nov-2009 Revised Closing Date 31-Aug-2014 Actual Mid Term Review Date 14-Jun-2013 Project Development Objectives Project Development Objective (from Project Appraisal Document) To improve access of beneficiary households in Northern Uganda to income earning opportunities and better basic socio-economic services. Has the Project Development Objective been changed since Board Approval of the Project? Yes No Public Disclosure Authorized Component(s) Component Name Component Cost Livelihood Investment Support 60.00 Community Infrastructure Rehabilitation 30.00 Institutional Development 10.00 Overall Ratings Previous Rating Current Rating Progress towards achievement of PDO Satisfactory Satisfactory Overall Implementation Progress (IP) Moderately Satisfactory Moderately Satisfactory Public Disclosure Authorized Overall Risk Rating Implementation Status Overview The NUSAF II project originally planned to finance 9750 (i.e. 8000 Household Income Support (HIS), 1000 Public Works (PW) and 750 Community Infrastructure Rehabilitation) sub projects in the five year of its implementation period. As of February 3, 2013 a total of 8,764 subprojects (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • S41018-021-00105-8.Pdf
    Bako et al. Journal of International Humanitarian Action (2021) 6:17 Journal of International https://doi.org/10.1186/s41018-021-00105-8 Humanitarian Action RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Towards attaining the recommended Humanitarian Sphere Standards of sanitation in Bidibidi refugee camp found in Yumbe District, Uganda Zaitun Bako1, Alex Barakagira1,2* and Ameria Nabukonde1 Abstract Adequate sanitation is one of the most important aspects of community well-being. It reduces the rates of morbidity and severity of various diseases like diarrhea, dysentery, and typhoid among others. A study about toward the attainment of the recommended Humanitarian Sphere Standards on sanitation in Bidibidi refugee camp, Yumbe District, was initiated. A total of 210 households distributed in Bidibidi refugee camp were randomly selected and one adult person interviewed to assess the accessibility of different sanitation facilities, and to explore the sanitation standards of the sanitation facilities in relation to the recommended Humanitarian Sphere Standards in the area. Pit latrines, hand washing facilities, and solid waste disposal areas as reported by 81.4%, 86.7%, and 51.9% of the respondents respectively, are the main sanitation facilities accessed in the refugee camp. Despite their accessibility, the standards of the pit latrines, hand washing, and solid waste disposal facilities are below the recommended standards, which might have contributed to the outbreak of sanitation related diseases (χ2 = 19.66, df = 1, P = 0.05) in Bidibidi refugee camp. The respondents in the study area were aware that the presence of the sanitation-related diseases was because of the low-level sanitation practices in place (χ2 = 4.54, df = 1, P = 0.05).
    [Show full text]
  • Funding Going To
    % Funding going to Funding Country Name KP‐led Timeline Partner Name Sub‐awardees SNU1 PSNU MER Structural Interventions Allocated Organizations HTS_TST Quarterly stigma & discrimination HTS_TST_NEG meetings; free mental services to HTS_TST_POS KP clients; access to legal services PrEP_CURR for KP PLHIV PrEP_ELIGIBLE Centro de Orientacion e PrEP_NEW Dominican Republic $ 1,000,000.00 88.4% MOSCTHA, Esperanza y Caridad, MODEMU Region 0 Distrito Nacional Investigacion Integral (COIN) PrEP_SCREEN TX_CURR TX_NEW TX_PVLS (D) TX_PVLS (N) TX_RTT Gonaives HTS_TST KP sensitization focusing on Artibonite Saint‐Marc HTS_TST_NEG stigma & discrimination, Nord Cap‐Haitien HTS_TST_POS understanding sexual orientation Croix‐des‐Bouquets KP_PREV & gender identity, and building Leogane PrEP_CURR clinical providers' competency to PrEP_CURR_VERIFY serve KP FY19Q4‐ KOURAJ, ACESH, AJCCDS, ANAPFEH, APLCH, CHAAPES, PrEP_ELIGIBLE Haiti $ 1,000,000.00 83.2% FOSREF FY21Q2 HERITAGE, ORAH, UPLCDS PrEP_NEW Ouest PrEP_NEW_VERIFY Port‐au‐Prince PrEP_SCREEN TX_CURR TX_CURR_VERIFY TX_NEW TX_NEW_VERIFY Bomu Hospital Affiliated Sites Mombasa County Mombasa County not specified HTS_TST Kitui County Kitui County HTS_TST_NEG CHS Naishi Machakos County Machakos County HTS_TST_POS Makueni County Makueni County KP_PREV CHS Tegemeza Plus Muranga County Muranga County PrEP_CURR EGPAF Timiza Homa Bay County Homa Bay County PrEP_CURR_VERIFY Embu County Embu County PrEP_ELIGIBLE Kirinyaga County Kirinyaga County HWWK Nairobi Eastern PrEP_NEW Tharaka Nithi County Tharaka Nithi County
    [Show full text]