DOCSLIB.ORG

Arnaldo Momigliano: the Historian of History

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arnaldo Momigliano: the Historian of History Arnaldo Momigliano: The Historian of History Anthony Grafton On February 19, 1952, Arnaldo Momigliano gave his inaugural lecture as professor of ancient history at University College London. “It was about twenty-five years ago,” he told his listeners, “that the name of Gower Street first impressed itself on my mind.” He had been reading Harriet Lewin Grote’s biography of her husband, George Grote, the banker, liberal politician, and historian of Greece who was one of the college’s founders. She described George returning home, tired out, by “a shilling fare of hackney coach” from meetings of the College Council at Gower Street. “Thus,” Momigliano explained, “in my admittedly rather imperfect map of a mythical London, the Gower Street of George Grote had its place beside the Baker Street of Sherlock Holmes and the George Street of Giuseppe Mazzini, near the Euston Road. The transition from myth to reality is always complicated. Yet for once the reality was not inferior to the myth.” Readers of the essays collected in this volume will soon see that this passage is typical of Momigliano’s writing, in its elegance of style, in its breadth of reference, and in its easy, confident transition from an opening anecdote to, in this case, a compliment to his new colleagues. They will come to know Momigliano as a scholar who could discuss the origins of Jewish and Greek historical writing in the first millennium BCE and the interpretive social sciences of the late twentieth century with equal insight and authority. They will depart with a new appreciation for the scholarly adventures and discoveries of Greeks and Romans, Dutch Calvinists and French Benedictines, Italian jurists and German professors—as well as a new understanding of the scholarly misadventures of those who have tried, across the centuries, to winch the original sources into their tough, corset-like theories. In the end, they will see—as Momigliano’s readers have seen for generations—that he offered a model, the first one ever created, for studying the traditions of historical research ix ANTHONY GRAFTON and writing with the sophistication that scholars have long attained when studying the traditions of science. The ease with which the medicine goes down—with which Momigliano takes the reader into the labyrinths of forgotten debates about the Hebrew tense system and Roman ballads about the past and shows why they matter—was not won quickly, but over the course of his life, and with immense difficulty and effort. True, Momigliano was a prodigy, in the special Italian sense. (“In comparison with the majority of Italian intellectuals,” he wrote, “Croce grew up slowly. He published his first general considerations onLa storia ridotta sotto il concetto generale dell’arte when he was twenty-seven.”). Momigliano, by contrast, mastered Greek, Latin, and Hebrew at home in the Piedmontese town of Caraglio, where he was born in 1908, and scored a dazzling success, except in mathematics, on the matriculation exams. He became one of the star students of the University of Turin at a time when the northern city nurtured many brilliant intellectuals, including Norberto Bobbio, Cesare Pavese, Carlo Dionisotti, Leone and Natalia Ginzburg, and, a few years later, Primo Levi. Momigliano established himself as a scholar with breathtaking speed. He read omnivorously in many languages, everything from Greek and Roman, Sumerian and Jewish texts to the philosophy of Kant. And he seemed to forget nothing. When he recalled reading the life of George Grote twenty-five years before he became professor in London—in 1926, when he was eighteen—he was no doubt telling the exact truth, as well as exhibiting his proverbial powers of recollection. Soon he began to write: three books, each on a different aspect of ancient history, and more than a hundred articles appeared while he was still in his early twenties. Momigliano followed his teacher of ancient history, Gaetano de Sanctis, to Rome. He wrote many articles for the Enciclopedia Italiana, a Fascist enterprise— but one for which Federico Chabod, an anti-Fascist and a skillful judge of academic talent, coordinated the historical entries. In 1936 he became professor of ancient history at Turin. By now his work was internationally known. His book on Claudius, exceptionally, was translated into English in 1934, only two years after its first appearance. Momigliano’s interests in this period ranged widely, from the history of the Roman Empire and that of the Jews in the Hellenistic period to the development of ancient political theory. But the x FOREWORD development of historical thought and method already played a central part in his thinking and research. Ancient historiography, from Thucydides to Josephus, had fascinated him from the beginning of his studies, and he had read widely in the polyglot secondary literature of classical scholarship. As a young professor, he began to make the development of scholarship an object of study in its own right and to set it against its larger historical context. This was, he argued, the best way to restore movement in fields that had bogged down. To work effectively on the Hellenistic world, he had to return to the work of those who had created the concept of Hellenism, above all the nineteenth-century historian Johann Gustav Droysen. And to rethink the history of the later Roman Empire, he had to retrace the long process by which the history of the state and that of the Christian church had become separate scholarly enterprises. His articles on these topics became classics, which both opened up the history of historical scholarship and used it to offer new ways forward to his colleagues. The proud Italian Jewish family to which Momigliano belonged looked with gratitude to the national state, which had broken the old ghettos and offered Jews—including many of his relatives—full rights to serve it. Momigliano took the Fascist oath, as employees of the state were required to do. Both his teacher de Sanctis and his friend Leone Ginzburg refused to do so. But his position became more and more difficult, and in 1938 the racial laws deprived him of his professorship. He left Italy in 1939 and found refuge in England, where the Society for the Protection of Science and Learning soon provided a small fellowship. Briefly interned as an enemy alien, but soon freed, Momigliano spent the war years in Oxford. Unlike many of the German émigré scholars, he had not mastered English as a child. In fact, he had never left his native country. He learned with great difficulty to speak English—he never lost his heavy accent. More remarkably, he learned to write it with Tacitean elegance and concision. New friends—notably Isobel Henderson and Beryl Smalley—helped him. So did Fritz Saxl and other members of the circle of the Warburg Institute, which had escaped the Nazis in the early 1930s, moving from Hamburg to London. He began to publish massive articles in British journals and played a major part in creating the first edition of the Oxford Classical Dictionary. England’s liberal culture and strong support for classical xi ANTHONY GRAFTON scholarship mattered deeply to Momigliano. He decided not to return to Italy after the war, even when Croce offered him the directorship of his institute in Naples. After a few years at Bristol he moved to the chair of ancient history at University College London. It was here that Momigliano became a legendary figure, the fearsome leader of wide-ranging seminars, who seemed to sleep through much of each visitor’s paper and then woke to pose the most penetrating question, and the habitué of libraries, especially the British Library, the Warburg Institute, and the Bodleian, where he digested enormous piles of books on the little slips of paper, each with its carbon copy, on which he took notes. Expulsion from Italy, and the loss of his parents, who died in a Nazi extermination camp, transformed Momigliano’s approach to the historical tradition. He continued to study the ancient historians, though he had lost the confidence with which he had, as a young scholar, traced the development of their work conjecturally, stage by stage. In one case he explicitly confessed, and in many more he found, that songs of experience had replaced songs of innocence, as he abandoned the theories of his own youth without adopting those of more recent writers. But he continued to approach the texts, both those preserved in full and those represented only by fragments, with open eyes and an open mind. The extraordinary article reprinted here on “Eastern Elements in Post-Exilic Jewish, and Greek, Historiography” is exemplary. In it he conjured up from scraps in the Bible and the brilliantly suggestive work of a respected colleague, Elias Bickerman, lost forms of Persian and Near Eastern historical writing. Even more remarkable—and even more innovative—was the work that Momigliano now devoted to modern historiography. A passionate student of German thought in the 1930s, he had generally accepted the traditional view that critical scholarship began in the German universities in the late eighteenth century. When Momigliano chose to introduce himself to his new colleagues at University College London by discussing George Grote, he was making a serious point—however light-heartedly he introduced it. Grote had written a liberal history of ancient Greece. Evading the spell of Socrates and Plato, he had identified the Sophists, whom they despised, as the first teachers of the liberal arts of public speech and citizenship. In Momigliano’s words: “He loved Athens without any romantic nostalgia as a state which was formed for the good life. xii FOREWORD He saw a parallel between the education imparted by the Sophists and Socrates and that imparted in a modern university.” And by writing this liberal history—something he could have accomplished nowhere but in liberal England—Grote, rather than the Germans, transformed the study of politics and thought in ancient Greece.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Introduction
    INTRODUCTION From the beginning Arnaldo Momigliano believed that biography was an important means of understanding the past. For him the lives and aspira- tions of historical figures provided a point of entry into their world, their ideas, and their traditions. Two of Momigliano's earliest books were biographical studies. His influential revisionist study of the Emperor Claudius was first published in 1932 (at the same time as his article on Caligula's personality), and the extended essay on Philip of Macedon ap- peared just two years later.1 Throughout the 1930s Momigliano contributed a vast number of articles to the Enciclopedia Italiana, of which the majority were biographical entries. Most of these were on ancient personalities such as Caligula, Corbulo, Demetrius of Phaleron, Phlegon, Nero, Otho, Poppaea, and many others (there are well over two hundred entries).2 But some, such as the entry on Eduard Meyer, adumbrated Momigliano's later work on modern masters of historical scholarship. This is the work brought together here, including nine pieces published originally in Italian and appearing now in English for the first time. After the war, when Momigliano resumed his contribu- tions to the Enciclopedia Italiana, the new direction of his biographical interests is shown by the preponderance of essays on contemporary schol- ars, such as Frank Adcock, Norman Baynes, Maurice Bowra, Eduard Fraenkel, and others. The first part of the introduction is the work of G. W. Bowersock, and the second of T.J. Cornell. We are both profoundly indebted to Anne Marie Meyer for her constant support, advice, and correction of error.
    [Show full text]
  • 10. Momigliano on Peace and Liberty
    2010 ACTA UNIVERSITATIS CAROLINAE – PHILOLOGICA 1 Pag.: 81–96 GRAECOLATINA pragensia xxiiI OSWYn MURRAY (Oxford) MOMIGLIANO ON PEACE AND LIBERTY (1940) Recently in Britain we celebrated the centenary of the birth of my revered teacher, Arnaldo Momigliano (1908–1987), one of the greatest histo- rians of Europe and of the ancient world in the twentieth century.1 I want to talk to you today in Prague about his experiences and ideas, not just out of piety, but because his life and his suffering belong to a history that you too, and all the peoples of cen- tral Europe especially, have shared. In terms of the persecution of intellectuals the twentieth century was ‘Europe’s dark century’,2 probably the worst period of modern European history since the wars of religion of the seventeenth century: not since then have so many great thinkers suffered for their beliefs at the hands of corrupt and bigoted rulers. As we stand at the start of a new century, it is very hard to believe what our generation has experienced, and even harder to believe in the inevitability of progress. It is important for us all, young and old, to remember the dark past out of which we have so recently emerged after three generations of suffering, and to work for a future Europe based on tolerance and unity. On 2nd September 1938, in pursuit of his aims of a closer alliance with Hitler, Mussolini issued his notorious racial decree dismissing from public office all those of Jewish origin. There had been little earlier sign of any danger to Italian Jews, who were indeed as completely assimilated as the Jews of England.
    [Show full text]
  • Wissenschaft Des Judentums and the Study of Religion in Italy (1890S–1930S)
    CHAPTER 6 Living in Exile: Wissenschaft des Judentums and the Study of Religion in Italy (1890s–1930s) Cristiana Facchini Recent scholarship on the Wisseschaft des Judentums has turned its atten- tion to national contexts outside of the German one, where the scientific inquiry of Judaism was deeply rooted.1 The Italian case, on which this chapter focuses, is particularly interesting, as it stands both at the center and at the periphery of this intellectual endeavor, and it therefore presents 1 For a general outline see Paul Mendes-Flohr and Jehuda Reinharz, The Jew in the Modern World: A Documentary History, 3rd edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010); Ismar Schorch, From Text to Context: The Turn to History in Modern Judaism (Hanover, NH: Brandeis University Press, 1994). For a general overview: Kerstin von der Krone and Mirjam Thulin, “Wissenschaft in Context: A Research Essay on Wissenschaft des Judentums,” Leo Baeck Institute Yearbook vol. 58 (2013): 249–280. For an interesting study on the United States see Aaron Hughes, The Study of Judaism: Authenticity, Identity, Scholarship (Albany: SUNY Press, 2013). C. Facchini (*) University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy e-mail: [email protected] © The Author(s) 2018 101 F. Bregoli et al. (eds.), Italian Jewish Networks from the Seventeenth to the Twentieth Century, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89405-8_6 [email protected] 102 C. FACCHINI a set of questions that are linked to religion at large, in relation to a society undergoing major cultural and political shifts.
    [Show full text]
  • Qt5c54s2v7.Pdf
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Previously Published Works Title Late antiquity and the antiquarian Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5c54s2v7 Journal Studies in Late Antiquity, 1(4) ISSN 2470-6469 Author Macrae, DE Publication Date 2017-12-01 DOI 10.1525/sla.2017.1.4.335 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Duncan E. MacRae, Studies in Late Antiquity 1 (2017): 335-358 (Author’s Final Version, see SLA for pagination) Late Antiquity and the Antiquarian The prominence of the past in Late Antiquity has become popular among students of the period as a distinguishing characteristic of late antique culture: Averil Cameron has suggested that “remaking the past” was a major cultural and intellectual preoccupation across society; Marco Formisano has proposed that the “processing not just of the past but of relation to the past” is a key to late antique literary aesthetics; and David Scourfield has advanced the idea that the special character of late antique culture was the multiplicity of ways that the past was integrated into the present.1 In substantiating these arguments about the distinctive culture of the past in Late Antiquity, the dominant contemporary approaches are the renewed study of literary historiography and discussion of the role of religious identities in shaping interest in the past. To take the first of these, late antique historiography has become a hot topic in both anglophone and continental scholarship, with much fresh work both on established questions of sources
    [Show full text]
  • Dumézil, Momigliano, Bloch, Between Politics and Historiography
    HISTOIRE DES ÉTUDES INDO-EUROPÉENNES Studia Indo-Europæa 2 (2002–2005), 187-205 DUMÉZIL, MOMIGLIANO, BLOCH, BETWEEN POLITICS AND HISTORIOGRAPHY Marco V. GARCÍA QUINTELA University of Santiago de Compostela Shortly before his death in the spring of 2000, E. Polomé, one of the leading American authorities on Indo-European languages and cultures, lamented the weakness of reactions in defence of the work of the French scholar G. Dumézil (1898-1986), against those who attack it basing their arguments on its foundations in political movements which were close to Nazism or Fascism in the 1930’s (1996, 1998, 1999). This is a very serious matter, as it casts a shadow of doubt over the important volume of work produced between 1924 and 1986 dedicated to the study of the mythology and religions of the historical peoples whose origins lie with the ancient Indo-Europeans (see the very useful bibliography drawn up by Couteau-Begarie). Of particular importance among these studies was a volume of texts from different branches of the Indo-European family, which gradually extended over a wide area. It is particularly significant that Dumézil was a great specialist in the field of Caucasian languages (whether Indo-European or not), an area in which he undertook studies of both linguistics and folklore. Albeit the case, the political criticisms directed at him would lead us to think that this work leaves us with a bitter aftertaste: that in reading it, and being influenced by it, leads to the reader being an unwitting accessory to one of the most repulsive ideologies produced in twentieth century Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Read Dame Averil's Essay Here
    An Accidental Scholar Averil Cameron The Catholic Historical Review, Volume 107, Number 1, Winter 2021, pp. 1-27 (Article) Published by The Catholic University of America Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/cat.2021.0000 For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/784159 [ Access provided at 12 Mar 2021 15:45 GMT from Bodleian Libraries of the University of Oxford ] Averil Cameron Malcolm Morgan Photographers, Hatch End, Middlesex. THE CATHOLIC HISTORICAL REVIEW VOL. 107 WINTER 2021 NO. 1 An Accidental Scholar AVERIL CAMERON* In this essay I reflect on my development as a scholar of late antiquity and Byzantium over many decades. I was a Classics undergraduate at Oxford in the late 1950s, and my subsequent history took me first to Glasgow, then to London as a professor and back to Oxford as the head of a college and a pro-vice-chancellor, with several stays in the United States along the way. I have been lucky enough to be able to follow my intellectual curiosity in numerous directions, but always as a historian, and especially as a historian curious about the history of religion. Keywords: Oxford; late antiquity; Byzantium; orthodoxy; discourse ur small terraced house in Leek, North Staffordshire, did not go in for Obooks. We had a red one-volume encyclopaedia with a few color illus- trations (I remember Raphael’s Sistine Madonna), but the only history book I remember was A Child’s History of England by Charles Dickens, a deeply Protestant narrative peopled by Good Queen Bess and Bloody Mary. I was sent by my parents to Sunday School at the local Church of England parish church, St Edward’s, and later I used to play the piano there for hymns, and sometimes the organ at church.
    [Show full text]
  • The Longest Transference: Self-Consolation and Politics in Latin Philosophical Literature by Clifford Robinson Department of Cl
    The Longest Transference: Self-Consolation and Politics in Latin Philosophical Literature by Clifford Robinson Department of Classical Studies Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Peter Burian, Supervisor ___________________________ Jed W. Atkins ___________________________ Michael Hardt ___________________________ Micaela W. Janan ___________________________ William A. Johnson Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Classical Studies in the Graduate School of Duke University i 2014 v ABSTRACT The Longest Transference: Self-Consolation and Politics in Latin Philosophical Literature by Clifford Robinson Department of Classical Studies Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Peter Burian, Supervisor ___________________________ Jed W. Atkins ___________________________ Michael Hardt ___________________________ Micaela W. Janan ___________________________ William A. Johnson An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Classical Studies in the Graduate School of Duke University i 2014 v Copyright by Clifford Robinson 2014 Abstract This dissertation identifies Cicero’s Consolatio, Seneca’s Ad Polybium de consolatione, and Boethius’ De consolatione Philosophiae as self-consolations, in which these Roman authors employ philosophical argument and literary art, in order to provide
    [Show full text]
  • The World of Renowned Historian Arnaldo Momigliano Published on Iitaly.Org (
    The World of Renowned Historian Arnaldo Momigliano Published on iItaly.org (http://www.iitaly.org) The World of Renowned Historian Arnaldo Momigliano Joelle Grosso (December 06, 2016) A conversation between Anthony Grafton and Carlo Ginzburg about the Italian historian, Arnaldo Momigliano, will be held at CIMA this week. CIMA [2], the Center for Italian Modern Art along with the Centro Primo Levi New York [3] teamed up to organize an event dedicated to one of the most distinguished intellectuals of the 20th century in the fields of ancient and modern history, Arnaldo Momigliano [4]. CIMA was founded by Laura Mattiolo and Heather Ewing in 2013 and is a public nonprofit exhibition and research center that aims to promote the study of contemporary Italian art all over the globe. They are excited to put together this unique program that explores the work of one of Italy's most prominent historians. Momigliano was born in 1908 in the region of Piedmont and later in his life, went on to work as a Professor of Roman History at the University of Turin [5]. However, because of the Racial Laws [6] that were put into effect after the Fascist regime took control in 1938, he was forced to leave the country since he was Jewish. He moved to England and would remain there until his death in 1987. Page 1 of 2 The World of Renowned Historian Arnaldo Momigliano Published on iItaly.org (http://www.iitaly.org) During his long scholarly career, he taught at major academic institutions such as Oxford University [7], University College London [8], University of Chicago [9], and the Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa [10].
    [Show full text]
  • Late Antiquity in Contemporary Debate
    Late Antiquity in Contemporary Debate Late Antiquity in Contemporary Debate Edited by Rita Lizzi Testa Late Antiquity in Contemporary Debate Edited by Rita Lizzi Testa This book first published 2017 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2017 by Rita Lizzi Testa and contributors All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-4438-4308-3 ISBN (13): 978-1-4438-4308-9 International Committee of Historical Sciences – Comité International des Sciences Historiques TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ............................................................................................... vii Rita Lizzi Testa Historiography 1 Chapter One ................................................................................................. 2 Empire and Aftermath Clifford Ando Chapter Two .............................................................................................. 15 Crisis, Transition, Transformation: The End of the Roman World and the Usefulness of Useless Categories Pablo C. Diaz Methodology: Sources and Periodization Chapter Three ............................................................................................ 38
    [Show full text]