Hydrogeology of the Nishnabotna River Basin Randolph Stone Iowa State University

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hydrogeology of the Nishnabotna River Basin Randolph Stone Iowa State University Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1971 Hydrogeology of the Nishnabotna River Basin Randolph Stone Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Stone, Randolph, "Hydrogeology of the Nishnabotna River Basin " (1971). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 4922. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/4922 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 71-26,896 STONE, Randolph, 1940- HYDROGEOLOGY OF THE NISHNABOTNA RIVER BASIN. Iowa State University, Ph.D., 1971 Geology University Microfilms, A XEROX Company, Ann Arbor, Michigan THIS DISSERTATION HAS BEEN MICROFILMED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED Hydrogeology of the Nishnafaotna River Basin by Randolph Stone A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major Subject: Water Resources Approved: Signature was redacted for privacy. In Charge of Major Work Signature was redacted for privacy. Signature was redacted for privacy. Iowa State University Of Science and Technology Ames, Iowa 1971 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 Objectives and Purpose 1 Location of Study Area 2 Previous Work 2 METHODS OF STUDY 6 Compilation of Data 6 Water Well Field Check 7 Seismic Refraction Profiling 9 Test Hole Drilling 10 Other Methods 11 POST-MISSISSIPPIAN GEOLOGY OF THE BASIN 12 Surface Topography 12 Pleistocene Stratigraphy 16 Bedrock Topography 19 Pleistocene Sand and Gravel Deposits 24 Rocks of the Dakota Group 31 ' Rocks of the Pennsylvanian System 36 Analysis of Refraction Data and Seismic Refraction Profiles 37 INT^ASINAL AND EXTRABASINAL GROUNDWATER MOVEMENT 55 Areal Distribution of Hydraulic Head Potential 55 Relation of Hydraulic Head Potential to Topography and Geology 59 TEMPORAL VARIATION OF GROUNDWATER QUALITY 62 iii Page LOW-FLOW OF THE WEST NISHNABOTNA RIVER 74 Analysis of Low-Flow Partial-Record Station Data 74 Low-Flow Measurements 81 INTERRELATION OF STREAM AND GROUNDWATER FLOW, WEST NISHNABOTNA RIVER 88 Sections along the West Nishnabotna River 88 Sections through the Fremont Channel 101 Section through the Glenwood Chute 109 AREAL VARIATION OF GROUNDWATER QUALITY 112 Nitrate " 112 Sulfate 115 Chloride 118 SWJMARY OF CONCLUSIONS 122 REFERENCES CITED 125 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 128 APPENDIX A: BOREHOLE DATA 130 APPENDIX B: GROUNDWATER CHEMICAL ANALYSES 147 APPENDIX C. SEISMIC DATA 156 APPENDIX D: MONITORED WELL WATER ANALYSES 160 APPENDIX E: ANOV, VARIATION OF GROUNDWATER QUALITY WITH TIME 164 APPENDIX F: GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS, DRIFT AQUIFER MATERIAL 171 APPENDIX G: LOW-FLOW WATER QUALITY, WEST NISHNABOTNA RIVER 178 iv LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1. Summary of effective grain size-permeability correlation 30 Table 2. Estimated ranges of error in water analysis 63 Table 3. Summary of temporal variation of groundwater quality 65 Table 4. Maximum ranges of concentration variation, monitored water wells 73 Table 5. ANOV, discharge per unit drainage area. West Nishnabotna River 75 Table 6- Discharge per unit drainage area (csm). West Nishnabotna River 76 Table 7. ANOV, change in discharge per unit change in drainage area. West Nishnabotna River 77 Table 8. Change in discharge per unit change in drainage area, A Q/AA (csm). West Nishnabotna River 78 Table 9. ANOV, change in discharge per unit drainage area. West Nishnabotna River 79 Table 10. Change in discharge per unit drainage area, AQ/A, (csm). West Nishnabotna River ' 80 Table 11. Low-flow discharge. West Nishnabotna River and tribu­ taries, 4-8 November, 1969 83 Table 12. Low-flow discharge. West Nishnabotna River and tribu­ taries, 13-20 November, 1969 85 Table 13. Water quality comparisons, section L-L' 97 Table 14. ANOV, variation of log specific conductance and log chloride concentration in groundwater with distance from Henderson 100 Table 15. Post-Cherokee borehole data summary 131 Table 16. Post-Cherokee groundwater chemical analyses 148 Table 17. Seismic data summary 157 Table 18. Monitored well water chemical analyses 161 V Page Table 19. ANOV, temporal variation of groundwater quality 165 Table 20. Low-flow water quality. West Nishnabotna River 179 vi LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 1. Geographic locations and borehole distribution, Nishna- botna River Basin 4 Figure 2. General land surface topography, Nishnabotna River Basin 15 Figure 3. Bedrock topography, Nishnabotna River Basin 21 Figure 4. Pleistocene aquifer distribution, Nishnabotna River Basin 27 Figure 5. Size gradation: Platte River bottom sample, pro-glacial sand sample from Glenwood Chute 33 Figure 6. Bedrock geologic map, Nishnabotna River Basin 35 Figure 7. Refraction profile J-J', across Fremont Channel 40 Figure 8. Refraction profile D-D', across Fremont Channel 41 Figure 9. Refraction profile C-C 43 Figure 10. Refraction profile B-B', across Glenwood Chute 45 Figure 11. Refraction profile H-H' 47 Figure 12. Refraction profile I-I' 49 Figure 13. Refraction profile K-K' 50 Figure 14. Refraction profile E-E* 52 Figure 15. Refraction profile F-F' 53 Figure 16. Refraction profile G-G' 54 Figure 17. Hydraulic head potential, basal drift, and upper bed­ rock aquifers 58 Figure 18. Variation of total hardness with time 67 Figure 19. Variation of sulfate concentration with time 69 Figure 20. Variation of chloride concentration with time 71 Figure 21. Geologic section along West Nishnabotna River 89 Figure 22. Hydrologie section along West Nishnabotna River 90 vii Page Figure 23. Water quality section along West Nishnabotna River 95 Figure 24. Geologic section through the Fremont Channel 102 Figure 25. Hydrologie section through the Fremont Channel 103 Figure 26. Water quality section through the Fremont Channel 106 Figure 27. Variation of groundwater chloride concentration along path of flow, section M-M' 108 Figure 28. Hydrogeologic section through Glenwood Chute 110 Figure 29. Occurrence of nitrate in groundwater of basal drift and upper bedrock aquifers 114 Figure 30. Sulfate concentration, groundwater of basal drift, and upper bedrock aquifers 117 Figure 31. Chloride concentrations, groundwater of basal drift, and upper bedrock aquifers 120 Figure 32. Size gradation: gravel sample, test hole T34 173 Figure 33. Size gradation: aquifer samples, test hole T155.1 175 Figure 34. Size gradation: aquifer sample, test hole T584.1 177 1 INTRODUCTION Objectives and Purpose This hydrogeologic investigation of the Nishnabotna River Basin was undertaken to satisfy three prime objectives. The first was to prospect for and locate any zones of appreciable groundwater inflow to the basin and/or groundwater outflow from it, other than at the basin outlet. The purpose for accomplishing this objective was to test, in a glacial terrain underlain by a bedrock valley system, the validity of the assumption com­ monly applied in basin water budget studies that the quantity of ground­ water inflow is equal to that of groundwater outflow over a period of years. The second objective of the study was to relate stream flow on the West Nishnabotna River to saturated groundwater flow in the system composed of the glacial drift and alluvium and the uppermost bedrock units over which the river flows. As a part of this phase of the study, a concise account of certain salient features of the basin groundwater flow field is to be given. It was known that groundwater discharge to stream flow affects its quantity and quality, and it seemed appropriate to investigate the possibility that under certain conditions, surface stream flow may affect groundwater quantities and quality. A third objective of the study was to report, generally and specifi­ cally, on the occurrence of sources of groundwater in the glacial drift and the uppermost bedrock units, as a resource evaluation. The purpose for this objective is fairly obvious and the need for it is pointed out by the Iowa Natural Resources Council in their survey of water resources and water 2 problems in the Nishnabotna River Basin (Iowa Natural Resources Council, 1955). The basin unit, rather than some political unit or combination of units, was chosen for study because physically it represents a relatively complete system in which surface water flow and most groundwater flow is controlled by basin configuration. Location of Study Area The Nishnabotna River Basin is located in southwestern Iowa within the Missouri River Basin (Figure 1). It is bounded on the east by the drainage areas of the Des Moines River, Nodaway River, and Tarkio Creek and on the west by the watersheds of the Boyer River and other smaller tributaries of the Missouri River. The total basin area is 2995 square miles, of which 2900 square miles are located in portions of 12 Iowa counties. The basin contains about 5.2 percent of the area of the state and is the fifth largest river basin in Iowa. The actual study area overlaps the basin divide by from two to six miles. Previous Work The only hydrogeologic study covering the area of the Nishnabotna River Basin, prior to this effort, was a county by county survey of groundwater resources as a descriptive resource catalogue (Norton ^et al., 1912) and pub­ lished as U.S.G.S. Water-Supply Paper
Recommended publications
  • Missouri River Floodplain from River Mile (RM) 670 South of Decatur, Nebraska to RM 0 at St
    Hydrogeomorphic Evaluation of Ecosystem Restoration Options For The Missouri River Floodplain From River Mile (RM) 670 South of Decatur, Nebraska to RM 0 at St. Louis, Missouri Prepared For: U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 3 Minneapolis, Minnesota Greenbrier Wetland Services Report 15-02 Mickey E. Heitmeyer Joseph L. Bartletti Josh D. Eash December 2015 HYDROGEOMORPHIC EVALUATION OF ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION OPTIONS FOR THE MISSOURI RIVER FLOODPLAIN FROM RIVER MILE (RM) 670 SOUTH OF DECATUR, NEBRASKA TO RM 0 AT ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI Prepared For: U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 3 Refuges and Wildlife Minneapolis, Minnesota By: Mickey E. Heitmeyer Greenbrier Wetland Services Advance, MO 63730 Joseph L. Bartletti Prairie Engineers of Illinois, P.C. Springfield, IL 62703 And Josh D. Eash U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 3 Water Resources Branch Bloomington, MN 55437 Greenbrier Wetland Services Report No. 15-02 December 2015 Mickey E. Heitmeyer, PhD Greenbrier Wetland Services Route 2, Box 2735 Advance, MO 63730 www.GreenbrierWetland.com Publication No. 15-02 Suggested citation: Heitmeyer, M. E., J. L. Bartletti, and J. D. Eash. 2015. Hydrogeomorphic evaluation of ecosystem restoration options for the Missouri River Flood- plain from River Mile (RM) 670 south of Decatur, Nebraska to RM 0 at St. Louis, Missouri. Prepared for U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 3, Min- neapolis, MN. Greenbrier Wetland Services Report 15-02, Blue Heron Conservation Design and Print- ing LLC, Bloomfield, MO. Photo credits: USACE; http://statehistoricalsocietyofmissouri.org/; Karen Kyle; USFWS http://digitalmedia.fws.gov/cdm/; Cary Aloia This publication printed on recycled paper by ii Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sediment Transport and Deposition in the Lower Missouri River During the 2011 Flood
    Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sediment Transport and Deposition in the Lower Missouri River During the 2011 Flood Chapter F of 2011 Floods of the Central United States Professional Paper 1798–F U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Front cover. Top photograph: View of flooding from Nebraska City, Nebraska, looking east across the Missouri River, August 2, 2011. Photograph by Robert Swanson, U.S. Geological Survey. Right photograph: USGS scientist collecting a sediment sample from the Missouri River at Sioux City, Iowa, September 16, 2011. Photograph by Ryan Tompkins, U.S. Geological Survey. Back cover. Sand from the 2011 flood on the flood plain in northwestern Missouri, September 22, 2012. Photograph by Robert Jacobson, U.S. Geological Survey. Sediment Transport and Deposition in the Lower Missouri River During the 2011 Flood By Jason S. Alexander, Robert B. Jacobson, and David L. Rus Chapter F of 2011 Floods of the Central United States In cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Professional Paper 1798–F U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2013 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Grand Sub-Basin
    Upper Grand Sub-basin HUC # 10280101 RAPID WATERSHED ASSESSMENT USDA NRCS 601 Business Loop 70 West Parkade Center, Suite 250 Columbia, MO 65203 Upper Grand Sub-basin HUC #10280101 Introduction ..................................................... Page 3 A rapid watershed assessment Physical Description ........................................... Page 4 (RWA) evaluates resource A. Land Use/ Land Cover...................................Page 4 conditions and needs on an B. Grassland ..................................................Page 6 8-digit hydrologic unit (HU) C. Crop History ..............................................Page 6 basis. The assessment identifies D. Public Land ...............................................Page 6 E. Soil Capability ............................................Page 7 the primary resource concerns F. Common Resources ......................................Page 9 for the watershed being profiled G. Streams.................................................. Page 10 and provides estimate as to H. Wetlands ................................................ Page 12 where conservation investments I. Relief Map................................................ Page 13 would best address the concerns J. Geology .................................................. Page 14 of landowners, conservation Resource Concerns............................................Page 16 districts, stakeholders, and A. Soils ...................................................... Page 18 others. The RWA provides B. Soil Erosion.............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Emigrants on the Overland Trail : the Wagon Trains of 1848 / Michael E
    Emigrants on the EmigrantsOverland Trailonthe OverlandTrailThe Wagon Trains of 1848 The Wagon Trains of 1848 Michael E. LaSalle Michael E. LaSalle Truman State University Press TrumanKirksville, State University Missouri Press Kirksville, Missouri Copyright © 2011 Truman State University Press, Kirksville, Missouri, 63501 All rights reserved tsup.truman.edu Cover art: William Henry Jackson (1843- 1942), Crossing the South Platte River, undated, water- color. Image courtesy Scotts Bluff National Monument. Cover design: Teresa Wheeler Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data LaSalle, Michael E., 1945– Emigrants on the Overland Trail : the wagon trains of 1848 / Michael E. LaSalle. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-935503-95-8 (pbk. : alk. paper) — ISBN 978-1-61248-021-3 (ebook) 1. Overland Trails—Description and travel. 2. Pioneers—West (U.S.)—Diaries. 3. Pioneers—West (U.S.)—Biography. 4. West (U.S.)—Description and travel. 5. Overland journeys to the Pacific. 6. Overland Trails—History—Sources. 7. Frontier and pioneer life—West (U.S.)—History— Sources. I. Title. F593.L288 2011 978'.02—dc23 2011037737 No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any format by any means without writ- ten permission from the publisher. The paper in this publication meets or exceeds the minimum requirements of the American Na- tional Standard for Information Sciences— Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48– 1992. For Yvonne, my wife and colleague Contents Illustrations, Tables, and Maps . viii Acknowledgments . xi Introduction . xiii 1 Just Five Months to Get There . 1 2 St . Joseph, a Rising Star . 14 3 Load the Wagons .
    [Show full text]
  • Road and Bridge Program
    Missouri ROAD AND BRIDGE PROGRAM 2022-2026 TABLE OF CONTENTS Message from the Director i Financial and Regional Planning Process Summary iii Reference Information iv Northwest District Construction Program 1 Northeast District Construction Program 14 Kansas City Construction Program 29 Central District Construction Program 47 St. Louis District Construction Program 67 Southwest Construction Program 90 Southeast Construction Program 116 Statewide Summary Reports 148 Operations and Maintenance Summary 150 MESSAGE FROM THE DIRECTOR The citizens of Missouri own a tremendous asset – the state transportation system. A significant component of the state system is the 33,832 miles of roads and 10,397 bridges, both of which rank among the largest for any state in the nation. On average, Missouri drivers pay $30 per month in fuel taxes and fees to fund the maintenance and improvements to this asset. Over the last 10 years, Missourians have invested in 4,333 projects totaling $10.9 billion to maintain and improve the system. Looking forward, $5.5 billion is estimated to be available for projects over the next five years for additional improvements. Since transportation needs greatly outweigh funding available, the challenge is determining the optimal projects to fund that provide the greatest return on investment to taxpayers. Across every region of the state, feedback from Missourians has consistently prioritized maintaining the existing system as the highest priority. Other priorities include projects that improve safety and reliability, spur economic growth and provide more transportation choices. With the priority of maintaining the existing system, MoDOT has developed asset management plans for each district with the goal to maintain current pavement and bridge conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of Pottawattamie County
    GEOLOGY OF POTTAWATTAMIE OOUNTY BY J. A. UDDEN. GEOLOGY OF POTTAWATTAMIE COUNTY. BY J. A. UDDEN. CONTENTS. PAGE Introduction .................. " ................ " ......................... 202 Location and Area. .. 202 Previous Investigations ........ ....................................... 202 Physiography ........................................................... .. 203 Topography. .•........... .............. ........... ................ 203 Flood Plains.. .. .................... 203 Uplands.. .. ..... ....... ........................ .. ... ..... 207 Table of Elevations ...... ............... .......................... 210 History of the Drainage ............................................... 211 Stratigraphy. .. ................ ... ......... .. ... 216 General Statement ................. " ................ " .................. 216 Deep Explorations ....... ..... ........ , ......... ..•... ............. 217 Carboniferous. -............................................... , ......... 220 Missonrian . .. ................................... 22) Cretaceous ............................................. ............. .. 233 Tertiary Erosion ...... ......... .... ...... ............................ 242 Well Records. .. ... .......................... 243 Pleistocene. .. ....................... 248 Ante-glacial Silt and S:1nrl ........................... .. ............ 249 The Bowlder Clay, Pre· Kansan ................................... 250 Valley Drift Gravel. ......................................... ....... 254 Gumbo ............
    [Show full text]
  • Iowa One Hundred Two River – 10240013 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Profile October 2009
    One Hundred Two River – 10240013 October 2009 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Profile Iowa Introduction The One Hundred Two River Rapid Watershed Assessment (RWA) provides initial estimates of where conservation investments would best address the resource concerns of landowners, conservation districts, and other community organizations and stakeholders in Iowa. These assessments help landowners and local leaders set priorities and determine the best actions to achieve their goals to conserve and improve soil and water resources. Physical Description The One Hundred Two River 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) watershed contains 496,987 acres (1) of which 250,116 acres are located in Iowa. Eighty-five percent of the watershed is in Taylor County, 15 percent in Adams County, and less than one percent in Ringgold County, (1). Ninety-eight percent of the watershed is privately owned agricultural land, 0.5 percent is publicly owned, and the remaining 1.5 percent is split between municipal areas and private conservation areas (2). Fifty percent of the watershed is in cropland, 35 percent is pasture or hayland, 7 percent is woodland, and 8 percent is split between water, wetlands, natural areas, and developed/urban areas (3). Elevations range from 1,011 feet to 1,331 feet (4). The average watershed slope is 6.7 percent (5). The primary Land Capability Class in the watershed is class 3. The Land Capability Class (LCC) breakdown for the watershed is: 1.6 percent in class 1; 29.5 percent in class 2; 48.7 percent in class 3; 18 percent in class 4; and the remaining 2.2 percent is split between classes 5, 6, 7, and 8 (6).
    [Show full text]
  • MS-3 Channel Alignment Dynamics
    Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, and the GIS User Community 1804 MS-3 6 Channel Alignment Dynamics A 5 N 1879 A MISSOURI 1 ILLINOIS I D Miles N 1894 4 3 2 I 0 5 10 er iv R e N ag Osage River 1928 s Kilometers O 0 10 20 Osage River to Mississippi River Kansas River to Grand River Platte River to Nodaway River Modern Channel Grand River to Osage River Nodaway River to Kansas River River Mile 670 to Platte River Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, and the GIS User Community 1804 7 6 MS-3 5 Channel Alignment Dynamics 1 1879 ILLINOIS M4ISSOURI 2 Miles 3 er 1894 iv Osage River R 0 5 10 ge sa O N Osage River 1928 Kilometers 0 10 20 Osage River to Mississippi River Kansas River to Grand River Platte River to Nodaway River Modern Channel Grand River to Osage River Nodaway River to Kansas River River Mile 670 to Platte River Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, and the GIS User Community 8 6 1804 MS-3 7 5 Channel Alignment Dynamics 1 3 1879 MISSOURI 2 ILLINOIS Miles e4r 1894 iv R 0 5 10 ge sa O N Osage River 1928 Kilometers 0 10 20 Osage River to Mississippi River Kansas River to Grand River Platte River to Nodaway River Modern Channel Grand River to Osage River Nodaway River to Kansas River River Mile 670 to Platte River Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, and the GIS User Community 8 6 1804 MS-3 7 5 ILLINOIS K Channel
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of Adair County By
    • GEOLOGY OF ADAIR COUNTY BY JAMES E. GOW AND JOHN L. TILTON • CONTENTS PMl;: Introduction . ........ ...... .... .. .... ..... .... .... .. ...... ..... 281 Previous G.eological Work .. ............ .' ............ ...... .. ... .. 282 Elevations Above Sea Level . .. ... ..... 283 Exposures and Deep Shafts .... .. ... .. .. ..... ........ .. ... ... ·. : ... .. ... 284 Synoptical Table of Formations .. .. ..... .... .. .. .. .. ... ... 287 Exposures East of the Divid·e ..... ... .... .. .. '. '.' . .. .. ...... 288 Sections ·of Indurated Rock West of the Divide. .... ... 29·4 Comment on Correlation and Structure.. ....... .... .......... ........ 297 Adjacent Regions . ... .......... ... .... ........ ... ... ......... .. 299 How the Horizon at Bridgewater was Ascertained .... .. ... .. 300 A Fault Plane ......... ..... ...' .... ....................... ..... .... 301 A Further Test .. ......... : .. ' . .. .... .. .... ... ... .. .. 30~ Location of thE:) Beds .. ....... ... ... .. ... ... .. ... ..... ...... .. ... 304 Section Across Adair County . .. ........ ·.. ... ... ... ..... .... 307 The' Gla.cial and Interglacial Deposits. .. ... : . ..... 307 Well Sections . ....... , .......... .. .. .... ........ .. ...... 312 Post-PleIstocene Deposits . .... .... .. ... .... ..... .... ... .... : .... 316 Paleontology ....... .... ....... ... .... ... .. ... .. ............ .. ... ......• 321 Economic Geology . ... .. ... .. ... ....... .. .. : ..... ..... ....... ... 322 Changes Incident to Human Occupation .. ...... ... .... ... .. 324
    [Show full text]
  • Platte River Watershed Inventory and Assessment
    PLATTE RIVER WATERSHED INVENTORY AND ASSESSMENT This information is based on the Platte River Watershed Inventory and Assessment prepared by Mike Bayless and Vince Travnichek Missouri Department of Conservation St. Joseph, Missouri For additional information contact: Harold A. Kerns Northwest Regional office 701 NE College Drive St. Joseph 64507 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We would like to thank numerous individuals for their assistance in preparing this document. Brian Canaday, Lynn Schrader, and Tom Wilkerson, Jr. compiled much of the base information presented in this basin plan. Mike McGhee and John Olson (Iowa DNR) provided data from fish collections and stream habitat surveys within the Iowa portion of the basin. Missouri Department of Conservation, Kansas City Fisheries Management Region staff collected fish and provided information on stream habitat from the lower portion of the basin. Debbie Banks collected data on stream gradients and channelization within the basin. Thanks to all and to any contributers not mentioned. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Platte River is a low gradient, eighth order river located in southwest Iowa and northwest Missouri. The Platte River originates in Union County, Iowa and flows southward for about 200 miles where it empties into the Missouri River near the town of Farley, Missouri. The watershed contains 2,419 square miles with 786 square miles (32.5%) in Iowa and 1,633 square miles (67.5%) in Missouri and lies within the Dissected Till Plains physiographic region. The average annual discharge for the Platte River at Sharps Station (98% of the drainage basin) is 1,925 cubic feet per second. There are 435 third order and larger streams within the basin, and major tributaries include the 102 River, Third Fork, Honey Creek, Castile Creek, and the Little Platte River.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Information for Northwestern Missouri
    O. S. GE01.061CAL smog it C5PI WATER INFORMATION FOR NORTHWESTERN MISSOURI: A PLANNING DOCUMENT U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations 82-27 Prepared in cooperation with the Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geology and Land Survey 50272 -101 REPORT DOCUMENTATION 1._REPORT NO. 3. Recipient's Accession No. PAGE 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date WATER INFORMATION FOR NORTHWESTERN MISSOURI--A PLANNING March 1982 DOCUMENT 6. 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Rept. No. John Skelton, E. J. Harvey, and D. E. Miller USGS/WRI 82-27 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Project/Task/Work Unit No. U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Division 1400 Independence Road, Mail Stop 200 11. Contract(C) or Grant(G) No. Rolla, Missouri 65401 (C) (G) 12. Sponsoring Organization Name and Address 13. Type of Report & Period Covered U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Division Final 1400 Independence Road, Mail Stop 200 Rolla, Missouri 65401 14. 15. Supplementary Notes Prepared in cooperation with Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geology and Land Survey 16. Abstract (Limit: 200 words) Water supplies are limited in much of northwestern Missouri, and water-resources data also are limited. The report presents a summary of hydrologic data and an evalu- ation of areas where future hydrologic investigations would be most useful. The largest and most dependable surface-water supplies that can be obtained without storage from tributary streams are from the lower Grand, Nodaway, and Chariton Rivers. The sources of ground water in order of quantities available are the Missouri River alluvium, glacial drift, tributary stream alluvium, and Pennsylvanian bedrock.
    [Show full text]
  • Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences
    Chapter 3, Affected Environment and Chicago to Council Bluffs-Omaha Regional Passenger Rail System Planning Study Environmental Consequences CHAPTER 3 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES Chapter 3 describes the existing social, economic, and environmental conditions in the Study Area, which serve as a baseline for comparing the potential impacts of the route, type of service, frequency of service, and station stops carried forward for detailed analysis in this Tier 1 EIS. Chapter 3 also identifies potential environmental consequences that would result from implementation of the Project as well as mitigation measures that could be used to avoid or minimize some of those potential environmental consequences. The methodology for conducting the review and evaluation of the social, economic, and environmental resources is in accordance with federal regulations and guidelines, including NEPA (42 USC 4321-4347); FRA’s Procedures for Considering Environmental Impacts (Environmental Procedures) (64 FR 28545); and guidelines published by the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) on implementing NEPA (40 CFR 1500). The Study Area for the Build Alternative is approximately 500 miles long from Chicago, Illinois, through Iowa, to Omaha, Nebraska, and 500 feet wide on each side of the existing rail centerline for a total width of 1,000 feet. The Study Area was reviewed using recent aerial and satellite high-resolution photographic imagery; maps of topography, hydrography, and other features; and the most recent geographic information system (GIS) data for a variety of environmental resources. Because of the length of the Corridor and because this is a Tier 1 analysis, field visits for resource review were not conducted.
    [Show full text]