Rutland Council Tax Booklet 2015-16
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Great Casterton Parish Plan 2005
A1 © Crown Copyright. All rights reserved. Rutland Council District Council Licence No. LA 100018056 With Special thanks to: 2 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. History 3. Community and household 4. Transport and traffic 5. Crime and community safety 6. Sport and leisure 7. Youth 8. Village church 9. Education 10. Retail services 11. Farming and heritage 12. Conservation and the environment 13. Planning and development 14. Health and social services 15. Information and communication 16. Local councils 17. Conclusion 18. Action plan 3 INTRODUCTION PARISH PLANS Parish plans are part of the “Vital Villages” initiative of the Countryside Agency, run locally through the Rural Community Council (Leicestershire & Rutland). A Parish Plan should provide a picture of a village, identifying through consultation the concerns and needs of its residents. From the plan villages should identify actions to improve the village and the life of the community. The resulting Village Action Plan is then used to inform the County Council, through the Parish Council. Parish Plans have a statutory place in local government. GREAT CASTERTON PARISH PLAN Great Casterton’s Parish Plan started with a meeting of villagers in June 2002. There was particular interest because of a contentious planning decision imposed by the County Council on the village. The Community Development Officer for Rutland, Adele Stainsby, explained the purpose of the plan and the benefits for the village. A committee was formed, and a constitution drawn up. The Parish Council promised a small initial grant while an application for Countryside Agency funding was prepared. The money granted was to be balanced by the voluntary work of villagers. -
9 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
9 bus time schedule & line map 9 Oakham - Stamford View In Website Mode The 9 bus line (Oakham - Stamford) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Oakham: 8:23 AM - 4:45 PM (2) Stamford: 7:53 AM - 3:55 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 9 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 9 bus arriving. Direction: Oakham 9 bus Time Schedule 22 stops Oakham Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 8:23 AM - 4:45 PM Bus Station, Stamford 12 All Saints Street, Stamford Tuesday 8:23 AM - 4:45 PM All Saints' Church, Stamford Wednesday 8:23 AM - 4:45 PM 12 All Saints Place, Stamford Thursday 8:23 AM - 4:45 PM Beverley Gardens, Stamford Friday 8:23 AM - 4:45 PM Casterton Road, Stamford Saturday Not Operational Waverley Gardens, Stamford Caledonian Road, Stamford Ayr Close, Stamford 9 bus Info Casterton Road, Stamford Civil Parish Direction: Oakham Stops: 22 Belvoir Close, Stamford Trip Duration: 27 min Line Summary: Bus Station, Stamford, All Saints' Arran Road (North End), Stamford Church, Stamford, Beverley Gardens, Stamford, Waverley Gardens, Stamford, Caledonian Road, Sidney Farm Lane, Stamford Stamford, Ayr Close, Stamford, Belvoir Close, Stamford, Arran Road (North End), Stamford, Sidney Tolethorpe, Great Casterton Farm Lane, Stamford, Tolethorpe, Great Casterton, Church, Great Casterton, The Plough, Great Church, Great Casterton Casterton, Bus Shelter, Tickencote, School Lane, Empingham, Wiloughby Drive, Empingham, Exton The Plough, Great Casterton Road, Empingham, Rutland Water -
Rutland County Council Electoral Review Submission on Warding Patterns
Rutland County Council Electoral Review Submission on Warding Patterns INTRODUCTION 1. The Council presented a Submission on Council Size to the Local Government Boundary Commission for England (LGBCE) on 11 July 2017 following approval at Full Council. On 25 July the LGBCE wrote to the Council advising that it was minded to recommend that 26 County Councillors should be elected to Rutland County Council in future in accordance with the Council’s submission. 2. The second stage of the review concerns warding arrangements. The Council size will be used to determine the average (optimum) number of Electors per councillor to be achieved across all wards of the authority. This number is reached by dividing the electorate by the number of Councillors on the authority. The LGBCE initial consultation on Warding Patterns takes place between 25 July 2017 and 2 October 2017. 3. The Constitution Review Working Group is Cross Party member group. The terms of reference for the Constitution Review Working Group (CRWG) (Agreed at Annual Council 8 May 2017) provide that the working group will review arrangements, reports and recommendations arising from Boundary and Community Governance reviews. Therefore, the CRWG undertook to develop a proposal on warding patterns which would then be presented to Full Council on 11 September 2017 for approval before submission to the LGBCE. BACKGROUND 4. The Local Government Boundary Commission for England technical guidance states that an electoral review will be required when there is a notable variance in representation across the authority. A review will be initiated when: • more than 30% of a council’s wards/divisions having an electoral imbalance of more than 10% from the average ratio for that authority; and/or • one or more wards/divisions with an electoral imbalance of more than 30%; and • the imbalance is unlikely to be corrected by foreseeable changes to the electorate within a reasonable period. -
Designated Rural Areas and Designated Regions) (England) Order 2004
Status: This is the original version (as it was originally made). This item of legislation is currently only available in its original format. STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2004 No. 418 HOUSING, ENGLAND The Housing (Right to Buy) (Designated Rural Areas and Designated Regions) (England) Order 2004 Made - - - - 20th February 2004 Laid before Parliament 25th February 2004 Coming into force - - 17th March 2004 The First Secretary of State, in exercise of the powers conferred upon him by sections 157(1)(c) and 3(a) of the Housing Act 1985(1) hereby makes the following Order: Citation, commencement and interpretation 1.—(1) This Order may be cited as the Housing (Right to Buy) (Designated Rural Areas and Designated Regions) (England) Order 2004 and shall come into force on 17th March 2004. (2) In this Order “the Act” means the Housing Act 1985. Designated rural areas 2. The areas specified in the Schedule are designated as rural areas for the purposes of section 157 of the Act. Designated regions 3.—(1) In relation to a dwelling-house which is situated in a rural area designated by article 2 and listed in Part 1 of the Schedule, the designated region for the purposes of section 157(3) of the Act shall be the district of Forest of Dean. (2) In relation to a dwelling-house which is situated in a rural area designated by article 2 and listed in Part 2 of the Schedule, the designated region for the purposes of section 157(3) of the Act shall be the district of Rochford. (1) 1985 c. -
Local Government Boundary Commission for England Report No.199 LOCAL GOVERNMENT
Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No.199 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND REPORT ' NO. 199. PW To the Et Hon Merlyn Rees, HP Secretory of State for the Home Department PROPOSALS KOH FUTURE ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE DISTRICT OF RUTLAND IN THE COUNTY OF LEICESTERSHIRE 1* We, the Local Government Boundary Commission for England, having carried out our initial review of the electoral arrangements for the district of Rutland, in . accordance with the requirements of section 63 oft and Schedule 9 to, the Local Government Act, 19?2, present our proposals for the future electoral arrangements for that District. 2* In accordance with the procedure laid down in section 60(1) and (2) of the 1972 Act, notice was given on 31 December 1971*- that we were to undertake this review* This was incorporated in a consultation letter addressed to Rutland Idutrict Council, copies of which were circulated to the Leicestershire County Council, Parish Councils and Parish Meetings, the member of Parliament for the constituency concerned and the headquarters of the main political parties. Copies were also sent to the editors of local newspapers circulating in the area and of the local government press* Notices inserted in the local press announced the start of the review and invited comments from members of the public and from interested bodies* 3* Rutland District Council were invited to prepare a draft scheme of representa- tion for our consideration. When doing so, they were asked to observe the rules laid down in Schedule 11 to the Local Government Act 1972 and the guidelines which we set out in our Report No 6 about the proposed size of the Council and the proposed number of councillors for each ward. -
Areas Designated As 'Rural' for Right to Buy Purposes
Areas designated as 'Rural' for right to buy purposes Region District Designated areas Date designated East Rutland the parishes of Ashwell, Ayston, Barleythorpe, Barrow, 17 March Midlands Barrowden, Beaumont Chase, Belton, Bisbrooke, Braunston, 2004 Brooke, Burley, Caldecott, Clipsham, Cottesmore, Edith SI 2004/418 Weston, Egleton, Empingham, Essendine, Exton, Glaston, Great Casterton, Greetham, Gunthorpe, Hambelton, Horn, Ketton, Langham, Leighfield, Little Casterton, Lyddington, Lyndon, Manton, Market Overton, Martinsthorpe, Morcott, Normanton, North Luffenham, Pickworth, Pilton, Preston, Ridlington, Ryhall, Seaton, South Luffenham, Stoke Dry, Stretton, Teigh, Thistleton, Thorpe by Water, Tickencote, Tinwell, Tixover, Wardley, Whissendine, Whitwell, Wing. East of North Norfolk the whole district, with the exception of the parishes of 15 February England Cromer, Fakenham, Holt, North Walsham and Sheringham 1982 SI 1982/21 East of Kings Lynn and the parishes of Anmer, Bagthorpe with Barmer, Barton 17 March England West Norfolk Bendish, Barwick, Bawsey, Bircham, Boughton, Brancaster, 2004 Burnham Market, Burnham Norton, Burnham Overy, SI 2004/418 Burnham Thorpe, Castle Acre, Castle Rising, Choseley, Clenchwarton, Congham, Crimplesham, Denver, Docking, Downham West, East Rudham, East Walton, East Winch, Emneth, Feltwell, Fincham, Flitcham cum Appleton, Fordham, Fring, Gayton, Great Massingham, Grimston, Harpley, Hilgay, Hillington, Hockwold-Cum-Wilton, Holme- Next-The-Sea, Houghton, Ingoldisthorpe, Leziate, Little Massingham, Marham, Marshland -
Pedigree Chart for Samuel Booker Robertson
Pedigree Chart for Samuel Booker Robertson Parents Grandparents Great-Grandparents 2nd Great- Grandparents William Robertson Unknown b: Abt. 21 Jul 1728 … m: Abt. 1751 in Cu… John Robertson d: Abt. Jul 1796 in … b: 1753 in Virginia m: 29 Mar 1787 in Nelson Co., KY d: Abt. Nov 1813 in Elizabeth Latham John Latham Nelson Co., KY 2 b: Abt. 1728 William Nelson d: Robertson Susannah Churchill b: 17 Jun 1790 in 3 Nelson Co., KY m: 01 Jan 1811 in Washington Co., Richard Parker John Parker KY 4 d: 30 Jan 1865 in b: Abt. 1745 in Ha… McLean Co., KY m: 16 Aug 1765 in … d: Feb 1799 in W… Mary Parker Elizabeth Taliaferro b: Abt. 1768 in 5 Culpeper Co., VA d: 1825 in Washington Co., Grizzel Nalle John Nalle KY 6 Samuel Booker b: Abt. 1742 in Ora… Robertson d: 10 Dec 1799 in … b: 28 May 1824 in Mary Brown Nelson Co., KY 7 m: 24 Dec 1840 in Daviess Co., KY; now McLean Co., Samuel Overton James Overton KY 8 d: 15 Oct 1898 in b: 1728 in Hanover … McLean Co., KY m: Bef. 1760 d: Bef. 28 May 176… Samuel Overton Elizabeth Garland b: Dec 1760 in 9 Amelia Co., VA m: Bet. 1780–1789 d: 30 Apr 1836 Rebecca Booker Edmund Booker 10 b: Abt. 1735 in Amelia Booker Amelia Co., VA Overton d: Abt. 1800 in VA or Jane Stokes b: 30 Jun 1792 in KY Washington Co., KY d: 16 Jul 1881 in John Cosby David Cosby McLean Co., KY 11 b: 19 Sep 1741 in … m: Abt. -
TRANSPORT 2020 Route Finder Stamford College Transport Guide Stamford College Transport Guide Route Finder
Stamford College TRANSPORT 2020 Route Finder Stamford College Transport Guide Stamford College Transport Guide Route Finder Lower Benefield ..............................................1 Thorney ...............................................................4 ROUTE FINDER Manton ................................................................ 8 Thurlby ..............................................................PS Market Deeping .........................................PS Tickencote ....................................................... 14 Market Overton ........................................... 14 Tinwell .................................................................. 8 Ailsworth ............................................................4 Dunsby .............................................................PS Maxey ..................................................................12 Toft .......................................................................PS Alwalton ...............................................................3 Easton on the Hill ...........................................1 Moulton ............................................................. 10 Uffington .........................................................PS Apethorpe ...........................................................1 Edith Weston................................................... 8 Moulton Chapel ............................................12 Upper Benefield .............................................1 Aslackby ...........................................................PS -
Land at Great Casterton, Stamford, Rutland
A productive parcel of Grade 2 arable land, North of Stamford, in Rutland Land at Great Casterton, Stamford, Rutland Land at Great Casterton Farm Business Tenancy Overage Health & Safety The land is currently let on a Farm Business The property is subject to overage provisions. Given the potential hazards of a working farm we Stamford, Rutland, PE4 4AT Tenancy which is due to terminate on 26 These will apply in the event of a change of ask you to be as vigilant as possible when making September 2018. use of all or part of the land for uses other than your inspection for your own personal safety. A productive parcel of Grade 2 arable agriculture. In such instance, the buyer (and land in an outstanding area of Rutland, Services successors in title) will pay to the seller 50% of Directions North of Stamford There are no services to the property. the uplift in value for a period of 80 years. From Stamford, take the B1081 Casterton Road towards Tickencote. At the crossroads in the Stamford 2 miles, Peterborough 18 miles, Wayleaves, Rights of Way & Easements Local Authority village of Great Casterton take the right hand Melton Mowbray 20 miles The sale is subject to all rights of support, Rutland County Council Tel: 01572 722577 turn onto Ryhall Road, leading towards Ryhall. including public and private rights of way, water, The land is located on the right hand side after Location light, drainage and other easements, quasi- VAT approximately 0.75 miles. The land lies to the North East of Great easements, wayleaves and restrictive covenants Any guide price quoted or discussed is Casterton village in Rutland, the land is accessed and all existing proposed wayleaves for masts, exclusive of VAT. -
Out of Print Click to Download
Number One . .. " .. "'. '\� . .. :,;. :':f..• � .,1- '. , ... .Alt,;'�: ' � .. :: ",' , " • .r1� .: : •.: . .... .' , "" "" "·';'i:\:.'·'�., ' ' • •• ·.1 ..:',.. , ..... ,:.' ::.,::: ; ')"'� ,\:.", . '." � ' ,., d',,,·· '� . ' . � ., ., , , " ,' . ":'�, , " ,I -; .. ',' :... .: . :. , . : . ,',." The Rutland Record Society was formed in May 1979. Its object is to advise the education of the public in the history of the Ancient County of Rutland, in particular by collecting, preserving, printing and publishing historical records relating to that County, making such records accessible for research purposes to anyone following a particular line of historical study, and stimUlating interest generally in the history of that County. PATRON Col. T.C.S. Haywood, O.B.E., J.P. H.M. Lieutenant for the County of Leicestershire with special responsibility for Rutland PRESIDENT G.H. Boyle, Esq., Bisbrooke Hall, Uppingham CHAIRMAN Prince Yuri Galitzine, Quaintree Hall, Braunston, Oakham VICE-CHAIRMAN Miss J. Spencer, The Orchard, Braunston, Oakham HONORARY SECRETARIES B. Matthews, Esq., Colley Hill, Lyddington, Uppingham M.E. Baines, Esq., 14 Main Street, Ridlington, Uppingham HONORAR Y TREASURER The Manager, Midland Bank Limited, 28 High Street, Oakham HONORARY SOLICITOR J.B. Ervin, Esq., McKinnell, Ervin & MitchelI, 1 & 3 New Street, Leicester HONORARY ARCHIVIST G.A. Chinnery, Esq., Pear Tree Cottage, Hungarton, Leicestershire HONORAR Y EDITOR Bryan Waites, Esq., 6 Chater Road, Oakham COUNCIL President, Chairman, Vice-Chairman, Trustees, Secretaries, -
Rutland Parish and Ward Boundary
SHEET 1, MAP 1 THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND ELECTORAL REVIEW OF RUTLAND Final recommendations for ward boundaries in the county of Rutland April 2018 Sheet 1 of 1 KEY TO PARISH WARDS Boundary alignment and names shown on the mapping background may not be up to date. They may differ from the latest boundary information applied as part of this review. OAKHAM CP A BARLEYTHORPE ROAD B OAKHAM NORTH EAST This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey C OAKHAM NORTH WEST on behalf of the Keeper of Public Records © Crown copyright and database right. D OAKHAM SOUTH Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and database right. The Local Government Boundary Commission for England GD100049926 2018. THISTLETON CP MARKET STRETTON OVERTON CP CP CLIPSHAM TEIGH CP CP BARROW GREETHAM WHISSENDINE CP COTTESMORE GREETHAM WHISSENDINE CP CP COTTESMORE CP ASHWELL PICKWORTH CP CP ESSENDINE CP LANGHAM RYHALL & RYHALL LANGHAM CASTERTON CP CP EXTON AND BURLEY GREAT HORN CP CP CASTERTON CP TICKENCOTE BARLEYTHORPE OAKHAM B CP NORTH EXTON BARLEYTHORPE EAST CP LITTLE A EMPINGHAM CASTERTON CP CP WHITWELL CP OAKHAM C NORTH OAKHAM WEST CP OAKHAM SOUTH D TINWELL CP EGLETON CP HAMBLETON BRAUNSTON-IN-RUTLAND CP CP NORMANTON CP GUNTHORPE BROOKE CP EDITH CP WESTON CP NORMANTON KETTON CP MARTINSTHORPE MANTON CP CP LYNDON CP LEIGHFIELD CP NORTH BRAUNSTON & LUFFENHAM CP MARTINSTHORPE PILTON CP PRESTON WING CP RIDLINGTON CP CP KETTON SOUTH LUFFENHAM CP BELTON-IN-RUTLAND MORCOTT CP AYSTON CP CP TIXOVER CP GLASTON CP WARDLEY BARROWDEN CP CP UPPINGHAM P BISBROOKE C CP CP E S A H UPPINGHAM C T N O M U A E B SEATON CP LYDDINGTON LYDDINGTON STOKE CP DRY CP THORPE BY WATER CP CALDECOTT CP KEY 00.75 1.5 3 COUNTY COUNCIL BOUNDARY PARISH BOUNDARY PROPOSED WARD BOUNDARY COINCIDENT WITH PARISH BOUNDARY PROPOSED WARD BOUNDARY COINCIDENT WITH PROPOSED PARISH WARD BOUNDARY Kilometres UPPINGHAM PROPOSED WARD NAME 1 cm = 0.3328 km TINWELL CP PARISH NAME. -
Local Flood Risk Management Strategy
LOCAL FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY Version & Policy Number 1 Guardian Dave Brown, Director for Places (Environment, Planning & Transport) Date Produced 20 February 2018 Next Review Date 17 October 2022 Considered by Scrutiny 16 November 2017 Approved by Cabinet 17 April 2018 Appendix 1 - Rutland County Council - Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Summary of document This strategy will provide an overview for how the Council as the Lead Local Flood Authority (LLFA) will lead and co-ordinate local flood risk management in Rutland. It will act as the focal point for integrating all flood risk management functions in the County and has regard to the Environment Agency’s National Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management Strategy. The document provides a background to the need for such a strategy, detailing the local and national drivers whilst setting out where responsibility for different flood risks lay. The existing framework for managing and communicating flood risk is briefly described including how RCC are currently fulfilling their LLFA roles. The uplands of Rutland provide headwaters for three separate catchments, these relatively steep clay uplands appear conducive to flash flooding but historically the mapped risk and actual experience of flooding is somewhat limited, even during recent heavy rainfall events and as such the level of flood risk has been deemed to be relatively low in both local and national assessments. Two reservoirs dominate the landscape in the area and both are well managed and have a negligible flood risk being more significant for their wildlife designations and the amenity they provide to residents and visitors of the area.