CHAPTER XVIII Envmonmental FACTORS AFFECTING OYSTER POPULATIONS

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CHAPTER XVIII Envmonmental FACTORS AFFECTING OYSTER POPULATIONS CHAPTER XVIII ENVmONMENTAL FACTORS AFFECTING OYSTER POPULATIONS Page food. Those living singly and widely dispersed Positive factors of envlronment_____ 399 Character of bottom______________ 399 are of no commercial value. Water movements " .--- 400 Salinity - -_-_- -_-_-_ 404 Descriptions of oyster bottoms found in the Temperature__________________________ _____________________ __ ______ 407 world literature combined with personal observa­ Food -_-_---_-_---------_-------------_-- 408 tions over the course of years in the United States, Negative factors of envlronment_____ _ 409 Sedimentatlon___ __ _________ ___________ _____________________________ 410 France, Italy, the West Indies, Cuba, Venezuela, Dlsease___ ____ __ __ __ _____________ ___________________________________ 415 Panama, Hawaii, and some of the South Pacific Malpeque Bay dlsease____________________________________________ 415 Dermocystidium marinum________________________________________ 415 islands have convinced me that, regardless of the Disease associated with Haplosporidium__________________________ 417 species of oysters present, certain major factors Shell dlsease___________ 417 Foot disease _ _______________ __________ __________ _______________ 418 are common to all oyster bottoms. Hexamita_ _____________________ __________ _________________________ 419 It is a matter of historical interest that more Nematopsu_ ___ __________ ______ _____________________________ ______ 419 Trematodes and parasitic copepods_______________________________ 419 than 80 years ago Mobius (1883) established the Commensals and competltors_______________________________________ 420 concept of a biocenosis or a social community Boring sponges_ __ __ 420 Boring clam___ ___ ______ ____ __ ____________ ___________ ________ _____ 421 using an oyster bank as an example. According Mud worms__________________________ 421 to his definition every oyster bed is to a certain Oyster crab_____ ____ __ ____ ___ __ __ _________ __ _______ _________ __ __ __ 425 Splrochaetes____ __ _________________ __ ____ _________________ __ __ __ __ 426 degree- Perforating algae__________ __ 426 Fouling organlsms________ 426 . a community of living beings, a collection of species, Predators______ ______ _____________________________ _________ ______ 430 and a massing of individuals, which find here everything Carnivorous gastropods___________________________________________ 430 necessary for their growth and continuance, such as suitable Starfish____ __ ________ _________ _________________________ _____ ____ __ 437 soil, sufficient food, the requisite percentage of salt, and Flatworms___ __ ______ __ _______________________ ____ _____ ______ _____ 438 Crabs__ __ ____ __ ___________ ______ ____ ___________________ ______ __ 439 a temperature favorable to their development. Each Mud prawns and fish_____________________________________________ 439 species which lives here is represented by the greatest Blrds__ ___ __ _____ __________ ____ _______ __ ______ _________________ 439 number of individuals which can ~row to maturity subject Man_____ __ ____ __ _________ __ ____ __________________________________ 440 to the conditions which surround them, for among all Pollution __ ____ _________________ _____ __________________ __________ 441 Domestic sewage_ _ 442 species the number of individuals which arrive at maturity Industrial waste______________ __ 443 at each breeding period is much smaller than the number Radioactive waste________________________________________________ 445 of germs produced at that time. The total number of Combined etrect of environmental factors_____________________________ 445 mature individuals of all the species living together in Bibliography 446 any region is the sum of the survivors of all the germs which have been produced at all past breeding or brood The various species of the family Ostreidae periods; and this sum of matured germs represents a inhabit the coastal waters within the broad belt certain quantum of life which enters into a certain number of the sea, limited by the latitudes 64° N. and 44° of individuals, and which, as does all life, gains permanence by means of transmission. S. Some large aggregations cover many square miles of bottom of littoral and intertidal zones; Mobius further commented that a change in one they also thrive above the bottom attached to factor of a biocenosis affects other factors of the rocks and underwater structures, branches and environment and eventually changes the com­ trunks of fallen trees, and miscellaneous objects. munity character. Relative abundance of various These aggregations of live oysters and empty shells species constituting a bottom community is are called oyster bottoms, oyster beds, oyster affected by changes in estuarine environment banks, or oyster reefs. The expressions are not and by man's activities which alter the environ­ well defined either biologically or in the legal ment. Patterns of currents, salinity gradients, sense and are used interchangeably. Only those and turbidity of water may be changed by dredg­ species of oysters which form large and dense ing operations, construction of inshore installa­ populations are important to man as a source of tions, and other harbor and waterway improve- FISHERY BULLETIN: VOLUME 64, CHAPTER XVIII 397 :733--8510--64-26 ments. Commercial dredging removes substantial The inferences are in aCl?ord with observations portions of natural oyster grounds; planting of made by European ecologists and summarized seed oysters for growing increases artificially the by Hedgpeth (1953). In the Elbe estuary the population densities. Inadvertent introduction weight of all invertebrates per square meter of of foreign species, competitors, and predators bottom decreases from 6,068 g. in the area of full disturbs the established biological balance. Final­ oceanic salinity to only 37 g. in brackish water. ly, excessive discharge of domestic sewage and A similar decrease in the weight of community trade wastes causes irreparable damage to pro­ biomass is found along the northern coast of ductive oyster bottoms. Germany, although the difference is much smaller The productivity of a sea bottom may be ranging from 304 g. per square meter of sea measured by determining the sum of weights of bottom to 16 g. in the inshore areas. The decrease all animals and plants in a unit of area. The in the biomass cannot be attributed to a single value, called community biomass, is of consider­ factor of the environment since other conditions able theoretical interest to the marine ecologist such as rate of water movements, sedimentation, engaged in the study of oceanic productivity. It and food content are associated with the salinity has, however, no practical application in deter­ changes. minations of the productive capabilities of a There are many well-documented cases of community dominated by a single species such destruction of productive oyster bottoms by as oyster, clam, or scallop. The species produc­ human activities. Mobius (1883) cites formerly tivity of any bottom may be materially reduced rich oyster beds of Cancale, Rochefort, Marennes, by competitors, predators, and other conditions and Oleron on the West Coast of Europe in which that may suppress the reproduction and growth the oyster populations were replaced by cockles of commercially utilizable organisms while not and mussels. The newcomers were present in affecting or even sometimes encouraging the small numbers while the oysters flourished but growth of noncommercial forms. greatly increased in abundance when the removal Descriptions of oyster bottoms usually provide of oysters left more space for them to settle. information regarding their location, type of Many well-documented examples may be cited bottom, depth and salinity of water, the principal of the destruction of oyster bottoms by sand and species associated with oysters, and the abundance mud stirred up by dredging operations in nearby or absence of predators. This type of description areas. One incidence of this nature occurred in is found in the papers of Dean (1892) on South 1935 to 1938 near the Buzzards Bay entrance to Carolina grounds; Moore on the condition and the Cape Cod canal, Mass., where valuable oyster extent of oyster grounds in Texas (1907), Louisi­ grounds were buried under 8 to 12 inches of ana (1899), Mississippi Sound (1913), James material that was disturbed by dredging and then River, Virginia (1910), Delaware Bay (1911); settled on the oyster grounds. Three to four Pearse and Wharton (1938) on oysters of Apala­ years later the area was repopulated by quahogs and continues to remain highly productive, chicola Bay; Frey (1946) on oyster bars in the although the species composition has been Potomac River; Hagmeier and Kandler (1927) completely changed. on oyster banks in North Freisland shoals, Discounting minor local variations, the basic Germany; Joubin on the coast of France (1906, requirements of the oyster are identical regardless 1908), and many others.' of the location of the oyster bottoms. The Because of the great diversity in the kind suitability of a bottom area for the development and number of species forming an oyster com­ of a productive oyster community can,. therefore, munity only a few generalizations can be drawn be evaluated if the effects of different environ­ from descriptive data: 1) in common with other mental factors are estimated. bottom communities, oyster grounds of the warm Principal factors favorable for the propagation,
Recommended publications
  • Bibliography Database of Living/Fossil Sharks, Rays and Chimaeras (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii, Holocephali) Papers of the Year 2016
    www.shark-references.com Version 13.01.2017 Bibliography database of living/fossil sharks, rays and chimaeras (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii, Holocephali) Papers of the year 2016 published by Jürgen Pollerspöck, Benediktinerring 34, 94569 Stephansposching, Germany and Nicolas Straube, Munich, Germany ISSN: 2195-6499 copyright by the authors 1 please inform us about missing papers: [email protected] www.shark-references.com Version 13.01.2017 Abstract: This paper contains a collection of 803 citations (no conference abstracts) on topics related to extant and extinct Chondrichthyes (sharks, rays, and chimaeras) as well as a list of Chondrichthyan species and hosted parasites newly described in 2016. The list is the result of regular queries in numerous journals, books and online publications. It provides a complete list of publication citations as well as a database report containing rearranged subsets of the list sorted by the keyword statistics, extant and extinct genera and species descriptions from the years 2000 to 2016, list of descriptions of extinct and extant species from 2016, parasitology, reproduction, distribution, diet, conservation, and taxonomy. The paper is intended to be consulted for information. In addition, we provide information on the geographic and depth distribution of newly described species, i.e. the type specimens from the year 1990- 2016 in a hot spot analysis. Please note that the content of this paper has been compiled to the best of our abilities based on current knowledge and practice, however,
    [Show full text]
  • Status of the Fisheries Report an Update Through 2008
    STATUS OF THE FISHERIES REPORT AN UPDATE THROUGH 2008 Photo credit: Edgar Roberts. Report to the California Fish and Game Commission as directed by the Marine Life Management Act of 1998 Prepared by California Department of Fish and Game Marine Region August 2010 Acknowledgements Many of the fishery reviews in this report are updates of the reviews contained in California’s Living Marine Resources: A Status Report published in 2001. California’s Living Marine Resources provides a complete review of California’s three major marine ecosystems (nearshore, offshore, and bays and estuaries) and all the important plants and marine animals that dwell there. This report, along with the Updates for 2003 and 2006, is available on the Department’s website. All the reviews in this report were contributed by California Department of Fish and Game biologists unless another affiliation is indicated. Author’s names and email addresses are provided with each review. The Editor would like to thank the contributors for their efforts. All the contributors endeavored to make their reviews as accurate and up-to-date as possible. Additionally, thanks go to the photographers whose photos are included in this report. Editor Traci Larinto Senior Marine Biologist Specialist California Department of Fish and Game [email protected] Status of the Fisheries Report 2008 ii Table of Contents 1 Coonstripe Shrimp, Pandalus danae .................................................................1-1 2 Kellet’s Whelk, Kelletia kelletii ...........................................................................2-1
    [Show full text]
  • Estuarine Immigration by Crab Postlarvae: Mechanisms, Reliability and Adaptive Significance
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published November 26 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Estuarine immigration by crab postlarvae: mechanisms, reliability and adaptive significance John H. Christy*, Steven G. Morgan** Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apartado 2072, Balboa, Ancon, Panama or Unit 0948, APO AA 34002-0948, USA ABSTRACT: Most estuarine crab larvae emigrate from estuaries soon after they hatch, develop to the postlarval stage in the coastal ocean and then immigrate to estuaries and settle in adult habitats. We studled the patterns and mechanisms of immigration by postlarvae of 9 crab taxa in the small, high- salinity North Inlet estuary (South Carolina, USA) by sampling the plankton daily for 32 d over the length of the estuary. A concurrent study of larval production and flux showed that all taxa rapidly erni- grate, thereby establishing empirically the importance of immigration in this estuary and giving us the rare opportunity to compare the relative species abundance of emigrating larvae and immigrating post- larvae. Contrary to the popular view that planktonic developn~entin the sea uncouples larval recruit- ment from production, the community composition of emigrants and immigrants were comparable. Postlarvae immigrated at night and primarily on large amplitude flood tides. We show that this pattern is common in other estuaries and we argue that it reduces fish predation on immigrating postlarvae. Saltatory, up-estuary immigration was evident in 5 species that moved from the lower to the upper estuary (4 km) in 1 to 3 d. Although immigration rates have not been measured directly in other estu- aries, a study of postlarval settlement in Mobile Bay suggests that rates may vary geographically in relation to variation in the tidal regime.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphology, 18S Rrna Gene Sequence and Life History of a New Polydora Species (Polychaeta: Spionidae) from Northeastern Japan
    Vol. 18: 31–45, 2013 AQUATIC BIOLOGY Published online January 23 doi: 10.3354/ab00485 Aquat Biol Morphology, 18S rRNA gene sequence and life history of a new Polydora species (Polychaeta: Spionidae) from northeastern Japan Wataru Teramoto*, Waka Sato-Okoshi, Hirokazu Abe, Goh Nishitani, Yoshinari Endo Laboratory of Biological Oceanography, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 981-8555, Japan ABSTRACT: A new species of spionid polychaete, Polydora onagawaensis, is described from mol- lusk shells in Pacific waters of northeastern Japan. Its nuclear 18S rRNA gene sequence as well as its morphology, reproductive features, life history and infestation characteristics are reported. Polydora onagawaensis sp. nov. belongs to the Polydora ciliata/websteri group and has a moder- ate size and variable black pigmentation on the palps and body. Up to 115 worms were found bor- ing in a single scallop shell from suspended cultures in Onagawa Bay, with significantly higher numbers in the right than in the left valve. Females repeatedly deposited a string of egg capsules from around October to June (seawater temperature was below 15°C). The larvae developed inside the egg capsules for 2 wk (10°C, laboratory conditions), until the 3-chaetiger stage, before being released as planktonic larvae. The main spawning occurred in December, recruitment onto the shells increased after January, and most large worms disappeared between July and October. Thus, the estimated life span is around 1.5 yr after settlement. Details on biology and gene infor- mation not only contribute to distinguishing the species from other polydorids similar in morpho- logy, but also allow control of polydorid infestation in mollusk aquaculture.
    [Show full text]
  • A List of Common and Scientific Names of Fishes from the United States And
    t a AMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETY QL 614 .A43 V.2 .A 4-3 AMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETY Special Publication No. 2 A List of Common and Scientific Names of Fishes -^ ru from the United States m CD and Canada (SECOND EDITION) A/^Ssrf>* '-^\ —---^ Report of the Committee on Names of Fishes, Presented at the Ei^ty-ninth Annual Meeting, Clearwater, Florida, September 16-18, 1959 Reeve M. Bailey, Chairman Ernest A. Lachner, C. C. Lindsey, C. Richard Robins Phil M. Roedel, W. B. Scott, Loren P. Woods Ann Arbor, Michigan • 1960 Copies of this publication may be purchased for $1.00 each (paper cover) or $2.00 (cloth cover). Orders, accompanied by remittance payable to the American Fisheries Society, should be addressed to E. A. Seaman, Secretary-Treasurer, American Fisheries Society, Box 483, McLean, Virginia. Copyright 1960 American Fisheries Society Printed by Waverly Press, Inc. Baltimore, Maryland lutroduction This second list of the names of fishes of The shore fishes from Greenland, eastern the United States and Canada is not sim- Canada and the United States, and the ply a reprinting with corrections, but con- northern Gulf of Mexico to the mouth of stitutes a major revision and enlargement. the Rio Grande are included, but those The earlier list, published in 1948 as Special from Iceland, Bermuda, the Bahamas, Cuba Publication No. 1 of the American Fisheries and the other West Indian islands, and Society, has been widely used and has Mexico are excluded unless they occur also contributed substantially toward its goal of in the region covered. In the Pacific, the achieving uniformity and avoiding confusion area treated includes that part of the conti- in nomenclature.
    [Show full text]
  • Relationship Between Pea Crab (Pinnotheres Maculatus) Parasitism and Gonad Mass of the Bay Scallop (Argopecten Irradians)
    Gulf and Caribbean Research Volume 12 Issue 1 January 2000 Relationship Between Pea Crab (Pinnotheres maculatus) Parasitism and Gonad Mass of the Bay Scallop (Argopecten irradians) Paul A.X. Bologna Rutgers University Marine Field Station Kenneth L. Heck Jr. Dauphin Island Sea Lab Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/gcr Part of the Marine Biology Commons Recommended Citation Bologna, P. A. and K. L. Heck Jr. 2000. Relationship Between Pea Crab (Pinnotheres maculatus) Parasitism and Gonad Mass of the Bay Scallop (Argopecten irradians). Gulf and Caribbean Research 12 (1): 43-46. Retrieved from https://aquila.usm.edu/gcr/vol12/iss1/6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18785/gcr.1201.06 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Gulf and Caribbean Research by an authorized editor of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Gulf and Caribbean Research Vol. 12, 43–46, 2000 Manuscript received June 30, 1999; accepted November 11, 1999 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PEA CRAB (PINNOTHERES MACULATUS) PARASITISM AND GONAD MASS OF THE BAY SCALLOP (ARGOPECTEN IRRADIANS) Paul A. X. Bologna1 and Kenneth L. Heck, Jr. 1Rutgers University Marine Field Station, 800 Great Bay Blvd., c/o 132 Great Bay Blvd., Tuckerton, NJ 08087, (609) 296-5260 x255, [email protected] University of South Alabama, Department of Marine Science, Dauphin Island Sea Lab, P.O. Box 369, Dauphin Island, AL 36528 ABSTRACT We investigated the prevalence of pea crabs (Pinnotheres maculatus) in bay scallops (Argopecten irradians) from 1994 through 1996 in a scallop population from St.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Pelagics Fishery in Sonora, Gulf of California
    SCS Global Services Report SMALL PELAGICS FISHERY IN SONORA, GULF OF CALIFORNIA MSC Fishery Assessment Report Public Certification Draft Report Prepared by: Dr. Carlos Alvarez (Lead, P1 & P3 Team Member) Ms. Sandra Andraka (P2 Team Member) Ms. Gabriela Anhalzer (Coordination, P2 Support) Dr. Sian Morgan (Quality Review) Natural Resources Division +1.510.452.xxxx [email protected] For Cámara Nacional de la Industria Pesquera (CANAINPES) Sonora, Mexico April 21st, 2017 2000 Powell Street, Ste. 600, Emeryville, CA 94608 USA +1.510.452.8000 main | +1.510.452.8001 fax www.SCSglobalServices.com SCS Global Services Report List of Tables .................................................................................................................... 1 List of Figures ................................................................................................................... 3 Glossary ........................................................................................................................... 6 1. Executive Summary ....................................................................................................... 9 Fishery Operations Overview ......................................................................................................................... 9 Assessment Overview .................................................................................................................................. 10 Summary of Findings ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Swimming Behavior and Prey Retention of the Polychaete Larvae Polydora Ciliata (Johnston)
    3237 The Journal of Experimental Biology 213, 3237-3246 © 2010. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd doi:10.1242/jeb.038810 Swimming behavior and prey retention of the polychaete larvae Polydora ciliata (Johnston) B. W. Hansen1, H. H. Jakobsen2,*, A. Andersen3, R. Almeda4, T. M. Pedersen1, A. M. Christensen1 and B. Nilsson1 1Roskilde University, Department of Environmental, Social and Spatial Change, P O Box 260, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark, 2National Institute of Aquatic Resources, Charlottenlund Slot, Jægersborg Allé 1, DK-2920 Charlottenlund, Denmark, 3Department of Physics and Center for Fluid Dynamics, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark and 4Institut de Ciències del Mar, CSIC P. Marítim de la Barceloneta 37-49, 08003 Barcelona, Spain *Author for correspondence at present address: National Environmental Research Institute, Aarhus University, Frederiksborgvej 399, P.O. Box 358, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark ([email protected]) SUMMARY The behavior of the ubiquitous estuarine planktotrophic spionid polychaete larvae Polydora ciliata was studied. We describe ontogenetic changes in morphology, swimming speed and feeding rates and have developed a simple swimming model using low Reynolds number hydrodynamics. In the model we assumed that the ciliary swimming apparatus is primarily composed of the prototroch and secondarily by the telotroch. The model predicted swimming speeds and feeding rates that corresponded well with the measured speeds and rates. Applying empirical data to the model, we were able to explain the profound decrease in specific feeding rates and the observed increase in the difference between upward and downward swimming speeds with larval size. We estimated a critical larval length above which the buoyancy-corrected weight of the larva exceeds the propulsion force generated by the ciliary swimming apparatus and thus forces the larva to the bottom.
    [Show full text]
  • Stable Isotope Analysis of Juvenile White Sharks Inside a Nursery Area Reveals Foraging in Demersal-Inshore Habitats and Trophic Overlap with Sympatric
    fmars-08-687738 August 5, 2021 Time: 12:53 # 1 ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 10 August 2021 doi: 10.3389/fmars.2021.687738 Stable Isotope Analysis of Juvenile White Sharks Inside a Nursery Area Reveals Foraging in Demersal-Inshore Habitats and Trophic Overlap With Sympatric Edited by: Sharks J. Marcus Drymon, 1† 1 † 1 † Mississippi State University, Emiliano García-Rodríguez , Sharon Z. Herzka * , Oscar Sosa-Nishizaki * , United States Christopher G. Lowe2 and John B. O’Sullivan3 Reviewed by: 1 Department of Biological Oceanography, Center for Scientific Research and Higher Education of Ensenada (CICESE), Simona Alessandra Ceriani, Ensenada, Mexico, 2 Department of Biological Sciences, California State University, Long Beach, CA, United States, Florida Fish and Wildlife Research 3 Monterey Bay Aquarium, Monterey, CA, United States Institute, United States Richard Reina, Monash University, Australia Knowledge about top predators’ trophic ecology is crucial for defining their role *Correspondence: in ecosystems, understanding habitat preferences, characterizing life stage-specific Sharon Z. Herzka feeding habits, and evaluating their interaction with fisheries. In the northeastern Pacific, [email protected] Oscar Sosa-Nishizaki white sharks (Carcharodon carcharias) occupy coastal habitats during the early life [email protected] stages, including Bahía Sebastián Vizcaíno (BSV) in Mexico, which is a known nursery †ORCID: area. Although BSV presumably provides high prey abundance, the trophic ecology of Emiliano García-Rodríguez orcid.org/0000-0002-9078-1300 immature white sharks is poorly understood. Carbon and nitrogen bulk stable isotope Sharon Z. Herzka analyses (SIA) were used to explore the trophic relationship of early life stages with orcid.org/0000-0001-7091-7656 their potential prey and to infer dietary overlap with sympatric sharks, while SIA of Oscar Sosa-Nishizaki orcid.org/0000-0002-3043-768X amino acids were used to estimate trophic position.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification Guide to the Planktonic Polychaete Larvae Around the Island of Helgoland (German Bight)
    HELGOL.~NDER MEERESUNTERSUCHUNGEN Helgol/inder Meeresunters. 48, 1-58 (1994) Identification guide to the planktonic polychaete larvae around the island of Helgoland (German Bight) S. Plate* & E. Husemann* * Biologische Anstalt Helgoland (Meeresstation); D-27483 Helgoland, Federal Republic of Germany ABSTRACT: The purpose of this work is to provide the means of identifying the planktonic larvae of the polychaete species appearing in the plankton around the island of Helgoland (North Sea). During a three-year survey in this area, the larvae of 54 species out of 24 families belonging to the orders Orbiniida, Spionida, Capitelhda, Phyllodocida, Oweniida, Terebelhda, Sabelhda and the former Archiannelida have been recorded. Illustrated keys to the families, genera and species are presented. To facilitate the identification, additional descriptions and information about the seasonal appearance of the species are given. INTRODUCTION More than 13 000 species of polychaetous annelids take part in the marine benthos communities worldwide. Their distribution, species composition and population density are monitored within various benthos surveys. For the North Sea, especially the German Bight and the Wadden Sea, much information about the benthic polychaete fauna is available (Caspers, 1950; Stripp, 1969; DSrjes, 1977; Rachor & Gerlach, 1978; Gillandt, 1979; Salzwedel et al., 1985; Rachor, 1990; Bosselmann, 1991; Kr6ncke, 1991). In contrast, the holoplanktonic polychaete species and the meroplanktonic polychaete larvae, which are only part of the plankton during a more or less expanded phase of their ontogenesis, have never received much attention. Meroplanktonic polychaete larvae are seldomly recorded during studies monitoring the North Sea plankton (Smidt, 1951; Giere, 1968; Fransz, 1981; Bosselmann, 1989; Belgrano et al., 1990).
    [Show full text]
  • Worms, Germs, and Other Symbionts from the Northern Gulf of Mexico CRCDU7M COPY Sea Grant Depositor
    h ' '' f MASGC-B-78-001 c. 3 A MARINE MALADIES? Worms, Germs, and Other Symbionts From the Northern Gulf of Mexico CRCDU7M COPY Sea Grant Depositor NATIONAL SEA GRANT DEPOSITORY \ PELL LIBRARY BUILDING URI NA8RAGANSETT BAY CAMPUS % NARRAGANSETT. Rl 02882 Robin M. Overstreet r ii MISSISSIPPI—ALABAMA SEA GRANT CONSORTIUM MASGP—78—021 MARINE MALADIES? Worms, Germs, and Other Symbionts From the Northern Gulf of Mexico by Robin M. Overstreet Gulf Coast Research Laboratory Ocean Springs, Mississippi 39564 This study was conducted in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA, Office of Sea Grant, under Grant No. 04-7-158-44017 and National Marine Fisheries Service, under PL 88-309, Project No. 2-262-R. TheMississippi-AlabamaSea Grant Consortium furnish ed all of the publication costs. The U.S. Government is authorized to produceand distribute reprints for governmental purposes notwithstanding any copyright notation that may appear hereon. Copyright© 1978by Mississippi-Alabama Sea Gram Consortium and R.M. Overstrect All rights reserved. No pari of this book may be reproduced in any manner without permission from the author. Primed by Blossman Printing, Inc.. Ocean Springs, Mississippi CONTENTS PREFACE 1 INTRODUCTION TO SYMBIOSIS 2 INVERTEBRATES AS HOSTS 5 THE AMERICAN OYSTER 5 Public Health Aspects 6 Dcrmo 7 Other Symbionts and Diseases 8 Shell-Burrowing Symbionts II Fouling Organisms and Predators 13 THE BLUE CRAB 15 Protozoans and Microbes 15 Mclazoans and their I lypeiparasites 18 Misiellaneous Microbes and Protozoans 25 PENAEID
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of the Fishes of the Monterey Bay Area Including Elkhorn Slough, the San Lorenzo, Pajaro and Salinas Rivers
    f3/oC-4'( Contributions from the Moss Landing Marine Laboratories No. 26 Technical Publication 72-2 CASUC-MLML-TP-72-02 A CHECKLIST OF THE FISHES OF THE MONTEREY BAY AREA INCLUDING ELKHORN SLOUGH, THE SAN LORENZO, PAJARO AND SALINAS RIVERS by Gary E. Kukowski Sea Grant Research Assistant June 1972 LIBRARY Moss L8ndillg ,\:Jrine Laboratories r. O. Box 223 Moss Landing, Calif. 95039 This study was supported by National Sea Grant Program National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration United States Department of Commerce - Grant No. 2-35137 to Moss Landing Marine Laboratories of the California State University at Fresno, Hayward, Sacramento, San Francisco, and San Jose Dr. Robert E. Arnal, Coordinator , ·./ "':., - 'I." ~:. 1"-"'00 ~~ ~~ IAbm>~toriesi Technical Publication 72-2: A GI-lliGKL.TST OF THE FISHES OF TtlE MONTEREY my Jl.REA INCLUDING mmORH SLOUGH, THE SAN LCRENZO, PAY-ARO AND SALINAS RIVERS .. 1&let~: Page 14 - A1estria§.·~iligtro1ophua - Stone cockscomb - r-m Page 17 - J:,iparis'W10pus." Ribbon' snailt'ish - HE , ,~ ~Ei 31 - AlectrlQ~iu.e,ctro1OphUfi- 87-B9 . .', . ': ". .' Page 31 - Ceb1diehtlrrs rlolaCewi - 89 , Page 35 - Liparis t!01:f-.e - 89 .Qhange: Page 11 - FmWulns parvipin¢.rl, add: Probable misidentification Page 20 - .BathopWuBt.lemin&, change to: .Mhgghilu§. llemipg+ Page 54 - Ji\mdJ11ui~~ add: Probable. misidentifioation Page 60 - Item. number 67, authOr should be .Hubbs, Clark TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 AREA OF COVERAGE 1 METHODS OF LITERATURE SEARCH 2 EXPLANATION OF CHECKLIST 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 4 TABLE 1
    [Show full text]