Destabilizing Racial Harmony: Hybridity, Nationality, and Spatiality in the Law and Cultural Production of Manchukuo
DESTABILIZING RACIAL HARMONY: HYBRIDITY, NATIONALITY, AND SPATIALITY IN THE LAW AND CULTURAL PRODUCTION OF MANCHUKUO by InYoung Bong This thesis/dissertation document has been electronically approved by the following individuals: Gunn,Edward Mansfield (Chairperson) Pan,An-Yi (Minor Member) Cochran,Sherman Gilbert (Minor Member) DESTABILIZING “RACIAL HARMONY”: HYBRIDITY, NATIONALITY, AND SPATIALITY IN THE LAW AND CULTURAL PRODUCTION OF MANCHUKUO A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by InYoung Bong August 2010 © 2010 InYoung Bong DESTABILIZING “RACIAL HARMONY”: HYBRIDITY, NATIONALITY, AND SPATIALITY IN THE LAW AND CULTURAL PRODUCTION OF MANCHUKUO InYoung Bong, Ph.D. Cornell University 2010 Based on archival research of law, history, literature, and film, my dissertation adopts an interdisciplinary and comparative approach to examine the representations and positioning of “foreigners” in both literary and visual texts, including films, produced in the 1930s and 1940s in Japanese-occupied Manchuria by writers from Mainland China, Taiwan, Korea, and Japan. My central concern in this study is to show how non-colonizers such as Russians, who were perceived as racially white but were not colonizers, and the offspring of interracial marriages between Chinese and Russians, (Taiwanese) Chinese, and Koreans in Manchukuo simultaneously mapped out and destabilized the boundaries of race and nationality within the processes of nation-building and (de)colonization. This study draws upon historiography, narratology, reader-response criticisms, and various literary and cultural theories to examine one of the central concerns: the use of language in narrative and (oral) history; the systems of signs are not only a primary and powerful means to forge racial, hybrid, and national identities; they are also the very location where boundary making and crossing are simultaneously constituted and deconstructed.
[Show full text]