Unverbindliche Vorableseprobe Article 98 Cooperation with Respect to Waiver of Immunity and Consent to Surrender
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court Ambos 4. Auflage 2021 ISBN 978-3-406-74384-9 C.H.BECK Erscheint vsl. März 2021 Suggested citation: [Author], in: Ambos, The Rome Statute of the ICC, 4th edition 2021, Art. [#] mn. [#] schnell und portofrei erhältlich bei beck-shop.de Die Online-Fachbuchhandlung beck-shop.de steht für Kompetenz aus Tradition. Sie gründetunverbindliche auf über 250 Jahre juristische Fachbuch-Erfahrung Vorableseprobe durch die Verlage C.H.BECK und Franz Vahlen. beck-shop.de hält Fachinformationen in allen gängigen Medienformaten bereit: über 12 Millionen Bücher, eBooks, Loseblattwerke, Zeitschriften, DVDs, Online- Datenbanken und Seminare. Besonders geschätzt wird beck-shop.de für sein umfassendes Spezialsortiment im Bereich Recht, Steuern und Wirtschaft mit rund 700.000 lieferbaren Fachbuchtiteln. Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court Article-by-Article Commentary edited by Kai Ambos Fourth Edition 2021 unverbindliche Vorableseprobe Article 98 Cooperation with respect to waiver of immunity and consent to surrender 1. The Court may not proceed with a request for surrender or assistance which would require the requested State to act inconsistently with its obligations under international law with respect to the State or diplomatic immunity of a person or property of a third State, unless the Court can first obtain the cooperation of that third State for the waiver of the immunity. 2. The Court may not proceed with a request for surrender which would require the requested State to act inconsistently with its obligations under international agreements pursuant to which the consent of a sending State is required to surrender a person of that State to the Court, unless the Court can first obtain the cooperation of the sending State for the giving of consent for the surrender. Directly Relevant Rules of Procedure and Evidence: Rule 195. Literature: See Preliminary Remarks on Part 9 and: Ahlbrecht, H. and Ambos, K., Der Fall Pinochet(s) (Nomos 1999); Akande, D., ‘Customary International Law and the Addition of New War Crimes to the Statute of the ICC’, (January 2, 2018) EJILTalk <https://www.ejiltalk.org/customary-international-law- and-the-addition-of-new-war-crimes-to-the-statute-of-the-icc/> accessed 14 Jun. 2020; id., ‘The Effect of Security Council Resolutions and Domestic Proceedings on State Obligations to Cooperate with the ICC’, (2012) 10 JICJ 299; id., ‘The Legal Nature of Security Council Referrals to the ICC and its Impact on Al Bashir’s Immunities’, (2009) 7 JICJ 333; id., ‘International Law Immunities and the International Criminal Court’ (2004) 98 AJIL 407; id. and Shah, S., ‘Immunities of State Officials, International Crimes, and Foreign Domestic Courts’, (2010) 21 EJIL 815; Ambos, K., ‘Punishment without a Sovereign? The Ius Puniendi Issue of International Criminal Law: A First Contribution to a Consistent Theory of Interna- tional Criminal Law’, (2013) 33 OJLS 293; Ascensio, H. and Bonafe, B.I., ‘L’absence d’immunité des agents de l’Etat en cas de crime international: Pourquoi en débattre encore?’, (2018) 122 RGDIP 821; Barkholdt, J. and Kulaga, J., Analytical Presentation of the Comments and Observations by States on Draft Article 7, paragraph 1, of the ILC Draft Articles on Immunity of State Officials from foreign criminal jurisdiction, United Nations General Assembly, Sixth Committee, 2017, KFG Working Paper Series, No. 14, Berlin Potsdam Research Group “The International Rule of Law: Rise or Decline?”, Berlin 2018; Benzing, M., ‘U.S. Bilateral Non-Surrender Agreements and Article 98 of the Statute of the International Criminal Court: An Exercise in the Law of Treaties’, (2004) 8 MPYbUNL 181; Bianchi, A., ‘Immunity versus Human Rights: The Pinochet Case’, (1999) 10 EJIL 237; Blommestijn, M. and Ryangaert, C., ‘Exploring the Obligations for States to Act upon the ICC’s Arrest Warrant for Omar Al-Bashir: A Legal Conflict between the Duty to Arrest and the Customary Status of Head of State Immunity’, (2010) 5 ZIS 428; Bogdan, A., ‘The United States and the International Criminal Court: Avoiding Jurisdiction through Bilateral Agreements in Reliance on Article 98’, (2008) 8 ICLRev 1; Boschiero, N., ‘The ICC Judicial Findings on Non-cooperation Against the DRC and No Immunity for Al-Bashir Based on UNSC Resolution 1593’, (2015) 13 JICJ 625; Buzzini, G.P., ‘Lights and Shadows of Immunities and Inviolability of State Officials in International Law: Some Comments on the Djibouti v. France Case’, (2009) 22 LeidenJIL 455; Broomhall, B., International Justice and the International Criminal Court: Between Sovereignty and the Rule of Law (OUP 2003); id. and Kreß, C., ‘Implementing Cooperation Duties under the Rome Statute: A Comparative Synthesis’, in: Kreß et al., Rome Statute II (2005) 515; Byers, M., unverbindlicheCustom, Power and the Power of Rules (CUP 1999); Cassese, Vorableseprobe A., ‘When may senior State officials be tried for international crimes?’, (2002) 13 EJIL 853; Chasapis-Tassinis, O., ‘Customary International Law: Interpretation from the Beginning to the End’, (2020) 31 EJIL (235); Cosnard, M., ‘Quelques observations sur les décisions de la Chambre des Lords du 25 novembre 1998 et du 24 mars 1999 dans l’affaire Pinochet’, (1999) 103 RGDIP 309; Crawford, J., Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law (OUP 9th edition 2019); id., Sands, P. and Wilde, R., In the Matter of the Statute of the ICC and in the Matter of Bilateral Agreements Sought by the United States under Article 98(2) of the Statute, (2003) <http://www. iccnow.org/documents/SandsCrawfordBIA14June03.pdf> accessed 14 Jun. 2020; Damaška, M., ‘What is Kreß Art. 98 Part 9 International Cooperation and Judicial Assistance the Point of International Criminal Justice?’, (2007) 83 ChicagoKLRev 329; d’Argent, P. and Lesaffre, P., ‘Immunities and Jus Cogens Violations’, in: Ruys et al., HB Immunities (2019) 614; Deen-Racsmány, S., ‘”Prosecutor v. Taylor”: The Status of the Special Court of Sierra Leone and its Implications for Immunity’, (2005) 18 LeidenJIL 299; de Sena, P., Diritto Internazionale e immunità funzionale degli organi statali (Giuffrè, 1996); de Souza Dias, T., ‘The Nature of the Rome Statute and the Place of International Law before the International Criminal Court’, (2019) 17 JICJ 507; Dominicé, C., ‘Quelques observations sur l’immunité de juridiction pénale de l’ancien chef d’état’, (1999) 103 RGDIP 297; Einarsen, T., The Concept of Universal Crimes in International Law (TOAEP 2012); Elphick, L.C., 'State Consent and „Official Acts“: Clearing the Muddied Waters of Immunity Ratione Materiae for Interna- tional Crimes‘, (2016) 41 The University of Western Australia Law Review 275; Fleck, D., ‘Are Foreign Military Personnel Exempt from International Criminal Jurisdiction under Status of Forces Agreements?’, (2003) 1 JICJ 651; Foakes, J., The Position of Heads of State and Senior Officials in International Law (OUP 2014); Fox, H. and Webb, P., The Law of State Immunity (OUP 3rd ed. 2013); Freedman, R. and Lemay-Hébert, N., ‘Between a Rock and a Hard Place – Immunities of the United Nations and Human Rights’, in: Ruys et al., HB Immunities (2019) 579; Frulli, M., ‘The Draft Articles on Crimes Against Humanity and Immunities of State Officials: Unfinished Business?’, (2018) 16 JICJ 775; id., ‘The Question of Charles Taylor’s Immunity’, (2004) 2 JICJ 1118; Gaerditz, K.F., ‘Ungeschriebenes Völkerrecht durch Systembildung’ (2007) 45 AVR 1; Gaeta, P., ‘Does President Al Bashir Enjoy Immunity from Arrest?’, (2009) 7 JICJ 316; id., ‘Official Capacity and Immunities’, in: Cassese et al., Rome Statute I (2002) 975; id. and Labuda, P.I., ‘Trying Sitting Heads of State: The African Union versus the ICC in the Al Bashir and Kenyatta Cases’, in: Jalloh and Bantekas, ICC and Africa (2017) 138; Galand, A.S., ‘What Counts as State Practice? The Koblenz Trial and Functional Immunity’, (May 27, 2020) Just Security <https://www. justsecurity.org/70394/> accessed 14 Jun. 2020; id., ‘The Nature of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (and its amended jurisdictional scheme)’, (2019) 17 JICJ 933; Gartner, I., ‘The Rules of Procedure and Evidence on Co-operation and Enforcement’, in: Fischer et al., Prosecution (2001) 423; Gillet, M., ‘The Call of Justice: Obligations under the Genocide Convention to Cooperate with the International Criminal Court’, (2012) 23 CLF 63; Gornig, G., ‘Immunität von Staatsoberhäuptern’, in: J. Ipsen and E. Schmidt-Jortzig (eds.), Festschrift für Dietrich Rauschning (Carl Heymann 2001) 457; Gosnell, J. and Gaeta, P., ‘Obedience to Superior Orders and Official Capacity’ in: Cassese and Gaeta, ICL (2013) 228; Harhoff, F. and Mochochoko, P., ‘International Cooperation and Judicial Assistance’, in: Lee, ICC (2001) 666; Heller, K.J., ‘What is an International Crime? (A Revisionist History)’, (2017) 58 HarvILJ 353; Horsthemke, J., Immunitäten für Staatsoberhäupter und hochrangige Regierungsmitglieder vor dem IStGH (Duncker & Humblot 2019); Huang, H., 'On Immunity of State Officials from Criminal Jurisdic- tion‘, (2014) 13 ChineseJIL 1; Iverson, J.M., ‘The Continuing Function of Article 98 of the Rome Statute’, (2012) 4 GoJIL 131; Jakobs, D., ‘The Frog that Wanted to Be an Ox. The ICC’s Approach to Immunities and Cooperation’, in: Stahn, Practice (OUP 2015) 281; Jia, B., ‘Immunity for State Officials from Foreign Jurisdiction for International Crimes’, in: M. Bergsmo and Y. Ling (eds.), State Sovereignty and International Criminal Law (TOAEP 2012) 75; Kaul, H.-P., ‘The Continuing