DOCSLIB.ORG

Plant Invasiveness Assessment System For

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Plant Invasiveness Assessment System For WEED RISK ASSESSMENT FORM Botanical name: Fallopia convolvulus (Linnaeus) Á. Löve (Polygonum convolvulus L.) Common name: black bindweed Assessors: Irina Lapina Matthew L. Carlson, Ph.D. Botanist, Alaska Natural Heritage Assistant Professor, Alaska Natural Heritage Program, University of Alaska Program, University of Alaska Anchorage, Anchorage, 707 A Street, 707 A Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501 Anchorage, Alaska 99501 tel: (907) 257-2710; fax (907) 257-2789 tel: (907) 257-2790; fax (907) 257-2789 Reviewers: Michael Shephard Jeff Heys Vegetation Ecologist Forest Health Exotic Plant Management Program Protection State & Private Forestry, 3301 Coordinator, National Park Service, Alaska C Street, Suite 202, Anchorage, AK Region - Biological Resources Team, 240 W. 99503; tel: (907) 743-9454; fax 907 743- 5th Ave, #114, Anchorage, AK 99501 tel: 9479 (907)644-3451, fax: 644-3809 Jeff Conn, Ph.D. Erin Uloth Weed Scientist, USDA Agricultural Forest Health Protection State and Private Research Service PO Box 757200 Forestry, 3301 C Street Suite 202 Anchorage, Fairbanks, Alaska 99775 tel: (907) 474- AK 99503 7652; fax (907) 474-6184 tel: (907) 743-9459, fax (907) 743-9479 Outcome score: A. Climatic Comparison This species is present or may potentially establish in the following eco-geographic regions: 1 South Coastal Yes 2 Interior-Boreal Yes 3 Arctic-Alpine Yes B. Invasiveness Ranking Total (Total Answered*) Total Possible 1 Ecological impact 40 (40) 12 2 Biological characteristic and dispersal ability 25 (25) 16 3 Ecological amplitude and distribution 25 (25) 17 4 Feasibility of control 10 (10) 5 Outcome score 100 (100)b 50 a Relative maximum score† 0.50 * For questions answered “unknown” do not include point value for the question in parentheses for “Total Answered Points Possible.” a b † Calculated as / . A. CLIMATIC COMPARISON: South Coastal 1.1. Has this species ever been collected or Interior- Boreal documented in Alaska? Arctic-Alpine Yes Yes – continue to 1.2 No – continue to 2.1 Collection Site 1.2. Which eco-geographic region has it been collected or documented (see inset map)? Proceed to Section B. Invasiveness Ranking. Yes South Coastal Yes Interior-Boreal Yes Arctic-Alpine Documentation: Fallopia convolvulus has been documented in all ecogeographic regions of Alaska (Weeds of Alaska Database 2005, Hultén 1968, UAM 2004, Welsh 1974). Sources of information: Hultén, E. 1968. Flora of Alaska and Neighboring Territories. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA. 1008 p. 1 University of Alaska Museum. University of Alaska Fairbanks. 2004. http://hispida.museum.uaf.edu:8080/home.cfm Weeds of Alaska Database. 2005. Database of exotic vegetation collected in Alaska. University of Alaska, Alaska Natural Heritage Program – US Forest Service – National Park Service Database. Available: http://akweeds.uaa.alaska.edu/ Welsh, S.L. 1974. Anderson’s flora of Alaska and adjacent parts of Canada. Brigham University Press. 724 pp. 2.1. Is there a 40% or higher similarity (based on CLIMEX climate matching) between climates any where the species currently occurs and a. Juneau (South Coastal Region)? Yes – record locations and similarity; proceed to Section B. Invasiveness Ranking No b. Fairbanks (Interior-Boreal)? Yes – record locations and similarity; proceed to Section B. Invasiveness Ranking No c. Nome (Arctic-Alpine)? Yes – record locations and similarity; proceed to Section B. Invasiveness Ranking No – If “No” is answered for all regions, reject species from consideration Documentation: Sources of information: B. INVASIVENESS RANKING 1. ECOLOGICAL IMPACT 1.1. Impact on Natural Ecosystem Processes A. No perceivable impact on ecosystem processes 0 B. Influences ecosystem processes to a minor degree (e.g., has a perceivable but mild 3 influence on soil nutrient availability) C. Significant alteration of ecosystem processes (e.g., increases sedimentation rates along 7 streams or coastlines, reduces open water that are important to waterfowl) D. Major, possibly irreversible, alteration or disruption of ecosystem processes (e.g., the 10 species alters geomorphology; hydrology; or affects fire frequency, altering community composition; species fixes substantial levels of nitrogen in the soil making soil unlikely to support certain native plants or more likely to favor non-native species) U. Unknown Score 3 Documentation: Identify ecosystem processes impacted: Black bindweed quickly covers bare soil (Hume et al. 1983, Rutledge and McLendon 1996). It may prevent native species from establishment. Rational: Sources of information: Hume, L., J. Martinez and K. Best. 1983. The biology of Canadian weeds. 60. Polygonum convolvulus L. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 63: 959-971. Rutledge, C.R. and T. McLendon. 1996. An Assessment of Exotic Plant Species of Rocky Mountain National Park. Department of Rangeland Ecosystem Science, Colorado State University. 97 pp. Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center Home Page. http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/othrdata/Explant/explant.htm (Version 15DEC98). 1.2. Impact on Natural Community Structure 2 A. No perceived impact; establishes in an existing layer without influencing its structure 0 B. Influences structure in one layer (e.g., changes the density of one layer) 3 C. Significant impact in at least one layer (e.g., creation of a new layer or elimination of 7 an existing layer) D. Major alteration of structure (e.g., covers canopy, eradicating most or all layers below) 10 U. Unknown Score 3 Documentation: Identify type of impact or alteration: Black bindweed is able to create dense canopy, covering herbaceous plants (Friesen and Shebeski 1960, Royer and Dickinson 1999). However, dense stands of black bindweed have not been observed in native communities in Alaska (J. Conn – pers. obs.). Rational: Sources of information: Conn, J., Weed Scientist, USDA Agricultural Research Service PO Box 757200 Fairbanks, Alaska 99775 tel: (907) 474-7652; fax (907) 474-6184. – Pers. com. Friesen, G. and L.H. Shebeski. 1960. Economic losses caused by weed competition in Manitoba grain fields. I. Weed species, their relative abundance and their effect on crop yields. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 40:457-467. Royer, F. and R. Dickinson. 1999. Weeds of the Northern U.S. and Canada. The University of Alberta press. 434 pp. 1.3. Impact on Natural Community Composition A. No perceived impact; causes no apparent change in native populations 0 B. Influences community composition (e.g., reduces the number of individuals in one or 3 more native species in the community) C. Significantly alters community composition (e.g., produces a significant reduction in 7 the population size of one or more native species in the community) D. Causes major alteration in community composition (e.g., results in the extirpation of 10 one or several native species, reducing biodiversity or change the community composition towards species exotic to the natural community) U. Unknown Score 3 Documentation: Identify type of impact or alteration: Black bindweed is a strong competitor (Fabricius and Nalewaja 1968, Friesen and Shebeski 1960, Pavlychenko and Harrington 1934, Welbank 1963) and it likely will reduce the number of individuals in native species community. Rational: Sources of information: Fabricius, L.J. and J.D. Nalewaja. 1968. Competition between wheat and wild buckwheat. Weed Science 16: 204-208. Friesen, G. and L.H. Shebeski. 1960. Economic losses caused by weed competition in Manitoba grain fields. I. Weed species, their relative abundance and their effect on crop yields. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 40:457-467. Pavlychenko, T.K. and J.B. Harrington. 1934. Competitive efficiency of weeds and cereal crops. Canadian Journal of Research 10:77-93. Welbank, P.J. 1963. A comparison of competitive effects of some common weed species. Annals of Applied Biology 51:107-125. 1.4. Impact on higher trophic levels (cumulative impact of this species on the animals, fungi, microbes, and other organisms in the community it invades) A. Negligible perceived impact 0 B. Minor alteration 3 C. Moderate alteration (minor reduction in nesting/foraging sites, reduction in habitat 7 connectivity, interference with native pollinators, injurious components such as spines, 3 toxins) D. Severe alteration of higher trophic populations (extirpation or endangerment of an 10 existing native species/population, or significant reduction in nesting or foraging sites) U. Unknown Score 3 Documentation: Identify type of impact or alteration: The seeds and leaves of black bindweed is important food for granivorous birds (Wilson et al. 1999). It is also an alternate host for number of fungi, viruses, and nematode species (Cooper and Harrison 1973, Royer and Dickinson 1999, Townshend and Davidson 1962) Rational: Sources of information: Cooper, J.I. and B.D. Harrison. 1973. The role of weed hosts and the distribution and activity of vector nematodes in the ecology of tobacco rattle virus. Annals of Applied Biology 73: 53-66. Royer, F. and R. Dickinson. 1999. Weeds of the Northern U.S. and Canada. The University of Alberta press. 434 pp. Townshend, J.L. and T.R. Davidson. 1962. Some weed hosts of the northern root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne hapla Chitwood, 1949, in Ontario. Canadian Journal of Botany 40: 543-548. Wilson, J.D., A.J. Morris, B.E. Arroyo, S.C. Clark and R.B. Bradbury. 1999. A review of the abundance and diversity of invertebrate and plant foods of granivorous birds in northern Europe in relation to agricultural change. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
Load more

Recommended publications
  • State of New York City's Plants 2018
    STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Bindweed (Convolvulus Arvensis): “All ” Tied Up
    Weed Technology Field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis): “all ” www.cambridge.org/wet tied up Lynn M. Sosnoskie1 , Bradley D. Hanson2 and Lawrence E. Steckel3 1 2 Intriguing World of Weeds Assistant Professor, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Geneva, NY USA; Cooperative Extension Specialist, Department of Plant Science, University of California – Davis, Davis, CA, USA and 3 Cite this article: Sosnoskie LM, Hanson BD, Professor, Department of Plant Sciences, University of Tennessee, Jackson, TN, USA Steckel LE (2020) Field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis): “all tied up”. Weed Technol. 34: 916–921. doi: 10.1017/wet.2020.61 Received: 22 March 2020 Revised: 2 June 2020 But your snobbiness, unless you persistently root it out like the bindweed it is, sticks by you till your Accepted: 4 June 2020 grave. – George Orwell First published online: 16 July 2020 The real danger in a garden came from the bindweed. That moved underground, then surfaced and took hold. Associate Editor: Strangling plant after healthy plant. Killing them all, slowly. And for no apparent reason, except that it was Jason Bond, Mississippi State University nature. – Louise Penny Author for correspondence: Lynn M. Sosnoskie, Cornell University, 635 W. Introduction North Avenue, Geneva, NY 14456. (Email: [email protected]) Field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis L.) is a perennial vine in the Convolvulaceae, or morning- glory family, which includes approximately 50 to 60 genera and more than 1,500 species (Preston 2012a; Stefanovic et al. 2003). The family is in the order Solanales and is characterized by alternate leaves (when present) and bisexual flowers that are 5-lobed, folded/pleated in the bud, and trumpet-shaped when emerged (Preston 2012a; Stefanovic et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 2: Plant Lists
    Appendix 2: Plant Lists Master List and Section Lists Mahlon Dickerson Reservation Botanical Survey and Stewardship Assessment Wild Ridge Plants, LLC 2015 2015 MASTER PLANT LIST MAHLON DICKERSON RESERVATION SCIENTIFIC NAME NATIVENESS S-RANK CC PLANT HABIT # OF SECTIONS Acalypha rhomboidea Native 1 Forb 9 Acer palmatum Invasive 0 Tree 1 Acer pensylvanicum Native 7 Tree 2 Acer platanoides Invasive 0 Tree 4 Acer rubrum Native 3 Tree 27 Acer saccharum Native 5 Tree 24 Achillea millefolium Native 0 Forb 18 Acorus calamus Alien 0 Forb 1 Actaea pachypoda Native 5 Forb 10 Adiantum pedatum Native 7 Fern 7 Ageratina altissima v. altissima Native 3 Forb 23 Agrimonia gryposepala Native 4 Forb 4 Agrostis canina Alien 0 Graminoid 2 Agrostis gigantea Alien 0 Graminoid 8 Agrostis hyemalis Native 2 Graminoid 3 Agrostis perennans Native 5 Graminoid 18 Agrostis stolonifera Invasive 0 Graminoid 3 Ailanthus altissima Invasive 0 Tree 8 Ajuga reptans Invasive 0 Forb 3 Alisma subcordatum Native 3 Forb 3 Alliaria petiolata Invasive 0 Forb 17 Allium tricoccum Native 8 Forb 3 Allium vineale Alien 0 Forb 2 Alnus incana ssp rugosa Native 6 Shrub 5 Alnus serrulata Native 4 Shrub 3 Ambrosia artemisiifolia Native 0 Forb 14 Amelanchier arborea Native 7 Tree 26 Amphicarpaea bracteata Native 4 Vine, herbaceous 18 2015 MASTER PLANT LIST MAHLON DICKERSON RESERVATION SCIENTIFIC NAME NATIVENESS S-RANK CC PLANT HABIT # OF SECTIONS Anagallis arvensis Alien 0 Forb 4 Anaphalis margaritacea Native 2 Forb 3 Andropogon gerardii Native 4 Graminoid 1 Andropogon virginicus Native 2 Graminoid 1 Anemone americana Native 9 Forb 6 Anemone quinquefolia Native 7 Forb 13 Anemone virginiana Native 4 Forb 5 Antennaria neglecta Native 2 Forb 2 Antennaria neodioica ssp.
    [Show full text]
  • Polygonaceae of Alberta
    AN ILLUSTRATED KEY TO THE POLYGONACEAE OF ALBERTA Compiled and writen by Lorna Allen & Linda Kershaw April 2019 © Linda J. Kershaw & Lorna Allen This key was compiled using informaton primarily from Moss (1983), Douglas et. al. (1999) and the Flora North America Associaton (2005). Taxonomy follows VAS- CAN (Brouillet, 2015). The main references are listed at the end of the key. Please let us know if there are ways in which the kay can be improved. The 2015 S-ranks of rare species (S1; S1S2; S2; S2S3; SU, according to ACIMS, 2015) are noted in superscript (S1;S2;SU) afer the species names. For more details go to the ACIMS web site. Similarly, exotc species are followed by a superscript X, XX if noxious and XXX if prohibited noxious (X; XX; XXX) according to the Alberta Weed Control Act (2016). POLYGONACEAE Buckwheat Family 1a Key to Genera 01a Dwarf annual plants 1-4(10) cm tall; leaves paired or nearly so; tepals 3(4); stamens (1)3(5) .............Koenigia islandica S2 01b Plants not as above; tepals 4-5; stamens 3-8 ..................................02 02a Plants large, exotic, perennial herbs spreading by creeping rootstocks; fowering stems erect, hollow, 0.5-2(3) m tall; fowers with both ♂ and ♀ parts ............................03 02b Plants smaller, native or exotic, perennial or annual herbs, with or without creeping rootstocks; fowering stems usually <1 m tall; fowers either ♂ or ♀ (unisexual) or with both ♂ and ♀ parts .......................04 3a 03a Flowering stems forming dense colonies and with distinct joints (like bamboo
    [Show full text]
  • Floristic Quality Assessment Report
    FLORISTIC QUALITY ASSESSMENT IN INDIANA: THE CONCEPT, USE, AND DEVELOPMENT OF COEFFICIENTS OF CONSERVATISM Tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) the State tree of Indiana June 2004 Final Report for ARN A305-4-53 EPA Wetland Program Development Grant CD975586-01 Prepared by: Paul E. Rothrock, Ph.D. Taylor University Upland, IN 46989-1001 Introduction Since the early nineteenth century the Indiana landscape has undergone a massive transformation (Jackson 1997). In the pre-settlement period, Indiana was an almost unbroken blanket of forests, prairies, and wetlands. Much of the land was cleared, plowed, or drained for lumber, the raising of crops, and a range of urban and industrial activities. Indiana’s native biota is now restricted to relatively small and often isolated tracts across the State. This fragmentation and reduction of the State’s biological diversity has challenged Hoosiers to look carefully at how to monitor further changes within our remnant natural communities and how to effectively conserve and even restore many of these valuable places within our State. To meet this monitoring, conservation, and restoration challenge, one needs to develop a variety of appropriate analytical tools. Ideally these techniques should be simple to learn and apply, give consistent results between different observers, and be repeatable. Floristic Assessment, which includes metrics such as the Floristic Quality Index (FQI) and Mean C values, has gained wide acceptance among environmental scientists and decision-makers, land stewards, and restoration ecologists in Indiana’s neighboring states and regions: Illinois (Taft et al. 1997), Michigan (Herman et al. 1996), Missouri (Ladd 1996), and Wisconsin (Bernthal 2003) as well as northern Ohio (Andreas 1993) and southern Ontario (Oldham et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team Biological Control of Invasive
    Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Biological Control Biological Control of Invasive Plants in the Eastern United States Roy Van Driesche Bernd Blossey Mark Hoddle Suzanne Lyon Richard Reardon Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team—Morgantown, West Virginia United States Forest FHTET-2002-04 Department of Service August 2002 Agriculture BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF INVASIVE PLANTS IN THE EASTERN UNITED STATES BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF INVASIVE PLANTS IN THE EASTERN UNITED STATES Technical Coordinators Roy Van Driesche and Suzanne Lyon Department of Entomology, University of Massachusets, Amherst, MA Bernd Blossey Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY Mark Hoddle Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA Richard Reardon Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, USDA, Forest Service, Morgantown, WV USDA Forest Service Publication FHTET-2002-04 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank the authors of the individual chap- We would also like to thank the U.S. Depart- ters for their expertise in reviewing and summariz- ment of Agriculture–Forest Service, Forest Health ing the literature and providing current information Technology Enterprise Team, Morgantown, West on biological control of the major invasive plants in Virginia, for providing funding for the preparation the Eastern United States. and printing of this publication. G. Keith Douce, David Moorhead, and Charles Additional copies of this publication can be or- Bargeron of the Bugwood Network, University of dered from the Bulletin Distribution Center, Uni- Georgia (Tifton, Ga.), managed and digitized the pho- versity of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, (413) tographs and illustrations used in this publication and 545-2717; or Mark Hoddle, Department of Entomol- produced the CD-ROM accompanying this book.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian-Vine
    www.nonnativespecies.org Produced by Alison Jukes, Vicky Ames, Max Wade and Kelly McKee of RPS Russian-vine Species Description Scientific name: Fallopia baldschuanica AKA: Clymog Rwsia (Welsh), Polygonum aubertii Native to: Central Asia Habitat: Trees, scrub, hedges and neglected buildings A climbing perennial scrambling for many metres over other vegetation and structures, such as trees, fencing and buildings. Its vine-like stems grow to be thick and woody at the base becoming thinner and twining further up the plant. The woody stem and clusters of small white flowers readily distinguish this creeper from others found in the wild in the UK. Introduced into gardens in the UK towards the end of the 19th Century. It was first recorded in the wild in 1936 and is increasing due to its continued use in gardens and for landscaping, e.g. screening, and from the discarding of surplus garden material onto roadsides and rubbish tips. It is rarely naturalised away from habitation. This plant is very fast growing and can spread quickly. It can cover native trees and shrubs and reduce biodiversity by shading out other species. For details of legislation go to www.nonnativespecies.org/legislation. Key ID Features Fruit small (4-5 mm), shiny Leaves triangular with White flowers, heart-shaped bases, 3 5 mm across -6 cm long Woody stem Twining stems wrap around supporting structures instead of using tendrils Identification throughout the year Distribution Russian-vine is easiest to identify when it is flowering, between July and Scattered in lowland England and Wales, October. Its woody lower stem distinguishes it at all times of the year from rarely occurring away from habitation but all other climbing species with the exception of Traveller’s-joy ( Clematis increasing in distribution.
    [Show full text]
  • Invasive Polygonaceae.Indd
    Family Polygonaceae Family: Polygonaceae Japanese Knotweed Polygonum cuspidatum Sieb. & Zucc. Alternate Names Japanese bamboo, fleeceflower, Mexican bamboo Synonyms Fallopia japonica (Houtt) Dcne; Plueropterus cuspidatum (Sieb. & Zucc.) Moldenke; Plueropterus zuccarinii (Small) Small; Polygonum zuccarinii Small; Reynourtia japonica Houtt Related Species Polygonum sachalinense F. Schmidt ex Maxim Bohemian Knotweed Polygonum x bohemicum (J. Chrtek & A. Chrtkova) P.F. Zika & A.L. Jacobson Old XID Services photo by Richard Description Japanese knotweed stems grow up to 10 feet tall and are hollow and bamboo-like, with thickened nodes where the leaf stalks Japanese knotweed flowers. meet the stem. Nodes are surrounded by thin papery sheaths, and stems are angled slightly at each node. Leaves are broadly oval, satiny-textured, and up to 6 inches long with short stalks. Inflorescences are branched sprays of small white to greenish-white flow- ers in late summer. Giant knotweed has very large leaves, up to 18 inches long. To differentiate the species, look at leaves from the middle of a shoot, not the shoot tip leaves, which are highly variable. Leaves of Japanese knotweed are flat-based, with an acutely tapering tip, whereas leaves of giant knotweed have a deeply notched base with a more gradually tapering tip, and leaves of bohemian knotweed are intermediate between the other 2 species. Hairs on the Family: Polygonaceae Japanese Knotweed midvein on the underside of the leaf are also diagnostic. To observe, use a 10X lens to view a backlit leaf bent over a finger. Hairs of giant knotweed are multicellular, kinky, and long, whereas hairs of bohemian knotweed are shorter and unicellular with a broad base, and hairs of Japanese knotweed are reduced to bumps.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Kansas Invasive Plant Species List
    KANSAS Invasive Plant Species List – 2017 Regional Condition 2 Plants – 466 Species Common Name Scientific Name # of Counties absinth wormwood Artemisia absinthium 1 African mustard Strigosella africana 1 alfalfa Medicago sativa 105 alligatorweed Alternanthera philoxeroides 1 alsike clover Trifolium hybridum 18 American burnweed Erechtites hieraciifolius 42 Amur honeysuckle Lonicera maackii 14 annual bluegrass Poa annua 45 annual sowthistle Sonchus oleraceus 10 annual wormwood Artemisia annua 4 apple-of-Peru Nicandra physalodes 3 Asiatic dayflower Commelina communis 20 autumn olive Elaeagnus umbellata 3 babysbreath Gypsophila paniculata 1 bald brome Bromus racemosus 29 balloonvine Cardiospermum halicacabum 9 balsamapple Momordica charantia 1 barley Hordeum vulgare 1 barnyardgrass Echinochloa crus-galli 90 bermudagrass Cynodon dactylon 78 biennial wormwood Artemisia biennis 13 big chickweed Cerastium fontanum ssp. vulgare 34 bigpod sesbania Sesbania herbacea 4 bigroot morning-glory Ipomoea pandurata 30 birdsfoot trefoil Lotus corniculatus 10 birdsrape mustard Brassica rapa 26 bittersweet nightshade Solanum dulcamara 1 bittersweets Celastrus spp. 62 Black dog-strangling vine, black swallowwort Vincetoxicum nigrum 4 black medic Medicago lupulina 98 black mustard Brassica nigra 37 bladder campion Silene latifolia ssp. alba 4 bladder campion Silene vulgaris 3 bladder senna Colutea arborescens 1 blue lettuce Lactuca tatarica 31 blue mustard Chorispora tenella 55 border privet Ligustrum obtusifolium 4 bouncingbet Saponaria officinalis 50 Brazilian
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Study of Achene Morphology in Korean Polygonaceae 2
    Bangladesh J. Plant Taxon. 25(2): 135-148, 2018 (December) © 2018 Bangladesh Association of Plant Taxonomists A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ACHENE MORPHOLOGY IN KOREAN POLYGONACEAE 1 2 MIN-JUNG KONG, JUN-HO SONG , BEOM-CHEOL AN, SUNG-WON SON , 2 2 3 GANG-UK SUH , MI-JIN CHUNG AND SUK-PYO HONG Laboratory of Plant Systematics, Department of Biology, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, South Korea Keywords: Achene surface; Fruit morphology; Micromorphology; Polygonoideae; SEM. Abstract A comparative macro- and micromorphological study was conducted on achenes of Korean Polygonaceae comprising 45 taxa under 10 genera using a Stereo-microscope (SM) and Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) to evaluate the taxonomical relevance of achene morphological characteristics. The achene shape is lenticular, biconvex, trigonous, or spheroidal. The largest achenes are found in Fagopyrum esculentum Moench (5.80– 6.70 × 3.90–4.40 mm) and Rheum rhabarbarum L. (5.00–6.50 × 4.00–5.20 mm), and the smallest is found in Rumex maritimus L. (1.17–1.41 × 0.60–0.84 mm). Three types of embryo shape (curved, straight, and folded) and two types of embryo position (plane and parietal) can be distinguished. Most taxa have a curved embryo shape with plane position. Four types of surface patterns (smooth, papillae, tuberculate, or small pits) are observed. The surface sculpture or embryo type is rather consistent at the generic or tribal level, and the comprehensive consideration of achene characteristics is also useful at the species level. The achene morphology is described in detail, compared, and illustrated. The taxonomic significance of the achene morphology is discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Nombre Científico: Polygonum Convolvulus L
    Ficha Técnica Polygonum convolvulus Nombre Científico: Polygonum convolvulus L. Sinonimias: Fallopia convolvulus (L.) Á. Löve Fagopyrum convolvulus (L.) H. Gross Tiniaria convolvulus (L.) Webb. & Moq. Bilderdykia convolvulus (L.) Dumort. Nombres comúnes: chilillo, poligono trepador, corregüela anual Common Name: black bindweed, climbing bindweed, wild buckwheat. (CABI, 2010) A. Introducción A. 2 Descripción morfológica Polygonum convolvulus es una maleza muy competitiva P. convolvulus es una maleza anual trepadora que en la obtención de recursos agrícolas y programación puede llegar a 1 m ó mas de altura con raíces que de manejo en varios cultivos en países donde se pueden alcanzar hasta los 80 cm de profundidad, distribuye, principalmente en cereales, aunque también siendo éstas muy ramificadas (Marzocca, 1979). El tallo puede ocasionar pérdidas en rendimiento en el cultivo es delgado, liso a ligeramente rugoso, en su base esta de la papa, en viñedos, así como en hortalizas y en libre de ramas, de color verde a verde olivo, midiendo frutales. Afecta a más de 25 cultivos en 41 países y en de 5 cm a 2 m de longitud, con entrenudos largos 20 de estos cultivos se cataloga como una maleza de (Hume et al., 1983). Esta maleza se desarrolla de gran importancia (CABI, 2010 y Holm et al., 1991). P. manera rastrera o rodeando a su hospedero (Figura 1) convolvulus es poliploide y tiene un numero (CABI, 2010; Marzocca, 1979). cromosómico de 2n = 40 (CABI, 2010). A. 1 Posición taxonómica El género Polygonum L. (Polygonaceae) agrupa a 200 especies de difícil identificación, distribuidas ampliamente en el mundo, fue descrito sensu lato (en sentido amplio) por Linneo, por lo que posteriores autores dividen el mismo en varios géneros (CABI, 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Native Plants of Delaware
    NON-NATIVE PLANTS OF DELAWARE William A. McAvoy Species Conservation and Research Program Delaware Division of Fish and Wildlife Delaware Dept. of Natural Resources and Environmental Control 6180 Hay Point Landing Rd., Smyrna, DE 19977 [email protected] January 2021 This list consists of 720 species, subspecies and varieties (taxa) of non-native, vascular plants that occur in Delaware. The list includes 75 taxa that are invasive in Delaware, 72 that are invasive watchlist taxa, 134 that are non- indigenous, and 149 that are thought to be waifs in the state. This list is updated bi-annually as new data are collected and the ranks of species are assessed. The non-native flora of Delaware represents 45% of the state’s overall flora (there are 1613 native taxa). The list is arranged alphabetically by scientific name (nomenclature follows McAvoy, W.A. 2021. The Flora of Delaware Online Database. Delaware Division of Fish and Wildlife, Species Conservation and Research Program, Smyrna, Delaware). Life Form (e.g., fern, tree, shrub) and Duration (annual, perennial, biennial) are provided for each taxon listed. The purpose of this list is not regulatory; it is to serve only as a reference, advising those who have an interest in and concerns about non-native plants in Delaware. Invasive: A non-native species that causes environmental harm. Invasive species are very aggressive and can out- compete and displace native flora and fauna. Non-indigenous (identified with an asterisk *): A species native to North America, but not to Delaware that is now found growing in Delaware outside of its natural range.
    [Show full text]