2021.07.22 Regular Council Meeting Packet W Agenda

AMENDED - AGENDA Regular Meeting July 22, 2021, at 5:30 PM Legion Hall – Below City Hall 216 East Park Street City Council McCall, ID AND MS TEAMS Virtual

ANNOUNCEMENT: Due to McCall’s commitment to stay healthy in response to the COVID-19 Emergency and ensuring that the City’s Business continues, this will be both an in person and virtual meeting. The Legion Hall’s 6-foot social distancing Occupancy Capacity is 15. The Council Members and staff who are anticipated to be in attendance is 8. The first 7 persons who appear will be allowed to be present in the meeting location. Social distancing will be enforced. All other persons may be in attendance virtually. Any member of the public can join and listen only to the meeting at 5:30 p.m. by calling in as follows: Dial 208-634-8900 when asked for the Conference ID enter: 827 785 686# Or you may watch live by clicking this link: https://youtu.be/I9MKfzZmipA

OPEN SESSION

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

APPROVE THE AGENDA

CONSENT AGENDA All matters which are listed within the consent section of the agenda have been distributed to each member of the McCall City Council for reading and study. Items listed are considered routine by the Council and will be enacted with one motion unless a Council Member specifically requests it to be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. Staff recommends approval of the following ACTION ITEMS: 1. Council Regular Meeting Minutes – May 24, 2021 2. Council Regular Meeting Minutes – June 10, 2021 3. Council Regular Meeting Minutes – June 24, 2021 4. Payroll Report for period ending July 9, 2021 (ACTION ITEM) 5. Warrant Register – GL (ACTION ITEM) 6. Warrant Register – Vendor (ACTION ITEM) 7. AB 21-187 City Licenses Report to Council Per McCall City Code (ACTION ITEM) 8. AB 21-190 Treasurer’s Report as Required by IC 50-208 (ACTION ITEM) 9. AB 21-186 Request Acceptance of the Federal Aviation Administration grant award for the design portion of the new East-West taxiway (ACTION ITEM) 10. AB 21-196 Request Approval of Hangar 523 Lease Terminations for Hafenfeld and SEICO (ACTION ITEM) 11. AB 21-193 Request to Approve the Second Extension of Agreement for City Attorney/Civil Legal Services with White Peterson Gigray & Nichols, P.A. (ACTION ITEM)

Page 1 of 2 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA July 22, 2021 AMENDED 7/20/21 TO REMOVE AB 21-185 Request to Approve Exhibit A-Guaranteed Maximum Price Amendment to the CM/GC contract with CM Company for the Parks Relocation Project GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT – HOW TO SUBMIT COMMENTS Public comment will be accepted in writing prior to the meeting. To ensure that the Council receives all comments prior to the meeting, all comments must be submitted prior to 3:00 pm on July 22, 2021. There is a link to submit your written comment on the City’s website at https://www.mccall.id.us/packets If a member of the public would like to make comment during the live meeting online or to call-in, please sign up at www.mccall.id.us/packets prior to 3:00 pm on July 22, 2021. Once we receive your request to make public comment, a link will be sent to you with instructions. Members of the public are also welcomed to attend the meeting in person; however, space is limited due to social distancing requirements and only 7 members of the public may attend. Again – written comments are preferred.

WORK SESSION AB 21-197 Title 4 Business Regulations Discussion Regarding Possible Code Amendments (ACTION ITEM)

REPORTS AB 21-189 McCall Area Planning and Zoning Commission Annual Report to City Council

AB 21-188 McCall Police Department Presentation of Public Safety for the 4th of July

BUSINESS AGENDA AB 21-194 Library G.O. Bond Issue Preview, Discussion, and Request to Utilize a Negotiated Bond Sale Process and Authorize Zion’s Public Finance to Circulate the Request For Proposal for an Underwriter (ACTION ITEM)

AB 21-185 Request to Approve Exhibit A-Guaranteed Maximum Price Amendment to the CM/GC contract with CM Company for the Parks Relocation Project (ACTION ITEM) MOVED TO THE August 12th Meeting

AB 21-192 Request for Council to Adopt Ordinance 1003 Regarding Prohibiting the Feeding of Wildlife (ACTION ITEM)

AB 21-191 Request Approval of the ROS-20-03 Warranty Deed for Right of Way Dedication (ACTION ITEM)

AB 21-195 Mayor and Council Compensation Discussion and Direction to Staff (ACTION ITEM)

Covid-19 Update and Review of Mask Metrics Status

Upcoming Meeting Schedule Discussion

ADJOURN

Page 2 of 2 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA July 22, 2021 AMENDED 7/20/21 TO REMOVE AB 21-185 Request to Approve Exhibit A-Guaranteed Maximum Price Amendment to the CM/GC contract with CM Company for the Parks Relocation Project

MINUTES

McCall City Council Regular Meeting McCall City Hall -- Legion Hall VIA TEAMS Virtual May 27, 2021

Call to Order and Roll Call Pledge of Allegiance Approve the Agenda Consent Agenda Work Session Public Comment Reports Business Agenda Adjournment

CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL

Mayor Giles called the regular meeting of the McCall City Council to order at 5:30 p.m. Mayor Giles, Council Member Callan, Council Member Holmes, Council Member Maciaszek, and Council Member Nielsen all answered roll call.

City staff members present were Anette Spickard, City Manager; Bill Nichols, City Attorney; BessieJo Wagner, City Clerk; Erin Greaves, Communications Manager; Linda Stokes, City Treasurer; Delta James, Economic Development Planner; Rick Stein, Airport Manager; Eric McCormick, Golf Course Superintendent; Chris Curtin, Information Systems Manager; Traci Malvich, Human Resources Manager; Justin Williams, Police Chief; Krystal Giessen, Code Enforcement; Vlatko Jovanov, Network Administrator; Krystal Giessen, Code Enforcement Officer

Also, in attendance were Regan Berkley, Idaho Fish and Game; Karla Eitel, Public Art Advisory Committee Member

Mayor Giles led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance.

APPROVE THE AGENDA

Council Member Nielsen moved to approve the agenda as submitted. Council Member Callan seconded the motion. In a voice vote all members voted aye, and the motion carried.

MCCALL CITY COUNCIL Page 1 of 10 May 27, 2021 Regular Meeting

CONSENT AGENDA

Staff recommended approval of the following ACTION ITEMS. All matters which are listed within the consent section of the agenda have been distributed to each member of the McCall City Council for reading and study. Items listed are considered routine by the Council and were enacted with one motion. 1. Payroll Report for period ending May 14, 2021 2. Warrant Register – GL 3. Warrant Register – Vendor 4. AB 21-149 City Licenses Report to Council Per McCall City Code: Per McCall City Code Title 4 Chapter 9, the City Council has determined the City Clerk shall be delegated the authority to process and grant or deny all alcoholic beverage license applications, other than certain circumstances involving catering permits, which the City Clerk shall review the application for catering permit for completeness and forward said application to the Police Chief. The Police Chief upon receipt of the application shall make a recommendation to the City Clerk to approve or deny the application. Whenever the City Clerk shall determine that an application for alcoholic beverage license transfer or renewal is complete, the City Clerk shall approve or deny such application. All decisions of the City Clerk shall be reported to the City Council at the next regularly scheduled City Council meeting after such decision. The City Clerk is also responsible for all processing of business, taxi, snow removal, pawnbroker, child daycare licenses, vendor permits, and public event applications. Action: Council to review the License report. 5. AB 21-141 Council’s Review of the Treasurer’s Report as Required by IC 50-208: Treasurer’s report of accounts and activity of office during the month of April 2021 regarding care, management or disposition of moneys, property, or business of the City. Action: The Council shall examine the report and determine whether additional information from the Treasurer is required. 6. AB 21-144 Request to Proclaim June 2021 as General Aviation Month: The Airport Open House will be held on Saturday, June 26th from 9:00a – 1:00p. In parallel with the Open House, the Open House Planning Committee has requested that the City create a proclamation proclaiming the month of June as General Aviation Month. The proclamation will underscore that the Airport is an important economic engine for McCall providing $42,000,000 in direct and indirect benefits. Action: Proclaim June 2021 as General Aviation Appreciation Month and authorize the Mayor to sign the proclamation. 7. AB 21-140 Request to Approve a Re-allocation of Local Option Tax Dollars for Manchester Ice Center: The Manchester Ice Center was allotted $10,500 for their Learn to Skate program. Due to Covid-19, they did not have as many students participating this year and have only used $7,500. They wish to use the remaining $3000 toward Bump and Skate field trips for 4th – 12th grade students. Action: Approve the request from Manchester Ice Center to re-allocate Local Option Tax funds of $3,000 toward the cost of Bump to Skate field trips and authorize the Mayor to sign all necessary documents.

Council Member Nielsen moved to approve the Consent Agenda as submitted. Council Member Callan seconded the motion. In a roll call vote Council Member Nielsen, Council

MCCALL CITY COUNCIL Page 2 of 10 May 27, 2021 Regular Meeting

Member Callan, Mayor Giles, Council Member Holmes, and Council Member Maciaszek all voted aye, and the motion carried.

WORK SESSION

AB 21-142 Presentation and Discussion Regarding Ordinance to Prohibit Wildlife Feeding Police Chief Justin Williams introduced the Wildlife Feeding discussion with Code Enforcement. This is the first touch with Council for policy direction on wildlife feeding. Staff requests direction on preparing a city ordinance to prohibit wildlife feeding for Council review at a future meeting.

Code Enforcement Officer Krystal Giessen presented. Through the years, many residents have practiced supplemental feeding of local wildlife. This habituation has caused a dangerous increase in the local population of deer, bear, and mountain lions. Officer Giessen shared her personal witness of feeding and the number of complaints from the community regarding the feeding of the deer. She gave statistics on how many and what type of calls the police department has responded to this year. McCall has experienced an increase in vehicle accidents involving the local town deer herd. Citizen complaints regarding deer destroying landscaping have increased. This year, the deer have destroyed thousands of dollars of new landscaping at the Golf Course, as well as established mature plants that they had previously never touched and will be very expensive to replace. These herds no longer migrate and reside in town year-round. Along with the safety and cost impacts there are herd health issues that have emerged. She went over the proposed ordinance. She began by investigating other communities with feeding ordinances such as Pocatello, Colorado Springs, and Missoula. She discussed wild bird feeders, and legal fishing, trapping, and hunting. The Police Department’s chief concern is public safety.

Regan Berkley, Regional Wildlife Manager from Idaho Fish and Game (IFG) gave a brief presentation regarding the deer herd and why they should not be fed. She shared that there have been 30 dead deer reported from vehicle incidents and malnutrition. She stated certain types of feed will starve the deer even though they are eating, and excessive deer in town also attract cougars. IFG have found deer that are almost bald from parasites which will cause them to die when the temperature drops. Ms. Berkley commented that this is a horrible way to die. Also, there have been reports of aggressive deer towards the public. She shared some stories of people and animals that have been injured by the deer.

Mayor Giles felt that what has been presented makes sense but wanted to know what will happen to the deer when feeding stops. Ms. Berkley stated that they would relocate as many of the deer as possible. However, there is some concern regarding exotic lice so a veterinary will be present during capture to identify the louse; as it would be detrimental to introduce the parasite into the wild herds, those deer identified as infected would be euthanized. IFG’s primary efforts will be to relocate. She shared that the relocated deer would transition well if put near wild herds.

Council Member Maciaszek thanked staff for bringing this forward. He asked if there has been reports of people being harmed by the deer. Police Chief Williams responded there have not been any humans injured yet but there have been many vehicular accidents concerning deer. The greater concern is the mountain lion population growth, especially near the hospital, as those animals propose a greater threat of human harm. Council Member Maciaszek feels this issue is very

MCCALL CITY COUNCIL Page 3 of 10 May 27, 2021 Regular Meeting

important. He also complemented Officer Giessen for her exemplary interaction with members of the public as he has heard nothing but good things from people. Ms. Berkley answered questions of the removal and relocation of deer in Riggins a few years ago with the same issue. Through trial and error, they discovered it is very difficult to eradicate the exotic louse, so the deer had to be euthanized. She guesses that there is a herd of more than 100 currently in McCall and it would be extremely difficult to recapture the same deer twice.

The Council did not have any questions and thanked staff and Ms. Berkley for the information. Council Member Callan and Mayor Giles both expressed support of the ordinance. Mayor Giles believes the transition will be tough but doable and summarized that Council would like staff to move forward with a draft ordinance.

Council Member Nielsen asked what the time frame is to reduce the deer population. Ms. Berkley stated IFG would implement a trapping program beginning the first winter following the passage of the ordinance. She explained trapping methods, and the trapping would continue over the next few years until it no longer produced successful results. She stated they would not be able to capture all the deer so there would be some still around during the winter. Police Chief Williams gave a brief overview of the educational aspect and aggressive marketing campaign to solve the issue. Officer Giessen feels education is most important. She briefly went over the enforcement levels (warning – infraction – misdemeanor) and stated there will be some tough language in the ordinance that will be hard for much of the public to hear. Everyone needs to pull together for good of the community to solve this issue.

Council Consensus to move forward with a draft ordinance

PUBLIC COMMENT

Mayor Giles called for public comment at 6:02 p.m.

No verbal comments were received during this part of the meeting. City Clerk BessieJo Wagner read the one written comment received:

5/26/21 9:46:31 Kilmeny Parker 500 Wanda Ave McCall, Idaho 83638 What is being done to combat the lack of Workforce Housing in McCall?

Hearing no more comments, Mayor Giles closed the comment period at 6:03 p.m.

REPORTS

AB 21-146 Public Art Advisory Committee Annual Report Karla Eitel, Chair of the Public Art Advisory Committee (PAAC) presented the annual PAAC report to City Council. The mission of the PAAC is to make recommendations to City Council regarding public art projects and policies within the City of McCall. The Public Art Advisory Committee was formed in 2012 by resolution of City Council (Resolution 12-13) and consists of seven volunteer members appointed by City Council to three-year terms. Ms. Eitel shared public

MCCALL CITY COUNCIL Page 4 of 10 May 27, 2021 Regular Meeting

engagement efforts, development of a 5-year comprehensive Public Art Plan, and the public art projects currently in progress.

Council expressed their appreciation of the Committee’s dedication and work to include the community in the process. Economic Development Planner Delta James gave a shout out to Communication Manager Erin Greaves for all her assistance in reaching out to the community.

BUSINESS AGENDA

AB 21-145 Request to submit a Payette Lakes Progressive Club Grant Application for City of McCall Youth Recreation Scholarships Economic Development Planner Delta James presented the Payette Lakes Progressive Club Grant Application for City of McCall Youth Recreation Scholarships. Parks and Recreation Department is requesting approval to submit a grant application to the Payette Lakes Progressive Club for up to $750 to fund scholarships for youth from economically challenged families to participate in recreation programs. Approximately $700 of local business sponsorships to the City’s youth scholarship fund received in FY21 will be used to document other funding support within the grant application. Over the last three years, scholarships have allowed twenty-five (25) youth to participate in City recreation programs such as soccer, baseball, mountain biking, basketball, rafting and more.

The Payette Lakes Progressive Club organizational goals include promotion of education and support for youth activities, which are consistent with the request to fund youth recreation scholarships.

The Council had no questions for staff.

Council Member Callan moved to approve submittal of a Progressive Club grant application for youth recreation scholarships and authorize the Mayor to sign all necessary documents. Council Member Nielsen seconded the motion. In a roll call vote Council Member Callan, Council Member Nielsen, Mayor Giles, Council Member Holmes, and Council Member Maciaszek all voted aye, and the motion carried.

AB 21-147 Request to appoint Terri Smith and Don Bailey to the McCall Historic Preservation Commission Economic Development Planner Delta James presented the request to appoint Terri Smith and Don Bailey to the McCall Historic Preservation Commission. Pursuant to McCall City Code (Title 3, Chapter 20), the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) consists of five (5) members and is responsible for recommending methods necessary to preserve, maintain and restore historic properties, recommends nominations of properties to the National Register of Historic Places, and conducts educational and interpretive programs. All members of the HPC “shall have a demonstrated interest, competence or knowledge in history or historic preservation. The Mayor and Council shall endeavor to appoint members with due regard to the proper representation of such fields as history, architecture, urban planning, archaeology and law.”

MCCALL CITY COUNCIL Page 5 of 10 May 27, 2021 Regular Meeting

Terri Smith and Don Bailey were appointed to the HPC in 2018, each to three-year terms which have now expired. Ms. Smith and Mr. Bailey have requested to be appointed to second three-year terms. A request for letters of interest in serving on the HPC was advertised in the Star News for three weeks and via City media outlets, but no responses have been received to date.

The Council had no questions for staff.

Council Member Holmes moved to appoint Terri Smith and Donn Bailey to three (3) year terms on the McCall Historic Preservation Commission expiring May 2024. Council Member Callan seconded the motion. In a roll call vote Council Member Holmes, Council Member Callan, Mayor Giles, Council Member Maciaszek, and Council Member Nielsen all voted aye, and the motion carried.

AB 21-148 Request to approve First Amendment to Artwork Commission Agreement for Urban Renewal Public Art Project Economic Development Planner Delta James presented the request to approve a First Amendment to Artwork Commission Agreement for Urban Renewal Public Art Project to Council. In February 2020, the McCall Redevelopment Agency (MRA) allocated funds to commission a professional artist to plan, design, fabricate and install public artwork within the existing east downtown urban renewal area. A Call to Artists (Request for Qualifications) was issued, nine qualified Idaho artists responded, and Amy Westover (dba Westover Artworks LLC) was unanimously selected for the project. The City, MRA and Westover entered into an Artwork Commission Agreement for the project scope in July 2020. In January 2021, the City unanimously approved the “Mill Whistle” public art design concept for Brown Park at the recommendation of the Artwork Selection Committee, McCall Public Art Advisory Committee, and MRA.

Subsequently, MRA allocated an additional $45,000 to provide portable steam generation equipment needed to complete the project. The First Amendment to the Artwork Commission Agreement, written by Elam & Burke, MRA’s legal firm updates the original agreement to incorporate these additional funds. The original plans were to purchase the parts off the shelf but that has proved to be far too costly so this amendment would allow the artist to work with a specialist craftsman subcontractor.

The Council had no questions for staff.

Council Member Nielsen moved to approve the First Amendment to Artwork Commission Agreement by and between the McCall Redevelopment Agency, City of McCall and Westover Artworks, LLC and authorize the Mayor to sign all necessary documents. Council Member Holmes seconded the motion. In a roll call vote Council Member Nielsen, Council Member Holmes, Mayor Giles, Council Member Callan, and Council Member Maciaszek all voted aye, and the motion carried.

AB 21-150 Request to submit Idaho Humanities Council Opportunity Grant for McCall History Bicycle Tour Economic Development Planner Delta James presented the request to submit Idaho Humanities Council Opportunity Grant for McCall History Bicycle Tour. The McCall Historic Preservation

MCCALL CITY COUNCIL Page 6 of 10 May 27, 2021 Regular Meeting

Commission (HPC) is requesting approval to apply to the Idaho Humanities Council Opportunity Grant program for $1000 to support a presentation by Nez Perce Tribe Cultural Resources Program Director Nakia Williamson as part of upcoming McCall History Bicycle Tour events. The bike tours are being promoted in partnership with the City’s recreation programs and organized by HPC members. Staff and volunteer in-kind time will be used to document the 1:1 required grant match.

The HPC is planning to hold two bike tours of key local historical sites and buildings on July 17 and September 11, 2021, beginning at 10:00 am. A stop along the bike route will include Rotary Park where participants view a cambium peeled Ponderosa Pine tree and Nakia Williamson will discuss the significance of the peeled cambium tree as it relates to local Indigenous culture.

The Council had no questions for staff.

Council Member Callan moved to approve submittal of an Idaho Humanities Council Opportunity Grant application for the McCall History Bicycle Tour and authorize the Mayor to sign all necessary documents. Council Member Nielsen seconded the motion. In a roll call vote Council Member Callan, Council Member Nielsen, Mayor Giles, Council Member Holmes, and Council Member Maciaszek all voted aye, and the motion carried.

AB 21-151 Request to Approve submittal of an Idaho Commission for Libraries American Rescue Plan Act Grant for the McCall Public Library Economic Development Planner Delta James presented the request to approve submittal of an Idaho Commission for Libraries American Rescue Plan Act Grant for the McCall Public Library. The federal American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) signed into law on March 11, 2021, designates funding through state library administrative agencies to help support Idaho libraries address the need for equitable access to broadband and quality digital content. There is no minimum or maximum grant request amount, but the McCall Public Library anticipates that its request will not exceed $75,000 and will be utilized in keeping with the grant program funding priorities to “support library services that meet the needs of communities, including costs such as technology, training, materials, supplies, equipment,” etc.

Staff provided an update of the details of the scope of the grant request. The Council had no questions for staff.

Council Member Nielsen moved to approve submittal of Idaho Commission for Libraries American Rescue Plan Act Grant and authorize the Mayor to sign all necessary documents. Council Member Holmes seconded the motion. In a roll call vote Council Member Nielsen, Council Member Holmes, Mayor Giles, Council Member Holmes, and Council Member Maciaszek all voted aye, and the motion carried.

AB 21-143 Request to Adopt Resolution 21-19 for Alcohol Restriction during the 2021 4th of July Celebration Police Chief Justin Williams presented Resolution 21-19 for Alcohol Restriction during the 2021 4th of July Celebration. On May 13, 2021, Council directed staff to prepare a proposed resolution to restrict alcohol possession and consumption at waterfront parks within city limits during the 4th of July weekend. Staff has prepared a draft resolution for review and adoption.

MCCALL CITY COUNCIL Page 7 of 10 May 27, 2021 Regular Meeting

The Council had no questions for staff.

Council Member Holmes moved to adopt Resolution 21-19 for Alcohol Restrictions and authorize the Mayor to sign all necessary documents. Council Member Callan seconded the motion. In a roll call vote Council Member Holmes, Council Member Callan, Mayor Giles, and Council Member Maciaszek all voted aye, Council Member Nielsen voted no, and the motion carried.

AB 21-137 Request to Approve a Fireworks Display Permit by the Sabala Foundation Mayor Giles disclosed he had been approached by John Sabala to talk about a couple of items, one being the fireworks display to which he advised Mr. Sabala to Central District Health. Mayor Giles did not feel his discussion with Mr. Sabala would affect his vote and requested advice on whether he would need to recuse, and City Attorney Bill Nichols stated it does not constitute any kind of a quasi-judicial matter so no recusal would be necessary.

City Clerk BessieJo Wagner presented the fireworks display permit by the Sabala Foundation. The Sabala Foundation has submitted a request and application for a June 26, 2021 Fireworks Display for the RJS Foundation Tournament. The Fireworks Display will be free and open to the public. The display application has been approved by the Fire Chief and the Police Chief.

McCall City Code states the following as it relates to Fireworks Displays: 5-3-430: PERMITTED POSSESSION: (A) A recognized civic organization having a genuine, material existence and purpose separate from obtaining a permit under this Section, may make application for a permit for a fireworks display …, to be held in connection with a national holiday or special local event. The application shall be made to the City Clerk, who shall route it through the police chief and fire chief and to the mayor and council. The mayor may make or direct such investigation as he may deem appropriate. The permit shall be issued or denied by the mayor and council, considered for these purposes to be the fire prevention bureau, based upon consideration of the nature of the occasion, the nature of the applicant, and the public safety. Any permit issued under this subsection shall be limited to one time only for which issued.

The Council had no questions for staff.

Council Member Nielsen moved to approve the Fireworks Display Permit for the Sabala Foundation for June 26, 2021 and authorize the Mayor to sign all necessary documents. Council Member Maciaszek seconded the motion. In a roll call vote Council Member Nielsen, Council Member Maciaszek, Mayor Giles, Council Member Callan, and Council Member Holmes all voted aye, and the motion carried.

AB 21-139 Request to Adopt Resolution 21-20 for the Authorization for the Transportation of Certain Records to the State Archives City Clerk BessieJo Wagner presented Resolution 21-20 authorizing the Transportation of Certain Records to the State Archives. Staff has been working with the State Historical Society to transfer historical records to the State Archives. The Historical Society is very excited to receive the records as the City has minutes and ordinances that are more than 100 years old. The Historical Society

MCCALL CITY COUNCIL Page 8 of 10 May 27, 2021 Regular Meeting

will restore and preserve these records into perpetuity. The Laserfiche Software allows staff to have all these records digitally, making them still accessible to the public. This project is many years in the making and staff is excited to see it happen. This type of item will generally be on the consent agenda going forward as staff plans to send documents annually to the State Archive.

The Council had no questions for staff and expressed their appreciation for the accomplishment.

Council Member Callan moved to adopt Resolution 21-20 authorizing the Transportation of Certain Records to the State Archives and authorize the Mayor to sign all necessary documents. Council Member Holmes seconded the motion. In a roll call vote Council Member Callan, Council Member Holmes, Mayor Giles, Council Member Maciaszek, and Council Member Nielsen all voted aye, and the motion carried.

AB 21-138 Request Ratification of the May 18, 2021 Special General Obligation Bond Election Results - Resolution 21-21 City Clerk BessieJo Wagner presented the ratification of the May 18, 2021, Special General Obligation Bond Election Results and Resolution 21-21. The Legislation went into effect on January 1, 2011, that establishes counties as the officials for all elections. Idaho Code §34-1205 and §34-1206 state that the county board of commissioners shall be the county board of canvassers and the county clerk shall serve as their secretary for this purpose; and the board shall examine and make a statement of the total number of votes cast for all candidates or special questions that shall have been voted upon at the election. The Valley County Board of Commissioners canvass results of the May 18, 2021 Special General Obligation Bond Election and Resolution 21-21 was added to the Council packet following the Valley County Board’s meeting on May 24th.

Idaho Code §50-1026 requires that a two-thirds (2/3) majority of the qualified electors voting at such election assent to the issuing of such bonds. As required by Idaho Law the results will be reflected in the Minutes of the Council showing the total number of votes cast at said election for and against the proposition was as follows: Total votes cast, 780; votes for, 608; votes against, 172. Therefore, the proposition passes with 77.95% in favor, as 66.67% of total votes must be in favor as required pursuant to Idaho Code §50-1026.

The Council had no questions for staff.

Council Member Callan moved to adopt Resolution 21-21 ratifying the Valley County Commissioners canvass of the May 18, 2021 Special General Obligation Bond Election and authorize the Mayor to sign all necessary documents. Council Member Holmes seconded the motion. In a roll call vote Council Member Callan, Council Member Holmes, Mayor Giles, Council Member Maciaszek, and Council Member Nielsen all voted aye, and the motion carried.

Covid-19 Update Police Chief Justin Williams presented the latest COVID-19 data. All the metrics are either under or right on the line, so no action is needed at this time. City Manager Anette Spickard shared the State Lieutenant Governor passed an executive order prohibiting mask mandates. City Attorney Bill Nichols stated he has not had a chance to review the executive order or check if the Lt.

MCCALL CITY COUNCIL Page 9 of 10 May 27, 2021 Regular Meeting

Governor has the power to override the current order. City Manager Spickard proceeded to give a vaccination update.

Upcoming Meetings Schedule Discussion Council discussed upcoming meetings. There will be no meeting on June 3, 2021.

ADJOURNMENT

Without further business, Mayor Giles adjourned the meeting at 6:59 p.m.

ATTEST: Robert S. Giles, Mayor

BessieJo Wagner, City Clerk

MCCALL CITY COUNCIL Page 10 of 10 May 27, 2021 Regular Meeting

MINUTES

McCall City Council Regular Meeting McCall City Hall -- Legion Hall VIA TEAMS Virtual June 10, 2021

Call to Order and Roll Call Pledge of Allegiance Approve the Agenda Consent Agenda Staff Introductions Chamber Department Reports Public Comment Business Agenda Adjournment

CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL

City staff members present were Anette Spickard, City Manager; Bill Nichols, City Attorney; BessieJo Wagner, City Clerk; Kurt Wolf, Parks and Recreation Director; Rick Stein, Airport Manager; Eric McCormick, Golf Course Superintendent; Meg Lojek, Library Director; Traci Malvich, Human Resources Manager; Justin Williams, Police Chief; Nathan Stewart, Public Works Director; Police Officer Jerry Tatum; Police Officer Jack Pape; Police Officer Roger Picard

Also, in attendance were Lindsey Harris, McCall Area Chamber of Commerce and Regan Berkley, Idaho Fish & Game

Mayor Giles led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance.

APPROVE THE AGENDA

Council Member Maciaszek moved to approve the agenda as submitted. Council Member Holmes seconded the motion. In a voice vote all members voted aye, and the motion carried.

CONSENT AGENDA

MCCALL CITY COUNCIL Page 1 of 8 June 10, 2021 Regular Meeting

Staff recommended approval of the following ACTION ITEMS. All matters which are listed within the consent section of the agenda have been distributed to each member of the McCall City Council for reading and study. Items listed are considered routine by the Council and were enacted with one motion. 1. Payroll Report for period ending May 28, 2021 2. Warrant Register – GL 3. Warrant Register – Vendor 4. Accept the Minutes of the following Committees a. Golf Advisory Committee – March 10, 2021 b. Housing Advisory Committee – July 27, 2020 c. Housing Advisory Committee – August 24, 2020 d. Housing Advisory Committee – September 28, 2020 e. Housing Advisory Committee – October 26, 2020 f. Housing Advisory Committee – November 30, 2020 g. Housing Advisory Committee – December 28, 2020 h. Library Board of Trustees – April 12, 2021 i. Local Option Tax Commission – April 1, 2021 j. Local Option Tax Commission – May 11, 2021 k. Local Option Tax Commission – May 12, 2021 l. Public Art Advisory Committee – April 26, 2021 m. Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee – February 3, 2021 n. Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee – March 17, 2021 o. Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee – April 21, 2021 p. Tree Advisory Committee – April 6, 2021 1. AB 21-159 City Licenses Report to Council Per McCall City Code: Per McCall City Code Title 4 Chapter 9, the City Council has determined the City Clerk shall be delegated the authority to process and grant or deny all alcoholic beverage license applications, other than certain circumstances involving catering permits, which the City Clerk shall review the application for catering permit for completeness and forward said application to the Police Chief. The Police Chief upon receipt of the application shall make a recommendation to the City Clerk to approve or deny the application. Whenever the City Clerk shall determine that an application for alcoholic beverage license transfer or renewal is complete, the City Clerk shall approve or deny such application. All decisions of the City Clerk shall be reported to the City Council at the next regularly scheduled City Council meeting after such decision. The City Clerk is also responsible for all processing of business, taxi, snow removal, pawnbroker, child daycare licenses, vendor permits, and public event applications. Action: Council to review the License report. 5. AB 21-157 Request to Approve the Chamber of Commerce July 4, 2021, Fireworks Display Permit: The McCall Area Chamber of Commerce is submitting a request for a firework display permit. They have executed an agreement with Garden State Fireworks, Inc. for conducting a firework display over Payette Lake. The attached application has been approved by both the Police Chief and the Fire Chief. Action: Approve the firework display permit for July 4, 2021 and authorize the mayor to sign all necessary documents. 6. AB 21-161 Request for Local Housing Incentive Program: Reimbursement Request for Thompson Place Condominiums, Units 5 and 6: The Thompson Place Condominiums located on Thompson Street were platted with 12 of the 16 units as deed restricted local

MCCALL CITY COUNCIL Page 2 of 8 June 10, 2021 Regular Meeting

housing. The McCall City Council adopted Resolution 19-02, Local Housing Incentive Program, that created a reimbursement incentive program for projects that meet the criteria of a deed restriction. Attached are units 5 and 6 that have executed the Deed Restriction for the Units with the new owners. Units 9 and 11 of the Thompson Place Condominiums with deed restrictions were previously approved by City Council. The deed restrictions have been reviewed by the City Attorney. Action: Approve the request for reimbursement of the amount of $10,000 each through the Local Housing Incentive Program for Units 5 and 6 of the Thompson Place Condominiums and authorize the mayor to sign all necessary documents.

Council Member Holmes moved to approve the Consent Agenda as submitted. Council Member Nielsen seconded the motion. In a roll call vote Council Member Holmes, Council Member Nielsen, Mayor Giles, Council Member Callan, and Council Member Maciaszek all voted aye, and the motion carried.

STAFF INTRODUCTIONS

AB 21-162 Introduction of New Police Department Staff Police Chief Justin Williams and Lieutenant Dallas Palmer presented the introduction of the three of four new members of the McCall Police Department:

Jerry Tatum, from Florida, is a 10-year army veteran whose last position before coming here was a felony probation officer. Jack Pape, also a marine veteran is from Star, Idaho. Both Officer Tatum and Office Pape have completed POST and field training. Roger Picard also from Florida and Marine Corps, was a Sheriff Deputy for 6 years. The department is at full staff for the first time in at least eight years.

The Council welcomed the new officers.

CHAMBER & DEPARTMENT REPORTS

Chamber of Commerce Lindsey Harris of McCall Area Chamber of Commerce gave a brief update to the Council. She shared the Elaine Haas Award recipients have been selected, Board elections are coming up, they launched the McCall Promise, and she announce the July 4th Guide deadline.

Department Reports The Council thanked staff for their thorough reports. Per Council Member Nielsen’s request, Public Works Direct Nathan Stewart gave a brief update on Spring Mountain Blvd and shared the hope is that the paving will be completed before the holiday weekend.

PUBLIC COMMENT

Mayor Giles called for public comment at 5:42 p.m.

MCCALL CITY COUNCIL Page 3 of 8 June 10, 2021 Regular Meeting

City Clerk BessieJo Wagner provided a summary of the comments received. The comments will be included at the end of the minutes as Attachment 1:

Council received 24 comments representing 22 members of the community. 9 Members of the community were in favor of the Ordinance prohibiting the feeding of wildlife, and 13 members expressed they were against the ordinance, however, many of the against comments were against the killing or moving of the deer, not necessarily the prohibition on the feeding of wildlife. No verbal comments were given.

Hearing no further comments, Mayor Giles closed the comment period.

BUSINESS AGENDA

AB 21-163 Request for Council to Review a Draft Ordinance Regarding Prohibiting the Feeding of Wildlife Police Chief Justin Williams presented the review of a Draft Ordinance regarding prohibiting the feeding of wildlife. On May 27, 2021, Council directed staff to continue with preparation of a proposed ordinance prohibiting the feeding of wildlife within the City of McCall. In cooperation with Idaho Fish and Game (IFG), staff has created the included draft ordinance for review and discussion.

Chief Williams clarified that the ordinance is strictly an ordinance regarding feeding of wildlife. The City will defer to IFG for what they choose to do with the wildlife.

Council Member Holmes expressed concern for the following three statements in the ordinance and gave her reasons:

#1 “WHEREAS, the intentional feeding of wildlife can alter natural behavior so far as to endanger public safety and require relocation or euthanasia of habituated animals”

Council Member Holmes feels that although this ordinance is primarily for prohibition of feeding wildlife, she wanted to be clear that she is totally against killing the deer. Police Chief Williams clarified that this language will not be in the ordinance as the draft presented was written in a resolution format which is not how an ordinance is written. He agreed that the City is not in the business of relocation and euthanasia of wildlife.

#2 5.7.400 B3 – Edible material located in a residence, closed vehicle, fully enclosed storage structure, or in an enclosed trash container, where the owner or person in charge has taken reasonable measures to restrict access by wildlife.

Council Member Holmes was also concerned about “the intent to lure” language of 5.7.400 B3 and Police Chief Williams clarified that this is specifically regarding hunting. Council Member Holmes wants that to be called out specifically, so it is clearer for the public. She would also like

MCCALL CITY COUNCIL Page 4 of 8 June 10, 2021 Regular Meeting

some language regarding overloading of trash cans written in with some enforcement piece, so it has teeth to deal with violators.

#3 5.7.400 B7 – Persons who are engaged in a lawful trapping activity allowing edible bait with all appropriate licenses and/or permits from Idaho Department of Fish and Game and according to both State of Idaho and City of McCall rules and regulations for such trapping activity; and activities that include lawful recreational trapping of wildlife and lawful trapping of nuisance wildlife by both the public and authorized agents of the State of Idaho, the City of McCall, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture Wildlife Services.

Council Member Holmes feels this section should be removed completely as it should be a separate conversation. City Attorney Bill Nichols stated that if this section gets removed this could create a political firestorm. Regan Berkley, representative of IFG, stated that the State does not have any regulation regarding trapping, and it is up to cities to make those regulations. Police Chief Williams clarified that this language is there to show that the City does not prohibit lawful fish and game activities that are following the State regulations and guidelines. Council Member Holmes asked that at what point would the City be involved in any trapping and relocation by IFG of which Ms. Berkley shared they would certainly involve the City in those conversations. Ms. Berkley addressed the louse issue and stated the issue in McCall is different from the issue in the City of Riggins as those deer were very infested and the deer in McCall are just beginning to show infestation. She stated that it is difficult to assess from afar, so IFG will have a veterinary on site to evaluate each deer that is captured to determine if there is a lice issue before transport.

Council Member Holmes stated she would like a 4th touch on this item as the Council has not seen the final ordinance yet and she does not want to make a hasty decision. City Attorney Nichols asked Ms. Berkley to clarify the migration patterns. Ms. Berkley explained how the winter feeding stops deer from naturally migrating to lower climes where there is food. City Attorney Nichols then shared he had asked that question of IFG to determine how much time was available before the adoption of the ordinance is required and for education. He stated there is plenty of time to get it right.

Council Member Nielsen wanted to know if there is any influence the City has on what operations FG will carry out. City Attorney Nichols asked for clarification of and spoke to what would happen to the deer if the ordinance was passed but not relocated. Ms. Berkley talked about the issues of what would happen if an ordinance were passed and IFG did not trap and relocate the deer. She stated that there is some food available, but it would quickly disappear with the snow and the deer would basically starve and die. She stated that the most humane and responsible thing to do is to trap and relocate them. Police Chief Williams reiterated the dilemma brought up by both the City Attorney and IFG is right on point, and he defers to the wildlife biologist experts to give guidance and make those decisions. He pointed out humans have created this problem of the deer being dependent for food. He feels it is important to work closely with IFG and be supportive to solve this problem.

MCCALL CITY COUNCIL Page 5 of 8 June 10, 2021 Regular Meeting

Mayor Giles gave a recap and reminded the Council this ordinance is specifically addressing wildlife feeding.

Council Member Nielsen asked for Ms. Berkley’s view of the success of the relocating of deer. She shared success would be trapping and relocating as many as possible with the hope that all trapped would be healthy enough to be relocated to the winter herd. She cannot offer a specific survival rate at this time. Council Member Nielsen also asked if trapping is legal in the City. Police Chief Williams stated that it is legal to trap but hunting is not. Mayor Giles asked to stick to the topic and not start on an off topic. Council Member Maciaszek agrees with staying on topic and appreciated Ms. Berkley’s explanation.

City Attorney Nichols asked for a definition of squirrels and Police Chief Williams stated all squirrels.

Council Member Callan agrees with item #3 in defining what is prohibited with the trash issues and has some qualms with the euthanasia but agrees with relocating. Police Chief Williams gave more explanation of what #3 is trying to accomplish and overflowing trash is covered in another part of the code. City Attorney Nichols stated it could be worded that an overflowing trash can, not properly covered by a lid, could be determined as not reasonable.

Mayor Giles summarized again and asked staff to finalize the draft ordinance for review/adoption at the next Council meeting. He asked that Police Chief Williams and Ms. Berkley be present for that presentation.

An audience member asked if wildlife is traumatized by the relocation. Ms. Berkley addressed the question by stating animal welfare is their top priority and they routinely trap and relocate animals and have been doing it for many years. The amount of trauma mostly depends on the animal.

AB 21-160 Request Approval of Resolution 21-22 to Surplus and Sell Personal Property – Taser X26 Tasers and accessories Police Chief Justin Williams presented Resolution 21-22 to surplus and sell department personal property – Taser X26 Tasers and accessories. Idaho Code §67-5732A allows the conveyance of surplus personal property to other state and local agencies. Annually City staff identifies several items as surplus property. He has determined that eight (8) Taser X26 Tasers and accessories are no longer of use to the City of McCall, and he would like to sell the X26 Tasers to Accredited Security and receive a credit up to $1,400.00. Staff has determined that it is in the best interest of the Police Department to sell the X26 to the nationally known distributor that possesses the equipment to repurpose rather than destroy them.

The Council did not have any questions of staff.

Council Member Callan moved to adopt Resolution 21-22 declaring the 8 X26 Tasers and accessories as surplus, authorizing the Police Chief to sell the 8 X26 Tasers and accessories to Accredited Security and sign the sales agreement, and authorize the mayor to sign the Resolution. Council Member Maciaszek seconded the motion. In a roll call vote Council

MCCALL CITY COUNCIL Page 6 of 8 June 10, 2021 Regular Meeting

Member Callan, Council Member Maciaszek, Mayor Giles, Council Member Holmes, and Council Member Nielsen all voted aye, and the motion carried.

AB 21-156 Application for the Idaho Airport Aid Program (IAAP) Airport Manager Rick Stein presented the application for the Idaho Airport Aid Program. The Idaho State Division of Aeronautics is currently accepting applications for the Idaho Airport Aid Program (IAAP). The IAAP will fund projects that did not receive a high National Priority Rating from the Federal Aviation Administration. Such projects may include snow removal equipment, buildings, fencing, and other hard to fund projects. The State has a recommended a funding request limit of $300,000 and plans on funding projects on a 90% State/10% local split. Final grant amounts and financing shares will be announced by the State as all grant applications are received and reviewed.

Staff has identified the need to purchase snow removal equipment due to the aging fleet that has succeeded the expected operational use/life cycle. The current snow blower unit is a 31-year-old Rolba 3,000 tons per hour (tph) blower. The Rolba has proven unreliable in the past few years with frequent breakdowns, requiring longer airport closures for snow removal. The new equipment would consist of a front-end loader mounted snow blower unit capable of at least 3000 tons per hour. Based upon similar equipment purchased at other airports, the expected cost is $280,000 - $260,000 in equipment purchases, and $20,000 for administrative costs (specifications, bid package, etc).

Council Member Holmes moved to approve the Application for the Idaho Airport Aid Program for new snow removal equipment and authorize the mayor to sign all necessary documents. Council Member Callan seconded the motion. In a roll call vote Council Member Holmes, Council Member Callan, Mayor Giles, Council Member Maciaszek, and Council Member Nielsen all voted aye, and the motion carried.

AB 21-158 Request to Adopt Resolution 21-23 Intent to Reimburse Authorized Reimbursable Expenditures from the Library Bond Fund City Manager Anette Spickard presented Resolution 21-23 Intent to reimburse authorized reimbursable expenditures from the Library Bond Fund. The McCall City Council adopted Ordinance No. 999 calling for a bond election for the Library Expansion Project on March 11, 2021. The bond election was held May 18, 2021, asking the voters of McCall whether the City should issue general obligation bonds of up to $4,200,000 for the library project. The required two- thirds (2/3) majority of the electors cast votes in favor of issuing the bonds. The City intends to incur and pay for reimbursable expenditures from the Library Bond Fund, and it is the City’s intent to be reimbursed for the expenditures from the bond proceeds. Adopting the resolution of Intent officially declares the City’s intention to be reimbursed for certain authorized expenditures. The resolution was prepared by bond counsel.

The Council did not have any questions of staff.

Council Member Maciaszek moved to adopt Resolution No. 21-23 Intent to Reimburse Authorized Reimbursable Expenditures from the Library Bond Fund and authorize the Mayor to sign all necessary documents. Council Member Holmes seconded the motion. In a

MCCALL CITY COUNCIL Page 7 of 8 June 10, 2021 Regular Meeting

roll call vote Council Member Maciaszek, Council Member Holmes, Mayor Giles, Council Member Callan, and Council Member Nielsen all voted aye, and the motion carried.

Covid-19 Update and Review of Mask Metrics Status Police Chief Justin Williams presented the Covid-19 update. He reported that the county is still below average and 3 of the 4 metrics are being met. City Manager Anette Spickard gave an update on the focus of the Covid-19 regional taskforce is now focused on education regarding vaccinations and there is a mobile vaccine vehicle going around to different communities.

Upcoming Meetings Schedule Discussion Council discussed upcoming meetings. Council Member Nielsen would like an update from the Housing Advisory Committee.

ADJOURNMENT

Without further business, Mayor Giles adjourned the meeting at 6:52 p.m.

ATTEST: Robert S. Giles, Mayor

BessieJo Wagner, City Clerk

MCCALL CITY COUNCIL Page 8 of 8 June 10, 2021 Regular Meeting ATTACHMENT 1 06/09/21 COMMENTS RELATED TO FEEDING WILDLIFE ORDINANCE

1 6/3/21 18:10:26 David Simmonds 506 Sunset St, PO Box 287, McCall ID 83638 For

Please prohibit feeding of deer, and work with IDFG to reduce the herds drastically. Overpopulation of deer in our part of town is a serious menace and has had a major financial cost for us. This spring, a deer being chased by a loose dog in the neighborhood darted out of a side street, struck my stopped vehicle at a full run and caused significant damage. In recent years as deer herds in town have increased, we have spent hundreds of dollars on deer repellent to save our trees, shrubs and gardens. But it's always temporary and seems they will soon eat almost everything they can reach, including "deer hardy" plants. Two weeks ago in frustration I spent almost $400 on 7 foot deer netting. Prior to that, we watched deer easily jump over a 5' wire fence around our vegetable garden. Our yard now has some protection but feels and looks a bit like a prison. This has to end. Thank you.

2 6/3/21 20:36:09 Faye Thompson 13828 Shadow Ridge, McCall Against

Leave the deer where they are. Increase education about not feeding. Signs about it in areas where it is known they are being fed. Generations of deer are in town. It is an endearing feature here and should be left alone. The mountain lion has been around for many years.

3 6/4/21 12:50:44 Roger gossi 1200 Aspen ridge ln For

Deer have been a problem for years. Feeding them isn’t good for deer or McCall. Tourist love to see them like we do but they need to become wild again. Same for all the furry creatures. Birds are just fine. Thanks and have been a resident off and on since 1957.

4 6/7/21 9:08:46 Karen Bouch 704 Reedy Lane, McCall Idaho For

Please vote in support of this proposed ordinance. We support McCall Police Dept. and local Fish and Game in the need to curb the cities deer population. We know first had the destruction of personal property that is being done. Please drive by and take a look. The City of McCall, should look to other resort communities in the state. It is one of the only in the state NOT to have an Nuicance ordinance for feeding of wildlife in city limits. Thank you

5 6/7/21 15:07:15 Karen Hornfelt 4014 Fairway Drive Lewiston ID 83501 Against

"Just read an article in the Lewiston Tribune that the mayor and city council are discussing the moving of the ""town"" mule deer. The wildlife is one of the reasons why we love visiting McCall every year in the spring and fall. McCall is a mountain town, not an urban city. Do your part in helping to maintain this mountain town and it's four legged inhabitants. Educate people on how not to feed the elk and deer; how not to leave garbage cans open for the bears, fox and raccoons; how not to leave dog and cat food on porches. People choose to move to McCall because of it's beauty and natural setting. It's not the fault of the animals, it's human err. Wildlife have lived there long before humans. If people want to change the beauty of this mountain town, then they probably should just stay in the city. McCall is not an urban city. Do not stress-out and move these deer. The McCall wilderness is their home. Not everyone goes to McCall to eat, drink and be merry. Many go for the serenity and to be with nature.

Thank you for your time. "

Page 1 of 3 06/09/21 COMMENTS RELATED TO FEEDING WILDLIFE ORDINANCE

6 6/7/21 17:14:31 Sharon Tucker 1022 Evergreen Dr., McCall, ID 83638 For

I’ve seen an adult teaching small children to feed deer from the palm of their hands while the buck is rearing to get to the food! Crazy!!

7 6/8/21 12:37:31 Colleen Bright Ross PO Box 510, McCall, ID Against

"Dear Council Members, The proposals to move or cull our ""town deer"" makes me very sad. It is a cruel ""solution"" to a falsely-framed ""problem.""

Long before McCall existed as a town, the deer were here. So were the predators (cougar and wolves, even no doubt). Then, we built our town. The problem is not the town deer, but the town itself. There is no evidence that I am aware of that our mule deer migrated to lower elevations in the winter. It's a tricky, almost impossible journey from our valley floor to Riggins, Council or the lowest reaches of the North Fork of the Payette River. In all likelihood, our town deer wintered over on our very own valley floor.

And what have we done to their wintering grounds: built houses, roads and fences everywhere. This has limited their food supply, made it very difficult for them to move around the valley floor so they can browse and feed without getting caught up in fences, hit by cars or worse. The impulse to feed deer is not a widespread issue: a few people in town feed some of the deer a few months in the depths of winter, when forage is limited or non-existent. There would be much more food for the deer during winter if we hadn't built houses and roads everywhere?! If it is ok to feed songbirds (another population in decline due to human activity), why not deer, we should be asking ourselves?

Instead of culling the town deer, we should try to live together more peacefully with them: instead of driving 35 mph on roads posted 20 mph, follow the speed limits. Whether to avoid humans, pets or deer, people should SLOW down while driving in town. The city could and should post more signs reminding motorists that there are pets, wildlife and humans on or next to roadways? Maybe some signs that just say ""watch out for humans and wildlife""?! As for the damage to gardens, and we all love our gardens, people might try putting out deer repellant or deer resistant plants? Cayenne, commercially available repellant sprays, and fences (where permitted) all work very well for keeping deer out of gardens. Become a better, more ""mountain savvy"" gardener.

As for the burden on the police department, we have seen plenty of house pets and occasionally bicyclists hit by cars, as well. Do we want to ban them?

And then there is the alleged lice/mite/ skin infestation problem: those do exist in town, but they also exist outside town. Lice infestations are not unique to the town deer: they happen to all ""herding"" deer populations. The reason lice, skin and wasting disease spreads in deer populations is precisely because they are herd animals, not because the herd lives in town. The Department of Fish and Game ought to be thinking broadly about making our deer, elk and other browsing herds more healthy everywhere, not just killing town deer to appease a small segment of town dwellers unhappy because they can't leave their gardens unattended at their second homes.

Let's try and have some concern for all of god's creatures, not just ourselves?"

Page 2 of 3

06/09/21 COMMENTS RELATED TO FEEDING WILDLIFE ORDINANCE

8 6/8/21 18:44:19 Eddie and Danielle Gray 705 Reedy lane Against

We are against transporting or killing town deer, deer do what deer do, and they have been here far longer than we have.

9 6/9/21 6:31:58 Dean Gard 1600 Lawrence Dr. McCall, ID 83638 Against

I oppose the plan to transport or kill any of the town deer.

10 6/9/21 15:28:49 Debra Staup [email protected] Against

I am against rushing this through. I feel enough research hasn't been done. Please refer to the email letter I sent to each council member and to the City Manager. In my letter, I shared the results of some of my research and what other places have done. I believe we need to slow down and consider better options. Eradicating the deer either by trapping and relocating them or killing them is costly and has proven unsuccessful and even inhumane to the deer. Our deer should not be punished for what is a human caused problem. The deer and all our wildlife were here first. We need to look at and implement better options. Again, please refer to my letter and hopefully we can be proactive instead reactive. Thank you.

Page 3 of 3

06/10/21 COMMENTS RELATED TO FEEDING WILDLIFE ORDINANCE

11 6/9/21 19:47:57 Daniel O'Malley 1535 McCall Avenue Against

"Dan O'Malley

The city wants to ban the feeding of all wildlife within city limits, with the exception of wild bird feeding. The local deer can sometimes be a problem due to being fed and eating from people's yards and gardens. However, I first visited McCall back in 1999, and have lived here since 2002, and there have always been large numbers of deer within city limits. Why is the city just now choosing to try to resolve a problem that has existed for decades? What is their reasoning behind only allowing wild birds to be fed? If they are going to ban feeding wildlife in city limits, they shouldn't do a half assed job of it, and should ban the feeding of birds as well. I used to feed the birds all the time, but have not done so for several years. This is because of the huge problems wild bird feeding can cause. It not only attracts birds, but it also attracts squirrels, skunks, raccoons, deer, and bears. Will the city propose to eradicate all the wildlife in the future because they sometimes pose problems? How is the city going to enforce the feeding ban when the bird feed attracts wildlife other than birds? Is the city going to enforce/cite people for attracting and feeding bird food to other wildlife, even if it was not intentional? Do any of the F&G people, police, mayor, or city council members feed the birds, and are not including feeding them in the ban for their own purposes? I am not trying to be funny with the photos. They show the aftermath of what can happen when a bear rips down a handmade bird feeder, then climbs a 6 foot fence and tears down two more feeders hung 12 feet up a tree, which attracted even more wildlife."

12 6/9/21 19:52:19 Daniel O'Malley 1535 McCall Avenue Against Continued

"I was once known as the ""Mad McCall Bomber"". I designed, built, and experimented with homemade explosives, until I was arrested on 09/02/2011. When I was released on 12/08/2011, I swore to myself that I would never go back down that long dark roadway, towards self destruction. Instead, I took up the camera that I used to express myself many years prior. My subjects were the urban wild animals that lived around me, and that I loved photographing.

Unfortunately, back in 2015, I was lied to by Dallas Palmer of the McCall Police Department. He specifically told me that feeding wild animals within city limits was illegal. He emphasized that if I continued to do so, that I would be cited and my probation violated so that I would end up back in jail. He suggested at that time that if I had questions, I should contact Idaho Fish & Game for verification. I did exactly that the next day, and was told that there were no (zero) regulations/ordinances prohibiting the feeding of urban wildlife in the McCall area. I stopped feeding any wildlife at that point, even though I read the entire McCall Civil Code, and also found no mention of the illegality of feeding wildlife within city limits.

I was quite pissed off due to being lied to directly by a member of our local police department, and when my Probation Officer, Mike Truxel, told me he would not enforce a probation violation (I had him verify my findings with Idaho F&G and McCall City Code), I knew then and there that Dallas was lying about what he told me. Less than two weeks later, former McCall Police Detective Brian Koch stopped by my house to tell me that he would issue me a citation if I ever fed the wildlife again. He specifically told me that it was in ""the books"" written that it was illegal to feed wildlife, and if I couldn't find where that fact was documented, that ""that's your own fault"".

Page 1 of 6

06/10/21 COMMENTS RELATED TO FEEDING WILDLIFE ORDINANCE

Just a factual account since April of 2017: I have had several foxes show up at my house in McCall showing signs of mange. I did a lot of research on how to possibly treat these foxes for their mange conditions. I decided to treat these foxes myself for their mange. I ordered medication online, and carefully followed the directions I found online. (http://www.foxwoodwildliferescue.org/2017/01/05/treating-sarcoptic-mange-in-red-foxes/), and through the fox welfare site in England (National Fox Welfare Society). Since 2017, I have been able to successfully treat 9 of 11 foxes that presented themselves to me with varying degrees of mange infestation. If you ban/prohibit the feeding of wildlife within the city of McCall, you will essentially condemn any fox afflicted with mange to a long, unnecessary, and extremely painful death due to mange. Don't tell me that there are other options available, because our local ""animal welfare"" rehabilitation center (Snowdon) is a joke at best. I have contacted them 6 times to come and assist/help afflicted/injured animals, and they have never once helped at all. It also seems that the only help Id F&G want to provide is a quick bullet to the brain for any wild animal they are called out for."

13 6/10/21 7:45:20 Simon Ingham 1658 Timber Circle McCall ID 83638 For

Great idea - I highly approve

14 6/10/21 10:48:30 Marilyn Olson P.O. Box 455 (890 Timber Ridge Ct.), McCall, ID, 83638 For

I support an ordinance to prohibit feeding of deer (and other wild animals) in the town of McCall. I have lived in McCall for over 40 years and understand that we have lost a lot of deer habitat due to the increase in buildings and development. Riggins had a deer problem and culled their deer herd and were able to feed several low income families. Transplanting deer seems a bad choice, as 50% mortality occurs with excessive cost. Thank you for your time and consideration.

15 6/10/21 11:03:20 Debra and Jim Staup P.O. Box 1221 Against

I entered a comment earlier, but Jim and I both felt we needed to strongly clarify we are against the killing and/or trapping and relocating of our town deer. Please refer to my email sent yesterday to all Council Members and to the City Manager. In it are better and more humane options suggested by wildlife experts in other areas/states. We expect the Council to slow down, gather more complete and balanced information, and to look at this matter very carefully before making a decision that could cause unnecessary harm. The deer should not be punished for a human caused problem. Thank you, Debra and Jim Staup

16 6/10/21 11:56:26 Cherise White 1324 Eagle Dr McCall, Idaho 83638 Against Strongly oppose

17 6/10/21 12:01:20 pat collins 1324 eagle dr mccall idaho 83638 Against

I am against the removal of the deer from our community, but would like to see people being educated about not feed the wild animals.

18 6/10/21 12:17:17 Jamie Melbo 506 Sunset St McCall, ID For

I urge you to adopt this ordinance prohibiting the feeding of wildlife as described in the draft. Wild animals should be respected, observed from a distance, and left alone. Thank you.

Page 2 of 6

06/10/21 COMMENTS RELATED TO FEEDING WILDLIFE ORDINANCE

19 6/10/21 12:43:27 Dale Allen 914 Chipmunk Lane For "Please add the following Whereas or similiar; Intentional feeding of wildlife causes unnatural aggregations during environmentally stressful times and can led to outbreaks of diseases.

I live near Davis and Lick Creek Rd. We are over run with deer in the late summer and fall. We can no longer have any outdoor flowers or plants on our back patio, because deer will mow them down. all foundation plantings around the house have been destroyed. I have easily up to ten deer in my backyard, on my porch and even laying on the concrete floor of the garage. This is all because of winter feeding activities of several individuals on Davis Ave.

This ord. is a necessary start but it will be meaningless unless enforced. Also the City must be active in assisting the removal of these deer during early winter when they really gather. This will require resources to clear snow for trapping, providing City properties for trapping and perhaps manpower. This also will likely take several years to be come effective.

These town deer will not migrate normally, its been too many generations of staying in town during the winter instead of migrating. If feeding is successfully curtailed the deer's condition will be much reduced, even more damage to citizens landscape plantings will likely occur and there could well be much more deer mortality. thank you"

20 6/10/21 13:25:23 Joe Luff 414 Floyde St. McCall, ID 83638 For

This should have been implemented years ago.

21 6/10/21 14:09:50 Mark Dooley 258 Ernesto Against

"I know this is a complicated and emotional issues. I would like to remind everyone that people are the ones who moved into the wild lives habitat. We dug and removed their food sources. We eliminated their natural migration routes and now we deem them the problem. I don’t agree with this.

Trapping and relocating deer is an exercise is futility and a waste of money. Where do you draw the line for trapping? City limits? Area of impact limits? County limits? What’s to stop the deer on the edge of that limit line to not come over. We learned from the failed wolf introduction decades ago that the wolf doesn’t know to stay where he was put.

In regards to a comment in the paper about a majority of the people are feeding deer inappropriate food. I would like a copy of that report. No one polled me to see if I feed the deer. No one asked me what I fed them if I did feed the deer.

History proves the deer and elk winter in Donnelly, McCall and New Meadows. The Finnish settlers settled in Donnelly in the winter because the deer and elk where there. New Pearce tribe used the Zims hot springs area because of the hot springs, fish, deer and elk.

If Fish and Game is going to address feeding they need to address the big picture. Elk in Donnelly are manipulated and moved by the ranchers that provides the sleigh rides. They have moved that wintering herd from the trees to the fields adjacent 55 by feeding them. Someone will die when hitting an elk on 55 due to their direct efforts to market their business. No one will die hitting a deer at 25mph in front of Albertsons.

Page 3 of 6

06/10/21 COMMENTS RELATED TO FEEDING WILDLIFE ORDINANCE

I would argue Lardos is feeding the bears with the uncontrolled vent hoods spewing grease onto carpets and causing the direct dependency of the bears to live in the Rio Vista sub. Aggressive bears are dangerous.

What will constitute feeding? I feed the birds. Seed falls on the ground and the deer eats the seeds. Do I get a fine? I plant flowers and grow tomatoes. Deer eat those, do I get a fine. I would rather our law enforcement officers enforce the no alcohol ban on the beach during the fourth then write tickets for feeding the bears.

A major draw and big part of our quality of life is nature. Our past mayors, city councils and planning and zoning commissioners failed our community by not requiring developers to provide environmental clearance and preservation of migratory routes for wildlife. As a consultant in Boise I did this on every community development I worked on. It’s even required in downtown Bellevue, WA but not McCall. The Cities past short comings managing development should not be passed to the current citizens and the wildlife that are directly affected by those decisions.

Thank You

Mark Dooley 208-573-4627"

22 6/10/21 14:14:49 Debra and Jim Staup P.O. Box 1221 McCall, Idaho 83638 Against "On May 27, 2021, Council directed staff to continue with preparation of a proposed ordinance prohibiting the feeding of wildlife within the City of McCall." This is quite concerning.. Does the Council want to ban everyone from feeding 'all' wildlife such as birds, humming birds, etc. The language is ambiguous and will cause a firestorm of problems. Clarification is needed. Again, the Council needs to slow down and rethink what is the real objective here. Reactive thinking will not provide a solution to the problem.

23 6/10/21 14:00:54 Julie Conrad 1423 Eagle Drive P.O. Box 2755 McCall, ID 83638 Against

"Dear City Council, First let me clarify my ""against"" response.

Since this ""matter"" came up only in the last week, and since it is not ultimately clear as to what this ""Wildlife Ordinance"" fully entails, here is my clarification statement:

1. I have no problem with there being an ordinance put in place by the City to make it illegal to feed deer and other wildlife within the City limits of McCall. I think that is a good and necessary first step. Therefore, I am in agreement or ""for"" that matter ONLY.

2. What I am FULLY AGAINST however, are the other issue(s) being talked about in the same breath by Regan Berkley, Regional Wildlife Manager with Fish and Game and by local Police Chief Justin Williams to catch/transport/ or euthanize the town deer. Particularly concerning is Ms. Berkley's quote in last weeks Star News: ""There is no effective way to rid the deer of the lice, so infected deer would be humanely killed by Fish and Game to avoid spreading the infestation, she said"".

3. It is very unclear as to which issue we are supposedly making our stance on. JUST the proposed ordinance to make it illegal to feed the deer? OR, several other ordinances regarding trapping, transporting, euthanizing all of the town deer? In speaking with a multitude of friends and

Page 4 of 6

06/10/21 COMMENTS RELATED TO FEEDING WILDLIFE ORDINANCE acquaintances this week who live here full time, NOT ONE OF THEM KNEW OF THIS PROPOSED ORDINANCE OR THE TALK OF TRAPPING, TRANSPORTING, EUTHANIZING THE TOWN DEER. That is Extremely concerning to me.

***Regarding deer lice: Multiple studies show that lice in deer are not uncommon. These same studies also show that the lice are NOT harmful to humans nor domestic pets, and that the lice rarely kill the deer themselves.

""The exotic lice species described above does not affect humans or domestic animals. Deer in captive settings have been successfully cleared of lice infestations with the use of medication.....Medications exist to treat most conditions causing hair loss in deer... Many cases resolve on their own when the deer are in better condition in spring/summer due to increased food resources or with seasonal environmental changes."""" ~Washington Department of Fish and Game~

***Regarding the issues of ""traffic hazards"": IF the speed limit in the City of McCall was routinely enforced (20mph and 25mph), and the distracted driving issue was enforced, I think we would find that there would be few car/deer collisions. I spoke by phone this week with the WA State Fish and Game Wildlife Officer, and he stated that ""even at 25mph, most deer survive the collision and do not need to be euthanized"".

***Regarding the attraction of predators: I have been coming to McCall since the early 1960's (summers, winters, weekends, holidays) and have enjoyed McCall with my family at our two cabins (the first in Wagon Wheel Bay off of Warren Wagon Road from 1967 through 1994, and the second in Shady Cove/Pilgrim Cove off of Lick Creek Road from 1994 to 2012. I have been a full time resident of McCall since 2012 and live on the McCall Golf Course.

I have never once seen a mountain lion or wolf. I have only seen a coyote in town ONCE (on the golf course) in the past 55+ years. I realize there are ""sightings"" on occasion. Primarily from juvenile mountain lions without a mother, or perhaps a sick/injured lion. The City of Boise has many more sightings than McCall.

These are fleeting, and in 55+ years I don't believe there are ""increased"" sightings, but rather an increase in reporting of sightings. Again, these are very rare. I am unaware of ANY documented killings of deer within our City Limits in 55+ years.

***Regarding the ""nuisance"" issue: We live in a beautiful Mountain Resort town where deer have been prevalent for decades and longer. We have taken over their habitat. We have paved over their migration routes and built subdivisions, buildings, parking lots, businesses ON their habitat. Since space is an issue, I will continue with this statement in a 2nd submittal)"

24 6/10/21 14:44:57 Julie Conrad 1423 Eagle Drive PO Box 2755 McCall ID 83638 Against

"Please see first submittal to this page as of 2:44pm June 10th, 2021.

This is the continuation of that statement:

******Regarding the ""nuisance"" issue: We live in a beautiful Mountain Resort town where deer have been prevalent for decades and longer. We have taken over their habitat. We have paved over their migration routes and built subdivisions, buildings, parking lots, businesses ON their habitat. I have

Page 5 of 6

06/10/21 COMMENTS RELATED TO FEEDING WILDLIFE ORDINANCE serious doubts that these town deer have migrated to lower elevations, but would certainly welcome that information. Were the town deer tagged and monitored in the past? Did our town deer simply move to areas outside of our core such as Spring Mountain Ranch? The Woodlands? Lick Creek Meadows during the Winter months and remain unseen. But now that those locations are all paved over with houses, the deer have no other choice but to be ""seen"" in town?

It is a blessing and privilege to live amongst the deer and other wildlife here in McCall. It is a primary reason I moved here from Boise.

I spent this week talking to Fish and Game Wildlife Officers and Biologists from the States of Washington, Oregon, Utah and Idaho. Our neighboring states have excellent websites and resources to educate the public on ""LIVING WITH WILDLIFE"". Not the ""transport and euthanizing of wildlife"".

It was refreshing to hear of and read their education pieces.

I am curious what percentage of those complaining to the City of McCall/F & G/The Police Department are complaining about the deer ""eating their gardens, flowers, trees, shrubs""?

Why are we accommodating their statements when there are ways to mitigate the deer coming on their property and/or eating their gardens?

There are plenty of educational pieces out there. No need to recreate the wheel.

****Finally, I believe that the City has much bigger fish to fry right now:

1. Housing

2. Infrastructure

3. Safe biking paths and sidewalks

4. Making roadways safer

5. Speeding locals and Tourists and Distracted Drivers

6. The huge illegal drug problem Within Our City.

Many of the above will harm or kill far more humans than any town deer will.

I hope you will not make a knee-jerk reaction to a ""non-issue"" that we can never recover from . Just one cursory look at the history of the wolf in Idaho should tell you that (eradicate to extinction; re- introduce; and now eradicate to 90%+ extinction). This is a very dangerous situation of trying to ""Play God"". I hope our City officials take a BIG step back before it's far to late.

Thank you

Julie Conrad"

Page 6 of 6

BLANK PAGE

MINUTES

McCall City Council Regular Meeting McCall City Hall -- Legion Hall VIA TEAMS Virtual June 24, 2021

Call to Order and Roll Call Pledge of Allegiance Approve the Agenda Consent Agenda Public Comment Work Session Business Agenda Adjournment

CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL

Mayor Giles called the regular meeting of the McCall City Council to order at 5:00 p.m. Mayor Giles, Council Member Callan, Council Member Holmes, Council Member Maciaszek, and Council Member Nielsen all answered roll call.

City staff members present were Anette Spickard, City Manager; Bill Nichols, City Attorney; BessieJo Wagner, City Clerk; Erin Greaves, Communications Manager; Linda Stokes, City Treasurer; Michelle Groenevelt, Community Development Director; Delta James, Economic Development Planner; Brian Parker, City Planner; Eric McCormick, Golf Course Superintendent; Meg Lojek, Library Director; Chris Curtin, Information Systems Manager; Justin Williams, Police Chief; Vlatko Jovanov, Network Administrator; Tara Woods, Recreation Supervisor;

Also, in attendance were Regan Berkley, Idaho Fish & Game and Dave Holland, Heartland Hunger and Resource Center

Mayor Giles led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance.

APPROVE THE AGENDA

Council Member Nielsen moved to approve the agenda as submitted. Council Member Maciaszek seconded the motion. In a voice vote all members voted aye, and the motion carried.

MCCALL CITY COUNCIL Page 1 of 9 June 24, 2021 Regular Meeting

CONSENT AGENDA

Staff recommended approval of the following ACTION ITEMS. All matters which are listed within the consent section of the agenda have been distributed to each member of the McCall City Council for reading and study. Items listed are considered routine by the Council and were enacted with one motion. 1. Payroll Report for period ending June 11, 2021 2. Warrant Register – GL 3. Warrant Register – Vendor 4. AB 21-166 City Licenses Report to Council Per McCall City Code: Per McCall City Code Title 4 Chapter 9, the City Council has determined the City Clerk shall be delegated the authority to process and grant or deny all alcoholic beverage license applications, other than certain circumstances involving catering permits, which the City Clerk shall review the application for catering permit for completeness and forward said application to the Police Chief. The Police Chief upon receipt of the application shall make a recommendation to the City Clerk to approve or deny the application. Whenever the City Clerk shall determine that an application for alcoholic beverage license transfer or renewal is complete, the City Clerk shall approve or deny such application. All decisions of the City Clerk shall be reported to the City Council at the next regularly scheduled City Council meeting after such decision. The City Clerk is also responsible for all processing of business, taxi, snow removal, pawnbroker, child daycare licenses, vendor permits, and public event applications. Action: Council to review the License report. 5. AB 21-167 Treasurer’s Report as Required by IC 50-208: Treasurer’s report of accounts and activity of office during the month of May 2021 regarding care, management or disposition of moneys, property, or business of the City. Action: The Council shall examine the report and determine whether additional information from the Treasurer is required. 6. AB 21-165 McCall Youth Football Club and Parks & Recreation MOU: McCall Youth Football Club (MYFC) is a youth sports organization that has replaced the Optimist Football Program and offers full-contact football coaching and games for local youth. The club has nonprofit status and needs program registration assistance. The MYFC approached the City of McCall Parks and Recreation Department, about partnering with the club to help advertise, collect program registrations and monies. The program was a success for the past two years, and they would like to partner again for the 2021 fall season. The Parks and Recreation Department utilizes Team Sideline for their program registration, advertising, and participant database software. The MYFC has set the program registration fee and will be responsible for purchasing and maintaining safe equipment for the football program and provide their own liability insurance. The Parks and Recreation Department will advertise for the program, collect registration fees, and disperse funds to the MYFC. The department will collect 10% of the total registration fees to cover our expenses. McCall Recreation Youth Scholarships will not be used for the football program. Those needing financial assistance for the program can contact the football club directly to request support. Action: Approve the MOU with the McCall Youth Football Club and approve the mayor to sign all necessary documentation. 7. AB 21-170 Request to Approve a New Lease for Hangar 523 with Richard A. Bush and Pamela S. Bush and Terminate the existing 523 Lease with SEICO, LLC: Richard A. Bush and Pamela S. Bush are purchasing Hangar 523 from SEICO, LLC and are requesting a new

MCCALL CITY COUNCIL Page 2 of 9 June 24, 2021 Regular Meeting

lease for Hangar 523 and to terminate the existing lease with Bruce A. & Sylvia J. Hafenfeld. The existing lease consists of 1,530 square feet of property. The current annual Hangar Lease payment of $586.93 is paid up through September 30, 2021. The new rate will be $0.3127 per sq ft, or $478.43 a decrease of $108.50 - and increases the lease term from the original 15 years remaining to 40 years. The purchaser has been provided with a copy of the current lease, current Airport Rules and Regulations, and Airport Minimum Standards. The City Clerk will record the document and keep a copy for the City’s records. Staff has requested a $200 transaction fee. The contract has been reviewed by the City Attorney. Action: Approve a New Lease for Hangar 523 with Richard A. Bush and Pamela S. Bush, terminate the existing Hangar 523 Lease with Bruce A. & Sylvia J. Hafenfeld, and authorize the mayor to sign all necessary documents.

Council Member Callan moved to approve the Consent Agenda as submitted. Council Member Holmes seconded the motion. In a roll call vote Council Member Callan, Council Member Holmes, Mayor Giles, Council Member Maciaszek, and Council Member Nielsen all voted aye, and the motion carried.

PUBLIC COMMENT

Mayor Giles called for public comment at 5:32 p.m.

City Clerk BessieJo Wagner gave a summary of the written comments: Wildlife Ordinance There were approximately 353 people who sent written comments, of those comments only 127 were from people with a McCall address – showing 18 in favor of the ordinance, 2 neutral and 107 against. Many of those against expressed they were mostly against the removal, relocation, or euthanasia of the Deer and some were in favor of prohibiting the feeding of wildlife. There were 8 from an unknown location - stating 1 for, 1 neutral, and 6 against. There were 218 comments from people that do not have a McCall address, some of which do not even live in Idaho or this country. These comments were against removal, relocation, or euthanasia of the deer. This brings the total number in favor to 19, neutral 3, and against 331. All the comments will follow the minutes as Attachment 1.

Resolution 21-25 Area of Concern All 44 written comments received were in favor of the resolution being presented later in the meeting and will follow the minutes as Attachment 2.

In Person Comments Lew and Colleen Ross of 915 Camas Drive, McCall shared they are in opposition of the Wildlife Feeding Ordinance and spoke to aggressive driving and actions towards the deer. They would rather see other actions taken to deal with the wildlife.

Julie Conrad of 1423 Eagle Drive, McCall spoke in opposition of the Wildlife Feeding Ordinance. She would rather see education over eradication.

MCCALL CITY COUNCIL Page 3 of 9 June 24, 2021 Regular Meeting

Marcia Witte of 669 Woodlands Drive, McCall spoke in favor of Resolution 21-25 – Area of Concern. She shared her concerns about what the Pine Creek Ranch development will have on infrastructure and safety issues on Woodlands Drive.

Sheree Sonfield 664 Woodlands Drive, McCall spoke in favor of Resolution 21-25 - Area of Concern and shared concerns about the environmental assessment and asked that the Council require that the assessment specifically considers all the potential options for vehicular traffic. She shared comparisons to another large development and how this development falls short in providing access and pathways.

Thaddeus of 602 Woodlands Drive, McCall spoke in favor of adopting Resolution 21-25 - Area of Concern. He asked that an environmental assessment addressing many issues is completed prior to approval.

Hearing no further comments, Mayor Giles closed the comment period at 5:56 p.m.

The Council took a brief recess and reconvened at 5:58 p.m.

WORK SESSION

AB-168 Request for Council to Review a Draft Ordinance Regarding Prohibiting the Feeding of Wildlife Police Chief Justin Williams presented the draft ordinance regarding prohibiting the feeding of wildlife. On May 27, 2021, Council directed staff to continue with preparation of a proposed ordinance prohibiting the feeding of wildlife within the City of McCall. On June 10, 2021, in cooperation with Idaho Fish and Game, staff presented some ordinance language for review and discussion. Council gave some suggestions and some desired changes and requested that staff bring back code language in ordinance form for them to review

Regan Berkley, Idaho Fish & Game (IFG), clarified information on the relocation of the deer and gave an explanation on what education pieces have been distributed. She shared that the mortality of the deer is much higher with them in place than it would be if they were relocated. Unnatural feeding of the deer has changed the natural migration patterns of this deer herd and it is the goal of IFG to reestablish the winter migration. This does not mean there will not be any deer as they will migrate back during the summer months. She agrees with education over regulation and stated IFG has spent much time and money in educating the community already.

Police Chief Williams referenced the comments about speeding and the installation of signs and stated that as it is with dealing with people breaking the law by speeding that without an enforcement aspect, education by itself will not be a deterrent which is why the ordinance is being presented.

Mayor Giles called for Council discussion about the ordinance. Council Member Maciaszek stated he is good with what is presented in the ordinance. Council Member Nielsen supports the ordinance except for item B7 under 5.7.400 Feeding/Attracting Wildlife Prohibition. Council Member

MCCALL CITY COUNCIL Page 4 of 9 June 24, 2021 Regular Meeting

Holmes feels that it should be tabled. Council Member Callan stated she is good with what is written.

Mayor Giles asked for clarification on surrounding states regarding wildlife feeding as well as some Idaho cities and national parks. Police Chief Williams clarified there is prohibition in those areas and Ms. Berkley stated she did not believe the town of Riggins has a feeding ordinance. City Attorney Bill Nichols clarified that the banning of trapping is a separate issue and to not confuse feeding with trapping. He advised against mixing the two together.

Council Member Nielsen asked if IFG would commence the relocation anyway if the ordinance did not pass and Ms. Berkley stated that it is too costly of an endeavor to do if there was no feeding ordinance in place to support keeping this from happening again. Council Member Nielsen asked if the ordinance did pass, is it possible to not relocate the deer and Ms. Berkley reiterated that it would not be humane to allow the deer to stay as they are reliant on humans feeding them during the winter months so they would starve. Council Member Nielsen asked if there is an option to not relocate. Police Chief Williams stated that the Council could ask IFG to not relocate but IFG is ultimately the one responsible for game management and will need to do what they feel is best after they study the herd further. Mayor Giles did feel he should vote for the ordinance if they do not support IFG. Council Member Maciaszek is not going to question what IFG does as they are the experts on wild animals. He supports the restriction of the feeding of wild animals. Council Member Callan stated she was in total agreement. Council Member Holmes stated she felt the Council should listen to the public and was not in support. She does not agree with IFG. The Council briefly discussed the issue further. The Council consensus was to finalize the ordinance at the next meeting.

BUSINESS AGENDA

AB 21-164 Request to Approve the Woodstock Agreement with Heartland Hunger & Resource Center and Proclaim the 10th day of July 2021 as Humanitarian Woodwork Day Dave Holland in conjunction with the Heartland Hunger and Resource Center, has worked with churches and other community organizations to create a humanitarian project of obtaining firewood for those in need. The three groups of individuals designated for assistance are 1) widows and single women with children; 2) the aged and infirmed, and 3) those injured and not capable of getting wood themselves.

Mr. Holland is requesting that the City declare, by proclamation, the second Saturday in July of each year as the “Humanitarian Wood Work Day”. This year that day is July 10, 2021. In prior years, over 200 volunteers participated in cutting, splitting, and delivering hundreds of cords of wood. Since the first Woodwork Day over 1000 cords of firewood have been delivered to over 230 families in need.

The plan is to start at 8:00 a.m. on Saturday, July 10, 2021. No one under the age of 18 will be permitted to use a chainsaw. The primary sawyers will be volunteers from the Forest Service Firefighters. The goal is to have the wood cut into rounds the week prior to reduce the need for additional sawyers. Also, volunteering is the McCall Fire District who is providing EMT services

MCCALL CITY COUNCIL Page 5 of 9 June 24, 2021 Regular Meeting

for the activities. Enough wood has already been purchased and is in McCall ready for this year’s event.

Council Member Callan moved to approve the Woodstock Agreement with Heartland Hunger & Resource Center and Proclaim the 10th day of July 2021 to be Humanitarian Woodwork Day in the City of McCall and authorize the Mayor to sign all necessary documents. Council Member Nielsen seconded the motion. In a roll call vote Council Member Callan, Council Member Nielsen, Mayor Giles, Council Member Holmes, and Council Member Maciaszek all voted aye, and the motion carried.

AB 21-169 Request to Approve National Endowment for the Arts Grants for Arts Project application for McCall Library public art Economic Development Planner Delta James presented the National Endowment for the Arts Grants for Arts Project application for McCall Library public art. The National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) offers matching funding through its Grants for Arts Projects program to support projects that “celebrate America’s creativity and/or cultural heritage.” The average grant award amount is $25,000 and must be matched at least 1:1 with local funding.

The McCall Public Art Advisory Committee is requesting approval to apply to this grant program to help fund a public artwork that will be integrated into the Library Expansion project and provide a critical component of the new Library construction such as front desk, interior doorway, flooring, furnishings, or fireplace mantel in a unique and beautiful way. Funds necessary to match this grant, if awarded, are pending FY22 City budget approval. An FY22 CIP request of $62,000 has been submitted for this project for a total project cost estimate of $87,000. This project was identified as a priority project within the McCall Public Art Plan adopted by City Council on March 11, 2021. Additionally, at its June 14, 2021, meeting, the McCall Library Board expressed support for this project.

The Council did not have any questions.

Council Member Maciaszek moved to approve submittal of a NEA grant application for McCall Library public art and authorize the Mayor to sign all necessary documents. Council Member Callan seconded the motion. In a roll call vote Council Member Maciaszek, Council Member Callan, Mayor Giles, Council Member Holmes, and Council Member Nielsen all voted aye, and the motion carried.

AB 21-171 Request to approve Artist Personal Property Lease Agreement for “Going to School” public artwork by Phil Wilcomb Economic Development Planner Delta James presented the Artist Personal Property Lease Agreement for “Going to School” public artwork by Phil Wilcomb. In 2008, the City of McCall and the McCall Arts and Humanities Council worked with several artists to lease public artworks to the City for display at various locations. All but one of these leased artworks has now either been donated to the City for permanent display or removed. The metal artwork “Going to School” by Phil Wilcomb, displayed at Brown Park, is the only remaining public artwork that is still leased by the City and its lease agreement is due for renewal.

MCCALL CITY COUNCIL Page 6 of 9 June 24, 2021 Regular Meeting

Sadly, Phil Wilcomb, the artist, is recently deceased. His family, the inheritors of the artwork, would like to continue to lease the artwork to the City for continued display in Brown Park. Display of the artwork has been considered and accommodated within the Brown Park improvement project currently underway.

At its March 29, 2021, meeting, the McCall Public Art Advisory Committee considered the continued lease of Wilcomb’s “Going to School” artwork and recommended to City Council that the lease agreement be renewed for a period of five years. The Artist Personal Property Lease Agreement has been reviewed by the City Attorney. The proposed term for the lease is July 1, 2021, to June 30, 2026.

The Council expressed support and did not ask any questions.

Council Member Maciaszek moved to approve Artist Personal Property Lease Agreement for “Going to School” public artwork and authorize the Mayor to sign all necessary documents. Council Member Nielsen seconded the motion. In a roll call vote Council Member Maciaszek, Council Member Nielsen, Mayor Giles, Council Member Callan, and Council Member Holmes all voted aye, and the motion carried.

AB 21-172 Request Approval of Resolution 21-24 Adopting a revised guidelines for setting recreation program fees and coaches’ discounts, account credit update and overall staff responsibilities Recreation Supervisor Tara Woods presented Resolution 21-24 adopting a revised guidelines for setting recreation program fees and coaches’ discounts, account credit update and overall staff responsibilities. Staff is requesting that Council consider a revision to the Recreation Fee Schedule. Currently volunteer coaches receive 50% off their registration fee; however, Parks and Recreation staff feel volunteers should receive a 100% fee waiver for their child’s participation in the program they are coaching. Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee unanimously agreed to waive volunteer fees as a good gesture and could help ease recruiting efforts. Staff is also recommending that the refund policy addressing refund payments due to class cancellation will be refunded.

The Council did not ask any questions and was supportive.

Council Member Callan moved to approve Resolution 21-24 adopting definition of terms used when setting recreation fees; ratifying the calculations to set fees charged for the services of the recreation department; establishing a refund policy; establishing a scholarship and discount policy and authorize the Mayor to sign all necessary documents. Council Member Maciaszek seconded the motion. In a roll call vote Council Member Callan, Council Member Maciaszek, Mayor Giles, Council Member Holmes, and Council Member Nielsen all voted aye, and the motion carried.

The Council took a short recess and reconvened 6:49 p.m.

AB 21-173 Request to Adopt Resolution 21-25 Designating Certain Properties as an “Area of Critical Concern”

MCCALL CITY COUNCIL Page 7 of 9 June 24, 2021 Regular Meeting

Diane Kushlan, consultant from Kushlan Associates, presented the Resolution 21-25 Designating Certain Properties as an “Area of Critical Concern”. Resolution 21-25 would designate properties east of the City boundaries within the area of city impact and owned by Pine Creek Ranch, LLC as an area of Critical Concern requiring the preparation of an environmental assessment. She gave a brief history regarding the project and explained that the need behind the request for the resolution is to give staff more time to address concerns.

The Council asked questions about addressing vehicle access, contacting the neighborhood, and local housing.

Council Member Maciaszek moved to adopt Resolution 21-25 Designating Certain Properties owned by Pine Creek Ranch, LLC as an “Area Of Critical Concern” and authorize the Mayor to sign all necessary documents. Council Member Callan seconded the motion. In a roll call vote Council Member Maciaszek, Council Member Callan, Mayor Giles, Council Member Holmes, and Council Member Nielsen all voted aye, and the motion carried.

Covid-19 Update and Review of Mask Metrics Status Police Chief Justin Williams gave the Covid-19 update. He reported 3 out of 4 of the matrix requirements is currently being met, and shared the vaccination rates, bi-weekly infection rates, and positivity rates are also within the matrix guidelines.

AB 21-175 Request Approval of Agreement to the U.S. Department of The Treasury Coronavirus Local Fiscal Recovery Fund Award Terms and Conditions City Treasurer Linda Stokes presented the agreement to the U.S. Department of The Treasury Coronavirus Local Fiscal Recovery Fund Award Terms and Conditions. The State of Idaho has received the first half of funding from the American Relief Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA) and the State Controller's Office is on track to deliver an easy-to-use portal for all Non-Entitlement Units of Local Government (NEU) to receive Local Fiscal Recovery Funds. A Non-Entitlement Unit of Local Government is any city in the State of Idaho with a population less than 50,000 that is not otherwise receiving direct funding from U.S. Treasury. Recipient understands and agrees that the funds disbursed under this award may only be used in compliance with section 603(c) of the Social Security Act (the Act), Treasury’s regulations implementing that section, and guidance issued by Treasury regarding the foregoing.

The recipient will determine, prior to engaging in any project using this assistance, that it has the institutional, managerial, and financial capability to ensure proper planning, management, and completion of such project.

City Manager Anette Spickard stated these funds are different from the CARES Act funding and the City will have until 2026 to spend the money. She explained the process for determining how to spend the money will come later as staff learns how to utilize the funds. Staff answered questions.

Council Member Holmes moved to approve agreement to U.S. Department of The Treasury Coronavirus Local Fiscal Recovery Fund Award Terms and Conditions and authorize the

MCCALL CITY COUNCIL Page 8 of 9 June 24, 2021 Regular Meeting

Mayor to sign all necessary documents. Council Member Nielsen seconded the motion. In a roll call vote Council Member Holmes, Council Member Nielsen, Mayor Giles, Council Member Callan, and Council Member Maciaszek all voted aye, and the motion carried.

AB 21-174 City Council Vacancy Discussion and Direction to Staff City Clerk BessieJo Wagner presented the City Council Vacancy discussion. Idaho Code § 50-805 states that the governing body of any city governed by the Council/Manager form of government shall consist of five (5) or seven (7) Council Members. As stated in Idaho Code § 50-702, each Council Member elected at a general city election, shall be installed at the first meeting in January following the election. The incumbents shall meet and conduct such business as may be necessary to conclude the fiscal matters of the preceding year; the newly elected shall then subscribe to the oath of office, be presented certificates of election, assume the duties of their position, and conduct such business as may be necessary.

Due to the resignation of Council Member Melanie Holmes, effective August 12, 2021, a new Council Member will need to be selected through the process outlined in the Governance Manual to fill the position until January 13, 2022, whereas the position will be filled through the regular election process occurring in November 2021.

The Council chose August 5th for interviewing interested candidates and then make their selection on August 12.

Upcoming Meetings Schedule Discussion Council discussed upcoming meetings.

ADJOURNMENT

Without further business, Mayor Giles adjourned the meeting at 7:22 p.m.

ATTEST: Robert S. Giles, Mayor

BessieJo Wagner, City Clerk

MCCALL CITY COUNCIL Page 9 of 9 June 24, 2021 Regular Meeting ATTACHMENT 1 6/23/21 Comments related to Wildlife Ordinance

25 6/11/21 11:24:56 Ernest Revello pob 518 McCall ID 83638 For

Please prohibit the feeding of wildlife. It is essential for the safety and health of both people and animals.

26 6/13/21 19:29:30 Shelby Edwards [email protected] Against

We love the "city" deer. They are part of the charm of McCall. Euthanizing or relocating the deer is detrimental to our community and we need to live with our wildlife and not eliminate them.

27 6/13/21 20:38:41 Darlene Kohout 917 Fairway Dr 14b Against

As a member of this community for 70+ years. I am appalled that you are considering working with F&G to round up our deer with intent to move and KILL them!!! This is our community and does not belong to the TOURISTS. If they are bothered by them then maybe they shouldn't come here! Warning signs to slow down might be the answer. Our Fox populations has dwindled to nothing because of allowance by our state to kill for profit- Furs to other countries still buying pelts. Please consider who pays your salary and ELECTS you!!

28 6/16/21 16:25:06 Larry Hauder 1504 Louisa Ave, McCall, ID For

I am in favor of the city taking action to regulate the "town deer herd". I see residents feeding them grain, apples, and hay. I see McCall guests stopping to throw fast food remains out the window for deer to eat, then taking a picture. I have had many many landscape plants and trees destroyed by the herd. I've seen visitors being chased when getting too close to the deer. In the spring, many deer look diseased and physically distressed as they pass through our yard.

29 6/16/21 15:20:05 Emily Hart 702 1st Street McCall, ID 83638 For

"I support a city ordinance banning feeding of wildlife (except songbirds) in McCall city limits and impact zone.

The deer problem is overwhelming at our house in the winter and spring. Up to 15 deer dwell on our property nearly every single day. The amount of feces is astounding, and the impact to the native shrubs and trees (mountain ash, lilac, currant, aspen, etc.) is significant.

The deer continue to visit throughout the summer and fall, using five game trails to transit the property while browsing. I do not garden at home due to their presence, and instead grow vegetables in a plot at the Community Garden, which has a deer fence.

I give the deer the widest berth possible when outside, but they have no fear of humans, and I don't trust them around kids. I am frustrated when I see people in my neighborhood leaving out food for them - I have seen quartered heads of iceberg lettuce, Cheerios cereal, and bales of hay. This is unconscionable human behavior.

I fully support culling the mule deer population if a diagnosis of exotic lice makes transplanting them to the wild impossible. These deer are sickly (yet somehow hyper-fertile - so many twins and triplets), and it is inhumane to allow them to continue propagating in downtown McCall, which is not their native territory.

They either belong in the wild, or they should be humanely dispatched.

Thank you. Emily Hart 702 1st Street McCall, ID" 6/23/21 Comments related to Wildlife Ordinance

30 6/19/21 14:26:50 Benita Shaw Giltzow 199 Hazel Place, Donnelly , ID 83615 Against "I do not agree with the current proposal to trap, remove or euthanize the town deer of McCall. They are a part of the culture and fabric of our mountain town. Educate, not Eradicate"". "

31 6/22/21 13:50:56 Mark Dooley 258 Ernesto Against "Will the public be given a chance to review the draft ordinance prior to City Council taking action. Please call at 208-573-4627 or email draft to [email protected], thanks "

32 6/22/21 16:56:09 Doris Eaton 212 N. 3rd Street, Suite D, McCall ID 83638 Against " ""I do not agree with and am fully against the current proposal to trap, remove or euthanize the town deer of McCall. They are a part of the culture and fabric of our mountain town. Educate, not Eradicate"".

Post signs about deer in the city, don’t feed deer signs. There are other things that can be done! This is their home. "

33 6/22/21 21:51:26 Marsha L Bennett 221 Lake St #9 McCall Id 83638 For

"I have lived on Lake St for 7 years. The deer are abundant. 3 deer have been killed in front of our residence in the last 5 months. They have eaten a lot of landscape materials down to the ground. A startled deer on more than one occasion has run through our property. If they had encountered a dog or a person this could have unfortunate consequences.

We hear screeching brakes and see many near miss collisions. Lake St is very busy. I am concerned that sooner or later a serious accident will occur- a collision or a car veering to miss a deer and hitting a pedestrian or bicyclist. The abundant deer on Lake St are a serious hazard.

I would rather see them removed then slaughtered on Lake St. I am very concerned for a serious accident on Lake St due to their presence causing a person’s injury or death. The danger and hazard on Lake St is much different than spotting them on the golf course. Allowing the town deer to stay and the population to grow will have severe consequences."

34 6/23/21 0:35:39 Sandra Borbonus 1746 N. Monterossa Way Eagle Idaho Against The charm of McCall is seeing and admiring nature and most importantly the wildlife! I am completely against forcing out, killing or relocating the deer � in McCall! They have more of a right to be there than we do.

35 6/23/21 0:35:03 Valerie Murray 23121 Freezeout Rd. Caldwell, Idaho 83607 Against "The mountains/forest is where deer should be allowed to roam. It is their natural habitat. The building of new buildings including homes and businesses is taking their habitat away. Deer should never be considered a nuisance, especially in McCall, Idaho. McCall is a mountain town.

You are taking their habitat away without any consideration there are generations of deer in the area.

Transferring them to another area is unfair to the deer and euthanizing them should not even be a consideration. Deer are basically a harmless creature.

If residents do not want deer wandering through their yards then build higher fences, or move back to a city where deer seldom roam around.

I for one would never take these creatures for granted. They are the innocent bystanders of people who are only complaining to be complaining. 6/23/21 Comments related to Wildlife Ordinance

Please vote against this action. The deer do not deserve to be taken out of the only environment they know.

Thank you,

Valerie Murray"

36 6/23/21 0:34:02 Danielle Custer 411f Deinhard Lane McCall ID83638 Against

"No I do not agree with the side proposal of transport, relocating and euthanizing deer by the Fish and Game.I would like the city to take pause and here from citizens, biologists etc. as well as consider other resort towns actions in this matter.

I do agree with a city ordinance making it illegal to feed them in city limits."

37 6/23/21 3:46:43 Stephanie Schaff 430 Ringel St. Mccall, Id 83638 Against

My husband and I have been full time residents in McCall since 2016. The reason that we love to live here is our proximity to nature and wildlife. These deer are part of what makes McCall so special and it would be a travesty to lose them.

38 6/23/21 6:40:53 Kristie Williams 1102 N. 7th St. Parma, ID. 83660 Against

"I am not a resident of McCall, however, my family are regular visitors. One of the things we love about your town is the opportunity to see the wildlife that has made their home there for so many years. I understand and agree that at times, all animals can be a “nuisance”, but so can a lot of people. Just like in many other areas across our beautiful state, with the exceptional growth we have experienced, we are slowly taking over all of the land that belonged to our wildlife. I am against your plan to relocate, trap, euthanize these animals just because they may be a bother to some people. This was their home first and it is our responsibility to learn to live with them and coexist.

With that being said, I am not a resident of your beautiful town and I don’t live with the challenges on a daily basis. But, I would ask that you consider my comments as well as the many others you are likely receiving.

Thank you for your time. "

39 6/23/21 7:36:47 Karen Scott 277 S Cobblestone Way, Eagle, ID 83616 Against

We have been visiting McCall frequently since 2001. Prior to that it had only been once or twice. The first 15 years we would stay at Worldmark. We absolutely loved when the wildlife would grace us with a glimpse. The deer were always big hit! The last few years, when we visit, we stay with friends or family, or at their homes when they are away. Even the thought of "removing ALL deer" from the city is disgusting! These animals have lived there for much longer than we humans! How in the world, as a human, can you even grasp the concept of wiping out hundred of living creatures? Sure, there will be a problem animal or two, from time to time...but for Heavens sake, these are LIVING ANIMALS! Who are you/we, to decide they shouldn't be here anymore? All of this because of what? And, is this the publicity you want for your beautiful mountain town...."they killed all of the deer in the town limits because some people thought they were a nuisance?"

6/23/21 Comments related to Wildlife Ordinance

40 6/23/21 7:20:57 Nancy Krahn 906 Ann Street, McCall Against

I do not agree with trapping, moving or euthanizing the town herd of deer. People moved into their home not the reverse. I agree that people should be educated about the reasons NOT to feed any of the wildlife in our town but I don’t think that a City Ordinance is the answer. As with so many other rules in McCall there is no one enforcing them so they are meaningless. Please leave the town deer where they are and do a “Don’t Feed the Wildlife” campaign to educate our locals and visitors about how to properly interact with our wild neighbors.

41 6/23/21 7:58:48 Veronique Borbonus 10060 W Roan Meadows dr Boise, ID 83709 Against

"The idea that some people believe the deer are a nuisance in McCall is disheartening. When you move to a mountain town/area, you learn to coincide with the animals who have been there before man.

The deer are intriguing to watch when we come across them in town on our visits.

They come because they feel safe, don’t take that away from them. " A new submission has been received for Report a Compliment or Service Concern at 06/24/2021 11:11 AM First Name: Jenna Last Name: Medina Email Address: [email protected]

Describe Your Concern: Keep the town deer.

A new submission has been received for Report a Compliment or Service Concern at 06/23/2021 11:18 PM First Name: Wes Last Name: Atkinson Email Address: [email protected]

Describe Your Concern: I highly oppose the deer eradication in McCall and I believe the feeding of the deer should be a fine. However completely removing the deer is a shame on the city and IDFG. This will be removing a part of McCall that makes it special. I want me kids to enjoy seeing the deer around town. Educate the public on feeding the deer and issue fines for those who do not comply.

A new submission has been received for Report a Compliment or Service Concern at 06/24/2021 7:39 AM First Name: Alexa Last Name: Martinez Email Address: [email protected] Address: 7583 w corona dr City: Boise State/Province: ID Zip Code: 83709 Describe Your Concern: Against removal of the deer from McCall.

A new submission has been received for Report a Compliment or Service Concern at 06/24/2021 6:19 AM First Name: Sandee Last Name: Vanderpool Email Address: [email protected] Address: 16068 Mountain View Road City: Mount Vernon State/Province: WA Zip Code: 98274 Describe Your Concern: Save the deer. We visit McCall 2-3 times a year.

A new submission has been received for Report a Compliment or Service Concern at 06/23/2021 4:11 PM First Name: Cathleen Last Name: Curtiss Email Address: [email protected] Address: 1575 Dragonfly Loop City: McCall

Page 1 of 46

State/Province: ID Zip Code: 83638 Describe Your Concern: I am really opposed to trapping, relocating and euthanasia of the local deer.

A new submission has been received for Report a Compliment or Service Concern at 06/24/2021 1:46 PM First Name: Mike Last Name: Jorgensen Email Address: [email protected] Address: 1426 nw 2nd str City: Meridian State/Province: ID Zip Code: 83642 Describe Your Concern: I am against the removal of Deer from the town of McCall or anywhere for that matter!! It’s a mountain town for God sakes

11 6/23/21 16:52:59 Susan Rader 2745 13th St. Clarkston, WA 99403 I would like to submit my objection to removing the town deer. It's a ridiculous and cruel thing you are proposing. I used to live in McCall, the deer are part of the charm. Please be mindfully of the eco system in this beautiful area. Thank you, Susan J. Rader

12 6/23/21 17:01:52 Brenda Jansson 8958 W Candleston ct Boise ID 83709 (lived in McCall for 15 years) Don't you DARE KILL or remove our wildlife!!!!! We love them like we love our pets and our family. They are part of our neighborhoods. How would YOU like it someone threw you out of YOUR home because some asshole (who probably just moved here from another state) wanted you gone???

14 6/23/21 18:17:50 Ed Orbea 17109 N Wylie Place, Nampa ID The Proposed Wildlife Code Amendment is pure/unadulterated BULL SHIT. Train the people to properly/correctly deal with the deer (including providing food) not the other way around!

15 6/23/21 18:33:23 Debra Matheson 1104 n b st Parma idaho 83660 If you want to live in the forest your in "their" home.

17 6/23/21 20:37:35 Michelle Koenig [email protected] I am not in favor of relocating the deer. People need to not be feeding them. I have witnessed times where 15+ deer hanging out at the mobile homes behind the Shell station. They are wandering around looking for food. The people there are feeding them. We saw them come outside and put food out. That has to stop. The deer don’t need to be relocated.

18 6/23/21 21:49:46 Julie Thorstad 3430 Estes st. Baker City, Oregon 97814 To remove Town Deer is a travesty for the town members. The deer are a part of this area as much as the mountain streams or trees surrounding McCall. Generations of families come to McCall to experience the wilderness, not just participate in the shopping or skiing activities. Town deer are a part of my home town Baker City and to remove them is like taking away the pine or sage smell after a good rain. It is wrong to remove the deer as this is their home!

23 6/23/21 22:24:57 Catherine Stein 1626 E Lake St, McCall ID This concept of relocating and stopping feeding of our local deer is cruel and something as a City Council Group I would

Page 2 of 46

NOT WANT TO BE ASSOCIATED WITH. I have been a property owner since 1976 and have felt the wildlife around town and it’s various neighborhoods totally charming and an important tool of education to our youth. Please table this insane concept and get busy filling the potholes or designating a new stop light location to save lives!!!!

24 6/23/21 23:47:29 Sandra wilkinson 269 Morgan Drive, McCall I am beyond saddened to learn of this Draconian proposal. With all the beauty that McCall has to offer, NOTHING can compare to the joy that we and our family and our five granddaughters have experienced in sharing this beautiful place with the many varieties of wildlife that pass through our yard on a daily basis. It is and always has been the main attraction for us. They were here before we were. We are encroaching on their space! Plans to remove this magnificent wildlife will turn McCall into another run of the mill tiny town with no special character or charm, instead of the lovely respite that it is. Please, please do not do this.

26 6/24/21 5:56:57 Randi Allred 5399 N RED HILLS AVE 83646 My family has been going to McCall for 36 years to visit, work and play. We see these deer every time and would be disgusted that they are removed! We the people are the problem! There has to be a better way and that is to let them be! Relocating will mean more euthanized. For once listen to the people of Idaho. Their are far more invasive problems to address within education in McCall and creating jobs for sustainable city. Choose carefully.

27 6/24/21 7:39:11 Allison Hatzenbuhler 13127 Hawks Bay Raod "We have built a community in woodlands. The animals were here and we infringed into their space and now we want them to leave. They are NOT a nuisance, we need to learn to live amongst them! If you don’t like them eating your flowers, plant something else. Are they in danger when crossing the street? Yes… perhaps we need to reduce the speed limits. We, AS PEOPLE, need to alter OUR behavior to fit in with their lives. We covered their feeding grounds by building more and more houses so what do we expect? They still forage for what they need. I can’t believe that the City of McCall would take the time and expense to do this. Spend that money on, and distribute, deer food with lice medicine in it and solve that part of the problem.

Personally, I think speeding is much more of a nuisance and danger to people than all of the deer. Put those funds to hire 3 additional officers to set up and catch speeders!"

28 6/24/21 7:46:45 Rick Hatzenbuhler 13127 Hawks Bay Road Have you ever seen the joy on visiting children’s faces when they see some of our “city herd” walking down the street? Have you heard tourists all suddenly quiet down, point and start taking pictures from the top of SRB or Sushi Place as 4 or 5 deer amble down the street? Have YOU Council members ever slowed down long enough to stop to “smell the roses” and appreciate what these animals do for the ambiance of McCall? We built homes in the middle of Bambi’s forest and now we want to kill Bambi. Pretty soon you will all think the Moose on a moose a island are a danger to us…. Too many fish in the lake are scary to swimmers, let’s kill them all. Look what we have done! Please rethink this.

29 6/24/21 8:19:13 Lori Scott 125 Jughandle Drive McCall ID 83638 Deer are not a nuisance. They are part of our community and should be left alone. People need to be educated and if they don’t appreciate our natural wildlife they should stay away.

Page 3 of 46

30 6/24/21 8:32:31 Michele Strang 45 Silver Fox Trail, McCall, ID 83638 The deer have been here long before we humans. McCall isn’t McCall without the local deer. Who are these people who are complaining? Please educate and fine people for feeding the deer. PLEASE do not remove or euthanize the deer. That’s heartless, that’s just idiotic! Don’t like the local residents (deer), move!

32 6/24/21 8:53:25 Garianne Mabe 806 E. Maine Ave, Nampa, ID 83686 I love visiting McCall! I often refer to McCall as my "happy place" largely due to the deer we see around town and at our timeshare. I love going to the mountains and experiencing the wildlife! If some of the residents of McCall don't like wildlife in their backyards, perhaps they should move elsewhere. After all, McCall is located in the mountains and the deer and other wildlife were there first! McCall and Idaho wildlife officials should be working for the wildlife, not the people that have encroached on wildlife habitats. I am an Idaho native and love the charm of McCall and the occasional wildlife sightings. I have a sneaking suspicion that those raising concerns about the "town deer" are out-of-staters that have relocated to McCall. Please stop letting them dictate what happens in our little slice of heaven. Another thing for the city council to consider is McCall's economy. I know many people (including myself) will be less likely to visit and spend money in McCall if the deer are relocated or euthanized. I encourage officials to leave the deer and other wildlife alone if they wish to retain the special charm of McCall.

35 6/24/21 10:16:45 Brenda Jansson 8958 W candleston ct boise id Sorry the deer are such a nuisance to you but WE like them here. And just in case you didn't know, WE are encroaching on THEIR land, NOT the other way around. I'm sure the Native Americans felt the same way when they were targeted for being a 'Nuisance'.

37 6/24/21 12:27:37 Patti Rahn 10493 Maymie Road Boise ID 83714 "Oh my goodness!!! Surely, the city and F&G have more important issues to deal with than this!!

I hope that enough people show support for this movement and that all that visit McCall will be able to continue enjoying the animals that were their first!! After all, in the big scheme of things, we are actually guests on their land!! "

40 6/24/21 13:46:31 Kim Hannah 981 Old Lebanon Dirt Rd., Hermitage, TN 37076 I am strongly against this. The world is watching. Do the right thing and leave the deer alone.

41 6/24/21 14:06:46 Sally Elliott 1940 Warren Wagon Rd, McCall, Id 83638 "It is unbelievable that the McCall City Council and the Idaho Fish and Game are even discussing controlling the deer or any local wildlife that they have determined to be causing problems in our Community. My husband and I have lived in McCall for 45 years because of the abondance of wildlife and the quality of the environment. The primary threat facing McCall is not from animals, but from the exponentiel increase of people in speeding cars, trucks and ATV's on our roadways. The human activity in McCall and Valley is simply not sustainable. We adamantly oppose the removal or killing of wildlife. Do not blame the wildlife."

43 6/24/21 14:50:52 Joey Pietri 225 Valley Springd Rd. McCall, Ldaho 83638 I vehemently oppose any forced relocaion or euthanization of Deer or any wildlife of McCall .

Page 4 of 46

42 6/23/21 8:15:51 Sallie Oberlin POBox 1722, McCall ID Against I find it difficult to believe the City Council would vote to remove one of McCall’s favorite visitor attractions, to say nothing about the smiles seeing our deer elicit from those of us who make McCall our home. Perhaps attention needs to be directed to visitors who see a crosswalk and stroll across without making sure there are no cars. Why not fine those who are seen feeding the deer (and other wildlife), post visible signs addressing fact that feeding wildlife interferes with the natural migration plan and monitor the results before you cause undue friction.

43 6/23/21 9:55:02 Sandie Schaumburg 5614 Lakewood Ave Caldwell, ID 83607 Against "The deer and wildlife is one of the main reasons why I myself, my family and other people go to McCall.

We always stop and take pictures of the deer in town. We always camp at Ponderosa and love watching them come through the campsites. We watch for them every morning and every evening. The mommas with their babies are the best.

That was their home way before it was anyone was around. Why in the world would we take them from their home and why in the world would anyone ever want to euthanize them???? Seriously???

IF people can't handle the wildlife in the mountains then they don't need to live there or even go up there.

Please leave the wildlife alone.. They call the place home."

44 6/23/21 10:10:06 Colleen Ross PO Box 510, McCall, ID Against "I am heartbroken that this proposed ordinance has gotten this far. Apparently, “the powers that be” have already made a decision, but I think it is a bad one and am completely against it.

A major reason many of us love living in McCall is our close relationship to nature. Our beautiful lake, Ponderosa Park, the surrounding mountains, and, yes, wildlife, especially the town deer and foxes. Yes, they occasionally complicate things, but if they could speak I am sure they would say we have done the same for them.

We live on a very busy street with a blind curve that is posted 20 mph, but the average speed driven is much higher. Many drive more than 30 mph. No thought is given the safety of any person or animal on or adjacent to the street. Last night our peaceful evening was interrupted by a young man driving an SUV who was “forced” to come to a stop because a young fawn and mother deer were crossing the roadway. The young driver yelled out his window, “F*%k you!” I thought there was an altercation going on, but were no other people or cars out there. He was yelling an expletive at the deer. I do not understand that mentality, but we see the aggressive driving, the honking and intentional driving “at speed” to scare the deer and to me it says volumes about our sense of entitlement and our species’ lack of empathy for other life.

Page 5 of 46

So, instead of getting mad at the deer, foxes and other wildlife in town, let’s try to figure out how to live with them: spend money on better traffic signs, give tickets to our perennial speeders, better educate visitors and residents about how to coexist with wildlife, and generally be grateful for the fact we do have wildlife all around us? That is part of the “magic of McCall,” after all? We cared enough about wildlife and the “wonder of nature” to enact anti-light pollution ordinance; why can’t we learn to live with nature instead of killing or “removing” it from town? We might as well all move back to the suburbs at that point?

Since some apparently want to “fast track” this ordinance, the final thing that breaks my heart is that this city council is not giving this issue the public hearing it deserves. This ordinance is not about helping the deer, but about appeasing a small group of people who seem to have a point of view that I do not think makes sense financially, scientifically, or morally. Nor is it workable at a practical level - after the deer are ""removed"", do you think other deer are not going to move back in to town to replace the removed deer? Passing this ordinance without a thorough public hearing with “live” testimony would leave wounds in the community. To me that would be the most heartbreaking thing of all. "

45 6/23/21 10:25:18 Sarah Williams 200 Jacob st. McCall Idaho Against I am against this proposal. This is the saddest thing I’ve heard. Deer are a gem to this community and what makes McCall precious to so many.

46 6/23/21 10:33:19 Ian Williams 317 Mountain Cove Court Against I am completely against this ordinance. We love the deer in our area and it would be a major mistake if the city moved to relocate them. They add to the beauty of McCall. Do not pass this.

47 6/23/21 10:28:01 Lew Ross PO Box 510, McCall, ID Against I agree with the recent editorial in the Star News: this issue deserves a public hearing with live testimony from both sides. Otherwise, this issue will become a permanent controversy, one that divides us rather than unites us. Personally, I enjoy seeing wildlife in town and think the degree of the "problem" is overstated. Like the resident geese in public parks nationwide, my guess is that our town deer are a permanent feature of life in the mountains. Let's be happy we live here and have them.

48 6/23/21 11:09:29 Kristiina Spencer 8016 W Whittaker st Boise Idaho 83714 Against I think this is ridiculous… what other resort town in the US does this?? If you don’t want wildlife on your property then don’t buy in the middle of a Forrest go purchase your property in the concrete jungle of the city…

49 6/23/21 11:38:03 Jeff Martel [email protected] Against "Jeff Martel, 1020 Cedar Lane, McCall.

I am for selective removal of sick or problematic wildlife, but I am against the full removal/euthanize of the “in-town” wildlife without further study. I think taking time and not rushing to a decision is always prudent. "

50 6/23/21 11:38:45 Sherri Pedersen 431 McGinnis St McCall Against I am against the trapping, relocating and euthanizing of the town deer in McCall. The will not survive a Winter out there!

Page 6 of 46

I do not feel the deer are a “nuisance”, only those that are in a hurry and traveling too fast (not 25 mph) and in their way. Also, those dog that are too close to a mama deer and her babies she is only protecting her babies, that is human and animal instinct.

51 6/23/21 13:38:21 Marta Paulson 624 Ruby Street Against I find it absurd to move wildlife from their habitat simply because we have built homes there. We are respectful of the animals near and around our home. They are not a nuisance, but rather a gift of Nature. Leave the animals in Peace.

52 6/23/21 13:57:49 Sarah Curtright 4365 W Cherry Lane Meridian, ID 83642 Against We visit the mountains to see wildlife

53 6/23/21 13:58:49 Tim Curtright 12856 Axel Donnelly, ID 83615 Against We live in the mountains to see/enjoy wildlife

54 6/23/21 13:59:23 Judy Curtright 12856 Axel Rd Donnelly, ID 83615 Against We live in the mountains to see/enjoy wildlife

55 6/23/21 13:57:59 Gail Rankin 675 Fox Ridge Lane For Deer are increasingly problematic in McCall, both on the roads and in our yards. As a physician, I am also very concerned that deer are a vector for ticks and will increase how rapidly we are exposed to Lyme disease and other dangerous infections. Thank you.

56 6/23/21 13:59:48 Cherie Wick 12856 Axel Donnelly Against I love to see the animals when I travel around

57 6/23/21 14:00:21 Connor Wick 12856 Axel Donnelly Against Manage people not animals

58 6/23/21 14:00:11 Bruce Rankin 675 Fox Ridge Lane For There are too many deer in the city doing too much damage.

59 6/23/21 14:00:43 Ashton Wick 12856 Axel Against Deer make me happy

60 6/23/21 14:05:17 Wendy Albright 1075 Shady Lane Loop, McCall, ID Against "My partner built his home in 1989 and since then we have enjoyed the deer and other wildlife in McCall. We have embraced their presence as part of having a home in a rural town. I am very much against removing them and am aghast that this matter has even been brought to the council for any type of consideration.

-Wendy Albright"

61 6/23/21 14:09:20 Jessie Farnsworth 1575 West Ryegrass Court Against I am against the relocation or euthanasia of any wildlife in McCall. I visit McCall frequently and love seeing all the wildlife that is present. I am a avid hunter and believe relocation would be to stressful on the animal causing death as well as euthanasia is cruel to do on any animal that is in good health. People moves into the home area of these deer and therefore the deer shouldn't be punished for something that those people decided. The people that live mccall knew what they were moving into before they purchased their home and or businesses. The deer presence is what brings some of the business to mccall as well. So not only is it going to cost money to get rid of the deer in general but you also be loosing money from the tourist who come up just to see the deer.

Page 7 of 46

62 6/23/21 14:09:11 Sue Schaffner 12961 Ponderosa Dr Donnelly Id Against As a native Idahoan and Donnelly property owner, I vehemently oppose this horrendous idea regarding our native wildlife! The mountains of Idaho belong to all Gods creatures and they certainty are NOT a nuisance.

63 6/23/21 14:16:36 Kim Brandt 10982 W Tioga St, Boise, ID 83709 Against I am adamantly opposed to the trapping, relocating or euthanization of the deer population, and any other native wildlife in the McCall area.

64 6/23/21 11:16:07 James and Debra Staup P.O. Box 1221 McCall, ID Against We, James and Debra Staup, are against any measure that would result in the ultimate removal, relocation, and eradication of our town deer. There are better and more humane ways to live with and manage our deer and other wildlife. The City Council may think what F&G does with our deer has no reflection on them, but it greatly does. The Council can definitely influence a better outcome. A no feeding ordinance is fine as long as it is backed by common sense .. meaning a humane wildlife management plan in place that supports and preserves our town deer here in their habitat. I sent an email to each of you two weeks ago with some realistic solutions other states and communities do. These solutions were from F&G Wildlife Experts. McCall Needs to be Proactive not Reactive. Let's stop this wrongful path and work to create a safe, reasonable, and humane path of preservation for our wildlife. .. James and Debra Staup

65 6/23/21 14:26:36 Brad Bartlett 1610 S Loggers Pond Place Apt. 16 Boise Idaho 83706 Against I am very much against this proposal. My in-laws have owned property off of Samson Trail for over 45 years and the deer have been a great source of enjoyment during that time. My kids grew up watching the deer and other wildlife roam freely around the property. Please reconsider this proposal as I believe it is a bad one. Thank you.

66 6/23/21 14:33:50 Kim French [email protected] Against Humans are the nuisance to wildlife, not the other way around. McCall is surrounded by forests and lakes. What kind of person wouldn’t expect there to be deer or any other wildlife. I agree the public needs educating on reasons why they should not be feeding the wildlife but relocation and euthanasia are a despicable solution.

67 6/23/21 14:42:07 James French [email protected] Against Humans are the nuisance to wildlife, not the other way around. McCall is surrounded by forests and lakes. What kind of person wouldn’t expect there to be deer. Educate the public on why they should not feed wildlife. Relocation and euthanasia are both a despicable option.

68 6/23/21 14:51:42 Jeanine Halbesleben 10960 W. Shetland Rd. - Boise, ID 83709 Against I am against the trapping, relocating and euthanizing of the town deer of McCall. They are part of the reason why my family loves McCall so much.

69 6/23/21 14:20:33 Patty Hickman 1603 Davis Ave Against "My husband and my self have lived on this street for 40 years, in that time we have watched the deer migrate on the same route year after year. Once the deer quit leaving in the winter we watched them use the same paths to move around town. I don’t claim to know why this started but I do for a fact know that their staying had nothing to do with people feeding them. So now fast forward years later and we have an abundance of

Page 8 of 46

deer in town. Yes deer are getting hit by cars but is that really the deer’s fault? No it is not! If the people driving our city’s roads would drive the speed limit of 25 mph as posted throughout town and pay attention instead of texting or what ever they are doing, they could easily come to a stop and not hit the deer.

I have taken the time to do some research on stopping distances at various speeds. 25mph: up to 85 ft to stop, 30mph: 109 ft, 35 mph: 136 ft and 60 mph: 305 feet. So my point is that if the speed limits were enforced in this town the odds of deer getting hit go exponentially down. So that solves problem #1. Mangy looking deer, this is what happens to deer in the winter no matter where they are, it happens to some dogs too! It isn’t because they are sick or infected with some deer disease or from people feeding them, it is their natural hair process. I am not saying there aren’t a few sick ones out there but for the most part our town deer are pretty healthy. It isn’t the fault of the people that are feeding the deer that they are getting hit as relayed to my husband by an uninformed police officer. I can show you pictures from 20-25 years ago that show the deer using the same migratory path and they still are in spite of all the building across the street.

I am against eradication of all the deer in this town and in favor of educating people and enforcing the speed limits!!!!

I will go so far as to offer any officer to sit I’m my driveway anytime and stop the constant stream of speeding cars on Davis Ave. I would venture a guess that you could pay for an officer hired for this purpose within a very short period of time.

Let’s try to work together and it will be a win win for all involved, especially the deer �!

Sincerely

Patty Hickman

Mccall"

70 6/23/21 15:10:55 Shermayne Young 9931 Hwy 45 Middleton, Id 83644 Neutral I agree to prohibit feeding the wildlife in question, but do NOT agree to removing the animals from the town.

71 6/23/21 14:38:45 Pamela Willett 7350 Gary Lane Boise, Idaho 83714 Against

McCall is NOT McCall without the deer! This has NEVER been an issue until our beautiful state has been inundated with transplants! The deer and the other abundant wildlife, are part of what makes McCall such a desirable place to live and visit! If you CHOOSE to live in nature, or recreate, then wildlife will be a part of that environment! This is an OUTRAGEOUS proposal!!! I support respecting wildlife and not feeding them, however, eradicating them from their home is a huge mistake! These are God's creatures, not a "nuisance" as a FEW are stating. The sweet deer are NOT the problem, too many people are!! I am very angry that this is even being considered! I have proudly lived in this gorgeous state for over 45 years and McCall is a place I cherish.....don't destroy the magic by removing one of the very things that makes it this way!

Page 9 of 46

72 6/23/21 15:53:25 Brian Recher 14005 hogue hollow road. Mccall ID 83638 Against I am 100 percent against this proposal. The local wildlife is a benefit to our community and not a nuisance. We are a nuisance to them

73 6/23/21 16:14:05 Sondra McMindes 3308 Shaggy Mane Against

It is fine to ban feeding of the deer. But, PLEASE don't kill or relocate them. The wildlife help make McCall the beautiful town that it is.

74 6/23/21 16:18:38 Zoran Trejos-French 1425 liberty at unit 5 Boise ID 83704 Against Euthanizing and relocating animals that have been native to the area before humans were in unethical and wrong. Idaho is beautiful state, doing this is destroying our home. Teach humans not to feed wildlife, not that it’s okay to kill wildlife when they get in our way.

75 6/23/21 16:35:24 Deborah Smit 507 Hemlock st, unit 72, McCall Against

The deer should be left alone. We have taken over their habitat in a very large number of locations. Why should they be the ones to suffer for our greed? Also, McCall prides itself on being a paradise for outdoorsmen and being able to see nature up close is becoming more and more rare.

76 6/23/21 16:31:35 Linda Tunis box 606 McCall Against

I am 100 % against the trapping and killing of our town herd. Snowden as well as many wild life services know trapping and relocation in almost a death sentence in itself. the backlash in public opinion, general response to this drastic action I think is very underestimated and will bring much sorrow , and great amounts of anger,hostility and cause more trouble than the deer.

77 6/23/21 16:16:55 Donna Hoffman 850 Shelia Ln,McCall,Id 83638 Against

"Please do not remove or euthanize our town deer. It’s a horrific idea. We are living in their habitat. They were here first this is their territory. Humans have decided to live here among the wild animals. So if you don’t like them, then you go live somewhere else. "

78 6/23/21 16:42:35 Jackie Mitchell 300 Mather Rd, McCall ID 83638 For

I agree with making the feeding of wildlife illegal, and the removal of town deer if needed. I trust my local fish and game officials and the judgement and decisions they will make.

79 6/23/21 16:49:49 John Riggins 662 Koski Dr., McCall, ID 83638 (PO Box 1925) For I support banning the feeding of game animals, such as deer and elk (those wildlife species managed as game animals by the Idaho Department of Fish and Game), within the curtrent and future city limits of the City of McCall. Said feeding ban not to include songbirds and hummingbirds, or non- game wildlife species, such as squirrels.

80 6/23/21 16:55:32 Melanie Curry 670 Koski McCall, Id 83638 Against

I am strongly opposed to this.

81 6/23/21 16:54:53 Marjolein Lolkema 3 Squirrel Ln, Garden Valley, 83622, ID Against I am against the trapping, relocating, and euthanizing of the town deer of McCall. This is proposing to just kill all wildlife. First Idaho started with the wolves, now these town deer. Next? McCall

Page 10 of 46 better should invest in eco-tourism, instead of killing or locate them in another part of the state (which basically means, killing them too). This is an idiot proposal. Like: complaining about trees because in the fall they lose their leaves and that is sooo inconvenient (and this is also a true story).

82 6/23/21 16:58:41 Brenda Jansson 8958 W Candleston ct Boise ID 83709 (

I lived in McCall for 15 years) Against Don't you DARE KILL or remove our wildlife!!!!! We love them like we love our pets and our family. They are part of our neighborhoods. How would YOU like it someone threw you out of YOUR home because some asshole (who probably just moved here from another state) wanted you gone???

83 6/23/21 17:12:46 Susan Cottrell 2517 E Ohio Ave Nampa Idaho 83686 Against

Wild life is one of the big attractions for enjoying McCall please don't take this away from us.

84 6/23/21 17:21:08 Jennifer Garland 1656 Davis Ave. Against

I absolutely oppose the proposal to remove and eliminate the deer or squirrels. We have reunited their natural habit and are increasingly destroying more habit through our greed and narcissistic habits and behaviors. Add climate changes and more and more wildlife will attempt to live in our areas where there is accessible water and food. Most of us that have been visiting or living in the area came here to be able to see, smell, feel and taste the most amazing environment. We are the nuisance, not the wildlife. Educate people on consequences of feeding the deer, create deer friendly zones on endowment lands rather than planting mansions for the rich, and find ways to open paths for the wildlife to traverse the area safely. Y’all can do better, be better.

85 6/23/21 17:26:51 Rod Groff 6316 castle Dr, Boise Idaho Against

The beauty of McCall is the coexistence of the wildlife.

86 6/23/21 17:27:07 Eddie and Danielle Gray 705 Reedy lane Against

We are wholeheartedly against transporting or euthanizing our town deer. The deer are not a “nuisance” the deer have been here far longer than we have. Please educate don’t eradicate, McCall native lived here 58 years, deer have been in town for generations it is what makes McCall a beautiful quaint town full of wildlife . Eddie and Danielle Gray

87 6/23/21 17:34:45 Jennifer Leavitt 6596 S Jessenia Ave, Boise ID Against

I am against the trapping and relocation of wild animals in the City of McCall, ID. The idea is absolutely asinine and ridiculous. Humans have invaded our native wildlife's habitat and need to adapt to their behavior, not the other way around.

88 6/23/21 17:38:39 Patricia Braganza 1201 Roosevelt Avenue, McCall, ID Against To trap and remove the "town herd" is cruel and inhumane. These deer know only this environment and climate. Most will not survive being moved to a totally different environment, plus have to compete against the deer already there.

89 6/23/21 17:42:12 Harlie Burgess P. O. Box 4416 McCall Idaho 83638 Against

Against this happening!

Page 11 of 46

90 6/23/21 17:46:24 Kris Cox 319 W Hunley, Ave Westport, WA 98520 Against

As a regular visitor to McCall since 2000, I am against the killing of any wildlife as that is a big reason why I continue to visit the area. If this were to pass I would be taking my travel money and spending it elsewhere for sure.

91 6/23/21 17:45:22 Teia McCormick 7700 S Carpenter Ave. Boise, Idaho 83709 Against If this passes, things will never be the same. Part of the appeal of McCall is the possibility of seeing wildlife. Removing all the deer and possibly uthanizing them is just wrong and heartless. And we as humans are better than that. This can't be allowed!

92 6/23/21 17:52:31 Kara-Jo A. Cone 331 Mather Road Against

I disagree with the trapping and euthanizing of the town deer of McCall. I disagree with them being a nuisance and love seeing them daily.

93 6/23/21 17:52:34 Margo Flaherty PO Box 515 Donnelly ID 83615 Against

I am against trapping removing euthanasia of town wildlife

94 6/23/21 17:54:57 Amber Levanger 236 Rio Vista Blvd Against

We love that mccall has local deer. It’s apart of McCall’s charm. We are against this completely. And we live here full time.

95 6/23/21 17:52:01 Chris [email protected] Against

I have lived in Idaho for 25 years and have purchased my hunting and fishing license and tags every year. To hear the council wanting to get rid of all deer in Town makes no sense. If you lived in New York City maybe but we’re here in Idaho which it seems like with everyone moving here from big cities to escape the concrete jungles it’s a shame that we can’t make room for animals. We keep building more homes eliminating habitat and natural feeding grounds. Funny how watching these out of touch councils and school boards can’t find something better to do then try to turn our great state into the next Portland!

96 6/23/21 17:56:22 Sara Brooks 2730 N Dalton ln Against

I do NOT support relocating of wildlife or the euthanization of McCalls deer. They deer were here before us and this is their home as much as ours. We’ve been living with them for as long as the town has been here and they are a part of it.

97 6/23/21 17:56:20 Mary Fain PO Box 1955 McCall Against

I do not agree with killing off the deer because they are a nuisance. I love driving in town seeing the deer. Living in the mountains includes wildlife. If you feel something needs to be done please relocate them. I do agree people feeding them is not helping the situation. Please to not make a quick decision just to get rid of them.

98 6/23/21 17:59:45 Rosie Saenz 5733 Abby Dr, Corpus Christi TX 78413 Against

Page 12 of 46

This is unfathomable! As a visitor to your beautiful town, I took many pictures of the local deer and think of this as a friendly town to animals. They are wonderful creatures that add to the serenity of your town. To murder them???? What are you thinking??? Shameful.

99 6/23/21 18:05:27 No 12966 Zoon ln, McCall Idaho 83638 Against

Vote: No

100 6/23/21 18:07:58 Omega Taylor 1896 W Lake Pointe Ct, Nampa, ID 83651 Against I am against the removal of the deer population in McCall. This is inhumane and will take away from the natural beauty that brings so much character to the area. Would we continue to do this in the future as other wildlife population move into the area?

102 6/23/21 18:15:42 Sandy Williamson McCall, Idaho Against

I’m against removing our beautiful town deer. They are truly magnificent to see and watch. They were here first. Leave the deer alone

103 6/23/21 18:16:11 Barbara Minton 1630 Davis Ave #23 Against

Although it makes sense to encourage people not to feed wildlife, this should be an educational process not a legal one. Second, I am against moving or euthanizing the town herd of deer.

104 6/23/21 18:17:44 Kristy Payme 600 S Winterberry Ct Nampa, ID 83687 Against

We LOVE the wildlife in McCall. It’s one of the things that make it a special place.

105 6/23/21 18:02:35 Sarah Reyes 909 E Jefferson St Boise, ID 83712 Against

Our family LOVES the deer and other wildlife in McCall!!!

106 6/23/21 18:20:06 Barbara Harper 156 Pile St, P.O.Box 69, Ramona,Ca 92065 Against My family loves coming to MC Call each year to visit. We always enjoy watching the deer roam around the town. What a sad day when an animal is called a nuisance for just being in it’s own environment. Who really is the nuisance here?

107 6/23/21 18:22:47 Donna Robinson 507 Bluewater Hwy , Surfside Tx 77541 Against My Grandparents owned a cabin in McCall many years ago. We would vacation there in the summer. We loved the natural beauty and enjoyed watching the deer. Please do not kill the deer . They have every right to be there. Thank you for your time .

108 6/23/21 18:17:07 Marvin Lockwood 117 Gavin’s Place, Yankton, South Dakota. 57078 Against I live on the edge of Yankton, South Dakota. We have deer that I feed regularly so I can enjoy the wildlife up close. Fun to see how they evolve through the seasons... Viewing fawns with mom or watching the young bucks grow antlers and eventually grow to majestic bucks. I believe it has been good for my mental health to be closer to all wildlife!!

109 6/23/21 18:25:55 Tami Beus 1412 mill rd Emmett I’d 83617 Against

It was their home long before all these people calling them a nuisance were there I think that’s just wrong and cruel let them live there to have their babies and go back where they go

Page 13 of 46

110 6/23/21 18:24:27 Brandy Jones 1241 Herrick St McCall Idaho 83638 Against

With all due respect, I am pleading with you to NOT take our town deer. These town deer are what made me want to live, work and raise my children here in McCall. These beauties are fascinating and intriguing to watch. I love watching these deer in my yard as well as through my work windows. My children tell family and friends about the deer they live with. This would be so heartbreaking for many McCall residence as well as our town visitors.

111 6/23/21 18:31:23 No feed ordinance 1104 n b st Parma idaho 83660 Against

If you want to live in the forest you need to realize you live in "there" home

112 6/23/21 18:27:07 Amanda Brunmeier 11599 cabin creek st Against

"I understand the nuisances humans cause by feeding wildlife. I also understand the reality of population growth. Removing the wildlife from McCall or Valley county for that matter would take away from the natural environment of the area!!

Spend your fish and game allocated funds more resourcefully. Educate your visitors post signs, fine those should they be caught feeding animals or leaving food accessible while camping in a state-city- county park, visited by wildlife, but don't punish the animals and others who know how to behave as decent humans for the few new comers who don't.

I oppose the matter at hand and ask you do not enforce this matter."

113 6/23/21 18:02:47 John Henry Mitchell III 300 Mather Rd McCall, ID 83638 For "#thintheherd!

It doesn't take a wildlife biologist to tell you mule deer migrate! They should not be in mccall during the months of dec thru may. Stop selfishly feeding the deer which prevents them from migrating (for your own instant gratification) and Let idfg manage the wildlife so we can Get them the hell out of town, duh!!! Long valley is not winter habitat for mule deer or elk for that matter and if you cant handle that simple fact, move. Stop feeding deer potato chips in the shore lodge parking lot and Go watch them in their natural habitat, anywhere idfg is going to move them, outside of town. "

114 6/23/21 18:27:01 Kori Merlino 494 Cammy Drive Against

I do not support this proposal to diminish the population of deer in McCall. The beauty of our wildlife, here in McCall, is one of the reasons we live here as full-time residents. It breaks my heart to think that there is a possibility of ridding this majestic area of such beautiful wildlife. I support the increased education on the effects of domesticating these beautiful animals, make fines steep for feeding them if you must, but DON’T take them away!

115 6/23/21 18:43:00 Judy Pridham 2048 Eastside Way Against

I agree enforcing not allowing the feeding of the deer and wildlife (other than songbirds) however I DISAGREE with removing the deer from town.

116 6/23/21 18:39:08 Moriah Riley 11243 W Silver River Loop Against

Page 14 of 46

As a gardener I can fully understand the desire to keep wildlife off of my property and away from my prized garden! SO I INSTALLED A FENCE!! Under no circumstances EVER do I feel there is a need to kill a creature of God!! We all serve a purpose on this earth and we all deserve the life God gave us!! I strongly oppose this ordinance! We have absolutely no right to take the life of an animal outside of ordinary circumstances like for the purpose of food. “Nuisance” is simply not a respectable reason to end the life of an innocent animal! I strongly ask you to vote NO on this matter! Thank you

117 6/23/21 18:46:17 Janet Williamson 1225 hwy 26 Against

This is a poor substitute for planning for growth. Do your homework! Have the public meetings.

118 6/23/21 18:44:23 Ann Taylor 8971 Bowmont Rd. Nampa Id. 83686 Against

The educational part of this ordinance is fine. People should not be feeding the animals. But the costs associated with catching, transporting and releasing large wild animals does not make any sense in this economy. Even more troubling is the moral aspect of euthanizing these animals. It seems odd to move to a mountain town and then be bothered by the mountain animals that drew you to it in the first place. Are they 'inconvenient'? Yes. Educate, don't annihilate.

119 6/23/21 18:59:09 Anna Roy 1664 Warren Wagon Road Against

We absolutely love the deer! It is what makes McCall so special! They are very welcome on our property! Please do not kill these beautiful animals to make McCall more like a city. Killing these animals will ruin the mountain life that we all enjoy. McCall is a mountain town and not a city. If one does not enjoy the forest animals, then move away. No one is making you stay!

120 6/23/21 19:02:50 Michelle Streiff 932 Strawberry Lane McCall Idaho Against

I do not support moving or killing the deer. I’m okay with an ordinance to prohibit feeding wildlife.

121 6/23/21 19:26:22 Corii Williams Calgary, AB, Canada Against

I was just made aware of a few disgruntled individuals in the town of McCall who are wanting to get rid of the local deer because they are a nuisance. We have been visiting McCall on and off for the past 9 years and my American husband longs to call it home one day for the reason of it's untouched beauty. The wildlife makes McCall what it is. Leave them be. Deal with the disgruntled people, not the wildlife. They were there first and should be respected as such.

122 6/23/21 19:17:49 Heather Troughton 231 NW 10th Street, Ontario Oregon 97914 Against PLEASE do not do this. Idaho is where I am from (where I work and grew up) and McCall is a beautiful place. Please do not take away WHAT IS Idaho. Wildlife is so amazing for young children to see, even older people who may have never seen anything like this. Why take them from their home, their land, for us humans to “not be bothered by them”. It’s sad. Just sad. What is happening to McCall? And for Idaho for that matter? If we can’t have/ co-exist with wildlife in the mountains cuz they “annoy” locals (new people moving from out of town), then we are on a very slippery slop...

123 6/23/21 19:36:17 Charlie Glenn 2619 fruitvale rd, Council Id Against

HUGE MISTAKE.

124 6/23/21 19:42:33 Katie Gwinn 1022 Violet Way, McCall Idaho 83638 Against

Page 15 of 46

Once you start removing the animals you begin a slippery slope of choosing which animal lives. This is their home and they were here first. If residents and visitors are educated not to feed and fined if non- compliance all in McCall will win

125 6/23/21 19:48:57 Mary Beth Resimius 3315 Whitefield Lane #1569, McCall, ID 83638 Against I love our Town deer.

126 6/23/21 19:36:49 Ginger Riggins 662 Koski Dr., PO Box 1925, McCall, ID 83638 For I am for the ban on the feeding of deer in McCall. In past years I have had a summertime neighbor who has routinely fed the deer all summer long. When the couple leaves in the fall the 10-20+ deer sit on their lawn looking for food for days. Then the deer turn to my yard looking for food and destroy my bushes and trees. It's sad to see the deer being fed corn all summer, which I have been told by the Forest Service is unhealthy for the deer. In the fall during the rut the bucks become very aggressive and it is dangeous for me to even be in my own yard. Thank you for your willingness to pass a ban on the feeding of deer in McCall.

127 6/23/21 19:52:24 Britny McCoubrey 10008 W Tanglewood Dr Against

Its a privilege to live near wilderness and wildlife. Spending tax money on killing wildlife in a place where it's a perk seems nonsensical to me. And many enjoy the wildlife they get to see. Some moved to McCall abd similar places FOR that privilege.

128 6/23/21 19:43:27 Meg & Steve Glasgow 235 Ernesto Drive, McCall Idaho 83638 Against "We are against the trapping, relocating or euthanizing of town deer.

The wildlife in McCall is part of what makes it so special. Instead of destroying these animals, we would prefer to see more effort spent educating residents (and visitors) NOT to feed the animals and HOW to use safe methods to deter animals from gardens."

129 6/23/21 19:55:25 Kim Knuth 16 Bobcat Ct, Garden Valley, Id 83622 Against

I am against the trapping, relocating, and euthanizing of the town deer in McCall. My family frequently spends time in and around McCall and we love the wildlife. Please don’t do this.

130 6/23/21 19:53:27 Tanya Masterson 2 Sawtooth Ct Against

We used to have deer when we built 19 years ago in Blackhawk when there were only a few cabins. Now with so many homes we very seldom see any. I so look forward to seeing them in town. I love when I have to stop because a car is in front of me letting deer cross the highway and the kids in the car ahead are pointing and enjoying our wildlife. Please don’t do away with them. They are a part of McCalls uniqueness. Enough has already changed.

131 6/23/21 19:49:43 SUZANNE COFFEY 2112 W Neilscott Dr. Nampa, ID. 83651 Against

"I have no problem with the Education section.

I do have a problem with relocating or euthanization of any of the deer from inside the City limits or anywhere near the City of McCall.

Page 16 of 46

My sister and brother-in-law owned the mortuary there since I was in my early teens. I practically grew up there on the weekends. At the age of 60 I still get excited to see the deer grazing in town. I can't even fathom that your taking this into consideration!!!! So many mornings I would wake up to deer in the front yard or back, that was Mountain living!! Its part of nature that was there first. Those complaining can move - and if its the guy buying the mortuary out (lol), I will gladly go knock him into next week. Got use to the school being there, but was floored when the subdivision went in.

Again, Im floored that has even been brought up for discussion.

PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE do not vote for approval for relocating or Euthanizing the Deer out of McCall City limits.

Respectfully,

Suzanne Coffey"

132 6/23/21 19:58:28 Sue Switzer 224 Moonridge Dr. PO Box 4164 McCall Idaho 83638 Against The McCall "herd" has been an asset for the tourist and local community. While they are considered at times to be a nuisance, I believe most of us who live here love seeing them. There are other mountain towns who have adjusted to deer, moose, bear etc. in there towns and have accommodated them. Not relocated them. People need to be educated on how to help the deer, and how to cohabitate with them. This is their area, we have taken over their habitat. Where is the compassion for our wildlife??

133 6/23/21 20:11:14 Christi kenley 13775 Clearview road mccall Idaho 83638 Against The fact that people are even considering such a disgusting measure is despicable. We live in the mountains. We live in deer country. Don't like it? Leave.

134 6/23/21 20:10:56 Lisa Loera-Rhinehart 300 Washington St # 214 McCall ( also P.O. Box 597 83619) Against I feel it is wrong to just move or euthanize an animal because it may visit a certain property regularly. Certainly we have to share the land with those born on it. We have a few deer that regularly visit our condo property. They’re not hurting anything. They’re not destructive like some of the human visitors can be. It’s ridiculous to try to take the wildlife out of a mountainous, forested area. Especially just to keep a few humans more comfortable. Thank You for your time on this.

135 6/23/21 20:17:09 Elena Weza 481 155th ave se Bellevue Wa 98007 Against We vacation in McCall every year and one of the things we look forward to is the deer around our timeshare. I am totally against removing them from the area. They are part of the magic of McCall.

136 6/23/21 20:17:08 Kristi Christensen 906 conifer St McCall Idaho 83638 Against We love the deer visiting our yard. Our guests always get so excited to see deer so close. Such a treat. We've moved in on the deer. They were here before us and we should respect that.

137 6/23/21 20:19:56 Molly Lewellen 2245 SW 1st Ave, Fruitland Against Keep MCCall Idaho! People that move here can learn what it’s about or leave,

138 6/23/21 20:22:59 Martha subia 820 w homedale rd Against What is our world coming to? To disregard and eliminate the nature, which by the way existed before being populated by

Page 17 of 46

humans, is a disgrace and I can’t believe the city of McCall would propose such a measure. The wildlife is one of the prize possessions of McCall. Let them be.

139 6/23/21 20:23:34 Trishanne Beckner 24689 Warren Wagon Rd Against Unfortunately the “some” people more than likely are transplants and do not understand these deer have been coming into town long before they ever thought of living in McCall. And here we are bending to the “some” people. You live in a mountain community, what did you expect. Next the city will be plowing driveways because it snows too much. Leave the deer. If you don’t like it sell.

140 6/23/21 20:26:35 Heather Hamann 409 W 1st St Fruitland, Id Against I know I do not live in McCall but I visit frequently and it would be so sad to remove animals from the home that they have had as well. Part of being in the mountains is being a part of the mountains. And part of that is living with animals and with beauty and the disturbance that it comes with.

141 6/23/21 20:28:25 Debra WINN 540 Linder Ave. Kuna, ID 83634 Against I am 100% totally against this!!!

142 6/23/21 20:35:53 Michelle koenig [email protected] Against The public need to be educated to not be feeding these wild animals.

143 6/23/21 20:35:57 Teresa Lynch 805 Agate St McCall Idaho 83638 Against I am against the order to thin out the local herd of deer in mccall by any means!

144 6/23/21 20:37:20 Garth Lynch 805 Agate St McCall Idaho 83638 Against "I am against the order to thin out the herd of deer in mccall"

145 6/23/21 20:37:26 Alana Duke 117 E Butterfield St Weiser Idaho 83672 Against This is wrong

146 6/23/21 20:36:20 Ron Mattox 13650 S. Coquille St. Nampa, Idaho 83651 Against We visit the City of McCall two or three times a year. We especially enjoy the deer and we would hate to see them captured, relocated, or destroyed. The deer are a big hit with everyone. Thanks

147 6/23/21 20:34:34 Sheri Petersen 626 Blue Water Circle, McCall, Idaho 83638 Against My family has been coming to McCall for over 40 years and we have been home owners since 2009 and WE CARE DEEPLY about the deer and wildlife in McCall! We strongly oppose removing deer in McCall. This is a very bad idea! I do not know anyone that wants the deer removed. It is the mountains.....let the deer be free. Warmly, Sheri Petersen

148 6/23/21 20:50:48 Hanna Lynch 805 Agate St McCall Idaho 83638 Against I am against this proposal to thin out the herd of deer in mccall.

149 6/23/21 20:52:27 Bethany Allie 12209 W Foxhaven St, Star ID 83669 Against Our family vacations in McCall and Ponderosa State Park multiple times a year. I believe it is a terrible mistake to remove the deer from McCall. They are a large part of why we visit. They don’t bother us and we don’t bother them. We don’t feed them either. We enjoy watching them. We just visited Glacier National Park and I said to my family how much I prefer Ponderosa due to all the deer. Please leave the deer alone!

Page 18 of 46

150 6/23/21 20:59:42 Ginny Ackley 250 Cold Creek Court McCall Against Enough is Enough. Don ‘t you have better things to do than to waste time and money on this. This is part of the charm of McCall and brings tourists back time after time to drive into town and “I spy the lake” or seeing the deer.

151 6/23/21 20:56:03 Jan Journey 12912 195th Ave Ct E Bonney Lake Wa 98391 Against We visit Mccall every year and look forward to seeing the deer �. They are part of the Mccall experience. Please leave let them continue to explore the territory that was once theirs.

152 6/23/21 21:05:36 Frank Journey 12912 195th Ave Ct E Bonney Lake Wa Against It seems certain organizations are attempting to create job security in transporting wildlife. Let nature work as intended; after all, they were roaming the area before the development of what is known as McCall, Idaho.

153 6/23/21 21:14:02 Julio Vega 505 post oak lane Burleson, Texas Against "Please do not disturb the wildlife in McCall. I have been vacationing there for years. One of the great things about McCall is the wildlife. Teaching my grandchildren and seeing the excitement in their eyes when they see the animals, is priceless.

Please don't take that away. "

154 6/23/21 21:23:23 Pat Farrell 14118 Tricia St. Against Leave the wildlife alone. It's their home too!

155 6/23/21 21:24:40 ReNae Bradfield 705 Broken Rein Rd, P.O. Box 841, McCall Against I am against removal or destruction of the town deer. They bring joy to myself and my 92 year old mother. I am not against penalizing those people who feed them. Please leave them alone and keep McCall “wild”.

156 6/23/21 21:25:01 Beverly wise 11428 west Hiawatha dr., Boise ID 83709 Against Absolutely against any trapping, removing, rehoming or euthanasia of any deer in or around McCall. This would be a horrible thing to do for all and should be a crime to even consider it. Ive lived in the country in Oregon, Washington, and Colorado where deer, elk, bear, cats, raccoons etc were all a part of the joy of living in the country and on acreage. They should stay. It’s their home too and they matter.

157 6/23/21 21:30:06 Melinda Thomson(Carey) 18 Chisholm Place Wyndham Vale Victoria Australia Against As a former resident of McCall what made it special was the beauty of the wildlife and nature.

158 6/23/21 21:16:04 Steve Baker 2156 E. Hyper Dr. Meridian Idaho Against "I can not believe the City of McCall wants to kill the deer and other wildlife. We are owners in Hearthstone and some of our favorite memories and highlights of our stay is seeing deer and other wildlife in the area. Family and friends that stay with us absolutely love seeing these beautiful animals. If you allow the killing of this wildlife it kills what make McCall unique and so special. Please allow these beautiful animals to live and be a part of what makes McCall stand out above other tourist areas. Thank you for your consideration.

Steve Baker"

Page 19 of 46

159 6/23/21 21:16:35 Connie Ickes 1915 Bear Basin Road, McCall, Idaho 83638 Against I am very much against the current June 24th, 2021 proposal to trap, move, and potentially euthanize the town herd of deer. There has got to be a more humane way to deal with this issue!! I urge our community to work together to come up with a plan that includes a vision for the future of wildlife in our community that our children and grandchildren can be proud of. This is something that can not be undone. Please think it through carefully.

160 6/23/21 21:43:11 Kriss Steuart 628 E Woodbury meridian idaho Against Humans should be smart enough to abide with wildlife. Too bad it appears they are not.

161 6/23/21 21:44:18 Christi Smith 1855 Jones Road, Weiser, ID. 83672 Against I was born in Idaho 63 years ago and have never lived anywhere else. Growing up, I spent a lot of time in McCall and always have throughout my lifetime. Removing deer from the city of McCall is a REALLY stupid idea. Seriously, don’t you have bigger things to worry about?!?

162 6/23/21 21:45:54 Tarra owings 1369 nw 4th ave Ontario Oregon 97914 Against The town is a beautiful place and it is known for its nature and wildlife to trap and get rid of the town deer would ruin a huge part of the towns appeal. If they are considered a nuicence then I feel you are living in the wrong area. Leave the deer bee and co-excist with them

163 6/23/21 21:49:49 Amy Klingler Against the matter Against "I am against the trapping, relocating and euthanizing of the town deer of McCall.

I understand culling out the sick and infected. We live in the mountains, in their backyard and it's quite unique having them around and sharing the ecosystem with them. It’s about educating not eradicating."

164 6/23/21 21:54:39 Brenda Hill 1418 Us Hwy 95 Weiser I’d 83672 Against We come several times a year to enjoy nature and wildlife in your area. We used to have a mountain home and love this area. I can’t tell you how happy it makes me to see deer wander the streets and hang out in the trees. We’re familiar with the nuisances animals can be, but the joy outweighs the hassle in most cases. We’re in their home, not them in ours. We need to respect that.

165 6/23/21 21:31:11 Dan O'Malley 1535 McCall Ave. McCall, Idaho 83638 Against "I am against the proposed wildlife ordinance. I feel that given the opportunity and proper education, locals and visitors alike can be educated regarding the harm that can be done when wildlife and people interact in negative ways. The deer have been present within city limits (and surrounding areas) nearly year-round for decades. I live in a neighborhood of the city where there are several large wooded areas. This weekend alone, I counted no fewer than 32 individuals and groups of people travelling on our street, who stopped either to view or photograph the few deer that were present and grazing on grass near the street.

It was obvious that the deer were not seen as a nuisance, and rather as a type of attraction. Several of the people I saw over the weekend returned two and three times to the area to view/photograph the deer. I have witnessed these same actions by visitors and locals alike, continually throughout the year, for the 11 years I have lived in my home. I have also witnessed five negative encounters between people with their dogs and the local deer. In every instance, the deer appeared to be attempting to protect themselves or their young because an irresponsible dog owner allowed their dog(s) off leash on a public

Page 20 of 46 street/area illegally, and the dog(s) either chased after, or physically attacked the deer. In two of those instances, the dog involved was owned by an acting city council member at the time (Laura Scott).

I believe that education and not eradication is the answer to this proposal, and I do believe that education will potentially be cheaper financially, with much fewer wildlife lives lost due to eradication efforts."

166 6/23/21 21:57:57 Paula Mannlein 2385 E Amity Rd Meridian ID 83642 Against Wildlife here long before people. People should be happy that they are around. Maybe remove people from wildlife habitats. Which is pretty much everywhere.

167 6/23/21 22:01:32 Shannon Riggs 8097 Waterleaf Ave Nampa ID 83687 Against I’m against harming the deer/wildlife in McCall.

168 6/23/21 21:59:00 Sherry McTigue 1437 E Lewis, Boise, ID 83712 Against "As a decades-long McCall visitor, and former resident and business owner, I emphatically oppose the proposed Wildlife Ordinance. This is unnecessary, ill-conceived and reprehensible. McCall without wildlife is like Boise without the Greenbelt. What next - drain the lake because mosquitoes are there?

Please, please deny this proposal. It would be an incalculable loss to the McCall so many, many people love and cherish. "

169 6/23/21 22:11:51 Heather Potts 1017 Cee Way Loop, McCall Against I am against, if it leads to IFG removing and/or euthanizing town deer. It bothers me that Wildlife Management would allow this to happen, they are suppose to protect these animals.

170 6/23/21 22:14:27 Patty Stanbrough 753 W Tropical Dr Nampa, ID Against We just spent the weekend in McCall and had a wonderful time. Our favorite part of our visit we to see a couple of wild deer.

171 6/23/21 22:16:50 Pamela Frazer 19493 Red Eagle Way. Caldwell Idaho 83605 Against Please reject this!! The beauty and wildlife are why we come to the beautiful outdoors in McCall. There is absolutely no reason people and deer can’t live together!!!

172 6/23/21 22:20:50 Jamey McInally End of the Road Against "against this happening" a "nuisance" Really are your flowers more important then the wildlife?

173 6/23/21 22:19:35 Jan Beckwith 5378 Elk Ridge Dr, Eugene, OR 97402 Against As a long time resident of Idaho, and frequent visitor to McCall, I wish to voice my concern for any actions that might lead to removal of the wildlife in and around McCall. The wildlife are an asset to the community and belong on the land. Is there any other way to prevent artificial (people actively) feeding?

174 6/23/21 22:24:50 Stan Kalinovskiy 114 East Lake St McCall ID 83638 Against I have a 3 yr old son we love to see the freindly deer walk thru our yard to ponderosa lake every year and its really fun for the kids and adults. That's ridiculous to remove them. Strongly disagree with the proposed Stance on the matter. what is this... never been in issue and all of a sudden some people move in and want to change McCall to there liking and its a nuisance? go live somewhere else like the city were you wont see deer!

Page 21 of 46

175 6/23/21 22:30:08 Dona Jeka 12604 W Murchison, Boise. Id Against Keep the deer! They are part of the appeal of McCall

176 6/23/21 22:35:26 Sara Lee 8517 HWY 95, Payette, ID 83661 Against Please let the town deer stay town deer.

177 6/23/21 22:34:54 Christine Cruickshank 311 Burns Rd, McCall ID 83638 Against Leave the deer alone. It’s part of the charm of McCall and it would be a travesty to harm them.

178 6/23/21 22:43:30 Chris Joyal P.O. Box 672 New Meadows Idaho 83654 Against I am against this

179 6/23/21 22:56:54 Barbara Langdon 302 Mather Rd #A22 Against No! I love those deer. It’s one of the highlights of being in McCall. Please do not euthanize them.

180 6/23/21 23:13:45 Susan Evans 201 Rio Vista Blvd. McCall, ID 83638 Against Wildlife is critical to the health and happiness of life in McCall. Let them remain and be loved!

181 6/23/21 23:16:03 Jennifer Stickles Boise ID 83709 Against Not for this

182 6/23/21 23:19:34 Teresa Wilson 216 Angus Lane. Donnelly, ID Against We are in their territory. Let them stay.

183 6/23/21 23:19:56 Marilyn Buchholz 208 Rosemont, San Gabriel, CA Against What a cruel and outrageous proposal. These animals have just as much right to live and to live in their current home. You should be ashamed of yourselves.

184 6/23/21 23:25:54 David Atkinson 13395 W. Paint St. Boise ID 83713 Against I am against the trapping, relocating and euthanizing of the town deer of McCall

185 6/23/21 23:27:17 Michelle Arguello 1918 Cambridge St Caldwell idaho Against No wildlife should be killed because they are a nuacence. That is so wrong!! They have a right to life. They are beautiful living creatures and should stay that way.

186 6/23/21 23:28:09 Regan Flanagan 635 Ruby St McCall Idaho 83638Against I am highly against the trapping, relocating, and euthanization of the deer in McCall.

187 6/23/21 23:06:33 Deborah Wetherell 3550 KP Cove Mccall, ID 83616 Against The McCall City Council needs to table the wildlife ordinance and tell Fish and Game to back off. The residents of McCall need to be included in any discussion/solution regarding the resident wildlife. Furthermore, in my opinion, McCall has more urgent needs/problems to address. (affordable housing; overburdened infrastructure; growth management coupled with zoning requirements). Leave the deer alone. Tell Fish and Game to move on. McCall will manage its own resident wildlife. Let's not make national news as the lovely little Idaho mountain town that wiped out its deer population overnight. Idaho has enough of an image problem right now . . Thank you.

188 6/23/21 23:37:31 Candace Sherwin 4879 W Mystic Cove Way Boise ID 83714 Against I am against the trapping, relocating and eutanization of the McCall town deer.

Page 22 of 46

189 6/23/21 23:53:38 Michelle Campbell 2304 NE 16th St. Fruitland, ID 83619 Against Please don’t remove the wildlife from the city of McCall. It is part of what makes McCall so great.

190 6/23/21 23:54:34 Joseph S Wasula 391 Silver City Drive, Boise Against I am against this stupid ordinance. Maybe we should eradicate all the people who are nuisances! There are far less of them than there are of our favorite, quiet, beautiful critters. Go ahead and pass your do not feed the animals ordinance BUT do NOT let fish and game take this measure as a call to eradicate and eliminate the animals of our beautiful state!

191 6/24/21 0:13:56 Vickie Riss 11 Wakerrobin McCall ID Against STRONGLY against. This is a horrific measure & degrading to this town.

192 6/24/21 0:16:11 Karen Roben 8045 Chancellor Drive Colorado Springs, Co 80920 Against There is no reason to euthanize. I lived in Boise at a time. I am in Colorado now, we have deer, squirrels and rabbits and I would fight the same thing if the city ever proposes such an ordinance.

193 6/24/21 0:42:55 Michele Moncure 41741 Switzerland Dr Against I am absolutely against removing the town deer.

194 6/24/21 0:05:36 Becky Thomas 570 Shelia Lane McCall Against "Before any decision can be made I feel the community needs to see concrete data on why these deer have become a “nuisance” now. You have some people on the community all fired up thinking FG is going to kill ALL of the town deer including Ponderosa Park! I hope this is not true. I think data needs to be collected, shared then a decision revisited? Maybe you have already collected data and I just have not seen it?

1. Has there been a count taken on “city deer” over the last 10 years? Has their population really increased or are they being pushed into concentrated areas because of our growth and all of the lots being filled in by housing?

2. How many out of the total population are diseased? Is it 2 or 200?

3. How many man made feeding stations are there around the city?

Thank you for your time. :)"

195 6/24/21 2:16:06 Jett Newell 70 Atkin Lane Cascade, Idaho 83611 Against "Relocating" town deer is expensive in a time when local workers cannot even find housing, and this is what you are choosing to concentrate on? Ridiculous. I am against this proposal.

196 6/24/21 2:13:40 Donna Trout 2379 North World Cup Way Eagle Idaho 83616 Against I am against the trapping, relocation & euthanization of the McCall Idaho deer.

197 6/24/21 3:28:24 Jennifer Poncia Ragsdale 1010 Bitterroot Dr. McCall, ID. 83616 Against "Hello, I hope this message finds you well. I am absolutely against the trapping, euthanizing, relocating or any other such measure which could possibly bring harm to our town deer. I truly believe there is a different way, a better way. I can not imagine looking out my kitchen window and

Page 23 of 46

not seeing the mamas, babies and bucks we have seen for 12 years now. I’m honestly in shock that this is even on the table.

Sincerely,

Jenn R. "

198 6/24/21 5:26:18 Kathy Dillon 412 S Voyage Ave Caldwell ID 83605 Against I am completely against moving and especially euthanizing these beautiful animals who have done nothing wrong. Why would you want to change what brings beauty and uniqueness in to your wonderful city of McCall.

199 6/24/21 5:32:49 Erin Roland 10502 Galloway rd Middleton Id 83644 Against I have lived in Idaho my whole life. I travel to McCall to see the wildlife. If it’s taken away why would I come see McCall or bring revenue? Do not get rid of the wildlife. That is the reason I go to the mountains.

200 6/24/21 5:45:52 100 percent against this 1075 club rd Against Completely against

201 6/24/21 6:03:44 Rich Wright 233 Ernesto, McCall Against I do not support euthanizing city deer.

202 6/24/21 6:04:19 Dwight Peterson 233 Ernesto Dr, McCall, ID 83638 Against This is barbaric. The deer in McCall are one of the things that make McCall such a beautiful place. They provide excitement whenever they come along to say high, and to kill them all is just wrong. I do feel that there should be a law against feeding them, as that is when they could become troublesome. In my years in McCall I have never felt that the deer are a problem on my property, so I absolutely DO NOT SUPPORT this!!! These gentle creatures shouldn’t have to pay the ultimate price for living their life.

203 6/24/21 6:00:58 Katie Hudson 423 Colorado street Against "Against euthanization. Instead, measures need to be taken to enforce people to stop feeding the deer, this is attracting large amounts to locations in town where they normally wouldn't feel comfortable coming. It's all about balance, there are more humans in McCall these days, meaning more traffic and more accidents are prone to happen. An accident involving a deer in town is highly unlikely to be their fault or caused by them, the speed limits need to be followed and overall awareness of the wildlife we share our home with. Yes, I hate that the deer eating my plants but this is their home just as much as mine. Like already stated, we have created this problem by feeding and attracting them. It is unnatural and if we set rules to stop it, they will likely venture out to find food and shelter. It is easy to coexist, let's put in the effort. Control the tourist's actions that are affecting our community. Stop feeding the town deer and slow down!

Another thought, stop development! Put a cap on development because natural areas are being cleared out forcing animals/wildlife from their homes...."

204 6/24/21 6:14:05 Ilene Stittsworth 4043 N Buckboard Way. Boise Idaho Against Wildlife was in your area first. It is their home. Due to excessive building and infringement on THEIR territory you should be the nuisance. Leave them alone. Overbuilding overselling land greed. That about sums it up. It used to be beautiful to drive to McCall. Not anymore wall to wall traffic and housing from Boise to McCall.

Page 24 of 46

205 6/24/21 6:17:56 Doug Huntley 13764 Clear View Ct. Against "I'm 74, live in Lake Fork, but am tied to a downtown business. I've been living close to or visiting McCall my whole life and can't believe how bad the decisions are that are being made to change McCall the last several years. The issue to eliminate deer from the town is absolutely not in the best interest of anyone who enjoys the local area. Total against this!"

206 6/24/21 6:40:20 Robert West 10227 W. Twisted Vine Drive, Star, ID 83669 Against We visit McCall often to visit relatives and enjoy nature and wildlife. Removing deer from McCall would be a horrendous mistake and they truly are NOT a nuisance. Please do not pass this measure.

207 6/24/21 6:45:22 Jennifer Smith 304 McBride Unit# 102 Against "I am against the trapping, relocating and euthanizing of the town deer of McCall.

Thank you in advance for taking the time to consider my stance as a long time resident of McCall.

Jennifer Smith

208.315.5571"

208 6/24/21 6:54:27 Mary Tucker 447 Allen McCall ID 83638 Against We all need to slow down and enjoy the wild life. I agree that education is needed how we can live together. But…. They were here first!

209 6/24/21 6:50:42 Leila Kerschensteiner 953 N Etheridge Pl Boise Idaho 83704 Against I'm a native Idahoan, and I am shocked and horrified that this would even come up as a suggestion for the city of McCall. Stop this travesty now! Seeing deer within the city limits of McCall is not a nuisance. It's called nature at it's finest and most beautiful form! It's what makes McCall, McCall! You must not pass this ordinance. It will be a sad day for McCall and the state of Idaho if you do.

210 6/24/21 6:57:21 James Boley 53 Jughandle Drive, McCall, Idaho 83638 Against I am against the Fish & Game proposal to relocate and/or euthanize the town deer population. It goes against the very nature of our community and why I chose to live in McCall.

211 6/24/21 7:03:54 Mary Stevens 9434 Grasty Gold Mine Road Against Every time humans mess with the balance of nature (lots of coyote because we got rid of wolves) there are always bad results. Discourage people from feeding but leave things alone. We are in their territory, we need to learn to live with them...

212 6/24/21 7:07:39 Rocky Paulson 624 Ruby St McCall ID 83638 Against "Leave them alone.

KTVB, KBOI well being out to you!"

213 6/24/21 7:10:44 Lorraine Hunter 954 Settlement Ave Middleton ID 83644 Against Leave the wildlife alone!! They're a huge part of McCall's charm. Bad idea to remove them...

214 6/24/21 7:15:19 Crystal Deelstra 2832 E Tiber Dr Against This is not what Idaho represents.

215 6/24/21 6:49:35 Kelli Day 409 N Samson Trl McCall Idaho Against Please do not get rid of the town deer! I know they can be a nuisance at times but it is something so unique and

Page 25 of 46 special about McCall. I have visitors all the time talking about how cool they are and even myself and my family love them as full time McCall residents. Just yesterday I was out for a run and thought to myself how special and lucky I am to live in a place that I can regularly pass wildlife on my morning run. The day before that they came up and were "playing" with our cat which was so fun to watch. Our 1 and 3 year old love seeing them out our windows when they're walking through our yard.

216 6/24/21 7:24:53 Cathy Thayer 5060 Highway 72 New Plymouth I'd 83655 Against we visit in McCall frequently one of the things we love are seeing the deer by removing killing them,You remove some of the ambience of visiting there. Don't commercialize it anymore than you already have.

217 6/24/21 7:25:45 Kayla Riggs McCall Idaho 83638 Against I am against the proposed plan of trapping, transporting, and/ or the killing of the McCall town deer.

218 6/24/21 7:22:22 Gina Thruston 109 E. Kerby, Cascade, ID Against I am totally against this proposal! It's one thing to prohibit feeding in the city limits but it's a sad shame that you would want to remove the animals or "KILL" the animals to lesson the nuisance to the city. For the majority of the people who visit McCall or live in McCall and surrounding areas, they do so because of nature and the wildlife and love to see them upon their visits to your city of which I'm sure they spend plenty of money doing so. You are taking away a learning experience for the children as well as not many children have a chance to experience the joy of seeing an animal such as this. I've seen many, many, many pictures from visitors, residents of your City and mine posting the joy of seeing these animals and how excited their family was that they could experience this during their visit. This is part of living in the Mountains, people have a choice, if they don't like what comes with Mountain living then either don't visit or sell your home and move to the City!

219 6/24/21 7:31:03 Jo anne Busch 2205E. Linden #42, Caldwell, ID 83605 Against "I agree with the people who want this deer to live, she has visited for short period over many years abd causes no or minimal problems. I do not approve of removing all the deer in McCall."

220 6/24/21 7:35:47 Aemilia Harper 2720 Tanglewood Pl, Nampa ID 83687 Against Removing the deer that live near McCall and come into town would be inhumane at BEST. Please consider letting them stay and live their lives uninterrupted by your need to make McCall a resort town, instead of the small mountain getaway town it currently is.

221 6/24/21 7:39:43 Joani Labrousse 13816 Shadow Rdg, McCall, ID 83638 Against We need our wildLIFE in McCall.

222 6/24/21 7:42:08 Patrick Cusick 7207 W Swift Ln, Boise, ID 83704 Against Encroaching on deer habitat has caused this problem, along with human-caused climate change. Culling deer isn't the answer. Managing growth and carbon emissions is.

223 6/24/21 7:45:56 Carin Gholson 4701 Collister Against Relocate or euthanize the deer??? HORRIBLE idea!!! I'm VERY much against this!!! We have overtaken their habitat! Let them be!!!

224 6/24/21 7:48:39 Ann M. Cowher 10332 Utahna Rd. Boise, Id. 83714 Against I only wish I was as lucky on a daily basis to see Gods creatures roaming free. And to think mama feels secure

Page 26 of 46 enough to have her babies there is fantastic in itself. Leave alone what God has created and the way He takes care of them.

225 6/24/21 7:55:18 Penny owens 1237 6th ave s payette id Against Do not harm our beautiful wildlife

226 6/24/21 7:57:10 Melissa Courtright 2602 College ave caldwell idaho 83605 Against I am against this happening, leave the wildlife alone to wander and come in town, we come to McCall to see the wildlife absolutely love seeing the deer especially. If people dont like it they can go move to the city with no wildlife.

227 6/24/21 7:52:45 John Fawcett 1340 Ridgeway Lane, McCall, Idaho 83638 Against "I love seeing the deer and they are definitely a tourist attraction and a vital part of our ecosystem. When our family and friends visit they love taking pictures of the deer, foxes, raccoons and squirrels! We fortunately live in the wilderness. Home for all of us! Why would anyone want to kill them? I have been coming to McCall since About 1950, I am a hunter, and the deer were living here way before any of us. We have and can coexist.

In the future as wild animals wander in will you kill them too? Who started this insane idea? Vote no.

Sincerely The Fawcett Family!"

228 6/24/21 8:06:33 Jeremy Courtright 2602 college ave caldwell idaho Against I am very against this proposal to get deer and other wildlife out of town leave them alone, its nature, mccall is in the middle of nature, stop trying to control the local wildlife.

229 6/24/21 8:08:23 Annette Charles 305 east lake street Neutral I think relocation is ok if it can be done with minimal harm to the deer. Not a fan of euthanizing them.

230 6/24/21 8:11:27 Christopher Culler 53 chase drive McCall, Idaho 83638 Against You’re all insane if you think euthanizing deer because they make their way into town is ok!! Where does it stop!? How far would you go!? We’re in the mountains!!! Deer will always be in town! That is part of why people fall in love with this place!! Quit being so ridiculous!!!

231 6/24/21 8:15:54 Wendy McClellin [email protected] Against I am against this ordinance

232 6/24/21 8:16:13 Dreena tabor 2962 w. Mark Dr. Sarasota Florida 34232 Against The animals were here first and they are precious. We need to protect them, not destroy them. The world would not be worth living in if the only life was human.

233 6/24/21 8:14:37 Arthur Alyanakian 1035 Monte Vista Ave. Los Banos, Ca. 93635 Against "Please consider the deer as a positive tourism attraction that enhances your community. Find a considerate solution to any problems. Thank you."

234 6/24/21 8:26:02 Julie Warwick 107 South 13th Ave, Caldwell, ID 83605 Against The new wildlife law you are considering would severely impact the way folks experience McCall and nature. I go to McCall and the surrounding areas often and one of the highlights of our trips is always seeing nature, and most especially deer, living in harmony with people. McCall is a wild and beautiful place and

Page 27 of 46

the deer add to the attraction. Please don't pass this law to trap, relocate and/or euthanize the deer that are just trying to live where they always have.

235 6/24/21 8:23:23 Tessi Lindley 2609 Northside Road Homedale Idaho 83628 Against I live near the Owyhee Mountains (not next to, but near) and we also get deer in our yard occasionally. We cannot relocate or eliminate all the deer every time they go into someones yard, not here, in McCall, or anywhere else.. This stands true for other animals as well. I would think people would have learned from past experience that when you remove a part of a food chain it can have far more serious consequences later (any one remember the "bunny bashing" caused by the coyotes population being almost eliminated in various places?) If they (the animals) are a danger or pose a health risk, then that is a difference scenario. If people don't want other animals in their yard they need to put up appropriate fences to keep them out.

236 6/24/21 8:22:31 Lisa Schneider 2946 Syringa Dr. New Meadows Idaho 83654 Against We have been coming to this area for years before moving here 5 yrs. Ago. The wildlife is a major part of its charm. I have no problem with the rule of not feeling the wildlife but killing the deer or removing them because they don't behave the way certain folks think is appropriate seems very harsh. Humans and wildlife have coexisted forever and adaptations from both sides are often made. Is that such a bad thing? We love our deer and McCall would not be the same without them. So sad to see our area go the way of large population areas where every inconvenience of nature is removed.

237 6/24/21 8:22:07 Mark Dooley 258 Ernesto McCall, ID. 83638 Against "In reading the proposed ordinance and the reference to people having garbage and other to ""lure, attract and entice"" wildlife. Grease is garbage and I would like to see grease added to the list of items to attract wildlife, in this case bears. Common practice to use grease to ""bait bears"" during hunting season and any person or business who has an abundance of grease disposed of outside their property should be fined until the situation is remedied. This is specifically related to Lardos. They are the only commercial kitchen in town with such a nasty mess behind their building, not even sure it meets city or health code. This results in the direct correlation of the bear population in Rio Vista. Fish and Game had to kill an aggressive bear in Rio Vista 2 -3 years ago. That is much more dangerous to people and pets than the deer are and I would like to see that problem addressed in this ordinance.

I don't agree with the term ""Habituated...... Otherwise living within city limits - outside their normally wild habitat"". Our city was built within their habitat. McCall failed the wildlife through the years by allowing developments to take place without providing for habitat preservation and preservation of natural migration patterns. The result of the City failing to develop in an appropriate manner to work with and preserve nature is to blame the wildlife.

I worked for the Government for 15 years in the planning, annexation and development side and know this has already been decided. You wont change or remove the definition for Habituated I hope you will address the real issue with Lardos and the grease leading to the direct attraction of bears living in my neighborhood.

Thank you

Mark Dooley "

Page 28 of 46

238 6/24/21 8:40:09 Kelly Paananen 2021 N. 16th St. Boise Id 83702 Against How do you even consider them "city deer" when McCall is in the Forest?

239 6/24/21 8:39:20 Ann Pruitt 1521 Shadowbrook Drive Keller, texas 76248 Against It makes me SICK that I have to take a minute to save the life of a mama deer that is harming NO ONE. If any of you are GREATER THAN THE GOD WHO CREATED HER and gave her the RIGHT TO LIFE-- then YOU take the life of that deer and YOU take the consequences! God said "Wo unto him that wasteth flesh and hath no need"--- If we can't have compassion on the helpless in our society, then we are all doomed. Save the deer and MOVE ON to something that REALLY MATTERS in your community!

240 6/24/21 8:41:19 Deborah Moreno 829 W Riverstone Ct, Nampa, ID 83686 Against Against the removal of wildlife in town. It is one of the reasons we enjoy going to the lake and spending time in the area.

241 6/24/21 8:43:28 Val Olsen 792 Amy Court Boulder City, NV Against The deer are part of McCall's charm. We expect to see them in the mountain communities. Expect tourism to go down. Its not always about the residents.

242 6/24/21 8:39:47 Kristy Enbysk 904 N. Imperial Way, Boise, Idaho 83704 Against I am completely against this!!! As an Idahoan, the fact that we have wildlife so close to us is simply a blessing!! For decades, our family has loved seeing these gorgeous creatures outside our windows and love being able to observe their gentle nature. Whoever decided that this proposal was a good idea needs to move away to somewhere else where everything is concrete and developments!! Shame on you, City of McCall and Idaho Fish and Game for entertaining this absurd notion!!! You should be embarrassed and apologize to the people who live here and visit, bringing $$ to McCall. We come to enjoy Idaho and all it has to offer…… including the deer that our grandkids get to watch when we’re there.

243 6/24/21 8:51:17 Mike Sorensen 905 Pennfield Place, Caldwell, Idaho Against Stop this NOW! This is a ridiculous proposal and should have been shut down before it ever even started. The deer in McCall as a big part of what visitors and folks that live in McCall LOVE about being there. McCall has the perfect blend of everything, including the deer. The person who proposed this should be removed from office - clearly they don’t have the citizens and visitors that bring money into the city. Boo!

244 6/24/21 8:57:09 Stacey Hansen 308 S 230 W Jerome ID 83338 Against I oppose, this is such a heartless ordinance.

245 6/24/21 8:59:46 Margo Wyman 1607 Brooklawn, McCall, Idaho Against This is the wrong thing to do. Most visiting McCall live the wildlife. We have had a "mama" and her fawns in our back yard for many, many years and they are not a nuisance, to the contrary, they add to the uniqueness of McCall. Don't change our town....it is a HUGE mistake.

246 6/24/21 9:04:07 Robin Gerblick 2010 University Lane Pondersosa Park Against "

I, and many, many others in McCall are NOT in favor of this ridiculous ordinance.

We are against this proposal for obvious reasons:

Page 29 of 46

1. The research from neighboring States (WA, UT, OR, MT, WY) Fish and Game departments have shown that less than 50% of the deer survive such a ""relocation"" program, and that the cost is $600 to $900 PER DEER (in 2014 dollars).

2. We live here for a reason. For the wilderness, which is rapidly disappearing before our eyes. For the wildLIFE. For the absolute privilege and blessing it is to live Among the Wildlife (deer, bear, fox, coyotes, cougars, moose, squirrels, ground squirrels, Ravens, Steller's Jays). They all have their own unique behavior and language...it is an incredible blessing to witness daily from my home here inside the Park.

But if the City of McCall and Fish and Game have their way, they will ALL be gone next year. All. It is a drastic, draconian measure we will never be able to recover from.

Can you even imagine coming to McCall, in the Mountains of the Great State of Idaho and NEVER seeing a live, wild deer again? Ever?

Even in Ponderosa STATE PARK?

What a true travesty that would be that our children, grandchildren and visitors were never able to see a wild deer here in our beautiful town.

Once fully eradicated, we cannot come back.

""Removal"" of the ""town deer"" that are *such* a ""nuisance"" may ""sound nice"", but what they are talking about is the trapping, transport OR killing of ALL of McCall's ""town deer'.

No matter that they live in Ponderosa State Park. No matter that they do the ""right thing"" and migrate to lower climes at times and come back. No matter what their age. No matter if they separate Mama from her young.

You get the picture.

It's a travesty and Draconian measure at best. "

247 6/24/21 9:09:51 Brittney Jones 6670 S Santa Ana Ave, Boise ID, 83709 Against I am against the proposed wildlife ordinance for many reasons. As an Idaho native I think it is a shame that we build a town in the middle of a forrest and expect wildlife to conform to our demands. They were there first. McCall is known for its wildlife which is one of the reasons why the town is a state treasure. Please don’t pass the ordinance.

248 6/24/21 9:10:03 Mindy Miller 404 Virginia blvd Against I agree we need to stop feeding the wildlife but do not agree to get rid of them. These animals have been a part of our community for generations and are part of what makes McCall so special.

249 6/24/21 9:09:13 Helen Timothy 2450 Old Sharlie Lane, McCall, Idaho 83638 Against Wildlife makes McCall unique and that is why we love having our cabin there. If the deer population was diseased then I could understand it but there is no evidence to that fact. I guess you could consider bears a nuisance too but there is no proposal to relocate or euthanize them.

250 6/24/21 9:18:33 Ryan North 249 Moonridge Dr, McCall, ID 83638 Against "I am against trapping, relocating or otherwise removing deer.

Page 30 of 46

If AB-168 were limited to making feeding of wildlife illegal then that would have been an entirely different matter. As it stands, AB-168 reached too far. "

251 6/24/21 9:21:38 Deanna Thomas 4405 West Saint Andrews Boise Against Save the wildlife!!

252 6/24/21 9:14:18 Mary Kolbet 10383 W Cory St. Boise. Id Against "I have been coming to McCall for over 60 years and have seen it grow from the small mountain town with small cabins and friendly people to a small town with oversized houses and out of staters who just aren’t as friendly it seems.

Anyway, enough of that.

Please, please don’t pass all of this ordinance. I don’t mind the no feeding but please don’t pass the rest of it. The deer, elk, and other wildlife were there long before us humans. If those who find it a nuisance don’t like the deer on their property let them be moved.

Please please please don’t pass this. I love seeing the wildlife when I come to McCall. "

253 6/24/21 9:23:00 Makeesha boyum 115 s ivy St nampa id 83686 Against If wildlife is a nuisance then people should not be visiting a wildlife get away, taking innocent animals and relocating them to die to benefit rich yuppies who are moving to our beautiful state and taking away what we love about it is not ok. And those who proposed this bill with no regard that half of the relocated wildlife would probably die should be ashamed of themselves. Keep idaho beautiful and keep idaho wild.

254 6/24/21 9:34:39 RyAnn Mager 18947 Middleton Rd Nampa Idaho 83687 Against I am against this wildlife ordinance I think it will be detrimental to the natural wildlife in and around McCall

255 6/24/21 9:36:20 Tyler Mager 18947 Middleton Rd Nampa Idaho 83687 Against I am against this wildlife ordinance

256 6/24/21 9:35:08 Ron and Joni Korthals 90 Ridgeview Road, Donnelly, ID Against Not allowing wildlife in McCall would be a travesty and just one more reason for people to detest out-of-state newcomers. If we wanted to live in a barren wildlife-less place, we can move to the big city! Don't mess with what we have!

257 6/24/21 9:25:17 Pamela Eskelin Reichel 7905 152nd St. Ct. East, Puyallup, WA 98375 Against I am AGAINST the local Fish and Game's agenda/proposal to trap, remove, euthanize ALL of the town deer in McCall, due to them being a "Nuisance". This is a terrible idea! I spent many summers and winters as a child visiting McCall and was outraged to even hear of such an awful idea! The wildlife are there to be enjoyed and protected. Shame on you for even thinking of such a horrific plan! Fish and Game promotes their "Project Wild" program to children which encourages the appreciation of wildlife, something you should consider! The deer have not invaded and are a nuisance, people are!!

258 6/24/21 9:45:39 Malee Thomas 19114 Galloway rd Caldwell I'd. 83607 Against You are living in their home . Most people love being close to nature it brings tourists and if you choose to live

Page 31 of 46 there it is part of the beauty. The tax payers should not be funding relocation when we moved into their homes.

259 6/24/21 9:51:01 Wendy Loomis 16 Usher Drive Against I'm against this!

260 6/24/21 9:49:56 Paul Thomas 19114 Galloway rd Caldwell Is. 83607 Against Not something we should be doing to justify a job. Other things are in desperate need of supervision not deer in town, who are a tourist draw card

261 6/24/21 9:47:37 Lisa Durning 22753 Zephyr Ct Caldwell, ID 83607 Against I am against removing wildlife from McCall city limits. People that are moving into this area need to coexist with local wildlife. This is their home, and the mountains around McCall have been their home for longer than the existing homes. My husband and I also own property in Cascade, as well as in Caldwell. We bought our property in Valley County knowing full well we would be sharing it with all of the local wildlife. That means we accept the positive aspects of seeing and enjoying wildlife, along with their natural behaviors, which might not always be positive. It’s not right to eradicate wildlife just because they are a “nuisance”.

262 6/24/21 9:59:18 Helen Powers 1503 Roosevelt Ave., McCall, ID. 83638 Against Deer were here first, we are just borrowing the space, feed them if you want or not, not your place to decide who stays and who goes, you are only here for a period of time.

263 6/24/21 9:59:48 Chris Reichert 908 Specht Ave CALDWELL idaho 83605 Against Wildlife have been in and around McCall for YEARS and NOW you want to mess up the natural order of the animals for what?!?!?! They're habitat was crowded into in order for McCall to even be built in the mountains, but you didn't see them throwing a fit and organizing meetings to have humans removed from their area!!! Dont over take nature if you dont want nature to be in your backyard!!!! 100000% AGAINST THIS IDIOTIC MOVEMENT!!!!!!!!!!!

264 6/24/21 10:05:01 Angela Shoecraft 2341 Hill rd Boise, ID 83702 Against The reason people escape to the mountains it to be with wildlife and now they want to kill them because they are an inconvenience? I am against the trapping, relocating and euthanizing of the town deer of McCall.

265 6/24/21 10:15:35 Kendall Northcutt 423 Floyde St McCall ID 83638 Against The deer are a magical part of McCall!! It is human error, not the fault of the deer. Please, please, please do not euthanize.

266 6/24/21 10:14:23 Brenda Jansson 8958 W Candleston ct boise idaho Against Sorry the deer are such a nuisance to you but WE like them here. And just in case you didn't know, WE are encroaching on THEIR land, NOT the other way around. I'm sure the Native Americans felt the same way when they were targeted for being a 'Nuisance'.

267 6/24/21 9:58:47 Destiny Platt 12685 Hereford Rd, Donnelly, ID 83615 Against I am in agreement with not feeding the wildlife. However I am completely against relocating or euthanizing wildlife under the guise of being a nuisance in their own habitat. People who choose to move to the mountains should fully expect interactions with local wildlife. If they are unhappy with this then they can

Page 32 of 46 move to a more populated city that is further away from wildlife. Alaska does not euthanize or relocate their local wildlife simply for being around humans and within city limits. McCall shouldn't either.

268 6/24/21 10:16:24 Kim Mitchell 12650 wild rose lane Nampa id 83686 Against With all new housing, wildlife are being weeded out as it is. Totally against

269 6/24/21 10:22:19 Zoe Metcalf 11515 w Silverview st boise Idaho Against Please do not remove wildlife

270 6/24/21 10:21:28 Karen Hancock 1209 E Dewey Ave Nampa, ID 83686 Against I am incredibly against this happening. Wildlife should be preserved, not eradicated for being a “nuisance.”

271 6/24/21 10:09:13 Madison Hamilton 949 E Travel Ln, Kuna Idaho Against “Animals should NOT require our permission to live on earth. Animals were given the right to be here long before we arrived”. - Anthony Douglas Williams

272 6/24/21 10:31:19 Karen and James Bouden 5895 Ensign Ave. Against We are against the removal of town deer!!! This is their home! People are the ones that need to make adjustments to our lives to help them!!! Removing, separating families , or killing them is cruel!!! It is the same thing as removal of people SHAME SHAME SHAME on those thinking of doing this! I was born in Idaho and it is unique and beautiful Which includes getting to see our wildlife and enjoy it!

273 6/24/21 10:34:36 LaDessa Foster 12681 Hereford Against "I have been coming to our family property in Valley County since the mid 1960s. As humans we have encroached on wildlife habitats. Leave the deer alone. The are not predatory and cause no harm to humans. There is no reason to euthanize them! They are part of living in the Idaho mountains. Families living in McCall and Valley County for generations love seeing them. I have observed the joy in others seeing them for the first or hundredth time.

Thank you!"

274 6/24/21 10:41:02 Darla Weekes 5815 Oak St Nampa ID Against My family vacations up there every year! One of the most enjoyable experiences for the adults and our kids is to watch the deer... I cannot understand why anyone would think this is okay! If you don't like nature then you should move to the city!!! Please don't do this!!!

275 6/24/21 10:48:47 Leila Farley 902 N. Imperial Way, Boise, Idaho 83704 Against What a horrible thing to consider. Stop this nonsense! The deer are one of the amenities that make McCall special. Let’s eradicate the people that came up with this stupid idea!

276 6/24/21 10:55:33 Christy Schill-Newbold 601 East Ash Street Caldwell Idaho Against Against removing the natural wildlife from McCall. One of the most beautiful experiences in our State is being near wildlife especially the deer.

277 6/24/21 11:00:10 Cathy Jasperson P O Box 412, McCall, ID Against I DO NOT want this ordinance. There are ways to coexist with these beautiful creatures.

278 6/24/21 10:53:03 karen Bouden 5895 Ensign Ave. Garden City Idaho 83714 Against I wrote a comment earlier But I forgot to include my city in my address section. And want to be sure you include it and read it. This is a cruel proposal! taking wildlife from their homes that they have

Page 33 of 46 lived in for ever. to relocate them to an area they are not familiar with and to separate families or kill them. Reminds me of the removal of jews!!! We are living in their home! People are the ones that need to make adjustments to live with the deer. I was born here. We need to keep Idaho unique and beautiful with all of its wildlife! McCall has been my playground for all of my life! I do not want to see it without Deer!!!

279 6/24/21 10:59:33 Scott Thibodeau 626 Syringa a Dr Against My in-laws. And. I own a vacation home in McCall this will be my wife and I retirement home we love McCall for the wild life. Including the deer this matter will change the mountain feel of McCall

280 6/24/21 11:02:27 Lannie Davis 9850 W. Westview Against "I am against this this happening.

281 6/24/21 10:59:15 Shannon Ochoa 14183 Hancock Rd. McCall Against We’ve been here for 20 years. We enjoy the wildlife. We never complained about the deer and we never hear any complaints. Tourists enjoy seeing the wildlife.

282 6/24/21 11:03:53 Lynn Wayne 2068 John Alden Against Seeing the deer and wildlife around our homes is an important part of the McCall experience. PLEASE do NOT remove and kill these beautiful deer!

283 6/24/21 10:44:25 Jenny Fawcett 1340 Ridgeway Lane Against The deer in town have been here for a long time and they will continue to come into town - feeding the wildlife or not. We live in their habitat. Education is important. Killing/transporting is an outlandish/cruel idea. Someone has taken a very myopic view of what “they” think should be done with the deer. Is this job justification for F&G? Nothing better to do? I am nearing 70 and I have seen a lot of foolish things “accomplished” by F&G. Many years ago someone with F&G had the brilliant idea to introduce mackinaw into Payette Lake. We no longer can catch silver sides or trout to levels in the past. Re-introduction of a specific species of wolf? Really? Unless you are out in areas where you can see the damage to elk herds from wolves one will not understand. There are other towns and cities that have taken a much more realistic approach to dealing with the wildlife in their human inhabited areas. Learn from them before you make such a harsh decision that will have long term effects on our way of life here. Spray some deer fence on your flowers - don’t kill the deer.

284 6/24/21 11:09:10 Vicky Perez 13496 S Hall Topock, AZ 86436 Against As former owner of property next to the Park I never had any problems with the deer!! As for drivers thats another story!! Slow down, view the wildlfe!!!!

285 6/24/21 11:11:36 Cathy Mosman 155 E Lake Fork Rd#1941 McCall ID 8363 For I support the proposal.

286 6/24/21 11:16:00 Julie Warwick 107 South 13th Avenue, Caldwell, ID 83605 Against I understand that a yes vote on the not feeding wild animals will also result in Fish and Game beginning the gathering and relocation or euthanization of animals. This is completely unacceptable! Obviously this was the animals home first! We visit McCall often and part of the reason is that we can see so many different beautiful animals in such close proximity to town. It would be unconscionable to

Page 34 of 46 remove them from their homes. Please do not pass the ordinance regarding the feeding of wild animals. Thank you.

287 6/24/21 11:10:50 Sara Powell Floyd St Against "I can not believe that you would just euthanize an animal for being in city limits when McCall was and is in a forest area… these animals natural habitats for years.

How many cities do you know that currently do this. Seems very inhuman and a lazy way to “fix” this problem. Perhaps they need relocated further into the forest rather than just put down.

This is no different than moving next to an established ball park or golf course and complaint about the balls coming in their yard or the noise of cheering fans.

None of this seems like a good solution the animals, but rather your easy fix.

I hope you reconsider this option and perhaps look for a different solution than just euthanasia. "

288 6/24/21 11:15:37 Benita and Alan Giltzow 199 Hazel Place Donnelly, Idaho 83615 Against We are against the eradication of town deer and any other animals by the City Council and Fish and Game! Are dogs and cats next?

289 6/24/21 11:24:36 Lisa Wood PO Box 1836, McCall ID 83638 Against Please leave our town deer alone. We can co exist with education. I oppose any use of taxpayers $$ to be used in any way eradicate the town deer.

290 6/24/21 11:25:12 Ashlea Gray 22 Timberline Drive Donnelly ID 83615 Against My name is Ashlea Gray and I’m a 3rd generation McCall native. I am against the trapping, relocating, and euthanizing of the town deer. If this goes throw it would be a devastation to the animals and the people alike.

291 6/24/21 11:12:29 Linda Estes 1508 W Colorado Ct Nampa ID 83686 Against People travel to McCall not only for the lake and it beauty but to have a chance for a first hand experience of enjoying the wildlife as well. How many children would not have this opportunity?? Councilmen and women would you deprive you grandchildren of this opportunity? I think not!! My husband and I are not boaters however when we travel up north and see a deer it becomes a successful trip.

292 6/24/21 11:29:31 Barbara Brown 1533 Warren Wagon Rd Against Against this proposal

293 6/24/21 10:56:24 Julie Conrad 1423 Eagle Drive McCall, ID 83638 PO Box 2755 McCall, ID 83638 Against "I voted NO last week and again this week regarding the ""No-Feed"" Ordinance. After attending the city council meeting in person on June 10th I am vehemently opposed to this ordinance being voted on and/or passed at today's meeting or in the future.

The City has NOT been transparent with the apparent Fact that a ""Yes"" Vote on the No-Feed Ordinance is a Death Sentence For All Deer In and Around McCall. Regardless of whether the deer are in town, in Ponderosa State Park, in Bear Basin, on Brundage Mountain, in Jug Mountain Ranch, in Blackhawk on the River, in RiverRanch, no matter if the deer do the ""right thing"" and migrate in/out, up or down from McCall.

Page 35 of 46

What you DID NOT TELL THE PUBLIC is that a ""Yes"" Vote will start a horrific Train Reaction giving local Fish and Game the ""Go-Ahead"" to immediately start the process to eradicate all town deer.

This is a irreprehensible, uneducated and short-sided decision that You UNILATERALLY are making For ALL OF US, that will not only affect those of us who live here and call McCall home but those generations to come. Including 2nd homeowners, visitors and tourists.

The First step MUST BE for the City Council to TABLE the no-feed ordinance and tell Fish and Game to STAND DOWN.

There are so many more pressing problems and issues in McCall that need the attention of our City ""Leaders"". The deer by far, are LAST on the list.

Who is so strongly spear-heading this and WHY? And why so suddenly?

Follow the POWER OR THE MONEY and you will typically always find out.

Fish and Game? Local Police? Local City Manager? Local City Mayor?

Which of them grew up here? Which have spent their childhood years into adult years here enjoying all McCall has to offer and the sheer beauty and magic and PRIVILEGE of living among the deer and other wildlife? Are they really OK with forever altering the beauty and magic of McCall? For EVERYONE? To what end?

Who are they playing to?

I highly doubt any of them will want to brag to their children, grandchildren and future generations that ""THEY WERE RESPONSIBLE FOR KILLING ALL OF THE TOWN DEER"". Is THAT the legacy they want to leave? Blood on their hands? And WHY?

Do our City Council Members, City Manager and City Mayor Actually even KNOW that if they pass the no-feed ordinance that Fish and Game will immediately begin the eradication process (euthanization of ALL TOWN DEER)?? Are they actually OK with that?

If they DON'T Know Or Understand This, then WE need to ask, demand that they ALL STAND DOWN.

McCall has ALWAYS been a sanctuary for humans and wildlife alike. Please do not “City-fi” and pave over and alter forever the last vestiges of this beautiful MOUNTAIN town. We LIVE in the mountains for the wilderness experience. We live here because we CAN co-exist with the deer and other wildlife. We live here because is NOT Boise or any other large concrete city. We are going down a very horrid path we can never return from. Once it’s gone, once the deer are gone, this magic, this beauty is GONE FOREVER.

I urge you to DO THE RIGHT THING. Table this ordinance AND vote, and step back to re-evaluate what you are doing.

We NEED to preserve McCall. The deer BELONG TO ALL OF US."

294 6/24/21 11:34:16 Cindy Boyce 1531 McCall Ave. McCall, Idaho 83638 For Please stop feeding the animals. Please DO NOT relocate them.

Page 36 of 46

295 6/24/21 11:28:41 Kelcey Gentry 711 N 6th St Parma, Idaho 83660 Against For years my family have visited McCall multiple times a year, with family having cabins in different area's around the lake. We come up to be able to enjoy the mountains and watching the deer and fox in our yard! Our favorite memories include waking up in the morning to the baby deer and baby fox wondering in the yard, with momma not to far. As we watch them they always come right up next to the window, as if saying "Good Morning". If our wildlife is removed, we will no longer be able to share this amazing experience with our next generations, it will no longer be an experience we get to have every year, and a big reason we come back to McCall year after year.

296 6/24/21 11:37:58 Niky Hoffman 138 N 17th St wheeling we 26003 Against The absurdity of this should be evident. All life is precious, all of it.

297 6/24/21 11:39:30 Jennifer Thornfeldt 960 Conifer St, McCall, ID 83638 Neutral For the feeding ban. AGAINST killing them or relocating them

298 6/24/21 11:41:38 Tuck Miller PO Box 2002 McCall Idaho Against "Not Natural, Not Sustainable.

The McCall Mayor got it right when he said the situation with deer in McCall is not natural and not sustainable. The endless crush of humanity that is destroying wildlife habitat is absolutely not sustainable and is not natural. McCall and Valley County have joined headlong in the destruction of wildlife habitat with development, activities and roads that are destroying wildlife habitat at an unsustainable rate.

We have a problem with humans not deer. Human development has essentially destroyed all the deer, elk, and antelope wintering habitat in the Treasure Valley. That crush of uncontrolled humanity is now creeping up the hill in Dry Creek and Avimor and Highways 55 and 95 have become Kill Zones for deer, elk, and any other wildlife that wanders onto the roadways. The deer and elk migration corridors are threatened by the continued development of every river corridor in our area and now planned developments, mines and roads will take the rest.

The Police Chief mentions the problem of dead and maimed deer in a town with a 25 mph speed limit. Again, it is not deer that are the problem but the crush of reckless drivers in an armada of vehicles. Oh yes, and dogs at large. Both of these are enforcement issues. As I sit here, watching vehicles running down Lick Creek Road at 50 mph, I wonder where the enforcement is.

Gigantic, energy inefficient homes and endless development not only destroys habitat locally and displaces wildlife but is the root of habitat loss on a global scale. More dams and coal mines for electricity have destroyed the rivers of the West and we have lost salmon and so many of the native fish of the West. These river corridors are now just killing fields for migratory wildlife and gurgle with methylmercury and carp so we can build more houses and more developments.

We have extirpated Sockeye and Chinook Salmon from Payette River and our Lake. Bighorn Sheep and Antelope are long gone around McCall, Columbia Sharptail Grouse, Sage Grouse, Monarch Butterflies, native Trout, Mountain Quail, Mountain Goats, Grizzly Bears, Pronghorn Antelope—all hang by a thread. We cannot count on the Idaho Department of Fish and Game Department to make wise choices here. They have been nothing but a Holding Company for Extermination over the years and are politically

Page 37 of 46 neutered by the State government. One need only review the recent wolf actions by the Fish and Game Department and the State to understand how castrated they are in dealing in wildlife issues.

There has been a 68% loss of wildlife worldwide since 1970. Migratory fish species have declined 72% since 1970. Deal with that Idaho Department of Fish and Game and stop nibbling around the edges and dumping hatchery fish and non-native species into our environment. This is not sustainable and it is not natural.

In a hundred and fifty years, we have lost so many local, iconic species to human development. Now, we think we have a problem with deer in McCall. We have a problem with humans and their greedy tendencies. They are not natural and they are not sustainable—the Mayor is absolutely correct.

We need to do a better job managing ourselves, not deer.

Tuck Miller

McCall, Idaho"

299 6/24/21 11:39:21 Ardis Hewitt 7062 E Los Carneros Drive Boise Against As a former resident for a decade in McCall I’m gobsmacked to learn of this proposal to dispose of the city deer that wander about the community. Are you kidding?? Do not let a minority of anti-wildlife and conservation new residents and homeowners mess with part of the charm and wildlife of McCall.

300 6/24/21 11:32:40 Meredith Carlson 2119 W Bannock St Boise ID, 83702 Against As a born and raised Idahoan and frequent visitor to the area, I am greatly against the removal/destruction of our “nuisance” town deer. Being able to live close to and see the wonderful nature that Idaho has to offer is why we live here.

301 6/24/21 11:45:24 Christine Reino 129 Stibnite #7, McCall, ID 83638 Against Another solution should be sought.

302 6/24/21 11:47:32 Lynne Lawless 635 Samson Trail McCall Idaho 83638 Against I think that it would be more harmful to move the deer. There are other options we can take one being signage about not feeding the wildlife and educating the public rather than moving the deer. I think it would be detrimental to McCall.

303 6/24/21 11:54:13 Pamela Weathers 16865 Bryant Ave., Dos Palos, CA 93620 Against The wildlife is one of the main reasons we maintain a family vacation home in Idaho. Nuisance is one who does damage, intimidates or threatens. To some... anything is a nuisance. The wildlife was here first...and is one of the most attractive things about Idaho. If wildlife is a nuisance perhaps as ps you've chosen the wrong place to live.

304 6/24/21 12:01:56 Joan Whitacre 3300 Whitefield Ln, McCall, ID 83638 Against I am against the proposed wildlife ordinance resulting in any interference, intervention, or control of the wildlife population in the City of McCall. I also consider Ponderosa Park and other State or Federal properties beyond the authority of the City Council of McCall regarding this ordinance.

305 6/24/21 11:39:56 Katie Lynn Strode 814 Carico CRT. For "I grew up here in McCall and the deer have never been so noticeable invasive as they are now and are clearly a Nuisance at restaurant parking lots, and in town blocking the roads a lot of the time.

Page 38 of 46

Folks also need to stop feeding them.

The deer need to be thinned out or gone. They have no natural thinning process in town and have no Predators from what I have seen.

Most mommas have twins so the amount of deer is over loading the city and are getting out of control of eating folks landscape in their yards.

They have chased my dog and attracted it at my front door.

They have attracted my neighbors dog on the leash when she walked down the street.

They will eventually make their way back but for now they are definitely a Nuisance. "

306 6/24/21 12:05:39 Shelly Miiller 3286 S. Norfolk, Boise, Id 83706 Against This seems extreme. How about putting signs up and educating people. It’s not like they are killing peoples dogs and cats or farmers sheep!

307 6/24/21 12:12:22 Shirley duffy 1100 Burnett 358. Nampa,Idaho Against I like to drive to McCall to see some of the wildlife. It's always a surprise to see deer in people's yards or even in tjown.To take this away from humans is insane. These animals have been here long before us and to disrupt the would be cruel. That is my opion

308 6/24/21 12:20:15 Denise McNamee 5171 s Yarrow Ave Boise ID 83716 Against "Wildlife is a draw for tourism in McCall.

This is a very drastic and sad proposal - totally against "

309 6/24/21 11:57:49 Julie Conrad 1423 Eagle Drive McCall, ID 83638 PO Box 2755 McCall ID 83638 Against "We must educate, not eradicate when it comes to McCall town deer

I attended the June 10, 2021, McCall City Council meeting in person to listen and learn more about two “proposals” the City of McCall is currently considering regarding our town deer. The first proposal is putting an ordinance in place making it illegal to feed deer and all wildlife in McCall with the exception of song birds.

The second “proposal” of much more concern due to its draconian measures, is giving Idaho Fish and Game the go-ahead to trap, relocate or euthanize all of our town deer. This will happen if our city council votes on and passes the “illegal to feed wildlife” ordinance.

This will also happen without any public hearing or without any public input by our full-time and part- time residents, taxpayers and visitors/tourists. Unless you speak up now.

I am OK with an ordinance to not feed the deer and wildlife in McCall. I am not OK with the notion of trapping, transporting and/or euthanizing all of the town deer simply due to them being a “nuisance.”

Just yesterday, Mama Deer (who has been giving birth to her fawns in my side yard for 11 consecutive years) and her day-old twins scampered across the fairway on the McCall Golf Course where I am a full- time resident. Golfers, one visiting from Arizona, stopped their play and excitedly exclaimed “Aww, look! Baby fawns! Quick, get a photo”! I simply cannot imagine a McCall without “town deer.” I’ve been

Page 39 of 46

enjoying McCall for 58 years with my family and friends at our family cabins over the years, and there have always been town deer.

Can you imagine being a visitor to Ponderosa State Park in the great state of Idaho and never being able to witness the majestic beauty of a wild deer? They are a part of the fabric of McCall. May as well remove the expensive signage they put throughout the park letting visitors know of the wildlife they are “likely to see” in the park. Or tell them as they enter the park, “Sorry, but to see a wild deer, you will have to go to a big-city zoo.” What a travesty it would be if our children, grandchildren and visitors were never to see a wild deer or fawn in McCall ever again.

What in the world are our city officials thinking? And all due to the deer being a “nuisance?”

After doing considerable research by talking with Fish and Game wildlife biologists, wildlife officers, and wildlife conflict specialists in Idaho as well as our neighboring states of Washington, Utah, and Oregon, we have much to learn. Each had come to the same conclusion, that trapping and relocating deer, known as “translocation,” did not work due to two primary reasons: 1. Over 50% die during or shortly after the transport, and 2. The exorbitant cost ($600 to $900 per deer). If we allow this to happen in McCall, who will be paying for that? Certainly not Idaho Fish and Game? Certainly not the City of McCall? The taxpayers? One wildlife officer said to me “Fish and Game shouldn’t be getting involved at all.” He also said that the “deer belong to all of us” and that one governmental agency should not be allowed to take that from the local residents and visitors.

There are other alternatives that we can consider first before we got down a slippery slope that we can never recover from: 1. If traffic issues are “the most common problem” with our deer, would it not be much more cost effective to actually enforce the speed limit? 2. In the 58 years I have been spending time in McCall and now living here full-time for 12 years, I have not once seen a mountain lion. Have there always been occasional sightings during the winter or spring months? Of course. Towns and cities from neighboring states simply post a general warning about sightings, or capture and re-release the lion vs. eradicating an entire herd of deer.

3. Of course deer sometimes become aggressive toward people and dogs, most often in the spring when they are caring for newborn fawn. Again, why not educate the public on how to live with"

310 6/24/21 12:29:41 Jon Umbdenstock 203 n. Heigho New Meadows, 83654 Against The wildlife is what makes our area special.

311 6/24/21 12:30:53 Julie Conrad 1423 Eagle Drive McCall, ID 83638 PO Box 2755 McCall, ID 83638 Against "(Continued from previous comment submission).

3. Of course deer sometimes become aggressive toward people and dogs, most often in the spring when they are caring for newborn fawn.

All mammals and wildlife are highly protective of their young. Again, why not educate the public on how to live with wildlife as our neighboring states do as well as enforce city off-leash dog laws?

4. The exotic lice species in deer described by F&G does not affect humans or domestic animals. Deer in captive settings have been successfully cleared of lice infestations with the use of medication. Many cases resolve on their own when the deer are in better condition in spring/summer due to increased food resources or with seasonal environmental changes

Page 40 of 46

5. Why not put the no-feed ordinance in place then use a fraction of the funds it would take to trap and move, and put that toward a massive education campaign for locals and visitors alike?

Why are we allowing a handful of people to decide the fate of one of the most endearing traits of McCall by eradicating the local town deer? The deer do indeed belong to All of us. The city has many more pressing problems that it ought to be working on.

I urge our city leaders and city officials to take a big step back before it’s too late, before we can never recover from a very poor decision. Educate, not eradicate.

(Julie Conrad lives in McCall.)"

312 6/24/21 12:32:26 Joanne Conrad 2569E Whitebud Court Meridian, Idaho Against One of the main reasons I travel to McCall is to see the deer. Please don’t remove them as then there will be no reason to go to McCall.

313 6/24/21 12:33:57 Haley Paulsen 24549 Fern Lane Wilder, ID 83676 Against I grew up in McCall - it is a second home for me and I am COMPLETELY AGAINST this! Please leave the deer alone, they are doing no harm!

314 6/24/21 12:32:52 Sandra Stern [email protected] Against My family has been long time property owners, visitors and residents in Valley County and the McCall area. I am against the trapping, relocating, and/or euthanizing of the town deer in the City of McCall. Please remember McCall and people are impeding on the deers natural habitat not the other way around. McCall is a resort town and a mountain community with many new “city” residents and vacationers that do not understand wildlife and are fearful of them or feed them. We as a community need to do a better job through partnerships with Fish and Game and City of McCall’s resources to educate about the deer and other wildlife not eliminate their presence. The deer herds are a beautiful attraction not a distraction. Please do not eliminate the charm of our beloved mountain escape by making it void of the treasures our Idaho mountain communities offer.

315 6/24/21 12:28:05 Marilyn Olson 890 Timber Ridge Ct, McCall, Idaho, 83638 For I support educating the public with a wildlife ordinance against feeding wildlife in the city of McCall. I am against the current proposal to trap and remove the town deer. I think education would be a good place to start and possibly putting more police presence along Davis Street where several deer have been killed due to excessive speed by drivers. Thank you for your time and consideration.

316 6/24/21 12:33:48 Ashlyn Bideganeta 522 E Washakie street Meridian Idaho 83646 Against "Hi there, I would like to very seriously vote no on this proposed plan for the deer and wildlife in the city of McCall. As an Idaho native and someone who’s spent many many summers in the city of McCall, I can say 1st hand that the deer within the city of McCall pose no unnatural threat to campgrounds or public lands when humans act responsibly. Deer live in the mountains and the mountains were there before the town. As they say in Costa Rica, “don’t be a victim” which in this case, means use your brain when it comes to wildlife. Drivers, pedestrians, and all people should take personally responsibility for themselves and their safety around McCall wildlife, specifically deer in this case. Please to not violate the home we so joyfully share with these deer and please do not harm, move or alter the beautiful wildlife, including the deer. in McCall. We do not want restrictions placed on our

Page 41 of 46 interactions with these animals, rather the freedom to use common sense and continue to enjoy the land we share. Thank you and sincerely,

Ashlyn Bideganeta "

317 6/24/21 12:38:55 Michelle Sanders 1500 S. Harmon Rd. Fallon, NV 89406 Against DO NOT KILL THE DEER!!!! THEY ARE A PART OF THE BEAUTY OF MCCALL !!! I VISIT MCALL OFTEN AND THE FIRST THING MY ENTIRE FAMILY LOOK FOR IS THE BEAUTIFUL DEER. AND FOR THE ONES THAT ARE COMPLAINING, THEY NEED TO LEAVE THE AREA!!! # ALL WILDLIFE LIVES MATTER

318 6/24/21 12:44:16 Ina Harts 2333 W Palouse St Against "Wildlife needs to always be preserved, the real nuisance is the public who don't want them to be in their natural surroundings. When visiting McCall and other areas it brings us joy to see deer, elk etc. To take that away then what is the point of coming to McCall!"

319 6/24/21 12:51:14 Keynan Fanslow 13206 S Pine River Way Nampa 83686 Against Do not want to see deer removed from the city!

320 6/24/21 12:50:59 AnnMarie Halverson 1112 Alpine St, McCall, ID 83638 For I have lived here for 8 years, and over the last three years the town deer problem has gotten out of control. It is very obvious (and I am no wildlife expert) that the deer population is not healthy. The fact that people are feeding the deer is only adding to the problem, and it is frustrating that these folks do not see it as a problem. An excessive deer population does not belong in town, especially with the increase in tourism and traffic. The deer are becoming a nuisance and the population needs to be controlled. I am in favor of ticketing people who are found to be feeding the deer.

321 6/24/21 12:59:26 Barbara A Lutz 5208 E Homedale Rd Caldwell idaho 83607 Against It is just a shame that you would go so far as kill or remove all the deer or wildlife from the city limits of McCall. You go to the mountains to be with nature see things you cant see in the city animals are part of that We are taking their land they are just trying to enjoy what was theirs. If the people who dont like animal should just stay in the city where they do not have to put up with them. Please understand this is the animals land we have taken over it is not their fault why punish them!!!! the people of mccall live there because they love the mountains, the lake and the wildlife... Thank you for listening

322 6/24/21 13:02:57 Renee Baird 13723 Hockberger Ranch Road, Caldwell, ID 83607 Against My daughter is in real estate in McCall and we visit there often, Myself, my family and clients that I have sent her way, all appreciate and love seeing the deer in McCall… it brings a special charm to your town that should never go away, don’t lose one of McCalls biggest asset and charm they bring to all those who visit and live there. Don’t give into the politics of growing and pushing out the animals that are such a joy to see.

323 6/24/21 12:58:33 Laura Kirk 623 Syringa Dr Mccall ID For It should be illegal feed all of the wildlife. Just as you cannot do this in state and federal parks. It’s not healthy or sustainable. It attracts more animals than the habitat can support and creates a nuisance.

Page 42 of 46

324 6/24/21 13:13:51 Deanne Seiler P.O. Box 3225, McCall Against It’s so sad what you want to do. I support NOT killing or moving the deer. Please listen to the impassioned pleas of those who care. Thank you

325 6/24/21 13:16:25 Cathy Buffington 3049 S Terri Way Against I am adamantly against the euthanasia of wildlife, specifically deer, in the City of McCall. The wildLIFE, among many other things, is what makes the town so wonderful!

326 6/24/21 13:20:42 Diane Sanders 653 Woodlands Dr Against I love our town deer, but stop feeding them.

327 6/24/21 12:48:51 Emily Hart 702 1st Street McCall, ID 83638 For "Last night, I was sitting in my yard with a friend, and the most adorable tiny fawn leapt out of the tall grass, practically into our laps. I, too, am completely charmed by occasions like this, and I love animals. However, I re-iterate everything I said in my previous comment about the town deer.

In reference to this week's Opinion in today's Star-News by Julie Conrad, I dispute her claim that ""there have always been town deer."" I have lived in McCall for 45 years, and this is simply not true. Seeing a deer in town was an anomaly, and there most certainly was not a pack of 15 living in my yard all winter. This situation will only get worse. Research the deer situation in Ashland, Oregon, and get a glimpse of what our future may be if we don't act now. "

328 6/24/21 13:29:35 Amy Kohler [email protected] Against Keep the animals in their homes!

329 6/24/21 13:29:31 Karissa Tatom 4498 E Thomas Mill Drive Nampa, ID 83686 Against Euthanizing the town’s deer is a terrible idea. They are a huge part of the appeal of McCall.

330 6/24/21 13:30:19 Denice Ruse-Sullivan 2921 n 36th st Boise Idaho 83703 Against I am totally against this, the animals were here 1st , leave them alone!

331 6/24/21 13:36:12 Suzette Driscoll 1664 S Sportsman Way Meridian Idaho 83642 Against "

A ""Yes"" Vote will start a horrific Train Reaction giving local Fish and Game the ""Go-Ahead"" to immediately start the process to eradicate all town deer.

This is a irreprehensible, uneducated and short-sided decision.

The First step MUST BE for the City Council to TABLE the no-feed ordinance and tell Fish and Game to STAND DOWN.

Page 43 of 46

McCall has ALWAYS been a sanctuary for humans and wildlife alike. Please do not “City-fi” and pave over and alter forever the last vestiges of this beautiful MOUNTAIN town. Once it’s gone, once the deer are gone, this magic, this beauty is GONE FOREVER.

I urge you to VOTE NO today and make the City step back and re-evaluate what they are considering BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE.

We NEED to preserve McCall. The deer BELONG TO ALL OF US."

332 6/24/21 13:54:02 Shannon Reeves 20 Timberline Dr Against I am against this decision.

333 6/24/21 13:53:40 melswfstage@ sbcglobal.net Melinda Pereira Against Save the deer and other wildlife in McCall, Idaho.

334 6/24/21 13:48:51 Teresa Daily 22912 Cirrus View Court, Caldwell, ID Against McCall is situated in the mountains which is the original habitat of wildlife. As we grow we continue to encroach on their habitat and we are now sharing our spaces. How can we terminate innocent animals because we humans are in their space, if we're going to live in their environment then we need to be prepared to share the space. If you don't want to share the space then you should go somewhere else, the animals were here first.

335 6/24/21 13:58:29 Dianne Ryan 601 River Street, McCall, Idaho Against Please don't harm the deer... We need to drive slower, and be more tolerant. Thank you.

336 6/24/21 13:51:31 Heidi Baumgartner [email protected] Against "As an Idaho Native it is absolutely amazing that we are even having to make a stance against issues like this. The McCall area is a place I have always chose to go to for the nature and beauty and along with that comes the wildlife. This is their home and was their home before the PEOPLE from all over (mostly those coming from outside of Idaho) moved in and are now pushing for things like the eradication of the deer. And let me say, this is only the beginning.

Leave them alone! We should be pushing to save them not get rid of them. This is IDAHO- let's remind each other of that. Start doing things like this you will only continue to make people angry, and that is one more thing we DON'T need right now. Have a heart and do the right thing.

HB"

337 6/24/21 14:10:05 Hali James 146 Trail Loop Dr #201 Paducah, Kentucky Against I am against the relocating of deer and other wildlife that grace beautiful McCall Idaho. Listen to the voice of the people.

338 6/24/21 14:06:03 Jim and Debra Staup P.O. Box 1221 McCall, ID 83638 Against So much of this is wrong.. Time to TABLE the Decision !!! There are more humane options. If you pass the ordinance, you know the Council will take a lot of heat regardless of what you may think. This issue has not been well thought out; the consequences will bite our community badly. Take the time to do this correctly and humanely. This is a human caused issue; the deer shouldn't be harmed or killed because of us. Once again, TABLE this decision!!!

Page 44 of 46

339 6/24/21 14:16:48 Tracy Hunter 4026 N Newland Loop, Lehi, Utah 84043 Against Deer do not need to be relocated. THEY WERE HERE BEFORE US. WE INVADED THEIR HOME, NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND. The deer belong in the forests, McCall, and we the people are the visitors!

340 6/24/21 14:28:22 Kaitlin Parsons 325 Valley Springs Road Apt D-206 Against The wildlife in McCall is one of the best parts of living here. Destroying that would be a huge disservice to the community

341 6/24/21 14:27:41 Jennifer Wahlquist 129 Sue Dr McCall, ID For I am for the relocation and management of the local wildlife under the supervision and direction of Idaho’s Fish and Game.

342 6/24/21 14:31:21 Kay Ernst P O Box 117 Vale OR 97918 Against For 18 years our family worked at Camp Pittenger for family work week ends. It was always a treat to see the wildlife in and around McCall. It was THEIR home before we moved in! I don't get to McCall as often now, but when I do, I expect to see the wildlife. I think it is terrible what is being planned to happen to these beautiful creatures of God. Please reconsider and allow them for future generations to enjoy. Thank you

343 6/24/21 14:30:25 Julie Hellerman 212 n 3rd #4 Against I enjoy our town deer and do not feel they are a nuisance . They bring a peace and beauty to our town. Most people enjoy the moments our wildlife brings toMcCall, with wilderness comes wildlife. Please preserve what our community enjoys. Thank you for all you do for our community.

344 6/24/21 14:34:08 Thomas Sowers 261 Buckcamp Rd, McCall ID Against Please let the deer do what they do. There is no reason for further regulation. The deer are not hurting anyone, if you hit one with your car you were probably driving too fast, texting, or intoxicated. If people are feeding them, that should be their business. Spend your time reading the Constitution of the United States. Liberty and Freedom.

345 6/24/21 14:29:07 Nikki Nakan Nikki Nakano I live in town and am a full-time employee of the golf course . I truly feel the deer are a fabric of the McCall environment and do feel they are a true asset, not a nuisance to our environment. Against I love our town deer. With wilderness comes wildlife! Please preserve what all enjoy . Thanks for all that you do for our town!

346 6/24/21 14:36:25 Heather ODonnell 8480 W. Cory Court, Boise, ID 83704 Against Are you people crazy? Leave the wildlife alone. Move if they are a nuisance to you.

347 6/24/21 14:35:43 Nadina Zarkowski 709 Bridle Path Way, McCall, ID 83638 For I support what ever measures it takes to control and decrease the town deer population. I also support the ordinance that forbids the feeding of wildlife.

348 6/24/21 14:38:50 Heather ODonnell 8480 W. Cory Court, Boise ID 83704 Against Are you people crazy? Leave the wildlife alone. Move if they are a nuisance to you.

349 6/24/21 14:46:07 Lori Crogh 13147 Hill House Loop, Box 634 Donnelly ID 83615 Against We live in these mountains to enjoy the beauty and the beasts. To take away one, will leave the other without it's mate. For who are we to decide what is beauty and what is beast?

Page 45 of 46

350 6/24/21 14:37:33 Ashlee Enbysk 6701 Ashland dr Boise ID 83709 Against This is a terrible idea

351 6/24/21 14:50:36 Melissa Dibbe 25153 Shirley Ln Middleton, ID 83644 Against Our family visit McCall multiple times a year and our favorite part is seeing all the new wildlife, especially the deer. There are many reasons this is wrong but please dont do this. What makes this town so beautiful is the natural elements. One year we ate at sushi and the deer were 20 feet away grazing. Or we love when they come up to our cabin to say hi and sleep under the trees at night allowing us to wake up to them just being there. Those memories are a part of the McCall Charm. Don't let anyone take that away. Thank you!

352 6/24/21 14:55:45 Aldana Kay Enbysk 6701 Ashland Dr Boise id 83709 Against Crazy!

Page 46 of 46

To the City Manager, the Mayor, the City Council, and the other public representatives attending tonight, I appreciate the opportunity to have my comment read by all of you for tonight‘s meeting.

Though this is an issue about wildlife management within the city limits, it would seem there is more to it than that.

I believe it is imperative for the community and those who represent it to communicate respectfully with one another to ensure that all members feel heard, seen, and understood. There is a lot to be learned from our mix of educational and experiential backgrounds. Context really is everything. Over the years growing up here I have witnessed the relationship between public officials and our community erode and repair itself many times. Hopefully, this will be a productive and thoughtful process during which trust in our public entities will be encouraged as opposed to a night in which a band aid is slapped on the issue and the relationship further eroded.

We live in a rural, mountain community no matter how much it may feel otherwise this time of year. Wildlife in our community is inevitable.

All of the wildlife issues we are experiencing currently and in the future have not been branded appropriately, these are human issues, not wildlife ones. We have altered the routes, the food supply, and more for these animals and we need to take accountability for our actions. This may include actions such as engagement and education for locals and tourists alike, citing individuals and businesses for feeding wildlife, citing people for not driving responsibly (too fast or impeding traffic to take a photo).

I understand all of this would take resources that may be hard to come by, but education and prevention prove to be more impactful and cost effective in the long run (I say this an economist by training). Not all of us in this community are cevidologists or have a degree in the study of cervids, let alone biology, but I would hope we all are people who enjoy and respect nature. I also believe people want to do good, so it rests on the shoulders of those at the table tonight to provide the opportunity for our community members to learn how to be better.

This is not an isolated incident or issue, we do not need to reinvent the wheel. The precedent has already been set and the burden of proof well established by communities and other Fish & Game districts across the continent. If communities like ours all over North America can co-exist then so can we.

I implore the council to either establish a community action committee or to table the issue for another time. There are plenty of issues at the forefront and as the deer haven’t gone anywhere for over a hundred years, they can probably wait a few more weeks.

Always, Angela Staup

From: Anette Spickard To: BessieJo Wagner; Justin Williams Subject: Fwd: Town Deer Letter Date: Thursday, June 24, 2021 1:30:19 PM

From: Debra Staup Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2021, 1:15 PM To: Anette Spickard Subject: Town Deer Letter

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

June 24, 2021

To the City Manager and City Council,

I am not able to attend the meeting tonight due to a previous obligation. Yet, I still feel the need to followup on my stance regarding the deer in town. I hope you took the time to read my letter I sent for the last meeting.

Before I go any further, I need to express my disappointment in the Police Chief's unprofessional comment about 'Armchair biologists'. It was an uncalled for remark directed at those of us who wrote and or expressed our concerns. Whereas, I may not have a specific degree in biology, I am well educated, a long time resident, a taxpayer, and a voter who took the time to respectfully write a letter to the Council about my concerns. Before I wrote my letter, I researched what other states do with their local deer. Every site I went to was a State Fish and Game site and their Wildlife Management Plan. I found out a lot of information; some of which I felt would be worth considering for our area. I believe if I am going to write my opposition about something, I should also offer up other ideas, options, solutions, or plans. Taking the time to research other strategies from legitimate resources, other 'experts' in the field, and sites are exactly what any person or entity should do before making an important decision. I was not impressed by his comment; this was a public meeting. Remarks and comments should be kept respectful regardless of where we stand on an issue.

Back to the subject at hand. I am not going to rewrite my whole letter again as I am hoping you read it when I had sent it a couple of weeks ago. I realize the Council and City Manager are in a difficult position regarding our town deer. I respect your hard work at trying to find the best solution without inflaming the public. I have heard if you do pass a no feeding ordinance, then our F&G will start the process of trapping, removing/relocating, or killing the deer this winter regardless of what others think or want. It troubles me to hear this as I still feel, according to my research, that we should try other options before going this route.

I know you say what F&G does has nothing to do with you. I get what you are trying to say, yet I believe the backlash will still come your way. This issue and decision are causing anger in the community. I have no idea what you will decide tonight. I would like to believe rational and reasonable thinking will prevail. I suggest this decision be tabled to give everyone a chance time to navigate this situation better.

While it is tabled, we could still move ahead in educating the public about the 'dos and don'ts' etc. regarding the deer/wildlife. A community/council advisory committee could be formed to help guide the process along. I believe if we slow down, look at the successes of other communities, open our minds to making a plan where common ground can be found, we may come out of this with a win for the community and the deer. It is certainly worth a try in my opinion. Thank you for your consideration.

Respectfully, Debra Staup Retired Educator

Sent from my iPad BEND, OREGON:

Wildlife / Deer:

Wildlife in the state of Oregon falls under the control of the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (this includes skunks and raccoons). The Bend Police Department will respond to emergency wildlife calls that pose a danger to the public. Some examples of this would be motor vehicle accidents involving a deer that is unable to walk or a deer entangled in fencing. The Department does not respond to injured deer that are able to stand and walk. Unfortunately, deer walking with broken or missing legs are common in the city limits due to deer having encounters with traffic.

During the spring, it is common to find unattended new born fawns inside the city limits. It is common for female deer to leave the newborn fawns for up to 24hrs unattended while the female deer feeds. It is important to leave the fawn where you find it, and do not move or handle the fawn. Female deer are very protective of fawns, and have been known to attack people and/or dogs when they feel their fawn is threatened. If the fawn is located in a dangerous place such as the middle of a street, or the front door of a business, please contact the Bend Police Department or the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife for further assistance at 541-693-6911.

ODFW Living with Wildlife (state.or.us)

Animal Control | City of Bend (bendoregon.gov)

ODFW Living with Wildlife - Deer and Elk (state.or.us)

Don't_Feed_Deer_and_elk.pdf (state.or.us)

ODFW does feed deer and elk at several wildlife areas during the winter, to keep them off adjacent agricultural lands where they damage crops. These feeding programs are long-term commitments that require significant financial and staffing resources. Feeding starts early in the season so deer and elk’s digestive systems do not have to quickly readjust to new food types, and continues every day, no matter what, until forage conditions improve. Feeding areas are located away from human-populated areas to decrease conflicts. ODFW also conducts disease testing at some feeding sites

Elk_Damage_Flyer.pdf (state.or.us)

deerelkfences.pdf (state.or.us)

STATE OF WASHINGTON:

Living with wildlife | Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife

Page 1 of 5

What the DWR does (utah.gov)

Ungulate feeding brochure (3).pdf

Winter wildlife feeding | Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife

Fact Sheet 09: Urban Mule Deer Issues – WAFWA https://wafwa.org/wpdm-package/fact-sheet-9-urban-mule-deer- issues/?ind=1598462089993&filename=MDWG Fact Sheet 9 Urban Issues.pdf&wpdmdl=5609&refresh=60c13ca683d611623276710

Fact Sheet 02: Understanding Mule Deer and Winter Feeding – WAFWA https://wafwa.org/wpdm-package/fact-sheet-2-winter- feeding/?ind=1598461089273&filename=1598461088wpdm_MDWG Fact Sheet 2 Winter Feeding.pdf&wpdmdl=5599&refresh=60c13ccb209771623276747 mdwg-32_historical_and_current_md_abundance_web.pdf (utah.gov)

Ungulate feeding brochure (3).pdf FROM TOM MOATS AND BIOLOGIST ERIC:

Also find attached a new brochure that we’ve developed to try to stem deer feeding. Not sure if this is “officially” endorsed yet and I don’t think any are printed .. .but I think it’s really good so feel free to borrow from it.

As to why eradication isn’t good I guess I’d just say that this isn’t a good choice because plenty of people no doubt really like the deer and they “belong” to everybody. Of course outside of urban settings they play important simultaneous ecosystem roles of herbivore and prey. Maybe another straightforward reason in opposition to eradication is that it would be expensive and its very likely that deer would just move back into the places that they were removed from.

For some more background . . . .some cities have implemented capture and remove programs. These tend to be expensive, not particularly effective and the relocated deer don’t tend to have a great survival rate. Thayne worked for a while on a project like this in Utah.

Hope this helps,

Eric

Page 2 of 5

STATE OF UTAH:

SALT LAKE CITY — The Utah Division of Wildlife Resources has made the decision to discontinue the translocation of urban deer (removing deer from urban areas and relocating them to rangelands). 50% SURVIVAL RATES FOR RELOCATED DEER A recent DWR study tracked the deer that were removed from urban areas and relocated. It found that about half of the deer did not survive after being relocated.

After weighing the benefits and risks associated with the non-lethal removal option, the DWR has made the decision to discontinue the translocation part of the urban deer program. Research also showed that the translocation efforts didn't significantly change public feedback regarding conflicts with urban deer. DWR discontinues translocation in urban deer program (utah.gov)

What the DWR does (utah.gov)

Fact Sheet 2: Understanding Mule Deer And Winter Feeding (utah.gov)

In some situations, it may be necessary to feed deer to sustain a base population (WAFWA 2003). If necessary, winter feeding of mule deer in Utah will be guided by the winter feeding policy (UDWR 2011b).

In 2017, the Division founded the Utah Wildlife Migration Initiative to document, preserve, and enhance wildlife movement throughout Utah. This initiative uses state-of-the-art GPS tracking technology to monitor the movements of species in near real-time. Information generated by tracking collars is used to define critical habitats for species, including migration corridors. Currently, the Migration Initiative is putting a large focus on documenting mule deer movements. For example, in 2019 there were over 900 mule deer with GPS tracking collars in 15 wildlife management units throughout the state (Figure 7). GPS tracking information allows the Division to precisely define migration corridors for mule deer (Figure 8). The Division uses the information to work with partners to place wildlife crossings on roads, which preserves wildlife movement and reduces deer-vehicle collisions. The information is also used to work with landowners and municipalities to preserve open space for deer and other wildlife to move across the landscape. Additionally, the information is used to target habitat treatment locations and evaluate the success of habitat improvements

Utah Mule Deer Statewide Management Plan, 2019–24

Unit deer management plants (utah.gov)

Page 3 of 5

Is supplemental winter feeding ever warranted?

A DWR conservation officer pours food into a trough as part of an emergency feeding situation in northern Utah. Yes, there are sometimes specific emergency situations when supplemental feeding is beneficial. For example, deer herds in critical wintering areas that are caught in unusually deep and long-lasting snow might benefit from winter feeding.

When the DWR considers supplemental feeding, biologists carefully analyze whether the benefits will outweigh the disadvantages. If a decision is made by the agency to proceed, resources are allocated, special food mixtures are determined and the feeding takes place in an organized, targeted and strategic way that maximizes the benefits to the deer while minimizing the possible adverse consequences.

DWR biologists strongly advise against private individuals and organizations feeding deer. Well-intentioned private feeding endeavors almost always create more problems than they solve. Instead of helping, this kind of feeding can result in higher deer mortality rates and long-term adverse consequences for the herd.

It can be tough on a caring public to avoid the quick fix that deer feeding can offer. People must understand that deer are wild animals and not livestock. Despite the best intentions, winter feeding is usually a last resort and not in the best interest of deer.

Minimizing browsing damage by deer (utah.gov)

Page 4 of 5

Search results (utah.gov)

DWR discontinues translocation in urban deer program (utah.gov)

What the DWR does (utah.gov)

mdwg-32_historical_and_current_md_abundance_web.pdf (utah.gov)

DWR discontinues translocation in urban deer program (utah.gov)

Page 5 of 5

ATTACHMENT 2 06/23/21 Comments related to Resolution 21-25 – Area of Concern

1 6/19/21 15:30:24 Thomas & Kathryn Kilgore 674 Koski Dr. McCall, ID 83638, P.O. Box 1368, McCall, ID 83638

"We respectfully, request the McCall City Council to adopt Resolution 21-25 at the June 24, 2021 City Council Meeting. As home owners in the Woodlands immediately adjacent to the proposed development, we have several concerns about the development including: traffic, ingress and egress, emergency egress, effects on water pressure for current homeowners, construction traffic and noise, loss of wildlife habitat which includes nesting Piliated Woodpeckers, and wetlands, children walking to and from school, narrowed streets during winter months and no current plans for open space or buffer between existing homes and new homes in the proposed development."

2 6/19/21 17:03:32 Bob Wilkinson 678 Koski Drive, McCall, ID 83638

"I would like to weigh in on the proposed development in the Woodlands.

There are a number of issues surrounding this development that I would like to address.

The primary access to and from this new development will be, as proposed, on Woodlands drive.

As there is no sidewalk and as there are many children living on the Woodlands Drive this is a major safety concern. Adding a few hundred cars a day to the Woodlands Drive will have a major impact on both safety and the environment. An environmental impact study would show the relative harm the added traffic would have on the community. In addition, the wildlife would be affected both in the new and the existing areas. When does development and open space collide? Are we to put houses on every plot of land without trying to preserve the natural state of nature that we came here to enjoy. When is enough enough?

Thanks, Bob Wilkinson"

3 6/21/21 8:10:00 Kristen McCoy 676 Koski Dr McCall, ID

"I am writing to support the City staff recommendation to designate the proposed 158-acre Pine Creek Ranch development as an area of critical concern. I would also like to express my concern with the proposed Pine Creek Rach development as currently planned. Woodlands Drive would be the primary route to the development, though it's not developed for such a drastic increase in traffic. Since there are no sidewalks or pathways, the street is used frequently by children and families to get to/from school.

I fully support the City's proposed requirement to conduct an environmental assessment as part of the development application review process. This process would allow the developer to understand the existing environmental resources, and revise the plans to reduce adverse impacts. By doing this research and minimizing impacts to the environment, everyone benefits including those within the future development, adjacent neighborhoods, and entire community of McCall. This is a step that the City should absolutely require before approving any development plans for this area. "

4 6/21/21 11:21:42 Phillip and Sandra Brug 628 Woodlands Drive, PO Box 3367

"We, Phillip and Sandra Brug, residents of The Woodlands at 628 Woodlands Drive, strongly support the designation of Pine Creek Ranch development as an Area of Critical Concern. 06/23/21 Comments related to Resolution 21-25 – Area of Concern

Our primary concern is the safety of children and elderly residents on Woodlands Drive. There are no sidewalks on Woodlands Drive. Children and parents walk to and from school, bike, and recreate using the street itself year around. As elderly residents, we use the road for walking, exercise, and access to the Spring Mountain Bike and Pedestrian path. The Pine Creek Ranch development will increase pedestrian traffic as well as vehicle traffic on Woodlands Drive.

Woodlands Drive is now at maximum capacity for safety. There is no curbside parking. The street is frequently partially blocked by service and delivery vehicles. The current speed limit of 20 mph is consistently ignored. In winter, the high snow walls limit visibility and force pedestrians and traffic together.

The increased residential traffic from the Pine Creek Ranch subdivision, as well as the transportation and infrastructure vehicles used for the development and maintenance of the subdivision, will pose a physical threat to the residents of both The Woodlands and the Pine Creek Ranch.

Please vote to designate Pine Creek Subdivision as an Area of Critical Concern.

Thank you,

Phillip and Sandra Brug"

5 6/21/21 12:33:37 Jeff McCoy 676 Koski Dr

"I am writing to support the City staff recommendation to designate the proposed 158-acre Pine Creek Ranch development as an area of critical concern. I would also like to express my concern with the proposed Pine Creek Ranch development as currently planned. Woodlands Drive would be the primary route to the development, though it's not developed for such a drastic increase in traffic. Since there are no sidewalks or pathways, the street is used frequently by children and families to get to/from school.

6 6/21/21 16:50:37 Jim & Deb Broich 613 Woodlands St, McCall ID

"We support the designation as an ""Area of Critical Concern"" for the following reasons:

1. Traffic. Woodlands is only access point for the neighborhood and increased congestion will create potential safety and noise issues for the residents. Increased traffic will result in degradation of existing road and presents a risk to wildlife in area.

2. A main access point off Deinhard should be mandatory.

3. Need sidewalks, bike lanes and general widening of road for this to work."

06/23/21 Comments related to Resolution 21-25 – Area of Concern

7 6/21/21 18:03:24 Margie Elliott

In support of the Pine Creek Ranch "An Area of Critical Concern" Reso!ution. My husband and I have lived at 661 Woodlands Drive for 11 years. Gradually during that period the character of the neighborhood has changed from vacation / 2cd homes to permanent residences of working, young families. Our major concern is the sheer volume of additional traffic jeopardizing the safety of children walking to and from the elementary and middle schools, the pool, tennis and volleyball courts and common area, walkers, joggers, folks walking their pets. All of the interactions that make this small part of McCall a comfortable, friendly community to live in. Other issues....The narrowed streets during winter, wildlife, so many concerns. 8 6/23/21 12:11:25 Louise Laduke 657 Woodlands Drive, McCall, ID

I am writing in support of the designation of the 158 acre parcel (owned by Pinecreek Ranch LLC) as an "Area of Critical Concern". The development of this property will have a huge impact on the Woodlands neighborhood. Woodlands Drive is the only access to our neighborhood & adding the large number of proposed households that will utilize our street is a safety concern for all. Please include an assessment of the impact of increased traffic through the Woodlands neighborhood as a part of the "Area of Critical Concern" evaluation.

9 6/23/21 14:02:44 Gail Rankin 675 Fox Ridge Lane

"This is a comment about the proposed Pine Creek development east of the Woodlands and Fox Ridge. What is the meaning of the the term ""area of critical concern"" with regard to this development. How does a resolution to designate this are as an area of critical concern affect the project?

I apologize if this is not submitted in the correct location."

10 6/23/21 14:08:24 Gail Rankin 675 Fox Ridge Lane

This is a comment about the proposed Pine Creek Development - I'm sorry if it is not submitted in the correct place. As a resident of the Fox Ridge subdivision I am concerned about the overall planning for sewer usage and ingress/egress for this area. The currently drawn ingress/egress seems very inadequate for the number of potential homes. Thank you.

13 6/23/21 16:56:43 John Riggins 662 Koski Dr., McCall, ID 83638 (PO Box 1925

I support the adoption of resolution 21-25, Designating Certain Properties as an “Area of Critical Concern”, regarding the need to perform environmental and other studies before considering petitioner's request for any city action (zoning changes, plat approvals, annexation, water connection permits, etc.) pertaining to the 158 acres proposed for development east of The Woodlands subdivision. Said 158 acre development is also known as Pine Creek Ranch.

16 6/23/21 19:54:28 Ginger Riggins 662 Koski Dr, PO Box 1925, McCall, ID 83638

"I support the adoption of AB 21-173 Resolution 21-25 the Designation of Certain Properties as an

“Area of Critical Concern”. I live in the Woodlands subdivision and am concerned about the development of the 158 acres to the east and south of us called Pine Creek Ranch. Currently there is only one entrance and exit to the Woodlands subdivision, which is Woodlands Drive. This road is already very busy with cars, delivery trucks, people walking, people biking and children playing. In the wintertime with snow the road turns into a single lane road and still there are delivery trucks parking on the road and adults and children walking. I am not sure if you are aware but this is how the children go to and from school. There have already been several accidents on Woodlands Dr. in the winter; adding more people and cars to this road is dangerous. I am also worried about the fire danger of more homes to our east and south. If there is a wildfire how can so many people and cars escape in time? More importantly, how would fire crews get to the fire while residents are trying to escape? Another issue is water. Every evening around dinnertime our water pressure drops. It can be very hard to wash the dishes during that time. With more homes it would seem that the water pressure would be even worse. What if there is a wildfire during the early evening? How will they fight the fire with such low water

Page 1 of 7 pressure? This doesn't even address the enviormental concerns of so much of our beautiful woods and wetlands being destroyed by more people and homes. The developer total us that his home prices would be affordable ""starting at $700,000"". That is not affodable to anyone I know. The deveopler's description sounds like he plans to build homes for people who want second homes and for people from outside Idaho and not for the working people of McCall. Thank you for looking out for the welfare of the citizens of McCall."

19 6/23/21 21:48:26 Robert Bechaud 664 Woodlands Drive, McCall

I urge Council to approve Resolution 21-25, designating a landlocked 158 parcel proposed for residential development, as an Area of Critical Concern. As a resident of the Woodlands, adjacent to the parcel, I had the opportunity to review the preliminary plans as envisioned by the developer. It is obvious that road access to this parcel will have a significant negative impact on the Woodlands and Fox Ridge neighborhoods if cost of development is the only criteria. There are alternatives that would mitigate the impacts but these alternatives need careful evaluation to identify the best long term approach. The proposed Resolution should provide a professional evaluation of the feasibility and cost of the alternative approaches.

20 6/23/21 21:03:03 Dawn Matus 608 Woodlands Dr, McCall 83638

As a resident of the Woodlands, I have serious reservations about the proposed Pine Creek Ranch development as planned, and I support the proposed designation of the two parcels of land it encompasses as an "Area of Critical Concern." In addition to the loss of woodland habitat on the 158- acre parcel, increased traffic in the Woodlands is a major worry. Woodlands Drive, where my family and I live, is currently the only access road into the Woodlands itself. There are no walking paths or sidewalks along Woodlands Drive, and the road itself does not appear to have been designed with high- volume traffic or large trucks in mind. If nothing is done, the coming and going of heavy equipment and construction vehicles into Pine Creek Ranch, and later, increased residential traffic, would pose a safety risk for children who walk to school, as well as to the many pedestrians and cyclists in our neighborhood. With only one main thoroughfare into the area, dangerous bottlenecks could occur during an emergency or natural disaster. Added traffic would also add to the wear and tear of the road itself. I respectfully urge city planners and the City Council to carefully consider the proposed project's potential impacts on the environment, public safety and quality of life before allowing it to proceed.

21 6/23/21 20:53:27 Wade Schwark 600 Woodlands Dr. , McCall, ID

"As resident of the Woodlands Subdivision(118 units)...and being situated on the corner of Woodlands Dr and Spring Mtn Blvd(SE corner)... we are already seeing the effects of increased summer traffic(along with the current construction) on both Woodlands Dr and Spring Mtn...Woodlands Dr is very narrow and does not have a bike lane or shoulder, and in fact has drainage ditches on both sides(and snow piles in the winter...some of the culvert pipes have been buried by sediment )...the addition of the Pine Creek Subdivision traffic would perhaps double or triple the traffic volume on this narrow road which is used by children walking to school, joggers and cyclists...if Woodlands Dr does become the primary ingress/egress of Pine Creek(and it will become so if Woodlands & Pine Creek are connected because of it's proximity to Wooley Ave and the town center) ....it will jeopardize the safety of all who use that road and may in fact create a situation that would require traffic control(a traffic light) at the junction of Woodlands Dr and Spring Mtn as even now traffic backs up by 3 or 4 vehicles(making it difficult for us to

Page 2 of 7 exit our own driveway) at busy congestion times, weekends and holidays....the increased traffic from Pine Creek will also hinder public safety vehicle traffic responding to emergencies and wildfire evacuation...we ask that you conduct a traffic study which includes the projected Pine Creek subdivision additional volume modeling, take fire evacuation into consideration, and designate the 68ac and 90ac proposed Pine Creek parcels as areas of ""critical concern"" so that the impact of over 500 additional residences can be studied further....

Thanks, Wade & Debra Schwark

McCall"

22 6/23/21 22:24:19 Ken Enochs 608 Woodlands Dr, McCall ID 83638

As a resident of the Woodlands, I strongly oppose the development of Pine Creek Ranch, especially if it involves using Woodlands Drive as access. Woodlands Drive is already a heavily trafficked road and would be considerably more so (unbearably so, really) if a large development were to be accessed through it. It would become unsafe for children, cyclists, walkers, pets, etc. For those of us living on Woodlands Drive, we can expect our housing values to plummet. Pine Creek Ranch should be allowed to be developed only if another access point is provided and Woodlands Drive is left to serve only the Woodlands as it was intended.

25 6/24/21 0:05:23 Holly Greenlee 619 Woodlands Drive, McCall, ID 83638

"Dear Council,

I am writing to respectfully request that the parcels of land owned by Pine Creek Ranch be designated as an Area of Critical Concern.

My family lives on Woodlands Drive. My husband and I have five children, three of whom attend the elementary school and two others who will start at the elementary school within a couple years. We walk our kids to and from school every day. After school, we walk and ride bikes for exercise. Our children regularly walk down the road to visit friends who live on the street, and we walk most summer days to the neighborhood pool. Because there are no sidewalks, all this walking and riding takes place in the street. And in the winter months especially, much of the walking occurs on icy roads in the dark.

We feel that Woodlands Drive is already dangerous for children. For a narrow road with no sidewalks, there is a lot of traffic, and too many cars exceed the speed limit. With the dramatically increased traffic that will result from the Pine Creek Ranch development, we do not expect to be able to walk anywhere any longer. We will most likely have to drive even to reach the end of our street. This would be burdensome and inconvenient, and it would defeat the primary reason we moved to this development—the walking distance to the school and the nearby activities for children.

We ask that you please consider the safety of our kids in determining whether to designate the parcels as an Area of Critical Concern.

Thank you,

Holly Greenlee"

Page 3 of 7

31 6/24/21 8:31:57 Tom & Kathy Kilgore 674 Koski Dr. McCall, ID 83638

We live in the Woodlands directly in front of the proposed new Pine Creek Ranch development. This morning, Thursday, June 24th, two trucks and a backhoe drove behind our house at 6:00 AM. One of the trucks had a logo for Allwest, an engineering/testing firm apparently hired by the developer. We noticed the Allwest office in Meridian doesn't open until 8:00 AM but they had no issue about driving a backhoe behind our house at 6:00 AM. We understand the developer's need for testing but 6:00 AM is out of line. We again, urge the Council to adopt Resolution 21-25 at tonight's meeting.

33 6/24/21 9:05:16 Donald and Pamela Sanda 639 Woodlands Dr., McCall, ID

"We wish to provide a comment about the city council's consideration of a resolution to designate the proposed Pine Creek Ranch development as an ""Area of Critical Concern"".

As we are full time residents living on Woodlands Drive in the Woodlands Subdivision, our concern centers around the increased volume of traffic and safety issues that the large Pine Creek development would impose on this neighborhood. Woodlands Drive would undoubtedly become the default access to this new development, which would dramatically increase safety hazards for children, pedestrians, and bicyclists. As in much of McCall, separating vehicular traffic from pedestrian traffic is challenging. Woodlands Drive already experiences a great deal of traffic, with all too much of it exceeding the posted speed limit. In addition, the increased volume of traffic would have a detrimental impact on the quality of life that we presently enjoy as residents in this neighborhood.

If the Pine Creek Development were to proceed, it should be allowed to do so only if a great deal of sensitivity be shown to the affected neighborhood and the existing natural environmental conditions. We whole heartedly endorse that the council approve the resolution to require the Pine Creek Development be designated as an ""Area of Critical Concern""."

34 6/24/21 9:50:59 Sheree Sonfield 664 Woodlands Dr, McCall, ID 83638

"This is a comment on the City Planning Department’s proposed Resolution 21-25 to designate the 158 acres adjacent to The Woodlands and owned by Pine Creek Ranch, LLC as an “Area of Critical Concern”. If passed by council, the resolution would require an environmental assessment of the acreage.

I support Resolution 21-25 and ask that you approve it with the requirement that the assessment specifically consider all potential options for vehicular traffic. This landlocked parcel with R4 zoning will add over 600 single family lots, presenting issues for routine and emergency access, as well as construction access.

I’d like you to note these points:

1) The 158 acres is landlocked– it is surrounded by the Nokes Property, The Woodlands, Fox Ridge, and West Place.

2) Unless a major new access point and road network is established, existing roadways will be overwhelmed thus creating safety hazards. There are many young children who use Woodlands roads to walk to the nearby schools.

3) The Woodlands (118 single family lots) plus Fox Ridge (32 single family lots) have 2 exits onto Spring Mountain Rd. The 158 acres’ residents (over 600 single family lots) would go through these 2

Page 4 of 7 existing neighborhoods to access Spring Mountain Ranch. More than 750 single family lots would use 2 access points to Spring Mountain Ranch Road.

4) Compare this to current development along Spring Mountain from Lick Creek to Bitteroot Dr:

9 access points to Spring Mountain Rd; 528 single family lots (East of SMR)

5) Woodlands Drive is only 23 feet wide (at its widest point), with no shoulder or separate path. This does not meet the cross-section of a “local street’ in the Transportation Master Plan, much less a busier street. In winter, the road is even more narrow and the snowbanks are so high that sight lines are obscured for safe exit of driveways along Woodlands Drive.

The McCall Comprehensive Plan includes transportation goals and policies that all speak to the importance of safe streets.

The assessment needs to recognize the acreage is landlocked and that insufficient access has been proposed in the preliminary plan concepts. The assessment needs to look at creating additional and practical access to the landlocked acreage.

Unless a major new access point and road network is established, existing roadways will be overwhelmed thus creating safety hazards. "

36 6/24/21 11:04:15 Thaddeus Hoffman 602 Woodlands Drive, McCall Idaho 83638 "My name is Thaddeus Hoffman, residing at 602 Woodlands Drive, McCall Idaho. I am here this evening to ask that the Council vote in favor of adopting Resolution 21-25 Designating Certain Properties as an “Area of Critical Concern”. Specifically, I am asking that 158 acres to the Northeast, East and Southeast of the Woodlands neighborhood be designated an area of critical concern. This includes approximately 68 acres; Parcel Number RPM00000150605, located within city limits; and approximately 90 acres; Parcel Number RP18N03E154641 located in Valley County but within the City of McCall impact area.

Our community was recently made aware of a planned development of these two parcels. This planned development appears to comprise four phases which, if all four phases are completed, would add about 353 single family zone R4 lots plus additional medium density zone R8 housing. In addition, if the 90 acre parcel is annexed by the city, the completed development would add a sub-division comprising about 3% of McCall’s current land area.

The fact that Chapter 7, Section 9.7.08 of our city code provides the council with the ability to specify areas of critical concern speaks volumes about our citizens respect for the unique environment we are surrounded by and our duty to ensure that any development is done with sensitivity to the unique animal life, plant life, wetlands, soils and scenic areas that make life in McCall distinct in all of Idaho.

Designation of this property as an Area of Critical Concern will ensure that any development is accomplished with full consideration of the environmental impacts due to increased traffic, noise, lighting, reduction of forest, loss of watershed, and proximity to the learning environments of our elementary and middle schools.

Page 5 of 7

I ask that, with the designation of this property as a Area of Critical Concern, an environmental assessment be accomplished and reviewed by our city staff and consultants; prior to approval of each phase of development of these sensitive 158 acres."

38 6/24/21 12:17:42 Nancy Cussler P.O. Box 2625, 652 Woodlands Dr. McCall, Idaho 83638 "To Whom It May Concern,

I am writing regarding the proposed Resolution 21-25 designating the two parcels of land comprising the Pine Creek Development (proposed) as an ""Area of Critical Concern"". I strongly support your approval of such Resolution due the major impact this development would have on the safety of The Woodlands residents including many school age children. As proposed and by default, Woodlands Drive would be the primary route in and out of the 158 acre development resulting in a dramatic increase in traffic and impact on the residents of The Woodlands. We have no sidewalks or paths along Woodlands Dr. and the significant narrowing of the roadway in the winter due to snow accumulation make the traffic plan as proposed very concerning and dangerous.

Please approve Resolution 21-25 designating the 158 acre proposed Pine Creek Development as an ""Area of Critical Concern"" requiring the developer to conduct a comprehensive environmental assessment prior to submitting a development application. It is imperative that traffic patterns and safety of the residents already living in the area be strongly considered.

Thank you,

Nancy Cussler"

39 6/24/21 13:22:49 Diane Sanders 653 Woodlands Dr

We live in a wonderful neighborhood (Woodlands). We don't have sidewalks but people are always walking their kids to school, riding bikes, and walking their dog. If you put 300 homes at the end of our subdivision and there is only one way in it will put an unreal amount of traffic on our roads, and it would be 10 times worse in the winter because of the snow and poor visibility. Why let some developer make a large amount of money and make our street dangerous. Again we don't have sidewalks or a walking path to keep our kids, dogs and others safe. We understand that there will be another road into these houses but our route would be the shortest which means that would be the one that most would take to get home. Please, please, please think about those of us that are already living here, instead of all the money you'll be making for this developer. These homes aren't for the working class in McCall, and business are already cutting hours or not able to open because they can't get workers. Slow down the growth, make smart decisions for our town.

42 6/24/21 14:18:56 Marnie Sell 605 Woodlands Drive, McCall ID 83638 (PO Box 4448) "Dear McCall City Council,

I am writing to request that you help to protect the safety and serenity of the Woodlands. As a resident of the Woodlands, I am greatly concerned about the effect of the proposed developments in the land bordering the Woodlands.

My family and I have been residents of the Woodlands for almost nine years. As one of the few neighborhoods in McCall that does not allow short term rentals, we have enjoyed a quiet and calm neighborhood throughout the years. Our daughter and many of the neighborhood children enjoy

Page 6 of 7 bicycling, walking and rollerblading around the neighborhood. Even now, I sometimes worry about their safety as they play together or walk to school because there are no sidewalks in the Woodlands. Pedestrians and cars must share the narrow roads that wind through our neighborhood. I am concerned that additional homes will increase the traffic and make our streets more dangerous.

Summer pedestrians are an important issue, another consideration is winter when the snowplows can barely keep our streets clear. There are times throughout the winter when on streets are just over one lane wide. Here again, I am concerned about traffic from the proposed new development.

Perhaps one of the greatest issues regarding these developments is the absence of a practical alternate entrance in and out of the Woodlands. I have heard of proposals for the far end of the neighborhood, however who will use these on a day-to-day basis if the convenient existing entrance is available? Any propositions I have seen for an alternate entrance would mean the residents would have to go out of their way to get to and from the town from their homes. I predict that most people will continue to use Woodlands Drive which clearly has not been designed to sustain any more traffic that it currently handles.

All of my concerns about traffic have been during normal days, I am concerned about the additional traffic that could be brought on by emergencies in the depths of the new proposed neighborhoods.

One last concern I would like you to consider is the impact and loss of the woodland habitat. The forests that surround the Woodlands are home to deer, elk, and countless other woodland creatures and birds. Residents and visitors to the Woodlands enjoy the sounds and sights of these beautiful animals in our community and would be saddened to see their homes replaced by dwellings for humans.

Please consider the safety of the existing residents, and also those unsuspecting, new homeowners should the development proceed. How will we safely navigate the existing streets together, especially in winter when the streets are narrowed or in an emergency?

So many people in McCall enjoy strolling and riding their bikes through the Woodlands, it is a very beautiful place that I have enjoyed calling home. I am very concerned that the proposed new development will change this, and also create public safety issues for residents.

Thank you for considering my concerns.

Sincerely,

Marnie-Anne Sell

The Woodlands"

Page 7 of 7

June 24, 2021

Dear Mayor Giles and members of the City Council,

I am writing regarding AB 21-173, a resolution to designate two parcels owned by Pine Creek Ranch, LLC as an “Area of Critical Concern.” The designation will require the preparation of an environmental assessment as part of the development application review process.

The developer of this area has shared a conceptual plan of the Pine Creek Ranch development with the Woodlands neighborhood, where I live, as well as with other stakeholders. I would like to address a specific area of concern that I hope this environmental assessment will include – an evaluation of the traffic safety issues that a subdivision of this size would create on existing neighborhoods and roads.

As you know the two parcels in question are directly east of the Woodlands neighborhood, the elementary and middle schools, and the Fox Ridge neighborhood. The Pine Creek Ranch parcels comprise 158 acres which is more than three times the acreage of the Woodlands neighborhood. If developed under R4 zoning, the number of home sites in the Pine Creek Ranch subdivision could exceed the number of home sites in the Woodlands by a factor of more than 5 (approximately 600 vs approximately 115). As another reference point, under R4 zoning the number of home sites in Pine Creek Ranch would be more than double those in Spring Mountain Ranch.

This large proposed development currently has no direct road access to a minor or major collector. Under current conditions, there are only 2 practical access points to the Pine Creek Ranch parcels – one through the Woodlands neighborhood and one through Fox Ridge. Both of these access points are local streets that were not designed or built to serve as major (or even minor) collectors from a large subdivision. More specifically, Woodlands Drive is a narrow street with no shoulders, sidewalks, or pathways, and visibility is poor especially on the lower portion of the road. Even with existing traffic conditions, there have been accidents and near misses on Woodlands Drive. Visibility is even worse during the winter due to high snowbanks that make it difficult for neighbors to exit their driveways. Many residents have to back into their driveways so that when they want to exit they can inch their way out slowly into the roadway and hope that they are not struck by oncoming traffic.

Furthermore, the location of the Woodlands neighborhood adjacent to the elementary and middle schools must be considered when evaluating traffic impacts. Woodlands Drive provides the only access on public rights-of-way for children to walk or bike to school. Safety on Woodlands Drive must be preserved so that we don’t become a community that buses or drives kids a quarter- or half-mile to school because the roads are too dangerous to walk or bike. Woodlands Drive also provides the only access from the Woodlands neighborhood to the City’s interconnected pathway network. Safe streets, multi-modal transit opportunities and access to the City’s pathway network are fundamental tenets of the McCall Transportation Master plan.

A subdivision like Pine Creek Ranch that is of such an enormous magnitude will have wide, significant, long-term impacts on McCall’s population (potentially adding several thousand additional residents), the environment, the infrastructure, and the need for services (such as emergency services, police, schools, healthcare, etc) that must also be considered to determine if existing conditions can absorb such an impact and if this scale of development is desirable for our community.

I certainly hope that the city staff, Planning and Zoning Commission, and City Council will look at these issues as the development planning process evolves. However, at this time, my strong request is that any environmental assessment include a close evaluation of the impact of traffic on street safety through existing neighborhoods. I would hope the assessment would also suggest strategies to mitigate that impact, such as by creating an alternative primary access to the Pine Creek Ranch development via an eastward extension of Deinhard Lane or by restricting the number of home sites that would have traffic access through existing neighborhoods.

We must remain committed to McCall’s vision of a family-friendly community and to the many City of McCall planning documents that place the highest priority on safety and walkability of our streets.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,

Marcia Witte 669 Woodlands Drive From: Diane Kushlan To: BessieJo Wagner Cc: Brian Parker; Michelle Groenevelt Subject: FW: City Council Resolution on Pine Creek Ranch Date: Tuesday, June 22, 2021 4:08:13 PM

BessieJo: I don’t know if the City Council is interested in this conversation, but the last response indicates the owner’s acquiesce to the designation of an area of critical concern. ‘Up to you if you want to forward it to Council or not, or we can verbally indicate their position to the City Council. d.

From: Craig Groves Sent: Monday, June 21, 2021 4:43 PM To: Diane Kushlan ; Bonnie Layton ; Gregg Tankersley ; [email protected] Cc: Michelle Groenevelt ; Brian Parker Subject: RE: City Council Resolution on Pine Creek Ranch

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Diane,

We certainly will not object to the proposed resolution since we planned on submitting an environmental assessment, economic assessment, soils analysis, etc. with our application. I can meet you on June 25th if that will work for you. I would like to coordinate with the City and it staff to make sure our team of consultants are acceptable and that all points of view are covered.

I want to assure you that we have stopped any type of specific land planning until we have completed the environmental assessment, except for coordinating a discussion between stakeholders regarding the intersection of Deinhard and Spring Mountain Ranch Road which includes the possibility of extending Deinhard east.

I am very excited about the opportunities surrounding the property and certainly hope the city shares the same excitement. We will do this right!

Craig Groves

From: Diane Kushlan [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, June 21, 2021 3:24 PM To: Craig Groves ; Bonnie Layton ; Gregg Tankersley ; [email protected] Cc: Michelle Groenevelt ; Brian Parker Subject: RE: City Council Resolution on Pine Creek Ranch

Craig, thanks. I will be in McCall 6/25-7/2, except for a quick trip to Boise on 6/28 and generally available anytime. d.

From: Craig Groves Sent: Monday, June 21, 2021 10:48 AM To: Diane Kushlan ; Bonnie Layton ; Gregg Tankersley ; [email protected] Subject: Re: City Council Resolution on Pine Creek Ranch

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hi Diane,

When would you like to meet. I am copying some of our team members on the email and have forwarded your email to them.

Besides Derek with ecosystem sciences, we have a soils and economic consultants on board.

I am traveling until 6/24 but will make myself available anytime after the 24th.

R. Craig Groves 208-794-7694

On Jun 21, 2021, at 11:55 AM, Diane Kushlan wrote:

Craig, Michelle has asked me to stay on with the city and coordinate the management of the City review of the Pine Creek Ranch. As you may recall she indicated to you some time ago the city’s position that the development proposal for this property should follow a comprehensive land analysis of the natural and built environmental conditions on and surrounding the site. Such an analysis would provide for a holistic view of the opportunities and constraints for development of the site. Since forwarding to you a broad scope of what that would look like, there has been scattered contacts from you and your representatives between city staff, including the city manager, neighborhoods and other public agencies which is exactly what this comprehensive approach is trying to avoid. Completing an inclusive land analysis report that lays out all the issues would provide a resource of common basis of information that everyone can use and would set the stage for a more efficient review of the development application. The subdivision code allows for certain areas to be designated as an “Area of Critical Concern” based on certain criteria which the Pine Creek Ranch qualifies as because of its location outside the city but within the area of city impact. With this designation, an environmental assessment is required prior to action on any subdivision development review. The assessment is to be completed by an interdisciplinary team of professionals. At the City Council meeting on Thursday, we are asking the Council to designate the Pine Creek Ranch properties as an Area of Critical Concern, requiring the preparation of an environmental assessment prior to review of a development application. Attached is a copy of the City Council agenda, the staff report and draft resolution associated with this action. It looks like it is the last action item on the agenda. I am sure there will be an opportunity for public comment and the council will receive written comment in advance. If the City Council adopts this resolution, I suggest that we have a meeting with your representatives who will be completing the environmental assessment for a scoping session. d.

Diane T. Kushlan, FAICP

City of McCall Pay Code Transaction Report - Council Department Report Page: 1 Pay period: 6/26/2021 - 7/9/2021 Jul 14, 2021 04:29PM

Total 2-00 10-00 Gross Overtime Overtime-G Emp No Name Amount Emp Amt Emp Amt

Total Airport: 2 4,320.54 .00 .00 Total City Clerk: 3 6,423.22 .00 .00 Total City Manager: 4 12,675.03 .00 .00 Total Community Development: 7 16,360.31 .00 .00 Total Council: 5 1,400.00 .00 .00 Total Finance: 3 7,558.11 .00 .00 Total Golf Course Maint: 18 19,704.62 135.73 .00 Total Info systems: 2 5,588.32 .00 .00 Total Library: 8 8,698.95 .00 .00 Total Local Option Tax: 1 1,567.27 .00 .00 Total Parks: 11 15,160.54 345.47 .00 Total Police: 15 45,374.97 1,340.35 .00 Total PW/Streets: 14 27,217.19 .00 .00 Total Recreation Programs: 4 7,815.18 119.25 .00 Total Water Distribution: 5 10,468.88 192.53 .00 Total Water Treatment: 2 5,700.38 .00 .00

Grand Totals: 104 196,033.51 2,133.33 .00 City of McCall Leave Report - Council Requested Comp Time Page: 1 Report Dates: 06/26/2021 - 07/09/2021 Jul 14, 2021 4:25PM Report Criteria: Selected pay codes: 9-02 (Comp Time Available)

Title Hours Hours Hours Hours Beg Bal Accrued Used Remain 9-02 Total Airport: 24.98 .00 .00 24.98

Total City Clerk: 46.02 2.63 .00 48.65

Total City Manager: 21.30 5.63 10.00 16.93

Total Community Development: 53.20 19.13 4.00 68.33

Total Finance: 29.38 2.25 1.50 30.13

Total Golf Course Maint: 8.13 11.63 .75 19.01

Total Info systems: 9.00 .00 .00 9.00

Total Library: .38 .00 .00 .38

Total Local Option Tax: .00 .00 .00 .00

Total Parks: 47.56 41.63 .00 89.19

Total Police: 271.94 34.88 .00 306.82

Total PW/Streets: 113.35 10.50 8.00 115.85

Total Recreation Programs: 26.38 20.25 .00 46.63

Total Water Distribution: 165.99 10.50 48.00 128.49

Total Water Treatment: 25.88 .75 .00 26.63 CITY OF McCALL Payment Approval Report - by GL - Portrait Page: 1 Report dates: 7/2/2021-7/15/2021 Jul 15, 2021 02:35PM

Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Invoice Date Net Invoice Amount Amount Paid Date Paid

01-11750 UTILITY CASH CLEARING KNOWLES, HANK 159351 DBLE PAYMENT FOR APRIL METER RE 07/13/21 48.41 .00

Total 01-11750 UTILITY CASH CLEARING: 48.41 .00

Total : 48.41 .00

PAYROLL PAYABLES CLEARING

03-21521 COBRA - DENTAL WILLAMETTE DENTAL INSURANCE 202107-COBRA PREMIUMS - GROUP #Z1759 - ID51 07/01/21 90.00 90.00 07/08/2021

Total 03-21521 COBRA - DENTAL: 90.00 90.00

03-22313 AFLAC AFLAC 268423 PREMIUMS - A/C #OLF52 06/25/21 159.04 159.04 07/08/2021

Total 03-22313 AFLAC: 159.04 159.04

03-22314 DENTAL DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF IDAHO 202107 PREMIUMS - #2667-0000 06/22/21 3,260.67 3,260.67 07/08/2021

Total 03-22314 DENTAL: 3,260.67 3,260.67

03-22315 COLONIAL COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENT 3289725-0701229 PREMIUMS - BCN E3289725 06/21/21 525.70 525.70 07/08/2021

Total 03-22315 COLONIAL: 525.70 525.70

03-22316 IDAHO NCPERS GROUP LIFE NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS C440721 PREMIUMS - C44000000000 06/10/21 16.00 16.00 07/08/2021

Total 03-22316 IDAHO NCPERS GROUP LIFE: 16.00 16.00

03-22317 OHIO NATIONAL LIFE OHIO NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE 87822265 PREMIUMS - SS0004892 07/01/21 21.47 21.47 07/08/2021

Total 03-22317 OHIO NATIONAL LIFE: 21.47 21.47

03-22323 HRA ADMIN FEE NUESYNERGY INC. 2021-06 HRA/FSA ADMIN FEES 07/08/21 400.00 .00

Total 03-22323 HRA ADMIN FEE: 400.00 .00

03-22326 HEALTH INSURANCE PAYABLE III-A TRUST 202107 PREMIUMS - #142-MCCALL 07/08/21 94,025.00 94,025.00 07/08/2021

Total 03-22326 HEALTH INSURANCE PAYABLE: 94,025.00 94,025.00

03-22328 VISION PAYABLE III-A TRUST 202107 VISION PREMIUMS - #142-MCCALL 07/08/21 1,053.00 1,053.00 07/08/2021

Total 03-22328 VISION PAYABLE: 1,053.00 1,053.00 CITY OF McCALL Payment Approval Report - by GL - Portrait Page: 2 Report dates: 7/2/2021-7/15/2021 Jul 15, 2021 02:35PM

Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Invoice Date Net Invoice Amount Amount Paid Date Paid

03-22330 WILLAMETTE DENTAL WILLAMETTE DENTAL INSURANCE 202107 PREMIUMS - GROUP #Z1759 - ID51 07/01/21 2,883.20 2,883.20 07/08/2021

Total 03-22330 WILLAMETTE DENTAL: 2,883.20 2,883.20

03-22333 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE UNUM LIFE INS. CO. OF AMERICA 202107-LIFE LIFE INS. #0094659-001 2 06/15/21 1,012.90 1,012.90 07/08/2021 UNUM LIFE INS. CO. OF AMERICA 202107-VLIFE LIFE INS. #0094658-001 5 06/15/21 643.44 643.44 07/08/2021

Total 03-22333 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE: 1,656.34 1,656.34

03-22375 CHILD SUPPORT IDAHO CHILD SUPPORT RECEIPTING 20210716-2 CHILD SUPPORT - #195240 07/16/21 69.22 69.22 07/16/2021 OREGON DEPT. OF JUSTICE 20210716-5 CASE ID - 410000000121812 07/16/21 252.00 252.00 07/16/2021

Total 03-22375 CHILD SUPPORT: 321.22 321.22

Total : 104,411.64 104,011.64

Total PAYROLL PAYABLES CLEARING: 104,411.64 104,011.64

GENERAL FUND MAYOR & COUNCIL 10-41-150-275.0 PUBLIC RELATIONS STAR NEWS, THE 56684 DISPLAY AD - MCCALL COUNCIL JULY 07/08/21 264.00 .00 STAR NEWS, THE 56721 DISPLAY AD - LAKESIDE LIBERTY FES 07/01/21 660.00 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-GREAVES TOURS ARE NOW AVAILABLE - GET A G 06/25/21 7.10 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-GREAVES PROMOTING MCCALL GOLF CLUB 06/25/21 24.94 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-GREAVES EVENT: AIRPORT OPEN HOUSE 06/25/21 41.21 .00

Total 10-41-150-275.0 PUBLIC RELATIONS: 997.25 .00

10-41-150-420.0 TRAVEL AND MEETINGS U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WAGNER HOTEL FOR AIC CONF AND PARKING - 06/25/21 417.00 .00

Total 10-41-150-420.0 TRAVEL AND MEETINGS: 417.00 .00

Total MAYOR & COUNCIL: 1,414.25 .00

INFORMATION SYSTEMS 10-42-150-392.0 WEB PAGE EVO STUDIOS INC. 0014042 ANNUAL WEB MAINTENANCE 07/13/21 1,500.00 .00

Total 10-42-150-392.0 WEB PAGE: 1,500.00 .00

10-42-150-460.0 TELEPHONE VERIZON WIRELESS 9881038338 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 06/01/21 358.20 .00 VERIZON WIRELESS 9883190918 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 07/01/21 174.90 .00

Total 10-42-150-460.0 TELEPHONE: 533.10 .00

10-42-150-465.0 COMMUNICATIONS - ETHERNET ZIPLY FIBER 0721-0944 PHONE SERVICE - ETHERNET - 208-19 07/07/21 1,280.00 .00

Total 10-42-150-465.0 COMMUNICATIONS - ETHERNET: 1,280.00 .00

Total INFORMATION SYSTEMS: 3,313.10 .00 CITY OF McCALL Payment Approval Report - by GL - Portrait Page: 3 Report dates: 7/2/2021-7/15/2021 Jul 15, 2021 02:35PM

Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Invoice Date Net Invoice Amount Amount Paid Date Paid

CITY MANAGER 10-43-100-160.0 EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-SPICKARD APPRECIATION LUNCH POST COVID - 06/25/21 745.43 .00

Total 10-43-100-160.0 EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION: 745.43 .00

10-43-150-300.0 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-GREAVES MONDOCODE LLC 06/25/21 32.22 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-GREAVES SURVEYMONKEY.COM - ANNUAL FEE 06/25/21 384.00 .00

Total 10-43-150-300.0 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES: 416.22 .00

10-43-150-420.0 TRAVEL AND MEETINGS U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-SPICKARD LIBRARY EXPANSION CHARETTE PUBL 06/25/21 21.35 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-SPICKARD LIBRARY EXPANSION DESIGN PUBLIC 06/25/21 27.04 .00

Total 10-43-150-420.0 TRAVEL AND MEETINGS: 48.39 .00

10-43-150-440.0 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION OF IDAHO CITIES 10703 AIC DUES FY 2022 07/08/21 1,502.00 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-SPICKARD AIC PARKING 06/25/21 15.00 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-SPICKARD AIC PARKING 06/25/21 15.00 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-T MALVICH PARKING AIC MTG 06/25/21 10.75 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-T MALVICH AIC MTG - MEAL 06/25/21 34.70 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-T MALVICH AIC MTG - HOTEL & PARKING 06/25/21 407.42 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WAGNER AIC CONFERENCE - TRACY 06/25/21 33.50 .00

Total 10-43-150-440.0 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT: 2,018.37 .00

10-43-150-460.0 TELEPHONE VERIZON WIRELESS 9881038338 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 06/01/21 126.76 .00 VERIZON WIRELESS 9883190918 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 07/01/21 126.75 .00

Total 10-43-150-460.0 TELEPHONE: 253.51 .00

Total CITY MANAGER: 3,481.92 .00

ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS 10-44-150-200.0 OFFICE SUPPLIES PITNEY BOWES 1018475591 TAPE STRIPS 07/01/21 56.52 .00

Total 10-44-150-200.0 OFFICE SUPPLIES: 56.52 .00

10-44-150-300.0 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES NUESYNERGY INC. 2021-06 COBRA ADMIN FEES 07/08/21 75.00 .00

Total 10-44-150-300.0 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES: 75.00 .00

10-44-150-310.0 ATTORNEY - CIVIL NON-REIMB WHITE PETERSON P.A. 146251 GENERAL CITY ADMIN 06/30/21 7,000.00 .00

Total 10-44-150-310.0 ATTORNEY - CIVIL NON-REIMB: 7,000.00 .00

10-44-150-420.0 TRAVEL AND MEETINGS TREASURE VALLEY COFFEE INC. 2160:07602692 TEA, COCOA, CREAMER, SUGAR 07/12/21 35.93 .00

Total 10-44-150-420.0 TRAVEL AND MEETINGS: 35.93 .00 CITY OF McCALL Payment Approval Report - by GL - Portrait Page: 4 Report dates: 7/2/2021-7/15/2021 Jul 15, 2021 02:35PM

Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Invoice Date Net Invoice Amount Amount Paid Date Paid

10-44-150-450.0 CLEANING AND CUSTODIAL ALSCO LBOI1909307 FLOOR MATS 07/13/21 76.36 .00 MAY HARDWARE INC. 18655 PINE-SOL CLEANER, PET CARPELIMIN 07/12/21 13.64 .00

Total 10-44-150-450.0 CLEANING AND CUSTODIAL: 90.00 .00

10-44-150-460.0 TELEPHONE ZIPLY FIBER 0721-3038 PHONE SERVICE - CITY HALL - 208-634 07/07/21 39.49 .00 ZIPLY FIBER 0721-4493 PHONE SERVICE - CITY HALL - 208-634 07/07/21 38.85 .00

Total 10-44-150-460.0 TELEPHONE: 78.34 .00

10-44-150-500.0 RENTAL - OFFICE EQUIPMENT WELLS FARGO EQUIPMENT FINANCE 5015821715 XEROX C8045 #603-0214726-000 RENT 07/07/21 170.25 .00

Total 10-44-150-500.0 RENTAL - OFFICE EQUIPMENT: 170.25 .00

10-44-150-500.1 RENTAL - EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE BOISE OFFICE EQUIPMENT IN2639059 XEROX XALC8070H2 OVERAGE CHAR 07/12/21 113.71 .00

Total 10-44-150-500.1 RENTAL - EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE: 113.71 .00

Total ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS: 7,619.75 .00

FINANCE 10-45-150-440.0 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION OF IDAHO CITIES 10888 2021 ICCTFOA MEMBERSHIP DUES - S 07/08/21 90.00 .00

Total 10-45-150-440.0 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT: 90.00 .00

Total FINANCE: 90.00 .00

CITY CLERK 10-46-150-210.0 DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WAGNER COLOR TABS, LABELS, LASER LABELS 06/25/21 64.17 .00

Total 10-46-150-210.0 DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES: 64.17 .00

10-46-150-440.0 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION OF IDAHO CITIES 10888 2021 ICCTFOA MEMBERSHIP DUES - T 07/08/21 135.00 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WAGNER AIC CONFERENCE - BESSIEJO, SHAY 06/25/21 63.52 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WAGNER HOTEL FOR AIC CONF AND PARKING - 06/25/21 111.42 .00

Total 10-46-150-440.0 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT: 309.94 .00

10-46-150-598.0 RECORDS DESTRUCTION SHRED-IT USA - BOISE 8182374434 REGULAR SERVICE 07/07/21 457.60 .00

Total 10-46-150-598.0 RECORDS DESTRUCTION: 457.60 .00

Total CITY CLERK: 831.71 .00

LOCAL OPTION TAX DEPARTMENT 10-47-150-610.0 REC & CULTURAL ACTIVITIES (C) McCALL MUSIC SOCIETY INC 21-02 SUMMER MUSIC FESTIVAL 2021 07/13/21 3,000.00 .00

Total 10-47-150-610.0 REC & CULTURAL ACTIVITIES (C): 3,000.00 .00 CITY OF McCALL Payment Approval Report - by GL - Portrait Page: 5 Report dates: 7/2/2021-7/15/2021 Jul 15, 2021 02:35PM

Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Invoice Date Net Invoice Amount Amount Paid Date Paid

10-47-150-630.0 EC GRWTH/MKTG/EVENT PROMO(G) SEVEN DEVILS PLAY FOUNDRY 21-01 LOT DISB. - MARKETING AND PRODUC 07/13/21 2,000.00 .00

Total 10-47-150-630.0 EC GRWTH/MKTG/EVENT PROMO(G): 2,000.00 .00

10-47-150-642.0 PRIOR YEAR LOT - CF MAROSTICA, KURT 439578 Lot Distribution - Housing Unit 6 07/15/21 10,000.00 10,000.00 07/15/2021 MAROSTICA, KURT 439632 Lot Distribution - Housing Unit 5 07/15/21 10,000.00 10,000.00 07/15/2021

Total 10-47-150-642.0 PRIOR YEAR LOT - CF: 20,000.00 20,000.00

10-47-150-650.0 PAVE/PARK/BIKE PATHS/TRANS (A) PAYETTE LAND TRUST INC 21-16 LOT DISB. - PAYETTE RIVER BASIN INIT 07/13/21 5,000.00 .00

Total 10-47-150-650.0 PAVE/PARK/BIKE PATHS/TRANS (A): 5,000.00 .00

10-47-150-670.0 REC & CULTURAL FACILITIES (B) PAYETTE LAKES SKI CLUB 21-13 LOT DISB. - PHASE 2 SKI LIFT AND LIG 07/13/21 25,000.00 .00

Total 10-47-150-670.0 REC & CULTURAL FACILITIES (B): 25,000.00 .00

Total LOCAL OPTION TAX DEPARTMENT: 55,000.00 20,000.00

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 10-48-150-210.0 DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES DLT SOLUTIONS LLC SI511431 AUTOCAD CIVIL 3D ANNUAL RENEWAL 02/26/21 205.80 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-GREAVES BUSINESS CARD - E GREAVES 06/25/21 32.96 .00

Total 10-48-150-210.0 DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES: 238.76 .00

10-48-150-250.0 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBRICANTS CHEVRON TEXACO 72727227-CD FUEL 07/06/21 155.83 .00

Total 10-48-150-250.0 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBRICANTS: 155.83 .00

10-48-150-300.0 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ELAM & BURKE, P.A. 191429 GENERAL 06/30/21 3,080.50 .00 VALLEY COUNTY 20210702 CITY OF MCCALL CONTRIBUTION FOR 07/02/21 35,000.00 .00

Total 10-48-150-300.0 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES: 38,080.50 .00

10-48-150-400.0 ADVERTISING/LEGAL PUBLICATIONS STAR NEWS, THE 56591 LEGAL AD - P & Z HEARING JULY 8 JUN 06/17/21 175.56 .00

Total 10-48-150-400.0 ADVERTISING/LEGAL PUBLICATIONS: 175.56 .00

10-48-150-460.0 TELEPHONE VERIZON WIRELESS 9881038338 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 06/01/21 261.98 .00 VERIZON WIRELESS 9883190918 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 07/01/21 253.11 .00

Total 10-48-150-460.0 TELEPHONE: 515.09 .00

10-48-150-466.0 PUBLIC ART ROCKY MOUNTAIN SIGNS & APPAREL 21282 DECALS - ASPEN MARKET BUS STOP 06/30/21 539.00 .00

Total 10-48-150-466.0 PUBLIC ART: 539.00 .00 CITY OF McCALL Payment Approval Report - by GL - Portrait Page: 6 Report dates: 7/2/2021-7/15/2021 Jul 15, 2021 02:35PM

Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Invoice Date Net Invoice Amount Amount Paid Date Paid

Total COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: 39,704.74 .00

POLICE DEPARTMENT 10-50-100-156.0 CLOTHING/UNIFORMS GALLS 18755764 ALTERATIONS 07/07/21 78.00 .00 GALLS 18774625 2 Jumpsuits for Officer Pape. z 07/09/21 1,193.40 .00 GALLS 18774626 2 Jumpsuits for Officer Jerry Tatum. 07/09/21 1,121.40 .00 UNIFORMS2GEAR INC. 113047 ACADIA BLACK SHOES 04/15/21 554.74 .00

Total 10-50-100-156.0 CLOTHING/UNIFORMS: 2,947.54 .00

10-50-150-210.0 DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES TREASURE VALLEY COFFEE INC. 2160:07650453 COFFEE 07/13/21 143.65 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-KOLANO FLESH LEFT EARMOLD, CLEAR ACOUS 06/25/21 93.95 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-PALMER SUNBLOCK - SWAT TRAINING 06/25/21 21.14 .00

Total 10-50-150-210.0 DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES: 258.74 .00

10-50-150-215.0 RANGE/AMMUNITION SPECIALTY PLASTICS & FAB. INC. 81205-1 SHIPPING 05/25/21 24.99 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-ARRASMITH EAR PROTECTION FOR SWAT TRAININ 06/25/21 181.23 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WILLIAMS 9MM MAGPUMP HOPPER FED DBL STA 06/25/21 144.99 .00

Total 10-50-150-215.0 RANGE/AMMUNITION: 351.21 .00

10-50-150-240.0 MINOR EQUIPMENT U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-KOLANO DIPLOMA COVER 06/25/21 33.98 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-PALMER 45X53 HARD FLOOR 06/25/21 52.99 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-RYSKA PADFOLIO - RESUME 06/25/21 33.56 .00

Total 10-50-150-240.0 MINOR EQUIPMENT: 120.53 .00

10-50-150-250.0 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBRICANTS CHEVRON TEXACO 72728957-PD FUEL 07/06/21 4,267.13 .00 SHELL FLEET PLUS 72747150-PD FUEL 07/06/21 55.08 .00

Total 10-50-150-250.0 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBRICANTS: 4,322.21 .00

10-50-150-260.0 POSTAGE U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-KOLANO POSTAGE 06/25/21 24.90 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-KOLANO POSTAGE 06/25/21 10.54 .00

Total 10-50-150-260.0 POSTAGE: 35.44 .00

10-50-150-300.0 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES C & M LUMBER CO. INC. 20210625 LATE CHG POLICE DEPT 06/25/21 10.75 .00 SHRED-IT USA - BOISE 8182374434 REGULAR SERVICE 07/07/21 163.48 .00

Total 10-50-150-300.0 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES: 174.23 .00

10-50-150-420.0 TRAVEL AND MEETINGS U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-KOLANO COMMUNITY CLEAN UP DAY - PW NICK 06/25/21 32.32 .00

Total 10-50-150-420.0 TRAVEL AND MEETINGS: 32.32 .00

10-50-150-440.0 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT POST ACADEMY, IDAHO S22003817 URBAN RIFLE USERS COURSE - MCPH 07/12/21 120.00 .00 PUBLIC AGENCY TRAINING COUNCIL 256707 OFFICER INVOLVED SHOOTING-3 - JO 06/30/21 750.00 .00 CITY OF McCALL Payment Approval Report - by GL - Portrait Page: 7 Report dates: 7/2/2021-7/15/2021 Jul 15, 2021 02:35PM

Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Invoice Date Net Invoice Amount Amount Paid Date Paid

U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-ARRASMITH SUPERVISORY COURSE - ARRASMITH/ 06/25/21 27.17 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-ARRASMITH SUPERVISORY COURSE - ARRASMITH/ 06/25/21 29.42 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-ARRASMITH SUPERVISORY COURSE - ARRASMITH/ 06/25/21 39.43 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-ARRASMITH SUPERVISORY COURSE - ARRASMITH/ 06/25/21 129.61 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-ARRASMITH SWAT INTERMEDIATE - ARRASMITH,PA 06/25/21 40.42 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-JOHNSON CLS AND SEARCH WARRANTS 06/25/21 9.99 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-PALMER REIMB - MPD206,214,206 06/25/21 44.52 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-PALMER SWAT TRAINING - PALMER, ARRASMIT 06/25/21 79.51 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-PALMER SWAT TRAINING - PALMER, ARRASMIT 06/25/21 119.91 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-RYSKA GLOCK TRAINING - MCPHERSON 06/25/21 250.00 .00

Total 10-50-150-440.0 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT: 1,639.98 .00

10-50-150-450.0 CLEANING AND CUSTODIAL BLUE RIBBON LINEN SUPPLY INC. 273988 FLOOR MATS 07/02/21 25.00 .00

Total 10-50-150-450.0 CLEANING AND CUSTODIAL: 25.00 .00

10-50-150-460.0 TELEPHONE VERIZON WIRELESS 9882802131 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 06/26/21 880.94 .00 VERIZON WIRELESS 9882802131 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 06/26/21 41.74 .00 ZIPLY FIBER 0721-2144 PHONE SERVICE - POLICE - 208-634-21 07/07/21 29.28 .00

Total 10-50-150-460.0 TELEPHONE: 951.96 .00

10-50-150-500.0 RENTAL - OFFICE EQUIPMENT WELLS FARGO EQUIPMENT FINANCE 5015749879-A/PD XEROX C405 #603-0173151 06/27/21 - 0 07/01/21 28.87 .00 WELLS FARGO EQUIPMENT FINANCE 5015749880-PD XEROX C8045 #603-0173257-000 MIN. U 07/01/21 497.69 .00

Total 10-50-150-500.0 RENTAL - OFFICE EQUIPMENT: 526.56 .00

10-50-150-520.1 RENTAL-POLICE DEPT. FACILITIES VALLEY COUNTY 2021-AUGUST PD FACILITY LEASE 07/15/21 2,700.00 .00

Total 10-50-150-520.1 RENTAL-POLICE DEPT. FACILITIES: 2,700.00 .00

10-50-150-580.0 REPAIRS - AUTOMOTIVE EQUIPMENT JERRY'S AUTO PARTS 226922 CABLE TIE, TAPE 06/30/21 17.43 .00 ROCKY MOUNTAIN SIGNS & APPAREL 21303 FLAG DECALS 07/10/21 172.50 .00 TETON COMMUNICATION INC 18664 SHIPPING 06/28/21 25.00 .00 TETON COMMUNICATION INC 18812 VHF SMA ANTENNA 07/09/21 66.00 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-GIESSEN CAR WASH 06/25/21 8.00 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-JOHNSON CAR WASH 06/25/21 8.00 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-KIMMEL CAR WASH 06/25/21 8.00 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-PALMER CAR WASH 06/25/21 8.00 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-PAPE CAR WASH 06/25/21 8.00 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-PAPE CAR WASH 06/25/21 8.00 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-RYSKA FLOORLINER 06/25/21 251.09 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-TATUM CAR WASH 06/25/21 8.00 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WANN CAR WASH 06/25/21 8.00 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WILLIAMS CAR WASH 06/25/21 9.00 .00 ERS EMERGENCY RESPONDER SER 21-233 ID MISC PARTS & MATERIALS 06/29/21 215.00 .00

Total 10-50-150-580.0 REPAIRS - AUTOMOTIVE EQUIPMENT: 820.02 .00

Total POLICE DEPARTMENT: 14,905.74 .00 CITY OF McCALL Payment Approval Report - by GL - Portrait Page: 8 Report dates: 7/2/2021-7/15/2021 Jul 15, 2021 02:35PM

Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Invoice Date Net Invoice Amount Amount Paid Date Paid

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 10-70-600-710.0 GENERAL FUND CIP HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC. 62645 TASK 21-17 SURVEY SERVICES 07/14/21 1,399.55 .00

Total 10-70-600-710.0 GENERAL FUND CIP: 1,399.55 .00

10-70-750-997.0 FRANCHISE FEES - CONTINGENCY FALVEY'S LLC 8 PARK STREET AND THOMPSON AVE R 06/18/21 676.55 .00 HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC. 62645 PH 17-03 C 2ND STREET AND LENORA 07/14/21 299.73 .00 HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC. 62645 PH 19-06A PHASE 2B SURFACE IMPRO 07/14/21 267.03 .00

Total 10-70-750-997.0 FRANCHISE FEES - CONTINGENCY: 1,243.31 .00

Total CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN: 2,642.86 .00

Total GENERAL FUND: 129,004.07 20,000.00

PUBLIC WORKS & STREETS FUND PUBLIC WORKS & STREETS 24-55-100-156.0 CLOTHING/UNIFORMS RIDLEY'S FAMILY MARKETS 0000131025 WORK PANTS - PHILLIP GEORGE 07/10/21 193.39 .00

Total 24-55-100-156.0 CLOTHING/UNIFORMS: 193.39 .00

24-55-100-160.0 EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WEAVER EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION 06/25/21 98.02 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WEAVER EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION 06/25/21 169.00 .00

Total 24-55-100-160.0 EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION: 267.02 .00

24-55-150-210.0 DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES ROCKY MOUNTAIN SIGNS & APPAREL 21263 COREX SIGN 07/08/21 27.50 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WEAVER MECHANICAL PENCIL 06/25/21 25.47 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WEAVER BIC PENS, CALCULATOR 06/25/21 30.45 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WEAVER CLOCK WILL RETURN, WILL BE BACK 06/25/21 5.95 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WEAVER NOTEBOOKS, CALCULATOR 06/25/21 26.43 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WEAVER MONITOR RISERS 06/25/21 58.42 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WEAVER STICKY NOTES 06/25/21 11.91 .00

Total 24-55-150-210.0 DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES: 186.13 .00

24-55-150-211.0 MECHANIC SHOP SUPPLIES JERRY'S AUTO PARTS 227901 CABIN AIR FILTER 07/06/21 13.42 .00 JERRY'S AUTO PARTS 228756 9 PC INSERT BIT SET 07/09/21 9.49 .00 MAY HARDWARE INC. 17570 MISC FASTENERS 07/01/21 1.08 .00 MAY HARDWARE INC. 18839 EMT COMP BOX CONNECTOR 07/14/21 1.34 .00 UTILITY TRAILER SALES OF BOISE 69539PB 4" ROUND S 07/12/21 33.80 .00 GRAINGER 9948940300 HANDTRUCK, BATTERY BOX 06/29/21 91.73 .00

Total 24-55-150-211.0 MECHANIC SHOP SUPPLIES: 150.86 .00

24-55-150-250.0 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBRICANTS A & I DISTRIBUTORS 3655433 5 GAL PRO NON-CLR BRK PTS CLN 07/07/21 179.36 .00 CHEVRON TEXACO 72728958-PW FUEL 07/06/21 2,660.82 .00

Total 24-55-150-250.0 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBRICANTS: 2,840.18 .00 CITY OF McCALL Payment Approval Report - by GL - Portrait Page: 9 Report dates: 7/2/2021-7/15/2021 Jul 15, 2021 02:35PM

Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Invoice Date Net Invoice Amount Amount Paid Date Paid

24-55-150-260.0 POSTAGE U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WEAVER POSTAGE 06/25/21 10.60 .00

Total 24-55-150-260.0 POSTAGE: 10.60 .00

24-55-150-300.0 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES C & M LUMBER CO. INC. 20210625 LATE CHG STREETS DEPT 06/25/21 10.75 .00

Total 24-55-150-300.0 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES: 10.75 .00

24-55-150-440.0 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT DLT SOLUTIONS LLC SI511431 AUTOCAD CIVIL 3D ANNUAL RENEWAL 02/26/21 2,703.46 .00

Total 24-55-150-440.0 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT: 2,703.46 .00

24-55-150-460.0 TELEPHONE VERIZON WIRELESS 9881038338 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 06/01/21 358.35 .00 VERIZON WIRELESS 9883190918 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 07/01/21 361.46 .00 ZIPLY FIBER 0721-4170 PHONE SERVICE - CITY SHOP - 208-63 07/07/21 44.83 .00

Total 24-55-150-460.0 TELEPHONE: 764.64 .00

24-55-150-500.1 RENTAL - EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE BOISE OFFICE EQUIPMENT IN2639059 XEROX XALC8045'S OVERAGE CHARG 07/12/21 32.48 .00

Total 24-55-150-500.1 RENTAL - EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE: 32.48 .00

24-55-150-543.0 STREET REPAIR - DUST ABATEMENT ROADWISE INC. 21-3578 DUST ABATEMENT 07/12/21 5,851.28 .00 ROADWISE INC. 21-3579 DUST ABATEMENT 07/12/21 5,859.83 .00

Total 24-55-150-543.0 STREET REPAIR - DUST ABATEMENT: 11,711.11 .00

24-55-150-547.0 SIGNS & POSTS DANNY'S WELDING INC. 21-802 18.3x2"x1/4 FLAT BAR 07/11/21 57.55 .00 MAY HARDWARE INC. 18123 CLEAR COATED CABLE, WIRE ROPE C 07/07/21 10.70 .00 MAY HARDWARE INC. 18843 DUCT TAPE 07/14/21 16.17 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WEAVER BOAT LINES & DOCK TIES 06/25/21 29.95- .00

Total 24-55-150-547.0 SIGNS & POSTS: 54.47 .00

24-55-150-549.0 STREET REPAIR -STREET PAINTING CURTIS CLEAN SWEEP INC. 163901 4" PAINTED LINES (LNFT) 06/30/21 16,404.66 .00 CURTIS CLEAN SWEEP INC. 163901 PAINTED SHARED LANE MARKINGS 06/30/21 1,867.24 .00 CURTIS CLEAN SWEEP INC. 163901 PAINTED CROSSWALK MARKINGS 06/30/21 3,825.00 .00 CURTIS CLEAN SWEEP INC. 163901 PAINTED STOP BARS 06/30/21 480.00 .00 CURTIS CLEAN SWEEP INC. 163901 MOBILIZATION 06/30/21 4,000.00 .00 CURTIS CLEAN SWEEP INC. 163901 PAINTED TURN ARROWS 06/30/21 746.34 .00 JERRY'S AUTO PARTS 228414 WHITE LITHIUM GREASE 07/08/21 19.14 .00 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO., THE 2833-3 GLSBEAD IDAC110 50#B 07/08/21 59.48 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621 - MALVICH VARIOUS ROAD PAINTING STENCILS 06/25/21 1,255.00 .00

Total 24-55-150-549.0 STREET REPAIR -STREET PAINTING: 28,656.86 .00

24-55-150-580.0 REPAIRS - AUTOMOTIVE EQUIPMENT COASTLINE EQUIPMENT CO. 817412 FILTER ELE 07/12/21 93.07 .00 JERRY'S AUTO PARTS 210052 HYDRAULIC FILTER 03/25/21 9.68 .00 JERRY'S AUTO PARTS 226611 FUEL SENDERS 06/29/21 25.62 .00 CITY OF McCALL Payment Approval Report - by GL - Portrait Page: 10 Report dates: 7/2/2021-7/15/2021 Jul 15, 2021 02:35PM

Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Invoice Date Net Invoice Amount Amount Paid Date Paid

JERRY'S AUTO PARTS 226641 GAUGE 06/29/21 34.67 .00 JERRY'S AUTO PARTS 227848 OIL FILTER 07/06/21 21.95 .00 JERRY'S AUTO PARTS 228644 BATTERY ACCESSORIES 07/09/21 10.75 .00 JERRY'S AUTO PARTS 228753 OIL FILTERS 07/09/21 42.68 .00 JERRY'S AUTO PARTS 228780 FUEL FILTER 07/09/21 116.16 .00 JERRY'S AUTO PARTS 229423 OIL FILTER 07/13/21 5.05 .00 MAY HARDWARE INC. 18806 THREADED STEEL ROD, WASP & HOR 07/13/21 7.19 .00 MAY HARDWARE INC. 18810 THREADED STEEL ROD 07/13/21 9.44 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621 - MALVICH ITD HQ VEHICLE REGISTRATIONS 06/25/21 23.69 .00 UTILITY TRAILER SALES OF BOISE 69578PB LUBERFINER 07/12/21 21.78 .00

Total 24-55-150-580.0 REPAIRS - AUTOMOTIVE EQUIPMENT: 421.73 .00

24-55-200-701.0 FACILITY PLAN & IMPROVEMENTS HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC. 62645 TASK 21-17 SURVEY SERVICES 07/14/21 1,324.79 .00

Total 24-55-200-701.0 FACILITY PLAN & IMPROVEMENTS: 1,324.79 .00

24-55-200-714.0 PARK STREET STREETSCAPE IMPROV FALVEY'S LLC 8 PARK STREET AND THOMPSON AVE R 06/18/21 3,827.95 .00

Total 24-55-200-714.0 PARK STREET STREETSCAPE IMPROV: 3,827.95 .00

Total PUBLIC WORKS & STREETS: 53,156.42 .00

Total PUBLIC WORKS & STREETS FUND: 53,156.42 .00

LIBRARY FUND LIBRARY DEPARTMENT 25-57-150-234.0 SOFTWARE U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-LOJEK ZOOM SUBSCRIPTION 06/25/21 14.99 .00

Total 25-57-150-234.0 SOFTWARE: 14.99 .00

25-57-150-300.0 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SHADOW TRACKERS RDK210437 BACKGROUND CHECKS 06/30/21 30.00 .00

Total 25-57-150-300.0 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES: 30.00 .00

25-57-150-435.0 BOOKS/PUBLICATIONS/SUBSCRIPTS BAKER & TAYLOR BOOKS 2036062428 BOOKS 06/30/21 99.51 .00 BAKER & TAYLOR BOOKS 2036081014 BOOKS 07/12/21 16.09 .00 GALE/CENGAGE LEARNING INC 74574730 BOOK 06/25/21 27.19 .00 OVERDRIVE INC. 4258CO21288706 EBOOKS 07/09/21 62.50 .00

Total 25-57-150-435.0 BOOKS/PUBLICATIONS/SUBSCRIPTS: 205.29 .00

25-57-150-436.0 OCLC SUBSCRIPTION OCLC INC. 1000136670 CATALOGING/METADATA GROUP SVCS 07/01/21 1,500.00 .00

Total 25-57-150-436.0 OCLC SUBSCRIPTION: 1,500.00 .00

25-57-150-460.0 TELEPHONE VERIZON WIRELESS 9881038338 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 06/01/21 41.74 .00 VERIZON WIRELESS 9883190918 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 07/01/21 41.73 .00

Total 25-57-150-460.0 TELEPHONE: 83.47 .00 CITY OF McCALL Payment Approval Report - by GL - Portrait Page: 11 Report dates: 7/2/2021-7/15/2021 Jul 15, 2021 02:35PM

Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Invoice Date Net Invoice Amount Amount Paid Date Paid

25-57-150-464.0 PERIODICALS U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-LOJEK WALL STREET JOURNAL 06/25/21 180.20 .00

Total 25-57-150-464.0 PERIODICALS: 180.20 .00

25-57-150-465.0 CHILDREN'S BOOKS BAKER & TAYLOR BOOKS 0003241599 CHILDREN'S BOOKS 07/08/21 20.62- .00

Total 25-57-150-465.0 CHILDREN'S BOOKS: 20.62- .00

25-57-150-468.0 FRIENDS-BOOKS/MATERIALS, ETC. U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-LOJEK MOVIE LICENSING 06/25/21 225.00 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-LOJEK BOOK COVERS 06/25/21 56.00 .00

Total 25-57-150-468.0 FRIENDS-BOOKS/MATERIALS, ETC.: 281.00 .00

25-57-150-469.0 PROGRAMMING SUPPLIES ALBERTSONS LLC 00438648-070221-3 SUMMER PROGRAMMING SUPPLIES 07/02/21 24.34 .00 FLORANCE JOHNET BEAVER 20210629 MCCALL CITY LIBRARY MATCHING ICE 06/29/21 30.00 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-LOJEK PROGRAMMING SUPPLIES 06/25/21 329.00 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-LOJEK ALL IN ONE VIRTUAL REALITY HEADSE 06/25/21 375.92 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-LOJEK PINBACK BUTTON SET 06/25/21 50.60 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-LOJEK MOVIE LICENSING 06/25/21 70.00 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-LOJEK BOOK COVERS 06/25/21 17.48 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-LOJEK FIRST BOOK 06/25/21 74.19 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-LOJEK FIRST BOOK 06/25/21 4.80 .00

Total 25-57-150-469.0 PROGRAMMING SUPPLIES: 976.33 .00

25-57-150-500.1 RENTAL - EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE BOISE OFFICE EQUIPMENT IN2639059 XEROX XALC8045'S OVERAGE CHARG 07/12/21 53.63 .00

Total 25-57-150-500.1 RENTAL - EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE: 53.63 .00

Total LIBRARY DEPARTMENT: 3,304.29 .00

Total LIBRARY FUND: 3,304.29 .00

RECREATION FUND RECREATION - PROGRAMS 28-58-150-210.0 DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES ALBERTSONS LLC 00668465-062821-3 MOUNTAIN BIKE CLASS 06/28/21 55.90 .00 ALBERTSONS LLC 00806815-070621-3 COORDINATER BEVERAGES - PICKLEB 07/06/21 3.99 .00 C & M LUMBER CO. INC. 455723 BALLFIELDS/SOCCERFIELDS 07/09/21 187.35 .00 MAY HARDWARE INC. 17521 MARK PAINT 06/30/21 17.79 .00 MAY HARDWARE INC. 18321 TARPCOVER, HNDSOAP 07/08/21 13.93 .00 MAY HARDWARE INC. 18687 CABLE TIES 07/12/21 8.98 .00 RIDLEY'S FAMILY MARKETS 1001260109 PROGRAM - ICE 07/12/21 6.86 .00 RIDLEY'S FAMILY MARKETS 6000531209 PROGRAM - ICE 07/05/21 2.19 .00

Total 28-58-150-210.0 DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES: 296.99 .00

28-58-150-300.0 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HIETALA PHOTOGRAPHY 20210604 TEAM PHOTOS - YOUTH SPORTS 06/04/21 380.00 .00 SHADOW TRACKERS RDK210437 BACKGROUND CHECKS 06/30/21 30.00 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-LOJEK MOVIE LICENSING 06/25/21 150.00 .00 SPANGENBERG, NOAH 20210701 MOUNTAIN BIKE INSTRUCTOR 07/01/21 72.00 .00 CAREY, ELLA 20210701 MT BIKE SEASON 1 07/01/21 96.00 .00 CITY OF McCALL Payment Approval Report - by GL - Portrait Page: 12 Report dates: 7/2/2021-7/15/2021 Jul 15, 2021 02:35PM

Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Invoice Date Net Invoice Amount Amount Paid Date Paid

SPANGENBERG, ZOE 20210701 MOUNTAIN BIKE INSTRUCTOR - 8HR 07/01/21 96.00 .00

Total 28-58-150-300.0 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES: 824.00 .00

28-58-150-460.0 TELEPHONE VERIZON WIRELESS 9881038338 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 06/01/21 133.49 .00 VERIZON WIRELESS 9883190918 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 07/01/21 133.47 .00

Total 28-58-150-460.0 TELEPHONE: 266.96 .00

28-58-150-500.0 RENTAL - OFFICE EQUIPMENT WELLS FARGO EQUIPMENT FINANCE 5015726391-PR XEROX C7025 #6030192296000 MIN US 06/29/21 221.31 .00

Total 28-58-150-500.0 RENTAL - OFFICE EQUIPMENT: 221.31 .00

Total RECREATION - PROGRAMS: 1,609.26 .00

RECREATION - PARKS 28-59-150-210.0 DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES ALBERTSONS LLC 00729510-051921-3 DEPT. SNACKS - PARKS 05/19/21 60.68 .00 DLT SOLUTIONS LLC SI511431 AUTOCAD CIVIL 3D ANNUAL RENEWAL 02/26/21 205.80 .00 MAY HARDWARE INC. 12636 BIG ORANGE WEDGE 05/18/21 11.98 .00 MAY HARDWARE INC. 16442 PARACORD 06/21/21 15.29 .00 MAY HARDWARE INC. 17461 COFFEE MAKER, FILTERS 06/30/21 43.18 .00 MAY HARDWARE INC. 17481 COFFEE FILTERS 06/30/21 4.05 .00 MAY HARDWARE INC. 17565 DEEP WOODS 07/01/21 43.13 .00 MAY HARDWARE INC. 18005 WORK GLOVES 07/06/21 8.63 .00 MAY HARDWARE INC. 18622 TRASH CAN, SPRY PNT, KEY 07/12/21 218.81 .00

Total 28-59-150-210.0 DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES: 611.55 .00

28-59-150-211.0 BATHROOM SUPPLIES GEM STATE PAPER & SUPPLY 3041036 45 GALLON BAGS 06/30/21 316.80 .00

Total 28-59-150-211.0 BATHROOM SUPPLIES: 316.80 .00

28-59-150-216.0 SUPPLIES - SEED, SOD WILBUR-ELLIS COMPANY LLC 14435537 RYE SEED, BLUE/RYE SEED 06/29/21 460.00 .00

Total 28-59-150-216.0 SUPPLIES - SEED, SOD: 460.00 .00

28-59-150-222.0 CHEMICALS MAY HARDWARE INC. 18264 HOUSING O RING 07/08/21 7.18 .00 STAR NEWS, THE 56685 Noxious Weed Ads will run during Pull Tog 07/08/21 480.00 .00 WILBUR-ELLIS COMPANY LLC 14435537 Chemical Order 06/29/21 399.50 .00

Total 28-59-150-222.0 CHEMICALS: 886.68 .00

28-59-150-223.0 FLOWERS FRANZ WITTE - McCALL LLC 220000025628 INSECT/DIS/MITE 07/12/21 7.35 .00

Total 28-59-150-223.0 FLOWERS: 7.35 .00

28-59-150-226.0 IRRIGATION-CTRL ID HIST MUSEUM MCCALL, CITY OF 0721-152751 WATER 07/13/21 29.25 .00

Total 28-59-150-226.0 IRRIGATION-CTRL ID HIST MUSEUM: 29.25 .00 CITY OF McCALL Payment Approval Report - by GL - Portrait Page: 13 Report dates: 7/2/2021-7/15/2021 Jul 15, 2021 02:35PM

Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Invoice Date Net Invoice Amount Amount Paid Date Paid

28-59-150-227.0 IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE MAY HARDWARE INC. 16969 ELBOW, BUSHING, TEE, FEMALE ADAP 06/25/21 16.10 .00 MAY HARDWARE INC. 17565 IRRIGATION PARTS 07/01/21 88.91 .00 MAY HARDWARE INC. 17578 IRRIGATION PARTS 07/01/21 37.58 .00 MAY HARDWARE INC. 17695 COUPLER, LID VALVE BOX 07/02/21 18.88 .00 MAY HARDWARE INC. 17708 IRRIGATION PARTS 07/02/21 50.74 .00 MAY HARDWARE INC. 18049 TEE, INSERT COUPLING, ADAPTER 07/06/21 8.21 .00 MAY HARDWARE INC. 18154 IRRIGATION PARTS 07/07/21 46.80 .00 MAY HARDWARE INC. 18194 ELBOW, BARB 07/07/21 5.00 .00 MAY HARDWARE INC. 18277 HOSE END MALE, GARDEN HOSE 07/08/21 39.58 .00 SILVER CREEK SUPPLY LLC 4760709-001 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 06/25/21 788.66 .00

Total 28-59-150-227.0 IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE: 1,100.46 .00

28-59-150-240.0 MINOR EQUIPMENT MAY HARDWARE INC. 18377 TUNE UP, MISC SHOP SUPPLIES, STIHL 07/09/21 459.94 .00

Total 28-59-150-240.0 MINOR EQUIPMENT: 459.94 .00

28-59-150-250.0 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBRICANTS SINCLAIR OIL CORP 72589976-PR FUEL 06/30/21 196.76 .00

Total 28-59-150-250.0 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBRICANTS: 196.76 .00

28-59-150-300.0 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES C & M LUMBER CO. INC. 20210625 LATE CHG PARKS DEPT 06/25/21 10.74 .00 SHADOW TRACKERS RDK210437 BACKGROUND CHECKS 06/30/21 30.00 .00

Total 28-59-150-300.0 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES: 40.74 .00

28-59-150-400.0 ADVERTISING/LEGAL PUBLICATIONS STAR NEWS, THE 56697 DISPLAY AD - HELP WANTED - PARKS J 07/08/21 198.00 .00

Total 28-59-150-400.0 ADVERTISING/LEGAL PUBLICATIONS: 198.00 .00

28-59-150-460.0 TELEPHONE VERIZON WIRELESS 9881038338 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 06/01/21 165.76 .00 VERIZON WIRELESS 9883190918 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 07/01/21 165.20 .00

Total 28-59-150-460.0 TELEPHONE: 330.96 .00

28-59-150-570.0 REPAIRS - BUILDING AND GROUNDS BUILDERS FIRSTSOURCE INC. 83673187 2X2-8 FURRING STRIP 06/30/21 45.87 .00 BUILDERS FIRSTSOURCE INC. 83683826 4X4-10' #2 HF TRTD GC ICT 07/01/21 80.74 .00 MAY HARDWARE INC. 14955 COUNTERSINK, MISC FASTENERS 06/08/21 15.28 .00 MAY HARDWARE INC. 16144 HOG RINGS 06/18/21 27.68 .00 TOM MECKEL SAND & GRAVEL INC. 2021-2812 1 YARD DRAIN ROCK 06/30/21 36.00 .00

Total 28-59-150-570.0 REPAIRS - BUILDING AND GROUNDS: 205.57 .00

28-59-150-590.0 REPAIRS - OTHER EQUIPMENT JERRY'S AUTO PARTS 223842 O-RING 06/15/21 .92 .00 JERRY'S AUTO PARTS 227970 TRAILER BALL, PIN CLIP 07/06/21 21.43 .00 JERRY'S AUTO PARTS 228202 MOTOR TUNE-UP, FUEL FILTER, CLEAR 07/07/21 35.72 .00 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 9308587633 BENT PULL HITCH PIN STEEL 07/02/21 13.56 .00

Total 28-59-150-590.0 REPAIRS - OTHER EQUIPMENT: 71.63 .00 CITY OF McCALL Payment Approval Report - by GL - Portrait Page: 14 Report dates: 7/2/2021-7/15/2021 Jul 15, 2021 02:35PM

Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Invoice Date Net Invoice Amount Amount Paid Date Paid

28-59-200-714.0 BROWN PARK / EAST LAKE STR WF DROULARD LAND SURVEYING 4480 BROWN PARK FIELD GPS SURVEY 07/01/21 260.00 .00 FALVEY'S LLC 1 E LAKE ST WATERFRONT & BROWN PA 07/13/21 103,712.45 .00 HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC. 62645 TASK 20-09 BROWN PARK SLOPE STAB 07/14/21 104.80 .00 HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC. 62645 TASK 21-05 BROWN PARK IMPROVEME 07/14/21 1,688.53 .00

Total 28-59-200-714.0 BROWN PARK / EAST LAKE STR WF: 105,765.78 .00

Total RECREATION - PARKS: 110,681.47 .00

Total RECREATION FUND: 112,290.73 .00

AIRPORT FUND AIRPORT DEPARTMENT 29-56-150-210.0 DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES WELLS FARGO EQUIPMENT FINANCE 5015749879-A/PD XEROX C405 #603-0173151 06/27/21 - 0 07/01/21 28.86 .00

Total 29-56-150-210.0 DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES: 28.86 .00

29-56-150-250.0 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBRICANTS JERRY'S AUTO PARTS 227914 PREM TRACTOR FL 07/06/21 357.55 .00

Total 29-56-150-250.0 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBRICANTS: 357.55 .00

29-56-150-460.0 TELEPHONE VERIZON WIRELESS 9881038338 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 06/01/21 123.49 .00 VERIZON WIRELESS 9883190918 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 07/01/21 123.47 .00 ZIPLY FIBER 0721-0267 PHONE SERVICE - AIRPORT - 208-196-0 07/01/21 65.03 .00

Total 29-56-150-460.0 TELEPHONE: 311.99 .00

29-56-150-570.0 REPAIRS - BUILDING AND GROUNDS D & B SUPPLY CO. 61875 BROMACIL, GLYPHOSATE PLUS, HI LIG 07/07/21 317.94 .00

Total 29-56-150-570.0 REPAIRS - BUILDING AND GROUNDS: 317.94 .00

29-56-150-580.0 REPAIRS - AUTOMOTIVE EQUIPMENT JERRY'S AUTO PARTS 227284 OIL & FUEL FILTER, HYDRAULIC FILTE 07/02/21 146.95 .00 JERRY'S AUTO PARTS 227290 FUEL FILTER 07/02/21 7.36 .00 JERRY'S AUTO PARTS 227293 AIR FILTER 07/02/21 82.60 .00 JERRY'S AUTO PARTS 227295 CABIN AIR FILTER 07/02/21 30.26 .00

Total 29-56-150-580.0 REPAIRS - AUTOMOTIVE EQUIPMENT: 267.17 .00

29-56-150-590.0 REPAIRS - AIRPORT EQUIPMENT U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-STEIN POSTAGE 06/25/21 12.40 .00

Total 29-56-150-590.0 REPAIRS - AIRPORT EQUIPMENT: 12.40 .00

Total AIRPORT DEPARTMENT: 1,295.91 .00

GRANT EXPENSES 29-60-250-730.0 FEDERAL - AIP PROJECT CURTIS CLEAN SWEEP INC. 163939 Repainting Runway Markings using fundin 06/30/21 12,827.03 .00

Total 29-60-250-730.0 FEDERAL - AIP PROJECT: 12,827.03 .00 CITY OF McCALL Payment Approval Report - by GL - Portrait Page: 15 Report dates: 7/2/2021-7/15/2021 Jul 15, 2021 02:35PM

Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Invoice Date Net Invoice Amount Amount Paid Date Paid

Total GRANT EXPENSES: 12,827.03 .00

Total AIRPORT FUND: 14,122.94 .00

LOCAL OPTION TAX FUND LOCAL OPTION TAX DEPARTMENT 31-49-200-702.0 MAINTENANCE IMPROVMNT PROJECTS GRANITE EXCAVATION INC. 1 MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT PROJE 07/06/21 905,395.22 .00 HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC. 62645 TASK 21-01A FY2021 SPRING MOUNT 07/14/21 7,168.51 .00

Total 31-49-200-702.0 MAINTENANCE IMPROVMNT PROJECTS: 912,563.73 .00

31-49-200-704.0 DOWNTOWN CORE REDEVELOPMENT HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC. 62645 PH 17-03 C 2ND STREET AND LENORA 07/14/21 4,695.79 .00 HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC. 62645 PH 19-06A PHASE 2B SURFACE IMPRO 07/14/21 1,068.13 .00 HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC. 62645 TASK 21-13 DOWNTOWN CORE PHASE 07/14/21 437.44 .00 HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC. 62645 TASK 21-17 SURVEY SERVICES 07/14/21 1,623.88 .00

Total 31-49-200-704.0 DOWNTOWN CORE REDEVELOPMENT: 7,825.24 .00

31-49-200-707.0 E. DEINHARD LANE RECON. HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC. 62645 TASK 21-17 SURVEY SERVICES 07/14/21 1,474.34 .00

Total 31-49-200-707.0 E. DEINHARD LANE RECON.: 1,474.34 .00

Total LOCAL OPTION TAX DEPARTMENT: 921,863.31 .00

31-60-250-110.0 STP RURAL GRANT FORSGREN ASSOCIATES INC 221194 02-19-0176 MISSION ST, SOUTH CITY LI 05/25/21 4,227.95 .00

Total 31-60-250-110.0 STP RURAL GRANT: 4,227.95 .00

31-60-250-111.0 STP RURAL GRANT - CITY MATCH FORSGREN ASSOCIATES INC 221194 02-19-0176 MISSION ST, SOUTH CITY LI 05/25/21 334.91 .00

Total 31-60-250-111.0 STP RURAL GRANT - CITY MATCH: 334.91 .00

Total : 4,562.86 .00

Total LOCAL OPTION TAX FUND: 926,426.17 .00

GOLF FUND GOLF OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT 54-85-150-210.0 DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES ALSCO LBOI1907514 LAUNDRY 07/06/21 39.67 .00 ALSCO LBOI1909301 LAUNDRY 07/13/21 39.67 .00 JERRY'S AUTO PARTS 229370 SPEC ADH RMVR 07/13/21 20.06 .00 ROCKY MOUNTAIN SIGNS & APPAREL 21234 H-STANDS - 6 06/30/21 11.10 .00

Total 54-85-150-210.0 DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES: 110.50 .00

54-85-150-222.0 CHEMICALS WILBUR-ELLIS COMPANY LLC 14412283 Gallon of Briskway Fungicide 06/23/21 1,246.00 .00

Total 54-85-150-222.0 CHEMICALS: 1,246.00 .00 CITY OF McCALL Payment Approval Report - by GL - Portrait Page: 16 Report dates: 7/2/2021-7/15/2021 Jul 15, 2021 02:35PM

Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Invoice Date Net Invoice Amount Amount Paid Date Paid

54-85-150-227.0 IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE PACIFIC GOLF & TURF LLC 01-121581 RNB-950 INTERNAL 22 RAINBIRD1 07/02/21 868.80 .00 SILVER CREEK SUPPLY LLC 4776787-001 FLOW CONTROL COMPRESSION COU 06/30/21 92.74 .00

Total 54-85-150-227.0 IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE: 961.54 .00

54-85-150-240.0 MINOR EQUIPMENT U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-MCCORMICK IRONTON ATV SPOT SPRAYER 06/25/21 159.58 .00

Total 54-85-150-240.0 MINOR EQUIPMENT: 159.58 .00

54-85-150-300.0 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES C & M LUMBER CO. INC. 20210625 LATE CHG GOLF DEPT 06/25/21 10.75 .00 SHADOW TRACKERS RDK210437 BACKGROUND CHECKS 06/30/21 90.00 .00

Total 54-85-150-300.0 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES: 100.75 .00

54-85-150-460.0 TELEPHONE VERIZON WIRELESS 9881038338 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 06/01/21 41.74 .00 VERIZON WIRELESS 9883190918 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 07/01/21 50.56 .00

Total 54-85-150-460.0 TELEPHONE: 92.30 .00

54-85-150-570.0 REPAIRS - BUILDING AND GROUNDS MAY HARDWARE INC. 18292 PAINT 07/08/21 17.96 .00

Total 54-85-150-570.0 REPAIRS - BUILDING AND GROUNDS: 17.96 .00

54-85-150-575.0 REPAIRS - CLUBHOUSE MAY HARDWARE INC. 18298 SPUN POLY FILTER 07/08/21 8.99 .00 MAY HARDWARE INC. 18393 HOSE MENDER, HEX BUSHING, COMP 07/09/21 53.23 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-MCCORMICK POWER AMP, 18'DESK BASE CARD MIC 06/25/21 707.99 .00

Total 54-85-150-575.0 REPAIRS - CLUBHOUSE: 770.21 .00

54-85-150-590.0 REPAIRS - OTHER EQUIPMENT C & B OPERATIONS LLC 11249055 EQUIPMENT PARTS 07/01/21 265.39 .00 TURF EQUIPMENT & IRRIGATION 456428-00 OIL FILTER, AIR CLEANER, AIR FILTER 06/29/21 191.87 .00 TURF EQUIPMENT & IRRIGATION 760891-00 LIFT ARM, HYD CYLINDER, 07/12/21 .00 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-MCCORMICK TRIMMER HEAD SPRINGS 06/25/21 19.02 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-MCCORMICK ANTENNA, BATTERY 06/25/21 160.03 .00

Total 54-85-150-590.0 REPAIRS - OTHER EQUIPMENT: 636.31 .00

Total GOLF OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT: 4,095.15 .00

Total GOLF FUND: 4,095.15 .00

WATER FUND WATER DISTRIBUTION 60-64-100-160.0 EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WEAVER EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION 06/25/21 37.80 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WEAVER EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION 06/25/21 65.00 .00

Total 60-64-100-160.0 EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION: 102.80 .00

60-64-150-200.0 OFFICE SUPPLIES U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-SIMS 2 HARDSHELL CASES, 2 KEYBOARD C 06/25/21 49.97 .00 CITY OF McCALL Payment Approval Report - by GL - Portrait Page: 17 Report dates: 7/2/2021-7/15/2021 Jul 15, 2021 02:35PM

Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Invoice Date Net Invoice Amount Amount Paid Date Paid

U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-SIMS 1 HARD CASE 2 KEYBOARD COVER 06/25/21 31.97- .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-SIMS 1 HARD CASE 06/25/21 17.99- .00

Total 60-64-150-200.0 OFFICE SUPPLIES: .01 .00

60-64-150-210.0 DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES MAY HARDWARE INC. 15401 HOSE ADAPTER, FLR CONCTR, FLARE 06/11/21 12.21 .00 MAY HARDWARE INC. 15884 D BATTERY 06/16/21 18.99 .00 MAY HARDWARE INC. 16158 MISC FASTENERS 06/18/21 4.50 .00 MAY HARDWARE INC. 16263 ARMER ALL 06/19/21 8.99 .00 MAY HARDWARE INC. 16329 STEP STOOL 06/20/21 58.49 .00 MAY HARDWARE INC. 16340 POWER CORD, LIGHTED CONNECTOR, 06/20/21 43.17 .00

Total 60-64-150-210.0 DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES: 146.35 .00

60-64-150-250.0 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBRICANTS CHEVRON TEXACO 72727280-WT FUEL 07/06/21 854.02 .00

Total 60-64-150-250.0 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBRICANTS: 854.02 .00

60-64-150-300.0 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FERGUSON WATERWORKS SC32628 JUNE 06/30/21 4.75 .00

Total 60-64-150-300.0 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES: 4.75 .00

60-64-150-350.0 ENGINEER SERVICES HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC. 62645 TASK 21-02 2021 McCall Miscellaneous 07/14/21 695.13 .00

Total 60-64-150-350.0 ENGINEER SERVICES: 695.13 .00

60-64-150-440.0 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT IDAHO RURAL WATER ASSOCIATION 18643 DUES - SYSTEM 1001-9999 7/1/21-6/30/ 06/29/21 267.50 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-SIMS NMEC EXAM 06/25/21 25.00 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-SIMS DWD2-22172 LICENSE 06/25/21 30.00 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-SIMS FUEL FOR TESTING 06/25/21 68.04 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-SIMS AWWA/DUES 06/25/21 377.00 .00

Total 60-64-150-440.0 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT: 767.54 .00

60-64-150-460.0 TELEPHONE VERIZON WIRELESS 9881038338 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 06/01/21 1,360.10 .00 VERIZON WIRELESS 9883190918 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 07/01/21 292.90 .00

Total 60-64-150-460.0 TELEPHONE: 1,653.00 .00

60-64-150-580.0 REPAIRS - AUTOMOTIVE EQUIPMENT JERRY'S AUTO PARTS 221138 FLYWHEEL 06/01/21 93.40 .00

Total 60-64-150-580.0 REPAIRS - AUTOMOTIVE EQUIPMENT: 93.40 .00

60-64-150-590.0 REPAIRS - OTHER EQUIPMENT FERGUSON WATERWORKS 779594 SGL SSSTRP SDL 04/30/21 316.68 .00 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 786395-1 16 SLIP VLV BX TOP SECT 07/01/21 332.01 .00 GRANITE EXCAVATION INC. 14677 MATHER/BURNS ASPHALT REPAIR 06/30/21 3,104.37 .00 POLLARDWATER.COM 195227 2-1/2 MNST X FNST CB HYD GATE VLV 07/13/21 389.14 .00 PUMPTECH INC 0167709-IN JOHN CRANE SEAL 03/31/21 447.90 .00 CITY OF McCALL Payment Approval Report - by GL - Portrait Page: 18 Report dates: 7/2/2021-7/15/2021 Jul 15, 2021 02:35PM

Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Invoice Date Net Invoice Amount Amount Paid Date Paid

Total 60-64-150-590.0 REPAIRS - OTHER EQUIPMENT: 4,590.10 .00

60-64-150-591.0 REPAIRS - WATER METERS/MXU'S FERGUSON WATERWORKS 782308 SP105560*1822 - 2 06/05/21 233.86 .00

Total 60-64-150-591.0 REPAIRS - WATER METERS/MXU'S: 233.86 .00

60-64-200-703.0 WATER LINE IMPR. - LOT STREETS HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC. 62645 TASK 21-13 DOWNTOWN CORE PHASE 07/14/21 235.54 .00

Total 60-64-200-703.0 WATER LINE IMPR. - LOT STREETS: 235.54 .00

60-64-200-704.0 BOOSTER PUMP STATION IMPRV. HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC. 62645 TASK 21-11 FIRE PUMP DESIGN AT THE 07/14/21 2,917.72 .00 HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC. 62645 TASK 21-12 SHORE LODGE PUMP STAT 07/14/21 6,041.50 .00

Total 60-64-200-704.0 BOOSTER PUMP STATION IMPRV.: 8,959.22 .00

60-64-200-720.0 LINE REPLACEMNT - CITY WIDE FALVEY'S LLC 8 PARK STREET AND THOMPSON AVE R 06/18/21 906.00 .00 HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC. 62645 TASK 20-06 JASPER SUBDIVISION WAT 07/14/21 297.50 .00 HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC. 62645 TASK 20-10 Alpine and Wooley Water Mai 07/14/21 351.00 .00 HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC. 62645 TASK 21-03 Hydraulic Model Calibration 07/14/21 972.00 .00 HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC. 62645 TASK 21-08 WASHINGTON/WARD WATE 07/14/21 .00 .00 HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC. 62645 TASK 21-14 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEE 07/14/21 2,179.16 .00 HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC. 62645 TASK 21-15 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEE 07/14/21 2,819.81 .00

Total 60-64-200-720.0 LINE REPLACEMNT - CITY WIDE: 7,525.47 .00

Total WATER DISTRIBUTION: 25,861.19 .00

WATER TREATMENT 60-65-100-160.0 EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WEAVER EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION 06/25/21 15.05 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WEAVER EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION 06/25/21 26.00 .00

Total 60-65-100-160.0 EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION: 41.05 .00

60-65-150-200.0 OFFICE SUPPLIES RICOH AMERICAS CORP. 5062327812-WT RICOH MPC2004EX ADDITIONAL IMAG 07/01/21 17.35 .00

Total 60-65-150-200.0 OFFICE SUPPLIES: 17.35 .00

60-65-150-210.0 DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES MAY HARDWARE INC. 15749 MAT, CLASSIC MAT 06/15/21 108.84 .00 ROCKY MOUNTAIN SIGNS & APPAREL 21244 CITY DOOR LOGOS - WATER DEPT 06/30/21 95.00 .00

Total 60-65-150-210.0 DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES: 203.84 .00

60-65-150-222.0 CHEMICALS C & M LUMBER CO. INC. 455608 CRS SOFTENER SALT 07/08/21 427.77 .00 C & M LUMBER CO. INC. 455673 CRS SOFTENER SALT 07/09/21 427.77 .00 THATCHER COMPANY 1523730 FY21 WATER TREATMENT CHEMICAL 06/28/21 3,033.70 .00 THATCHER COMPANY 1523784 SODA ASH, T-FLOC B-135 06/29/21 3,322.19 .00

Total 60-65-150-222.0 CHEMICALS: 7,211.43 .00 CITY OF McCALL Payment Approval Report - by GL - Portrait Page: 19 Report dates: 7/2/2021-7/15/2021 Jul 15, 2021 02:35PM

Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Invoice Date Net Invoice Amount Amount Paid Date Paid

60-65-150-250.0 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBRICANTS CHEVRON TEXACO 72727280-WT FUEL 07/06/21 220.41 .00

Total 60-65-150-250.0 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBRICANTS: 220.41 .00

60-65-150-260.0 POSTAGE U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-GIESSEN POSTAGE 06/25/21 13.30 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-SIMS POSTAGE 06/25/21 13.69 .00

Total 60-65-150-260.0 POSTAGE: 26.99 .00

60-65-150-302.0 LABORATORY TESTING ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES INC. 81630 TESTING - WATER TREATMENT 05/31/21 235.14 .00 ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES INC. 82457 TESTING - WATER TREATMENT 06/30/21 273.15 .00

Total 60-65-150-302.0 LABORATORY TESTING: 508.29 .00

60-65-150-350.0 ENGINEER SERVICES CLEAR SOLUTIONS ENGINEERING 151 WTP FILTER EVALUATION 07/01/21 3,070.00 .00 HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC. 62645 TASK 21-02 2021 McCall Miscellaneous 07/14/21 695.12 .00

Total 60-65-150-350.0 ENGINEER SERVICES: 3,765.12 .00

60-65-150-400.0 ADVERTISING/LEGAL PUBLICATIONS STAR NEWS, THE 56686 DISPLAY AD - WATERING JULY 8 07/08/21 330.00 .00

Total 60-65-150-400.0 ADVERTISING/LEGAL PUBLICATIONS: 330.00 .00

60-65-150-440.0 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT IDAHO RURAL WATER ASSOCIATION 18643 DUES - SYSTEM 1001-9999 7/1/21-6/30/ 06/29/21 267.50 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-SIMS DWT2-22171 LICENSE 06/25/21 30.00 .00

Total 60-65-150-440.0 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT: 297.50 .00

60-65-150-460.0 TELEPHONE VERIZON WIRELESS 9881038338 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 06/01/21 50.01 .00 VERIZON WIRELESS 9883190918 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 07/01/21 48.67 .00 ZIPLY FIBER 0721-1008 PHONE SERVICE - SCADA/WT - 208-634 07/07/21 62.27 .00 ZIPLY FIBER 0721-1252 PHONE SERVICE - WATER PLANT - 208 07/07/21 328.19 .00

Total 60-65-150-460.0 TELEPHONE: 489.14 .00

60-65-150-490.0 HEAT, LIGHTS, AND UTILITIES MOUNTAIN ALARM 2472128 SECURITY MONITORING #3004958 07/01/21 125.40 .00

Total 60-65-150-490.0 HEAT, LIGHTS, AND UTILITIES: 125.40 .00

60-65-150-570.0 REPAIRS - BUILDING AND GROUNDS CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST 4438-1004439 MEDIUM BOX 06/30/21 43.85 .00

Total 60-65-150-570.0 REPAIRS - BUILDING AND GROUNDS: 43.85 .00

60-65-150-590.0 REPAIRS - OTHER EQUIPMENT A.M.E. ELECTRIC INC. 210927 INSTALL GREEN LIGHT ON PUMP 730, I 06/29/21 771.08 .00 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST 4438-1004703 FAN SPD CONTRL 07/09/21 20.23 .00

Total 60-65-150-590.0 REPAIRS - OTHER EQUIPMENT: 791.31 .00 CITY OF McCALL Payment Approval Report - by GL - Portrait Page: 20 Report dates: 7/2/2021-7/15/2021 Jul 15, 2021 02:35PM

Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Invoice Date Net Invoice Amount Amount Paid Date Paid

60-65-200-706.0 INTAKE BLDG IMPROVEMENTS CLEAR SOLUTIONS ENGINEERING 150 LEGACY INTAKE CE&I 07/01/21 11,702.62 .00 CLOVERDALE NURSERY 292479 SOD 06/10/21 700.00 .00 MAY HARDWARE INC. 16690 LOCK SERVICE CALL, MERCHANDISE 06/23/21 209.00 .00

Total 60-65-200-706.0 INTAKE BLDG IMPROVEMENTS: 12,611.62 .00

Total WATER TREATMENT: 26,683.30 .00

Total WATER FUND: 52,544.49 .00

Grand Totals: 1,399,404.31 124,011.64 CITY OF McCALL Payment Approval Report - by GL - Portrait Page: 1 Report dates: 7/11/2021-7/11/2021 Jul 21, 2021 02:54PM

Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Invoice Date Net Invoice Amount Amount Paid Date Paid

GENERAL FUND

10-14250 PREPAID WORKERS COMP. INS. STATE INSURANCE FUND 25202455 PREMIUM INSTALLMENT - #163590 07/12/21 37,835.00 .00

Total 10-14250 PREPAID WORKERS COMP. INS.: 37,835.00 .00

Total : 37,835.00 .00

MAYOR & COUNCIL 10-41-150-275.0 PUBLIC RELATIONS U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-GREAVES1 TOURS ARE NOW AVAILABLE - GET A G 06/25/21 7.10 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-GREAVES1 PROMOTING MCCALL GOLF CLUB 06/25/21 24.94 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-GREAVES1 AIRPORT OPEN HOUSE 06/25/21 41.21 .00

Total 10-41-150-275.0 PUBLIC RELATIONS: 73.25 .00

Total MAYOR & COUNCIL: 73.25 .00

INFORMATION SYSTEMS 10-42-150-210.0 DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WHEATON IT-DUMP TICKET 06/25/21 28.35 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WHEATON IT-DUMP TICKET 06/25/21 30.00 .00

Total 10-42-150-210.0 DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES: 58.35 .00

10-42-150-300.0 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CASCADE COMMUNICATIONS LLC 322 CONSULTING SERVICES - VOICE, DATA 07/14/21 6,850.00 .00

Total 10-42-150-300.0 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES: 6,850.00 .00

10-42-150-420.0 TRAVEL AND MEETINGS U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-CURTIN AIC CONFERENCE - CURTIN 06/25/21 365.00 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-CURTIN MEAL - AIC MTG 06/25/21 10.32 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-CURTIN MEAL - AIC MTG 06/25/21 33.36 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-CURTIN MOTEL - AIC MTG 06/25/21 539.46 .00

Total 10-42-150-420.0 TRAVEL AND MEETINGS: 948.14 .00

10-42-150-460.0 TELEPHONE T-MOBILE INC 20210704 TESTING T MOBILE 07/04/21 59.22 .00

Total 10-42-150-460.0 TELEPHONE: 59.22 .00

10-42-150-463.0 DIGITAL PHONE SYSTEM U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-JOVANOV HEADSET 06/25/21 149.99 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-JOVANOV DIGITAL PHONE SYSTEM 06/25/21 134.99 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-JOVANOV DIGITAL PHONE SYSTEM 06/25/21 159.98 .00

Total 10-42-150-463.0 DIGITAL PHONE SYSTEM: 444.96 .00

10-42-150-465.0 COMMUNICATIONS - ETHERNET SPARKLIGHT 20210708 INTERNET - ACCT # 112663760 JULY 07/08/21 123.72 .00

Total 10-42-150-465.0 COMMUNICATIONS - ETHERNET: 123.72 .00

10-42-150-610.0 COMPUTER SOFTWARE XERILLION CORPORATION 65136 Global PO# for monthly charges related to 06/30/21 4,463.33 .00 CITY OF McCALL Payment Approval Report - by GL - Portrait Page: 2 Report dates: 7/11/2021-7/11/2021 Jul 21, 2021 02:54PM

Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Invoice Date Net Invoice Amount Amount Paid Date Paid

Total 10-42-150-610.0 COMPUTER SOFTWARE: 4,463.33 .00

Total INFORMATION SYSTEMS: 12,947.72 .00

CITY MANAGER 10-43-150-300.0 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-GREAVES1 SURVEYMONKEY.COM - ANNUAL FEE 06/25/21 384.00 .00

Total 10-43-150-300.0 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES: 384.00 .00

10-43-150-440.0 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-GREAVES1 MEDIA MAILING LIST FOR THE NORTH 06/25/21 32.22 .00

Total 10-43-150-440.0 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT: 32.22 .00

Total CITY MANAGER: 416.22 .00

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 10-48-150-210.0 DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-GREAVES1 BUSINESS CARD - E GREAVES 06/25/21 32.96 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-GROENEVEL LIGHTNING USB CABLE 06/25/21 20.33 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-GROENEVEL LIGHTNING USB CABLE 06/25/21 20.33 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-GROENEVEL MAGSAFE CHARGER 06/25/21 41.73 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-GROENEVEL COLOR DUPLEX DOCUMENT SCANNE 06/25/21 932.79 .00

Total 10-48-150-210.0 DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES: 1,048.14 .00

10-48-150-420.0 TRAVEL AND MEETINGS ALBERTSONS LLC 00729510-051921-3 CED GOING AWAY GATHERING 05/19/21 60.68 .00

Total 10-48-150-420.0 TRAVEL AND MEETINGS: 60.68 .00

Total COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: 1,108.82 .00

POLICE DEPARTMENT 10-50-150-215.0 RANGE/AMMUNITION U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WILLIAMS 9MM MAGPUMP HOPPER FED DBL STA 06/25/21 .05- .00

Total 10-50-150-215.0 RANGE/AMMUNITION: .05- .00

10-50-150-260.0 POSTAGE U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-GIESSEN - 1 POSTAGE 06/25/21 13.30 .00

Total 10-50-150-260.0 POSTAGE: 13.30 .00

10-50-150-580.0 REPAIRS - AUTOMOTIVE EQUIPMENT U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-GIESSEN - 1 CAR WASH 06/25/21 8.00 .00

Total 10-50-150-580.0 REPAIRS - AUTOMOTIVE EQUIPMENT: 8.00 .00

Total POLICE DEPARTMENT: 21.25 .00

Total GENERAL FUND: 52,402.26 .00

LIBRARY FUND CITY OF McCALL Payment Approval Report - by GL - Portrait Page: 3 Report dates: 7/11/2021-7/11/2021 Jul 21, 2021 02:54PM

Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Invoice Date Net Invoice Amount Amount Paid Date Paid

25-21000 SALES TAX PAYABLE STATE TAX COMMISSION 202106 SALES TAX 06/30/21 59.25 .00

Total 25-21000 SALES TAX PAYABLE: 59.25 .00

Total : 59.25 .00

LIBRARY FUND REVENUE 25-30-070-990.0 CASH OVER\(SHORT) STATE TAX COMMISSION 202106 SALES TAX SHORT 06/30/21 .01- .00

Total 25-30-070-990.0 CASH OVER\(SHORT): .01- .00

Total LIBRARY FUND REVENUE: .01- .00

LIBRARY DEPARTMENT 25-57-150-461.0 CABLEONE INTERNET SERVICES SPARKLIGHT 20210708 INTERNET - ACCT # 112663760 JULY 07/08/21 115.71 .00

Total 25-57-150-461.0 CABLEONE INTERNET SERVICES: 115.71 .00

Total LIBRARY DEPARTMENT: 115.71 .00

Total LIBRARY FUND: 174.95 .00

RECREATION FUND

28-21000 SALES TAX PAYABLE STATE TAX COMMISSION 202106 SALES TAX 06/30/21 130.99 .00

Total 28-21000 SALES TAX PAYABLE: 130.99 .00

Total : 130.99 .00

RECREATION FUND REVENUE 28-30-070-990.0 CASH OVER\(SHORT) STATE TAX COMMISSION 202106 SALES TAX OVER 06/30/21 3.50 .00

Total 28-30-070-990.0 CASH OVER\(SHORT): 3.50 .00

Total RECREATION FUND REVENUE: 3.50 .00

RECREATION - PARKS 28-59-150-210.0 DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WHEATON 12 VOLT D 06/25/21 6.25 .00

Total 28-59-150-210.0 DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES: 6.25 .00

28-59-150-250.0 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBRICANTS CHEVRON TEXACO 72728583-PR FUEL 07/06/21 1,385.06 .00

Total 28-59-150-250.0 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBRICANTS: 1,385.06 .00

Total RECREATION - PARKS: 1,391.31 .00

Total RECREATION FUND: 1,525.80 .00 CITY OF McCALL Payment Approval Report - by GL - Portrait Page: 4 Report dates: 7/11/2021-7/11/2021 Jul 21, 2021 02:54PM

Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Invoice Date Net Invoice Amount Amount Paid Date Paid

AIRPORT FUND AIRPORT DEPARTMENT 29-56-150-435.0 BOOKS/PUBLICATIONS/SUBSCRIPTS U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-BISOM FLIGHTAWARE TOOLBOX 06/25/21 95.00 .00

Total 29-56-150-435.0 BOOKS/PUBLICATIONS/SUBSCRIPTS: 95.00 .00

29-56-150-570.0 REPAIRS - BUILDING AND GROUNDS U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-BISOM CABLE PROTECTOR RAMP 06/25/21 74.19 .00

Total 29-56-150-570.0 REPAIRS - BUILDING AND GROUNDS: 74.19 .00

Total AIRPORT DEPARTMENT: 169.19 .00

Total AIRPORT FUND: 169.19 .00

WATER FUND WATER DISTRIBUTION 60-64-150-200.0 OFFICE SUPPLIES U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-SIMS1 2 HARDSHELL CASES, 1 KEYBOARD C 06/25/21 49.97 .00

Total 60-64-150-200.0 OFFICE SUPPLIES: 49.97 .00

60-64-150-210.0 DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-SIMS1 1 HARD CASE 2 KEYBOARD COVER 06/25/21 31.97- .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-SIMS1 1 HARD CASE 06/25/21 17.99- .00

Total 60-64-150-210.0 DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES: 49.96- .00

60-64-150-440.0 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-SIMS1 NMEC EXAM 06/25/21 25.00 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-SIMS1 DWD2-22172 LICENSE 06/25/21 30.00 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-SIMS1 FUEL FOR TESTING 06/25/21 68.04 .00 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-SIMS1 AWWA/DUES 06/25/21 377.00 .00

Total 60-64-150-440.0 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT: 500.04 .00

Total WATER DISTRIBUTION: 500.05 .00

WATER TREATMENT 60-65-150-260.0 POSTAGE U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-SIMS1 POSTAGE 06/25/21 13.69 .00

Total 60-65-150-260.0 POSTAGE: 13.69 .00

60-65-150-440.0 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-SIMS1 DWT2-22171 LICENSE 06/25/21 30.00 .00

Total 60-65-150-440.0 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT: 30.00 .00

Total WATER TREATMENT: 43.69 .00

Total WATER FUND: 543.74 .00

Grand Totals: 54,815.94 .00 CITY OF McCALL Payment Approval Report - by GL - Portrait Page: 5 Report dates: 7/11/2021-7/11/2021 Jul 21, 2021 02:54PM

Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Invoice Date Net Invoice Amount Amount Paid Date Paid BLANK PAGE CITY OF McCALL Payment Approval Report - Vendor Page: 1 Report dates: 7/2/2021-7/15/2021 Jul 15, 2021 02:39PM

Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Invoice Date Net Invoice Amount

A & I DISTRIBUTORS 1037 A & I DISTRIBUTORS 3655433 5 GAL PRO NON-CLR BRK PTS C 07/07/21 179.36

Total A & I DISTRIBUTORS: 179.36

A.M.E. ELECTRIC INC. 1070 A.M.E. ELECTRIC INC. 210927 INSTALL GREEN LIGHT ON PUM 06/29/21 771.08

Total A.M.E. ELECTRIC INC.: 771.08

AFLAC 1680 AFLAC 268423 PREMIUMS - A/C #OLF52 06/25/21 159.04

Total AFLAC: 159.04

ALBERTSONS LLC 1850 ALBERTSONS LLC 00438648-070 SUMMER PROGRAMMING SUPP 07/02/21 24.34 1850 ALBERTSONS LLC 00668465-062 MOUNTAIN BIKE CLASS 06/28/21 55.90 1850 ALBERTSONS LLC 00729510-051 DEPT. SNACKS - PARKS 05/19/21 60.68 1850 ALBERTSONS LLC 00806815-070 COORDINATER BEVERAGES - PI 07/06/21 3.99

Total ALBERTSONS LLC: 144.91

ALSCO 2300 ALSCO LBOI1907514 LAUNDRY 07/06/21 39.67 2300 ALSCO LBOI1909301 LAUNDRY 07/13/21 39.67 2300 ALSCO LBOI1909307 FLOOR MATS 07/13/21 76.36

Total ALSCO: 155.70

ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES INC. 2790 ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES IN 81630 TESTING - WATER TREATMENT 05/31/21 235.14 2790 ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES IN 82457 TESTING - WATER TREATMENT 06/30/21 273.15

Total ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES INC.: 508.29

ASSOCIATION OF IDAHO CITIES 3360 ASSOCIATION OF IDAHO CITIE 10703 AIC DUES FY 2022 07/08/21 1,502.00 3360 ASSOCIATION OF IDAHO CITIE 10888 2021 ICCTFOA MEMBERSHIP DU 07/08/21 135.00 3360 ASSOCIATION OF IDAHO CITIE 10888 2021 ICCTFOA MEMBERSHIP DU 07/08/21 90.00

Total ASSOCIATION OF IDAHO CITIES: 1,727.00

BAKER & TAYLOR BOOKS 3700 BAKER & TAYLOR BOOKS 0003241599 CHILDREN'S BOOKS 07/08/21 20.62- 3700 BAKER & TAYLOR BOOKS 2036062428 BOOKS 06/30/21 99.51 3700 BAKER & TAYLOR BOOKS 2036081014 BOOKS 07/12/21 16.09

Total BAKER & TAYLOR BOOKS: 94.98

BLUE RIBBON LINEN SUPPLY INC. 4745 BLUE RIBBON LINEN SUPPLY I 273988 FLOOR MATS 07/02/21 25.00 CITY OF McCALL Payment Approval Report - Vendor Page: 2 Report dates: 7/2/2021-7/15/2021 Jul 15, 2021 02:39PM

Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Invoice Date Net Invoice Amount

Total BLUE RIBBON LINEN SUPPLY INC.: 25.00

BOISE OFFICE EQUIPMENT 4870 BOISE OFFICE EQUIPMENT IN2639059 XEROX XALC8045'S OVERAGE C 07/12/21 32.48 4870 BOISE OFFICE EQUIPMENT IN2639059 XEROX XALC8045'S OVERAGE C 07/12/21 53.63 4870 BOISE OFFICE EQUIPMENT IN2639059 XEROX XALC8070H2 OVERAGE 07/12/21 113.71

Total BOISE OFFICE EQUIPMENT: 199.82

BUILDERS FIRSTSOURCE INC. 5763 BUILDERS FIRSTSOURCE INC. 83673187 2X2-8 FURRING STRIP 06/30/21 45.87 5763 BUILDERS FIRSTSOURCE INC. 83683826 4X4-10' #2 HF TRTD GC ICT 07/01/21 80.74

Total BUILDERS FIRSTSOURCE INC.: 126.61

C & B OPERATIONS LLC 5923 C & B OPERATIONS LLC 11249055 EQUIPMENT PARTS 07/01/21 265.39

Total C & B OPERATIONS LLC: 265.39

C & M LUMBER CO. INC. 5980 C & M LUMBER CO. INC. 20210625 LATE CHG POLICE DEPT 06/25/21 10.75 5980 C & M LUMBER CO. INC. 20210625 LATE CHG GOLF DEPT 06/25/21 10.75 5980 C & M LUMBER CO. INC. 20210625 LATE CHG PARKS DEPT 06/25/21 10.74 5980 C & M LUMBER CO. INC. 20210625 LATE CHG STREETS DEPT 06/25/21 10.75 5980 C & M LUMBER CO. INC. 455608 CRS SOFTENER SALT 07/08/21 427.77 5980 C & M LUMBER CO. INC. 455673 CRS SOFTENER SALT 07/09/21 427.77 5980 C & M LUMBER CO. INC. 455723 BALLFIELDS/SOCCERFIELDS 07/09/21 187.35

Total C & M LUMBER CO. INC.: 1,085.88

CAREY, ELLA 99997 CAREY, ELLA 20210701 MT BIKE SEASON 1 07/01/21 96.00

Total CAREY, ELLA: 96.00

CHEVRON TEXACO 6760 CHEVRON TEXACO 72727227-CD FUEL 07/06/21 155.83 6760 CHEVRON TEXACO 72727280-WT FUEL 07/06/21 854.02 6760 CHEVRON TEXACO 72727280-WT FUEL 07/06/21 220.41 6760 CHEVRON TEXACO 72728957-PD FUEL 07/06/21 4,267.13 6760 CHEVRON TEXACO 72728958-PW FUEL 07/06/21 2,660.82

Total CHEVRON TEXACO: 8,158.21

CLEAR SOLUTIONS ENGINEERING 7076 CLEAR SOLUTIONS ENGINEERI 150 LEGACY INTAKE CE&I 07/01/21 11,702.62 7076 CLEAR SOLUTIONS ENGINEERI 151 WTP FILTER EVALUATION 07/01/21 3,070.00

Total CLEAR SOLUTIONS ENGINEERING: 14,772.62

CLOVERDALE NURSERY 7180 CLOVERDALE NURSERY 292479 SOD 06/10/21 700.00 CITY OF McCALL Payment Approval Report - Vendor Page: 3 Report dates: 7/2/2021-7/15/2021 Jul 15, 2021 02:39PM

Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Invoice Date Net Invoice Amount

Total CLOVERDALE NURSERY: 700.00

COASTLINE EQUIPMENT CO. 7290 COASTLINE EQUIPMENT CO. 817412 FILTER ELE 07/12/21 93.07

Total COASTLINE EQUIPMENT CO.: 93.07

COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENT 7460 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENT 3289725-0701 PREMIUMS - BCN E3289725 06/21/21 525.70

Total COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENT: 525.70

CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST 7720 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL D 4438-1004439 MEDIUM BOX 06/30/21 43.85 7720 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL D 4438-1004703 FAN SPD CONTRL 07/09/21 20.23

Total CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST: 64.08

CURTIS CLEAN SWEEP INC. 8370 CURTIS CLEAN SWEEP INC. 163901 4" PAINTED LINES (LNFT) 06/30/21 16,404.66 8370 CURTIS CLEAN SWEEP INC. 163901 PAINTED SHARED LANE MARKIN 06/30/21 1,867.24 8370 CURTIS CLEAN SWEEP INC. 163901 PAINTED CROSSWALK MARKING 06/30/21 3,825.00 8370 CURTIS CLEAN SWEEP INC. 163901 PAINTED STOP BARS 06/30/21 480.00 8370 CURTIS CLEAN SWEEP INC. 163901 MOBILIZATION 06/30/21 4,000.00 8370 CURTIS CLEAN SWEEP INC. 163901 PAINTED TURN ARROWS 06/30/21 746.34 8370 CURTIS CLEAN SWEEP INC. 163939 Repainting Runway Markings using 06/30/21 12,827.03

Total CURTIS CLEAN SWEEP INC.: 40,150.27

D & B SUPPLY CO. 8440 D & B SUPPLY CO. 61875 BROMACIL, GLYPHOSATE PLUS, 07/07/21 317.94

Total D & B SUPPLY CO.: 317.94

DANNY'S WELDING INC. 8540 DANNY'S WELDING INC. 21-802 18.3x2"x1/4 FLAT BAR 07/11/21 57.55

Total DANNY'S WELDING INC.: 57.55

DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF IDAHO 8860 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF IDAHO 202107 PREMIUMS - #2667-0000 06/22/21 3,260.67

Total DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF IDAHO: 3,260.67

DLT SOLUTIONS LLC 9230 DLT SOLUTIONS LLC SI511431 AUTOCAD CIVIL 3D ANNUAL REN 02/26/21 2,703.46 9230 DLT SOLUTIONS LLC SI511431 AUTOCAD CIVIL 3D ANNUAL REN 02/26/21 205.80 9230 DLT SOLUTIONS LLC SI511431 AUTOCAD CIVIL 3D ANNUAL REN 02/26/21 205.80

Total DLT SOLUTIONS LLC: 3,115.06

DROULARD LAND SURVEYING 9480 DROULARD LAND SURVEYING 4480 BROWN PARK FIELD GPS SURV 07/01/21 260.00 CITY OF McCALL Payment Approval Report - Vendor Page: 4 Report dates: 7/2/2021-7/15/2021 Jul 15, 2021 02:39PM

Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Invoice Date Net Invoice Amount

Total DROULARD LAND SURVEYING: 260.00

ELAM & BURKE, P.A. 9880 ELAM & BURKE, P.A. 191429 GENERAL 06/30/21 3,080.50

Total ELAM & BURKE, P.A.: 3,080.50

ERS EMERGENCY RESPONDER SERVICES INC 10000 ERS EMERGENCY RESPONDE 21-233 ID MISC PARTS & MATERIALS 06/29/21 215.00

Total ERS EMERGENCY RESPONDER SERVICES INC: 215.00

EVO STUDIOS INC. 10250 EVO STUDIOS INC. 0014042 ANNUAL WEB MAINTENANCE 07/13/21 1,500.00

Total EVO STUDIOS INC.: 1,500.00

FALVEY'S LLC 10495 FALVEY'S LLC 1 E LAKE ST WATERFRONT & BRO 07/13/21 103,712.45 10495 FALVEY'S LLC 8 PARK STREET AND THOMPSON 06/18/21 676.55 10495 FALVEY'S LLC 8 PARK STREET AND THOMPSON 06/18/21 3,827.95 10495 FALVEY'S LLC 8 PARK STREET AND THOMPSON 06/18/21 906.00

Total FALVEY'S LLC: 109,122.95

FERGUSON WATERWORKS 10750 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 779594 SGL SSSTRP SDL 04/30/21 316.68 10750 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 782308 SP105560*1822 - 2 06/05/21 233.86 10750 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 786395-1 16 SLIP VLV BX TOP SECT 07/01/21 332.01 10750 FERGUSON WATERWORKS SC32628 JUNE 06/30/21 4.75

Total FERGUSON WATERWORKS: 887.30

FLORANCE JOHNET BEAVER 14326 FLORANCE JOHNET BEAVER 20210629 MCCALL CITY LIBRARY MATCHIN 06/29/21 30.00

Total FLORANCE JOHNET BEAVER: 30.00

FORSGREN ASSOCIATES INC 11229 FORSGREN ASSOCIATES INC 221194 02-19-0176 MISSION ST, SOUTH 05/25/21 4,227.95 11229 FORSGREN ASSOCIATES INC 221194 02-19-0176 MISSION ST, SOUTH 05/25/21 334.91

Total FORSGREN ASSOCIATES INC: 4,562.86

FRANZ WITTE - McCALL LLC 11312 FRANZ WITTE - McCALL LLC 220000025628 INSECT/DIS/MITE 07/12/21 7.35

Total FRANZ WITTE - McCALL LLC: 7.35

GALE/CENGAGE LEARNING INC 11625 GALE/CENGAGE LEARNING IN 74574730 BOOK 06/25/21 27.19 CITY OF McCALL Payment Approval Report - Vendor Page: 5 Report dates: 7/2/2021-7/15/2021 Jul 15, 2021 02:39PM

Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Invoice Date Net Invoice Amount

Total GALE/CENGAGE LEARNING INC: 27.19

GALLS 11640 GALLS 18755764 ALTERATIONS 07/07/21 78.00 11640 GALLS 18774625 2 Jumpsuits for Officer Pape. z 07/09/21 1,193.40 11640 GALLS 18774626 2 Jumpsuits for Officer Jerry Tatum. 07/09/21 1,121.40

Total GALLS: 2,392.80

GEM STATE PAPER & SUPPLY 11940 GEM STATE PAPER & SUPPLY 3041036 45 GALLON BAGS 06/30/21 316.80

Total GEM STATE PAPER & SUPPLY: 316.80

GRAINGER 32180 GRAINGER 9948940300 HANDTRUCK, BATTERY BOX 06/29/21 91.73

Total GRAINGER: 91.73

GRANITE EXCAVATION INC. 12385 GRANITE EXCAVATION INC. 1 MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT 07/06/21 905,395.22 12385 GRANITE EXCAVATION INC. 14677 MATHER/BURNS ASPHALT REPAI 06/30/21 3,104.37

Total GRANITE EXCAVATION INC.: 908,499.59

HIETALA PHOTOGRAPHY 13695 HIETALA PHOTOGRAPHY 20210604 TEAM PHOTOS - YOUTH SPORT 06/04/21 380.00

Total HIETALA PHOTOGRAPHY: 380.00

HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC. 14123 HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC. 62645 PH 17-03 C 2ND STREET AND LE 07/14/21 299.73 14123 HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC. 62645 PH 17-03 C 2ND STREET AND LE 07/14/21 4,695.79 14123 HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC. 62645 PH 19-06A PHASE 2B SURFACE I 07/14/21 267.03 14123 HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC. 62645 PH 19-06A PHASE 2B SURFACE I 07/14/21 1,068.13 14123 HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC. 62645 TASK 20-06 JASPER SUBDIVISIO 07/14/21 297.50 14123 HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC. 62645 TASK 20-09 BROWN PARK SLOP 07/14/21 104.80 14123 HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC. 62645 TASK 20-10 Alpine and Wooley Wa 07/14/21 351.00 14123 HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC. 62645 TASK 21-01A FY2021 SPRING M 07/14/21 7,168.51 14123 HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC. 62645 TASK 21-02 2021 McCall Miscellan 07/14/21 695.13 14123 HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC. 62645 TASK 21-02 2021 McCall Miscellan 07/14/21 695.12 14123 HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC. 62645 TASK 21-03 Hydraulic Model Calibr 07/14/21 972.00 14123 HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC. 62645 TASK 21-05 BROWN PARK IMPR 07/14/21 1,688.53 14123 HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC. 62645 TASK 21-08 WASHINGTON/WARD 07/14/21 .00 14123 HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC. 62645 TASK 21-11 FIRE PUMP DESIGN 07/14/21 2,917.72 14123 HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC. 62645 TASK 21-12 SHORE LODGE PUM 07/14/21 6,041.50 14123 HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC. 62645 TASK 21-13 DOWNTOWN CORE 07/14/21 437.44 14123 HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC. 62645 TASK 21-13 DOWNTOWN CORE 07/14/21 235.54 14123 HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC. 62645 TASK 21-14 CONSTRUCTION EN 07/14/21 2,179.16 14123 HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC. 62645 TASK 21-15 CONSTRUCTION EN 07/14/21 2,819.81 14123 HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC. 62645 TASK 21-17 SURVEY SERVICES 07/14/21 1,399.55 14123 HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC. 62645 TASK 21-17 SURVEY SERVICES 07/14/21 1,324.79 14123 HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC. 62645 TASK 21-17 SURVEY SERVICES 07/14/21 1,623.88 CITY OF McCALL Payment Approval Report - Vendor Page: 6 Report dates: 7/2/2021-7/15/2021 Jul 15, 2021 02:39PM

Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Invoice Date Net Invoice Amount

14123 HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC. 62645 TASK 21-17 SURVEY SERVICES 07/14/21 1,474.34

Total HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC.: 38,757.00

IDAHO CHILD SUPPORT RECEIPTING 14860 IDAHO CHILD SUPPORT RECEI 20210716-2 CHILD SUPPORT - #195240 07/16/21 69.22

Total IDAHO CHILD SUPPORT RECEIPTING: 69.22

IDAHO RURAL WATER ASSOCIATION 15460 IDAHO RURAL WATER ASSOCIA 18643 DUES - SYSTEM 1001-9999 7/1/2 06/29/21 267.50 15460 IDAHO RURAL WATER ASSOCIA 18643 DUES - SYSTEM 1001-9999 7/1/2 06/29/21 267.50

Total IDAHO RURAL WATER ASSOCIATION: 535.00

III-A TRUST 15735 III-A TRUST 202107 PREMIUMS - #142-MCCALL 07/08/21 94,025.00 15735 III-A TRUST 202107 VISION PREMIUMS - #142-MCCA 07/08/21 1,053.00

Total III-A TRUST: 95,078.00

JERRY'S AUTO PARTS 16890 JERRY'S AUTO PARTS 210052 HYDRAULIC FILTER 03/25/21 9.68 16890 JERRY'S AUTO PARTS 221138 FLYWHEEL 06/01/21 93.40 16890 JERRY'S AUTO PARTS 223842 O-RING 06/15/21 .92 16890 JERRY'S AUTO PARTS 226611 FUEL SENDERS 06/29/21 25.62 16890 JERRY'S AUTO PARTS 226641 GAUGE 06/29/21 34.67 16890 JERRY'S AUTO PARTS 226922 CABLE TIE, TAPE 06/30/21 17.43 16890 JERRY'S AUTO PARTS 227284 OIL & FUEL FILTER, HYDRAULIC 07/02/21 146.95 16890 JERRY'S AUTO PARTS 227290 FUEL FILTER 07/02/21 7.36 16890 JERRY'S AUTO PARTS 227293 AIR FILTER 07/02/21 82.60 16890 JERRY'S AUTO PARTS 227295 CABIN AIR FILTER 07/02/21 30.26 16890 JERRY'S AUTO PARTS 227848 OIL FILTER 07/06/21 21.95 16890 JERRY'S AUTO PARTS 227901 CABIN AIR FILTER 07/06/21 13.42 16890 JERRY'S AUTO PARTS 227914 PREM TRACTOR FL 07/06/21 357.55 16890 JERRY'S AUTO PARTS 227970 TRAILER BALL, PIN CLIP 07/06/21 21.43 16890 JERRY'S AUTO PARTS 228202 MOTOR TUNE-UP, FUEL FILTER, 07/07/21 35.72 16890 JERRY'S AUTO PARTS 228414 WHITE LITHIUM GREASE 07/08/21 19.14 16890 JERRY'S AUTO PARTS 228644 BATTERY ACCESSORIES 07/09/21 10.75 16890 JERRY'S AUTO PARTS 228753 OIL FILTERS 07/09/21 42.68 16890 JERRY'S AUTO PARTS 228756 9 PC INSERT BIT SET 07/09/21 9.49 16890 JERRY'S AUTO PARTS 228780 FUEL FILTER 07/09/21 116.16 16890 JERRY'S AUTO PARTS 229370 SPEC ADH RMVR 07/13/21 20.06 16890 JERRY'S AUTO PARTS 229423 OIL FILTER 07/13/21 5.05

Total JERRY'S AUTO PARTS: 1,122.29

KNOWLES, HANK 17713 KNOWLES, HANK 159351 DBLE PAYMENT FOR APRIL MET 07/13/21 48.41

Total KNOWLES, HANK: 48.41

LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 18440 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 9308587633 BENT PULL HITCH PIN STEEL 07/02/21 13.56 CITY OF McCALL Payment Approval Report - Vendor Page: 7 Report dates: 7/2/2021-7/15/2021 Jul 15, 2021 02:39PM

Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Invoice Date Net Invoice Amount

Total LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.: 13.56

MAROSTICA, KURT 19872 MAROSTICA, KURT 439578 Lot Distribution - Housing Unit 6 07/15/21 10,000.00 19872 MAROSTICA, KURT 439632 Lot Distribution - Housing Unit 5 07/15/21 10,000.00

Total MAROSTICA, KURT: 20,000.00

MAY HARDWARE INC. 20160 MAY HARDWARE INC. 12636 BIG ORANGE WEDGE 05/18/21 11.98 20160 MAY HARDWARE INC. 14955 COUNTERSINK, MISC FASTENE 06/08/21 15.28 20160 MAY HARDWARE INC. 15401 HOSE ADAPTER, FLR CONCTR, 06/11/21 12.21 20160 MAY HARDWARE INC. 15749 MAT, CLASSIC MAT 06/15/21 108.84 20160 MAY HARDWARE INC. 15884 D BATTERY 06/16/21 18.99 20160 MAY HARDWARE INC. 16144 HOG RINGS 06/18/21 27.68 20160 MAY HARDWARE INC. 16158 MISC FASTENERS 06/18/21 4.50 20160 MAY HARDWARE INC. 16263 ARMER ALL 06/19/21 8.99 20160 MAY HARDWARE INC. 16329 STEP STOOL 06/20/21 58.49 20160 MAY HARDWARE INC. 16340 POWER CORD, LIGHTED CONNE 06/20/21 43.17 20160 MAY HARDWARE INC. 16442 PARACORD 06/21/21 15.29 20160 MAY HARDWARE INC. 16690 LOCK SERVICE CALL, MERCHAN 06/23/21 209.00 20160 MAY HARDWARE INC. 16969 ELBOW, BUSHING, TEE, FEMALE 06/25/21 16.10 20160 MAY HARDWARE INC. 17461 COFFEE MAKER, FILTERS 06/30/21 43.18 20160 MAY HARDWARE INC. 17481 COFFEE FILTERS 06/30/21 4.05 20160 MAY HARDWARE INC. 17521 MARK PAINT 06/30/21 17.79 20160 MAY HARDWARE INC. 17565 DEEP WOODS 07/01/21 43.13 20160 MAY HARDWARE INC. 17565 IRRIGATION PARTS 07/01/21 88.91 20160 MAY HARDWARE INC. 17570 MISC FASTENERS 07/01/21 1.08 20160 MAY HARDWARE INC. 17578 IRRIGATION PARTS 07/01/21 37.58 20160 MAY HARDWARE INC. 17695 COUPLER, LID VALVE BOX 07/02/21 18.88 20160 MAY HARDWARE INC. 17708 IRRIGATION PARTS 07/02/21 50.74 20160 MAY HARDWARE INC. 18005 WORK GLOVES 07/06/21 8.63 20160 MAY HARDWARE INC. 18049 TEE, INSERT COUPLING, ADAPT 07/06/21 8.21 20160 MAY HARDWARE INC. 18123 CLEAR COATED CABLE, WIRE R 07/07/21 10.70 20160 MAY HARDWARE INC. 18154 IRRIGATION PARTS 07/07/21 46.80 20160 MAY HARDWARE INC. 18194 ELBOW, BARB 07/07/21 5.00 20160 MAY HARDWARE INC. 18264 HOUSING O RING 07/08/21 7.18 20160 MAY HARDWARE INC. 18277 HOSE END MALE, GARDEN HOS 07/08/21 39.58 20160 MAY HARDWARE INC. 18292 PAINT 07/08/21 17.96 20160 MAY HARDWARE INC. 18298 SPUN POLY FILTER 07/08/21 8.99 20160 MAY HARDWARE INC. 18321 TARPCOVER, HNDSOAP 07/08/21 13.93 20160 MAY HARDWARE INC. 18377 TUNE UP, MISC SHOP SUPPLIES, 07/09/21 459.94 20160 MAY HARDWARE INC. 18393 HOSE MENDER, HEX BUSHING, 07/09/21 53.23 20160 MAY HARDWARE INC. 18622 TRASH CAN, SPRY PNT, KEY 07/12/21 218.81 20160 MAY HARDWARE INC. 18655 PINE-SOL CLEANER, PET CARPE 07/12/21 13.64 20160 MAY HARDWARE INC. 18687 CABLE TIES 07/12/21 8.98 20160 MAY HARDWARE INC. 18806 THREADED STEEL ROD, WASP & 07/13/21 7.19 20160 MAY HARDWARE INC. 18810 THREADED STEEL ROD 07/13/21 9.44 20160 MAY HARDWARE INC. 18839 EMT COMP BOX CONNECTOR 07/14/21 1.34 20160 MAY HARDWARE INC. 18843 DUCT TAPE 07/14/21 16.17

Total MAY HARDWARE INC.: 1,811.58 CITY OF McCALL Payment Approval Report - Vendor Page: 8 Report dates: 7/2/2021-7/15/2021 Jul 15, 2021 02:39PM

Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Invoice Date Net Invoice Amount

McCALL MUSIC SOCIETY INC 20615 McCALL MUSIC SOCIETY INC 21-02 SUMMER MUSIC FESTIVAL 2021 07/13/21 3,000.00

Total McCALL MUSIC SOCIETY INC: 3,000.00

MCCALL, CITY OF 6960 MCCALL, CITY OF 0721-152751 WATER 07/13/21 29.25

Total MCCALL, CITY OF: 29.25

MOUNTAIN ALARM 10900 MOUNTAIN ALARM 2472128 SECURITY MONITORING #30049 07/01/21 125.40

Total MOUNTAIN ALARM: 125.40

NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS 22580 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS C440721 PREMIUMS - C44000000000 06/10/21 16.00

Total NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS: 16.00

NUESYNERGY INC. 23265 NUESYNERGY INC. 2021-06 HRA/FSA ADMIN FEES 07/08/21 400.00 23265 NUESYNERGY INC. 2021-06 COBRA ADMIN FEES 07/08/21 75.00

Total NUESYNERGY INC.: 475.00

OCLC INC. 23320 OCLC INC. 1000136670 CATALOGING/METADATA GROUP 07/01/21 1,500.00

Total OCLC INC.: 1,500.00

OHIO NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE 23400 OHIO NATIONAL LIFE INSURAN 87822265 PREMIUMS - SS0004892 07/01/21 21.47

Total OHIO NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE: 21.47

OREGON DEPT. OF JUSTICE 23603 OREGON DEPT. OF JUSTICE 20210716-5 CASE ID - 410000000121812 07/16/21 252.00

Total OREGON DEPT. OF JUSTICE: 252.00

OVERDRIVE INC. 23635 OVERDRIVE INC. 4258CO21288 EBOOKS 07/09/21 62.50

Total OVERDRIVE INC.: 62.50

PACIFIC GOLF & TURF LLC 23791 PACIFIC GOLF & TURF LLC 01-121581 RNB-950 INTERNAL 22 RAINBIRD 07/02/21 868.80

Total PACIFIC GOLF & TURF LLC: 868.80

PAYETTE LAKES SKI CLUB 24130 PAYETTE LAKES SKI CLUB 21-13 LOT DISB. - PHASE 2 SKI LIFT AN 07/13/21 25,000.00 CITY OF McCALL Payment Approval Report - Vendor Page: 9 Report dates: 7/2/2021-7/15/2021 Jul 15, 2021 02:39PM

Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Invoice Date Net Invoice Amount

Total PAYETTE LAKES SKI CLUB: 25,000.00

PAYETTE LAND TRUST INC 24142 PAYETTE LAND TRUST INC 21-16 LOT DISB. - PAYETTE RIVER BAS 07/13/21 5,000.00

Total PAYETTE LAND TRUST INC: 5,000.00

PITNEY BOWES 24460 PITNEY BOWES 1018475591 TAPE STRIPS 07/01/21 56.52

Total PITNEY BOWES: 56.52

POLLARDWATER.COM 24575 POLLARDWATER.COM 195227 2-1/2 MNST X FNST CB HYD GAT 07/13/21 389.14

Total POLLARDWATER.COM: 389.14

POST ACADEMY, IDAHO 24680 POST ACADEMY, IDAHO S22003817 URBAN RIFLE USERS COURSE - 07/12/21 120.00

Total POST ACADEMY, IDAHO: 120.00

PUBLIC AGENCY TRAINING COUNCIL 25135 PUBLIC AGENCY TRAINING CO 256707 OFFICER INVOLVED SHOOTING- 06/30/21 750.00

Total PUBLIC AGENCY TRAINING COUNCIL: 750.00

PUMPTECH INC 25265 PUMPTECH INC 0167709-IN JOHN CRANE SEAL 03/31/21 447.90

Total PUMPTECH INC: 447.90

RICOH AMERICAS CORP. 25770 RICOH AMERICAS CORP. 5062327812-W RICOH MPC2004EX ADDITIONAL 07/01/21 17.35

Total RICOH AMERICAS CORP.: 17.35

RIDLEY'S FAMILY MARKETS 25800 RIDLEY'S FAMILY MARKETS 0000131025 WORK PANTS - PHILLIP GEORG 07/10/21 193.39 25800 RIDLEY'S FAMILY MARKETS 1001260109 PROGRAM - ICE 07/12/21 6.86 25800 RIDLEY'S FAMILY MARKETS 6000531209 PROGRAM - ICE 07/05/21 2.19

Total RIDLEY'S FAMILY MARKETS: 202.44

ROADWISE INC. 26055 ROADWISE INC. 21-3578 DUST ABATEMENT 07/12/21 5,851.28 26055 ROADWISE INC. 21-3579 DUST ABATEMENT 07/12/21 5,859.83

Total ROADWISE INC.: 11,711.11

ROCKY MOUNTAIN SIGNS & APPAREL 26280 ROCKY MOUNTAIN SIGNS & AP 21234 H-STANDS - 6 06/30/21 11.10 26280 ROCKY MOUNTAIN SIGNS & AP 21244 CITY DOOR LOGOS - WATER DE 06/30/21 95.00 CITY OF McCALL Payment Approval Report - Vendor Page: 10 Report dates: 7/2/2021-7/15/2021 Jul 15, 2021 02:39PM

Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Invoice Date Net Invoice Amount

26280 ROCKY MOUNTAIN SIGNS & AP 21263 COREX SIGN 07/08/21 27.50 26280 ROCKY MOUNTAIN SIGNS & AP 21282 DECALS - ASPEN MARKET BUS 06/30/21 539.00 26280 ROCKY MOUNTAIN SIGNS & AP 21303 FLAG DECALS 07/10/21 172.50

Total ROCKY MOUNTAIN SIGNS & APPAREL: 845.10

SEVEN DEVILS PLAY FOUNDRY 27473 SEVEN DEVILS PLAY FOUNDRY 21-01 LOT DISB. - MARKETING AND PR 07/13/21 2,000.00

Total SEVEN DEVILS PLAY FOUNDRY: 2,000.00

SHADOW TRACKERS 27504 SHADOW TRACKERS RDK210437 BACKGROUND CHECKS 06/30/21 90.00 27504 SHADOW TRACKERS RDK210437 BACKGROUND CHECKS 06/30/21 30.00 27504 SHADOW TRACKERS RDK210437 BACKGROUND CHECKS 06/30/21 30.00 27504 SHADOW TRACKERS RDK210437 BACKGROUND CHECKS 06/30/21 30.00

Total SHADOW TRACKERS: 180.00

SHELL FLEET PLUS 29961 SHELL FLEET PLUS 72747150-PD FUEL 07/06/21 55.08

Total SHELL FLEET PLUS: 55.08

SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO., THE 27655 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO., THE 2833-3 GLSBEAD IDAC110 50#B 07/08/21 59.48

Total SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO., THE: 59.48

SHRED-IT USA - BOISE 27890 SHRED-IT USA - BOISE 8182374434 REGULAR SERVICE 07/07/21 163.48 27890 SHRED-IT USA - BOISE 8182374434 REGULAR SERVICE 07/07/21 457.60

Total SHRED-IT USA - BOISE: 621.08

SILVER CREEK SUPPLY LLC 27965 SILVER CREEK SUPPLY LLC 4760709-001 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 06/25/21 788.66 27965 SILVER CREEK SUPPLY LLC 4776787-001 FLOW CONTROL COMPRESSION 06/30/21 92.74

Total SILVER CREEK SUPPLY LLC: 881.40

SINCLAIR OIL CORP 28110 SINCLAIR OIL CORP 72589976-PR FUEL 06/30/21 196.76

Total SINCLAIR OIL CORP: 196.76

SPANGENBERG, NOAH 99986 SPANGENBERG, NOAH 20210701 MOUNTAIN BIKE INSTRUCTOR 07/01/21 72.00

Total SPANGENBERG, NOAH: 72.00

SPANGENBERG, ZOE 10000 SPANGENBERG, ZOE 20210701 MOUNTAIN BIKE INSTRUCTOR - 07/01/21 96.00 CITY OF McCALL Payment Approval Report - Vendor Page: 11 Report dates: 7/2/2021-7/15/2021 Jul 15, 2021 02:39PM

Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Invoice Date Net Invoice Amount

Total SPANGENBERG, ZOE: 96.00

SPECIALTY PLASTICS & FAB. INC. 28670 SPECIALTY PLASTICS & FAB. IN 81205-1 SHIPPING 05/25/21 24.99

Total SPECIALTY PLASTICS & FAB. INC.: 24.99

STAR NEWS, THE 28980 STAR NEWS, THE 56591 LEGAL AD - P & Z HEARING JULY 06/17/21 175.56 28980 STAR NEWS, THE 56684 DISPLAY AD - MCCALL COUNCIL 07/08/21 264.00 28980 STAR NEWS, THE 56685 Noxious Weed Ads will run during P 07/08/21 480.00 28980 STAR NEWS, THE 56686 DISPLAY AD - WATERING JULY 8 07/08/21 330.00 28980 STAR NEWS, THE 56697 DISPLAY AD - HELP WANTED - P 07/08/21 198.00 28980 STAR NEWS, THE 56721 DISPLAY AD - LAKESIDE LIBERT 07/01/21 660.00

Total STAR NEWS, THE: 2,107.56

TETON COMMUNICATION INC 29905 TETON COMMUNICATION INC 18664 SHIPPING 06/28/21 25.00 29905 TETON COMMUNICATION INC 18812 VHF SMA ANTENNA 07/09/21 66.00

Total TETON COMMUNICATION INC: 91.00

THATCHER COMPANY 29996 THATCHER COMPANY 1523730 FY21 WATER TREATMENT CHEM 06/28/21 3,033.70 29996 THATCHER COMPANY 1523784 SODA ASH, T-FLOC B-135 06/29/21 3,322.19

Total THATCHER COMPANY: 6,355.89

TOM MECKEL SAND & GRAVEL INC. 30300 TOM MECKEL SAND & GRAVEL 2021-2812 1 YARD DRAIN ROCK 06/30/21 36.00

Total TOM MECKEL SAND & GRAVEL INC.: 36.00

TREASURE VALLEY COFFEE INC. 30580 TREASURE VALLEY COFFEE IN 2160:07602692 TEA, COCOA, CREAMER, SUGAR 07/12/21 35.93 30580 TREASURE VALLEY COFFEE IN 2160:07650453 COFFEE 07/13/21 143.65

Total TREASURE VALLEY COFFEE INC.: 179.58

TURF EQUIPMENT & IRRIGATION 30880 TURF EQUIPMENT & IRRIGATIO 456428-00 OIL FILTER, AIR CLEANER, AIR FI 06/29/21 191.87 30880 TURF EQUIPMENT & IRRIGATIO 760891-00 LIFT ARM, HYD CYLINDER, 07/12/21 .00

Total TURF EQUIPMENT & IRRIGATION: 191.87

U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621 - MALVIC VARIOUS ROAD PAINTING STEN 06/25/21 1,255.00 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621 - MALVIC ITD HQ VEHICLE REGISTRATION 06/25/21 23.69 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-ARRASM EAR PROTECTION FOR SWAT T 06/25/21 181.23 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-ARRASM SUPERVISORY COURSE - ARRA 06/25/21 27.17 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-ARRASM SUPERVISORY COURSE - ARRA 06/25/21 29.42 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-ARRASM SUPERVISORY COURSE - ARRA 06/25/21 39.43 CITY OF McCALL Payment Approval Report - Vendor Page: 12 Report dates: 7/2/2021-7/15/2021 Jul 15, 2021 02:39PM

Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Invoice Date Net Invoice Amount

31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-ARRASM SUPERVISORY COURSE - ARRA 06/25/21 129.61 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-ARRASM SWAT INTERMEDIATE - ARRASMI 06/25/21 40.42 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-GIESSEN CAR WASH 06/25/21 8.00 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-GIESSEN POSTAGE 06/25/21 13.30 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-GREAVE MONDOCODE LLC 06/25/21 32.22 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-GREAVE SURVEYMONKEY.COM - ANNUAL 06/25/21 384.00 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-GREAVE BUSINESS CARD - E GREAVES 06/25/21 32.96 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-GREAVE TOURS ARE NOW AVAILABLE - G 06/25/21 7.10 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-GREAVE PROMOTING MCCALL GOLF CLU 06/25/21 24.94 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-GREAVE EVENT: AIRPORT OPEN HOUSE 06/25/21 41.21 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-JOHNSO CLS AND SEARCH WARRANTS 06/25/21 9.99 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-JOHNSO CAR WASH 06/25/21 8.00 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-KIMMEL CAR WASH 06/25/21 8.00 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-KOLANO DIPLOMA COVER 06/25/21 33.98 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-KOLANO FLESH LEFT EARMOLD, CLEAR 06/25/21 93.95 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-KOLANO COMMUNITY CLEAN UP DAY - P 06/25/21 32.32 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-KOLANO POSTAGE 06/25/21 24.90 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-KOLANO POSTAGE 06/25/21 10.54 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-LOJEK PROGRAMMING SUPPLIES 06/25/21 329.00 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-LOJEK ALL IN ONE VIRTUAL REALITY H 06/25/21 375.92 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-LOJEK PINBACK BUTTON SET 06/25/21 50.60 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-LOJEK ZOOM SUBSCRIPTION 06/25/21 14.99 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-LOJEK MOVIE LICENSING 06/25/21 225.00 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-LOJEK MOVIE LICENSING 06/25/21 70.00 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-LOJEK MOVIE LICENSING 06/25/21 150.00 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-LOJEK BOOK COVERS 06/25/21 56.00 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-LOJEK BOOK COVERS 06/25/21 17.48 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-LOJEK FIRST BOOK 06/25/21 74.19 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-LOJEK WALL STREET JOURNAL 06/25/21 180.20 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-LOJEK FIRST BOOK 06/25/21 4.80 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-MCCOR IRONTON ATV SPOT SPRAYER 06/25/21 159.58 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-MCCOR POWER AMP, 18'DESK BASE CA 06/25/21 707.99 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-MCCOR TRIMMER HEAD SPRINGS 06/25/21 19.02 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-MCCOR ANTENNA, BATTERY 06/25/21 160.03 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-PALMER CAR WASH 06/25/21 8.00 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-PALMER REIMB - MPD206,214,206 06/25/21 44.52 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-PALMER 45X53 HARD FLOOR 06/25/21 52.99 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-PALMER SUNBLOCK - SWAT TRAINING 06/25/21 21.14 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-PALMER SWAT TRAINING - PALMER, ARR 06/25/21 79.51 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-PALMER SWAT TRAINING - PALMER, ARR 06/25/21 119.91 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-PAPE CAR WASH 06/25/21 8.00 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-PAPE CAR WASH 06/25/21 8.00 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-RYSKA GLOCK TRAINING - MCPHERSO 06/25/21 250.00 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-RYSKA FLOORLINER 06/25/21 251.09 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-RYSKA PADFOLIO - RESUME 06/25/21 33.56 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-SIMS 2 HARDSHELL CASES, 2 KEYBO 06/25/21 49.97 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-SIMS 1 HARD CASE 2 KEYBOARD COV 06/25/21 31.97- 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-SIMS 1 HARD CASE 06/25/21 17.99- 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-SIMS POSTAGE 06/25/21 13.69 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-SIMS NMEC EXAM 06/25/21 25.00 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-SIMS DWT2-22171 LICENSE 06/25/21 30.00 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-SIMS DWD2-22172 LICENSE 06/25/21 30.00 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-SIMS FUEL FOR TESTING 06/25/21 68.04 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-SIMS AWWA/DUES 06/25/21 377.00 CITY OF McCALL Payment Approval Report - Vendor Page: 13 Report dates: 7/2/2021-7/15/2021 Jul 15, 2021 02:39PM

Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Invoice Date Net Invoice Amount

31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-SPICKAR APPRECIATION LUNCH POST CO 06/25/21 745.43 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-SPICKAR LIBRARY EXPANSION CHARETT 06/25/21 21.35 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-SPICKAR LIBRARY EXPANSION DESIGN P 06/25/21 27.04 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-SPICKAR AIC PARKING 06/25/21 15.00 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-SPICKAR AIC PARKING 06/25/21 15.00 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-STEIN POSTAGE 06/25/21 12.40 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-T MALVI PARKING AIC MTG 06/25/21 10.75 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-T MALVI AIC MTG - MEAL 06/25/21 34.70 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-T MALVI AIC MTG - HOTEL & PARKING 06/25/21 407.42 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-TATUM CAR WASH 06/25/21 8.00 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WAGNE COLOR TABS, LABELS, LASER L 06/25/21 64.17 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WAGNE AIC CONFERENCE - BESSIEJO, 06/25/21 63.52 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WAGNE AIC CONFERENCE - TRACY 06/25/21 33.50 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WAGNE HOTEL FOR AIC CONF AND PAR 06/25/21 111.42 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WAGNE HOTEL FOR AIC CONF AND PAR 06/25/21 417.00 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WANN CAR WASH 06/25/21 8.00 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WEAVER POSTAGE 06/25/21 10.60 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WEAVER MECHANICAL PENCIL 06/25/21 25.47 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WEAVER BOAT LINES & DOCK TIES 06/25/21 29.95- 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WEAVER BIC PENS, CALCULATOR 06/25/21 30.45 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WEAVER EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION 06/25/21 98.02 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WEAVER EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION 06/25/21 37.80 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WEAVER EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION 06/25/21 15.05 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WEAVER CLOCK WILL RETURN, WILL BE B 06/25/21 5.95 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WEAVER EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION 06/25/21 169.00 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WEAVER EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION 06/25/21 65.00 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WEAVER EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION 06/25/21 26.00 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WEAVER NOTEBOOKS, CALCULATOR 06/25/21 26.43 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WEAVER MONITOR RISERS 06/25/21 58.42 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WEAVER STICKY NOTES 06/25/21 11.91 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WILLIAM 9MM MAGPUMP HOPPER FED D 06/25/21 144.99 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WILLIAM CAR WASH 06/25/21 9.00

Total U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES: 9,205.48

UNIFORMS2GEAR INC. 31175 UNIFORMS2GEAR INC. 113047 ACADIA BLACK SHOES 04/15/21 554.74

Total UNIFORMS2GEAR INC.: 554.74

UNUM LIFE INS. CO. OF AMERICA 31410 UNUM LIFE INS. CO. OF AMERI 202107-LIFE LIFE INS. #0094659-001 2 06/15/21 1,012.90 31410 UNUM LIFE INS. CO. OF AMERI 202107-VLIFE LIFE INS. #0094658-001 5 06/15/21 643.44

Total UNUM LIFE INS. CO. OF AMERICA: 1,656.34

UTILITY TRAILER SALES OF BOISE 31580 UTILITY TRAILER SALES OF BO 69539PB 4" ROUND S 07/12/21 33.80 31580 UTILITY TRAILER SALES OF BO 69578PB LUBERFINER 07/12/21 21.78

Total UTILITY TRAILER SALES OF BOISE: 55.58

VALLEY COUNTY 31640 VALLEY COUNTY 20210702 CITY OF MCCALL CONTRIBUTIO 07/02/21 35,000.00 CITY OF McCALL Payment Approval Report - Vendor Page: 14 Report dates: 7/2/2021-7/15/2021 Jul 15, 2021 02:39PM

Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Invoice Date Net Invoice Amount

31640 VALLEY COUNTY 2021-AUGUST PD FACILITY LEASE 07/15/21 2,700.00

Total VALLEY COUNTY: 37,700.00

VERIZON WIRELESS 32020 VERIZON WIRELESS 9881038338 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 06/01/21 358.20 32020 VERIZON WIRELESS 9881038338 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 06/01/21 126.76 32020 VERIZON WIRELESS 9881038338 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 06/01/21 261.98 32020 VERIZON WIRELESS 9881038338 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 06/01/21 358.35 32020 VERIZON WIRELESS 9881038338 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 06/01/21 41.74 32020 VERIZON WIRELESS 9881038338 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 06/01/21 133.49 32020 VERIZON WIRELESS 9881038338 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 06/01/21 165.76 32020 VERIZON WIRELESS 9881038338 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 06/01/21 123.49 32020 VERIZON WIRELESS 9881038338 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 06/01/21 41.74 32020 VERIZON WIRELESS 9881038338 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 06/01/21 1,360.10 32020 VERIZON WIRELESS 9881038338 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 06/01/21 50.01 32020 VERIZON WIRELESS 9882802131 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 06/26/21 880.94 32020 VERIZON WIRELESS 9882802131 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 06/26/21 41.74 32020 VERIZON WIRELESS 9883190918 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 07/01/21 174.90 32020 VERIZON WIRELESS 9883190918 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 07/01/21 126.75 32020 VERIZON WIRELESS 9883190918 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 07/01/21 253.11 32020 VERIZON WIRELESS 9883190918 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 07/01/21 361.46 32020 VERIZON WIRELESS 9883190918 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 07/01/21 41.73 32020 VERIZON WIRELESS 9883190918 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 07/01/21 133.47 32020 VERIZON WIRELESS 9883190918 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 07/01/21 165.20 32020 VERIZON WIRELESS 9883190918 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 07/01/21 123.47 32020 VERIZON WIRELESS 9883190918 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 07/01/21 50.56 32020 VERIZON WIRELESS 9883190918 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 07/01/21 292.90 32020 VERIZON WIRELESS 9883190918 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 07/01/21 48.67

Total VERIZON WIRELESS: 5,716.52

WELLS FARGO EQUIPMENT FINANCE 32560 WELLS FARGO EQUIPMENT FIN 5015726391-P XEROX C7025 #6030192296000 06/29/21 221.31 32560 WELLS FARGO EQUIPMENT FIN 5015749879-A/ XEROX C405 #603-0173151 06/27 07/01/21 28.87 32560 WELLS FARGO EQUIPMENT FIN 5015749879-A/ XEROX C405 #603-0173151 06/27 07/01/21 28.86 32560 WELLS FARGO EQUIPMENT FIN 5015749880-P XEROX C8045 #603-0173257-000 07/01/21 497.69 32560 WELLS FARGO EQUIPMENT FIN 5015821715 XEROX C8045 #603-0214726-000 07/07/21 170.25

Total WELLS FARGO EQUIPMENT FINANCE: 946.98

WHITE PETERSON P.A. 32910 WHITE PETERSON P.A. 146251 GENERAL CITY ADMIN 06/30/21 7,000.00

Total WHITE PETERSON P.A.: 7,000.00

WILBUR-ELLIS COMPANY LLC 33060 WILBUR-ELLIS COMPANY LLC 14412283 Gallon of Briskway Fungicide 06/23/21 1,246.00 33060 WILBUR-ELLIS COMPANY LLC 14435537 RYE SEED, BLUE/RYE SEED 06/29/21 460.00 33060 WILBUR-ELLIS COMPANY LLC 14435537 Chemical Order 06/29/21 399.50

Total WILBUR-ELLIS COMPANY LLC: 2,105.50 CITY OF McCALL Payment Approval Report - Vendor Page: 15 Report dates: 7/2/2021-7/15/2021 Jul 15, 2021 02:39PM

Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Invoice Date Net Invoice Amount

WILLAMETTE DENTAL INSURANCE 33095 WILLAMETTE DENTAL INSURA 202107 PREMIUMS - GROUP #Z1759 - ID 07/01/21 2,883.20 33095 WILLAMETTE DENTAL INSURA 202107-COBR PREMIUMS - GROUP #Z1759 - ID 07/01/21 90.00

Total WILLAMETTE DENTAL INSURANCE: 2,973.20

ZIPLY FIBER 33560 ZIPLY FIBER 0721-0267 PHONE SERVICE - AIRPORT - 20 07/01/21 65.03 33560 ZIPLY FIBER 0721-0944 PHONE SERVICE - ETHERNET - 07/07/21 1,280.00 33560 ZIPLY FIBER 0721-1008 PHONE SERVICE - SCADA/WT - 2 07/07/21 62.27 33560 ZIPLY FIBER 0721-1252 PHONE SERVICE - WATER PLAN 07/07/21 328.19 33560 ZIPLY FIBER 0721-2144 PHONE SERVICE - POLICE - 208- 07/07/21 29.28 33560 ZIPLY FIBER 0721-3038 PHONE SERVICE - CITY HALL - 2 07/07/21 39.49 33560 ZIPLY FIBER 0721-4170 PHONE SERVICE - CITY SHOP - 07/07/21 44.83 33560 ZIPLY FIBER 0721-4493 PHONE SERVICE - CITY HALL - 2 07/07/21 38.85

Total ZIPLY FIBER: 1,887.94

Grand Totals: 1,399,404.31 CITY OF McCALL Payment Approval Report - Vendor Page: 1 Report dates: 7/11/2021-7/11/2021 Jul 21, 2021 02:57PM

Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Invoice Date Net Invoice Amount

ALBERTSONS LLC 1850 ALBERTSONS LLC 00729510-051 CED GOING AWAY GATHERING 05/19/21 60.68

Total ALBERTSONS LLC: 60.68

CASCADE COMMUNICATIONS LLC 6324 CASCADE COMMUNICATIONS L 322 CONSULTING SERVICES - VOICE 07/14/21 6,850.00

Total CASCADE COMMUNICATIONS LLC: 6,850.00

CHEVRON TEXACO 6760 CHEVRON TEXACO 72728583-PR FUEL 07/06/21 1,385.06

Total CHEVRON TEXACO: 1,385.06

SPARKLIGHT 28656 SPARKLIGHT 20210708 INTERNET - ACCT # 112663760 J 07/08/21 123.72 28656 SPARKLIGHT 20210708 INTERNET - ACCT # 112663760 J 07/08/21 115.71

Total SPARKLIGHT: 239.43

STATE INSURANCE FUND 29020 STATE INSURANCE FUND 25202455 PREMIUM INSTALLMENT - #1635 07/12/21 37,835.00

Total STATE INSURANCE FUND: 37,835.00

STATE TAX COMMISSION 29060 STATE TAX COMMISSION 202106 SALES TAX 06/30/21 59.25 29060 STATE TAX COMMISSION 202106 SALES TAX SHORT 06/30/21 .01- 29060 STATE TAX COMMISSION 202106 SALES TAX 06/30/21 130.99 29060 STATE TAX COMMISSION 202106 SALES TAX OVER 06/30/21 3.50

Total STATE TAX COMMISSION: 193.73

T-MOBILE INC 30332 T-MOBILE INC 20210704 TESTING T MOBILE 07/04/21 59.22

Total T-MOBILE INC: 59.22

U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-BISOM FLIGHTAWARE TOOLBOX 06/25/21 95.00 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-BISOM CABLE PROTECTOR RAMP 06/25/21 74.19 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-CURTIN AIC CONFERENCE - CURTIN 06/25/21 365.00 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-CURTIN MEAL - AIC MTG 06/25/21 10.32 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-CURTIN MEAL - AIC MTG 06/25/21 33.36 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-CURTIN MOTEL - AIC MTG 06/25/21 539.46 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-GIESSEN CAR WASH 06/25/21 8.00 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-GIESSEN POSTAGE 06/25/21 13.30 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-GREAVE MEDIA MAILING LIST FOR THE N 06/25/21 32.22 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-GREAVE SURVEYMONKEY.COM - ANNUAL 06/25/21 384.00 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-GREAVE BUSINESS CARD - E GREAVES 06/25/21 32.96 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-GREAVE TOURS ARE NOW AVAILABLE - G 06/25/21 7.10 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-GREAVE PROMOTING MCCALL GOLF CLU 06/25/21 24.94 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-GREAVE AIRPORT OPEN HOUSE 06/25/21 41.21 CITY OF McCALL Payment Approval Report - Vendor Page: 2 Report dates: 7/11/2021-7/11/2021 Jul 21, 2021 02:57PM

Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Invoice Date Net Invoice Amount

31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-GROENE LIGHTNING USB CABLE 06/25/21 20.33 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-GROENE LIGHTNING USB CABLE 06/25/21 20.33 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-GROENE MAGSAFE CHARGER 06/25/21 41.73 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-GROENE COLOR DUPLEX DOCUMENT SC 06/25/21 932.79 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-JOVANO HEADSET 06/25/21 149.99 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-JOVANO DIGITAL PHONE SYSTEM 06/25/21 134.99 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-JOVANO DIGITAL PHONE SYSTEM 06/25/21 159.98 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-SIMS1 2 HARDSHELL CASES, 1 KEYBO 06/25/21 49.97 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-SIMS1 1 HARD CASE 2 KEYBOARD COV 06/25/21 31.97- 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-SIMS1 1 HARD CASE 06/25/21 17.99- 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-SIMS1 POSTAGE 06/25/21 13.69 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-SIMS1 NMEC EXAM 06/25/21 25.00 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-SIMS1 DWT2-22171 LICENSE 06/25/21 30.00 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-SIMS1 DWD2-22172 LICENSE 06/25/21 30.00 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-SIMS1 FUEL FOR TESTING 06/25/21 68.04 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-SIMS1 AWWA/DUES 06/25/21 377.00 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WHEATO IT-DUMP TICKET 06/25/21 28.35 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WHEATO IT-DUMP TICKET 06/25/21 30.00 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WHEATO 12 VOLT D 06/25/21 6.25 31020 U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES 0621-WILLIAM 9MM MAGPUMP HOPPER FED D 06/25/21 .05-

Total U.S. BANK - CARD SERVICES: 3,729.49

XERILLION CORPORATION 33418 XERILLION CORPORATION 65136 Global PO# for monthly charges rel 06/30/21 4,463.33

Total XERILLION CORPORATION: 4,463.33

Grand Totals: 54,815.94 BLANK PAGE

McCALL CITY COUNCIL 216 East Park Street AGENDA BILL McCall, Idaho 83638 Number AB 21-187 Meeting Date July 22, 2021

AGENDA ITEM INFORMATION SUBJECT: Originator Department Approvals Initials or Supporter City Licenses Report to Council Per McCall City Mayor / Council Code City Manager Clerk Originator Treasurer Community Development Police Department Public Works Golf Course COST IMPACT: n/a Parks and Recreation FUNDING n/a Airport SOURCE: Library TIMELINE: n/a Information Systems Grant Coordinator SUMMARY STATEMENT: Per McCall City Code Title 4 Chapter 9, the City Council has determined the City Clerk shall be delegated the authority to process and grant or deny all alcoholic beverage license applications, other than certain circumstances involving catering permits, which the City Clerk shall review the application for catering permit for completeness and forward said application to the Police Chief. The Police Chief upon receipt of the application shall make a recommendation to the City Clerk to approve or deny the application. Whenever the City Clerk shall determine that an application for alcoholic beverage license transfer or renewal is complete, the City Clerk shall approve or deny such application. All decisions of the City Clerk shall be reported to the City Council at the next regularly scheduled City Council meeting after such decision.

The City Clerk is also responsible for all processing of business, taxi, snow removal, pawnbroker, child daycare licenses, vendor permits, and public event applications.

Please see the attached Clerk Report for the last two weeks.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Council to review the License report.

RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE ACTION

City Clerk’s License Report

Council Meeting: July 22, 2021

Business License Activity Tr Close New n s

Business Name Type of Business Address fr BL# Issued

Berlum General Contractor - 2990 Wise Way, X 2495 7/8/2021 Development LLC Construction Boise 2K Innovations Inc. Management 106 E. Park Street X 2501 7/8/2021 Consulting Services Suite 205 CannaBee CBD Retail CBD & 212 N 3rd Street X 2502 7/8/2021 LLC Wellness Products The Glass House Meeting Center & 1410 Mill Road X 2508 7/8/2021 Lodging (satellite extension of Hotel McCall) Kindall Construction General Contractor - 62 Garden Lane X 2511 7/12/2021 Construction

Alcohol License Activity New Renewal Closed

Physical Business Name Owner(s) BL# Issued Comment Address

No Activity

Catering Permit Activity Location of Day & Date of Time of Name of Licensee Event Revenue Event Event Event Delish Catering Ponderosa Center 1117 E Lake St Friday, July 2 6:00pm - $20 Concert Series 10:00pm Delish Catering Ponderosa Center 1117 E Lake St Tues, July 6 6:00pm - $20 Concert Series 10:00pm Delish Catering Ponderosa Center 1117 E Lake St Tues, July 13 6:00pm - $20 Concert Series 10:00pm Delish Catering Ponderosa Center 1117 E Lake St Tues, July 20 6:00pm - $20 Concert Series 10:00pm Delish Catering Ponderosa Center 1117 E Lake St Tues, July 27 6:00pm - $20 Concert Series 10:00pm

City Clerk’s License Report

Outdoor Public Events/Vendor Permit Activity Date(s) of Time of Road Applicant Event Location of Event Event Event Closure Delvon Lamarr Ponderosa Center 1117 E Lake St 2-Jul 6:00pm - No Organ Trio Concert Series 10:00pm Light Up The Gold Glove Park Gold Glove Park July 3 & 4 8:00am - No Night Softball Softball Tournament 7:00pm Rustic Outlet 2nd Saturday Art & 110 N. 3rd Street 10-Jul 10:00am - No Vintage Pop Up 5:00pm

Peddler Permit Activity Company Date(s) Fees Applicant Product Sold Permit # Represented Permitted Collected No Activity

Snow Removal Operator Permit Activity Denied Decal Permit Business Name Owner Address BL# Date Numbers Issued

No Activity

Taxi & Commercial Transportation Driver License Activity Denied City Taxi Date License Business Name Driver Name Address BL# License# Approved Expires

No Activity

BLANK PAGE McCALL CITY COUNCIL 216 East Park Street AGENDA BILL McCall, Idaho 83638 Number AB 21-190 Meeting Date July 22, 2021

AGENDA ITEM INFORMATION SUBJECT: Originator Department Approvals Initials or Supporter Mayor / Council Treasurer’s Report as Required by IC 50-208 City Manager Clerk Treasurer Originator Community Development Police Department Public Works Golf Course COST IMPACT: N/A Parks and Recreation FUNDING N/A Airport SOURCE: Library TIMELINE: Report Only Information Systems Grant Coordinator SUMMARY STATEMENT: Treasurer’s report of accounts and activity of office during the month of June 2021 regarding care, management or disposition of moneys, property or business of the City.

Attached is the June 2021 Report

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

The Council shall examine the report and determine whether additional information from the Treasurer is required.

RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE ACTION

City of McCall, Idaho Monthly Financial Dashboard Issued on July 13, 2021

Reporting Period: June 2021

Our Investments and Cash… Major Fund Cash Flows… Balances as of June 2021

As % of As % of FY16- General Fund – Cash & Investments General Fund Revenues and Expense Budget FY20 Avg. Actual June 2021 $ 7,604,204 Fiscal Year 2021 Budget $ 9,957,972 June 2020 $ 6,879,848 Revenues to Date $ 5,876,302 59.01% 87.24% Unavailable Cash Reserves $ 1,580,330 Expenditures to Date $ 5,586,242 56.10% 90.65% Restricted Cash - Franchise Fees $ 1,053,876 Revenues over Expenditures $ 290,060 Available Cash $ 4,969,998 Street Fund Revenues and Expenditures Streets Fund - Cash & Investments Fiscal Year 2021 Budget $ 2,580,839 June 2021 $ 1,252,518 Revenues to Date $ 1,459,990 56.57% 72.42% June 2020 $ 1,309,174 Expenditures to Date $ 1,534,031 59.44% 78.66% Unavailable Cash Reserves $ 449,914 Revenues over Expenditures $ (74,041) Available Cash $ 802,604 Library Fund Revenues and Expenditures Library Fund - Cash & Investments Fiscal Year 2021 Budget $ 1,048,664 June 2021 $ 875,043 Revenues to Date $ 377,197 35.97% 83.05% June 2020 $ 644,652 Expenditures to Date $ 367,881 35.08% 116.06% Unavailable Cash Reserves $ 111,254 Revenues over Expenditures $ 9,317 Restricted Cash - Bldg Fund $ 511,695 Available Cash $ 252,094 Recreation Fund Revenues and Expenditures Fiscal Year 2021 Budget $ 4,859,250 Recreation Fund - Cash & Investments Revenues to Date $ 1,160,213 23.88% 83.05% June 2021 $ 324,875 Expenditures to Date $ 1,553,320 31.97% 116.06% June 2020 $ 469,466 Revenues over Expenditures $ (393,107) Unavailable Cash Reserves $ 236,870 Available Cash $ 88,005 Airport Fund Revenues and Expenditures Fiscal Year 2021 Budget $ 3,304,192 Airport Fund - Cash & Investments Revenues to Date $ 2,348,842 71.09% 108.95% June 2021 $ 905,113 Expenditures to Date $ 2,670,803 80.83% 129.99% June 2020 $ 952,132 Revenues over Expenditures $ (321,960) Unavailable Cash Reserves $ 75,387 Available Cash $ 829,726 Local Option Tax - Streets Fund Revenues and Expenditures Fiscal Year 2021 Budget $ 2,254,139 Capital Projects Fund-Cash & Investments Revenues to Date $ 1,802,989 79.99% 82.41% June 2021 $ 70,361 Expenditures to Date $ 536,688 23.81% 26.40% June 2020 $ (4,331) Revenues over Expenditures $ 1,266,301

Local Option Tax - Cash & Investments Water Fund Revenues and Expenditures June 2021 $ 1,724,052 Fiscal Year 2021 Budget $ 4,197,499 June 2020 $ 1,018,355 Revenues to Date $ 2,855,268 68.02% 99.91% Available Cash $ 705,698 Expenditures to Date $ 2,468,809 58.82% 113.94% Revenues over Expenditures $ 386,459

Page 1 of 3 City of McCall, Idaho Monthly Financial Dashboard Issued on July 13, 2021

Reporting Period: June 2021

cont'd Specific Revenue Collections at a G, Our Investments and Cash… Balances as of June 2021 As % of As % of FY16- Property Tax Collection Budget FY20 Avg. Golf Fund - Cash & Investments Fiscal Year 2021 Budget $ 6,437,590 June 2021 $ 592,695 Revenues to Date $ 4,341,888 67.45% 76.98% June 2020 $ 229,109 Unavailable Cash Reserves $ 205,110 State Shared Revenue Collection Available Cash $ 387,585 Fiscal Year 2021 Budget $ 1,031,832 Revenues to Date $ 624,496 60.52% 63.15% Water Fund - Cash & Investments June 2021 $ 5,202,503 Building Permit Revenue Collection June 2020 $ 4,475,120 Fiscal Year 2021 Budget $ 300,000 Unavailable Cash Reserves $ 515,500 Revenues to Date $ 361,018 120.34% 103.91% Restricted Cash - DEQ Loan Reserve $ 392,030 Available Cash $ 4,294,973 Local OptionTax - Tourism Revenue Collection Fiscal Year 2021 Budget $ 650,866 Revenues to Date $ 599,555 92.12% 141.62%

Local OptionTax - Streets Revenue Collection* Fiscal Year 2021 Budget $ 1,798,459 Revenues to Date $ 1,740,662 96.79% 97.49% *New Tax and Fund as of January 1, 2016 (percent avg. is 2 year comparison)

McCall Redevelopment Agency… As % of FY16- As % of FY20 Avg. MRA Fund Revenues and Expenditures Budget Actual Urban Renewal Fund-Cash & Investments Fiscal Year 2021 Budget $ 2,017,381 June 2021 $ 1,400,788 Revenues to Date $ 599,449 29.71% 81.75% June 2020 $ 1,193,632 Expenditures to Date $ 477,761 23.68% 97.64% Unavailable Cash Reserves $ 100,000 Revenues over Expenditures $ 121,688 Restricted Cash - Bond Reserves $ - Available Cash $ 1,300,788 Urban Renewal Property Tax Collection Fiscal Year 2021 Budget $ 793,819 Revenue to Date $ 580,552 73.13% 81.46%

MRA Cash Flow Prior Year Comparison. . . Fiscal Year 2021: June Fiscal Year 2020: June McCall Redevelopment Agency Percentage McCall Redevelopment Agency Percentage Fiscal Year 2021 Budget $ 2,017,381 Fiscal Year 2020 Budget $ 1,851,214 Revenues to Date $ 599,449 29.71% Revenues to Date $ 567,977 30.68% Expenditures to Date $ 477,761 23.68% Expenditures to Date $ 460,108 24.85% Revenues over Expenditures $ 121,688 Revenues over Expenditures $ 107,869

Page 2 of 3 City of McCall, Idaho Monthly Financial Dashboard Issued on July 13, 2021

Reporting Period: June 2021

Our Cash Flows Prior Year Comparison June 2021 June 2020 General Fund Percentage General Fund Percentage Fiscal Year 2021 Budget $ 9,957,972 Fiscal Year 2020 Budget $ 10,697,888 Revenues to Date $ 5,876,302 59.01% Revenues to Date $ 5,040,539 47.12% Expenditures to Date $ 5,586,242 56.10% Expenditures to Date $ 5,256,395 49.13% Revenues over Expenditures $ 290,060 Revenues over Expenditures $ (215,856) Streets Fund Streets Fund Fiscal Year 2021 Budget $ 2,580,839 Fiscal Year 2020 Budget $ 3,676,555 Revenues to Date $ 1,459,990 56.57% Revenues to Date $ 1,470,388 39.99% Expenditures to Date $ 1,534,031 59.44% Expenditures to Date $ 1,614,156 43.90% Revenues over Expenditures $ (74,041) Revenues over Expenditures $ (143,767) Library Fund Library Fund Fiscal Year 2021 Budget $ 1,048,664 Fiscal Year 2020 Budget $ 1,343,147 Revenues to Date $ 377,197 35.97% Revenues to Date $ 337,890 25.16% Expenditures to Date $ 367,881 35.08% Expenditures to Date $ 469,760 34.97% Revenues over Expenditures $ 9,317 Revenues over Expenditures $ (131,870) Recreation Fund Recreation Fund Fiscal Year 2021 Budget $ 4,859,250 Fiscal Year 2020 Budget $ 2,278,816 Revenues to Date $ 1,160,213 23.88% Revenues to Date $ 941,685 41.32% Expenditures to Date $ 1,553,320 31.97% Expenditures to Date $ 954,695 41.89% Revenues over Expenditures $ (393,107) Revenues over Expenditures $ (13,010) Airport Fund Airport Fund Fiscal Year 2021 Budget $ 3,304,192 Fiscal Year 2020 Budget $ 11,832,250 Revenues to Date $ 2,348,842 71.09% Revenues to Date $ 659,264 5.57% Expenditures to Date $ 2,670,803 80.83% Expenditures to Date $ 635,861 5.37% Revenues over Expenditures $ (321,960) Revenues over Expenditures $ 23,403 Local Option Tax (Streets) Fund Local Option Tax (Streets) Fund Fiscal Year 2021 Budget $ 2,254,139 Fiscal Year 2020 Budget $ 4,548,572 Revenues to Date $ 1,802,989 79.99% Revenues to Date $ 1,786,928 39.29% Expenditures to Date $ 536,688 23.81% Expenditures to Date $ 2,141,066 47.07% Revenues over Expenditures $ 1,266,301 Revenues over Expenditures $ (354,138) Golf Fund Golf Fund Fiscal Year 2021 Budget $ 1,275,999 Fiscal Year 2020 Budget $ 1,224,577 Revenues to Date $ 632,369 49.56% Revenues to Date $ 507,966 41.48% Expenditures to Date $ 642,616 50.36% Expenditures to Date $ 644,610 52.64% Revenues over Expenditures $ (10,247) Revenues over Expenditures $ (136,644) Water Fund Water Fund Fiscal Year 2021 Budget $ 4,197,499 Fiscal Year 2020 Budget $ 3,437,576 Revenues to Date $ 2,855,268 68.02% Revenues to Date $ 2,429,715 70.68% Expenditures to Date $ 2,468,809 58.82% Expenditures to Date $ 1,557,076 45.30% Revenues over Expenditures $ 386,459 Revenues over Expenditures $ 872,638

Page 3 of 3

McCALL CITY COUNCIL 216 East Park Street AGENDA BILL McCall, Idaho 83638 Number AB 21-186 Meeting Date July 22, 2021

AGENDA ITEM INFORMATION SUBJECT: Originator Department Approvals Initials or Supporter Request Acceptance of the Federal Aviation Mayor / Council Administration grant award for the design portion City Manager Clerk of the new East-West taxiway. Treasurer Community Development Police Department Public Works Golf Course COST IMPACT: $162,045 Parks and Recreation FUNDING 100% FAA grant funded Airport Originator SOURCE: Library TIMELINE: Signed documents to the FAA by July 31, Information Systems 2021. Grant Coordinator SUMMARY STATEMENT: As part of the Taxiway Relocation Project, the “diagonal” taxiway was removed to increase the amount of leasable space in the infield area. To maintain the aircraft flow on the northeast ramp, a new replacement taxiway has been planned.

The original grant application request was for funding the entire project. However, the FAA wants to split the project over 2 years – with design occurring in CY 2021, and construction occurring in CY 2022.

The FAA has set aside $162,045 for the taxiway design portion of the project. The entire AIP grant is $1,666,571.00. The funding is a 100% grant.

Bids are expected to be advertised early in 2022, with construction starting on July 5, 2022. The estimated completion time is October of 2022.

Attachments: Notice of Award and Agreement

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Accept the Federal Aviation Administration grant award for the design of the new East-West taxiway and Authorize the Mayor to Sign all Necessary Documents. RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE ACTION Mar. 11, 2021 AB 21-065 Professional Services agreement with T-O Engineers Mar. 25, 2021 AB 21-093 AIP 31 Grant Application for East-West Taxiway

3-16-0023-031-2021

U.S. Department Airports Division of Transportation 2725 Skyway Dr. Northwest Mountain Region Federal Aviation Helena, MT 59602 Idaho, Montana Administration

July 7, 2021

The Honorable Robert S. Giles, Mayor City of McCall 216 East Park Street McCall, ID 83638-0001

Dear Mayor Giles: We are transmitting to you for execution the Grant Offer for Airport Improvement Program (AIP) Project No. 3-16-0023-031-2021 at McCall Municipal Airport in McCall. Idaho. This letter outlines expectations for success. Please read the conditions and assurances carefully. To properly enter into this agreement, you must do the following:

a. The governing body must provide authority to execute the grant to the individual signing the grant; i.e. the sponsor's authorized representative. b. The sponsor's authorized representative must execute the grant by providing their electronic signature. c. Once the sponsor's authorized representative has electronically signed the grant, the sponsor's attorney will automatically be sent via email the grant to provide their electronic signature.

d. You may not make any modification to the text, terms or conditions of the grant offer.

e. Following the attorney's action, the executed grant will be automatically sent to all parties as an attachment to an email. Subject to the requirements in 2 CFR §200.305, each payment request for reimbursement under this grant must be made electronically via the Delphi elnvoicing System. Please see the attached Grant Agreement for more information regarding the use of this System. The terms and conditions of this agreement require you to complete the project without undue delay. We will be monitoring your progress to ensure proper stewardship of these Federal funds. We expect you to submit payment requests for reimbursement of allowable incurred project expenses consistent with project progress. Should you fail to make draws on a regular basis, your grant may be placed in "inactive" status, which will affect your ability to receive future grant offers. Until the grant is completed and closed, you are responsible for submitting formal reports as follows: • A signed/dated SF-270 (non-construction projects) or SF-271 or equivalent (construction projects) and SF-425 annually, due 90 days after the end of each federal fiscal year in which this grant is open (due December 31 of each year this grant is open); and • Performance Reports, which are due within 30 days of the end of a reporting period as follows: 1. Non-construction project: Due annually at end of the Federal fiscal year. 2. Construction project: Submit FAA form 5370-1, Construction Progress and Inspection Report at the end of each fiscal quarter.

1 3-16-0023-031-2021

As a condition of receiving Federal assistance under this award, you must comply with audit requirements as established under 2 CFR part 200. Subpart F requires non-Federal entities that expend $750,000 or more in Federal awards to conduct a single or program specific audit for that year. Note that this includes Federal expenditures made under other Federal-assistance programs. Please take appropriate and necessary action to assure your organization will comply with applicable audit requirements and standards. Once the project{s) is completed and all costs are determined, we ask that you close the project without delay and submit the necessary final closeout documentation as required by your Region/Airports District Office. Gary Gates, {406) 441-5405, is the assigned program manager for this grant and is readily available to assist you and your designated representative with the requirements stated herein. We sincerely value your cooperation in these efforts and look forward to working with you to complete this important project.

Sincerely,

Steve L. Engebrecht Acting Manager

2 3-16-0023-031-2021

U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration FAA Airport Improvement Program (AIP}

GRANT AGREEMENT Part I - Offer

Federal Award Offer Date July 7, 2021

Airport/Planning Area McCall Municipal Airport

FY2021 AIP Grant Number 3-16-0023-031-2021 (DOT-FA21NM-2038}

Unique Entity Identifier 188922611

TO: City of McCall

(herein called the "Sponsor")

FROM: The United States of America (acting through the Federal Aviation Administration, herein called the "FAA")

WHEREAS, the Sponsor has submitted to the FAA a Project Application dated March 25, 2021, for a grant of Federal funds for a project at or associated with the McCall Municipal Airport, which is included as part of this Grant Agreement; and WHEREAS, the FAA has approved a project for the McCall Municipal Airport (herein called the "Project") consisting of the following: Reconstruct apron taxiway (phase I - design) which is more fully described in the Project Application. NOW THEREFORE, Pursuant to and for the purpose of carrying out the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018 (Public Law Number 115-254); Title 49, United States Code (U.S.C.), Chapters 471 and 475; 49 U.S.C. §§ 40101 et seq., and 48103; the Department ofTransportation Appropriations Act, 2021 (Public Law 116- 260, Division L), as further amended by the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (Public Law 117-2); and the representations contained in the Project Application; and in consideration of: (a) the Sponsor's adoption and ratification of the Grant Assurances attached hereto (b) the Sponsor's acceptance of this Offer; and (c) the benefits to accrue to the United States and the public from the accomplishment of the Project and compliance with the Grant Assurance and conditions as herein provided;

1 3-16-0023-031-2021

THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE UNITED STATES, HEREBY OFFERS AND AGREES to pay 100 percent of the allowable costs incurred accomplishing the Project as the United States share of the Project. Assistance listings Number (Formerly CFDA Number): 20.106 This Offer is made on and SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING TERMS AND CONDITIONS:

CONDITIONS

1. Maximum Obligation. The maximum obligation of the United States payable under this Offer is $162,045. The following amounts represent a breakdown of the maximum obligation for the purpose of establishing allowable amounts for any future grant amendment, which may increase the foregoing maximum obligation of the United States under the provisions of 49 U.S.C. § 47108(b): $ 0 for planning $ 162,045 for airport development or noise program implementation; and, $ 0 for land acquisition. 2. Grant Performance. This Grant Agreement is subject to the following Federal award requirements:

a. Period of Performance: 1. Shall start on the date the Sponsor formally accepts this Agreement and is the date signed by the last Sponsor signatory to the Agreement. The end date of the Period of Performance is 4 years (1,460 calendar days) from the date of acceptance. The Period of Performance end date shall not affect, relieve, or reduce Sponsor obligations and assurances that extend beyond the closeout of this Grant Agreement.

2. Means the total estimated time interval between the start of an initial Federal award and the planned end date, which may include one or more funded portions or budget periods. (2 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) § 200.1).

b. Budget Period: 1. For this Grant is 4 years (1,460 calendar days) and follows the same start and end date as the period of performance provided in Paragraph a.1. Pursuant to 2 CFR § 200.403(h), the Sponsor may charge to the Grant only allowable costs incurred during the Budget Period.

2. Means the time interval from the start date of a funded portion of an award to the end date of that funded portion during which the Sponsor is authorized to expend the funds awarded, including any funds carried forward or other .revisions pursuant to§ 200.308. c. Close Out and Termination 1. Unless the FAA authorizes a written extension, the Sponsor must submit all Grant closeout documentation and liquidate (pay-off) all obligations incurred under this award no later than 120 calendar days after the end date of the period of performance. If the Sponsor does not submit all required closeout documentation within this time period, the FAA will proceed to close out the grant within one year of the period of performance end date with the information available at the end of 120 days. (2 CFR § 200.344).

2 3-16-0023-031-2021

2. The FAA may terminate this Grant, in whole or in part, in accordance with the conditions set forth in 2 CFR § 200.340, or other Federal regulatory or statutory authorities as applicable.

3. Ineligible or Unallowable Costs. The Sponsor must not include any costs in the project that the FAA has determined to be ineligible or unallowable.

4. Determining the Final Federal Share of Costs. The United States' share of allowable project costs will be made in accordance with 49 U.S.C. § 47109, the regulations, policies, and procedures of the Secretary, and any superseding legislation. Final determination of the United States' share will be based upon the final audit of the total amount of allowable project costs and settlement will be made for any upward or downward adjustments to the Federal share of costs.

5. Completing the Project Without Delay and in Conformance with Requirements. The Sponsor must carry out and complete the project without undue delays and in accordance with this Agreement, 49 U.S.C. Chapters 4 71 and 475, and the regulations, policies, and procedures of the Secretary of Transportation ("Secretary"). Per 2 CFR § 200.308, the Sponsor agrees to report to the FAA any disengagement from performing the project that exceeds three months or a 25 percent reduction in time devoted to the project, and request prior approval from FAA. The report must include a reason for the project stoppage. The Sponsor also agrees to comply with the grant assurances, which are part of this Agreement.

6. Amendments or Withdrawals before Grant Acceptance. The FAA reserves the right to amend or withdraw this offer at any time prior to its acceptance by the Sponsor.

7. Offer Expiration Date. This offer will expire and the United States will not be obligated to pay any part of the costs of the project unless this offer has been accepted by the Sponsor on or before August 6, 2021, or such subsequent date as may be prescribed in writing by the FAA.

8. Improper Use of Federal Funds. The Sponsor must take all steps, including litigation if necessary, to recover Federal funds spent fraudulently, wastefully, or in violation of Federal antitrust statutes, or misused in any other manner for any project upon which Federal funds have been expended. For the purposes of this Grant Agreement, the term "Federal funds" means funds however used or dispersed by the Sponsor, that were originally paid pursuant to this or any other Federal grant agreement. The Sponsor must obtain the approval of the Secretary as to any determination of the amount of the Federal share of such funds. The Sponsor must return the recovered Federal share, including funds recovered by settlement, order, or judgment, to the Secretary. The Sponsor must furnish to the Secretary, upon request, all documents and records pertaining to the determination of the amount of the Federal share or to any settlement, litigation, negotiation, or other efforts taken to recover such funds. All settlements or other final positions of the Sponsor, in court or otherwise, involving the recovery of such Federal share require advance approval by the Secretary.

9. United States Not Liable for Damage or Injury. The United States is not responsible or liable for damage to property or injury to persons which may arise from, or be incident to, compliance with this Grant Agreement.

10. System for Award Management (SAM) Registration and Unique Entity Identifier (UEI). a. Requirement for System for Award Management (SAM): Unless the Sponsor is exempted from this requirement under 2 CFR 25.110, the Sponsor must maintain the currency of its information in the SAM until the Sponsor submits the final financial report required under this Grant, or receives the final payment, whichever is later. This requires that the Sponsor review and update the information at least annually after the initial registration and more frequently if

3 3-16-0023-031-2021

required by changes in information or another award term. Additional information about registration procedures may be found at the SAM website (currently at http://www.sam.gov). b. Unique entity identifier (UEI) means a 12-character alpha-numeric value used to identify a specific commercial, nonprofit or governmental entity. A UEI may be obtained from SAM.gov at https://sam.gov/SAM/pages/public/index.jsf.

11. Electronic Grant Payment(s). Unless otherwise directed by the FAA, the Sponsor must make each payment request under this Agreement electronically via the Delphi elnvoicing System for Department of Transportation (DOT) Financial Assistance Awardees.

12. Informal Letter Amendment of AIP Projects. If, during the life of the project, the FAA determines that the maximum grant obligation of the United States exceeds the expected needs of the Sponsor by $25,000 or five percent (5%), whichever is greater, the FAA can issue a letter amendment to the Sponsor unilaterally reducing the maximum obligation.

The FAA can also issue a letter to the Sponsor increasing the maximum obligation if there is an overrun in the total actual eligible and allowable project costs to cover the amount of the overrun provided it will not exceed the statutory limitations for grant amendments. The FAA's authority to increase the maximum obligation does not apply to the "planning" component of Condition No. 1.

The FAA can also issue an informal letter amendment that modifies the grant description to correct administrative errors or to delete work items if the FAA finds it advantageous and in the best interests of the United States.

An informal letter amendment has the same force and effect as a formal grant amendment.

13. Air and Water Quality. The Sponsor is required to comply with all applicable air and water quality standards for all projects in this grant. If the Sponsor fails to comply with this requirement, the FAA may suspend, cancel, or terminate this Grant Agreement.

14. Financial Reporting and Payment Requirements. The Sponsor will comply with all Federal financial reporting requirements and payment requirements, including submittal of timely and accurate reports.

15. Buy American. Unless otherwise approved in advance by the FAA, in accordance with 49 U.S.C. § 50101, the Sponsor will not acquire or permit any contractor or subcontractor to acquire any steel or manufactured products produced outside the United States to be used for any project for which funds are provided under this grant. The Sponsor will include a provision implementing Buy American in every contract and subcontract awarded under this Grant.

16. Maximum Obligation Increase. In accordance with 49 U.S.C. § 47108(b)(3), as amended, the maximum obligation of the United States, as stated in Condition No. 1 of this Grant Offer: a. May not be increased for a planning project; b. May be increased by not more than 15 percent for development projects if funds are available; c. May be increased by not more than the greater of the following for a, land project, if funds are available: 1. 15 percent; or 2. 25 percent of the total increase in allowable project costs attributable to acquiring an interest in the land.

4 3-16-0023-031-2021

If the sponsor requests an increase, any eligible increase in funding will be subject to the United States Government share as provided in 49 U.S.C. § 47110, or other superseding legislation if applicable, for the fiscal year appropriation with which the increase is funded. The FAA is not responsible for the same Federal share provided herein for any amount increased over the initial grant amount. The FAA may adjust the Federal share as applicable through an informal letter of amendment. 17. Audits for Sponsors. PUBLIC SPONSORS. The Sponsor must provide for a Single Audit or program-specific audit in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200. The Sponsor must submit the audit reporting package to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse on the Federal Audit Clearinghouse's Internet Data Entry System at http://harvester.census.gov/facweb/. Upon request of the FAA, the Sponsor shall provide one copy of the completed audit to the FAA.

18. Suspension or Debarment. When entering into a "covered transaction" as defined by 2 CFR § 180.200, the Sponsor must: a. Verify the non-Federal entity is eligible to participate in this Federal program by: 1. Checking the excluded parties list system (EPLS) as maintained within the System for Award Management (SAM) to determine if the non-Federal entity is excluded or disqualified; or 2. Collecting a certification statement from the non-Federal entity attesting they are not excluded or disqualified from participating; or 3. Adding a clause or condition to covered transactions attesting individual or firm are not excluded or disqualified from participating.

b. Require prime contractors to comply with 2 CFR § 180.330 when entering into lower-tier transactions (e.g. Sub-contracts). c. Immediately disclose to the FAA whenever the Sponsor (1) learns they have entered into a covered transaction with an ineligible entity or (2) suspends or debars a contractor, person, or entity. 19. Ban on Texting While Driving. a. In accordance with Executive Order 13513, Federal Leadership on Reducing Text Messaging While Driving, October 1, 2009, and DOT Order 3902.10, Text Messaging While Driving, December 30, 2009, the Sponsor is encouraged to: 1. Adopt and enforce workplace safety policies to decrease crashes caused by distracted drivers including policies to ban text messaging while driving when performing any work for, or on behalf of, the Federal government, including work relating to a grant or subgrant. 2. Conduct workplace safety initiatives in a manner commensurate with the size of the business, such as: a. Establishment of new rules and programs or re-evaluation of existing programs to prohibit text messaging while driving; and

b. Education, awareness, and other outreach to employees about the safety risks associated with texting while driving.

5 3-16-0023-031-2021

b. The Sponsor must insert the substance of this clause on banning texting while driving in all subgrants, contracts, and subcontracts funded with this Grant.

20. Trafficking in Persons. a. You as the recipient, your employees, subrecipients under this Grant, and subrecipients' employees may not- 1. Engage in severe forms of trafficking in persons during the period of time that the Grant and applicable conditions are in effect; 2. Procure a commercial sex act during the period of time that the Grant and applicable conditions are in effect; or 3. Use forced labor in the performance of the Grant or any subgrants under this Grant.

b. We as the Federal awarding agency, may unilaterally terminate this Grant, without penalty, if you or a subrecipient that is a private entity- 1. Is determined to have violated a prohibition in paragraph a. of this condition; or

2. Has an employee who is determined by the agency official authorized to terminate the Grant to have violated a prohibition in paragraph a. of this condition through conduct that is either-

a. Associated with performance under this Grant; or b. Imputed to the subrecipient using the standards and due process for imputing the conduct of an individual to an organization that are provided in 2 CFR Part 180, "OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Government-wide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement)," as implemented by our agency at 49 CFR Part 29.

c. You must inform us immediately of any information you receive from any source alleging a violation of a prohibition in paragraph a. of this condition.

d. Our right to terminate unilaterally that is described in paragraph a. of this condition: i. Implements section 106(g) of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 (TVPA), as amended (22 U.S.C. 7104(g)), and ii. Is in addition to all other remedies for noncompliance that are available to us under this Grant Agreement. 21. Exhibit "A" Property Map. The Exhibit "A" Property Map dated December 2007, is incorporated herein by reference or is submitted with the project application and made part of this Grant Agreement.

22. Employee Protection from Reprisal. a. Prohibition of Reprisals -

1. In accordance with 41 U.S.C. § 4712, an employee of a Sponsor, grantee, subgrantee, contractor, or subcontractor may not be discharged, demoted, or otherwise discriminated against as a reprisal for disclosing to a person or body described in sub-paragraph a.2. below, information that the employee reasonably believes is evidence of: i. Gross mismanagement of a Federal grant; ii. Gross waste of Federal funds; iii. An abuse of authority relating to implementation or use of Federal funds;

6 3-16-0023-031-2021

iv. A substantial and specific danger to public health or safety; or v. A violation of law, rule, or regulation related to a Federal grant. 2. Persons and bodies covered. The persons and bodies to which a disclosure by an employee is covered are as follows: i. A member of Congress or a representative of a committee of Congress; ii. An Inspector General; iii. The Government Accountability Office; iv. A Federal employee responsible for contract or grant oversight or management at the relevant agency; v. A court or grand jury; vi. A management official or other employee of the Sponsor, contractor, or subcontractor who has the responsibility to investigate, discover, or address misconduct; or vii. An authorized official of the Department of Justice or other law enforcement agency.

3. Submission of Complaint - A person who believes that they have been subjected to a reprisal prohibited by paragraph a of this grant term may submit a complaint regarding the reprisal to the Office of Inspector General (OIG) for the U.S. Department of Transportation. 4. Time Limitation for Submittal of a Complaint -A complaint may not be brought under this condition more than three years after the date on which the alleged reprisal took place. 5. Required Actions of the Inspector General - Actions, limitations, and exceptions of the Inspector General's office are established under 41 U.S.C. § 4712(b). 6. Assumption of Rights to Civil Remedy - Upon receipt of an explanation of a decision not to conduct or continue an investigation by the Office of Inspector General, the person submitting a complaint assumes the right to a civil remedy under 41 U.S.C. § 4712(c).

SPECIAL CONDITIONS

23. Plans and Specifications Approval Based Upon Certification. The FAA and the Sponsor agree that the FAA's approval ofthe Sponsor's Plans and Specification is based primarily upon the Sponsor's certification to carry out the project in accordance with policies, standards, and specifications approved by the FAA. The Sponsor understands that:

a. The Sponsor's certification does not relieve the Sponsor of the requirement to obtain prior FAA approval for modifications to any AIP standards or to notify the FAA of any limitations to competition within the project; b. The FAA's acceptance of a Sponsor's certification does not limit the FAA from reviewing appropriate project documentation for the purpose of validating the certification statements; and c. If the FAA determines that the Sponsor has not complied with their certification statements, the FAA will review the associated project costs to determine whether such costs are allowable under this Grant. 24. Design Grant. This Grant Agreement is being issued in order to complete the design of the project. The Sponsor understands and agrees that within 2 years after the design is completed that the Sponsor will accept, subject to the availability of the amount of Federal funding identified in the Airport Capital Improvement Plan (ACIP), a grant to complete the construction of the project in

7 3-16-0023-031-2021

order to provide a useful and useable unit of work. The Sponsor also understands that if the FAA has provided Federal funding to complete the design for the project, and the Sponsor has not completed the design within four (4) years from the execution of this Grant Agreement, the FAA may suspend or terminate grants related to the design. 25. Buy American Executive Orders. The Sponsor agrees to abide by applicable Executive Orders in effect at the time this Grant Agreement is executed, including Executive Order 14005, Ensuring the Future Is Made in All of America by All of America's Workers.

8 3-16-0023-031-2021

The Sponsor's acceptance of this Offer and ratification and adoption of the Project Application incorporated herein shall be evidenced by execution of this instrument by the Sponsor, as hereinafter provided, and this Offer and Acceptance shall comprise a Grant Agreement, constituting the contractual obligations and rights of the United States and the Sponsor with respect to the accomplishment of the Project and compliance with the Grant Assurances, terms, and conditions as provided herein. Such Grant Agreement shall become effective upon the Sponsor's acceptance of this Offer.

Please read the following information: By signing this document, you are agreeing that you have reviewed the following consumer disclosure information and consent to transact business using electronic communications, to receive notices and disclosures electronically, and to utilize electronic signatures in lieu of using paper documents. You are not required to receive notices and disclosures or sign documents electronically. If you prefer not to do so, you may request to receive paper copies and withdraw your consent at any time. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION ~~ {Signature)

Steve L. Engebrecht

(Typed Name)

Acting Manager, Helena ADO

(Title of FAA Official)

1 Knowingly and willfully providing false information to the Federal government is a violation of 18 U.S.C. Section 1001 (False Statements) and could subject you to fines, imprisonment, or both.

9 3-16-0023-031-2021

Part II - Acceptance

The Sponsor does hereby ratify and adopt all assurances, statements, representations, warranties, covenants, and agreements contained in the Project Application and incorporated materials referred to in the foregoing Offer, and does hereby accept this Offer and by such acceptance agrees to comply with all of the Grant Assurances, terms, and conditions in this Offer and in the Project Application.

Dated

City of McCall {Name of Sponsor)

(Signature of Sponsor's Authorized Official)

By: (Typed Name of Sponsor's Authorized Official) Title: (Title of Sponsor's Authorized Official)

2 Knowingly and willfully providing false information to the Federal government is a violation of 18 U.S.C. Section 1001 (False Statements) and could subject you to fines, imprisonment, or both.

10 3-16-0023-031-2021

CERTIFICATE OF SPONSOR'S ATTORNEY

I, , acting as Attorney for the Sponsor do hereby certify:

That in my opinion the Sponsor is empowered to enter into the foregoing Grant Agreement under the laws of the State of Idaho . Further, I have examined the foregoing Grant Agreement and the actions taken by said Sponsor and Sponsor's official representative, who has been duly authorized to execute this Grant Agreement, which is in all respects due and proper and in accordance with the laws of the said State, the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018 (Public Law Number 115-254); Title 49 U.S.C., Chapters 471 and 475; 49 U.S.C. §§ 40101, et seq., and 48103; and the Department ofTransportation Appropriations Act, 2021 (Public Law 116-260, Division L), as further amended by the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (Public Law 117-2). In addition, for grants involving projects to be carried out on property not owned by the Sponsor, there are no legal impediments that will prevent full performance by the Sponsor. Further, it is my opinion that the said Grant Agreement constitutes a legal and binding obligation of the Sponsor in accordance with the terms thereof.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 3

Dated at

By: ------(Signature of Sponsor's Attorney)

11 3-16-0023-031-2021

ASSURANCES AIRPORT SPONSORS

A. General. a. These assurances shall be complied with in the performance of grant agreements for airport development, airport planning, and noise compatibility program grants for airport sponsors. b. These assurances are required to be submitted as part of the project application by sponsors requesting funds under the provisions ofTitle 49, U.S.C., subtitle VII, as amended. As used herein, the term "public agency sponsor" means a public agency with control of a public-use airport; the term "private sponsor" means a private owner of a public-use airport; and the term "sponsor" includes both public agency sponsors and private sponsors.

c. Upon acceptance of this grant offer by the sponsor, these assurances are incorporated in and become part of this grant agreement.

B. Duration and Applicability.

1. Airport development or Noise Compatibility Program Projects Undertaken by a Public Agency Sponsor. The terms, conditions and assurances of this grant agreement shall remain in full force and effect throughout the useful life of the facilities developed or equipment acquired for an airport development or noise compatibility program project, or throughout the useful life of the project items installed within a facility under a noise compatibility program project, but in any event not to exceed twenty (20) years from the date of acceptance of a grant offer of Federal funds for the project. However, there shall be no limit on the duration of the assurances regarding Exclusive Rights and Airport Revenue so long as the airport is used as an airport. There shall be no limit on the duration of the terms, conditions, and assurances with respect to real property acquired with federal funds. Furthermore, the duration of the Civil Rights assurance shall be specified in the assurances.

2. Airport Development or Noise Compatibility Projects Undertaken by a Private Sponsor.

The preceding paragraph 1 also applies to a private sponsor except that the useful life of project items installed within a facility or the useful life of the facilities developed or equipment acquired under an airport development or noise compatibility program project shall be no less than ten (10) years from the date of acceptance of Federal aid for the project.

3. Airport Planning Undertaken by a Sponsor. Unless otherwise specified in this grant agreement, only Assurances 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 13, 18, 25, 30, 32, 33, and 34 in Section C apply to planning projects. The terms, conditions, and assurances of this grant agreement shall remain in full force and effect during the life of the project; there shall be no limit on the duration of the assurances regarding Exclusive Rights and Airport Revenue so long as the airport is used as an airport.

C. Sponsor Certification. The sponsor hereby assures and certifies, with respect to this grant that:

Airport Sponsor Assurances 2/2020 Page 1 of 18 3-16-0023-031-2021

1. General Federal Requirements

It will comply with all applicable Federal laws, regulations, executive orders, policies, guidelines, and requirements as they relate to the application, acceptance and use of Federal funds for this project including but not limited to the following:

FEDERAL LEGISLATION

a. Title 49, U.S.C., subtitle VII, as amended.

b. Davis-Bacon Act - 40 U.S.C. 276(a), et seq. 1 c. Federal Fair Labor Standards Act - 29 U.S.C. 201, et seq.

d. Hatch Act - 5 U.S.C. 1501, et seq. 2 e. Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 Title 42 U.S.C. 4601, et seq. 1 2 f. National Historic Preservation Act of 1966- Section 106 - 16 U.S.C. 470(f). 1 g. Archeological and Historic Preservation Act of 1974 -16 U.S.C. 469 through 469c. 1

h. Native Americans Grave Repatriation Act - 25 U.S.C. Section 3001, et seq.

i. Clean Air Act, P.L. 90-148, as amended. j. Coastal Zone Management Act, P.L. 93-205, as amended.

k. Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 - Section 102(a) - 42 U.S.C. 4012a. 1 I. Title 49, U.S.C., Section 303, (formerly known as Section 4(f))

m. Rehabilitation Act of 1973 - 29 U.S.C. 794.

n. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq., 78 stat. 252) (prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin);

o. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended, (42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.), prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability). p. Age Discrimination Act of 1975 - 42 U.S.C. 6101, et seq.

q. American Indian Religious Freedom Act, P.L. 95-341, as amended.

r. Architectural Barriers Act of 1968 -42 U.S.C. 4151, et seq. 1 s. Power plant and Industrial Fuel Use Act of 1978 - Section 403- 2 U.S.C. 8373. 1 t. Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act - 40 U.S.C. 327, et seq. 1

u. Copeland Anti-kickback Act - 18 U.S.C. 874. 1 v. National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 - 42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq. 1 w. Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, P.L. 90-542, as amended. x. Single Audit Act of 1984 - 31 U.S.C. 7501, et seq. 2 y. Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 - 41 U.S.C. 702 through 706. z. The Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006, as amended (Pub. L. 109-282, as amended by section 6202 of Pub. L. 110-252).

Airport Sponsor Assurances 2/2020 Page 2 of 18 3-16-0023-031-2021

EXECUTIVE ORDERS a. Executive Order 11246 - Equal Employment Opportunity1 b. Executive Order 11990 - Protection of Wetlands

c. Executive Order 11998 - Flood Plain Management

d. Executive Order 12372 - Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs e. Executive Order 12699 - Seismic Safety of Federal and Federally Assisted New Building Construction1 f. Executive Order 12898 - Environmental Justice

FEDERAL REGULATIONS

a. 2 CFR Part 180 - 0MB Guidelines to Agencies on Government-wide Debarment and Suspension (Non-procurement).

b. 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. [0MB Circular A-87 Cost Principles Applicable to Grants and Contracts with State and Local Governments, and 0MB Circular A-133 - Audits of States, Local Governments, 4 5 6 and Non-Profit Organizations]. • • c. 2 CFR Part 1200 - Non-procurement Suspension and Debarment. d. 14 CFR Part 13 - Investigative and Enforcement Procedures

e. 14 CFR Part 16 - Rules of Practice For Federally Assisted Airport Enforcement Proceedings. f. 14 CFR Part 150 -Airport noise compatibility planning.

g. 28 CFR Part 35 - Discrimination on the Basis of Disability in State and Local Government Services.

h. 28 CFR § 50.3 - U.S. Department of Justice Guidelines for Enforcement of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. i. 29 CFR Part 1- Procedures for predetermination of wage rates. 1 j. 29 CFR Part 3 - Contractors and subcontractors on public building or public work financed in whole or part by loans or grants from the United States. 1

k. 29 CFR Part 5 - Labor standards provisions applicable to contracts covering federally financed and assisted construction (also labor standards provisions applicable to non-construction contracts subject to the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act). 1 I. 41 CFR Part 60 - Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, Equal Employment Opportunity, Department of Labor (Federal and federally assisted contracting requirements). 1 m. 49 CFR Part 18 - Uniform administrative requirements for grants and cooperative agreements to state and local governments. 3 n. 49 CFR Part 20 - New restrictions on lobbying. o. 49 CFR Part 21- Nondiscrimination in federally-assisted programs of the Department of Transportation - effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. p. 49 CFR Part 23 - Participation by Disadvantage Business Enterprise in Airport Concessions.

Airport Sponsor Assurances 2/2020 Page 3 of 18 3-16-0023-031-2021

q. 49 CFR Part 24 - Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition for Federal and Federally Assisted Programs.12

r. 49 CFR Part 26 - Participation by Disadvantaged Business Enterprises in Department of Transportation Programs. s. 49 CFR Part 27 - Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Handicap in Programs and Activities Receiving or Benefiting from Federal Financial Assistance. 1 t. 49 CFR Part 28 - Enforcement of Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Handicap in Programs or Activities conducted by the Department of Transportation.

u. 49 CFR Part 30 - Denial of public works contracts to suppliers of goods and services of countries that deny procurement market access to U.S. contractors. v. 49 CFR Part 32 - Government-wide Requirements for Drug-Free Workplace (Financial Assistance). w. 49 CFR Part 37 - Transportation Services for Individuals with Disabilities (ADA).

x. 49 CFR Part 41- Seismic safety of Federal and federally assisted or regulated new building construction.

SPECIFIC ASSURANCES Specific assurances required to be included in grant agreements by any of the above laws, regulations or circulars are incorporated by reference in this grant agreement.

FOOTNOTES TO ASSURANCE C.1. 1 These laws do not apply to airport planning sponsors. 2 These laws do not apply to private sponsors. 3 49 CFR Part 18 and 2 CFR Part 200 contain requirements for State and Local Governments receiving Federal assistance. Any requirement levied upon State and Local Governments by this regulation and circular shall also be applicable to private sponsors receiving Federal assistance under Title 49, United States Code. 4 On December 26, 2013 at 78 FR 78590, the Office of Management and Budget (0MB) issued the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards in 2 CFR Part 200. 2 CFR Part 200 replaces and combines the former Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants (0MB Circular A-102 and Circular A-110 or 2 CFR Part 215 or Circular) as well as the Cost Principles (Circulars A-21 or 2 CFR part 220; Circular A-87 or 2 CFR part 225; and A-122, 2 CFR part 230). Additionally it replaces Circular A-133 guidance on the Single Annual Audit. In accordance with 2 CFR section 200.110, the standards set forth in Part 200 which affect administration of Federal awards issued by Federal agencies become effective once implemented by Federal agencies or when any future amendment to this Part becomes final. Federal agencies, including the Department of Transportation, must implement the policies and procedures applicable to Federal awards by promulgating a regulation to be effective by December 26, 2014 unless different provisions are required by statute or approved byOMB. 5 Cost principles established in 2 CFR part 200 subpart E must be used as guidelines for determining the eligibility of specific types of expenses. 6 Audit requirements established in 2 CFR part 200 subpart Fare the guidelines for audits.

Airport Sponsor Assurances 2/2020 Page 4 of 18 3-16-0023-031-2021

2. Responsibility and Authority of the Sponsor.

a. Public Agency Sponsor: It has legal authority to apply for this grant, and to finance and carry out the proposed project; that a resolution, motion or similar action has been duly adopted or passed as an official act of the applicant's governing body authorizing the filing of the application, including all understandings and assurances contained therein, and directing and authorizing the person identified as the official representative of the applicant to act in connection with the application and to provide such additional information as may be required.

b. Private Sponsor: It has legal authority to apply for this grant and to finance and carry out the proposed project and comply with all terms, conditions, and assurances of this grant agreement. It shall designate an official representative and shall in writing direct and authorize that person to file this application, including all understandings and assurances contained therein; to act in connection with this application; and to provide such additional information as may be required.

3. Sponsor Fund Availability. It has sufficient funds available for that portion of the project costs which are not to be paid by the United States. It has sufficient funds available to assure operation and maintenance of items funded under this grant agreement which it will own or control.

4. Good Title. a. It, a public agency or the Federal government, holds good title, satisfactory to the Secretary, to the landing area of the airport or site thereof, or will give assurance satisfactory to the Secretary that good title will be acquired.

b. For noise compatibility program projects to be carried out on the property of the sponsor, it holds good title satisfactory to the Secretary to that portion of the property upon which Federal funds will be expended or will give assurance to the Secretary that good title will be obtained.

5. Preserving Rights and Powers. a. It will not take or permit any action which would operate to deprive it of any of the rights and powers necessary to perform any or all of the terms, conditions, and assurances in this grant agreement without the written approval of the Secretary, and will act promptly to acquire, extinguish or modify any outstanding rights or claims of right of others which would interfere with such performance by the sponsor. This shall be done in a manner acceptable to the Secretary. b. Subject to the FAA Act of 2018, Public Law 115-254, Section 163, it will not sell, lease, encumber, or otherwise transfer or dispose of any part of its title or other interests in the property shown on Exhibit A to this application or, for a noise compatibility program project, that portion of the property upon which Federal funds have been expended, for the duration of the terms, conditions, and assurances in this grant agreement without approval by the Secretary. If the transferee is found by the Secretary to be eligible under Title 49, United States Code, to assume the obligations of this grant agreement and to have the power, authority, and financial resources to carry out all such obligations, the sponsor shall insert in the contract or

Airport Sponsor Assurances 2/2020 Page 5 of 18 3-16-0023-031-2021

document transferring or disposing of the sponsor's interest, and make binding upon the transferee all of the terms, conditions, and assurances contained in this grant agreement.

c. For all noise compatibility program projects which are to be carried out by another unit of local government or are on property owned by a unit of local government other than the sponsor, it will enter into an agreement with that government. Except as otherwise specified by the Secretary, that agreement shall obligate that government to the same terms, conditions, and assurances that would be applicable to it if it applied directly to the FAA for a grant to undertake the noise compatibility program project. That agreement and changes thereto must be satisfactory to the Secretary. It will take steps to enforce this agreement against the local government if there is substantial non-compliance with the terms of the agreement.

d. For noise compatibility program projects to be carried out on privately owned property, it will enter into an agreement with the owner of that property which includes provisions specified by the Secretary. It will take steps to enforce this agreement against the property owner whenever there is substantial non-compliance with the terms of the agreement. e. If the sponsor is a private sponsor, it will take steps satisfactory to the Secretary to ensure that the airport will continue to function as a public-use airport in accordance with these assurances for the duration of these assurances.

f. If an arrangement is made for management and operation of the airport by any agency or person other than the sponsor or an employee of the sponsor, the sponsor will reserve sufficient rights and authority to insure that the airport will be operated and maintained in accordance Title 49, United States Code, the regulations and the terms, conditions and assurances in this grant agreement and shall insure that such arrangement also requires compliance therewith.

g. Sponsors of commercial service airports will not permit or enter into any arrangement that results in permission for the owner or tenant of a property used as a residence, or zoned for residential use, to taxi an aircraft between that property and any location on airport. Sponsors of general aviation airports entering into any arrangement that results in permission for the owner of residential real property adjacent to or near the airport must comply with the requirements of Sec. 136 of Public Law 112-95 and the sponsor assurances.

6. Consistency with Local Plans. The project is reasonably consistent with plans (existing at the time of submission of this application) of public agencies that are authorized by the State in which the project is located to plan for the development of the area surrounding the airport.

7. Consideration of Local Interest. It has given fair consideration to the interest of communities in or near where the project may be located.

8. Consultation with Users.

In making a decision to undertake any airport development project under Title 49, United States Code, it has undertaken reasonable consultations with affected parties using the airport at which project is proposed.

Airport Sponsor Assurances 2/2020 Page 6 of 18 3-16-0023-031-2021

9. Public Hearings. In projects involving the location of an airport, an airport runway, or a major runway extension, it has afforded the opportunity for public hearings for the purpose of considering the economic, social, and environmental effects of the airport or runway location and its consistency with goals and objectives of such planning as has been carried out by the community and it shall, when requested by the Secretary, submit a copy of the transcript of such hearings to the Secretary. Further, for such projects, it has on its management board either voting representation from the communities where the project is located or has advised the communities that they have the right to petition the Secretary concerning a proposed project.

10. Metropolitan Planning Organization.

In projects involving the location of an airport, an airport runway, or a major runway extension at a medium or large hub airport, the sponsor has made available to and has provided upon request to the metropolitan planning organization in the area in which the airport is located, if any, a copy of the proposed amendment to the airport layout plan to depict the project and a copy of any airport master plan in which the project is described or depicted.

11. Pavement Preventive Maintenance.

With respect to a project approved after January 1, 1995, for the replacement or reconstruction of pavement at the airport, it assures or certifies that it has implemented an effective airport pavement maintenance-management program and it assures that it will use such program for the useful life of any pavement constructed, reconstructed or repaired with Federal financial assistance at the airport. It will provide such reports on pavement condition and pavement management programs as the Secretary determines may be useful.

12. Terminal Development Prerequisites.

For projects which include terminal development at a public use airport, as defined in Title 49, it has, on the date of submittal of the project grant application, all the safety equipment required for certification of such airport under section 44706 of Title 49, United States Code, and all the security equipment required by rule or regulation, and has provided for access to the passenger enplaning and deplaning area of such airport to passengers enplaning and deplaning from aircraft other than air carrier aircraft.

13. Accounting System, Audit, and Record Keeping Requirements.

a. It shall keep all project accounts and records which fully disclose the amount and disposition by the recipient of the proceeds of this grant, the total cost of the project in connection with which this grant is given or used, and the amount or nature of that portion of the cost of the project supplied by other sources, and such other financial records pertinent to the project. The accounts and records shall be kept in accordance with an accounting system that will facilitate an effective audit in accordance with the Single Audit Act of 1984. b. It shall make available to the Secretary and the Comptroller General of the United States, or any of their duly authorized representatives, for the purpose of audit and examination, any books, documents, papers, and records of the recipient that are pertinent to this grant. The Secretary may require that an appropriate audit be conducted by a recipient. In any case in which an independent audit is made of the accounts of a sponsor relating to the disposition of the proceeds of a grant or relating to the project in connection with which this grant was given or used, it shall file a certified copy of such audit with the Comptroller General of the United

Airport Sponsor Assurances 2/2020 Page 7 of 18

( 3-16-0023-031-2021

States not later than six (6) months following the close of the fiscal year for which the audit was made.

14. Minimum Wage Rates.

It shall include, in all contracts in excess of $2,000 for work on any projects funded under this grant agreement which involve labor, provisions establishing minimum rates of wages, to be predetermined by the Secretary of Labor, in accordance with the Davis-Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 276a-276a-S), which contractors shall pay to skilled and unskilled labor, and such minimum rates shall be stated in the invitation for bids and shall be included in proposals or bids for the work.

15. Veteran's Preference.

It shall include in all contracts for work on any project funded under this grant agreement which involve labor, such provisions as are necessary to insure that, in the employment of labor (except in executive, administrative, and supervisory positions), preference shall be given to Vietnam era veterans, Persian Gulf veterans, Afghanistan-Iraq war veterans, disabled veterans, and small business concerns owned and controlled by disabled veterans as defined in Section 47112 of Title 49, United States Code. However, this preference shall apply only where the individuals are available and qualified to perform the work to which the employment relates.

16. Conformity to Plans and Specifications.

It will execute the project subject to plans, specifications, and schedules approved by the Secretary. Such plans, specifications, and schedules shall be submitted to the Secretary prior to commencement of site preparation, construction, or other performance under this grant agreement, and, upon approval of the Secretary, shall be incorporated into this grant agreement. Any modification to the approved plans, specifications, and schedules shall also be subject to approval of the Secretary, and incorporated into this grant agreement.

17. Construction Inspection and Approval. It will provide and maintain competent technical supervision at the construction site throughout the project to assure that the work conforms to the plans, specifications, and schedules approved by the Secretary for the project. It shall subject the construction work on any project contained in an approved project application to inspection and approval by the Secretary and such work shall be in accordance with regulations and procedures prescribed by the Secretary. Such regulations and procedures shall require such cost and progress reporting by the sponsor or sponsors of such project as the Secretary shall deem necessary.

18. Planning Projects. In carrying out planning projects: a. It will execute the project in accordance with the approved program narrative contained in the project application or with the modifications similarly approved. b. It will furnish the Secretary with such periodic reports as required pertaining to the planning project and planning work activities. c. It will include in all published material prepared in connection with the planning project a notice that the material was prepared under a grant provided by the United States. d. It will make such material available for examination by the public, and agrees that no material prepared with funds under this project shall be subject to copyright in the United States or any other country.

Airport Sponsor Assurances 2/2020 Page 8 of 18 3-16-0023-031-2021

e. It will give the Secretary unrestricted authority to publish, disclose, distribute, and otherwise use any of the material prepared in connection with this grant.

f. It will grant the Secretary the right to disapprove the sponsor's employment of specific consultants and their subcontractors to do all or any part of this project as well as the right to disapprove the proposed scope and cost of professional services. g. It will grant the Secretary the right to disapprove the use of the sponsor's employees to do all or any part of the project. h. It understands and agrees that the Secretary's approval of this project grant or the Secretary's approval of any planning material developed as part of this grant does not constitute or imply any assurance or commitment on the part of the Secretary to approve any pending or future application for a Federal airport grant.

19. Operation and Maintenance.

a. The airport and all facilities which are necessary to serve the aeronautical users of the airport, other than facilities owned or controlled by the United States, shall be operated at all times in a safe and serviceable condition and in accordance with the minimum standards as may be required or prescribed by applicable Federal, state and local agencies for maintenance and operation. It will not cause or permit any activity or action thereon which would interfere with its use for airport purposes. It will suitably operate and maintain the airport and all facilities thereon or connected therewith, with due regard to climatic and flood conditions. Any proposal to temporarily close the airport for non-aeronautical purposes must first be approved by the Secretary. In furtherance of this assurance, the sponsor will have in effect arrangements for- 1. Operating the airport's aeronautical facilities whenever required;

2. Promptly marking and lighting hazards resulting from airport conditions, including temporary conditions; and 3. Promptly notifying airmen of any condition affecting aeronautical use of the airport. Nothing contained herein shall be construed to require that the airport be operated for aeronautical use during temporary periods when snow, flood or other climatic conditions interfere with such operation and maintenance. Further, nothing herein shall be construed as requiring the maintenance, repair, restoration, or replacement of any structure or facility which is substantially damaged or destroyed due to an act of God or other condition or circumstance beyond the control of the sponsor.

b. It will suitably operate and maintain noise compatibility program items that it owns or controls upon which Federal funds have been expended.

20. Hazard Removal and Mitigation. It will take appropriate action to assure that such terminal airspace as is required to protect instrument and visual operations to the airport (including established minimum flight altitudes) will be adequately cleared and protected by removing, lowering, relocating, marking, or lighting or otherwise mitigating existing airport hazards and by preventing the establishment or creation of future airport hazards.

21. Compatible Land Use. It will take appropriate action, to the extent reasonable, including the adoption of zoning laws, to restrict the use of land adjacent to or in the immediate vicinity of the airport to activities and

Airport Sponsor Assurances 2/2020 Page 9 of 18 3-16-0023-031-2021

purposes compatible with normal airport operations, including landing and takeoff of aircraft. In addition, if the project is for noise compatibility program implementation, it will not cause or permit any change in land use, within its jurisdiction, that will reduce its compatibility, with respect to the airport, of the noise compatibility program measures upon which Federal funds have been expended. 22. Economic Nondiscrimination. a. It will make the airport available as an airport for public use on reasonable terms and without unjust discrimination to all types, kinds and classes of aeronautical activities, including commercial aeronautical activities offering services to the public at the airport. b. In any agreement, contract, lease, or other arrangement under which a right or privilege at the airport is granted to any person, firm, or corporation to conduct or to engage in any aeronautical activity for furnishing services to the public at the airport, the sponsor will insert and enforce provisions requiring the contractor to- 1) furnish said services on a reasonable, and not unjustly discriminatory, basis to all users thereof, and 2) charge reasonable, and not unjustly discriminatory, prices for each unit or service, provided that the contractor may be allowed to make reasonable and nondiscriminatory discounts, rebates, or other similar types of price reductions to volume purchasers. c. Each fixed-based operator at the airport shall be subject to the same rates, fees, rentals, and other charges as are uniformly applicable to all other fixed-based operators making the same or similar uses of such airport and utilizing the same or similar facilities. d. Each air carrier using such airport shall have the right to service itself or to use any fixed-based operator that is authorized or permitted by the airport to serve any air carrier at such airport. e. Each air carrier using such airport (whether as a tenant, non-tenant, or subtenant of another air carrier tenant) shall be subject to such nondiscriminatory and substantially comparable rules, regulations, conditions, rates, fees, rentals, and other charges with respect to facilities directly and substantially related to providing air transportation as are applicable to all such air carriers which make similar use of such airport and utilize similar facilities, subject to reasonable classifications such as tenants or non-tenants and signatory carriers and non-signatory carriers. Classification or status as tenant or signatory shall not be unreasonably withheld by any airport provided an air carrier assumes obligations substantially similar to those already imposed on air carriers in such classification or status. f. It will not exercise or grant any right or privilege which operates to prevent any person, firm, or corporation operating aircraft on the airport from performing any services on its own aircraft with its own employees [including, but not limited to maintenance, repair, and fueling] that it may choose to perform. g. In the event the sponsor itself exercises any of the rights and privileges referred to in this assurance, the services involved will be provided on the same conditions as would apply to the furnishing of such services by commercial aeronautical service providers authorized by the sponsor under these provisions. h. The sponsor may establish such reasonable, and not unjustly discriminatory, conditions to be met by all users of the airport as may be necessary for the safe and efficient operation of the airport.

Airport Sponsor Assurances 2/2020 Page 10 of 18 3-16-0023-031-2021

i. The sponsor may prohibit or limit any given type, kind or class of aeronautical use of the airport if such action is necessary for the safe operation of the airport or necessary to serve the civil aviation needs of the public.

23. Exclusive Rights.

It will permit no exclusive right for the use of the airport by any person providing, or intending to provide, aeronautical services to the public. For purposes of this paragraph, the providing of the services at an airport by a single fixed-based operator shall not be construed as an exclusive right if both of the following apply:

a. It would be unreasonably costly, burdensome, or impractical for more than one fixed-based operator to provide such services, and

b. If allowing more than one fixed-based operator to provide such services would require the reduction of space leased pursuant to an existing agreement between such single fixed-based operator and such airport. It further agrees that it will not, either directly or indirectly, grant or permit any person, firm, or corporation, the exclusive right at the airport to conduct any aeronautical activities, including, but not limited to charter flights, pilot training, aircraft rental and sightseeing, aerial photography, crop dusting, aerial advertising and surveying, air carrier operations, aircraft sales and services, sale of aviation petroleum products whether or not conducted in conjunction with other aeronautical activity, repair and maintenance of aircraft, sale of aircraft parts, and any other activities which because of their direct relationship to the operation of aircraft can be regarded as an aeronautical activity, and that it will terminate any exclusive right to conduct an aeronautical activity now existing at such an airport before the grant of any assistance under Title 49, United States Code.

24. Fee and Rental Structure.

It will maintain a fee and rental structure for the facilities and services at the airport which will make the airport as self-sustaining as possible under the circumstances existing at the particular airport, taking into account such factors as the volume of traffic and economy of collection. No part of the Federal share of an airport development, airport planning or noise compatibility project for which a grant is made under Title 49, United States Code, the Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982, the Federal Airport Act or the Airport and Airway Development Act of 1970 shall be included in the rate basis in establishing fees, rates, and charges for users of that airport.

25. Airport Revenues.

a. All revenues generated by the airport and any local taxes on aviation fuel established after December 30, 1987, will be expended by it for the capital or operating costs of the airport; the local airport system; or other local facilities which are owned or operated by the owner or operator of the airport and which are directly and substantially related to the actual air transportation of passengers or property; or for noise mitigation purposes on or off the airport. The following exceptions apply to this paragraph: 1. If covenants or assurances in debt obligations issued before September 3, 1982, by the owner or operator of the airport, or provisions enacted before September 3, 1982, in governing statutes controlling the owner or operator's financing, provide for the use of the revenues from any of the airport owner or operator's facilities, including the airport, to support not only the airport but also the airport owner or operator's general debt obligations or other facilities, then this limitation on the use of all revenues generated by the airport (and, in the case of a public airport, local taxes on aviation fuel) shall not apply.

------·------Airport Sponsor Assurances 2/2020 Page 11 of 18 3-16-0023-031-2021

2. If the Secretary approves the sale of a privately owned airport to a public sponsor and provides funding for any portion of the public sponsor's acquisition of land, this limitation on the use of all revenues generated by the sale shall not apply to certain proceeds from the sale. This is conditioned on repayment to the Secretary by the private owner of an amount equal to the remaining unamortized portion (amortized over a 20-year period) of any airport improvement grant made to the private owner for any purpose other than land acquisition on or after October 1, 1996, plus an amount equal to the federal share of the current fair market value of any land acquired with an airport improvement grant made to that airport on or after October 1, 1996. 3. Certain revenue derived from or generated by mineral extraction, production, lease, or other means at a general aviation airport (as defined at Section 47102 of title 49 United States Code), if the FAA determines the airport sponsor meets the requirements set forth in Sec. 813 of Public Law 112-95. b. As part of the annual audit required under the Single Audit Act of 1984, the sponsor will direct that the audit will review, and the resulting audit report will provide an opinion concerning, the use of airport revenue and taxes in paragraph (a), and indicating whether funds paid or transferred to the owner or operator are paid or transferred in a manner consistent with Title 49, United States Code and any other applicable provision of law, including any regulation promulgated by the Secretary or Administrator. c. Any civil penalties or other sanctions will be imposed for violation of this assurance in accordance with the provisions of Section 47107 of Title 49, United States Code.

26. Reports and Inspections.

It will: a. submit to the Secretary such annual or special financial and operations reports as the Secretary may reasonably request and make such reports available to the public; make available to the public at reasonable times and places a report of the airport budget in a format prescribed by the Secretary; b. for airport development projects, make the airport and all airport records and documents affecting the airport, including deeds, leases, operation and use agreements, regulations and other instruments, available for inspection by any duly authorized agent of the Secretary upon reasonable request; c. for noise compatibility program projects, make records and documents relating to the project and continued compliance with the terms, conditions, and assurances of this grant agreement including deeds, leases, agreements, regulations, and other instruments, available for inspection by any duly authorized agent of the Secretary upon reasonable request; and d. in a format and time prescribed by the Secretary, provide to the Secretary and make available to the public following each of its fiscal years, an annual report listing in detail: 1. all amounts paid by the airport to any other unit of government and the purposes for which each such payment was made; and 2. all services and property provided by the airport to other units of government and the amount of compensation received for provision of each such service and property.

Airport Sponsor Assurances 2/2020 Page 12 of 18 3-16-0023-031-2021

27. Use by Government Aircraft.

It will make available all of the facilities of the airport developed with Federal financial assistance and all those usable for landing and takeoff of aircraft to the United States for use by Government aircraft in common with other aircraft at all times without charge, except, if the use by Government aircraft is substantial, charge may be made for a reasonable share, proportional to such use, for the cost of operating and maintaining the facilities used. Unless otherwise determined by the Secretary, or otherwise agreed to by the sponsor and the using agency, substantial use of an airport by Government aircraft will be considered to exist when operations of such aircraft are in excess of those which, in the opinion of the Secretary, would unduly interfere with use of the landing areas by other authorized aircraft, or during any calendar month that -

a. Five (5) or more Government aircraft are regularly based at the airport or on land adjacent thereto; or b. The total number of movements (counting each landing as a movement) of Government aircraft is 300 or more, or the gross accumulative weight of Government aircraft using the airport (the total movement of Government aircraft multiplied by gross weights of such aircraft) is in excess offive million pounds.

28. Land for Federal Facilities.

It will furnish without cost to the Federal Government for use in connection with any air traffic control or air navigation activities, or weather-reporting and communication activities related to air traffic control, any areas of land or water, or estate therein, or rights in buildings of the sponsor as the Secretary considers necessary or desirable for construction, operation, and maintenance at Federal expense of space or facilities for such purposes. Such areas or any portion thereof will be made available as provided herein within four months after receipt of a written request from the Secretary.

29. Airport Layout Plan. a. Subject to the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018, Public Law 115-254, Section 163, it will keep up to date at all times an airport layout plan of the airport showing:

1. boundaries of the airport and all proposed additions thereto, together with the boundaries of all offsite areas owned or controlled by the sponsor for airport purposes and proposed additions thereto; 2. the location and nature of all existing and proposed airport facilities and structures (such as runways, taxiways, aprons, terminal buildings, hangars and roads), including all proposed extensions and reductions of existing airport facilities; 3. the location of all existing and proposed non-aviation areas and of all existing improvements thereon; and 4. all proposed and existing access points used to taxi aircraft across the airport's property boundary. Such airport layout plans and each amendment, revision, or modification thereof, shall be subject to the approval of the Secretary which approval shall be evidenced by the signature of a duly authorized representative of the Secretary on the face of the airport layout plan. The sponsor will not make or permit any changes or alterations in the airport or any of its facilities which are not in conformity with the airport layout plan as approved by the Secretary and which might, in the opinion of the Secretary, adversely affect the safety, utility or efficiency of the airport.

Airport Sponsor Assurances 2/2020 Page 13 of 18 3-16-0023-031-2021

a. Subject to the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018, Public Law 115-254, Section 163, if a change or alteration in the airport or the facilities is made which the Secretary determines adversely affects the safety, utility, or efficiency of any federally owned, leased, or funded property on or off the airport and which is not in conformity with the airport layout plan as approved by the Secretary, the owner or operator will, if requested, by the Secretary (1) eliminate such adverse effect in a manner approved by the Secretary; or (2) bear all costs of relocating such property (or replacement thereof) to a site acceptable to the Secretary and all costs of restoring such property (or replacement thereof) to the level of safety, utility, efficiency, and cost of operation existing before the unapproved change in the airport or its facilities except in the case of a relocation or replacement of an existing airport facility due to a change in the Secretary's design standards beyond the control of the airport sponsor.

30. Civil Rights. It will promptly take any measures necessary to ensure that no person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, creed, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination in any activity conducted with, or benefiting from, funds received from this grant.

a. Using the definitions of activity, facility and program as found and defined in§§ 21.23 (b) and 21.23 (e) of 49 CFR § 21, the sponsor will facilitate all programs, operate all facilities, or conduct all programs in compliance with all non-discrimination requirements imposed by, or pursuant to these assurances.

b. Applicability 1. Programs and Activities. If the sponsor has received a grant (or other federal assistance) for any of the sponsor's program or activities, these requirements extend to all of the sponsor's programs and activities. 2. Facilities. Where it receives a grant or other federal financial assistance to construct, expand, renovate, remodel, alter or acquire a facility, or part of a facility, the assurance extends to the entire facility and facilities operated in connection therewith. 3. Real Property. Where the sponsor receives a grant or other Federal financial assistance in the form of, or for the acquisition of real property or an interest in real property, the assurance will extend to rights to space on, over, or under such property.

c. Duration. The sponsor agrees that it is obligated to this assurance for the period during which Federal financial assistance is extended to the program, except where the Federal financial assistance is to provide, or is in the form of, personal property, or real property, or interest therein, or structures or improvements thereon, in which case the assurance obligates the sponsor, or any transferee for the longer of the following periods: 1. So long as the airport is used as an airport, or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits; or 2. So long as the sponsor retains ownership or possession of the property.

Airport Sponsor Assurances 2/2020 Page 14 of 18 3-16-0023-031-2021

d. Required Solicitation Language. It will include the following notification in all solicitations for bids, Requests For Proposals for work, or material under this grant agreement and in all proposals for agreements, including airport concessions, regardless of funding source:

"The (City of McCall), in accordance with the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (78 Stat. 252, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000d to 2000d-4) and the Regulations, hereby notifies all bidders that it will affirmatively ensure that any contract entered into pursuant to this advertisement, disadvantaged business enterprises and airport concession disadvantaged business enterprises will be afforded full and fair opportunity to submit bids in response to this invitation and will not be discriminated against on the grounds of race, color, or national origin in consideration for an award."

e. Required Contract Provisions. l. It will insert the non-discrimination contract clauses requiring compliance with the acts and regulations relative to non-discrimination in Federally-assisted programs of the DOT, and incorporating the acts and regulations into the contracts by reference in every contract or agreement subject to the non-discrimination in Federally-assisted programs of the DOT acts and regulations. 2. It will include a list of the pertinent non-discrimination authorities in every contract that is subject to the non-discrimination acts and regulations.

3. It will insert non-discrimination contract clauses as a covenant running with the land, in any deed from the United States effecting or recording a transfer of real property, structures, use, or improvements thereon or interest therein to a sponsor. 4. It will insert non-discrimination contract clauses prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, creed, sex, age, or handicap as a covenant running with the land, in any future deeds, leases, license, permits, or similar instruments entered into by the sponsor with other parties: a. For the subsequent transfer of real property acquired or improved under the applicable activity, project, or program; and b. For the construction or use of, or access to, space on, over, or under real property acquired or improved under the applicable activity, project, or program.

f. It will provide for such methods of administration for the program as are found by the Secretary to give reasonable guarantee that it, other recipients, sub-recipients, sub-grantees, contractors, subcontractors, consultants, transferees, successors in interest, and other participants of Federal financial assistance under such program will comply with all requirements imposed or pursuant to the acts, the regulations, and this assurance. g. It agrees that the United States has a right to seek judicial enforcement with regard to any matter arising under the acts, the regulations, and this assurance.

31. Disposal of Land. a. For land purchased under a grant for airport noise compatibility purposes, including land serving as a noise buffer, it will dispose of the land, when the land is no longer needed for such purposes, at fair market value, at the earliest practicable time. That portion of the proceeds of such disposition which is proportionate to the United States' share of acquisition of such land will be, at the discretion of the Secretary, (1) reinvested in another project at the airport, or (2)

Airport Sponsor Assurances 2/2020 Page 15 of 18 3-16-0023-031-2021

transferred to another eligible airport as prescribed by the Secretary. The Secretary shall give preference to the following, in descending order, (l)reinvestment in an approved noise compatibility project, (2) reinvestment in an approved project that is eligible for grant funding under Section 47117(e) of title 49 United States Code, (3) reinvestment in an approved airport development project that is eligible for grant funding under Sections 47114, 47115, or 47117 of title 49 United States Code, (4) transferred to an eligible sponsor of another public airport to be reinvested in an approved noise compatibility project at that airport, and (5) paid to the Secretary for deposit in the Airport and Airway Trust Fund. If land acquired under a grant for noise compatibility purposes is leased at fair market value and consistent with noise buffering purposes, the lease will not be considered a disposal of the land. Revenues derived from such a lease may be used for an approved airport development project that would otherwise be eligible for grant funding or any permitted use of airport revenue. b. For land purchased under a grant for airport development purposes (other than noise compatibility), it will, when the land is no longer needed for airport purposes, dispose of such land at fair market value or make available to the Secretary an amount equal to the United States' proportionate share of the fair market value of the land. That portion of the proceeds of such disposition which is proportionate to the United States' share of the cost of acquisition of such land will, (1) upon application to the Secretary, be reinvested or transferred to another eligible airport as prescribed by the Secretary. The Secretary shall give preference to the following, in descending order: (1) reinvestment in an approved noise compatibility project, (2) reinvestment in an approved project that is eligible for grant funding under Section 47117(e) of title 49 United States Code, (3) reinvestment in an approved airport development project that is eligible for grant funding under Sections 47114, 47115, or 47117 of title 49 United States Code, (4) transferred to an eligible sponsor of another public airport to be reinvested in an approved noise compatibility project at that airport, and (5) paid to the Secretary for deposit in the Airport and Airway Trust Fund. c. Land shall be considered to be needed for airport purposes under this assurance if (1) it may be needed for aeronautical purposes (including runway protection zones) or serve as noise buffer land, and (2) the revenue from interim uses of such land contributes to the financial self sufficiency of the airport. Further, land purchased with a grant received by an airport operator or owner before December 31, 1987, will be considered to be needed for airport purposes if the Secretary or Federal agency making such grant before December 31, 1987, was notified by the operator or owner of the uses of such land, did not object to such use, and the land continues to be used for that purpose, such use having commenced no later than December 15, 1989. d. Disposition of such land under (a) (b) or (c) will be subject to the retention or reservation of any interest or right therein necessary to ensure that such land will only be used for purposes which are compatible with noise levels associated with operation of the airport. 32. Engineering and Design Services. Engineering and Design Services. If any phase of such project has received Federal funds under Chapter 471 subchapter 1 of Title 49 U.S.C., it will award each contract, or sub-contract for program management, construction management, planning studies, feasibility studies, architectural services, preliminary engineering, design, engineering, surveying, mapping or related services in the same manner as a contract for architectural and engineering services is negotiated under Chapter 11 of Title 40 U. S. C., or an equivalent qualifications-based requirement prescribed for or by the sponsor of the airport.

Airport Sponsor Assurances 2/2020 Page 16 of 18 3-16-0023-031-2021

33. Foreign Market Restrictions.

It will not allow funds provided under this grant to be used to fund any project which uses any product or service of a foreign country during the period in which such foreign country is listed by the United States Trade Representative as denying fair and equitable market opportunities for products and suppliers of the United States in procurement and construction.

34. Policies, Standards, and Specifications.

It will carry out any project funded under an Airport Improvement Program Grant in accordance with policies, standards, and specifications approved by the Secretary including, but not limited to, current FAA Advisory Circulars for AIP projects as of March 25, 2021.

35. Relocation and Real Property Acquisition.

a. It will be guided in acquiring real property, to the greatest extent practicable under State law, by the land acquisition policies in Subpart B of 49 CFR Part 24 and will pay or reimburse property owners for necessary expenses as specified in Subpart B.

b. It will provide a relocation assistance program offering the services described in Subpart C and fair and reasonable relocation payments and assistance to displaced persons as required in Subpart D and E of 49 CFR Part 24. c. It will make available within a reasonable period of time prior to displacement, comparable replacement dwellings to displaced persons in accordance with Subpart E of 49 CFR Part 24.

36. Access By Intercity Buses.

The airport owner or operator will permit, to the maximum extent practicable, intercity buses or other modes of transportation to have access to the airport; however, it has no obligation to fund special facilities for intercity buses or for other modes of transportation.

37. Disadvantaged Business Enterprises. The sponsor shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin or sex in the award and performance of any DOT-assisted contract covered by 49 CFR Part 26, or in the award and performance of any concession activity contract covered by 49 CFR Part 23. In addition, the sponsor shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin or sex in the administration of its Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) and Airport Concessions Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (ACDBE) programs or the requirements of 49 CFR Parts 23 and 26. The sponsor shall take all necessary and reasonable steps under 49 CFR Parts 23 and 26 to ensure nondiscrimination in the award and administration of DOT-assisted contracts, and/or concession contracts. The sponsor's DBE and ACDBE programs, as required by 49 CFR Parts 26 and 23, and as approved by DOT, are incorporated by reference in this agreement. Implementation of these programs is a legal obligation and failure to carry out its terms shall be treated as a violation of this agreement. Upon notification to the sponsor of its failure to carry out its approved program, the Department may impose sanctions as provided for under Parts 26 and 23 and may, in appropriate cases, refer the matter for enforcement under 18 U.S.C. 1001 and/or the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1936 (31 U.S.C. 3801).

38. Hangar Construction. If the airport owner or operator and a person who owns an aircraft agree that a hangar is to be constructed at the airport for the aircraft at the aircraft owner's expense, the airport owner or

Airport Sponsor Assurances 2/2020 Page 17 of 18 3-16-0023-031-2021

operator will grant to the aircraft owner for the hangar a long term lease that is subject to such terms and conditions on the hangar as the airport owner or operator may impose.

39. Competitive Access.

a. If the airport owner or operator of a medium or large hub airport (as defined in section 47102 of title 49, U.S.C.) has been unable to accommodate one or more requests by an air carrier for access to gates or other facilities at that airport in order to allow the air carrier to provide service to the airport or to expand service at the airport, the airport owner or operator shall transmit a report to the Secretary that-

1. Describes the requests; 2. Provides an explanation as to why the requests could not be accommodated; and

3. Provides a time frame within which, if any, the airport will be able to accommodate the requests. b. Such report shall be due on either February 1 or August 1 of each year if the airport has been unable to accommodate the request(s) in the six month period prior to the applicable due date.

Airport Sponsor Assurances 2/2020 Page 18 of 18 3-16-0023-031-2021

Current FAA Advisory Circulars Required for Use in AIP Funded and PFC Approved Projects

View the most current versions of FAA's Advisory Circulars (A/Cs) here:

https://www.faa.gov/regulations policies/advisory circulars/

Airports A/Cs are found in the 150 series. In addition Airspace A/Cs, found in the 70 series, also may apply for certain projects.

Airport Sponsor Assurances 2/2020 Page 19 of 1 BLANK PAGE McCALL CITY COUNCIL 216 East Park Street AGENDA BILL McCall, Idaho 83638 Number AB 21-196 Meeting Date July 22, 2021

AGENDA ITEM INFORMATION SUBJECT: Originator Department Approvals Initials or Supporter Request Approval of Hangar 523 Lease Mayor / Council Terminations for Hafenfeld and SEICO City Manager Clerk Originator Treasurer Community Development Police Department Public Works Golf Course COST IMPACT: Parks and Recreation FUNDING Airport SOURCE: Library TIMELINE: Information Systems Grant Coordinator SUMMARY STATEMENT: At the June 24, 2021 Council Meeting, Council approved a lease termination and new lease for Hangar 523. Richard A. Bush and Pamela S. Bush are purchased Hangar 523 from SEICO, LLC and are requesting a new lease for Hangar 523 and to terminate the existing lease with Bruce A. & Sylvia J. Hafenfeld. When the lease went to title it was identified that some errors had occurred over time and some documents are needed to clean up those issues. This is the timeline and issues: 1. 2014 SEICO Purchased Hangar 523 2. 2016 Hafenfeld purchased the hangar from SEICO. a. 2016 An error was made in that there was a lease assumption and then a new lease (Hafenfeld), instead of a lease termination (SEICO) and then a new lease (Hafenfeld). b. To add to the issue, the lease assumption has SEICO as the assignee and should have been the assignor, and now is showing as a Title Exception. 3. On June 24th a lease termination (SEICO) and new lease (Bush) was approved by the Council a. There should have been a Lease Termination for both SEICO and Hafenfeld The documents to correct the issues are attached, lease terminations for Hafenfelds and SEICO. The New Lease for Richard A. Bush and Pamela S. Bush was properly presented and approved at the June 24th Council Meeting. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve of Hangar 523 Lease Terminations for Hafenfeld and SEICO and authorize the Mayor to sign all necessary documents. RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE ACTION

Hangar 523

Recording Requested By and When Recorded Return to:

City Clerk City of McCall 216 East Park Street McCall, Idaho 83638

______For Recording Purposes Do Not Write Above This Line

MCCALL MUNICIPAL AIRPORT NOTICE OF LEASE TERMINATION

That certain Lease interest between the City of McCall, an Idaho municipal corporation (City), and SEICO, LLC (Lessee), for Hangar 523 at McCall Municipal Airport Land described as follows:

UNIT 523 MCCALL MUNICIPAL AIRPORT, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATE IN THE E½SW¼ OF SECTION 16 TOWNSHIP 18 NORTH RANGE 3 EAST BOISE MERIDIAN CITY OF MCCALL, VALLEY COUNTY, IDAHO MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS;

COMMENCING AT A BRASS CAP MARKING THE S¼ CORNER OF SECTION 16 TOWNSHIP 18 NORTH RANGE 3 EAST BOISE MERIDIAN, CITY OF MCCALL, VALLEY COUNTY, IDAHO; THENCE NORTH 00°36'51” EAST 14.80 FEET ALONG THE EAST BOUNDARY OF THE E½SW¼ OF SAID SECTION 16; THENCE NORTH 89°23’09” WEST 12.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°36’51” EAST 1369.75 FEET TO THE REAL POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 00°36’51” EAST 42.50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°23’09” WEST 36.00 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 00°36’51” WEST 42.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°23’09” EAST 36.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING

The McCall City Council authorized termination of Hangar Lease 523 at McCall Municipal Airport dated December 5, 2014 recorded as Instrument #389198, and the issuance of a new Lease at its regular meeting held June 24, 2021.

SIGNATURES FOR THE LESSOR ARE ON PAGE 2 OF 3

SIGNATURES FOR THE LESSEE ARE ON PAGE 3 OF 3

Page 1 of 3 Lease Termination Hangar 523

LESSOR: CITY OF MCCALL, IDAHO

By: Robert S. Giles, Mayor

Attest: BessieJo Wagner, City Clerk

STATE OF IDAHO ) : ss County of Valley )

On this ____ day of ______, 2021, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared Robert S. Giles and BessieJo Wagner, the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively of the CITY OF McCALL, IDAHO, known to me or identified to me to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that they executed the same and were so authorized to do so on behalf of the City of McCall, Idaho.

(SEAL) Notary Public

Page 2 of 3 Lease Termination Hangar 523

LESSEE: SEICO, LLC

David M. Shotwell, Managing Member

STATE OF ) : ss County of )

On this ____ day of ______, 2021, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared David M. Shotwell, Managing Member known to me or identified to me to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument executed the same.

(SEAL) Notary Public

Page 3 of 3 Lease Termination

Recording Requested By and When Recorded Return to:

City Clerk City of McCall 216 East Park Street McCall, Idaho 83638

______For Recording Purposes Do Not Write Above This Line

MCCALL MUNICIPAL AIRPORT NOTICE OF LEASE TERMINATION

That certain Lease between the City of McCall, an Idaho municipal corporation (City), and Bruce A. Hafenfeld and Sylvia J. Hafenfeld (Lessee), for Hangar 523 at McCall Municipal Airport dated July 30, 2016 recorded as Instrument #399987 will be terminated on July 1, 2021 at the request of Bruce A Hafenfeld and Sylvia J. Hafenfeld. The McCall City Council authorized terminating of lease, and the issuance of a new lease at its regular meeting held June 24, 2021.

LESSOR: CITY OF MCCALL, IDAHO

By: Robert S. Giles, Mayor

Attest: BessieJo Wagner, City Clerk

STATE OF IDAHO ) : ss County of Valley )

(SEAL) Notary Public

SIGNATURES FOR THE LESSEE ARE ON PAGE 2 OF 2

Page 1 of 2

LESSEE:

Bruce A. Hafenfeld

STATE OF ) : ss County of )

On this ____ day of ______, 2021, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared Bruce A. Hafenfeld known to me or identified to me to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument executed the same.

(SEAL) Notary Public

Sylvia J. Hafenfeld

STATE OF ) : ss County of )

On this ____ day of ______, 2021, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared Sylvia J. Hafenfeld known to me or identified to me to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument executed the same.

(SEAL) Notary Public

Page 2 of 2

McCALL CITY COUNCIL 216 East Park Street AGENDA BILL McCall, Idaho 83638 Number AB 21-193 Meeting Date July 22, 2021

AGENDA ITEM INFORMATION SUBJECT: Originator Department Approvals Initials or Supporter Request to Approve the Second Extension of Mayor / Council Agreement for City Attorney/Civil Legal Services City Manager Clerk Originator with White Peterson Gigray & Nichols, P.A. Treasurer Community Development Police Department Public Works Golf Course COST IMPACT: ~$110,000 Parks and Recreation FUNDING General Fund FY22 Airport SOURCE: Library TIMELINE: Effective 10/1/2021 – 09/30/22 Information Systems Grant Coordinator SUMMARY STATEMENT: Council selected White Peterson Gigray & Nichols, P.A. as the city’s legal services provider and approved the contract for services effective October 1, 2019. The contract provides for annual renewal at which time the firm and the city evaluate the retainer hours used in the previous year to determine any adjustments. Staff has reviewed the retainer hours used to date for FY21 with White Peterson and supports the requested renewal at 45 hours per month of legal services. The FY22 proposed budget incorporates the new contract estimate.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve the Second Extension of Agreement for City Attorney / Civil Legal Services with White Peterson Gigray & Nichols, P.A. and authorize the Mayor to sign all necessary documents. RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE ACTION Sept 26, 2019 Legal services contract with White Peterson Gigray & Nichols approved October 22, 2020 First extension of legal services contract with White Peterson Gigray & Nichols approved

SECOND EXTENSION OF AGREEMENT FOR CITY ATTORNEY / CIVIL LEGAL SERVICES

THIS SECOND EXTENSION OF AGREEMENT FOR CITY ATTORNEY / CIVIL LEGAL SERVICES (“2021-22 EXTENSION”) is made by and between the CITY OF MCCALL, a municipal corporation organized and existing by virtue of the laws of the state of Idaho, and WHITE PETERSON GIGRAY & NICHOLS, P.A., an Idaho professional association.

Whereas, the City and White Peterson entered into an original Agreement for City Attorney/ Civil Legal Services for the term of October 1, 2019 to September 30, 2020 that was extended through September 30, 2021.

Whereas, at this time, the City and White Peterson mutually desire to renew and extend such Agreement, pursuant to Section 7, on the same terms and conditions, with adjustments in hours and total retainer, for another City fiscal year.

Therefore, this written Second Extension Agreement is hereby entered effective October 1, 2021 and modifies the Agreement, Section 5, by extension of the term for October 1, 2021 through September 30, 2022, with the following modified terms:

3.2 Retainer Services Hours: The City anticipates that it will on average require approximately forty-five (45) hours of Retainer Legal Services per month and wishes to retain flexibility in how those hours are used and allocated to legal services with the understanding that there will be variability in demand from month to month. It is also helpful for White Peterson to have a base estimate of monthly hours for purposes of resource allocation. Semi-annually, or more frequently upon request, the City and White Peterson will review the hours of legal services provided. If the average monthly usage exceeds or falls below the set hour level by more than ten percent (10%) then an adjustment will be made. Such adjustments may include no change pending review of further monthly usage, credit to the City of unused hours to future billings ("banking"), credit to the City of unused retainer hours toward Additional Legal Services, payment of excess hours to White Peterson as Additional Legal Services, and/or other equitable adjustments to balance the average monthly use. In addition to these services, White Peterson agrees to conduct up to six hours of training to City on topics to be determined by the City Manager or City Council which training will be at no additional charge.

4.1 As compensation for all Retainer Legal Services, excluding all out-of-pocket and travel expenses incurred by White Peterson in performing the Retainer Legal Services, City shall pay White Peterson the sum of Eight Thousand Five Hundred Fifty and no/100 Dollars ($8,550.00) per month.

4.1.1 Payment for Retainer Legal Services shall be due monthly in advance on or before the fifteenth (15thth) day of each month. Although the parties acknowledge that the

Second Extension of Retainer Agreement – Page 1

Retainer Legal Services are provided on a flat-fee basis, White Peterson agrees to maintain accurate monthly time records of all Retainer Legal Services provided by its attorneys (itemized by date, including a description of services and reference to applicable department or matter, and referencing the attorney or legal assistant performing services) and to provide the same to City on a monthly basis and for use in evaluating the Retainer Services Hours as set forth in 3.2.

4.1.2 City shall also reimburse White Peterson for actual out-of-pocket expenses (such as travel and lodging) incurred by White Peterson in the performance of the Retainer Services. Such expenses will be itemized as provided in 4.2.2 below and upon request copies of supporting documentation of the expenses shall be furnished to City.

4.2 Compensation for Additional Legal Services performed by White Peterson at the request of the City shall be paid at the discounted hourly rates attached as Schedule A.

4.2.1 City shall also reimburse White Peterson for actual out-of-pocket expenses (such as travel, lodging, filing fees, postage, etc.) incurred by White Peterson in the performance of the Additional Legal Services. Such expenses will be itemized and upon request copies of supporting documentation of the expenses shall be furnished to City.

4.2.2 White Peterson will provide the City with a monthly itemized invoice of all Additional Legal Services performed (including all out-of-pocket expenses on both Retainer and Additional legal services). Provided the invoice is received by the tenth (10th) day of the month, the City shall remit payment to White Peterson by the fifteenth (15th) business day of the following month.

CITY OF MCCALL

By: ______Robert Giles, Mayor

ATTEST: ______BessieJo Wagner, City Clerk

WHITE, PETERSON, GIGRAY, & NICHOLS, P.A.

By: ______William F. Nichols, President

W:\Work\M\McCall, City of 21684\Admin-Retainer services\2021-22 Extension Legal Svcs Agreement.docx

Second Extension of Retainer Agreement – Page 2

SCHEDULE A

HOURLY RATES ADDITIONAL LEGAL SERVICES

Base 20% Discount Attorneysi Hourly Rateii Hourly Rate William F. Nichols $250 $200 William L. Punkoney $225 $180 William F. Gigray, III $250 $200 Matthew A. Johnson $250 $200 Jay J. Kiiha $250 $200 Phil Peterson $225 $180 William F. “Bud” Yost $250 $200 Brian T. O’Bannon $225 $180 David A. Heida $250 $200 Marc Bybee $200 $160

Base 20% Discount Legal Assistantsi Hourly Rateii Hourly Rate Jan Achey $150 $120 Joan Howell $100 $80 Tia Kliegl $100 $80 LeAnn Hembree $120 $96 Other (range) $100-$140 $80 - $112

i Any attorneys or legal assistants added to the firm will be billed at 80% of their Base Hourly Rate ii No change in Base Hourly Rate without a 90 day notification, but not before July 1, 2022

Second Extension of Retainer Agreement – Page 3

McCALL CITY COUNCIL 216 East Park Street AGENDA BILL McCall, Idaho 83638 Number AB 21-197 Meeting Date July 22, 2021

AGENDA ITEM INFORMATION SUBJECT: Originator Department Approvals Initials or Supporter Title 4 Business Regulations Discussion Mayor / Council Regarding Possible Code Amendments City Manager Clerk Originator Treasurer Community Development Police Department Public Works Golf Course COST IMPACT: n/a Parks and Recreation FUNDING n/a Airport SOURCE: Library TIMELINE: n/a Information Systems Grant Coordinator SUMMARY STATEMENT: Staff has been reviewing the current Title 4 Business Regulations. There have been some questions as to who or what type of business needs to have a license and which businesses do not. All businesses that are within the City limits are required to have a business license; however, there are some exceptions. The attached memo walks through some types of businesses that are not currently called out within the code. By addressing these types of businesses specifically, it gives more transparency as to how these businesses are expected to operate within the City of McCall.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Review the Memo and give direction to staff to create an ordinance to address the code amendments to Title 4 Business Regulations. RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE ACTION

Memo

To: City Council From: BessieJo Wagner, City Clerk CC: Anette Spickard, City Manager Date: 7/16/2021 Re: McCall Title 4 Business Regulations Review

Staff has been reviewing the current Title 4 Business Regulations. There have been some questions as to who or what type of business needs to have a license and which businesses do not. All businesses that are within the City limits are required to have a business license; however, there are some exceptions. As staff works through these exceptions, it is requested that Council determine the purpose or value of these exceptions. The goal of this work session is to give direction to staff regarding a code amendment to address some or all of the items below or to direct staff to leave the code as written.

Who needs a Business license?

McCall City Codes defines a business as:

4.2.2: TRADE, BUSINESS, AND PROFESSION DEFINED: As used in this chapter trade, business, and profession shall be defined as those persons, entities, or activities, which hold themselves out to the public as businesses, trades, or professions regardless of size including such trades, businesses, or professions that constitute home occupations as defined in title III of this code. Excluding vendors, peddlers, events, or street carnivals as defined in this title.

4.2.1: PURPOSE: The purpose of this chapter is to maintain an accurate listing of the trades, businesses, and professions located in the city in order to:

(A) Further the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of McCall, so that the city, especially the police, paramedics, and firefighters, have knowledge of the materials and activities present within such businesses in the event of emergencies; and

(B) Allow the city and other interested parties to better communicate with the McCall business community and comprehend the business categories that may be over or under served in the area.

Special Types of Businesses

Currently all businesses that have a place of business within the City limits is required to have a business license. Within our code the following have been called out in their own chapters as the type of business requires some additional requirements:

• Snow Removal Contractors (whether they have a physical address within the city) • Taxicabs and Commercial Transportation Services • Pawnbrokers • Child Daycare

The following are a list of types of businesses that may need their own chapter under Business Regulations

• General Contractors

When the City first instituted the Streets LOT (1% general tax and 3% lodging) it was staff’s understanding that all general contractors would need to collect a “use” tax on materials brought into the city for construction purposes. To ensure that the use tax was collected, all general contractors were required to obtain a city business license. Within a year of administering the tax, staff was informed that under the City’s Local Option Tax ordinance the City could not collect the use tax. All use tax was refunded; however, the city continued to require all general contractors to get a City business license. Staff has done a survey of city departments to determine if there is value in maintaining a business license for general contractors and at this time, staff does not see the value.

• Tree Removal Service

The city has a code that covers tree removal within the City of McCall. During the recent development boom, there have been trees removed without the proper approval process (developments and right of ways). Staff feels that if all tree removal businesses whether in the city limits or not, should be required to obtain a city business license. The value is that within the business regulations code it will tie back to the Tree Code and the requirements for both public and private trees, and hopefully discourage leaving large piles of woodchips.

• Realtors

Currently, if realtors are working under a particular broker, then the broker carries the business license. There have been some comments that if the city requires multiple businesses in the same location to obtain separate business licenses, then each realtor should be required to obtain their own business license. Each realtor is required to have their own state license. Staff is neutral on this subject but felt that since there has been some push back that it warranted a discussion from the Council.

 Page 2

• Salon Professionals

Beauticians, stylists, nail techs, estheticians, etc, some of these professionals are considered employees of the salon they operate out of, while others often rent a space in the established business. Since they are not considered an employee, they operate their own “business” out of that lease space. This subject, like realtors, warrants a discussion to determine whether there is value in requiring a separate business license for those leasing the space. There may be some determining facts to consider such as if they sell their own product or whether the Salon sells the product.

• Short-term rentals

With the new regulations set in Title 3 of the McCall City Code, staff suggests that a separate chapter in Title 4 Business Regulations be considered. In title3 it states “No short-term rentals within the City of McCall shall operate without obtaining a business license. Short-term rentals with a local property manager who maintains a physical office in the City of McCall or Impact Area may operate under the business license held by that local property manager.” Staff would like to amend that statement by removing “Short-term rentals with a local property manager who maintains a physical office in the City of McCall or Impact Area may operate under the business license held by that local property manager.” The purpose is that since the instituting of the regulations set by Title 3, staff is having difficulty getting the Declarations of Compliance Forms on each Short-term rental managed by the property management companies. By setting these out in their own chapter we can tie it back to title 3 and require all Short-term rentals to be registered with the City. The fee structure can be set in such a way that the first is a Business license and then there is a fee for each rental the owner registers. There has been significant time added to staff when processing a short-term rental business application with the requirement of obtaining the Declaration of Compliance forms therefore justifying a separate fee structure for short-term rental registration.

LIMITED DURATION BUSINESS LICENSES

• Food Trucks

Currently, food trucks are addressed within the code as a vendor. Staff would like to entertain the idea of having a subcategory under Vendors for special provisions of food trucks on private and public property and food truck courts. Staff has had some conversations internally regarding the use of 2nd Street for food trucks during the non-snow seasons in McCall. Staff would like to hear from the Council regarding the idea of allowing food trucks on 2nd Street. This street was designed for such activity as well as event types of activity. Also, Staff would like to hear from Council on the idea of a food truck court.

• Produce Stands

Currently produce stands are covered in the code as a vendor. There has been some interest in calling this category out separately. Some farmers have been interested in having a produce only stand apart from the Farmers Market since the market moved out of town. Currently they

 Page 3

are treated the same as any other vendor. For a Market to be considered a Farmers Market, they must comply with all the state rules that govern Farmers Markets.

• Open Air Market

There has been some staff discussion on the value of defining an Open Air Market, sometimes referred to as a “Saturday” Market. The idea is to have certain times of the wee where vendors can gather on 2nd Street to sell their merchandise. Would the Council be interested in this concept? Would there be a separate fee for a vendor at this type of market vs an event?

• Street musicians/performers/artists

The McCall City Code is currently silent regarding this category. The question has been raised as to whether there is any value in including this category. Currently Street musicians/performers/artists that come to McCall can perform on City property without permission if there is no charge. Should there be parameters put on these types of artists such as they are allowed to perform if they do not block a sidewalk or disturb another’s enjoyment of the park.

 Page 4 Firefox https://export.amlegal.com/api/export-requests/62bd9c19-370f-4941-84a...

4.1.2: DEFINITIONS: APPLICANT: The one person or legal entity who is responsible for the permit or license being applied for. BUSINESS: All activities, trades, and pursuits conducted or engaged in including, without limitation, wholesale businesses, retail businesses, personal service businesses and professions, and businesses conducted as home occupations in any and all situations where suppliers, vendors, customers, clients, and/or members of the general public visit or frequent the premises where the business or occupation is conducted. CHILD DAYCARE: Any person, persons, or organization that provides care for seven (7) or more children, not related by blood, and receives compensation for even one of those children. CITY: The city of McCall, Idaho. CITY CLERK: The city clerk of the city of McCall, Idaho, or designated agent. CITY COUNCIL: The city council of the city of McCall, Idaho. CITY PARKS: Those parcels of land that are owned or managed by the city of McCall and are held for public use or as open or green space, including, but not limited to, city parks and parking lots. CRAFT FAIRS AND BAZAARS: An event, market, or group of stalls and/or booths organized and managed by an organization consisting of open air showing at which objects made by crafters and miscellaneous articles are offered for sale. EXEMPT NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION: An organization which is exempt from federal income tax as a charitable or nonprofit organization. To establish such exempt nonprofit status, when the permittee and the recipient are not both known by the city clerk to be on the face of the matter exempt from federal income tax, such as national youth organizations, churches, or recognized service clubs such as Rotary, or the Lions, the organizer shall file with its application for the permit: (A) A copy of its tax exempt status determination letter from the IRS, or (B) A certification from a certified public accountant licensed in Idaho that such organizer files an information return with the IRS as a tax exempt organization, or (C) A certification from a certified public accountant licensed in Idaho that such organizer is not required to file an income tax information return because it is a tax exempt organization with less than the threshold amount of income necessary to trigger a filing requirement. FARM PRODUCE: All agricultural, horticultural, viticultural, and vegetable products of the soil, apiary products, eggs, and cheese; but, not timber and timber products, livestock, poultry, poultry products other than eggs, dairy products other than cheese, field grains, dried beans, dried peas, hops or seeds. FARM PRODUCER: Any person engaged in the business or avocation of growing or producing any farm products. FARMERS' MARKET: A street oriented event, market, or group of stalls and booths organized and managed by an exempt nonprofit organization consisting of open air showing where farmers and sometimes other vendors sell their products directly to consumers and also the place where the related activity occurs. GOODS, SALE AND SELL: Have the same definitions as under the uniform commercial code, except that the time and the location of the sale is not determined by the passage of title or by the terms of delivery, but by the time at which and location at which the agreement was made to enter into the purchase and sale. PAWNBROKERS: Every person, firm, association or corporation who makes it a business to loan money on deposit or purchase of personal property or other valuable thing, or who deals in the purchase of personal property or other valuable thing on condition of selling the same back again at a stipulated price, or who loans money secured by security agreement or personal property, having possession of the property, or any

1 of 3 7/21/2021, 11:11 AM Firefox https://export.amlegal.com/api/export-requests/62bd9c19-370f-4941-84a...

portion or part thereof so secured or who advertises by use of "three ball", or pawnbroker's sign, or by advertising "unredeemed pledges", or by using the term "uncle", or by any other expression designating pawnbroker's business, shall, for all intents and purposes under this title be declared to be a pawnbroker within the meaning of this title. PEDDLER: Any person, whether a resident of the city or not, traveling by foot, motor vehicle, or any other type of conveyance, from place to place, from house to house, or from street to street, carrying, conveying, offering, or exposing goods or services for sale or rent, or offering to purchase goods; excluding from this definition a person making delivery of goods previously ordered by the customer; and excluding from this definition a person who is not a peddler and whose activity in major part is thus driving a regular route to the location of existing customers who have arranged for return visits; and excluding from this definition any school age child fundraising for their school, sport, or activity such as, but not limited to, Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts. PERMANENT PLACE OF BUSINESS: A building or significant portion of a building which is the primary business location within McCall, and which building or portion of a building is owned (or leased for the majority of the year) by, and in the exclusive possession of the person who owns the business being conducted. POLICE CHIEF: The chief of police for the city of McCall, Idaho, or designated agent. SALES REPRESENTATIVE: A person employed to represent a business and to sell its merchandise or someone who demonstrates an article to a prospective buyer. SHORT TERM RENTALS: A residence, including single-family or a multi-family unit, and any single rooms of the aforementioned, which is rented for the purpose of overnight lodging for compensation, money, rent or other bargained for consideration for a period of one or more days and not more than thirty (30) consecutive days. Short term rentals are also commonly referred to as tourist or vacation rentals. SNOW REMOVAL CONTRACTOR: A person or company contracted, for compensation, to clear snow from a road or driveway after a snowfall to make travel easier and safer. SPECIAL EVENT: The temporary use of private or public property, including streets, parking lots, parks and waterways, for the purpose of conducting certain public events such as, but not limited to, art shows, music concerts, fundraising events, amusement attractions, circuses, carnivals, rodeos, craft fairs, contests, dances, tournaments, walk-a-thons, marathons, races, exhibitions, fairs, shows, citywide celebrations and festivals or related activities and may involve a street closure, attraction of an anticipated fifty (50) or more people at any one time, or where two (2) or more vendors are gathered. In addition, a "special event" is any public event which could reasonably be interpreted to cause significant public impact via disturbance, crowd, traffic/parking or disruption of the normal routine of the community or affected neighborhood. STAND: A cart, parked vehicle, tables, shelves, booth, stall, rack, or any other temporary business location, exterior to a building, and located on a public right of way or on private property adjacent thereto; a vehicle is parked within the meaning of this definition when it is not moving at the time of the solicitation of the sale. STREET CLOSURE: The deliberate or incidental temporary blockage of all, or a portion of, a public or private street, alley, highway, public right of way, parking lot, or other thoroughfare used for pedestrian or vehicular circulation. TAXICABS AND COMMERCIAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES: Any service regularly used for the purpose of transporting persons for hire, which receives or discharges passengers within the city limits, or advertises for such use, whether or not such service or services are engaged in carrying passengers entirely within the city limits; and as further defined in section 4.4.1 of this title. VENDOR: Every person who offers goods or services for sale or rent, or offers to purchase goods, on the streets, or from a vehicle or a stand, or acts as an itinerant vendor, and who does not have a permanent place of business within the city of McCall which offers the same type of goods or services for sale or rent; and excluding from this definition a person whose activities are covered by a concession or lease contract

2 of 3 7/21/2021, 11:11 AM Firefox https://export.amlegal.com/api/export-requests/62bd9c19-370f-4941-84a...

with the city for activities on city property such as a park. (Ord. 945, 8-11-2016)

3 of 3 7/21/2021, 11:11 AM Firefox https://export.amlegal.com/api/export-requests/d4919138-e990-40a7-8c3...

CHAPTER 7

LIMITED DURATION BUSINESS LICENSES

SECTION: 4.7.1: Purpose 4.7.2: Vendor's Licenses; Fee And Permit; Application 4.7.3: Peddler's Licenses; Fee, Permit, Application; And Investigation Required 4.7.4: Farmers' Market; Application, Permit, And Fee 4.7.5: Animal Drawn Vehicles; Application, Permit, And Fee 4.7.6: Craft Fairs And Bazaars; Application, Permit, And Fee 4.7.1: PURPOSE: (A) The primary purpose of the public streets, sidewalks and other public ways is for use by vehicular and pedestrian traffic. (B) Reasonable regulation of vending on public ways is necessary to protect the public health, safety, and welfare. (C) The economic base of the city is tourism and related services such as, but not limited to, vending, and that maintaining and enhancing the appearance, character and beauty of the city is necessary to protect and promote the economic base and the general welfare of the community. (D) It is the policy of the city to promote the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare by the regulation of off site vendors operating inside the city. (E) Reasonable regulation of off site vendors is necessary to ensure that any stand or structure design and construction for purpose of off site vending is safe, orderly, and harmonious with the appearance and character of the neighborhood and the city, and provides for safe and adequate pedestrian and vehicular traffic. (F) Reasonable regulation of off site vendors is necessary to protect and conserve the economic base of the community, including property values. (G) The regulations contained in this chapter are not intended to prohibit or hamper speech which is protected by the first amendment, but merely to regulate specific activities which are commercial in nature. (Ord. 938, 12-17-2015) 4.7.2: VENDOR'S LICENSES; FEE AND PERMIT; APPLICATION: (A) No person shall do business as a "vendor" as defined in section 4.1.2 of this title, or as part of a "public event" as defined in section 4.8.1 of this title within the city of McCall without first obtaining a permit as a vendor from the city clerk and paying a license fee for the permit. Excluded are vendors of farmers' markets and sales representatives. (B) The application for such permit shall be filed with the city clerk not less than seventy two (72) hours prior to the first day upon which sales are intended to occur. An application for such license shall be made to the city clerk in such form and manner as provided by the city clerk's office and will include the following: 1. Name and description of the applicant; if the applicant is an association, company, or corporation, then it shall submit a separate application for each natural person who will be acting as a vendor in the city,

1 of 7 7/21/2021, 10:36 AM Firefox https://export.amlegal.com/api/export-requests/d4919138-e990-40a7-8c3...

and each shall receive and maintain a separate permit; 2. Address, both legal and local; 3. A brief description of the nature of the business and of the goods or services to be sold or rented, or the goods to be purchased, and in the case of products of farm or orchard, whether produced or grown by the applicant; 4. The date or dates for which the permit is requested which must include days when the stand is left in place, whether or not open for business; 5. The proposed method of operation; 6. If a vehicle is to be used, a description of the same, together with its registered license plate number and to whom it is registered; 7. State sales tax number, federal tax number, and driver's license number of applicant; 8. A statement as to whether or not the applicant has been convicted of a violation of any federal, state or municipal law, the nature of the offense and the date, and the punishment or penalty assessed therefor; 9. When the applicant proposes to sell any prepared food product for human consumption (other than frozen products not intended for immediate consumption), an approval from Central district health that the proposed method of food preparation and service meets applicable health standards; 10. The property description of each location of sale, rental, or purchase activity, and written and notarized permission of the owner or owners of such real property to engage in or conduct business on such property; if there is any question of the ownership of the property, it is the duty of the applicant to furnish satisfactory proof of the same; 11. A photograph of any stand which the applicant will use to conduct sales from and a photograph of any signage; 12. The license application fee. (C) The fee for the license or permit shall be set from time to time by resolution of the city council, and shall provide for per diem and for per annum fees. Such fees shall be nonrefundable. (D) A person holding a vendor's permit or license which is part of another licensed street carnival or event during a winter carnival issued by the organizers of such carnival or event, shall not be required to hold a permit issued by the city under this section. (E) A person which is a part of a craft fair or bazaar shall not be required to hold a permit issued by the city under this section. (F) The city's or event organizer's permit shall in the case of a vendor be posted upon the stand at all times when the stand is open for business. The activities conducted by the vendor must conform to the description in the application for the permit. No sign shall be on or about a vendor's stand making any statement that is untrue or is at variance from the application; for one example: A sign shall not state "local produce" if either in fact or according to the application the produce was not grown on land in Long Valley within Valley County, Idaho, or Meadows Valley within Adams County, Idaho. If a statement made in the application for a vendor's license is false, or if a statement made by a sign at a vendor's stand is false, the permit shall be void. (G) Doing business as a vendor without a valid vendor's permit, or making a false statement in a submitted application; or purporting to be an applicant, when in fact merely selling one's ability to obtain a permit or to obtain a permit at a lesser fee; or falsely certifying the status of a group as exempt from federal income tax; are all misdemeanors, and each day the violation continues is a separate offense. The police department is authorized to require a vendor doing business as a vendor without a vendor's permit displayed on the vehicle or stand, forthwith to remove their vehicle or stand from the city.

2 of 7 7/21/2021, 10:36 AM Firefox https://export.amlegal.com/api/export-requests/d4919138-e990-40a7-8c3...

(H) All persons doing business as a vendor must abide by the following for signage: 1. Limit the square footage of allowable vendor signage to fifteen (15) total square feet. 2. The maximum square footage includes A-frame portable signs so long as they are not located on a sidewalk or public pathway and are within twenty five feet (25') from the point of sale. 3. The maximum square footage includes flags or banners, so long as the flags or banners are not freestanding (i.e., should be mounted to the vendor's tent, truck, table, booth, etc.). (I) The permitting process for a nonprofit organization vendor shall be the same as a for profit vendor. (J) Those exempt from requiring a vendor's permit are school age children selling various fundraising items including, but not limited to, Girl and Boy Scouts, school sponsored sporting or music events, school age clubs such as Optimists. (Ord. 946, 8-11-2016) 4.7.3: PEDDLER'S LICENSES; FEE, PERMIT, APPLICATION; AND INVESTIGATION REQUIRED: (A) Every person, acting as a "peddler" as defined in section 4.1.2 of this title, shall apply to the city for a peddler's license as required by this chapter. The application for such permit shall be filed with the city clerk not less than eight (8) weeks prior to the first day upon which sales are intended to occur. An application for such license shall be made to the city clerk in such form and manner as provided by the city clerk's office and will include the following: 1. Name and description of the applicant; if the applicant is an association, company, or corporation, then it shall submit a separate application for each natural person who will be acting as a peddler in the city, and each shall receive and maintain a separate permit; 2. Address, both legal and local; 3. A brief description of the nature of the business and of the goods or services to be sold or rented, or the goods to be purchased; 4. If employed, the name and address of the employer, together with credentials establishing the exact relationship between the employer and the applicant; and, if the net income of the peddler's operations will be payable to someone other than the peddler, but not an employer, the name and address of that payee; 5. The date or dates for which the permit is requested; 6. If a vehicle is to be used, a description of the same, together with its registered license plate number and to whom it is registered; 7. The proposed method of operation; 8. State sales tax number, federal tax number, and driver's license number of applicant; 9. Submit to a photograph to be used as identification of the applicant, showing the head and shoulders of the applicant in a clear and distinguishable manner; 10. The license application fee. (B) The fee for the license or permit shall be set from time to time by resolution of the city council, and shall provide for per diem and for per annum fees. Such fees shall be nonrefundable. (C) Upon receipt of an application for a peddler's license under this chapter, the application shall be referred to the McCall police department which shall conduct an investigation to determine the suitability of the applicant to be licensed. The investigation shall require an applicant to provide information and fingerprints necessary to obtain criminal history information from the Idaho state police and the federal bureau of investigation pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-3008 and congressional enactment public law 92544. The McCall police department shall submit a set of fingerprints obtained from the applicant and the

3 of 7 7/21/2021, 10:36 AM Firefox https://export.amlegal.com/api/export-requests/d4919138-e990-40a7-8c3...

required fees to the Idaho state police bureau of criminal identification for a criminal records check of state and national databases. The submission of fingerprints and information required by this section shall be on forms prescribed by the Idaho state police. The McCall police department is authorized to receive criminal history information from the Idaho state police and from the federal bureau of investigation for the purpose of evaluating the fitness of an applicant for licensure. As required by state and federal law, further dissemination or other use of the criminal history information is prohibited. The applicant shall pay, in advance, the fees required by the Idaho state police bureau of criminal identification for the criminal records check. (D) It is unlawful for any person to act as a "peddler" as defined in section 4.1.2 of this title within McCall city limits without first complying with the following requirements and obtaining a peddler's license. No person shall be issued a peddler's license when that person: 1. Is under the age of eighteen (18) years. 2. Is required to register as a sex offender, pursuant to the sexual offender registration notification and community right-to- know act, Idaho Code section 18-8301 et seq., and the juvenile sex offender registration notification and community right- to-know act, Idaho Code section 18-8401 et seq. 3. Has been, within five (5) years prior to the date of making application for such license, convicted of, paid any fine, been placed on probation, or is currently on probation or parole, received a deferred sentence, received a withheld judgment, sentenced to confinement (including options in lieu of confinement), or suffered the forfeiture of a bond for a felony involving the use or threat of violence against the person of another, or any felony involving the sexual enticement of minors. 4. Has been, within five (5) years prior to the date of making application for such license, convicted of, paid any fine, placed on probation, or currently is on probation or parole, received a deferred sentence, received a withheld judgment, sentenced to confinement (including options in lieu of confinement), or suffered the forfeiture of a bond for any misdemeanor, involving: (a) The use of force against the persons or property of another; (b) The threat of force against the persons of another; (c) Theft or larceny; (d) Stalking, telephone harassment, or violations of protection orders or no contact orders; (e) The use, possession, or sale of illegal drugs; or possession of paraphernalia; (f) Contributing to the delinquency of a minor; (g) Possession of a concealed weapon; or (h) Illegal sexual activity. 5. Has an outstanding warrant at the time of such application. 6. Has had a similar license revoked by the city or any other city of this state or of the United States within the preceding five (5) years. No license shall be granted to any applicant nor may a licensee maintain an existing license in good standing where satisfactory proof is submitted that such applicant violates the laws of the city while engaged in the business activity regulated by this chapter. 7. A peddler's license shall not be issued to a person who, at the time of application for renewal of a license issued hereunder would not be eligible or qualified for such license upon a first application; and a licensee must continue to have and maintain all the qualifications; and none of the disqualifications provided herein throughout the license period. It shall be the duty of the licensee to immediately notify the city clerk's office if any event, subsequent to the issuance of a peddler's license, renders the licensee ineligible or unqualified for such a license.

4 of 7 7/21/2021, 10:36 AM Firefox https://export.amlegal.com/api/export-requests/d4919138-e990-40a7-8c3...

8. Fails or refuses to provide the information or fingerprints requested during the investigative portion of the process conducted by the McCall police department. 9. Fails the investigative portion of the process conducted by the McCall police department. (E) The city, upon receipt of payment of the proper peddler's license fees, and other required information as specified, and upon compliance with the requirements of this chapter, shall issue a peddler's license. (F) Those exempt from requiring a peddler's license are school age children selling various fundraising items including, but not limited to, Girl and Boy Scouts, school sponsored sporting or music events, school age clubs such as Optimists. Also exempt are those affiliated with religion and politics. (Ord. 938, 12-17-2015) 4.7.4: FARMERS' MARKET; APPLICATION, PERMIT, AND FEE: (A) No charge or assessment of any kind shall be made or levied by the city on any wagon or vehicle or on the owner bringing farm produce to any farmers' market that may be established in the city. A permit for a farmers' market may be issued for a location on private property, on city right of way, or other city property, provided that insurance is provided with the city as a coinsured if on city property or right of way. A farmers' market shall pay a license fee as set from time to time by resolution of the city council. (B) To qualify as a farmers' market, the market organizers must comply with the market development division of the Idaho state department of agriculture and its definition of a farmers' market as outlined in the "Idaho Farmers Market Manual". (C) Allowable signage for a farmers' market are no more than two (2) directional A-frame signs, each a maximum of twelve (12) square feet placed within the public right of way of the nearest intersections, but so as not to impede pedestrian or vehicle traffic. Individual farmers' market vendors are limited to signage displayed within their allotted vending space within the farmers' market. (D) To receive a farmers' market permit from the city an application for such license shall be made to the city clerk in such form and manner as provided by the city clerk's office and will include the following: 1. The name, resident address and contact information of the applicant which, if a copartnership, shall include the name and resident address of each partner; if a corporation, association or group acting as a unit, the name and resident address of the officers and the board of directors, trustees or other governing board; 2. Proof of 501(c) status; 3. State sales tax number and federal tax number; 4. The date or dates for which the permit is requested; 5. If on city property proof of liability insurance; 6. When the applicant proposes to sell any prepared food product for human consumption (other than frozen products not intended for immediate consumption), an approval from Central district health that the proposed method of food preparation and service meets applicable health standards; 7. The property description of the location of the farmers' market, and written and notarized permission of the owner or owners of such real property to engage in or conduct business on such property; if there is any question of the ownership of the property, it is the duty of the applicant to furnish satisfactory proof of the same; 8. Evidence of a valid electrical inspection for any electrical wiring which is part of the stand and for any connection to an external power source; and 9. The license fee. (E) The fee for the license or permit shall be set from time to time by resolution of the city council. Such

5 of 7 7/21/2021, 10:36 AM Firefox https://export.amlegal.com/api/export-requests/d4919138-e990-40a7-8c3...

fees shall be nonrefundable. (Ord. 938, 12-17-2015) 4.7.5: ANIMAL DRAWN VEHICLES; APPLICATION, PERMIT, AND FEE: (A) No person shall operate for hire on the public streets and rights of way, whether for hire by the ride, per person or otherwise, a wagon or other vehicle drawn by one or more animals, without first obtaining and paying for a license from the city clerk. (B) To receive an animal drawn vehicle license from the city an application for such license shall be made to the city clerk in such form and manner as provided by the city clerk's office and will include the following: 1. Name of business; 2. Name of business owner; 3. Tax identification number; 4. Physical and mailing address; 5. Contact information; 6. Description of vehicle; 7. Proof of insurance; 8. A map of the route; 9. The license fee. (C) The license fee shall be set from time to time by resolution of the city council. (D) Such vehicle shall at all time display such lights, reflectors and other safety devices as may be required by state traffic laws. (E) Each animal used to draw such a vehicle shall wear a device which prevents deposit of feces on the ground, and such device shall be emptied from time to time at premises owned by the vehicle owner or some other place with the agreement of the owner thereof, and in either case and any event in accord with public health laws and regulations. (Ord. 938, 12-17-2015) 4.7.6: CRAFT FAIRS AND BAZAARS; APPLICATION, PERMIT, AND FEE: (A) A permit for craft fairs and bazaars may be issued for a location on private property, on a city right of way, or other city property, provided that insurance is provided with the city as a coinsured if on city property or right of way. A craft fair or bazaar shall pay a license fee as set from time to time by resolution of the city council. (B) The craft fair and bazaar organizers must collect all state and local applicable taxes and remit within the required time frame. (C) Allowable signage for craft fairs and bazaars: 1. Limit the square footage of allowable vendor signage to fifteen (15) total square feet. 2. The maximum square footage includes A-frame portable signs so long as they are not located on a sidewalk or public pathway and are within twenty five feet (25') from the point of sale. 3. The maximum square footage includes flags or banners, so long as the flags or banners are not freestanding (i.e., should be mounted to the vendor's tent, truck, table, booth, etc.). 4. Individual vendors are limited to signage displayed within their allotted vending space within the event. (D) To receive a permit for craft fairs and bazaars from the city an application for such license shall be made to the city clerk in such form and manner as provided by the city clerk's office and will include the

6 of 7 7/21/2021, 10:36 AM Firefox https://export.amlegal.com/api/export-requests/d4919138-e990-40a7-8c3...

following: 1. Name and description of the applicant; 2. Address, both legal and local; 3. Location of event; 4. The date or dates for which the permit is requested; 5. Expected attendance; 6. When the applicant proposes to have vendors who sell any prepared food product for human consumption (other than frozen products not intended for immediate consumption), an approval from Central district health that the proposed method of food preparation and service meets applicable health standards for each vendor; 7. When the applicant proposes to have vendors who sell any products they must collect all applicable state and local taxes; 8. The license fee. (E) The fee for the license or permit shall be set from time to time by resolution of the city council. Such fees shall be nonrefundable. (Ord. 947, 8-11-2016)

7 of 7 7/21/2021, 10:36 AM City of McCall

Resolution No 16- 20

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MCCALL, IDAHO, SETTING VARIOUS FEES FOR CITY CLERK FOR PERMITS AND LICENSES ISSUED UNDER TITLE 4 McCALL CITY CODE, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

WHEREAS, the City Clerk of the City of McCall have estimated the cost of providing the enumerated services and the rates required to recover those costs; and

WHEREAS, the City complied with Idaho Code 63- 1311A, by placing a Public Notice in the Star -News on August 11, and August 18, 2016 announcing a public hearing on August 25, 2016 to consider changes to the business regulations' fee schedule in the City Clerk Department; and

WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing at the August 25, 2016 Council meeting, as required by law, and considered public comment, and deliberated upon the recommended fee schedule changes; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MCCALL, Valley County, Idaho that:

Section 1: The following fee schedule is hereby adopted as the rates for listed services in the City Clerk Department:

Initiation of a New Business License 125. 00

Annual Renewal of Business License 25. 00 per year

Five Year License ( only for licenses being 100 for 5 years renewed and is nonrefundable should the business close prior to the completion of the five years) If business license is not renewed by 125. 00 January 31 of the renewal year the re- instatement fee will be required Vendor Permit 25. 00 per day 500. 00 per season( May 5- September 15) 1000. 00 per year Animal drawn vehicle 25. 00 per year

Resolution 16- 20 Business Regulations Fees

August 25, 2016 Page 1 of 2 Farmers Market 50 per season

Craft Fairs and Bazaars 50 per event

NOTE: the following fees are for permits or licenses that require fingerprints, a police investigation, and background check, and more accurately reflect the actual cost to the City. Taxi Drivers License 125. 00 per driver for a 5 year license

Pawnbroker License 125. 00 for a five year license in addition to the business license fees Peddler Permit 125. 00 quarterly per person for initial license and first day, then $ 25.00 per day thereafter ( Oct -Nov -Dec; Jan -Feb -Mar; Apr -May -Jun; Jul -Aug -Sep) Snow Removal License 125. 00 for the initial season ( October -

March) $ 25. 00 annual renewal due in October of each year Public Event Licenses 150 for < 50 people 300 for > 50 people

Section 2: This resolution shall be in full force and effect on August 26, 2016.

PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE COUNCIL AND MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MCCALL THIS 25 DAY OF AUGUST, 2016.

CITY OF MCCALL ,, u o cc '',,,,' County, Idaho Page

9 b= ATTEST: i0

411 4 -', BessieJo Resolution ner, C' 4211inko

16-20 Business Regulations Fees August

25, 2016 Valley 1 of 2 BLANK PAGE

McCALL CITY COUNCIL 216 East Park Street AGENDA BILL McCall, Idaho 83638 Number AB 21-189 Meeting Date July 22, 2021

AGENDA ITEM INFORMATION SUBJECT: Originator Department Approvals Initials or Supporter McCall Area Planning and Zoning Commission Mayor / Council Annual Report to City Council City Manager Clerk Treasurer Community Development BP Oroginator Police Department Public Works Golf Course COST IMPACT: N/A Parks and Recreation FUNDING N/A Airport SOURCE: Library TIMELINE: N/A Information Systems Grant Coordinator SUMMARY STATEMENT: Fallon Fereday, Chair, will present the McCall Area Planning and Zoning (P&Z) Commission annual report to City Council. The mission of the P&Z Commission is to make recommendations to the City Council and to the County Commissioners respecting comprehensive planning, zoning, and subdivision regulations. The P&Z Commission also applies the same to the individual proposals brought to the Commission for approval or for recommendation to Council, and, when applicable, the County Commissioners. This Commission acts in this statutory capacity as Planning and Zoning Commission under Idaho Code with respect to zoning and planning in the City proper and the McCall Impact Area. The P&Z Commission consists of seven members appointed by City Council and the County Commissioners for three-year terms, which are renewable. Meetings are ordinarily held on the first Tuesday of each month at 4:30 PM in the Legion Hall below City Hall. Members are appointed by the mayor with confirmation by the Council. RECOMMENDED ACTION: None – information only. RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE ACTION

BLANK PAGE

McCALL CITY COUNCIL 216 East Park Street AGENDA BILL McCall, Idaho 83638 Number AB 21-188 Meeting Date July 22, 2021

AGENDA ITEM INFORMATION SUBJECT: Originator Department Approvals Initials or Supporter McCall Police Department Presentation of Public Mayor / Council Safety for the 4th of July City Manager Clerk Treasurer Community Development Police Department Originator Public Works Golf Course COST IMPACT: N/A Parks and Recreation FUNDING N/A Airport SOURCE: Library TIMELINE: N/A Information Systems Grant Coordinator SUMMARY STATEMENT: The McCall Police Department will provide a summarization of public safety for the 2021 Fourth of July celebration for the time frame of June 30 – July 8, 2021.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: For discussion only.

RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE ACTION

BLANK PAGE McCALL CITY COUNCIL 216 East Park Street AGENDA BILL McCall, Idaho 83638 Number AB 21-194 Meeting Date July 22, 2021

AGENDA ITEM INFORMATION SUBJECT: Originator Department Approvals Initials or Supporter Library G.O. Bond Issue Preview, Discussion, and Mayor / Council Request to Utilize a Negotiated Bond Sale Process City Manager Supporter Clerk and Authorize Zion’s Public Finance to Circulate Treasurer Originator the Request For Proposal for an Underwriter Community Development Police Department Public Works Golf Course COST IMPACT: N/A Parks and Recreation FUNDING N/A Airport SOURCE: Library TIMELINE: ASAP Information Systems Grant Coordinator SUMMARY STATEMENT: Christian Anderson with Zion’s Public Finance will provide an update to the Council on the status of the City’s bond issuance. He will present an updated issuance calendar, a recommendation to utilize to negotiated sale process, and current market conditions. With the recommendation to utilize a negotiated sale, Christian will present a proposal to select an underwriter via Request for Proposal (RFP) and request Council authorization to circulate the RFP on July 23, 2021.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Accept the recommendation to utilize to a negotiated bond sale process. 2. Authorize Zion’s Public Finance to circulate the RFP for an underwriter on July 23,2021. RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE ACTION

General Obligation Bond Update City of McCall July 22, 2021

Christian Anderson Vice President [email protected] (208) 501-7533

1 Competitive vs. Negotiated Sale

Competitive Sale

• Bonds are sold via a “blind auction” to interested underwriting firms • Best for highly-rated bonds, particularly general obligation bonds; “plain vanilla” structures • Few pre-sale discussion opportunities with investors

Negotiated Sale

• Bonds are sold to an underwriter that is engaged up front, preferably via RFP • Best for structures or issuers that require more explanation or discussion with investors • Municipal advisor negotiates final terms with underwriter on the issuer’s behalf

2 Recommendation

Zions recommends a transition to a negotiated sale to ensure strong pricing results

• An underwriter RFP can be circulated as early as tomorrow, July 23, with a due date of August 10

• A review team of 2-3 City officials and Zions will evaluate proposals and make a recommendation to the Council

• The Council will make a formal selection on August 12

• New estimated closing date of September 21

4 Market Update

May Ballot Current Estimate

Interest Rate 2.52% Interest Rate 2.15%

Interest Cost $1,285,750 Interest Cost $1,089,819

Total Cost $5,485,750 Total Cost $5,289,819

Tax per $100,000 $15.98 Tax per $100,000 $15.41

5 Municipal Bond Interest Rates – Bond Buyer Index

5.5 BBI Current (2.04%) Average (3.56%)

5.0

4.5

4.0

3.5 Weekly Interest Rate (%) Rate Interest Weekly

3.0

2.5

2.0

Jul-11 Jul-12 Jul-13 Jul-14 Jul-15 Jul-16 Jul-17 Jul-18 Jul-19 Jul-20 Jul-21 Date Source: Bond Buyer

6 McCALL CITY COUNCIL 216 East Park Street AGENDA BILL McCall, Idaho 83638 Number AB 21-192 Meeting Date July 22, 2021

AGENDA ITEM INFORMATION SUBJECT: Originator Department Approvals Initials or Supporter Request for Council to Adopt Ordinance 1003 Mayor / Council Regarding Prohibiting the Feeding of Wildlife City Manager Clerk Supporter Treasurer Community Development Police Department Originator Public Works Golf Course COST IMPACT: N/A Parks and Recreation FUNDING N/A Airport SOURCE: Library TIMELINE: N/A Information Systems Grant Coordinator SUMMARY STATEMENT: During the July 8, 2021 Council Meeting staff presented the McCall City Council with an ordinance prohibiting wildlife feeding inside city limits. The five councilors had two decisions to make that evening, one vote to suspend the rules, referring to the actual reading of the ordinance, and the other considering its adoption. Although the Council voted 3-2 to pass the Wildlife feeding ordinance, the ordinance was not adopted due to a procedural error regarding the suspension of the rules. Idaho code 50-902 states that to pass an ordinance, the ordinance must be read three times at three different meetings, with the first two readings by Title and the third reading in full. The same code allows for the suspension of reading three times, to read by title only one time only, which requires four affirmative votes (1/2 plus one of the entire Council) for the motion to pass. The vote was an affirmative 3-2 for the suspension of the rules. Therefore, the motion should have failed, but the City Council proceeded with a single reading and vote to adopt. Since the first motion failed, the second vote to adopt the ordinance was void. Although there was a reading by Title only, the process will start over as the reading was not in the context of three readings. The process will be restarted to correct the error, with three readings at three different meetings. However, at each meeting, the Council could choose to vote for a suspension of the rules. If the motion fails, then there will be the first reading and no additional motion to adopt. Please note that only the suspension of the rules requires a ½ plus one affirmative vote. The adoption of the ordinance only takes an affirmative majority vote to pass (3-2). RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Suspend the rules and read by title only, one time only Ordinance no. 1003. 2. Adopt Ordinance No. 1003. regarding prohibiting the feeding of wildlife, approve the publication of the summary, and authorize the Mayor to sign all necessary documents. RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE ACTION May 27, 2021 Council directed staff to continue with preparation of a proposed Ordinance prohibiting the feeding of wildlife June 10, 2021 Council reviewed possible Ordinance language June 24, 2021 Additional review and discussion and direction to staff to bring finalized Ordinance for adoption July 8, 2021 Council Adopted the Ordinance – with a procedural error

ORDINANCE NO. 1003

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF McCALL, VALLEY COUNTY, IDAHO, AMENDING TITLE 5, PUBLIC SAFETY, CHAPTER 7, ANIMAL CONTROL, OF THE McCALL CITY CODE, TO-WIT: AMENDING SECTION 5.7.010, DEFINITIONS, TO ADD THE FOLLOWING DEFINITIONS: ATTRACTING/ATTRACTANT, BIRDS, EDIBLE MATERIAL, FEEDING/FEED, HABITUATED, PUBLIC EMPLOYEE, SQUIRRELS, WATERFOWL, WILD TURKEY, WILDLIFE AND AMEND THE DEFINITION FOR IMPOUNDED; ENACTING SECTION 5.7.400, FEEDING/ATTRACTING WILDLIFE PROHIBITION, TO PROHIBIT THE FEEDING OR ATTRACTING OF WILDLIFE WITHIN THE McCALL CITY LIMITS AND PROVIDE PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION.

WHEREAS, the intentional feeding of wildlife can cause animals to congregate in areas hazardous to public safety, such as sidewalks and roadways; and

WHEREAS, the intentional feeding of wildlife can attract an increased number of predators to urban areas, resulting in conflict with humans and domestic animals.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF McCALL, IDAHO:

Section 1: That Section 5.7.010, Definitions, of the McCall City Code is hereby AMENDED as follows, to-wit:

See Exhibit “A” attached hereto and, by this reference, incorporated herein as if set forth in full.

Section 2: That there is hereby ENACTED Section 5.7.400, Feeding/Attracting Wildlife Prohibition, to Chapter 7, Animal Control, Title 5, Public Safety, of the McCall City Code, to- wit: See Exhibit “B” attached hereto and, by this reference, incorporated herein as if set forth in full.

PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF McCALL, IDAHO, THIS __ DAY OF ______2021.

Approved:

By______Robert S. Giles, Mayor Attest:

By______BessieJo Wagner, City Clerk Page 1 of 6 Ord. 1003 Title 5 ______, 2021 EXHIBIT “A”

5.7.010: DEFINITIONS:

As used in this chapter, each of the terms defined has the meaning given in this section unless a different meaning is clearly required by the context. The word "shall" is mandatory, not directory.

ABUSE: Any case in which an animal has been the victim of intentional or negligent conduct resulting in the animal's bruising, bleeding, malnutrition, dehydration, burns, fractures or breaks of any bones, subdural hematoma, soft tissue swelling, prolonged exposure to the weather elements to the detriment of the animal's health, or death.

ANIMAL: Any organism, other than human being, needing food to maintain and sustain its life and which generally has mobility and a developed central nervous system.

AT LARGE: Off the premises of the owner and not under the control of the owner or person having control or custody either by leash, cord or chain.

ATTRACTING/ATTRACTANT: Any substance, including but not limited to food, garbage, or salt/mineral/protein lick, which draws wildlife (except those birds and squirrels as identified in this Chapter).

BIRDS: Any non-domesticated species belonging to the Order Aves other than Waterfowl and Wild Turkeys.

BITTEN: Seized, pierced, or cut with the teeth or with the jaws, other than when done by a canine puppy less than four (4) months old, in play; and "seized" in this regard means with sufficient force to scratch or bruise, or to pierce, cut or tear clothing.

DEPARTMENT: The McCall police department.

DOG: Either a male or a female member of the biological family Canidae, including Canis familiaris, and including also any other member of that family at any time owned, possessed or harbored, whether neutered or spayed.

DOMESTIC ANIMAL: An animal of a species of vertebrates that has been domesticated by humans so as to live and breed in a tame condition and depend on humankind for survival.

EDIBLE MATERIAL: Any human or animal food, food bi-product, salt/mineral/protein lick, organic material, refuse, or garbage.

ENCLOSURE: A fence or structure of at least six feet (6') in height, forming or causing containment suitable to prevent the unauthorized entry of a person and suitable to confine an animal in conjunction with other measures which may be taken by the owner, such as tethering of the animal. Such enclosure shall be securely enclosed and locked and designed with secure sides, top and bottom and shall be designed to prevent the animal from escaping. Page 2 of 6 Ord. 1003 Title 5 ______, 2021 FEEDING/FEED: A substance composed of grain, mineral, protein, salt, fruit, vegetable, hay, or any other food material or combination of these edible materials, whether natural or manufactured, tended, deposited, or distributed in an area frequented and consumed by wildlife (except those birds and squirrels as identified in this Chapter).

FIERCE OR DANGEROUS DOG: A dog (other than a dog belonging to a law enforcement agency and acting pursuant to direction of its law enforcement handler) as described below: (A) Fierce: Any dog which bites, inflicts injury, assaults or otherwise attacks a human being or domestic animal without provocation; for purposes of this definition, it is not justification that the human being when bitten was interfering with the dog's attack upon another human being or animal, or has menaced a human being which human being was not on the property of the dog's owner; (B) Dangerous Dog: A dog, which was previously declared a "threatening dog" and has displayed repeated violations of potentially dangerous behaviors including, but not limited to, a known propensity, tendency or disposition to attack unprovoked, to cause injury or to otherwise endanger the safety of human beings or domestic animal without provocation. Notwithstanding the definition of "fierce or dangerous dog" herein, no dog may be declared fierce or dangerous if an injury or damage is sustained by a person who, at the time such injury or damage was sustained, was committing a wilful trespass or other tort upon the premises occupied by the owner of the dog, or was teasing, tormenting, abusing or assaulting the dog or was committing or attempting to commit a crime. No dog may be declared fierce or dangerous if the dog was protecting or defending a human being within the immediate vicinity of the dog from an unjustified battery or assault.

HABITUATED: Any wildlife relatively accustomed to eating, resting, birthing, defecating, and otherwise living within city limits - outside of their normally wild habitat. Habituated wildlife may actually cease exhibiting some typical behaviors for that species (e.g. resident deer which do not migrate, mountain lions which den under human structures like porches, etc.).

IMPOUNDED: Taken into the custody of the department's city pound animal shelter.

MENACE: The threat of harm, confinement or personal injury of a human by an animal.

MISUSE: The intentional causing of an animal to perform a noncustomary task, which could be dangerous or harmful to the animal.

NUISANCE DOG: A dog which barks or creates noise in an excessive, continuous or untimely manner, molests passersby, chases vehicles, habitually attacks other domestic animals, or trespasses upon public or private property in such a manner as to damage the property.

OWNER: Any person owning, possessing, harboring, caring for or having any custodial duties over any dog in his or her control within the city. "Own" means owning, possessing, harboring, caring for, or having in his or her custodial control.

PRIVATE PROPERTY OPEN TO ENFORCEMENT: Includes private property open to the public; condominium or planned unit development (PUD) common area; condominium limited Page 3 of 6 Ord. 1003 Title 5 ______, 2021 common area which is not reserved for the use of the owner; the common use areas of a mobile home park, or travel trailer court or park; and any other premises with respect to which a person with a right of possession superior to the owner's has invited the department to attend to a matter involving an owner's dog.

PUBLIC EMPLOYEE: Any State or City Employee or certified Peace Officer appointed to carry out and enforce each entity's respective laws and/or ordinances.

RESIDENT: An individual who has their primary residence within the McCall city limits.

SQUIRRELS: Any of the commonly found squirrel species (native or non-native) within McCall City limits which are typically associated with native habitats or urban landscapes. E.g., Red Squirrel, Eastern Fox Squirrel, Eastern Gray Squirrel, Chipmunks etc.

THREATENING DOG: A dog, while at large found to menace, chase, display aggressive behavior, or require defensive action by any person to prevent or discourage bodily injury; any dog which unprovoked, has killed, inflicted injury or otherwise caused injury by attacking another domestic animal off the property of the owner or keeper of the dog or upon streets, sidewalks or public grounds. Growling or barking or both together are not grounds upon which a dog can be found to be threatening.

WATERFOWL: Any wild or habituated migratory bird species of the taxonomic Order Anseriformes, Family Anatidae (ducks, geese, swans).

WILD TURKEY: Those species or subspecies of turkey as identified in the Upland Game, Furbearer, and Turkey Seasons and Rules published by the Idaho Department of Fish and Game.

WILDLIFE: Any species of non-domesticated animals as defined in Idaho Code 36-202(g), including, but not limited to: deer, moose, elk, pronghorn, black bear, mountain lion, wolf, coyote, fox, raccoon, skunk, wild turkey, waterfowl, etc. Provided, however, that birds (other than Wild Turkeys and Waterfowl) and squirrels are not considered wildlife under this Chapter.

Page 4 of 6 Ord. 1003 Title 5 ______, 2021 EXHIBIT “B”

5.7.400 FEEDING/ATTRACTING WILDLIFE PROHIBITION

A. It is unlawful for any person to intentionally and knowingly feed or attract wildlife (including habituated wildlife) except birds and squirrels, by placing, depositing, distributing, storing, or scattering food, edible material, garbage, or other attractants, with the intent to lure, attract, entice, or feed wildlife on public or private land within the City of McCall.

B. Exceptions: This ordinance does not apply to:

1. Public employees or their authorized agents acting pursuant to State of Idaho wildlife management plans or acting within the scope of their authority for wildlife management purposes, or carrying out authorized emergency winter feeding operations, or otherwise carrying out authorized baiting, feeding, or trapping activities in accordance with government authorized wildlife management practices. 2. Any authorized facilities/individuals acting pursuant to State of Idaho and City of McCall permits and licenses responsible or charged with the care of wildlife (i.e. rehabilitation facilities, or authorized and licensed wildlife rehabilitators). 3. Edible material located in a residence, closed vehicle, fully enclosed storage structure, or in an enclosed trash container, where the owner or person in charge has taken reasonable measures to restrict access by wildlife. Full compliance with McCall City Code 5.8.050 shall constitute prima facie evidence that reasonable measures have been taken. 4. A person feeding their own domestic animals as allowed by city ordinances, provided that such food is not left in the open for wildlife to access. 5. Seeds, nectar, and other material to attract birds (other than wild turkey and waterfowl) or squirrels in a feeder placed in such a manner as to make it inaccessible to other wildlife. Feeders shall not be placed in locations in which snow accumulation makes it possible for other wildlife to reach the feeder during the winter months. 6. Compost piles that are fully contained and/or made inaccessible to wildlife. 7. Persons who are engaged in a lawful trapping activity allowing edible bait with all appropriate licenses and/or permits from Idaho Department of Fish and Game and according to both State of Idaho and City of McCall rules and regulations for such trapping activity; and activities that include lawful recreational trapping of wildlife and lawful trapping of nuisance wildlife by both the public and authorized agents of the State of Idaho, the City of McCall, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture Wildlife Services. 8. Persons engaged in lawful fishing activities as authorized by the Idaho Department of Fish and Game. 9. Ornamental plants, vegetable gardens, fruit-bearing trees, flower gardens, lawn, naturally growing vegetation (both native and non-native species), native vegetation species intentionally cultivated, and the part of those plants or trees and the fruit/berries that fall to the ground from them.

Page 5 of 6 Ord. 1003 Title 5 ______, 2021 C. Enforcement: A City of McCall Animal Control or Code Enforcement officer, a McCall Police Officer, or any other State of Idaho certified Peace Officer may investigate and issue a warning or citation for a violation of this ordinance.

D. Penalties: Any person found violating this section shall be guilty of an infraction and fined one hundred dollars ($100.00); provided further, that any person who violates this section for a second or subsequent offense within twelve (12) months after a prior violation of this section shall be subject to the general penalty found in section 1.3.1 of this Code.

Page 6 of 6 Ord. 1003 Title 5 ______, 2021 A SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 1003 PASSED BY THE CITY OF McCALL, IDAHO

The principal provisions of the Ordinance:

• Section 5.7.010 adds definitions for Attracting/Attractant, Birds, Edible Material, Feeding/Feed, Habituated, Public Employee, Squirrels, Waterfowl, Wild Turkey, and Wildlife and amends the definition for Impounded;

• Section 5.7.400 prohibits the intentional and knowing feeding or attracting of wildlife within the City of McCall;

The ordinance allows for certain exceptions such as public employees and wildlife management officials acting within the scope of their authority for wildlife management purposes, authorized facilities/individuals acting pursuant to State of Idaho and City of McCall permits and licenses responsible or charged with the care of wildlife, seeds, nectar, and other material to attract birds (other than wild turkeys and waterfowl) or squirrels in a feeder placed in such a manner as to make it inaccessible to other wildlife, compost piles that are fully contained and/or made inaccessible to wildlife, persons who are engaged in lawful trapping or fishing activities, ornamental plants, vegetable or flower gardens and trees, lawn, naturally growing vegetation, and the part of those plants or trees that fall to the ground from them;

provides for the enforcement of the ordinance as an infraction with a penalty of a fine of $100, but another violation within one year is a misdemeanor.

The Ordinance shall take effect upon its passage, approval, and publication according to law.

The full text of the Ordinance is available for review at City Hall and will be provided by the City Clerk to any citizen upon personal request, or can be viewed on the City website at www.mccall.id.us.

Ordinance 1003 Summary ______, ______APPROVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF McCall, IDAHO, THIS _____ DAY OF ______, 2021.

Approved:

By Robert Giles, Mayor

ATTEST:

By BessieJo Wagner, City Clerk

Ordinance 1003 Summary ______, ______BLANK PAGE McCALL CITY COUNCIL 216 East Park Street AGENDA BILL McCall, Idaho 83638 Number AB 21-191 Meeting Date July 22, 2021

AGENDA ITEM INFORMATION SUBJECT: Originator Department Approvals Initials or Supporter Request Approval of the ROS-20-03 Warranty Mayor / Council Deed for Right of Way Dedication City Manager Clerk Treasurer Community Development BP Originator Police Department Public Works Golf Course COST IMPACT: N/A Parks and Recreation FUNDING N/A Airport SOURCE: Library TIMELINE: Immediate Information Systems Grant Coordinator SUMMARY STATEMENT: The Conditions of Approval associated with ROS-20-03 include dedicating additional right-of-way for Deinhard Lane and Jacob Street adjacent to the subject property. The site is located adjacent to both Deinhard Lane and Jacob Street between Commerce Street and Valley Springs Road. The City Attorney has reviewed the draft deed.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve the ROS-20-03 Warranty Deed for Right of Way Dedication and authorize the Mayor to sign all necessary documents. RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE ACTION

WARRANTY DEED AND ACCEPTANCE [Additional Right-of-Way]

Parties: City of McCall, Idaho Grantee 216 East Park Street, McCall, ID 83638 DEINHARD PROPERTIES, LLC, an Grantor PO Box 236, Santa Ysabel, CA 92070 Idaho limited liability company

This Warranty Deed and Acceptance [Additional Right-of-Way] is made by and between the Grantor herein, DEINHARD PROPERTIES, LLC, an Idaho limited liability company, whose address is PO Box 236, Santa Ysabel, CA 92070, and the CITY OF McCALL, IDAHO, a municipal corporation of the State of Idaho, whose current address is 216 East Park Street, McCall, ID 83638, "Grantee" herein, effective as of the date signed by all parties below. IT IS AGREED, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL COVENANTS CONTAINED IN THIS WARRANTY DEED AND ACCEPTANCE [ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY], AND OTHER GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION: Section 1: Definitions 1.1 Grantor: means and refers to DEINHARD PROPERTIES, LLC, an Idaho limited liability company, Grantor herein and parties to this Warranty Deed and Acceptance [Additional Right-of-Way]. 1.2 Grantee: means and refers to the City of McCall, Idaho, a municipal corporation of the State of Idaho, Grantee herein and party to this Warranty Deed and Acceptance [Additional Right-of-Way]. 1.3 Real Property: means that certain real property more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto and, by this reference, incorporated herein as if set forth in full. Section 2: Recitals The Parties recite and declare: 2.1 Grantor is the owner of the Real Property; and 2.2 Grantee has determined the Real Property is desirable and necessary to expand the Deinhard Lane and Jacob Street right of ways; and 2.3 Grantor has agreed to dedicate the Real Property to Grantee for the purpose of providing additional right-of-way to Grantee for Deinhard Lane and Jacob Street. Section 3: Warranty Deed Grant and Conveyance of Real Property 3.1 Grantor has granted, bargained, and sold, and, by this deed, does grant, bargain, sell, convey, and confirm to Grantee, and its successors and assigns forever, from the effective date hereof the Real Property herein described.

Warranty Deed and Acceptance - 1 Section 3: Warranty Deed Grant and Conveyance of Real Property 3.l Grantor has granted, bargained, and sold, and, by this deed, does grant, bargain, sell, convey, and confirm to Grantee, and its successors and assigns forever, from the effective date hereof the Real Property herein described. 3.2 Grantor covenants to Grantee that Grantor is the owner in fee simple of the Real Property; that the Real Property is free from all monetary encumbrances, and that Grantor will warrant and defend the same from all lawful claims. Section 4: Acceptance of Warranty Deed and Conveyance 4.1 Grantee does hereby accept this Warranty Deed Grant and Conveyance of the Real Property herein provided for in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Warranty Deed and Acceptance [Additional Right-of-Way]. IN WITNESS WHEREOJ<', this Warranty Deed and Acceptance [Additional Right-of Way] has been executed effective as of the date signed by all parties below, with the intent that it shall be recorded in the office of the recorder of the County of Valley, State of Idaho. DEINHARD PROPERTIES, LLC

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

State of California

:::~~~;ji~~~ \-~ ~ before~:. ~ow\LA1 °" ~I (0. )/0 r0if i (1101-a( personally appeared KATHLEEN HAYDEN, who ptdved to me on the basis of satisfatt y evidence to be the person(SJwhose nameks) is/ttre subscribed to the within instrument and / acknowledged to me that-he/shc/iliey-executed the same in-H+6/her/t+rcif...authorized capacityµcs), and that by ms/her.ft!Jrir signature(s)on the instrument the personfsf, or the entity upon bchal f of which the person~ acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal. ' l r j r I t I I. l i············(ROWLYl,Dii JILLE MOREITI : ~·..... Notary Public • Catiforn. ia 2 s igna,u,e (Seal) i · .· San Diego County ! ~-PMi ;1J1l })atH"L Commiuion ~ 219227S I' ; I I V I : My Comm. Expir!S Apr 17, 2021 I j

Warranty Deed and Acceptance - 2 CITY OF McCALL, IDAHO

By: ______Bob Giles, Mayor

ATTEST:

BessieJo Wagner, City Clerk

STA TE OF IDAHO ) :ss. County of Valley )

On this __ day of , 2021, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said state, personally appeared BOB GILES and BESSIE JO WAGNER, the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the CITY OF McCALL, IDAHO, known or identified to me to be the persons who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed the same on behalf of the City of McCall, Idaho, and were authorized to do so.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written.

Notary Public for Idaho My Commission Expires: ______

Warranty Deed and Acceptance - 3 EXHIBIT A Legal Description of Real Property

Warranty Deed and Acceptance SKIFTUN LAND SURVEYING, INC. LOTS -BOUNDARY - TOPOGRAPHY -ALTA SUBDIVISIONS - CONSTRUCTION - FLOOD DATA Working hard to protect your property investment!

May 17, 2020 Page l of 1

DEINHARJ) PROPERTIES, LLC TO CITY OF McCALL Right-of-Way Parcel - Dcinhard Lane Situate in the NWl/4 SEl/4, Section 16, T. 18 N., R. 3 E., B.M., City of McCall, Valley County, Idaho 0.234 Acres

A parcel of land situate in the NWl/4 of the SEl/4, of Section 16, T. 18 N., R. 3 E., B.M., Valley County, Idaho, being a portion of Deinhard Lane, more particularly described as follows:

Commencing at an aluminum cap marking the CE I/16th Comer of Section 16, T. 18 N., R. 3 E., B.M., Valley County, Idaho, as shown on that particular Record of Survey, recorded as Instrument No. 402146, in Book 13, on Page 50 of Surveys, in the Office of the Recorder of Valley County, Idaho, the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING:

Thence, S. 0°06' 18" E., 30.00 feet to a 5/8" rebar on the southerly right-of-way of Deinhard Lane, as shown on that particular Record of Survey, recorded as Instrument No. 324164, in Book I 0, on Page 30 of Surveys, in the Office of the Recorder of Valley County, Idaho, Thence, N. 89°49' 11" W., 339. 71 feet along said southerly right-of-way to a 5/8" rebar marking the Northeast Comer of Lot 4, Payette Lakes Commercial Center, as shown on the official plat thereof recorded as Instrument No. 192960, on file in Book 8, on Page 28 of Plats, in the Office of the Recorder of Valley County, Idaho, Thence, N. 0°37'41" E., 30.00 feet to the northerly boundary of said NWI/4 of the SEl/4, Thence, S. 89°49' 11" E., 339.33 feet along said northerly boundary, to the Point of Beginning, containing 0.234 acres, more or less.

Bearings based on GPS derived State Plane Grid Azimuth, Idaho West Zone.

Rod M. Skiftun - P.L.S. 9585 13784 Highway 55 McCall, ID 83638 9585 208-634-3696/Fax 208-634-8475 E-mail: [email protected] SK1F1'UN LAND SURVEYING, INC. LOTS -BOUNDARY - TOPOGRAPHY -ALTA SUBDIVISIONS - CONSTRUCTION - FLOOD DATA Working hard to protect your property investment!

May 17, 2020 Page 1 of 1

DEINHARD PROPERTIES, LLC TO CITY OF McCALL Right-of-Way Parcel - Jacob Street Situate in the NWl/4 SEl/4, Section 16, T. 18 N., R. 3 E., R.M., City of McCall, Valley County, Idaho 0.273 Acres

A parcel of land situate in the NWl/4 of the SEl/4, of Section 16, T. 18 N., R. 3 E., B.M., Valley County, Idaho, being a portion of Jacob Street, more particularly described as follows:

1 Commencing at a 5/8" re bar marking the SE 1/16 h Comer of Section 16, T. 18 N., R. 3 E., B.M., Valley County, Idaho, as shown on that particular Record of Survey, recorded as Instrument No. 324164, in Book 10, on Page 30 of Surveys, in the Office of the Recorder of Valley County, Idaho, the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING:

Thence, N. 89°37'44" W., 339.54 feet along the southerly boundary of said NWl/4 of the SEl/4, Thence, N. 0°37'4 l" E., 35.00 feet to a 5/8" rebar on the northerly right-of-way of Jacob Street, marking the Southeast Comer of Lot 19, Payette Lakes Commercial Center, as shown on the official plat thereof recorded as Instrument No. 192960, on file in Book 8, on Page 28 of Plats, in the Office of the Recorder of Valley County, Idaho, Thence, S. 89°37'44" E., 339.54 feet to a 5/8" rebar on the westerly boundary of Parcel I, Spring Valley Apartments, as shown on that particular Record of Survey, recorded as Instmment No. 352590, on file in Book l 1, on Page 83 of Surveys, Thence, S. 0°38'08" W., 35.00 feet, to the Point of Beginning, containing 0.273 Acres, more or less.

Bearings based on GPS derived State Plane Grid Azimuth, Idaho West Zone.

Rod M. Skiftun - P.L.S. 9585 13784 Highway 55 McCall, ID 83638 9585 208-634-3696/Fax 208-634-8475 E-mail: [email protected] BLANK PAGE McCALL CITY COUNCIL 216 East Park Street AGENDA BILL McCall, Idaho 83638 Number AB 21-195 Meeting Date July 22, 2021

AGENDA ITEM INFORMATION SUBJECT: Originator Department Approvals Initials or Supporter Mayor and Council Compensation Discussion and Mayor / Council Direction to Staff City Manager Clerk Originator Treasurer Community Development Police Department Public Works Golf Course COST IMPACT: Parks and Recreation FUNDING Airport SOURCE: Library TIMELINE: Information Systems Grant Coordinator SUMMARY STATEMENT: Idaho Code 50-203 states that the officials of each city compensation are to be fixed by ordinance published at least seventy-five (75) days before any general city election. The ordinance shall be effective for all said officials commencing on January 1 following said election and continuing until changed by a future ordinance. At the May 28th FY22 Budget Work Session, staff presented the to the Council the current monthly salary for a City Council Member is $250 and $400 for the Mayor, which were adopted in 2019. City Council Members and the Mayor also receive all benefits afforded to regular full time employees of the City of McCall as described in the annual "Employee Benefits Guide" including Idaho PERSI retirement benefits. Council requested additional information regarding the salaries of other elected officials in other cities. Attached is the 2019 AIC Elected Officials Salary Survey, the survey reflects the current estimated populations, but the salaries are from the 2019 survey. AIC is currently conducting an additional survey for 2021 but it will not be available until after July 29th.

Staff is requesting that the Council review the salaries and the 2019 salary survey and decide whether to direct staff to prepare an ordinance with a change in salaries or decide to leave the salaries as they are.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Direction to staff RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE ACTION

Similar Cities Comparison

City Population Mayor's Salary Councilor's Salary Benefits Other

Kellogg 2155 500 200 PERSI none Victor 2388 1000 250 medical only phone stipend for mayor only Iona 2515 500 200 PERSI none Bonners Ferry 2673 600 300 PERSI, Med/Life none Spirit Lake 2811 500 50 PERSI none Ketchum 2889 3121.17 1734 PERSI, M/D/V certain travel/meeting expenses Orofino 3100 700 500 PERSI none Soda Springs 3122 950 640 PERSI, M/D/V, Life, travel, food & lodging for trainings & HAS meetings out of town Grangeville 3256 350 150 PERSI travel costs Gooding 3449 800 600 PERSI none Heyburn 3579 1300 390 PERSI / vision none McCall 3684 400 250 PERSI, M/D/V Travel and meetings Kimberly 4196 750 500 PERSI Ipad Rigby 4241 1000 300 none none American Falls 4291 1300 300 PERSI, M/D/V none Buhl 4499 733.33 366.67 PERSI, M/D/V/Life none Weiser 5391 645 400 PERSI, M/D/V none Preston 5575 1300 800 PERSI, M/D/V/Life none Fruitland 5580 1000 550 PERSI none Hailey 8749 2000 850 PERSI / life flight none Sandpoint 9523 1200 400 PERSI, M/D/V/Life phone plus svc fee, travel Rathdrum 9550 1550 808 PERSI none Burley 10661 1500 400 PERSI, Med/Life none 2019 Council/ Mayor Salary Survey

Warm River 3 Clayton 10 Drummond 21 Spencer 32 State Line 49 Oxford 58 Placerville 59 0 0 none none Reubens 65 0 0 none none Butte City 67 Stanley 71 White Bird 94 0 25 none none Hope 100 Hamer 109 Leadore 109 Huetter 113 Minidoka 113 Acequia 123 150 80 none none Elk River 123 100 50 none mileage stipend Tensed 123 10 10 none $25 towards mayor cell phone Midvale 156 St. Charles 160 300 100 PERSI none Ferdinand 165 50 30 none none Fernan Lake 171 Moore 173 Wardner 182 0 0 none none Crouch 190 Onaway 194 Peck 202 20 15 none none Malta 203 Murtaugh 206 250 100 none none Oldtown 206 Bloomington 217 Harrison 219 500 75 none none Donnelly 220 400 300 PERSI none Stites 229 60 50 none $10 per special meeting East Hope 230 0 0 none none Swan Valley 243 Irwin 249 Castleford 252 100 100 PERSI none Worley 261 Bovill 262 90 75 PERSI none Island Park 275 no data 130 PERSI none Tetonia 280 no data 55 PERSI none Rockland 282 Albion 283 Parker 298 Clifton 301 150 32 none none Hollister 301 Bliss 304 Kendrick 311 Cambridge 319 165 100 PERSI none Newdale 330 238.5 79.5 PERSI none Dietrich 359 0 0 none vehicle, travel/mileage, cell phone, fuel Arimo 369 Declo 373 300 200 PERSI phone for mayor Culdesac 383 0 0 none mileage stipend to trainings Bancroft 400 106.95 64.17 none none Basalt 412 Fairfield 414 700 350 PERSI none Eden 427 200 79 none none Riggins 429 400 100 PERSI none Mud Lake 433 0 0 none none Lava Hot Springs 438 600 250 PERSI none

Page 1 of 4 2019 Council/Mayor Salary Survey

Weippe 438 0 0 none none Nezperce 471 510 150 PERSI, access to join medical plan Paid for extra meetings ($35/half, $70/full Grand View 473 50 50 PERSI none Weston 475 300 225 PERSI $25 per special meeting Winchester 479 10 5 PERSI none Dayton 484 100 50 none none Idaho City 489 400 200 PERSI mileage stipend/conference reimbursements Richfield 500 Craigmont 504 0 0 PERSI $25 plus mileage per meeting attended Georgetown 506 Firth 508 200 50 none none Mackay 520 75 55 PERSI none Deary 534 75 75 PERSI none Paris 538 200 100 PERSI none Melba 543 300 150 PERSI mileage for trips Lewisville 544 300 150 none travel/mileage New Meadows 578 150 100 PERSI none Pierce 582 70 30 none none Clark Fork 596 200 0 PERSI none Dubois 610 Juliaetta 615 Hayden Lake 623 200 100 PERSI travel Smelterville 624 150 75 PERSI none Notus 633 150 50 PERSI none Roberts 638 200 100 PERSI none Downey 640 250 50 PERSI phone for mayor, utilities for Council & Carey 641 0 0 none none Kooskia 675 0 0 PERSI none Ririe 680 Mullan 699 100 30 PERSI none Teton 755 75 25 none none Hauser 761 Moyie Springs 767 95 75 PERSI, medical none Wallace 784 300 50 none none Athol 800 300 125 PERSI, D/V Costco membership, Mayor cell stipend, Horseshoe Bend 802 200 75 PERSI none Oakley 820 100 50 none none Hazelton 826 300 100 PERSI none Potlatch 829 350 200 PERSI none Menan 831 Franklin 834 100 100 PERSI none Dover 850 500 250 PERSI none McCammon 861 650 250 PERSI phone for mayor, travel/lodging as need for Greenleaf 887 Hagerman 888 375 200 PERSI phone/mileage Arco 896 Inkom 911 Troy 914 Cottonwood 947 0 0 PERSI none Grace 952 300 150 PERSI none Council 966 Kootenai 984 500 125 PERSI none Genesee 985 350 200 PERSI phone for mayor only Cascade 1028 1000 350 PERSI none Plummer 1056 150 75 PERSI none Ashton 1070 700 350 PERSI mileage for mayor only Challis 1122 Lapwai 1128 400 100 $100 per meeting for timely & full receive personal property (technology & attendance equipment) not to exceed $2000 in value per term Ucon 1167 300 150 PERSI none Ponderay 1196 900 375 PERSI, M/D/V/Life none Kamiah 1275

Page 2 of 4 2019 Council/Mayor Salary Survey

Hansen 1316 275 165 none none Glenns Ferry 1353 Marsing 1356 600 150 PERSI phone for mayor Sugar City 1375 1200 200 PERSI, M/D/V AIC training mileage, hotel, registration Sun Valley 1499 1750 1000 PERSI, M/D/V, life none New Plymouth 1531 Shoshone 1543 Osburn 1573 Pinehurst 1648 150 100 PERSI none Paul 1673 Driggs 1876 Wilder 1906 250 150 Council Pres; PERSI if eligible none Priest River 1939 800 400 PERSI none Aberdeen 1976 300 150 PERSI none Parma 2148 Kellogg 2155 500 200 PERSI none Malad City 2224 Victor 2388 1000 250 medical only phone stipend for mayor only Dalton Gardens 2441 Bellevue 2484 Iona 2515 500 200 PERSI none St. Maries 2516 Montpelier 2586 Bonners Ferry 2673 600 300 PERSI, Med/Life none Wendell 2709 Spirit Lake 2811 500 50 PERSI none Homedale 2817 Ketchum 2889 3121.17 1734 PERSI, M/D/V certain travel/meeting expenses Filer 2939 Orofino 3100 700 500 PERSI none Soda Springs 3122 950 640 PERSI, M/D/V, Life, HAS travel, food & lodging for trainings & Grangeville 3256 350 150 PERSI travel costs Salmon 3259 Gooding 3449 800 600 PERSI none Heyburn 3579 1300 390 PERSI / vision none St. Anthony 3681 McCall 3684 400 250 PERSI, M/D/V Travel and meetings Kimberly 4196 750 500 PERSI Ipad Rigby 4241 1000 300 none none American Falls 4291 1300 300 PERSI, M/D/V none Buhl 4499 733.33 366.67 PERSI, M/D/V/Life none Shelley 4612 Weiser 5391 645 400 PERSI, M/D/V none Preston 5575 1300 800 PERSI, M/D/V/Life none Fruitland 5580 1000 550 PERSI none Rupert 5803 Emmett 7275 Payette 7683 Middleton 8645 Hailey 8749 2000 850 PERSI / life flight none Sandpoint 9523 1200 400 PERSI, M/D/V/Life phone plus svc fee, travel Rathdrum 9550 1550 808 PERSI none Burley 10661 1500 400 PERSI, Med/Life none Star 11300 Blackfoot 12096 5416.67 500 PERSI, M/D/V/Life none Garden City 12161 2833.34 850 PERSI, M/D/Life phone/mileage for mayor only Jerome 12171 1000 500 PERSI/Workers Comp/ M/D/V/Life, travel Mountain Home 15239 5000 850 PERSI, M/D/V/Life; Mayor also phone & city vehicle with fuel & Chubbuck 15780 4583.3 525 PERSI, M/D/V/Life phone, vehicle Hayden 16012 1320 660 Entitled to Employee benefit offering city business expense reimbursement Ammon 17085 1250 700 PERSI, Medical none Kuna 23290 5166.66 750 PERSI none Moscow 26668

Page 3 of 4 2019 Council/Mayor Salary Survey

Rexburg 29517 6366.66 741.66 PERSI, M/D/Life/accident ipad, travel outside 30 miles, recreation Eagle 30945 6000 1000 Mayor benefits provided - None for Lewiston 33155 770 520 PERSI / Life insurance none Post Falls 38145 Twin Falls 51770 1000 750 100% vested in PERSI after end of cell phone & $410 monthly stipend Coeur d'Alene 52917 2700 1000 PERSI, M/D/V/Life/HRA/VEBA travel Pocatello 57166 6785 887 PERSI, M/D/V/Life, VEBA Community Rec Center membership Caldwell 59809 7418.33 758.16 PERSI, M/D/V/Life mileage Idaho Falls 63543 7166.66 1083.33 PERSI, M/D/V/Life vehicle/phone for mayor Nampa 101410 Meridian 115550 Boise 234576

Page 4 of 4 City Council Upcoming Meetings Schedule

July 23, 2021 – 9:00 a.m. TEAMS Virtual and Legion Hall – Special Work Session – 1. New Employee Introductions 2. Text my Gov (Erin) 3. Wildlife Feeding Ordinance 2nd reading (BessieJo) 5Min

July 29, 2021 – 5:30pm. TEAMS Virtual and Legion Hall – Special Work Session 1. Budget Work Session (Linda) 3 Hours a. Final LOT Allocations decision (BessieJo) b. Set tentative budget

August 5, 2021 – 5:30 pm TEAMS Virtual and Legion Hall – Special Session 1. Council Interviews (BessieJo) 2. Council Deliberation as Committee of the Whole to select a new Council Member – Dependent on how many applications. May be moved to August 12th (BessieJo)

August 12, 2021 - 5:30 pm, TEAMS Virtual and Legion Hall – Regular Meeting 1. Clerk License Report - Consent 2. Chamber Report 3. Monthly Department Reports 4. Committee Minutes - Consent 5. COVID-19 Update – Review Mask Metrics – (Justin) 10Min 6. FY22 Budget Adoption – Public Hearing – (Linda) 30min 7. Request to submit Idaho Commission for Libraries Kindergarten Readiness Grant (Delta) 8. Request to submit Small Rural Tribal Body Worn Camera Grant (Delta) 9. Request to appoint Delta James as City of McCall representative to WCMEDC Board (Delta) 10. Council Deliberation as Committee of the Whole to select a new Council Member If not completed 8/5/21 11. Adopt Library Bond Ordinance (Linda) 12. Wildlife Feeding Ordinance 3rd reading and Adoption (BessieJo) 5Min 13. Housing Advisory Committee Appointment (Michelle) 5 min 14. Utility Easement IDL (Nathan)

August 26, 2021 - 5:30 pm, TEAMS Virtual and Legion Hall – Regular Meeting 1. Work Session: 2. Clerk License Report - Consent 3. Treasurer’s Monthly Report (Linda) - Consent 4. COVID-19 Update – Review Mask Metrics – (Justin) 10Min 5. Parks & Recreation Advisory Committee Annual Report (Kurt) 20 min 6. FY20 Audit Report Eidebailly (Linda) 15Min 7. New Council Member Oath of Office (BessieJo) 8. 9.

August 27, 2021 – 9:00 a.m. TEAMS Virtual and Legion Hall – Special Work Session – 1. Joint meeting with Valley County Board of Commissioners- McCall Impact Area/Future Land Use Plan (Michelle) 1

September 2, 2021 – 5:30 pm TEAMS Virtual and Legion Hall – Special Session Tentative 1.

September 9, 2021 - 5:30 pm, TEAMS Virtual and Legion Hall – Regular Meeting (This Meeting is full. Only consent items can be added 7/9/21) 1. Clerk License Report - Consent 2. Chamber Report 3. Monthly Department Reports 4. Committee Minutes - Consent 5. COVID-19 Update – Review Mask Metrics – (Justin) 10Min 6. CUP-21-01 – 428 Colorado Townhomes (Brian) 60 Min 7. SUB-21-02 – Big Horn Subdivision (Brian) 60 Min

September 23, 2021 - 5:30 pm, TEAMS Virtual and Legion Hall – Regular Meeting 1. Work Session: 2. Clerk License Report - Consent 3. Treasurer’s Monthly Report (Linda) - Consent 4. COVID-19 Update – Review Mask Metrics – (Justin) 10Min 5. Tree Advisory Committee Annual Report (Kurt) 20 min 6.

September 24, 2021 – 9:00 a.m. TEAMS Virtual and Legion Hall – Special Work Session – 1. –

October 7, 2021 - 5:30 pm, TEAMS Virtual and Legion Hall – Regular Meeting 1. Clerk License Report - Consent 2. Chamber Report 3. Monthly Department Reports 4. Committee Minutes - Consent 5. COVID-19 Update – Review Mask Metrics – (Justin) 10Min 6.

October 21, 2021 - 5:30 pm, TEAMS Virtual and Legion Hall – Regular Meeting 1. Work Session: 2. Clerk License Report - Consent 3. Treasurer’s Monthly Report (Linda) - Consent 4. COVID-19 Update – Review Mask Metrics – (Justin) 10Min 5. McCall Redevelopment Agency Annual Report (Michelle) 20 min 6.

October 22, 2021 – 9:00 a.m. TEAMS Virtual and Legion Hall – Special Work Session – – To be Scheduled: 1. MCC Title 6 Re-write (Nathan Stewart) 2. Investment Policy update (Linda) 2