48-51 Char Tech Paper_046854 IndustryNews.QXD 4/20/18 7:11 AM Page 48

TECHNICAL ARTICLE Newly Developed Resins More Challenging to Control in Production Plants Developments in resins have opened up a whole new world of design choices, but challenges remain because current quality control parameters only show part of the picture

By B. Monrabal, A. Ortín, and P. del Hierro Polymer Char, Valencia,

he introduction of single-site catalysts and the use of multiple reactors in the polyolefins industry has opened new routes to design resins with the desirable microstructure to optimize performance in specific applications. While this is good news for manufactur- Ting, it presents a greater challenge for quality control because the currently used parameters show only partial information of the resin microstructure. Melt Index (MI) and density are common parameters in simplified design for quality control purposes (GPC-QC). process control and product definition that represent aver- A similar situation is that of PE copolymers, such as the three age molar mass and average composition respectively. LLDPE resins shown in Figure 2. They all have the same However, with today’s sophisticated industrial resins, these comonomer content, expressed with the density parameter, parameters are very far from defining resin performance. A set of analytical techniques has been recently developed to detail additional parameters relevant to the resin perform- ance. Same Resins, Different Performance? Within the (PE) family, the added information is essential, especially in the case in dual reactor resins––as with pipe and blow molding products––or in the broad spec- trum of linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE) resins. Figure 1 shows three different PE resins that, in spite of hav- ing the same Melt Index, have completely different (MMD), and thus completely different per- formance and processing behavior. This reveals that a separation technique such as Gel Permeation-Size Exclusion (GPC/SEC) is needed to have an unequiv- ocal characterization of the resin chemical structure. These Figure 1. Three different resins with the same Melt techniques, which in the past demanded operation expert- Index but completely different MWD and thus different ise and sophisticated equipment, are available today with a performance.

48 | PLASTICS ENGINEERING | MAY 2018 | www.4spe.org | www.plasticsengineering.org 48-51 Polymer Char Tech Paper_046854 IndustryNews.QXD 4/20/18 7:13 AM Page 49

reactor-catalyst processes demand a closer control of the microstructure to prevent product variation with significant losses in off-grade production. The analysis of average prop- erties such as MI, density, and amorphous fractions by rheological or spectroscopic techniques is important in sta- ble process conditions, but on many occasions, it is not enough. The measurement of the distributions or addition- al parameters by separation techniques such as GPC-QC or CRYSTEX QC is required. This is especially important during grade changes, where reaching the desired microstructure in the shortest possible time is crucial to reduce off-grade pro- duction. Simplified separation techniques capable of obtaining results in short time are essential. The industry has also shown an increased interest and production of very high and ultra-high molar mass (UHMW) Figure 2. Three different PE resins with the same density resins in the last years. However, a full characterization of but completely different CCD and different performance. these resins is a challenging task and demands method and materials adaptation to prevent precipitation of the resin in the analytical process. The GPC-QC at low flow rate, has been but reveal completely different Chemical Composition Dis- developed to analyze the MMD of very high molar mass tribution (CCD) and thus different performance and processing resins, one at a time. Additionally, a dedicated Intrinsic Vis- behavior. Once more, this shows that a separation technique cosity Analyzer (IVA) was also designed to automatically is demanded to have unequivocal characterization; in this case, using Temperature Rising Elution Fractionation (TREF), Crystallization Analysis Fractionation (CRYSTAF), or Crystal- lization Elution Fractionation (CEF). Improving Performance by Fully Revealing the Resin Microstructure Although MMD and CCD represent the most significant microstructural information, on occasions, this data alone is not enough due to the interdependence of molar mass and composition. A good example is that of pipe resins, which contain small amounts of comonomer, but for good performance, the comonomer (branching) is required to be incorporated within the larger molecules. The analysis of branching at different molar masses can be today obtained in a quality control lab by a simplified but sensitive GPC sys- GPC-QC Instrument tem with an additional IR composition sensor (GPC-QC IR5). Within the (PP) family, the most demand- ing structure is that of heterophasic or high-impact polypropylene (HIPP). The routine analysis of the amorphous content (“xylene solubles”) is important, but the analysis of the ethylene content and intrinsic viscosity in the two phas- es (crystalline and amorphous) provides additional information that can be critical to optimize the product’s performance. All these parameters can now be obtained automatically with the new CRYSTEX instrumentation based on a TREF separa- tion process (CRYSTEX® QC and CRYSTEX 42). No Longer a Nice-to-Have, Now a Must-Have in Production The increasing throughput of the new polyolefin manufac- turing plants and the incorporation of complex multiple Intrinsic Viscosity Analyzer, IVA

www.plasticsengineering.org | www.4spe.org | MAY 2018 | PLASTICS ENGINEERING | 49 48-51 Polymer Char Tech Paper_046854 IndustryNews.QXD 4/20/18 7:11 AM Page 50

TECHNICAL ARTICLE

analyze multiple samples of UHMW resins through a capil- gration of a capillary viscometer provides an automated lary relative viscometer without memory effects or plugging. measurement of intrinsic viscosity of the whole sample and both amorphous and crystalline fractions. Unparalleled Separation of the Soluble Table 1 shows data obtained from seven replicate analy- Fraction in PP ses using a four-gram sample for a set of three polypropylene CRYSTEX QC is a fully automated instrument that separates products with average standard deviations shown for each crystalline and amorphous fractions by means of a propri- type of measurement. No additional experimental effort is etary Temperature Rising Elution Fractionation (TREF) column required, since all the data is collected by the IR and vis- where a small aliquot of the homogeneous polymer solu- cometer detectors during the automated analysis with one tion is crystallized, in di- or tri-chlorobenzene (o-DCB/TCB), piece of equipment in a single two-hour experiment. on a support under reproducible and well-controlled condi- CRYSTEX 42 is a version of CRYSTEX QC with a 42-vial tions. The polymer solution is loaded into the column at an high-temperature autosampler available when requiring con- elevated temperature; it is crystallized to near-ambient tem- trol of multiple samples, which are considered of reasonable perature with no flow and then the solvent is moved through homogeneity. the column to elute the amorphous soluble material towards GPC for Quality Control and Process the online detectors. Finally, the column temperature is increased again to re-dissolve the crystalline material which Control in PE and PP Manufacturing is eventually eluted to the detectors. The GPC-QC instrument is built with the same single-sample The analytical workflow is also very simple: all the analyst dissolution station described above, and simplified hard- is required to do is put an approximate amount of sample ware design including only one valve at high temperature, in a disposable bottle, place it in the stirred-heated plate, an external HPLC pump, and robust detectors, which help in and lower a handle to pierce the bottle’s septum with a nee- achieving the required level of reliability and minimizing dle (Figure 3). The automated process proceeds under potential downtime. The main detector is infrared, which computer control, including filling of the bottle with pre- provides a concentration signal based on absorbance of total heated solvent; controlling the dissolution time, temperature, CH, being appropriate for a QC environment thanks to the and stirring; and taking an aliquot of the solution from the fast stabilization time, stable baseline, and good sensitivity. bottle into the instrument column. In addition, IR detection provides complementary informa- The amorphous/crystalline fractions are quantified with tion on chemical composition (short-chain branching, a sensitive filter-type Infrared (IR) detector that delivers equiv- comonomer content) along the MMD. alent values to the xylene solubles test, obtained with The analytical workflow requires minimum manual effort. outstanding precision. In addition, the IR detector measures When a sample of polymer is received in the , it is the ethylene incorporation in the case of copolymers. The inte- weighed into a disposable bottle which is placed into the dissolution station oven. Then the analyst lowers a handle to insert the needle through the septum. The analysis is start- ed from the computer and proceeds automatically accord- ing to the pre-set method conditions. Once the analysis is finished, the chromatograms are processed to generate the MMD and any calculated parameters of interest. When a new sample comes in, a new Figure 3. Safe and efficient operation of the single-sample dissolution station in GPC- bottle is prepared with it and QC and CRYSTEX® QC instruments: 1) Remove the previous bottle and place a new one the analyst just discards the with an approximate sample weight; 2) manual injection and press START. previous one placing the new

50 | PLASTICS ENGINEERING | MAY 2018 | www.4spe.org | www.plasticsengineering.org 48-51 Polymer Char Tech Paper_046854 IndustryNews.QXD 4/20/18 7:11 AM Page 51

Table 1. Analysis of amorphous/crystalline fractions of three polypropylene products by CRYSTEX® QC

one in the station. Following this workflow, the GPC-QC can (MI and density). be operated continuously with a cycle time of one hour or The optimized dissolution and separation processes open less, which is found appropriate for controlling the start-up the door to high-temperature GPC analysis within 30 minutes of reactors, or when a change of grade is conducted. Once in most cases, including the sample preparation step with an the process is stable, production may need to be controlled efficient dissolution process under a nitrogen atmosphere, at a slower pace, one or several times per day. and less than one hour even for the most difficult product. An application example is provided in Figure 4 for a bimodal This is a step forward in this kind of technology and enables high-density polyethylene made in a dual-reactor process. its practical application in manufacturing plants as a process A lower molar mass high-density component is typically pro- control/quality control tool. duced, together with the second component of larger molar Measuring Intrinsic Viscosity of All mass with a small amount of added comonomer. That bal- ance results in enhanced mechanical properties, such as Polymeric Materials environmental stress cracking resistance for pipe applica- The Intrinsic Viscosity Analyzer (IVA) is a dedicated instru- tions. From a single GPC-QC analysis, and in less than one ment for determining intrinsic viscosity of polymeric materials, hour with minimal operator intervention, it is possible to based on the same QC platform. The relative viscosity of a obtain an estimation on the density being produced in each dilute polymer solution with reference to the pure solvent of the two reactors (based on measured SCB level), as well is measured by means of a robust serial capillary viscome- as the molar mass and the weight fraction of each compo- ter. From it, the intrinsic viscosity of the polymer can be nent. The level of control of the process is thus, greatly calculated using a single-point estimation method. Due to the enhanced over alternative methods based on bulk properties popularity of dilute solution viscosity measurements and the availability of such methods in many , the IV of has been traditionally used to specify and to con- trol the production grades. Different polymers in various solvents have been analyzed in this system, including poly- acrylonitrile (PAN) in N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), polyethylene terephthalate (PET) in phenol/o-DCB, polylac- tic acid (PLA) in TCB as well as polypropylene and polyethylene (even high- and ultra-high molar mass) in TCB and o-DCB. The intrinsic viscosity results obtained by the IVA are in good agreement with reference methods (ISO 1628-3:2010 f.i.) in all cases. References 1. Automated Soluble fraction analysis in PP (CRYSTEX® QC—The Column (LC/GC), November 2013 2. Soluble fraction analysis in polypropylene for QC (CRYSTEX® QC) LCGC—LCGC EU and NA The Applications Notebook, Decem- ber 2013 Figure 4. MMD and short-chain branching (SCB) frequen- 3. Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC) for Process Control and cy measured by GPC-QC for a bimodal HDPE. The densi- Quality Control—The Column (LC/GC), September 2015 ty of each of the modes was calculated from an average 4. Solution Viscosity of Polymeric Materials by IVA—Petro Indus- of the SCB frequency in each molar mass range. try News, April/May Issue 2015

www.plasticsengineering.org | www.4spe.org | MAY 2018 | PLASTICS ENGINEERING | 51