DOCSLIB.ORG

YESALLWOMEN: Narrative Response to Gendered Violence

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
YESALLWOMEN: Narrative Response to Gendered Violence #YESALLWOMEN: Narrative Response to Gendered Violence Megan McIntyre Sonoma State University Present Tense, Vol. 8, Issue 1, 2019. http://www.presenttensejournal.org | [email protected] Sex Doesn’t Sell: Bitchmedia’s Schema for Effective Branding and Financial Viability Megan McIntyre Clayton Sandell: Elliot Rodger left disturbing hints, starting with those chilling YouTube videos. Elliot Rodger: I’ll be a god, exacting my retribution on all those who deserve it. Clayton Sandell: And this 141-page manifesto, detailing the troubled life of an alleged killer, from childhood bullying, sibling rivalry, fantasies about killing his father and step-mother, and his Annotated transcript for the video essay: most repeated grievance, being rejected by women. Narrator: On May 23, 2014, Elliot Rodger, a 22- year-old student at Santa Barbara City College, Elliot Rodger: Girls gave their affection and sex murdered his three roommates. Then he drove and love to other men, but never to me. to the sorority houses just off the campus of the nearby University of California at Santa Barbara. Narrator: Almost four years later, and a few There, he shot three women outside their thousand miles away, Alek Minassian, a recent sorority house. Two of these women died of graduate of Toronto’s Seneca College, used a their wounds. From there, he drove around van to murder 10 pedestrians on a downtown Santa Barbara, seemingly at random, shooting at Toronto street. He framed his attack as another buildings and bystanders, one of whom died, front in the “Incel Rebellion.” “We will overthrow and hitting pedestrians with his vehicle. When all the Chads and Stacys,” he wrote on Facebook police finally located that vehicle, they found just before the attack, and in his final words Roger inside, dead of a self-inflicted gunshot online, before the murders, he turned to a hero. wound. Between murdering his roommates and “All hail the Supreme Gentleman, Elliot Rodger.” shooting the three women in front of their sorority house, Rodger uploaded video to Det. Gibson: The accused is alleged to have YouTube and emailed out a diatribe in which he posted a cryptic message on Facebook, minutes details his motives for the series of personal and before he began driving the rented van. random attacks that left six dead and 14 wounded. Diana Swain: That post begins with what may be a reference to his failed Army experience. Elliot Rodger: Elliot Rodger, here. “Private Recruit Minassian Infantry,” and, then, 1 “The Incel Rebellion has already begun. All hail all too predictable conversational turn. These the Supreme Gentleman, Elliot Rodger.” first responses, #YesAllWomen, tell the story of what it’s like to be, to live, to work, to act, as Elliot Rodger: I don’t know why you girls aren’t women constantly faced with your own physical attracted to me, but I will punish you all for it. and social vulnerability. Narrator: After both attacks, commentary online Narrator: As #YesAllWomen gained steam swiftly turned to an investigation of the digital online, Sasha Weiss, writing for The New Yorker, communities that had harbored both murderers. argued that the emerging conversations and The Twitterati bemoaned the lack of insight into narratives were a function of Twitter as a the Incel community and discovered, seemingly rhetorical and compositional space. “There is for the first time, the pool of horrifying misogyny something about the fact that Twitter is lurking in various corners of the Internet. As we primarily designed for speech, for short, strong, once more grapple with gender violence, what declarative utterance, that makes it an especially lessons might we learn from the digital powerful vehicle for activism, a place of responses to these horrific crimes? Looking at liberation.” the digital aftermath of Rodger’s crimes in particular might offer some insight into how Narrator: As Weiss notes, the kinds of Tweets women use digital spaces to reembody making up the #YesAllWomen space were themselves in the face of such dehumanizing uniquely personal, specific, and narratively attacks. powerful. Instead of making arguments about the abstract heart of misogyny, about how it Narrator: As things often do in the 2010s, fear, does theoretical or general violence, physical, anger, and analysis of Rodger’s attacks quickly emotional, mental to women and to men, expanded across Twitter, after the discovery of women told stories on #YesAllWomen. They his YouTube channel, and conversation quickly offered brief snapshots of their daily lives. They returned to an all-too-popular theme when it described the fear, inculcated from puberty or comes to violence against women, the defensive before by well-meaning adults, that rejoinder that not all men are like Rodger. accompanies growing up as a woman. They #NotAllMen, already an established tag prior to talked about their own sexual assaults. They the Isla Vista murders, reemerged. talked about what it’s like to feel consistently, constantly vulnerable. Narrator: As part of this hashtag, men concerned that women’s anger was too broadly focused, Narrator: This kind of storytelling is a way, I’d start to preemptively remind women that not all argue, of reembodying themselves in digital men were murderers, not all men were angry space. As Jenny Sunden notes in her 2003 and abusive, not all men. book, Material Virtualities, “The virtual does not automatically equate to disembodiment,” but, Narrator: Instead of preempting conversations too often in our arguments in virtual space, we about the role of men in the perpetuation of aren’t asked to engage with the bodily misogyny, #NotAllMen produced an almost experience of our interlocutor. immediate response from women weary of the 2 Narrator: I’d like to pause here for a moment to Narrator: Complex displays of self allow users to define my terms. When I speak of embodiment remix identity and bodily form, to reembody here, I am particularly interested in rhetorically- themselves in endless combinations and inflected definitions of the term. In a 2015 Key relationships. These acts of relation create Concept Piece in Peitho, Maureen Johnson, “complex mediated life worlds where inscription Daisy Levy, Katie Manthey, and Maria Novotny is no longer metaphoric practice, but an act of call for a sense of rhetorical embodiment that pre-self, real world, environmental coupling, acknowledges that all bodies do rhetoric inadequate to be viewed from the perspective through texture, shape, color, consistency, of discursive representation.” movement, and function. These others also remind us the bodies themselves have Narrator: Similarly, Sunden argues the virtual signifying power that they “connect individuals might best be seen as an extension of the and groups to others in complex arrangements corporeal rather than an incarnation of the characterized by power distribution, access, and textual. The storytelling we see in mobility” (40). #YesAllWomen calls our attention to the movement of bodies and space. It forces us to Narrator: This vision of embodiment, where attend to the corporeal rather than just the bodies are central to rhetorical action and are textual. always performing rhetorical action, reflects longstanding work in feminist rhetorics. From Narrator: Instead of a wispy ephemera, these Malea Powell’s insistence on recognizing how women rhetors have heft; they walk alone. native bodies are othered, erased, or consumed in settler-colonial discourse, to Kristin Arola’s Narrator: Make eye contact and take lunch argument that our bodies are both mediating breaks. and mediated, to Anne Wysocki’s attention to the ways that our experiences of digital Narrator: Speak back and have bodies. mediation are built on an often invisible foundation of “messy, gendered, raced, aging, Narrator: Have need to protect those bodies. nationalized, digesting bodies.” Narrator: They are stared at by strangers as they Narrator: Returning then to questions of digital walk the streets. embodiment, specifically, Lissa Holloway- Attaway makes a complimentary argument. Narrator: They go to bars. Writing in Digital Humanities Quarterly in 2012, Holloway-Attaway argues that social media Narrator: They carry keys and walk home. spaces can best be seen as mixed reality spaces, neither fully digital, nor fully bodily. “Because of Narrator: They wear glasses. this mixed reality orientation,” she says, these spaces offer “possibilities for displaying one’s Narrator: They wear shorts. self, for performing one’s experiences in complex ways.” Narrator: They are groped. 3 Narrator: Harassed. Works Cited Narrator: Violated. American Broadcasting Company. “Alleged Gunman Elliot Rodger’s Chilling Manifesto.” Narrator: They say, “Yes.” They say, “No.” YouTube, uploaded by ABC News, 26 May 2014, https://youtu.be/7ueXSePMeq0. Narrator: These are concrete women. They tell stories, and with these stories, reinscribe their Arola, Kristin L. and Anne Frances Wysocki. bodily identity in this virtual space, and, in doing Composing Media Composing Embodiment. so, in making themselves more physically Logan: Utah State University Press, 2012. present, they force us to see them more clearly. They force us to engage them, to recognize their Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. stories, to respond to their experiences. “Investigating Van Attack Suspect Alek Minassian’s Past.” YouTube, uploaded by CBC Narrator: Now what? Now, too, in the aftermath News: The National, 24 April 2018, of Minassian’s attack, women once again raised https://youtu.be/l2CYm5DTgsA. their voices. They offer insight into their experiences. They remind the commentariat Holloway-Attaway, Lissa. “Beyond that we’ve already had this conversation before, Representation: Embodied Expression and that we’ve warned about the dangers of online Social Media.” Digital Humanities Quarterly, communities that radicalize aggrieved men and vol. 6, no.2, 2012. champion acts of gender violence. We have already witnessed this horror and been forced to Johnson, Maureen, Daisy Levy, Katie Manthey, proclaim our embodied humanity. Perhaps and Maria Novotny. “Embodiment: Embodying these embodied responses might once again act Feminist Rhetorics.” Peitho, vol.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Intersectional Feminist Approach
    GUIDING PRINCIPLE 1 AN INTERSECTIONAL FEMINIST APPROACH An intersectional approach to feminism acknowledges that while women share similar experiences of discrimination, harassment, sexism, inequality and oppression on the basis of their sex and gender, not all women are equally disadvantaged or have equal access to resources, power and privilege. An intersectional approach to feminism requires analysis and action that is not only gendered, but considers how other forms of systemic oppression and discrimination – such as racism, homophobia, transphobia, biphobia or ableism – can intersect with and impact on women’s experiences of gender, inequality, discrimination, harassment, violence or abuse. In the context of addressing violence against women, an intersectional approach recognises that the way women experience gender and inequality can be different based on a range of other cultural, individual, historical, environmental or structural factors including (but not limited to) race, age, geographic location, sexual orientation, ability or class. This approach also recognises that the drivers, dynamics and impacts of violence women experience can be compounded and magnified by their experience of other forms of oppression and inequality, resulting in some groups of women experiencing higher rates and/or more severe forms of violence, or facing barriers to support and safety that other women do not experience. DVRCV stands in solidarity with and supports work that addresses other forms of discrimination and oppression. We actively promote and give voice to this work and support those leading it to consider gender in their approach, just as we consider how our work to address violence against women can challenge other forms of oppression that women experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender Inequality and Restrictive Gender Norms: Framing the Challenges to Health
    Series Gender Equality, Norms, and Health 1 Gender inequality and restrictive gender norms: framing the challenges to health Lori Heise*, Margaret E Greene*, Neisha Opper, Maria Stavropoulou, Caroline Harper, Marcos Nascimento, Debrework Zewdie, on behalf of the Gender Equality, Norms, and Health Steering Committee† Lancet 2019; 393: 2440–54 Gender is not accurately captured by the traditional male and female dichotomy of sex. Instead, it is a complex social Published Online system that structures the life experience of all human beings. This paper, the first in a Series of five papers, investigates May 30, 2019 the relationships between gender inequality, restrictive gender norms, and health and wellbeing. Building upon past http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ work, we offer a consolidated conceptual framework that shows how individuals born biologically male or female S0140-6736(19)30652-X develop into gendered beings, and how sexism and patriarchy intersect with other forms of discrimination, such as See Comment pages 2367, 2369, 2371, 2373, and 2374 racism, classism, and homophobia, to structure pathways to poor health. We discuss the ample evidence showing the This is the first in a Series of far-reaching consequences of these pathways, including how gender inequality and restrictive gender norms impact five papers about gender health through differential exposures, health-related behaviours and access to care, as well as how gender-biased health equality, norms, and health research and health-care systems reinforce and reproduce gender inequalities, with serious implications for health. *Joint first authors The cumulative consequences of structured disadvantage, mediated through discriminatory laws, policies, and †Members of the Steering institutions, as well as diet, stress, substance use, and environmental toxins, have triggered important discussions Committee are listed at the end about the role of social injustice in the creation and maintenance of health inequities, especially along racial and of this Series paper socioeconomic lines.
    [Show full text]
  • Intersectionality and Feminist Politics Yuval-Davis, Nira
    www.ssoar.info Intersectionality and Feminist Politics Yuval-Davis, Nira Postprint / Postprint Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Zur Verfügung gestellt in Kooperation mit / provided in cooperation with: www.peerproject.eu Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Yuval-Davis, N. (2006). Intersectionality and Feminist Politics. European Journal of Women's Studies, 13(3), 193-209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506806065752 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter dem "PEER Licence Agreement zur This document is made available under the "PEER Licence Verfügung" gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zum PEER-Projekt finden Agreement ". For more Information regarding the PEER-project Sie hier: http://www.peerproject.eu Gewährt wird ein nicht see: http://www.peerproject.eu This document is solely intended exklusives, nicht übertragbares, persönliches und beschränktes for your personal, non-commercial use.All of the copies of Recht auf Nutzung dieses Dokuments. Dieses Dokument this documents must retain all copyright information and other ist ausschließlich für den persönlichen, nicht-kommerziellen information regarding legal protection. You are not allowed to alter Gebrauch bestimmt. Auf sämtlichen Kopien dieses Dokuments this document in any way, to copy it for public or commercial müssen alle Urheberrechtshinweise und sonstigen Hinweise purposes, to exhibit the document in public, to perform, distribute auf gesetzlichen Schutz beibehalten werden. Sie dürfen dieses or otherwise use the document in public. Dokument nicht in irgendeiner Weise abändern, noch dürfen By using this particular document, you accept the above-stated Sie dieses Dokument für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke conditions of use. vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, aufführen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. Mit der Verwendung dieses Dokuments erkennen Sie die Nutzungsbedingungen an.
    [Show full text]
  • The Critical Issues Copyright © 2016, United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) Job No: DEW/1970/NA ISBN: 978-92-807-3550-5
    www.unep.org United Nations Environment Programme P.O. Box 30552, Nairobi 00100, Kenya Tel: +254-(0)20-762 1234 Email: [email protected] web: www.unep.org Around the world, environmental conditions impact the lives of women and men in different ways as a result of existing inequalities. Gender roles often create differences in the ways men and women act in relation to the environment, and in the ways men and women are enabled or prevented from acting as agents of environmental change. UNEP and partners developed the Global Gender and 2016 Environment Outlook (GGEO), following the request of the Network of Women Ministers and Leaders for the Environment (NWMLE). The report aims GLOBAL GENDER AND to support governments in understanding the potential roles of men and women as agents of change and subsequently support ENVIRONMENT OUTLOOK development and implementation of gender- sensitive environmental policies. The Critical Issues Copyright © 2016, United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) Job No: DEW/1970/NA ISBN: 978-92-807-3550-5 Disclaimers The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP concerning the legal status of any country, territory or city or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. For general guidance on matters relating to the use of maps in publications please go to http://www.un.org/Depts/ Cartographic/english/htmain.htm Mention of a commercial company or product in this publication does not imply endorsement by the United Nations Environment Programme.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Complexities of Feminist Perspectives.Pdf
    UNDERSTANDING THE COMPLEXITIES OF FEMINIST PERSPECTIVES ON WOMAN ABUSE: A COMMENTARY ON DONALD G. DUTTON’S RETHINKING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE* Walter S. DeKeseredy, Ph.D. Criminology, Justice and Policy Studies University of Ontario Institute of Technology Oshawa, Ontario Canada L1H 7K4 [email protected] Molly Dragiewicz, Ph.D. Criminology, Justice and Policy Studies University of Ontario Institute of Technology Oshawa, Ontario Canada L1H 7K4 [email protected] *The authors would like to thank Edward G. Gondolf and Claire Renzetti for their helpful comments and criticisms. Please send all correspondence to Walter DeKeseredy, e-mail: [email protected]. UNDERSTANDING THE COMPLEXITIES OF FEMINIST PERSPECTIVES ON WOMAN ABUSE: A COMMENTARY ON DONALD G. DUTTON’S RETHINKING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE All books, including Donald G. Dutton’s (2006) Rethinking Domestic Violence, are written and published in a specific political and economic context. As vividly described by Faludi (1991), Hammer (2002), and many others who made progressive contributions to an interdisciplinary understanding of the enduring discrimination against contemporary North American women, we still live in a climate characterized by vitriolic attacks on feminist scholarship, practice, and activism, intended to secure women’s basic human rights (DeKeseredy & Schwartz, 2003; Stanko, 2006). Despite its title, Dutton’s new book doesn’t focus on rethinking domestic violence. Instead, it is another example of the conservative backlash against feminism in general and feminist research on woman abuse in particular, a response that “helps to veil the extent and brutality of this problem and to block efforts to deal with it” (Hammer, 2002, p. 5). Dutton’s preoccupation with feminism is reflected in entire chapters dedicated to criticizing feminist theory and research, and the book’s “Bottom Line” summary, where half of the main points concern Dutton’s interpretation of feminism rather than new insights about domestic violence research.
    [Show full text]
  • The Woman-Slave Analogy: Rhetorical Foundations in American
    The Woman-Slave Analogy: Rhetorical Foundations in American Culture, 1830-1900 Ana Lucette Stevenson BComm (dist.), BA (HonsI) A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2014 School of History, Philosophy, Religion and Classics I Abstract During the 1830s, Sarah Grimké, the abolitionist and women’s rights reformer from South Carolina, stated: “It was when my soul was deeply moved at the wrongs of the slave that I first perceived distinctly the subject condition of women.” This rhetorical comparison between women and slaves – the woman-slave analogy – emerged in Europe during the seventeenth century, but gained peculiar significance in the United States during the nineteenth century. This rhetoric was inspired by the Revolutionary Era language of liberty versus tyranny, and discourses of slavery gained prominence in the reform culture that was dominated by the American antislavery movement and shared among the sisterhood of reforms. The woman-slave analogy functioned on the idea that the position of women was no better – nor any freer – than slaves. It was used to critique the exclusion of women from a national body politic based on the concept that “all men are created equal.” From the 1830s onwards, this analogy came to permeate the rhetorical practices of social reformers, especially those involved in the antislavery, women’s rights, dress reform, suffrage and labour movements. Sarah’s sister, Angelina, asked: “Can you not see that women could do, and would do a hundred times more for the slave if she were not fettered?” My thesis explores manifestations of the woman-slave analogy through the themes of marriage, fashion, politics, labour, and sex.
    [Show full text]
  • Misogyny Versus Misandry: from “Comparative Suffering” to Inter-Sexual Dialogue
    Misogyny versus Misandry: From “Comparative Suffering” to Inter-Sexual Dialogue Paul NathaNsoN aNd KatheriNe K. Y ouNg One reason for the current polarization between men and women—a situation that has become worse, not better, over the past two or three years—is the lack of any moral or philosophical paradigm for moving beyond polarization. The obstacle is a paradigm, comparative suffering, that leads inevitably toward the mobilization of resentment between various sexual, racial, ethnic, economic, religious or linguistic groups. From this deeply cynical perspective, groups compete in the public square for both moral status and political power by claiming that they alone deserve the status of collective victims and therefore that their adversaries alone deserve the stigma of collective victimizers. This presents NEW MALE STUDIES: AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ~ ISSN 1839-7816 ~ VOL. 3, ISSUE 3, 2014, PP. 72-92 © 2014 AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF MALE HEALTH AND STUDIES. 73 the latter with a very difficult problem: how to establish and maintain a healthy collective identity in the face of pervasive prejudice. At the moment, men are experiencing this problem as acutely as women ever did but without the academic and political resources that feminism has generated during the past half century. One solution would be to replace inter-sexual debate with inter-sexual dialogue. Keywords: feminism; egalitarian feminism; ideological feminism; misandry; misogyny; rape culture; autonomy; victim; victimizer; comparative suffering; mobilization of resentment; identity; vulner - ability; masculine identity; fatherhood; motherhood; single parenthood; inter-sexual debate; and inter-sexual dialogue. introductory Note The following text was originally written to be read as a contribution to a meeting in Detroit, Michi - gan, on July 27-28, 2014, billed as the First International Conference on Men’s Issues, sponsored by “A Voice for Men.” It is presented here in a revised version.
    [Show full text]
  • Misogyny: the Extremist Gateway?
    UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME OSLO GOVERNANCE CENTRE MISOGYNY: THE EXTREMIST GATEWAY? JUNE 2021 Extremism InFocus, Issue Brief 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DEFINING Misogyny is often central to violent extremist indoctrination, recruitment and ideology and yet it mostly escapes scrutiny by policymakers. Closer attention to the MYSOGYNY AND relationship between misogyny and violent extremism will improve understanding of how the two relate at the level of individual radicalization, the dynamics within VIOLENT violent extremist groups and in shaping their political agendas. While the problem of misogyny is not new – as it is rooted in longstanding structural inequalities and EXTREMISM discrimination against women – its relationship with violent extremism is rapidly Misogyny is often defined as the evolving, due in part to the rise of social media and Internet-enabled globalization hatred of women, conceived as of hate. a belief held by individual men and some women. Philosopher Misogyny is linked to violent extremism in several ways. Some men have Kate Manne however defines it deliberately targeted women in attacks they justify as driven by their hatred of more broadly as: “a political women, incidents that sometimes are called terrorist attacks. Certain violent phenomenon whose purpose is extremist groups have also made practices such as rape, forced marriage and to police and enforce women’s enslavement a part of their repertoires of violence and forms of social control. subordination and to uphold Online attacks, such as doxing, disproportionately target women at a time when male dominance."[2] Men many violent extremist groups are embracing ideologies that perceive the gains demand a variety of services women have made in recent decades in terms of participation in public life, from women: love, admiration, leadership and the economy as a threat.
    [Show full text]
  • Violence Against Women
    Violence Against Women http://vaw.sagepub.com Gender Equality and Women’s Absolute Status: A Test of the Feminist Models of Rape Kimberly Martin, Lynne M. Vieraitis and Sarah Britto VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN 2006; 12; 321 DOI: 10.1177/1077801206286311 The online version of this article can be found at: http://vaw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/12/4/321 Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com Additional services and information for Violence Against Women can be found at: Email Alerts: http://vaw.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://vaw.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Citations (this article cites 6 articles hosted on the SAGE Journals Online and HighWire Press platforms): http://vaw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/12/4/321#BIBL Downloaded from http://vaw.sagepub.com by Susan Miner on February 26, 2007 © 2006 SAGE Publications. All rights reserved. Not for commercial use or unauthorized distribution. Violence Against Women Volume 12 Number 4 10.1177/1077801206286311ViolenceMartin et Againstal. / Gender W omen Equality and W omen’s Status April 2006 321-339 © 2006 Sage Publications 10.1177/1077801206286311 Gender Equality and http://vaw.sagepub.com hosted at Women’s Absolute Status http://online.sagepub.com A Test of the Feminist Models of Rape Kimberly Martin University of Missouri, St. Louis Lynne M. Vieraitis University of Alabama at Birmingham Sarah Britto Central Washington University Feminist theory predicts both a positive and negative relationship between gender equal- ity and rape rates. Although liberal and radical feminist theory predicts that gender equal- ity should ameliorate rape victimization, radical feminist theorists have argued that gen- der equality may increase rape in the form of male backlash.
    [Show full text]
  • Engender Resource Kit
    ENGENDER RESOURCE KIT Welcome to the Engender project, a collaboration between Heinrich Boell Foundation and Accidental Films and TV INTRODUCTION TO ENGENDER Welcome to the Engender project, a collaboration between the Heinrich Böll Foundation and Accidental Films and TV to pilot a television series on feminism, gender issues and key related concepts. The first three episodes explore the concept of feminism; feminism and intersectionality; and gendered representations in the media. In each episode, a set of core issues is discussed in depth in order to introduce viewers to a feminist understanding of the specific topic. This resource pack mirror the TV series. Developed from research undertaken for each episode, they contain a summary of the content, key feminist quotes, links to more information, and some provocative questions to help deepen understanding and promote further discussion. THE PILOT SERIES EPISODE 1. “Femi” What? Explores the origins of feminism; unpacks what feminism is and what it is not; and looks at how feminist action has changed society globally and locally in South Africa. EPISODE 2. Many Identities = Many Oppressions. Grapples with the complexity of intersectional feminism to show how gender identity, race, class, sex, age and ability intersect to multiply the effects of prejudice on an individual. EPISODE 3. Ways of Seeing. Examines the way the media represents people through a gendered lens that normalises stereotypes based on perceived genders and sexualities. III “FEMI” WHAT? TABLE OF CONTENTS “FEMI” WHAT? 1 INTRODUCTION 1 CORE MESSAGES 1 WHAT IS FEMINISM 2 Sexuality and Gender Identities 7 HISTORY OF FEMINISM 9 Waves of Western Feminism 10 Western Feminism and Race 11 Backlash 15 HISTRY OF FEMINISM IN AFRICA 17 The African Feminist Forum 21 Voice, Power and Soul: Portraits of African Feminists 22 FEMINISM IN SOUTH AFRICA 24 QUESTIONS 31 GUEST PANELISTS 32 “FEMI” WHAT? 1 INTRODUCTION This introduces the readers to feminism, its genesis and linkages to concepts like gender, sexuality, race and culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecting Gender-Based Violence, Sexual Harassment and Everyday Sexism
    Feminist Pocketbook TIP SHEET #3: Connecting gender-based violence, sexual harassment and everyday sexism The Coalition of Feminists for Social Change (COFEM), created in 2017 to reassert a feminist perspective in violence against women and girls (VAWG) work, is a collective of activists, academics, and practi- tioners working globally to end VAWG. This Tip Sheet is part of the COFEM Feminist Pocketbook. For access to the full Pocketbook, go to: www.cofemsocialchange.org. Tip Sheet 3 explores how gender-based violence, sexual harassment and everyday sexism are related, and discusses potential actions for a holistic approach to building gender equality. Key points • Everyday sexism, sexual harassment and other forms of gender-based violence (GBV) all share a root cause — gender inequality and the oppression of women and girls. • Feminist movements and women’s collective voices show that women across the world experience multiple forms of violence throughout their lives. • Distinguishing different forms of GBV as ‘more serious’ than others ignores how patriarchy and gender inequality create a culture in which violence against women and girls is accepted and normalised. What is the issue? have been shared through collective actions such For several decades, GBV1 has been recognised as the #MeToo movement, facilitated by social me- as a serious global health epidemic and a breach dia and an increasing global connectedness. This of women’s basic human rights. Over the last 20 powerful movement, which has empowered many years, a growing body of data on the scope of the women to speak out for the first time, has provid- problem — and evidence demonstrating how GBV ed even further evidence of the scope of GBV and is driven by gender inequality — have given great- resulted in increased calls for accountability.
    [Show full text]
  • MIAMI UNIVERSITY the Graduate School
    MIAMI UNIVERSITY The Graduate School Certificate for Approving the Dissertation We hereby approve the Dissertation of Bridget Christine Gelms Candidate for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy ______________________________________ Dr. Jason Palmeri, Director ______________________________________ Dr. Tim Lockridge, Reader ______________________________________ Dr. Michele Simmons, Reader ______________________________________ Dr. Lisa Weems, Graduate School Representative ABSTRACT VOLATILE VISIBILITY: THE EFFECTS OF ONLINE HARASSMENT ON FEMINIST CIRCULATION AND PUBLIC DISCOURSE by Bridget C. Gelms As our digital environments—in their inhabitants, communities, and cultures—have evolved, harassment, unfortunately, has become the status quo on the internet (Duggan, 2014 & 2017; Jane, 2014b). Harassment is an issue that disproportionately affects women, particularly women of color (Citron, 2014; Mantilla, 2015), LGBTQIA+ women (Herring et al., 2002; Warzel, 2016), and women who engage in social justice, civil rights, and feminist discourses (Cole, 2015; Davies, 2015; Jane, 2014a). Whitney Phillips (2015) notes that it’s politically significant to pay attention to issues of online harassment because this kind of invective calls “attention to dominant cultural mores” (p. 7). Keeping our finger on the pulse of such attitudes is imperative to understand who is excluded from digital publics and how these exclusions perpetuate racism and sexism to “preserve the internet as a space free of politics and thus free of challenge to white masculine heterosexual hegemony” (Higgin, 2013, n.p.). While rhetoric and writing as a field has a long history of examining myriad exclusionary practices that occur in public discourses, we still have much work to do in understanding how online harassment, particularly that which is gendered, manifests in digital publics and to what rhetorical effect.
    [Show full text]