DOCSLIB.ORG

Georgiastarnews.Com

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

12/22/2020 NewsGuardNutritionLabel What is NewsGuard?® georgiastarnews.com A conservative news and commentary site launched in late 2020 that focuses on U.S. and Georgia politics. The site has advanced misleading claims about the 2020 election. A conservative news and commentary site launchedin late 2020 that focuses on U.S. and Georgia politics. The site has advanced misleadingclaims about the 2020 election. OwnershipandFinancing TheGeorgiaStar Newsis owned and operatedby privatelyheld Star NewsDigitalMedia,Inc.,accordingto the site. Star NewsDigitalMediawas founded in September2018 by conservativeradiohosts MichaelPatrickLeahy and Steve Gilland Tea Party activistChristinaBotteri,accordingto a companypressrelease.Leahy and Botteriarelistedas Star NewsDigitalMedia’smajorityshareholderson the company’swebsite.Gill leftthe companyin August 2019,Leahy told NewsGuardin a 2019 email. The company is registered in Delaware and based in Nashville, Tennessee. Star News DigitalMedia also owns TheOhioStar.com,TheVirginiaStar.com, TheMinnesotaSun.com,TheMichiganStar.com,and TennesseeStar.com — sites that are nearly identical in design to The Georgia Star News. Leahy, who started his career as a management consultant, is an author and contributing writer for the conservative news site Breitbart. He co- founded the Nationwide Tea Party Coalition in 2009. Four years later, in 2013, Leahy co-founded The Real Conservatives National Committee PAC and served as its treasurer until it led for termination two years later, according to Federal Election Commission documents. Botteri was also a co-founder of the Nationwide Tea Party Coalition, and In 2010, she co-founded the National Tea Party Federation, another coalition of national and regional Tea Party groups. Star News Digital Media has an associated nonpro t, called the Star News Education Foundation, that is also run by Leahy and Botteri. According to Star News Digital Media’s corporate website, the foundation has the goal “of returning K-12 education in the United States to its former status as best in the world by 2030.” The organization produces educational materials focusing on the Constitution and economic self-su ciency. Star News Digital Media earns revenue through advertising and an online store called “Flyest President” that sells Trump-related products. Content GeorgiaStarNews.compublishesnews and commentary from a conservativeperspective,which it does not clearly disclose. The site notes on the About pagethat it features “articlesreportingnews, politics,and policy at the state level,primarily from Georgia.” In addition to its coverage of Georgia,the site publishesarticles from other Star News Networksites. The site was launched in November 2020, just after the U.S. general election and less than two months before the Jan. 5, 2021, U.S. Senate runo elections in Georgia. In an unusual twist, Georgia has two U.S. Senate elections this year, and both moved to runo s when no candidate received more than 50 percent of the vote. The outcome of the two races will determine which party controls the U.S. Senate. At the time of NewsGuard’s review in December 2020, much of the site’s news coverage focused on the Senate runo s. Many articles also highlighted claims that the 2020 general election was marred by widespread fraud, echoing President Trump’s unsubstantiated claims. The site’s coverage of national issues often centered on criticism of Democrats, particularly incoming members of President-Elect Joe Biden’s administration. Typical headlines have included “Trump Campaign Estimates 38K to 45K Illegal Absentee Ballots Cast in Georgia Election,” “Attorney Lin Wood: Trump Will Be Inaugurated Based on Voter Fraud in Dominion Voting Machines,” and “Osso Continues to Accuse Perdue of Insider Trading – Even After He’s Been Cleared of Wrongdoing.” The site runs articles from the Daily Caller News Foundation and Just The News, another conservative site. Credibility GeorgiaStarNewsdoes not typically conduct originalreporting.Instead,the site summarizes news reportsfrom other right-leaningpublications or cites interviews and social media posts from Republicanpoliticians and conservative commentators.The site’s aggregatedcontentfrequently advances misleadingand unsubstantiatedclaims, particularly in its coverageof the 2020 U.S. presidentialelection. For example, a November 2020 article titled “Commentary: If All the Fraud Is Uncovered, Trump Will Win” claimed, without evidence, that “if all of the cheating in the 2020 presidential election can be uncovered and reversed, then Trump will emerge the clear winner.” The article also stated that “it’s becoming increasingly obvious that all this fraud was carefully coordinated and calculated at every level. The criminality has not been https://api.newsguardtech.com/label/georgiastarnews.com?cid=4aa2b6d4-0c5b-49ab-be67-3a9da0c77f46 1/5 12/22/2020 NewsGuardNutritionLabel haphazard or sloppy; on the contrary, the various kinds of vote manipulation appear to have taken place only in a small number of swing states. And the number of invalid votes in those states that have been credited to Biden, and of valid votes denied to Trump, seems to have been calculated very carefully so as to ensure that each of those states would be stolen from Trump and that Biden’s lead would be slim but de nitive.” Theseclaims aboutwidespreadfraud and a conspiracyto stealthe electionfromDonaldTrump arebaseless.Top electiono cials in all50 states a rmedthe integrityof the 2020 election,accordingto a New York Timesreport.Numerousfederal governmento cials and independent observershave reachedthe same conclusion.In a Nov.12,2020,statement,the U.S.Cybersecurityand InfrastructureSecurity Agency (CISA),partof the Departmentof HomelandSecurity,called the 2020 election“themost secure in Americanhistory,”stating,“Thereis no evidencethat any voting systemdeletedor lostvotes,changedvotes,or was in any way compromised.”Attorney GeneralWilliamBarr told The AssociatedPress on Dec.1, 2020, that “wehave not seen fraud on a scale that could have e ected a di erentoutcomein the election.” A November 2020 article titled “Georgia Secretary of State Brad Ra ensperger Silent on Demands He Audit Absentee Ballots” claimed that during Georgia’s recount of its presidentialvote, thousands of ballots “vanished” and were not counted. Referring to Georgia Republican Party Chairman David Shafer,the article stated that “Shafer also said thousands of ballots vanished. And no one counted them. Shafer tweeted Wednesday that one monitor discovered a 9,626 vote error in the DeKalb County hand count.” Shafer was referringto the fact that during Georgia’s hand recount of about 5 million votes cast in the 2020 general election,DeKalb County at one point mistakenly reported the number of votes for Biden in one batch of ballots. “‘One batch was labeled 10,707 for Biden and 13 for Trump — an improbable margin even by DeKalb standards. The actual count for the batch was 1,081for Biden and 13 for Trump,’ Shafer said,” Georgia Star News reported. In fact,DeKalbCounty’sresultsafter the handrecountwere unchangedfrom the totalreportedafter ElectionDay.The “error”referencedby GeorgiaStar Newswas a clericalmistakethat arose duringthe handrecount,but it did notfactor into the nalvote totals.Dueto safeguardsput in place to ensurethat counties reportaccuratevoting numbers,DeKalbcounty o cials quickly noticed that the batchof ballotscontainedan inaccuratenumber,and correctedthe guresto re ect the accuratetotals, GabrielSterling,Georgia'svotingsystemimplementationmanager,told reporters. “This iswhat happensin an audit.This is why you don't releaseinterimaudit resultsbecausehumanbeings are goingto make mistakes in a hand countaudit,”hesaid, It is also inaccurate to say that this error was discovered by a “monitor,” as it was actually noticed by a DeKalb o cial, CNN reported. Because GeorgiaStarNews.com routinely publishes unsubstantiated claims, NewsGuard has determined that the site does not gather and present information responsibly. Headlines on the site are often deceptive, and distort the content published in those articles. For example, a November 2020 article ran under the headline,“Atlanta Mayor to Face Trial for Ethics Violations in 2017 Runo Election,” suggesting Atlanta’s mayor has been indicted for ethics violations and would be appearingat a trial. However,the article notes that Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms,who is under investigation by Georgia’s State Ethics Commission for allegedly receiving unlawful donations during her 2017 mayoral campaign,would be appearingin a public hearing. Bottoms has not been charged with any crimes and is not on trial. A December 2020 article ran under the headline, “Prominent Atlanta Pastor Michael Youssef Says He Received Three Mail-In Ballots for Adult Son Who Lives Overseas,” suggesting that there are problems with the state’s mail-in voting system, since people are only allowed to submit one ballot. However, the article itself makes clear that it is not possible that Youssef received three mail-in ballots for his son, because at the time he wrote that tweet, Georgia had not yet begun sending ballots for its Jan. 5, 2021, runo election; more likely, he was receiving ballot applications for his son. “Chuck Eaton is a commissioner on the Georgia Public Service Commission. He tweeted, ‘The runo ballots have not been mailed yet. Guessing you’re receiving absentee ballot request forms from 3rd party groups (not the state)…many of whom are under investigation by @gasecofstate,’” the article explained,
Recommended publications
  • Tucker Carlson

    Tucker Carlson

    Connecting You with the World's Greatest Minds Tucker Carlson Tucker Carlson is the host of Tucker Carlson Tonight, airing on primetime on FOX, and founder of The Daily Caller, one of the largest and fastest growing news sites in the country. Carlson was previously the co-host of Fox and Friends Weekend. He joined FOX from MSNBC, where he hosted several nightly programs. Previously, he was also the co-host of Crossfire on CNN, as well the host of a weekly public affairs program on PBS. A longtime newspaper and magazine writer, Carlson has reported from around the world, including dispatches from Iraq, Pakistan, Lebanon and Vietnam. He has been a columnist for New York magazine and Reader's Digest. Carlson began his journalism career at the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette newspaper in Little Rock. His most recent book is entitled, Politicians, Partisans and Parasites: My Adventures in Cable News. He appeared on the third season of ABC’s Dancing with the Stars. In this penetrating look at today's political climate, Tucker Carlson takes audiences behind closed doors, offering a candid, up-to-the-moment analysis of events as they unfold. From a look at Congress and the agenda ahead for the next Administration, to behind-the-scenes stories from his time following Donald Trump and his campaign during the 2016 race for the White House, you can always count on Tucker for a witty, informative and frank take on the future of the Republican party and all things political..
  • Online Media and the 2016 US Presidential Election

    Online Media and the 2016 US Presidential Election

    Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Faris, Robert M., Hal Roberts, Bruce Etling, Nikki Bourassa, Ethan Zuckerman, and Yochai Benkler. 2017. Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society Research Paper. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:33759251 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA AUGUST 2017 PARTISANSHIP, Robert Faris Hal Roberts PROPAGANDA, & Bruce Etling Nikki Bourassa DISINFORMATION Ethan Zuckerman Yochai Benkler Online Media & the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This paper is the result of months of effort and has only come to be as a result of the generous input of many people from the Berkman Klein Center and beyond. Jonas Kaiser and Paola Villarreal expanded our thinking around methods and interpretation. Brendan Roach provided excellent research assistance. Rebekah Heacock Jones helped get this research off the ground, and Justin Clark helped bring it home. We are grateful to Gretchen Weber, David Talbot, and Daniel Dennis Jones for their assistance in the production and publication of this study. This paper has also benefited from contributions of many outside the Berkman Klein community. The entire Media Cloud team at the Center for Civic Media at MIT’s Media Lab has been essential to this research.
  • Camp Perry Nationals Service Rifle

    Camp Perry Nationals Service Rifle

    August 2021 Camp Perry Nationals Service Rifle The Wisconsin Juniors travelled to Ohio to compete at the National Trophy Rifle Matches at Camp Perry. We had one junior James L making the Presidents 100. James accomplished the 3 big service rifle goals in 1 year. He became a distinguished rifleman, made High master, and made the cut for the Presidents 100. Congrats James! In the National Trophy Individual match, we had 3 juniors make the cut for leg points. David H fired a nice 488-19x, first year junior Anna B was right behind him with a 485- 13x, and Thomas “TK” K fired a 482-12x. Congrats juniors on receiving leg points towards becoming distinguished. Thomas M. firing a 497-25x. This score would have been a new national record, but another junior beat Thomas by a point. Congrats Thomas! That’s some hard holding with a borrowed upper. In the 2-person junior team match, Wisconsin Juniors had 3 teams place in the top 20 and receive a freedoms fire medal. Team Mozzarella came in 13th place with a 962-26x. Team members were Sam C and James L. coached by Spencer M. Team Colby came in 9th place with a 968-19x. Team members were Anna B and David H. Mike S was the coach. Rounding out our teams in the top 20 was Team Cheddar in 2nd place. Team Cheddar fired a would-be national record score of 980-38x. Team members were Thomas M and Thomas K. Coach was Kaleb “Big Cheese” H. Congrats to all three teams! A big thank you to all the coaches, parents and volunteers that make this all possible! We had a total of nine juniors competing this year.
  • Coronavirus Misinformation Weekly Briefing 18-05-2020

    Coronavirus Misinformation Weekly Briefing 18-05-2020

    COVID-19 Series COMPROP Coronavirus Misinformation Weekly Briefing 18-05-2020 Social Media Misinformation on German Intelligence Reports Coronavirus Misinformation Weekly Briefing 18-05-2020 Hubert Au, Jonathan Bright, Philip N. Howard SUMMARY Given the evolving nature of the coronavirus pandemic—and public understanding of the crisis—we provide a weekly briefing about the spread of coronavirus misinformation across multiple social media platforms. For the seven days prior to 14-05-2020 we find: • Of all the junk news that social media users engaged with last week, 33% of it came from state-backed news agencies, and 83% of engagement with state backed agencies involves media outlets from Russia and China. • In total, articles produced by junk health news sources were engaged with four million times this week. On average, articles from state-backed media sources nonetheless stimulated the most engagement. • Thematically, prominent junk health news narratives this week included (1) misinformation around German intelligence reports alleging the WHO withholding information on Chinese request, and (2) attacks on Democrats over the HEROES Act. and the trends for five prominent English-language INTRODUCTION sources of credible news and information; two from the Using an actively curated list of major sources of junk UK and three from the US: BBC News, CNN, The health news and state-backed sources, we track the Guardian, The New York Times and The Washington spread of misleading, polarizing, and inflammatory Post. coronavirus content on social media. Sources from state-backed media include information operations and The “social distribution network” of an outlet is the sum editorially controlled national media organizations.
  • The Tea Party Movement As a Modern Incarnation of Nativism in the United States and Its Role in American Electoral Politics, 2009-2014

    The Tea Party Movement As a Modern Incarnation of Nativism in the United States and Its Role in American Electoral Politics, 2009-2014

    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 10-2014 The Tea Party Movement as a Modern Incarnation of Nativism in the United States and Its Role in American Electoral Politics, 2009-2014 Albert Choi Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/343 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] The Tea Party Movement as a Modern Incarnation of Nativism in the United States and Its Role in American Electoral Politics, 2009-2014 by Albert Choi A master’s thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Political Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, The City University of New York 2014 i Copyright © 2014 by Albert Choi All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical reviews and certain other noncommercial uses permitted by copyright law. ii This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Political Science in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Master of Arts. THE City University of New York iii Abstract The Tea Party Movement as a Modern Incarnation of Nativism in the United States and Its Role in American Electoral Politics, 2009-2014 by Albert Choi Advisor: Professor Frances Piven The Tea Party movement has been a keyword in American politics since its inception in 2009.
  • Divergent Coverage of the Early Tea Party Movement in The

    Divergent Coverage of the Early Tea Party Movement in The

    DIVERGENT COVERAGE OF THE EARLY TEA PARTY MOVEMENT IN THE WASHINGTON TIMES AND THE NEW YORK TIMES THESIS Presented to the Graduate Council of Texas State University-San Marcos In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree Master of ARTS Mass Communication By George Hatt, B.A. San Marcos, Texas May 2011 DIVERGENT COVERAGE OF THE EARLY TEA PARTY MOVEMENT IN THE WASHINGTON TIMES AND THE NEW YORK TIMES Committee Members Approved: _____________________________ Dr. Tom Grimes, Chair _____________________________ Dr. Cindy Royal _____________________________ Dr. Bob Price Approved: ____________________________________ Dr. J. Michael Willoughby Dean of the Graduate College COPYRIGHT By George Hatt 2011 DEDICATION For my fiancee Cindy Schiurring. Thanks for being there through the rough times. FAIR USE AND AUTHOR’S PERMISSION STATEMENT Fair Use This work is protected by the Copyright Laws of the United States (Public Law 94-553, section 107). Consistent with fair use as defined in the Copyright Laws, brief quotations from this material are allowed with proper acknowledgment. Use of this material for financial gain without the author’s express written permission is not allowed. Duplication Permission As the copyright holder of this work I, George Hatt, authorize duplication of this work, in whole or in part, for educational or scholarly purposes only. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my fiancee, Cindy Schiurring, for sticking with me through a military deployment and more than two years of separation as I worked as an editor at a small-town paper while she pursued her masters degree. She encouraged me to pursue my graduate studies. I would also like to thank Dr.
  • The Oregonian Portland Police Chief Says

    The Oregonian Portland Police Chief Says

    The Oregonian Portland Police Chief Says Federal Cops Were Told They'd Get Help at ICE Protest If They Were in Danger By Everton Bailey August 1, 2018 Portland Police Chief Danielle Outlaw announced Wednesday that the bureau told the Federal Protective Service it would respond to their officers' emergency calls if their safety was at risk during a 38-day-long protest outside Portland's Immigration and Customs Enforcement Building. The statement comes two days after the union representing ICE employees sent a letter to Portland Mayor Ted Wheeler claiming he banned local police from responding to 911 calls from federal officers during the Occupy ICE demonstrations. The union said it left employees vulnerable to threats of violence and harassment. In a response Tuesday, Wheeler said he ordered no such policy. Outlaw said police officers responded to 41 calls for service during the encampment at the ICE building in Southwest Portland, which began June 17 and ended July 25. Portland police made no arrests, and there were no significant injuries to anyone around the camp, she said. The demonstration was to protest the Trump administration's policy of separating migrant children from their parents at the U.S.-Mexico border. The encampment caused the ICE building to be closed for eight days because of security concerns. Editorial: The Problem With Treating Portland Police As Mayor's Personal Army The Oregonian Editorial Board July 31, 2018 When protesters first gathered at the Immigration and Customs Enforcement office six weeks ago, Portland
  • The Tea Party: Burgeoning Or Beaten?

    The Tea Party: Burgeoning Or Beaten?

    Augsburg Honors Review Volume 5 Article 6 2012 The eT a Party: Burgeoning or Beaten? Philip Olsen Florida Alantic University Alexa Robinson Florida Atlantic University Follow this and additional works at: https://idun.augsburg.edu/honors_review Part of the American Politics Commons Recommended Citation Olsen, Philip and Robinson, Alexa (2012) "The eT a Party: Burgeoning or Beaten?," Augsburg Honors Review: Vol. 5 , Article 6. Available at: https://idun.augsburg.edu/honors_review/vol5/iss1/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Undergraduate at Idun. It has been accepted for inclusion in Augsburg Honors Review by an authorized editor of Idun. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Teo Party: Burgeoning or Beaten? 55 The Tea Party: Burgeoning or Beaten? Philip Olsen, Florida Atlantic University and Alexa Robsinson, Florida Atlantic University Philip Olsen and Alexa Robinson are sophomores at Florida Atlantic University and presented this paper at the 2011NCHC conference in Phoenix, Arizona. Philip is continuing to pursue his bachelor\ degree in English and philosophy and expects to graduate in 2014. 56 The Tea Party: Burgeoningor BgatqX I. Introduction The Tea Party is a grassroots political movement which has gained a considerable following since its inception in 2009.Its platform centers on a single issue -- greater fiscal responsibility and conservatism on the part of each respective level of government. In this paper we examine the question of whether or not the Tea Party will develop into a viable political entity. We concluded early on in the process of researching this paper that extensive statistical analysis would only be a fruitless endeavor because of the contemporaneity of the Tea Party movement.
  • Download File

    Download File

    Tow Center for Digital Journalism CONSERVATIVE A Tow/Knight Report NEWSWORK A Report on the Values and Practices of Online Journalists on the Right Anthony Nadler, A.J. Bauer, and Magda Konieczna Funded by the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation. Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 Introduction 7 Boundaries and Tensions Within the Online Conservative News Field 15 Training, Standards, and Practices 41 Columbia Journalism School Conservative Newswork 3 Executive Summary Through much of the 20th century, the U.S. news diet was dominated by journalism outlets that professed to operate according to principles of objectivity and nonpartisan balance. Today, news outlets that openly proclaim a political perspective — conservative, progressive, centrist, or otherwise — are more central to American life than at any time since the first journalism schools opened their doors. Conservative audiences, in particular, express far less trust in mainstream news media than do their liberal counterparts. These divides have contributed to concerns of a “post-truth” age and fanned fears that members of opposing parties no longer agree on basic facts, let alone how to report and interpret the news of the day in a credible fashion. Renewed popularity and commercial viability of openly partisan media in the United States can be traced back to the rise of conservative talk radio in the late 1980s, but the expansion of partisan news outlets has accelerated most rapidly online. This expansion has coincided with debates within many digital newsrooms. Should the ideals journalists adopted in the 20th century be preserved in a digital news landscape? Or must today’s news workers forge new relationships with their publics and find alternatives to traditional notions of journalistic objectivity, fairness, and balance? Despite the centrality of these questions to digital newsrooms, little research on “innovation in journalism” or the “future of news” has explicitly addressed how digital journalists and editors in partisan news organizations are rethinking norms.
  • The Big List of Who Hates Guns » Print

    The Big List of Who Hates Guns » Print

    The Daily Caller » The Big List of Who Hates Guns » Print http://dailycaller.com/2012/03/01/the-big-list-of-who-hates-guns/?print=1 - The Daily Caller - http://dailycaller.com - The Big List of Who Hates Guns Posted By Mike Piccione On 2:25 PM 03/01/2012 @ 2:25 PM In Featured,Gun Laws & Legislation,Guns and Gear | 6 Comments I was cruising the web reading gun articles and then I started wondering about writing an article on anti-gun organizations and people. Since anti-gunners are always saying “no one wants to take your guns away” or they want me to live under their take of “sensible gun laws” (neither of which I believe to be prudent, sensible or anything remotely truthful) I figured I would go to the NRA’s Institute of Legislative Action to find out who are the people that want to be sure that I can’t defend my home or go shooting my .22 in the woods (both heinous acts of human behavior to be sure). So, hats off the the NRA-ILA team for compiling this list. Here is what the NRA-ILA team had to say. The following organizations have lent monetary, grassroots or some other type of direct support to anti-gun organizations. In many instances, these organizations lent their name in support of specific campaigns to pass anti-gun legislation such as the March 1995 HCI “Campaign to Protect Sane Gun Laws.” Many of these organizations were listed as “Campaign Partners,” for having pledged to fight any efforts to repeal the Brady Act and the Clinton “assault weapons” ban.
  • Talk Radio Hits the Airwaves in Iowa, Talking About Immigration As The

    Talk Radio Hits the Airwaves in Iowa, Talking About Immigration As The

    Talk Radio Hits the Airwaves in Iowa, Talking About Immigration As the year drew to a close, talk radio once again became the focal point of the national debate about immigration policy, as the nation’s political attention was focused on Iowa. Twenty-two talk radio hosts from Iowa and around the nation came to Des Moines to discuss immigration in advance of the first-in-the-nation presidential caucuses, held on January 3. See page 3 FAIR Cost Study Reveals Why Immigration Is a Top Concern in Iowa Many in the national media expressed surprise that immigration was at the top of the list of concerns among Iowa voters. However, a new report, The Costs of Illegal Immigration to Iowans, released by FAIR in late December, demonstrates why people in Iowa, like others around the nation, are growing increasingly alarmed about the failures of our nation’s immigration policies. See page 4 Illegal Alien Advocacy Network Tries, and Fails, to Keep Iowa 2007 Talk Radio Row Off the Air When the pro-amnesty lobby learned about Iowa 2007 Talk Radio Row, and the release of a new FAIR report on the costs of illegal immigration in Iowa, a well-funded coalition of organizations mounted a smear campaign aimed at preventing the event from taking place. See page 5 Live from Iowa 2007, Talk Radio Row Iowa 2007 Talk Radio Row was conceived as a forum for people in Iowa and all across the country to hear America’s leaders discuss their vision of U.S. immigration policy. National and local leaders were invited to appear on any or all of the talk shows broadcasting from Radio Row.
  • The Tea Party Movement and Popular Constitutionalism

    The Tea Party Movement and Popular Constitutionalism

    Copyright 2011 by Northwestern University School of Law Vol. 105 Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy THE TEA PARTY MOVEMENT AND POPULAR CONSTITUTIONALISM Ilya Somin* INTRODUCTION The rise of the Tea Party movement followed a period during which many academic students of constitutional law focused on ―popular constitu- tionalism‖: the involvement of public opinion and popular movements in influencing constitutional interpretation.1 Many of these scholars argue that popular constitutional movements have a beneficial impact on constitution- al law,2 and some even contend that popular constitutionalism should sup- plant judicial review entirely.3 At the very least, the last generation of constitutional scholarship has established that public opinion influences and significantly constrains judicial interpretation of the Constitution.4 Most of the previous scholarship on popular constitutionalism focuses on movements identified with the political left, such as the civil rights *Associate Professor of Law, George Mason University School of Law. For helpful suggestions and comments, I would like to thank Jonathan Adler, Jared Goldstein, participants in the 2011 AALS panel on the Tea Party and the Constitution, and the editors of the Northwestern University Law Review Col- loquy. I would also like to thank Eva Choi and Eric Facer for helpful research assistance. 1 See, e.g., LARRY D. KRAMER, THE PEOPLE THEMSELVES: POPULAR CONSTITUTIONALISM AND JUDICIAL REVIEW (2004); MARK TUSHNET, TAKING THE CONSTITUTION AWAY FROM THE COURTS (1999); JEREMY WALDRON, LAW AND DISAGREEMENT (1999); Matthew D. Adler, Popular Constitutio- nalism and the Rule of Recognition: Whose Practices Ground U.S. Law?, 100 NW. U. L. REV. 719 (2006) (link); Larry Alexander & Lawrence B.