DOCSLIB.ORG

INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS READING LIST for COMPREHENSIVE EXAMS Department of Political Science, University of California – Santa Barbara

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS READING LIST for COMPREHENSIVE EXAMS Department of Political Science, University of California – Santa Barbara IINTERNATIONAL RELATIONS READING LIST FOR COMPREHENSIVE EXAMS Department of Political Science, University of California – Santa Barbara Version Updated 2014 This reading list is intended for political science graduate students who are preparing to take the PhD qualifying exam in International Relations. This list includes the minimum recommended reading for each part of the exam. Students are expected to be familiar with additional readings beyond this core set. PART I: GENERAL INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THEORY THEORETICAL APPROACHES TO IR Anthology • Carlsnaes, Walter, Thomas Risse, and Beth A. Simmons, eds. Handbook of international relations. Sage, 2002. Realism • Morgenthau, Hans. Politics Among Nations: The struggle for power and peace. New York: Alfred Knopf, 1948. (Also Liberalism) • Waltz, Kenneth N. Theory of International Politics. NY: McGraw Hill, 1979. • Jervis, Robert. Perception and misperception in international politics. Princeton University Press, 1976. • Cederman, Lars-Erik. Emergent actors in world politics: how states and nations develop and dissolve. Princeton University Press, 1997. Liberalism • Doyle, Michael W. "Liberalism and world politics." APSR 80, no. 4 (1986): 1151. • Moravcsik, Andrew. "Taking preferences seriously: A liberal theory of international politics." IO 51, no. 04 (1997): 513-553. • Adler, Emanuel, and Michael Barnett, eds. Security Communities. Cambridge University Press, 1998. English School • Bull, Hedley. The anarchical society: a study of order in world politics. Columbia University Press, 2002. Constructivism • Wendt, Alexander. Social theory of international politics. Cambridge University Press, 1999. (or Wendt, Alexander. "Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics." IO 46, no. 02 (1992): 391-425.) • Hopf, Ted. "The promise of constructivism in international relations theory." IS 23, no. 1 (1998): 171-200. Strategic Choice • Lake, David A. and Robert Powell, eds., Strategic Choice and International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999. 1 • Levy, Jack S. "Prospect theory, rational choice, and international relations." International Studies Quarterly 41, no. 1 (1997): 87-112. Critiques • Feaver, Peter D., Gunther Hellmann, Randall L. Schweller, Jeffrey W. Taliaferro, William C. Wohlforth, Jeffrey W. Legro, and Andrew Moravcsik. "Brother, can you spare a paradigm?(Or was anybody ever a realist?)." IS 25, no. 1 (2000): 165. • Lake, David A. “Theory is Dead, Long Live Theory: The End of the Great Debates and the Rise of Eclecticism in International Relations,” EJIR 19, 3 (2013), pp.567- 587. • Ayoob, Mohammed. The Third World security predicament: state making, regional conflict, and the international system. L. Rienner Publishers, 1995. • Tickner, J. Ann. Gender in international relations: Feminist perspectives on achieving global security. Columbia University Press, 1992. • Wœver, Ole. “The Sociology of a Not So International Discipline: American and European Developments in International Relations,” IO 52, 4 (1998), pp.687-727. INTERNATIONAL ORDER • March, James G., and Johan P. Olsen. "The institutional dynamics of international political orders." IO 52, no. 04 (1998): 943-969. • Lake, David A. Hierarchy in International Relations. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2009. • Ikenberry, G. John. After victory: Institutions, strategic restraint, and the rebuilding of order after major wars. Princeton University Press, 2009. • Krasner, Stephen D. Sovereignty: organized hypocrisy. Princeton University Press, 1999. • Cooley, Alexander and Hendrik Spruyt. Contracting states: Sovereign transfers in international relations. Princeton University Press, 2009. REGIMES AND INSTITUTIONS Keohane, Robert O., and Lisa L. Martin. "The promise of institutionalist theory." IS 20, no. 1 (1995): 39-51. • Martin, Lisa L., and Beth A. Simmons, eds. International Institutions: An IO reader. MIT Press, 2001. • Mearsheimer, John "The false promise of international institutions." IS (1994): 5. • Busch, Marc L. "Overlapping institutions, forum shopping, and dispute settlement in international trade." IO 61, no. 04 (2007): 735-761. • Davis, Christina L. Food fights over free trade: how international institutions promote agricultural trade liberalization. Princeton University Press, 2003. • Haas, Ernst B. Beyond the nation state: Functionalism and IO. ECPR Press, 2008. COOPERATION • James Fearon, “Bargaining, Enforcement, and International Cooperation,” IO, 52, 2 (1998), pp.269-305. 2 • Downs, George W., David M. Rocke, and Peter N. Barsoom. "Is the good news about compliance good news about cooperation?." IO 50, no. 03 (1996): 379-406. (In Martin and Simmons, 2001) • Jervis, Robert. "Cooperation under the security dilemma." World Politics 30, no. 02 (1978): 167-214. • Martin, Lisa L. Coercive cooperation: Explaining multilateral economic sanctions. Princeton University Press, 1993. • Oye, Kenneth A.Cooperation under anarchy. Princeton University Press, 1986. NORMS, IDEAS, AND IDENTITY • Keck, Margaret and Kathryn Sikkink, Activists Beyond Borders. (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1998). • Philpott, Daniel. Revolutions in sovereignty: How ideas shaped modern international relations. Princeton University Press, 2001. • Finnemore, Martha. National interests in international society. Cornell University Press,1996. • Mueller, John E. Retreat from doomsday: The obsolescence of major war. New York: Basic Books, 1989. • Klotz, Audie. "Norms reconstituting interests: global racial equality and US sanctions against South Africa." IO 49, no. 03 (1995): 451-478. • Hymans, Jacques. "The changing color of money: European currency iconography and collective identity." EJIR 10, no. 1 (2004): 5-31. INTERNATIONAL LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS • Bass, Gary. Stay the Hand of Vengence: the politics of war crimes tribunals. Princeton University Press, 2000. • Abbott, Kenneth W. and Duncan Snidal. "Hard and soft law in international governance." IO 54, no. 03 (2000): 421-456. • Goldsmith, Jack L., and Eric A. Posner. The limits of international law. Vol. 199. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005. • Franck, Thomas M., Fairness in international law and institutions. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995. • Koh, Harold Hongju. "Why do nations obey international law?." (1997): 2599. Human Rights • Simmons, Beth A. Mobilizing for human rights: international law in domestic politics. Cambridge University Press, 2009. • Hafner-Burton, Emilie. Making human rights a reality. Princeton University Press, 2013. • Conrad, Courtenay Ryals, and Will H. Moore. "What stops the torture?."American Journal of Political Science 54, no. 2 (2010): 459-476. • Fariss, Christopher J. "Respect for Human Rights has Improved Over Time: Modeling the Changing Standard of Accountability." APSR (2014): 1-22. VII. States, Groups and Individuals (Second and First Image) 3 Individuals • Institute of international studies (Berkeley, Calif.). Structure of decision: The cognitive maps of political elites. Edited by Robert M. Axelrod. Vol. 404. Princeton University Press, 1976. • Byman, Daniel L., and Kenneth M. Pollack. "Let us now praise great men: bringing the statesman back in." IS 25, no. 4 (2001): 107-146. • Hudson, Valerie M. "Foreign Policy Analysis: Actor‐Specific Theory and the Ground of International Relations." Foreign Policy Analysis 1, no. 1 (2005): 1-30. States/Groups • Tajfel, Henri, and John C. Turner. "An integrative theory of intergroup conflict." The social psychology of intergroup relations 33, no. 47 (1979): 74. • Putnam, Robert D. "Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games." IO 42, no. 03 (1988): 427-460. • Gourevitch, Peter. "The second image reversed: the international sources of domestic politics." IO 32, no. 04 (1978): 881-912. • Stephan, Maria J., and Erica Chenoweth. "Why civil resistance works: The strategic logic of nonviolent conflict." IS 33, no. 1 (2008): 7-44. METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES AND CRITIQUES IN IR Approaches • King, Gary, Robert O. Keohane, and Sidney Verba. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Interference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994. • Bennett, Andrew and Alexander George. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2005. • Lave, Charles A. and James G. March. An introduction to models in the social sciences. University Press of America, 1993. • Findley, Michael G., Daniel L. Nielson, and J.C. Sharman, “Using Field Experiments in International Relations: A Randomized Study of Anonymous Incorporation,” IO 67, 4 (2013), pp.657-693. • Goldgeier, James M. and Philip E. Tetlock. "Psychology and international relations theory." Annual Review of Political Science 4, no. 1 (2001): 67-92. • Mahoney, James and Gary Goertz. "A tale of two cultures: Contrasting quantitative and qualitative research." Political Analysis 14, no. 3 (2006): 227. • Bernstein, Steven, Richard Ned Lebow, Janice Gross Stein, and Steven Weber. "God gave physics the easy problems: adapting social science to an unpredictable world." EJIR 6, no. 1 (2000): 43-76. Rationality • Popper, Karl Raimund. "Of clouds and clocks: an approach to the problem of rationality and the freedom of man." Thinking Clearly about Psychology: Essays on Matters of Public Interest 1 (1991): 100. • Simon, Herbert Alexander. Models of bounded rationality: Empirically grounded economic reason. Vol. 3. MIT press, 1982. • Kahler, Miles. "Rationality in international relations." IO 52, no. 04 (1998): 919. 4 • Milner, Helen V. "Rationalizing
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In Search of Democratic Peace: Problems and Promise Author(S): Steve Chan Reviewed Work(S): Source: Mershon International Studies Review, Vol
    In Search of Democratic Peace: Problems and Promise Author(s): Steve Chan Reviewed work(s): Source: Mershon International Studies Review, Vol. 41, No. 1 (May, 1997), pp. 59-91 Published by: Blackwell Publishing on behalf of The International Studies Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/222803 . Accessed: 03/01/2012 11:13 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Blackwell Publishing and The International Studies Association are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Mershon International Studies Review. http://www.jstor.org Mershon International Studies Review (1997) 41, 59-91 In Search of Democratic Peace: Problems and Promise STEVE CHAN Department of Political Science, University of Colorado This essay reviews the growing literature on the democratic peace. It assesses the evidence on whether democracies are more peaceful and, if so, in what ways. This assessment considers the match and mismatch among the data, methods, and theories generally used in exploring these questions. The review also examines the empirical support for several explanations of the democratic peace phenomenon. It concludes with some observations and suggestions for future research. Are democracies more peaceful in their foreign relations? If so, what are the theoretical explanations and policy implications of this phenomenon? These ques- tions have been the focus of much recent international relations research.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Cheers for Bargaining Theory Two Cheers for David A
    Two Cheers for Bargaining Theory Two Cheers for David A. Lake Bargaining Theory Assessing Rationalist Explanations of the Iraq War The Iraq War has been one of the most signiªcant events in world politics since the end of the Cold War. One of the ªrst preventive wars in history, it cost trillions of dollars, re- sulted in more than 4,500 U.S. and coalition casualties (to date), caused enor- mous suffering in Iraq, and may have spurred greater anti-Americanism in the Middle East even while reducing potential threats to the United States and its allies. Yet, despite its profound importance, the causes of the war have re- ceived little sustained analysis from scholars of international relations.1 Al- though there have been many descriptions of the lead-up to the war, the ªghting, and the occupation, these largely journalistic accounts explain how but not why the war occurred.2 In this article, I assess a leading academic theory of conºict—the rationalist approach to war or, simply, bargaining theory—as one possible explanation of the Iraq War.3 Bargaining theory is currently the dominant approach in conºict David A. Lake is Jerri-Ann and Gary E. Jacobs Professor of Social Sciences, Distinguished Professor of Political Science, and Associate Dean of Social Sciences at the University of California, San Diego. He is the author, most recently, of Hierarchy in International Relations (Cornell University Press, 2009). The author is indebted to Peter Gourevitch, Stephan Haggard, Miles Kahler, James Long, Rose McDermott, Etel Solingen, and Barbara Walter for helpful discussions on Iraq or comments on this article.
    [Show full text]
  • KRISTIN MARIE BAKKE Curriculum Vitae October 2016
    KRISTIN MARIE BAKKE Curriculum Vitae October 2016 University College London Department of Political Science 29/30 Tavistock Square Phone: +44 (0)207 679 4983 The Rubin Building E-mail: [email protected] London WC1H 9QU, UK Twitter: @KristinMBakke Employment Professor, Department of Political Science and the Program on European Social and Political Studies, University College London, Oct. 2016-present. Senior Lecturer, Oct. 2013-Sept. 2016. Lecturer, Sept. 2009-Sept. 2013. Associate Research Professor, Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO), Sept. 2016-present. Associate Senior Researcher, Jan. 2009-Dec. 2009, March 2015-Aug. 2016. Associate Researcher, Jan. 2008-Dec. 2008. Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Leiden University, Aug. 2008-Sept. 2009. Post-Doctoral Research Fellow, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard University, Sept. 2007-July 2008. Education PhD in Political Science, University of Washington, Seattle, 2007. Fields: Comparative Politics, International Relations, Post-Communist Studies. MA in Political Science, University of Washington, Seattle, 2003. BA in Journalism and Political Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, 2000. Semester Units in Philosophy and Theater Theory, University of Oslo (Norway), 1998. One-Year Course in Political Science, Østfold College, Halden (Norway), 1997. Book Bakke, Kristin M. 2015. Decentralization and Intrastate Struggles: Chechnya, Punjab, and Québec. New York: Cambridge University Press. Recipient of the Conflict Research Society’s Book of the Year Award, 2016. Journal Articles Seymour, Lee J.M., Kristin M. Bakke, and Kathleen Gallagher Cunningham. 2016. “E Pluribus Unum, Ex Uno Plures: Competition, Violence, and Fragmentation in Ethnopolitical Movements.” Journal of Peace Research 53 (1): 3-18. Bakke, Kristin M., John O’Loughlin, Gerard Toal, and Michael D.
    [Show full text]
  • STILL LOOKING for AUDIENCE COSTS Erik Gartzke and Yonatan
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Essex Research Repository STILL LOOKING FOR AUDIENCE COSTS Erik Gartzke and Yonatan Lupu Eighteen years after publication of James Fearon’s article stressing the importance of domestic audience costs in international crisis bargaining, we continue to look for clear evidence to support or falsify his argument. 1 Notwithstanding the absence of a compelling empirical case for or against audience costs, much of the discipline has grown fond of Fearon’s basic framework. A key reason for the importance of Fearon’s claims has been the volume of theories that build on the hypothesis that leaders subject to popular rule are better able to generate audience costs. Scholars have relied on this logic, for example, to argue that democracies are more likely to win the wars they fight, 2 that democracies are more reliable allies, 3 and as an explanation for the democratic peace. 4 A pair of recent studies, motivated largely by limitations in the research designs of previous projects, offers evidence the authors interpret as contradicting audience cost theory. 5 Although we share the authors’ ambivalence about audience costs, we are not convinced by their evidence. What one seeks in looking for audience costs is evidence of a causal mechanism, not just of a causal effect. Historical case studies can be better suited to detecting causal mechanisms Erik Gartzke is an associate professor in the Department of Political Science, University of California, San Diego.Yonatan Lupu is a Postdoctoral Research Associate at Princeton University.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Science 617 Topics and Debates in International Relations
    Political Science 617 Topics and Debates in International Relations Professor Alex Weisiger Monday 4-7 Office: 215 Stiteler Hall Seminar Room: Meyerson Hall B6 Email: [email protected] Office Hours: MW 2:30-3:30 This course is designed to introduce students to current topics and debates in the study of international relations, focusing primarily on international security. It thus is intended to com- plement PSCI 600, the IR field seminar, which is designed to introduce students to foundational works in international relations but which generally does not cover current debates in any depth. Although PSCI 600 is not a formal prerequisite for this course, reading assignments and discus- sions will generally assume that students are already familiar with that material; thus, students who have not taken 600 will be at a significant disadvantage. Course Requirements Students are expected to come to class each week ready to discuss the assigned readings. In addition, for two weeks of the course you will be responsible for writing and circulating a short (2-4 page) memo that briefly outlines the key questions and arguments in the week, presents questions for discussion, and suggests ways in which outstanding questions might be answered (e.g. novel hypotheses for testing, potential new data sources, or ways to apply existing data in novel ways to distinguish among competing arguments). Each week, one student will also be responsible for a short (no more than 10 minute) presentation on an existing dataset in international relations. See below for details. The final assignment for the course is a substantial publishable-quality research paper.
    [Show full text]
  • ALEXANDER B. DOWNES the George Washington University
    ALEXANDER B. DOWNES The George Washington University Elliott School of International Affairs Phone: (202) 994-7859 1957 E St. NW, #605B Fax: (202) 994-7761 Washington, DC 20052 Email: [email protected] ACADEMIC POSITIONS 2011- Associate Professor (with tenure), Department of Political Science and Elliott School of International Affairs, The George Washington University 2004-11 Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Duke University 2007/08 Post-doctoral Fellowship, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University 2003/04 Post-doctoral Fellowship, Center for International Security and Cooperation (CISAC), Stanford University EDUCATION 2004 Ph.D. in Political Science, University of Chicago 1998 M.A. in International Relations (Honors), University of Chicago 1991 B.A. in Music (Magna cum laude), Brown University 1991-94 Graduate Work in Orchestral Double Bass Performance, Indiana University (School of Music) PUBLICATIONS Book Targeting Civilians in War (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 2008). • Winner of the Joseph Lepgold Book Prize, given by Georgetown University for best book on international relations published in 2008. Journal Articles & Book Chapters “No Business Like FIRC Business: Foreign-Imposed Regime Change and Bilateral Trade,” British Journal of Political Science (published online, August 3, 2015; with Paul Zachary and Kathleen Deloughery). “Correspondence: Reevaluating Foreign-Imposed Regime Change,” International Security 38, no. 3 (Winter 2013/14): 184-195 (with Jonathan Monten). “Forced to Be Free: Why Foreign-Imposed Regime Change Rarely Leads to Democratization,” International Security 37, no. 4 (Spring 2013): 90-131 (with Jonathan Monten). “The Illusion of Democratic Credibility,” International Organization 66, no. 3 (Summer 2012): 457-489 (with Todd S.
    [Show full text]
  • Triggering Nationalist Violence Triggering Nationalist Adria Lawrence Violence Competition and Conºict in Uprisings Against Colonial Rule
    Triggering Nationalist Violence Triggering Nationalist Adria Lawrence Violence Competition and Conºict in Uprisings against Colonial Rule What causes nonstate actors to take up arms and wage war against the state? Despite a burgeoning literature on civil war, extrasystemic war, and terrorism, scholars continue to lack compelling explanations for the onset of civil violence. The existing litera- ture has examined variation in political violence along a number of different dimensions, including the incidence of rebellion and civil war,1 the distribu- tion of violence within civil wars,2 the behavior of violent actors toward civil- ians,3 popular support for violent actors,4 and the use of particular types of violence.5 Yet less is known about how and why violence erupts in the ªrst Adria Lawrence is Assistant Professor of Political Science at Yale University and a research fellow at the MacMillan Center for International and Area Studies. From 2007 to 2008, she was a research fellow at the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at Harvard University. The author would like to acknowledge Ana De La O, Thad Dunning, Jeff Goodwin, Jenna Jordan, Stathis Kalyvas, Harris Mylonas, David Patel, Roger Petersen, Mustapha Qadery, Keven Ruby, Jonah Schulhofer-Wohl, Susan Stokes, Lisa Wedeen, Elizabeth Wood, the anonymous reviewers, and participants at workshops at Harvard University, the Massachusetts Institute of Technol- ogy, and Yale University for comments and helpful suggestions on earlier drafts. Special thanks are owed to Matthew Kocher for his advice and feedback. Many thanks to Younes Amehraye for research assistance in Morocco. 1. For examples, see Paul Collier and Anke Hoefºer, “Greed and Grievance in Civil War” (Oxford: Center for the Study of African Economics, March 2002); Nicholas Sambanis, “What Is a Civil War? Conceptual and Empirical Complexities of an Operational Deªnition,” Journal of Conºict Res- olution, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • James Fearon on Conflict-Prone Societies, Defining Ethnicity and Reforming the United Nations Security Council
    Theory Talks Presents THEORY TALK #18 JAMES FEARON ON CONFLICT-PRONE SOCIETIES, DEFINING ETHNICITY AND REFORMING THE UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL Theory Talks is an interactive forum for discussion on actual International Relations-related topics for both students and specialists. Theory Talks frequently invites cutting-edge specialists in the field to open a debate, discuss current issues or elucidate a theory. Citation: Schouten, P (2008) ‘Theory Talk #18: James Fearon on Conflict-Prone Societies, Defining Ethnicity and Reforming the United Nations Security Council’, Theory Talks, http://www.theory-talks.org/2008/09/theory-talk-18.html (23-09-2008) WWW.THEORY-TALKS.ORG JAMES FEARON ON CONFLICT-PRONE SOCIETIES, DEFINING ETHNICITY AND REFORMING THE UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL James D. Fearon is known for his research on ethnic conflict, but has published on issues varying from the external validity of concepts in IR to reforming international institutions to IR- methodology. In this Talk, Fearon explains how one can work with concepts as vague as ‘ethnicity’, what the chances are of the United Nations being reformed, and why he thinks the big theoretical debates don’t matter that much. What is, according to you, the biggest challenge / principal debate in current IR? What is your position or answer to this challenge / in this debate? When talking about the principal debates, your question would have been easier to answer a couple of years ago. I don’t know that I would say that IR is in a post-big-debate phase, but attention certainly has shifted from the grand debates between all kinds of ‘isms’ and methodologies to more concrete issues.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 PS 247A Quantitative Approaches to International Relations Fall Quarter 2004 SSB 104, Wednesday 5:00-7:50 PM Kristian Skrede G
    PS 247A Quantitative Approaches to International Relations Fall Quarter 2004 SSB 104, Wednesday 5:00-7:50 PM Kristian Skrede Gleditsch [email protected], SSB 383 Tel: (858) 822 0535 (Please note that I don’t use voice mail, email is much better) Office Hours: Tuesday 9.30-11.30 and by appointment This version: 20 September 2004 Course Description• This course introduces students to quantitative approaches to international relations, with particular emphasis on research on conflict and peace. Since the quantitative international relations literature is so extensive, the particular readings and issues that we cover in this must inevitably be a small and somewhat idiosyncratic sample. However, we will also focus on more general issues and generic skills in empirical analysis that have wider applicability in international relations research beyond the specific readings assigned. The course will also focus on how to go beyond consuming or evaluating the research of others to become active contributors and improve on existing research. There are two assignments for this class. First, you must submit two short (3-5 pp.) papers summarizing the readings for a particular week. These short papers should be distributed to the class ahead of the meeting time. Each student preparing a paper for given week – possibly in collaboration with other students – should prepare a short class presentation and be prepared to lead discussion. The goal of this exercise is not simply to summarize the assigned readings as others in the class already will be familiar with these. Rather, a good summary will discuss the broader issues, themes, and questions underlying the readings or identify problems with research design and potential flaws in the particular articles, and serve as a starting point for in-class discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Partipant Bios
    Workshop on Ethical Engagement in Conflict Research Workshop Participants Kanisha Bond | University of Maryland My research focuses on internal conflict, contentious politics and social movement organizational Behavior. I am particularly interested in the ways in which people Become moBilized into political action, how social movement organizations recruit and manage their memBership, and how these internal processes influence inter-group collaboration. My work in these areas has Been puBlished in top academic outlets, including the American Political Science Review, the British Journal of Political Science, and the Journal International Negotiation. I am currently working on two large research proJects. The first is a Book proJect that focuses on the development of collaborative relationships among violent political organizations in the Americas over the last half-century; the second examines systematic differences in the form, content and organization of women’s participation in violent social movements across world regions. I currently teach graduate and undergraduate courses on terrorism, civil war, social movements and research design. I also serve as a faculty mentor for the McNair Scholars Program and the START Center’s Expanding Access to Security Studies Education initiative. Karen Brounéus | Uppsala University, Sweden Karen Brounéus is Associate Professor (docent) in Peace and Conflict Research and Director of Studies at the Department of Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala University, Sweden. Her research focuses on i.a. truth and reconciliation processes after intrastate armed conflict; the gendered dimensions of war and peace; psychological health in post conflict peaceBuilding; psychological health in soldiers returning from peacekeeping operations; and the effect of dialogue in inter-ethnic conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • POLITICAL SCIENCE 240/IRGN 254 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THEORY Fall 2010 Wednesday, 12:00 PM-2:50 PM SSB 107 Erik Gartzke Email
    POLITICAL SCIENCE 240/IRGN 254 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THEORY Fall 2010 Wednesday, 12:00 PM-2:50 PM SSB 107 Erik Gartzke Email: [email protected] Office hours: Tuesdays, 11-1 PM SSB 327 This course is designed for first year Ph.D. students. It explores major concepts and key research approaches in the field of international relations. The following books are available for purchase on-line and at the UCSD bookstore. Lars-Erik Cederman, Emergent Actors in World Politics: How States and Nations Develop and Dissolve (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997) [ISBN: 0691021481]. Margaret E. Keck and Kathryn Sikkink, Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1998). [ISBN: 0801484561] David A. Lake and Robert Powell, eds., Strategic Choice and International Relations (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999). [ISBN: 0691026971] Helen V. Milner, Interests, Institutions, and Information: Domestic Politics and International Relations (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997). [ISBN: 0691011761] Robert Powell, In the Shadow of Power: States and Strategies in International Politics (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999). [ISBN: 0691004579] R. Harrison Wagner, War and the State: The Theory of International Politics. (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2007). [ISBN: 0472069810] Kenneth N. Waltz, Theory of International Politics (Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press, 1979). [ISBN: 1577666704] Copies of these books are also on reserve at the IR/PS library. Other readings are available online (UCSD Library). Reading the “additional reading” is not required. Course requirements: Written: three five-page papers (each 25% of grade). Each paper will analyze one or more of the readings assigned for the week.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Victory Dan Reiter and Allan C
    Understanding Victory Understanding Victory Dan Reiter and Allan C. Stam Why Political Institutions Matter In our book, Democ- racies at War, we asked the question: Why do democracies tend to win the wars they ªght? We conªrmed this pattern, ªrst noted by David Lake in his “Power- ful Paciªsts” article, using statistical tests and numerous historical cases.1 No- tably, this phenomenon confounds the traditional realpolitik fear that democratic liberalism is a luxury that states may be unable to afford. Our basic answer to the question is that democracies tend to win because they put them- selves in a position to do so. The constraints that ºow from democratic politi- cal structures lead the executives of liberal democracies to hesitate before starting wars, particularly wars where victory on the battleªeld appears to be less than clear-cut. Democracies’ willingness to start wars only against relatively weaker states says nothing about the actual military efªciency or capacity of democratic states. Rather, it says that when they do start a ªght, they are more likely to pick on relatively weaker target states. We also ªnd, however, that in addition to this “selection effects” explanation of democratic success, democratic armies enjoy a small advantage on the battleªeld. Michael Desch, a prominent realist scholar, reviews these claims in his article “Democracy and Victory: Why Regime Type Hardly Matters.”2 His assertion that regime type is irrelevant to the probability of military victory is consistent with the broader realist agenda, which argues that domestic politics matters little in the formation of foreign policy or the interactions between states.
    [Show full text]