DOCSLIB.ORG

3Rd Workshop on Linked Data in Linguistics: Multilingual Knowledge Resources and Natural Language Processing, Reykjavik, Iceland, 27 May 2014 - 27 May 2014, 55-60

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
3Rd Workshop on Linked Data in Linguistics: Multilingual Knowledge Resources and Natural Language Processing, Reykjavik, Iceland, 27 May 2014 - 27 May 2014, 55-60 Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2014 Typology with Graphs and Matrices Moran, Steven ; Cysouw, Michael Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-103786 Conference or Workshop Item Originally published at: Moran, Steven; Cysouw, Michael (2014). Typology with Graphs and Matrices. In: 3rd Workshop on Linked Data in Linguistics: Multilingual Knowledge Resources and Natural Language Processing, Reykjavik, Iceland, 27 May 2014 - 27 May 2014, 55-60. 3rd Workshop on Linked Data in Linguistics: Multilingual Knowledge Resources and Natural Language Processing Workshop Programme 08:30 - 09:00 – Opening and Introduction by Workshop Chair(s) 09:00 – 10:00 – Invited Talk Piek Vossen, The Collaborative Inter-Lingual-Index for harmonizing wordnets 10:00 – 10:30 – Session 1: Modeling Lexical-Semantic Resources with lemon Andon Tchechmedjiev, Gilles Sérasset, Jérôme Goulian and Didier Schwab, Attaching Translations to Proper Lexical Senses in DBnary 10:30 – 11:00 Coffee break 11:00-11:20– Session 1: Modeling Lexical-Semantic Resources with lemon John Philip McCrae, Christiane Fellbaum and Philipp Cimiano, Publishing and Linking WordNet using lemon and RDF 11:20-11:40– Session 1: Modeling Lexical-Semantic Resources with lemon Andrey Kutuzov and Maxim Ionov, Releasing genre keywords of Russian movie descriptions as Linguistic Linked Open Data: an experience report 11:40-12:00– Session 2: Metadata Matej Durco and Menzo Windhouwer, From CLARIN Component Metadata to Linked Open Data 12:00-12:20– Session 2: Metadata Gary Lefman, David Lewis and Felix Sasaki, A Brief Survey of Multimedia Annotation Localisation on the Web of Linked Data 12:20-12:50– Session 2: Metadata Daniel Jettka, Karim Kuropka, Cristina Vertan and Heike Zinsmeister, Towards a Linked Open Data Representation of a Grammar Terms Index 12:50-13:00 – Poster slam – Data Challenge 13:00 – 14:00 Lunch break 14:00 – 15:00 – Invited Talk Gerard de Mello, From Linked Data to Tightly Integrated Data 15:00 – 15:30 – Section 3: Crosslinguistic Studies Christian Chiarcos and Maria Sukhareva, Linking Etymological Databases. A case study in Germanic i 15:30 – 16:00 – Section 3: Crosslinguistic Studies Fahad Khan, Federico Boschetti and Francesca Frontini, Using lemon to Model Lexical Semantic Shift in Diachronic Lexical Resources 16:00 – 16:30 Coffee break 16:30 – 17:00 – Section 3: Crosslinguistic Studies Steven Moran and Michael Cysouw, Typology with graphs and matrices 17:00 – 17:30 – Section 3: Crosslinguistic Studies Robert Forkel, The Cross-Linguistic Linked Data project 17:30 – 18:30 – Poster Session – Data Challenge Gilles Sérasset and Andon Tchechmedjiev, Dbnary: Wiktionary as Linked Data for 12 Language Editions with Enhanced Translation Relations Maud Ehrmann, Francesco Cecconi, Daniele Vannella, John Philip McCrae, Philipp Cimiano and Roberto Navigli, A Multilingual Semantic Network as Linked Data: lemon-BabelNet Gabriela Vulcu, Raul Lario Monje, Mario Munoz, Paul Buitelaar and Carlos A. Iglesias, Linked- Data based Domain-Specific Sentiment Lexicons Tomáš Kliegr, Vaclav Zeman and Milan Dojchinovski, Linked Hypernyms Dataset - Generation framework and Use Cases Ismail El Maarouf, Jane Bradbury and Patrick Hanks, PDEV-lemon: a Linked Data implementation of the Pattern Dictionary of English Verbs based on the Lemon model 18:30 – 19:00 – Discussions and Closing ii Editors Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Christian Chiarcos Germany John Philip McCrae University of Bielefeld, Germany Petya Osenova Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria Cristina Vertan University of Hamburg, Germany Workshop Organizers/Organizing Committee Christian Chiarcos Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Germany John Philip McCrae University of Bielefeld, Germany Kiril Simov Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria Antonio Branco University of Lisbon, Portugal Nicoletta Calzolari ILC-CNR, Italy Petya Osenova University of Sofia, Bulgaria Milena Slavcheva JRC-Brussels, Belgium Cristina Vertan University of Hamburg, Germany Workshop Programme Committee Eneko Agirre University of the Basque Country, Spain Guadalupe Aguado Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Spain Interdisciplinary Centre for Social and Peter Bouda Language Documentation, Portugal Steve Cassidy Macquarie University, Australia Damir Cavar Eastern Michigan University, USA Walter Daelemans University of Antwerp, Belgium University of Applied Sciences Potsdam, Ernesto William De Luca Germany Gerard de Melo University of California at Berkeley, USA Institute of Information Sciences, Academia Dongpo Deng Sinica, Taiwan Alexis Dimitriadis Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands Jeff Good University at Buffalo, USA Asunción Gómez Pérez Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Spain Jorge Gracia Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Spain Walther v. Hahn University of Hamburg, Germany Eva Hajicova Charles University Prague, Czech Republic Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen, The Harald Hammarström Netherlands Yoshihiko Hayashi Osaka University, Japan Sebastian Hellmann Universität Leipzig, Germany Dominic Jones Trinity College Dublin, Ireland Lutz Maicher Universität Leipzig, Germany iii Open Knowledge Foundation Deutschland, Pablo Mendes Germany Universität Zürich, Switzerland/Ludwig Steven Moran Maximilian University, Germany Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Sebastian Nordhoff Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany Maciej Piasecki Wroclaw University of Technology, Poland Adam Przepiorkowski IPAN, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland Laurent Romary INRIA, France Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Künstliche Felix Sasaki Intelligenz, Germany iv Table of contents Christian Chiarcos, John McCrae, Petya Osenova, Cristina Vertan, Linked Data in Linguistics vii 2014. Introduction and Overview Piek Vossen, The Collaborative Inter-Lingual-Index for harmonizing wordnets 2 Gerard de Mello, From Linked Data to Tightly Integrated Data 3 Andon Tchechmedjiev, Gilles Sérasset, Jérôme Goulian and Didier Schwab, Attaching 5 Translations to Proper Lexical Senses in DBnary John Philip McCrae, Christiane Fellbaum and Philipp Cimiano, Publishing and Linking 13 WordNet using lemon and RDF Andrey Kutuzov and Maxim Ionov, Releasing genre keywords of Russian movie descriptions 17 as Linguistic Linked Open Data: an experience report Matej Durco, Menzo Windhouwer, From CLARIN Component Metadata to Linked Open Data 23 Gary Lefman, David Lewis and Felix Sasaki, A Brief Survey of Multimedia Annotation 28 Localisation on the Web of Linked Data Daniel Jettka, Karim Kuropka, Cristina Vertan and Heike Zinsmeister, Towards a Linked 33 Open Data Representation of a Grammar Terms Index Christian Chiarcos and Maria Sukhareva, Linking Etymological Databases. A case study in 40 Germanic Fahad Khan, Federico Boschetti and Francesca Frontini, Using lemon to Model Lexical 49 Semantic Shift in Diachronic Lexical Resources Steven Moran and Michael Cysouw, Typology with graphs and matrices 54 Robert Forkel, The Cross-Linguistic Linked Data project 60 Gilles Sérasset and Andon Tchechmedjiev, Dbnary: Wiktionary as Linked Data for 12 67 Language Editions with Enhanced Translation Relations Maud Ehrmann, Francesco Cecconi, Daniele Vannella, John Philip McCrae, Philipp Cimiano 71 and Roberto Navigli, A Multilingual Semantic Network as Linked Data: lemon-BabelNet Gabriela Vulcu, Raul Lario Monje, Mario Munoz, Paul Buitelaar and Carlos A. Iglesias, 76 Linked-Data based Domain-Specific Sentiment Lexicons Tomáš Kliegr, Vaclav Zeman and Milan Dojchinovski, Linked Hypernyms Dataset - 81 Generation framework and Use Cases Ismail El Maarouf, Jane Bradbury and Patrick Hanks, PDEV-lemon: a Linked Data 87 implementation of the Pattern Dictionary of English Verbs based on the Lemon model v Author Index Boschetti, Federico. 49 Bradbury, Jane. .87 Buitelaar, Paul. .76 Cecconi, Francesco. 71 Chiarcos, Christian . .vii, 40 Cimiano, Philipp . .13, 71 McCrae, John . vii, 13, 71 Cysouw, Michael. .54 Dojchinovski, Milan. 81 Durco, Matej. 23 Ehrmann, Maud. .71 Fellbaum, Christiane. .13 Forkel, Robert. .60 Frontini, Francesca. .49 Goulian, Jérôme. .5 Hanks, Patrick. 87 Iglesias, Carlos A. .76 Ionov, Maxim. 17 Jettka, Daniel. .33 Khan, Fahad. .49 Kliegr, Tomáš. 81 Kuropka, Karim. .33 Kutuzov, Andrey. 17 Lario Monje, Raul. 76 Lefman, Gary. 28 Lewis, David. .28 El Maarouf, . ..87 de Mello, Gerard. 3 Moran, Steven. .54 Munoz, Mario. .76 Navigli, Roberto. 71 Osenova, Petya. .vii Sasaki, Felix. .28 Schwab, Didier. .5 Sérasset, Gilles . 5, 67 Sukhareva, Maria. ..40 Tchechmedjiev, Andon . .5, 67 Vannella, Daniele. .71 Vertan, Cristina . vii, 33 Vulcu, Gabriela. .76 Vossen, Piek. .2 Windhouwer, Menzo. .23 Zeman, Vaclav. .81 Zinsmeister, Heike. .33 vi Linked Data in Linguistics 2014. Introduction and Overview Christian Chiarcos1, John McCrae2, Petya Osenova3, Cristina Vertan4 1 Goethe-Universitat¨ Frankfurt am Main, Germany, [email protected] 2 Universitat¨ Bielefeld, Germany, [email protected] 3 University of Sofia, Bulgaria, [email protected] 4 Universitat¨ Hamburg, Germany,[email protected] Abstract The Linked Data in Linguistics (LDL) workshop series brings together researchers from various fields of linguistics, natural language processing, and information technology to present and discuss principles, case studies, and best practices for representing, publishing and linking linguistic data collections. A major outcome of our work is the Linguistic
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Knowledge Graphs on the Web – an Overview Arxiv:2003.00719V3 [Cs
    January 2020 Knowledge Graphs on the Web – an Overview Nicolas HEIST, Sven HERTLING, Daniel RINGLER, and Heiko PAULHEIM Data and Web Science Group, University of Mannheim, Germany Abstract. Knowledge Graphs are an emerging form of knowledge representation. While Google coined the term Knowledge Graph first and promoted it as a means to improve their search results, they are used in many applications today. In a knowl- edge graph, entities in the real world and/or a business domain (e.g., people, places, or events) are represented as nodes, which are connected by edges representing the relations between those entities. While companies such as Google, Microsoft, and Facebook have their own, non-public knowledge graphs, there is also a larger body of publicly available knowledge graphs, such as DBpedia or Wikidata. In this chap- ter, we provide an overview and comparison of those publicly available knowledge graphs, and give insights into their contents, size, coverage, and overlap. Keywords. Knowledge Graph, Linked Data, Semantic Web, Profiling 1. Introduction Knowledge Graphs are increasingly used as means to represent knowledge. Due to their versatile means of representation, they can be used to integrate different heterogeneous data sources, both within as well as across organizations. [8,9] Besides such domain-specific knowledge graphs which are typically developed for specific domains and/or use cases, there are also public, cross-domain knowledge graphs encoding common knowledge, such as DBpedia, Wikidata, or YAGO. [33] Such knowl- edge graphs may be used, e.g., for automatically enriching data with background knowl- arXiv:2003.00719v3 [cs.AI] 12 Mar 2020 edge to be used in knowledge-intensive downstream applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Detecting Personal Life Events from Social Media
    Open Research Online The Open University’s repository of research publications and other research outputs Detecting Personal Life Events from Social Media Thesis How to cite: Dickinson, Thomas Kier (2019). Detecting Personal Life Events from Social Media. PhD thesis The Open University. For guidance on citations see FAQs. c 2018 The Author https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Version: Version of Record Link(s) to article on publisher’s website: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21954/ou.ro.00010aa9 Copyright and Moral Rights for the articles on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. For more information on Open Research Online’s data policy on reuse of materials please consult the policies page. oro.open.ac.uk Detecting Personal Life Events from Social Media a thesis presented by Thomas K. Dickinson to The Department of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of Computer Science The Open University Milton Keynes, England May 2019 Thesis advisor: Professor Harith Alani & Dr Paul Mulholland Thomas K. Dickinson Detecting Personal Life Events from Social Media Abstract Social media has become a dominating force over the past 15 years, with the rise of sites such as Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter. Some of us have been with these sites since the start, posting all about our personal lives and building up a digital identify of ourselves. But within this myriad of posts, what actually matters to us, and what do our digital identities tell people about ourselves? One way that we can start to filter through this data, is to build classifiers that can identify posts about our personal life events, allowing us to start to self reflect on what we share online.
    [Show full text]
  • Unsupervised, Knowledge-Free, and Interpretable Word Sense Disambiguation
    Unsupervised, Knowledge-Free, and Interpretable Word Sense Disambiguation Alexander Panchenkoz, Fide Martenz, Eugen Ruppertz, Stefano Faralliy, Dmitry Ustalov∗, Simone Paolo Ponzettoy, and Chris Biemannz zLanguage Technology Group, Department of Informatics, Universitat¨ Hamburg, Germany yWeb and Data Science Group, Department of Informatics, Universitat¨ Mannheim, Germany ∗Institute of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Ural Federal University, Russia fpanchenko,marten,ruppert,[email protected] fsimone,[email protected] [email protected] Abstract manually in one of the underlying resources, such as Wikipedia. Unsupervised knowledge-free ap- Interpretability of a predictive model is proaches, e.g. (Di Marco and Navigli, 2013; Bar- a powerful feature that gains the trust of tunov et al., 2016), require no manual labor, but users in the correctness of the predictions. the resulting sense representations lack the above- In word sense disambiguation (WSD), mentioned features enabling interpretability. For knowledge-based systems tend to be much instance, systems based on sense embeddings are more interpretable than knowledge-free based on dense uninterpretable vectors. Therefore, counterparts as they rely on the wealth of the meaning of a sense can be interpreted only on manually-encoded elements representing the basis of a list of related senses. word senses, such as hypernyms, usage We present a system that brings interpretability examples, and images. We present a WSD of the knowledge-based sense representations into system that bridges the gap between these the world of unsupervised knowledge-free WSD two so far disconnected groups of meth- models. The contribution of this paper is the first ods. Namely, our system, providing access system for word sense induction and disambigua- to several state-of-the-art WSD models, tion, which is unsupervised, knowledge-free, and aims to be interpretable as a knowledge- interpretable at the same time.
    [Show full text]
  • Ten Years of Babelnet: a Survey
    Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-21) Survey Track Ten Years of BabelNet: A Survey Roberto Navigli1 , Michele Bevilacqua1 , Simone Conia1 , Dario Montagnini2 and Francesco Cecconi2 1Sapienza NLP Group, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy 2Babelscape, Italy froberto.navigli, michele.bevilacqua, [email protected] fmontagnini, [email protected] Abstract to integrate symbolic knowledge into neural architectures [d’Avila Garcez and Lamb, 2020]. The rationale is that the The intelligent manipulation of symbolic knowl- use of, and linkage to, symbolic knowledge can not only en- edge has been a long-sought goal of AI. How- able interpretable, explainable and accountable AI systems, ever, when it comes to Natural Language Process- but it can also increase the degree of generalization to rare ing (NLP), symbols have to be mapped to words patterns (e.g., infrequent meanings) and promote better use and phrases, which are not only ambiguous but also of information which is not explicit in the text. language-specific: multilinguality is indeed a de- Symbolic knowledge requires that the link between form sirable property for NLP systems, and one which and meaning be made explicit, connecting strings to repre- enables the generalization of tasks where multiple sentations of concepts, entities and thoughts. Historical re- languages need to be dealt with, without translat- sources such as WordNet [Miller, 1995] are important en- ing text. In this paper we survey BabelNet, a pop- deavors which systematize symbolic knowledge about the ular wide-coverage lexical-semantic knowledge re- words of a language, i.e., lexicographic knowledge, not only source obtained by merging heterogeneous sources in a machine-readable format, but also in structured form, into a unified semantic network that helps to scale thanks to the organization of concepts into a semantic net- tasks and applications to hundreds of languages.
    [Show full text]
  • KOI at Semeval-2018 Task 5: Building Knowledge Graph of Incidents
    KOI at SemEval-2018 Task 5: Building Knowledge Graph of Incidents 1 2 2 Paramita Mirza, Fariz Darari, ∗ Rahmad Mahendra ∗ 1 Max Planck Institute for Informatics, Germany 2 Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia paramita @mpi-inf.mpg.de fariz,rahmad.mahendra{ } @cs.ui.ac.id { } Abstract Subtask S3 In order to answer questions of type (ii), participating systems are also required We present KOI (Knowledge of Incidents), a to identify participant roles in each identified an- system that given news articles as input, builds swer incident (e.g., victim, subject-suspect), and a knowledge graph (KOI-KG) of incidental use such information along with victim-related nu- events. KOI-KG can then be used to effi- merals (“three people were killed”) mentioned in ciently answer questions such as “How many the corresponding answer documents, i.e., docu- killing incidents happened in 2017 that involve ments that report on the answer incident, to deter- Sean?” The required steps in building the KG include: (i) document preprocessing involv- mine the total number of victims. ing word sense disambiguation, named-entity Datasets The organizers released two datasets: recognition, temporal expression recognition and normalization, and semantic role labeling; (i) test data, stemming from three domains of (ii) incidental event extraction and coreference gun violence, fire disasters and business, and (ii) resolution via document clustering; and (iii) trial data, covering only the gun violence domain. KG construction and population. Each dataset
    [Show full text]
  • Web Search Result Clustering with Babelnet
    Web Search Result Clustering with BabelNet Marek Kozlowski Maciej Kazula OPI-PIB OPI-PIB [email protected] [email protected] Abstract 2 Related Work In this paper we present well-known 2.1 Search Result Clustering search result clustering method enriched with BabelNet information. The goal is The goal of text clustering in information retrieval to verify how Babelnet/Babelfy can im- is to discover groups of semantically related docu- prove the clustering quality in the web ments. Contextual descriptions (snippets) of docu- search results domain. During the evalua- ments returned by a search engine are short, often tion we tested three algorithms (Bisecting incomplete, and highly biased toward the query, so K-Means, STC, Lingo). At the first stage, establishing a notion of proximity between docu- we performed experiments only with tex- ments is a challenging task that is called Search tual features coming from snippets. Next, Result Clustering (SRC). Search Results Cluster- we introduced new semantic features from ing (SRC) is a specific area of documents cluster- BabelNet (as disambiguated synsets, cate- ing. gories and glosses describing synsets, or Approaches to search result clustering can be semantic edges) in order to verify how classified as data-centric or description-centric they influence on the clustering quality (Carpineto, 2009). of the search result clustering. The al- The data-centric approach (as Bisecting K- gorithms were evaluated on AMBIENT Means) focuses more on the problem of data clus- dataset in terms of the clustering quality. tering, rather than presenting the results to the user. Other data-centric methods use hierarchical 1 Introduction agglomerative clustering (Maarek, 2000) that re- In the previous years, Web clustering engines places single terms with lexical affinities (2-grams (Carpineto, 2009) have been proposed as a solu- of words) as features, or exploit link information tion to the issue of lexical ambiguity in Informa- (Zhang, 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Corpus Tools for Lexicographers
    Comp. by: pg0994 Stage : Proof ChapterID: 0001546186 Date:14/5/12 Time:16:20:14 Filepath:d:/womat-filecopy/0001546186.3D31 OUP UNCORRECTED PROOF – FIRST PROOF, 14/5/2012, SPi 3 Corpus tools for lexicographers ADAM KILGARRIFF AND IZTOK KOSEM 3.1 Introduction To analyse corpus data, lexicographers need software that allows them to search, manipulate and save data, a ‘corpus tool’. A good corpus tool is the key to a comprehensive lexicographic analysis—a corpus without a good tool to access it is of little use. Both corpus compilation and corpus tools have been swept along by general technological advances over the last three decades. Compiling and storing corpora has become far faster and easier, so corpora tend to be much larger than previous ones. Most of the first COBUILD dictionary was produced from a corpus of eight million words. Several of the leading English dictionaries of the 1990s were produced using the British National Corpus (BNC), of 100 million words. Current lexico- graphic projects we are involved in use corpora of around a billion words—though this is still less than one hundredth of one percent of the English language text available on the Web (see Rundell, this volume). The amount of data to analyse has thus increased significantly, and corpus tools have had to be improved to assist lexicographers in adapting to this change. Corpus tools have become faster, more multifunctional, and customizable. In the COBUILD project, getting concordance output took a long time and then the concordances were printed on paper and handed out to lexicographers (Clear 1987).
    [Show full text]
  • Oasics-ICLP-2017-13.Pdf (0.4
    Achieving High Quality Knowledge Acquisition using Controlled Natural Language Tiantian Gao∗ Department of Computer Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA [email protected] Abstract Controlled Natural Languages (CNLs) are efficient languages for knowledge acquisition and reas- oning. They are designed as a subset of natural languages with restricted grammar while being highly expressive. CNLs are designed to be automatically translated into logical representations, which can be fed into rule engines for query and reasoning. In this work, we build a knowledge acquisition machine, called KAM, that extends Attempto Controlled English (ACE) and achieves three goals. First, KAM can identify CNL sentences that correspond to the same logical rep- resentation but expressed in various syntactical forms. Second, KAM provides a graphical user interface (GUI) that allows users to disambiguate the knowledge acquired from text and incorpor- ates user feedback to improve knowledge acquisition quality. Third, KAM uses a paraconsistent logical framework to encode CNL sentences in order to achieve reasoning in the presence of inconsistent knowledge. 1998 ACM Subject Classification I.2.1 Applications and Expert Systems Keywords and phrases Logic Programming, Controlled Natural Languages, Knowledge Acquis- ition Digital Object Identifier 10.4230/OASIcs.ICLP.2017.13 1 Introduction Much of human knowledge can be represented as rules and facts, which can be used by rule engines (e.g., XSB [22], Clingo [9], IDP [5]) to conduct formal logical reasoning in order to derive new conclusions, answer questions, or explain the validity of true statements. However, rules and facts extracted from human knowledge can be very complex in the real world.
    [Show full text]
  • From Strings to Things SAR-Graphs: a New Type of Resource for Connecting Knowledge and Language
    From Strings to Things SAR-Graphs: A New Type of Resource for Connecting Knowledge and Language Hans Uszkoreit and Feiyu Xu Language Technology Lab, DFKI, Alt-Moabit 91c, Berlin, Germany {uszkoreit,feiyu}@dfki.de Abstract. Recent research and development have created the necessary ingredients for a major push in web-scale language understanding: large repositories of structured knowledge (DBpedia, the Google knowledge graph, Freebase, YAGO) progress in language processing (parsing, infor- mation extraction, computational semantics), linguistic knowledge re- sources (Treebanks, WordNet, BabelNet, UWN) and new powerful tech- niques for machine learning. A major goal is the automatic aggregation of knowledge from textual data. A central component of this endeavor is relation extraction (RE). In this paper, we will outline a new approach to connecting repositories of world knowledge with linguistic knowledge (syntactic and lexical semantics) via web-scale relation extraction tech- nologies. Keywords: Knowledge Graph, Grammar-based Relation Extraction Rules, Relation- specific lexical semantic graphs, Linking linguistic resources 1 Motivation The powerful vision of a semantic web has already started materializing through large repositories of structured knowledge extracted from Wikipedia and other sources of texts or data bases. The existence of these knowledge resources and further progress in linking open data collections has nurtured the demand for even more extensive sources of structured knowledge. Although some (linked) open data collections can feed into the stock of digital knowledge, the most effec- tive growth is expected from automatic extraction of information and knowledge out of texts. Knowledge repositories such as the DBpedia [1] are not only driv- ing advanced research in this important field but they also serve as important resources for the applied learning methods.
    [Show full text]
  • The Interplay Between Lexical Resources and Natural Language Processing
    Tutorial on: The interplay between lexical resources and Natural Language Processing Google Group: goo.gl/JEazYH 1 Luis Espinosa Anke Jose Camacho-Collados Mohammad Taher Pilehvar Google Group: goo.gl/JEazYH 2 Luis Espinosa Anke (linguist) Jose Camacho-Collados (mathematician) Mohammad Taher Pilehvar (computer scientist) 3 www.kahoot.it PIN: 7024700 NAACL 2018 Tutorial: The Interplay between Lexical Resources and Natural Language Processing Camacho-Collados, Espinosa-Anke, Pilehvar 4 QUESTION 1 PIN: 7024700 www.kahoot.it NAACL 2018 Tutorial: The Interplay between Lexical Resources and Natural Language Processing Camacho-Collados, Espinosa-Anke, Pilehvar 5 Outline 1. Introduction 2. Overview of Lexical Resources 3. NLP for Lexical Resources 4. Lexical Resources for NLP 5. Conclusion and Future Directions NAACL 2018 Tutorial: The Interplay between Lexical Resources and Natural Language Processing Camacho-Collados, Espinosa-Anke, Pilehvar 6 INTRODUCTION NAACL 2018 Tutorial: The Interplay between Lexical Resources and Natural Language Processing Camacho-Collados, Espinosa-Anke, Pilehvar 7 Introduction ● “A lexical resource (LR) is a database consisting of one or several dictionaries.” (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lexical_resource) ● “What is lexical resource? In a word it is vocabulary and it matters for IELTS writing because …” (dcielts.com/ielts-writing/lexical-resource) ● “The term Language Resource refers to a set of speech or language data and descriptions in machine readable form, used for … ” (elra.info/en/about/what-language-resource )
    [Show full text]
  • LDL-2014 3Rd Workshop on Linked Data in Linguistics
    3rd Workshop on Linked Data in Linguistics: Multilingual Knowledge Resources and Natural Language Processing Workshop Programme 08:30 - 09:00 – Opening and Introduction by Workshop Chair(s) 09:00 – 10:00 – Invited Talk Piek Vossen, The Collaborative Inter-Lingual-Index for harmonizing wordnets 10:00 – 10:30 – Session 1: Modeling Lexical-Semantic Resources with lemon Andon Tchechmedjiev, Gilles Sérasset, Jérôme Goulian and Didier Schwab, Attaching Translations to Proper Lexical Senses in DBnary 10:30 – 11:00 Coffee break 11:00-11:20– Session 1: Modeling Lexical-Semantic Resources with lemon John Philip McCrae, Christiane Fellbaum and Philipp Cimiano, Publishing and Linking WordNet using lemon and RDF 11:20-11:40– Session 1: Modeling Lexical-Semantic Resources with lemon Andrey Kutuzov and Maxim Ionov, Releasing genre keywords of Russian movie descriptions as Linguistic Linked Open Data: an experience report 11:40-12:00– Session 2: Metadata Matej Durco and Menzo Windhouwer, From CLARIN Component Metadata to Linked Open Data 12:00-12:20– Session 2: Metadata Gary Lefman, David Lewis and Felix Sasaki, A Brief Survey of Multimedia Annotation Localisation on the Web of Linked Data 12:20-12:50– Session 2: Metadata Daniel Jettka, Karim Kuropka, Cristina Vertan and Heike Zinsmeister, Towards a Linked Open Data Representation of a Grammar Terms Index 12:50-13:00 – Poster slam – Data Challenge 13:00 – 14:00 Lunch break 14:00 – 15:00 – Invited Talk Gerard de Mello, From Linked Data to Tightly Integrated Data 15:00 – 15:30 – Section 3: Crosslinguistic
    [Show full text]
  • “Lexicography in the Digital World” Krabi, Thailand 8
    ASIALEX 2018 “Lexicography in the Digital World” Krabi, Thailand 8th – 10th June, 2018 Programme and Abstracts http://www.kmitl.ac.th/asialex/ Organisers The Asian Association for Lexicography (ASIALEX) King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang (KMITL) WELCOME MESSAGE On behalf of ASIALEX 2018 Organising Committee, we are delighted to welcome you to the conference in Krabi during the 8th to 10th of June, 2018. We would like to give a Thai traditional greeting ‘Sawasdee’ to you all of our honoured guests. The 12th International Conference of the Asian Association for Lexicography (ASIALEX 2018) is supported by King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Thailand. This year, the theme of the conference is Lexicography in the digital World. We are grateful to have five distinguished keynote speakers: Pedro A. Fuertes-Olivera from University of Valladolid (Spain), Pam Peters from Macquarie University (Australia), John Simpson from University of Oxford (England), Shigeru Yamada from Waseda University (Japan), and Virach Sornlertlamvanich from Thammasart University (Thailand). A total number of 43 papers have been submitted from around the world. All papers have been peer reviewed by Scientific Committee. Apart from participating in the conference, we invite you to explore the most beautiful beaches and city of Krabi on the west coast of southern Thailand. It offers not only the nature, but also a unique treasure trove of cultural attractions such as temples and traditional ways of life of the southern part of Thailand. We hope that you have a fabulous experiencing net-working during the conference and enjoy spending time on fantastic white-sand beaches and turquoise water in Krabi, the most beautiful venue in Thailand.
    [Show full text]