Google Earth 11 Math Activity: Finding the Area of U.S

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Google Earth 11 Math Activity: Finding the Area of U.S All Things Google Welcome to Teq’s latest eBook! Whether you’re brand new to Google’s education tools or are just looking for some extra tips and tricks, this eBook will help you make the most of all things Google in your classroom. Contents Section 1-Search Google Search 1 "Google A Day" Questions 1 Searching with Images 1 Search for Recent Results 2 Section 2-Drive What is Google Drive? 3 Research Tool in Google Docs 4 EasyBib to Google Docs 4 Redefine the Feedback Process with Kaizena 5 Section 3-Forms A Quick Overview of Google Forms 6 3 Ways to Distribute Google Forms 6 Embedding Images in Google Forms 7 5 Fabulous Form Features to Fortify Your Fall Lessons 7 Grading Google Forms with Flubaroo 10 Section 4-Earth Google Earth 11 Math Activity: Finding the Area of U.S. States 12 Creating Virtual Tours with Google Earth 13 teq.com All Things Google 1 Section 1 Search Google Search Did you know you can be more specific when searching with Google? Using search operators (support.google.com/websearch/answer/136861) can help you specify your search terms to get exactly what you need. Check out a few of these examples: Calculate: 12 * 2 returns product and the web calculator Convert: 50 ft to m returns conversion and web convert tool Filetype: add filetype:pdf after search terms to return PDF files Weather: weather New York will return the weather forecast, in this case "New York" Define/Dictionary: define cat will return the definition of the word, in this case "cat" Site-specific search: site:teq.com will return results from a specific site, in this case "teq.com" "A Google A Day" Questions Trying to enhance your students’ research and creative thinking skills? A Google a Day (www.agoogleaday.com) may be able to help. A Google a Day is a daily search puzzle that can be solved using some creativity and clever search skills on Google. Using Google to find the answer is not only allowed—it’s encouraged! A new question is posted everyday, and printed weekdays above The New York Times crossword puzzle. Each day’s puzzle offers search tips and features used to solve the question. These questions are challenging and require the right questions be asked to find the solution. To prevent spoilers from appearing as you search the web, A Google A Day uses a special version of Google, called Deja Google, “[A] wormhole inspired time machine that enables you to solve today's puzzle spoiler free by searching the Internet as it existed before A Google a Day launched.” This way, someone’s recent blog post about finding the answer won’t spoil the fun. Introduce A Google a Day to your students, and watch as they accept the challenge to become more savvy searchers! Searching with Images You’ve probably searched Google Images by typing in some term and scrolling through images to find what you're looking for. But did you know you can search Google Images with a picture you already have? Simply navigate to Google Images (images.google.com), and drag and drop an image file into the search bar. Google will do its best to find a match. Wondering how this can enhance your class? What about a local biology exploration? Have your students investigate plants around the school or at home, and snap a picture of the plants in the area. Back in the classroom, they can use Google to identify the plants and begin their research. teq.com All Things Google 2 Search for Recent Results The last thing a teacher wants is for students to use old sources when newer information is available. The solution is to attach a few characters to the end of a Google search URL. To restrict your search to the last 10 years, insert the character string &as_qdr=y10 at the end of the web address. You will also get the date that each search result was published. Using this tip allows your students to know how current their search results are. Modify your search to any length of time by changing the number after the letter “Y” in the character string. teq.com All Things Google 3 Section 2 Google Drive What is Google Drive? Teq's Top 10 Google Drive is a cloud-based storage, sharing, and collaboration solution that allows you to Reasons to Use access word processing files, spreadsheets, presentations, drawings, and more through a browser on any web-enabled device. Google Drive Google Drive eliminates the need for email and Apps for attachments. With Drive, you can instantly share files or folders from any device. Once you’ve shared that file, you and your students will be able Education to collaborate on the file in real time. To fully-utilize Google Drive, you’ll need to create 10. It's easy to use! a free account. Already using Gmail? Great! You’re 9. Reduces printing costs by enabling good-to-go. If you’re using a different email a more “paperless” classroom. provider, you can use your existing email address to create your Google account. Either way, it’s free, 8. No need to install or update and with it you’ll get 15GB of storage for all your software—EVER. files, mail, photos, and videos. 7. Eliminates email attachments and file versions. Google Drive provides students and teachers with an easy way to collaborate -- a key 21st century 6. Auto-save feature and cloud access skill. It allows for continuous feedback throughout helps “forgetful” students and teachers. the creation process. It’s no longer write, turn in, 5. Mobile device-friendly! Students wait, review, and revise. With Drive, the entire without Internet access at home can process is transparent and collaborative—from download files for offline editing, brainstorming to the final draft. then sync changes when they’re back at school. 4. Extensions help provide accessibility for students with special needs. 3. Supports all phases of the writing process, with 24/7 access to revisions and real-time chat support options. 2. Supports key career and college- readiness skill development— communication, collaboration, and project management. 1. It’s FREE! teq.com All Things Google 4 Research Tool in Google Docs Looking for information about the Common Core Standards? Students writing their final research papers for your class? Google Doc’s Research panel can help you and your students search for anything on the web, including images (which can be filtered by specific usage rights), and quotes. Simply highlight the word or phrase you’d like to research, right-click, and select the research option. The research panel will open to the right of your document. Users can choose to preview (or open) the link, insert a hyperlink into a document, or create a citation to the source, straight from your results list within the research tool. This tool will create a footnote citation for a source in just one click. EasyBib to Google Docs One of the anchor standards of the Writing strand of the Common Core Standards (www.corestandards.org/ELA- Literacy/CCRA/W) is Research to Build and Present Knowledge, which means that research papers will most likely find their way into your curriculum. However, many students tend to struggle with the process of collecting and citing their research properly. Enter EasyBib (www.easybib.com) — a website that quickly creates citations using different styles for a variety of media. EasyBib is an excellent classroom tool because • It’s easy to use. Type in a search term and the results are listed on the page. A menu on the left side of the page will list source categories such as web sites, journal articles, and online databases, and show the number of results for each. • It understands a variety of sources. In addition to the source menu, you’ll be able to click on tabs that will sort the results by academic, online, or all sources. • Its ability to create citations. Once you’ve explored a source, you can return to the search results and click on the Cite It button. This will create your citation and place it in a bibliography. • It easily integrates with Google Docs. Click on the Save to Google Docs button at the top of your bibliography list. When you do this, you’ll be prompted to grant access to EasyBib from Google Docs. Alternatively, there is a dropdown at the top of your bibliography list that will allow you to check only certain citations that will be exported to your Google Docs account. Using either method, you’ll be able to create your research report, and if you’re working collaboratively, you can invite others to add to your Google Doc. We recommend waiting until all your sources are gathered before exporting your citations. teq.com All Things Google 5 Redefine the Feedback Process with Kaizena Back in May, we posted about improving feedback with an app for Google Drive called Voice Comments. Since its release, this useful tool has helped educators provide more personalized and meaningful feedback to students in their Google Documents. Rather than having to navigate through a sea of red ink, or click through and read comment after comment, the Voice Comments app took the entire feedback process and turned it into a conversational review. Thus, the process of providing feedback was made more efficient, and the experience of receiving feedback was more engaging. To say that the creators of Voice Comments (formerly 121writing.com, now Kaizena) take feedback very seriously is an understatement, for sure.
Recommended publications
  • “The Hype Vs. Reality Vs. What People Value: Emerging Collaborative News Models and the Future of News”
    “The Hype vs. Reality vs. What People Value: Emerging Collaborative News Models and the Future of News” Hsing Wei – Spring 2006 KSG Harvard Masters Project This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.5 License Table of Contents An Introduction ..……………………………………………………….... 2 - Study Components ……………………………………………….. 3 - The Limitations of Popular Anecdotes …………...……………… 4 Part I: What’s Out There? Mapping A Corner of The Landscape ……….. 6 - Backing Up: Understanding the Context ………………………… 6 - Circling Back: Some Definitions ………………………………… 8 - Developing a Conceptual Framework …………………………… 10 - Features Structuring Participation & Production ………………… 12 - Features Structuring Community ………………………………… 14 - Strategies From the Real World: A Bit More on Why Communities Matter …………………………………………………………….. 17 - Identifying What is Distinct in a Model …………………………. 18 Part II: What Do They Think? Surveying the Community ………………. 19 - Methodology ………………………………………………………. 19 - Summary of Survey Results ………………………………….…… 21 o Demographics …………………………………………….. 22 o How committed are they: Notes on usage behavior ………. 22 o How do they seek …………………………………………. 24 o Why do they seek: Primary uses ………………………….. 24 o Trading off: What do users most value ……………………. 26 o Credibility ………………………………………………… 28 o On Aesthetics ……………………………………………… 28 o Do they make friends: Extent a politicizing force ………... 29 o Motivations for contributing to content …………………… 30 o Sources of information …………………………………… o Barriers to contributing: Reasons for not writing content or 32 posting comments ………………………………………….. 32 o Perception of challenges …………………………………… 34 o Perceived strengths over MSM ……………………………. 37 A Discussion of Implications: Tying it all Together ……………………… 42 - What is Natural and What can be Built ………………………….. 44 - Their Side of the Story: Summarizing …………………………….. 48 Appendix and References ………………………………………………... 53 A Big Thank You! To all those involved with these websites who took time to give their opinions, thoughts, and advice.
    [Show full text]
  • Disinformation and Propaganda – Impact on the Functioning of the Rule of Law in the EU and Its Member States
    STUDY Requested by the LIBE committee Disinformation and propaganda – impact on the functioning of the rule of law in the EU and its Member States Policy Department for Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs Directorate General for Internal Policies of the Union PE 608.864 - February 2019 EN Disinformation and propaganda – impact on the functioning of the rule of law in the EU and its Member States STUDY Abstract This study, commissioned by the European Parliament’s Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs and requested by the European Parliament’s Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, assesses the impact of disinformation and strategic political propaganda disseminated through online social media sites. It examines effects on the functioning of the rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights in the EU and its Member States. The study formulates recommendations on how to tackle this threat to human rights, democracy and the rule of law. It specifically addresses the role of social media platform providers in this regard. ABOUT THE PUBLICATION This research paper was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (LIBE) and was commissioned, overseen and published by the Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs. Policy Departments provide independent expertise, both in-house and externally, to support European Parliament committees and other parliamentary bodies in shaping legislation and exercising democratic scrutiny
    [Show full text]
  • Journalists' Use of Newspaper Comment Sections in the Newsgathering Process
    JOURNALISTS’ USE OF NEWSPAPER COMMENT SECTIONS IN THE NEWSGATHERING PROCESS ______________________________________________ A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School University of Missouri ______________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts ______________________________________________ By Lisa R. Brown Dr. Tim P. Vos, Thesis Committee Chair December 2018 The undersigned, appointed by the Dean of the Graduate School, have examined the thesis entitled: JOURNALISTS’ USE OF NEWSPAPER COMMENT SECTIONS IN THE NEWSGATHERING PROCESS Presented by Lisa R. Brown A candidate for the degree of Master of Arts And hereby certify that in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. _____________________________ Professor Tim P. Vos _____________________________ Professor Margaret Duffy _____________________________ Professor Clintin Stober _____________________________ Professor Amy Simons ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am grateful for the guidance of my Thesis Committee Chair, Professor Tim Vos, and committee members, Professor Margaret Duffy, Professor Clintin Stober and Professor Amy Simons. I also owe a great deal of gratitude to the previous program advisor, Sarah Smith- Frigerio and her successor, Kathy Appuhn-Hodges. I thank my family for their support during my graduate studies, especially my father, Bill Brown, who inspired me to always continue learning. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ii Abstract v Chapter I Introduction 1 Chapter II Literature Review 7 Gatekeeping
    [Show full text]
  • Online Participatory Media and International News
    The Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy Working Paper Series THE WORLD-WIDE CONVERSATION: Online participatory media and international news By Rebecca MacKinnon Shorenstein Fellow, Spring 2004 #2004-2 Copyright © 2004, President and Fellows of Harvard College All rights reserved THE WORLD-WIDE CONVERSATION Online participatory media and international news By Rebecca MacKinnon Prologue This paper marks the beginning of a personal quest. After working for CNN in Asia for over a decade, I stopped to take stock. I asked myself: Did my job as a TV news correspondent remain consistent with the reasons I went into journalism in the first place? My answer was “no.” When I decided to pursue a journalism career at the age of 21, naturally I did not want to work for free. But my primary reasons for wanting to become a foreign correspondent were idealistic and public-service oriented. I believed that a democratic nation such as the United States could only have responsible foreign policies that truly served the people’s interests – and intentions – if the public received quality, objective international news. I wanted to make a difference. To say that I made no difference covering China, Japan, Korea, and other parts of Asia to viewers in the United States and around the world would be overly cynical. But by early 2004 I concluded that my ability to make a difference on issues that I felt were important was diminishing. In November 2003 I interviewed Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi, focusing primarily on his decision to send Japanese non-combat forces to Iraq despite widespread public opposition.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Is Addressed in This Comment? Automatically Classifying Meta-Comments in News Comments
    Who is Addressed in this Comment? Automatically Classifying Meta-Comments in News Comments MARLO HÄRING, University of Hamburg, Germany WIEBKE LOOSEN, Hans-Bredow-Institute, Germany WALID MAALEJ, University of Hamburg, Germany User comments have become an essential part of online journalism. However, newsrooms are often over- whelmed by the vast number of diverse comments, for which a manual analysis is barely feasible. Identifying meta-comments that address or mention newsrooms, individual journalists, or moderators and that may call for reactions is particularly critical. In this paper, we present an automated approach to identify and classify meta-comments. We compare comment classification based on manually extracted features with an end-to-end learning approach. We develop, optimize, and evaluate multiple classifiers on a comment dataset of 67 the large German online newsroom SPIEGEL Online and the “One Million Posts” corpus of DER STANDARD, an Austrian newspaper. Both optimized classification approaches achieved encouraging F0:5 values between 76% and 91%. We report on the most significant classification features with the results of a qualitative analysis and discuss how our work contributes to making participation in online journalism more constructive. CCS Concepts: • Information systems → Content analysis and feature selection; • Human-centered computing → Social media; • Computing methodologies → Supervised learning by classification; Neural networks; Cross-validation; Additional Key Words and Phrases: user comments; computational journalism; algorithmic classification; end-to-end machine learning; word embeddings ACM Reference Format: Marlo Häring, Wiebke Loosen, and Walid Maalej. 2018. Who is Addressed in this Comment? Automatically Classifying Meta-Comments in News Comments. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW, Article 67 (November 2018), 20 pages.
    [Show full text]
  • Expanding Employee Protections
    THE HARMS OF RACIST ONLINE HATE SPEECH IN THE POST-COVID WORKING WORLD: EXPANDING EMPLOYEE PROTECTIONS Tatiana Hyman* In one year, the COVID-19 pandemic and egregious incidents of racial violence have created significant shifts in the United States’s workplace culture and social climate. Many employers are transitioning employees to long-term or permanent remote work, and conversations about racial justice are more pervasive and divisive, especially on social media. With people spending more time at home and on the internet, hate speech has increased and inspired global conversations about curtailing its harmful effects. Unlike many other countries, the United States does not penalize hate speech. Nevertheless, its harmful effects have reached the workplace, and employers have fired employees who posted offensive speech on their personal social media pages. Penalizing racist or offensive social media posts is left to employers’ discretion, resulting in inconsistent court rulings. More specifically, some courts have found conduct outside of the workplace and on social media to be actionable in workplace harassment claims while others have not. This Note proposes that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission should expand its guidelines to state that courts should consider racist hate speech on an employee’s personal social media page in the totality of the circumstances in Title VII hostile work environment claims. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................ 1554 I. THE HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL MEDIA HATE SPEECH PROTECTIONS .......................................................... 1561 A. Development of the Hostile Work Environment Claim ... 1561 B. Employer Liability for Harassment Claims .................... 1565 C. Tension Between Racial Harassment Claims and Sexual Harassment Jurisprudence ........................................... 1566 * J.D. Candidate, 2022, Fordham University School of Law; B.A., 2017, University of Pennsylvania.
    [Show full text]