DOCSLIB.ORG

2011-12 CA Winter SNPL Survey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

2011-12 CA winter SNPL Survey SITE OWNER 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 Del Norte Smith River Private, CDPR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lake Earl/Talawa CDFG, CDPR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Crescent Beach Crescent City 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 County Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Humboldt South Gold Bluffs Beach USNPS, CDPR 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 4 North Gold Bluffs Beach USNPS, CDPR 2 3 5 1 2 4 3 4 4 0 Freshwater Lagoon USNPS5, CDPR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Stone Lagoon CDPR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dry Lagoon CDPR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Big Lagoon CDPR 0 0 10 0 6 4 2 3 3 7 Moonstone Beach County 0 0 0 - 0 Little River, Clam Beach North County, CDPR, Private 45 31 52 22 41 30 29 39 33 53 Clam Beach South County 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanphere to Mad River County, Private 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Gun Club to Lanphere BLM/USFWS4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Power Pole to Gun Club BLM, Private 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 North Spit BLM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Elk River Spit City of Eureka 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eel River Gravel Bars County,CA State 0 0 0 0 South Spit BLM 8 5 1 22 9 7 0 8 1 7 Eel River WA, North CDFG 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eel River WA, South CDFG 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Centerville Beach County, Private 38 1 42 5 40 2 0 0 0 31 McNult Gulch Private - - Mattole River BLM3 0 0 0 0 0 County Total 93 40 110 75 98 47 34 54 41 102 Mendocino MacKerricher SB, 10 Mile CDPR 42 33 41 23 19 33 41 27 53 41 Virgin Creek CDPR 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 Manchester SB, Alder & Brush Creeks. CDPR 12 14 12 24 0 6 1 7 10 0 Manchester SB, Brush C. to Garcia R. CDPR, BLM 0 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 7 County Total 62 47 53 47 21 39 42 40 63 48 Total Unit 2 155 87 163 122 119 86 76 94 104 150 2011-12 CA winter SNPL Survey SITE OWNER 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 San Francisco Bay Alameda Baumberg/Eden Landing CDFG 3 16 0 39 118 47 0 156 151 209 Coyote Hills USFWS NWR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dumbarton USFWS NWR 0 26 44 7 1 0 13 0 2 0 Hayward City of Hayward 55 0 0 3 0 0 23 1 0 Warm Springs USFWS NWR 0 28 12 9 0 24 74 53 29 0 Napa Napa CDFG 1 57 0 4 0 5 San Mateo Ravenswood/West Bay USFWS NWR 220 1 4 9 0 3 18 13 11 23 Santa Clara Alviso USFWS NWR 2 0 5 22 0 0 0 15 37 0 Total Unit 3 281 71 65 89 119 131 128 242 230 237 Sonoma Salmon Creek SB CDPR 0 18 14 17 42 16 19 8 4 10 Doran County Park COUNTY 0 0 15 35 0 32 0 27 23 0 County Total 0 18 29 52 42 48 19 35 27 10 Marin Dillon Beach Private 123 110 116 75 82 59 86 94 1 88 Kehoe Beach USNPS 55 28 62 64 46 32 54 29 16 32 North Beach USNPS 43 0 20 28 7 44 24 11 9 6 South Beach USNPS 2 2 1 0 0 4 1 0 Lighthouse Beach USNPS 0 0 0 0 Drakes Beach USNPS 0 0 1 0 0 Limantour Spit USNPS 95 0 130 98 56 90 64 93 72 105 Bolinas Lagoon COUNTY 0 11 8 20 19 12 8 13 15 13 County Total 316 151 339 286 210 237 240 241 113 244 San Francisco Ocean Beach COUNTY 30 25 24 31 33 16 21 21 14 17 Crissy Field USNPS 4 3 5 0 7 4 0 County Total 30 25 24 35 36 21 21 28 18 17 2011-12 CA winter SNPL Survey SITE OWNER 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 San Mateo Rockaway Beach 1 0 Pacifica SB CDPR 33 21 18 20 0 15 15 9 11 7 Pillar Point ? 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 Half Moon Bay State Beach CDPR 65 0 58 50 60 48 27 48 28 37 Tunitas Creek Private 34 0 35 32 0 24 0 10 25 23 San Gregorio CDPR 0 75 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 Pomponio CDPR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pescadero SB CDPR 0 0 0 0 3 0 8 6 5 9 Pigeon Point CDPR, Private 6 12 0 0 5 9 9 8 10 Gazos Creek CDPR 31 15 5 20 0 17 0 14 17 26 Ano Nuevo CDPR 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 County Total 163 119 128 122 63 109 59 98 98 112 Santa Cruz Waddell SB CDPR, Private 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scott Creek Beach County 62 63 96 93 129 40 116 53 56 26 Laguna Creek CDPR 59 55 11 35 0 0 0 37 25 34 Wilder SB CDPR 1 26 9 8 0 0 0 4 0 Seabright SB CDPR 58 0 68 60 53 50 87 104 73 83 Sunset SB CDPR 0 65 63 3 0 13 0 23 32 41 Pajaro Beach and Spit CDPR 5 1 68 105 1 5 4 99 76 27 County Total 185 210 315 304 183 108 207 316 266 211 Monterey Zmudowski SB CDPR 1 0 0 0 22 47 28 1 8 90 Moss Landing SB CDPR 1 44 2 25 0 4 36 12 29 25 Moss Landing Salt Ponds CDFG 59 NS 137 0 35 4 0 0 Salinas SB CDPR 363 86 78 53 14 32 0 43 34 14 Salinas River NWR USFWS 0 2 28 34 0 6 0 0 22 30 Martin/Lone Star Areas Private 0 48 21 22 8 10 0 0 8 7 Marina SB (Reservation Rd & Fort Ord) CDPR 91 0 0 0 0 0 12 24 0 Sand City Private 28 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monterey SB CDPR 0 0 0 55 0 0 53 26 25 12 Carmel River SB CDPR 0 0 0 32 40 34 35 0 28 31 Asilomar CDPR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Point Sur Beach CDPR 1 7 1 0 0 1 0 21 0 0 2011-12 CA winter SNPL Survey SITE OWNER 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 Little Sur Beach Private 0 0 0 County Total 366 306 217 221 221 134 187 119 178 209 Total Unit 4 1060 829 1052 1020 755 657 733 837 700 803 San Luis Obispo San Carpoforo Creek USFS6, CDPR 26 46 52 11 0 53 0 0 16 1 Point Sierra Nevada CDPR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Arroya de La Cruz CDPR 2 0 Sydney's Lagoon CDPR 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 Arroyo Laguna Creek CDPR 0 0 0 0 44 0 31 27 0 Little Pico Creek CDPR 28 0 San Simeon State Beach CDPR 143 54 38 0 43 0 0 0 46 33 Santa Rosa State Beach CDPR 18 0 0 Estero Bluffs State Beach CDPR 32 45 84 106 10 63 112 52 28 33 Toro Creek Private 0 121 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Morro Strand SB CDPR 249 44 8 10 1 0 105 24 1 81 Morro Rock City Beach City of Morro Bay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Morro Bay Sandspit: City sector City of Morro Bay 0 63 0 3 26 7 0 0 28 Morro Bay Sandspit: State sector CDPR 103 3 41 30 55 19 40 0 0 50 Pismo State Beach CDPR 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 0 Oceano Dunes SVRA CDPR 154 141 91 114 62 89 117 138 118 113 ODSVRA Oso Flaco Natural Area CDPR 32 18 8 18 0 3 35 18 32 22 Guadalupe-Nipomo Dunes NWR USFWS 29 9 5 22 0 22 1 38 44 39 Chevron (formerly Unocal) Property Private 72 57 59 26 37 42 12 16 26 25 County Total 840 538 449 346 211 361 429 338 402 425 Santa Barbara Rancho Guadalupe Dunes Co. Park County 94 61 27 41 115 49 97 31 38 48 Mussel Rock Beach Private 0 8 16 4 34 3 29 0 30 Paradise Beach Private NS 0 0 0 0 0 0 Point Sal SB CDPR 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vandenberg AFB North beaches US Air Force 82 46 64 105 94 100 99 168 114 86 Vandenberg AFB South beaches US Air Force 224 113 212 179 289 111 151 125 82 67 Jalama Beach County 0 0 5 0 0 0 34 57 81 Gaviota State Beach CDPR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Refugio State Beach CDPR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2011-12 CA winter SNPL Survey SITE OWNER 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 El Capitan State Beach CDPR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hollister Private 45 NS Haskell's Beach Private 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ellwood Beach City of Goleta 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 Coal Oil Pt.
Recommended publications
  • Doggin' America's Beaches

    Doggin' America's Beaches

    Doggin’ America’s Beaches A Traveler’s Guide To Dog-Friendly Beaches - (and those that aren’t) Doug Gelbert illustrations by Andrew Chesworth Cruden Bay Books There is always something for an active dog to look forward to at the beach... DOGGIN’ AMERICA’S BEACHES Copyright 2007 by Cruden Bay Books All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without permission in writing from the Publisher. Cruden Bay Books PO Box 467 Montchanin, DE 19710 www.hikewithyourdog.com International Standard Book Number 978-0-9797074-4-5 “Dogs are our link to paradise...to sit with a dog on a hillside on a glorious afternoon is to be back in Eden, where doing nothing was not boring - it was peace.” - Milan Kundera Ahead On The Trail Your Dog On The Atlantic Ocean Beaches 7 Your Dog On The Gulf Of Mexico Beaches 6 Your Dog On The Pacific Ocean Beaches 7 Your Dog On The Great Lakes Beaches 0 Also... Tips For Taking Your Dog To The Beach 6 Doggin’ The Chesapeake Bay 4 Introduction It is hard to imagine any place a dog is happier than at a beach. Whether running around on the sand, jumping in the water or just lying in the sun, every dog deserves a day at the beach. But all too often dog owners stopping at a sandy stretch of beach are met with signs designed to make hearts - human and canine alike - droop: NO DOGS ON BEACH.
  • City of Encinitas Sea Level Rise Workshop

    City of Encinitas Sea Level Rise Workshop

    City of Encinitas Sea Level Rise Workshop Climate Action Plan May 8, 2018 Crystal Najera, CAP Program Administrator 1 PRESENTATION OVERVIEW How does the City’s Climate Action Plan address Sea Level Rise? 2 Global Climate Change 3 GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE 4 GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE Industrial activities have raised global atmospheric carbon dioxide levels from 280 parts per million to 400 parts per million in the last 150 years. 5 GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE Temperatures will More droughts and continue to rise heat waves The frost-free season (growing season) will Sea level will rise lengthen 1-4 feet by 2100 Change in precipitation Hurricanes will become patterns stronger and more intense 6 Local Climate Change 7 ENCINITAS CLIMATE ACTION PLAN • Mitigation • Adaptation 8 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS (2012) 9 LOCAL CLIMATE CHANGE 85 Average Temperature 80 80 78 Average Temperature 75 74 (Avg) Degrees Fahrenheit Degrees 80 70 1950 2005 2050 2099 50 74 Extreme Heat Events 37 40 93F + 30 20 Days per yearper Days 10 4 12 10 Source: Cal-Adapt 0 1960-2005 2090-2099 LOCAL CLIMATE CHANGE Extreme Heat Days (93.3 F or more) 37 12 4 11 Source: Cal-Adapt LOCAL CLIMATE CHANGE 20 18 Annual Rainfall 16 14 14.5 12 10.9 (Avg) 11.1 11.6 10 10.8 Inches 8 6 4 2 0 1950-2005 2050 2099 Fire Risk 12 Source: Cal-Adapt 6 5.5 Sea Level Rise High Emissions Scenario 5 4 3 Feet 2.0 2 Low Emissions Scenario 1.0 1 1.4 0.2 0.4 0 2000 2030 2050 2100 Source: Encinitas Climate Action Plan, 2018; San Diego Coastal Resilience Assessment, 2012 LOCAL CLIMATE CHANGE Sea Level Rise 167 cm (SD high)
  • Attachment Iii: Baseline Status and Cumulative Effects for the San Francisco Bay Listed Species

    Attachment Iii: Baseline Status and Cumulative Effects for the San Francisco Bay Listed Species

    ATTACHMENT III: BASELINE STATUS AND CUMULATIVE EFFECTS FOR THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY LISTED SPECIES 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1: ALAMEDAWHIPSNAKE ............................................................................................ 6 1.1 CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ...................................................................................... 6 1.2 ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE........................................................................... 6 1.2.1 Factors affecting species within the action area ............................................... 6 1.2.1.1 Urban development .................................................................................... 7 1.2.1.2 Fire suppression ......................................................................................... 9 1.2.1.3 Predation .................................................................................................... 9 1.2.1.4 Grazing practices ..................................................................................... 10 1.2.1.5 Non-native species ................................................................................... 10 1.2.2 Baseline Status ................................................................................................ 11 1.3 REFERENCES ...................................................................................................... 13 2: BAY CHECKERSPOT BUTTERFLY ....................................................................... 14 2.1 CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ..................................................................................
  • 2020 Pacific Coast Winter Window Survey Results

    2020 Pacific Coast Winter Window Survey Results

    2020 Winter Window Survey for Snowy Plovers on U.S. Pacific Coast with 2013-2020 Results for Comparison. Note: blanks indicate no survey was conducted. REGION SITE OWNER 2017 2018 2019 2020 2020 Date Primary Observer(s) Gray's Harbor Copalis Spit State Parks 0 0 0 0 28-Jan C. Sundstrum Conner Creek State Parks 0 0 0 0 28-Jan C. Sundstrum, W. Michaelis Damon Point WDNR 0 0 0 0 30-Jan C. Sundstrum Oyhut Spit WDNR 0 0 0 0 30-Jan C. Sundstrum Ocean Shores to Ocean City 4 10 0 9 28-Jan C. Sundstrum, W. Michaelis County Total 4 10 0 9 Pacific Midway Beach Private, State Parks 22 28 58 66 27-Jan C. Sundstrum, W. Michaelis Graveyard Spit Shoalwater Indian Tribe 0 0 0 0 30-Jan C. Sundstrum, R. Ashley Leadbetter Point NWR USFWS, State Parks 34 3 15 0 11-Feb W. Ritchie South Long Beach Private 6 0 7 0 10-Feb W. Ritchie Benson Beach State Parks 0 0 0 0 20-Jan W. Ritchie County Total 62 31 80 66 Washington Total 66 41 80 75 Clatsop Fort Stevens State Park (Clatsop Spit) ACOE, OPRD 10 19 21 20-Jan T. Pyle, D. Osis DeLaura Beach OPRD No survey Camp Rilea DOD 0 0 0 No survey Sunset Beach OPRD 0 No survey Del Rio Beach OPRD 0 No survey Necanicum Spit OPRD 0 0 0 20-Jan J. Everett, S. Everett Gearhart Beach OPRD 0 No survey Columbia R-Necanicum R. OPRD No survey County Total 0 10 19 21 Tillamook Nehalem Spit OPRD 0 17 26 19-Jan D.
  • P.L. 94-171 COUNTY BLOCK MAP (2010 CENSUS): San Diego County, CA 117.270098W

    P.L. 94-171 COUNTY BLOCK MAP (2010 CENSUS): San Diego County, CA 117.270098W

    33.107128N 33.105876N 117.34042W P.L. 94-171 COUNTY BLOCK MAP (2010 CENSUS): San Diego County, CA 117.270098W 2040* Avena Ct W C t 2002* 2023 C Seascape Dr Towhee Ln Avena Ct E i 2059* S 3008* n 2004* a n r r T 2056* Butt H Cattail Pl d e a e r n Ponto Dr 3006* cu e e p d R F Ca a 3001* m r a 2022* s t d on l R R i ras W t p Cir 3004* r LEGEND a 4004* 4006* l 3005* urina Ct g i u t o Breakwater Rd al Macadamia Dr o rc e a e S S w h R d n R Strand St n te e n 3001* r Q R Sandbar Way i t r t D t a a u T o u e D t B a u Ave e 2055* k P s l i c h P s e 2050 r c B c a l e a u C t t a d l a t r p l l y Sandcastle Dr e R C us e 3008 P C 3012* P S h r B r l SYMBOL DESCRIPTION SYMBOL LABEL STYLE m D y C 2025* Coral o m s t i 3009* Waters End Dr u n Lobelia Ct v P r t l s e Conosa 2024 a r e s r ll e ly t i F C n id St Mallee 178.11 W Reef Ave D A o e 4013* s E Way Sweetwater St s Ct l r l 3011 h r 3005* 2012* e B t 3000* a D Federal American Indian s r C e t r r t A l Pso del Norte g T r viara t u i t a Catamaran Dr d P C e e e r u Crane Ct C e L'ANSE RES 1880 S l l M f i Pkwy Reservation o S o 2010 s f a d Tradewinds Dr h i d in R r t O o Brookside C R k i o 2060 4001* V Sage Ct Dr Snapdragon P Blac r r r 2049* r l fb c t 2009 2001 d h R e r C e Raintree l l li Wimbrel Ct i t u id n o Co e a S r L M W m 2017* Dr s T n S o D a e r c l 2054 r gu o r Off-Reservation Trust Land, e Ivy St a 4001* t P g rit e e D r Pl n e L n A r h t m T1880 s m Pl Goldfinch D t Hawaiian Home Land u Way b r r u r e h r N Boxthorn Way Ter o 4012* D v 2008 T A 2051* s
  • Pacific Coast SNPL 2012 Breeding Survey with WA OR CA

    Pacific Coast SNPL 2012 Breeding Survey with WA OR CA

    2012 Summer Window Survey for Snowy Plovers on U.S. Pacific Coast with 2005-2011 Results for Comparison. Note: blanks indicate no survey was conducted. Total Adults 2012 Adult Breakdown REGION SITE OWNER 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 male fem. sex? Grays Harbor Copalis Spit State Parks 00000 00 00 0 Conner Creek State Parks 00000 00 00 0 Damon Point/Oyhut S. Parks, D. Nat R. F & W 500000 00 00 0 County Total 500000 00 00 0 Pacific Midway Beach Private, State Parks 23 25 22 12 16 18 22 11 65 0 Graveyard Shoalwater Indian Tribe 10 0 0 2 11 0 Leadbetter Point NWR USFWS, State Parks 9 42282926201215 10 4 1 South Long Beach Private 00000 County Total 32 67 50 42 42 38 34 28 17 10 1 Washington Total 37 67 50 42 42 38 34 28 17 10 1 Clatsop Fort Stevens State Park (Clatsop Spit) ACOE, OPRD 0 0 0 0 1 00 1 Necanicum Spit OPRD 0000 0 01 00 1 County Total 000000 02 00 2 Tillamook Nehalem Spit OPRD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 Bayocean Spit ACOE 00000 00 00 0 Netarts Spit OPRD 000000 00 00 0 Sand Lake Spit (S) USFS 000000 00 00 0 Nestucca Spit OPRD 0000 0 0 00 0 County Total 000000 00 00 0 Lane Baker Beach/Sutton Creek USFS 0200 1 00 00 0 Sutton Cr./Siuslaw River N Jetty USFS 0 0 0 0 00 0 Siuslaw River S Jetty to Siltcoos USFS 4 40 0 Siltcoos Spits N & S USFS 11 18 16 11 17 18 18 22 11 10 1 County Total 11 20 16 11 17 19 18 26 15 10 1 Douglas Siltcoos-Tahkenitch (Dunes Overlook) USFS 9 2 19 7 6 19 39 42 22 20 0 Tahkenitch Spit N & S USFS 515035132716 11 0 Umpqua River S Jetty to Tenmile Spit USFS 0 11 10 12 57 0 County Total 14 3 24 7 20 24 62 81 43 38 0 Coos Tenmile Spits USFS 13 15 27 24 24 36 13 16 88 0 Coos Bay N Spit BLM, ACOE 27 27 26 30 41 38 39 52 35 17 0 Whiskey Run to Coquille River OPRD 0000 00 00 0 Bandon State Park to New River OPRD, Private, BLM 22 12 15 8 14 40 16 14 95 0 County Total 62 54 68 62 79 114 68 82 52 30 0 Curry New River to Floras Lake BLM, Private, County 13 14 17 25 24 1 20 15 96 0 Blacklock Point to Sixes River (C.
  • Tidal Marsh Recovery Plan Habitat Creation Or Enhancement Project Within 5 Miles of OAK

    Tidal Marsh Recovery Plan Habitat Creation Or Enhancement Project Within 5 Miles of OAK

    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Recovery Plan for Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California California clapper rail Suaeda californica Cirsium hydrophilum Chloropyron molle Salt marsh harvest mouse (Rallus longirostris (California sea-blite) var. hydrophilum ssp. molle (Reithrodontomys obsoletus) (Suisun thistle) (soft bird’s-beak) raviventris) Volume II Appendices Tidal marsh at China Camp State Park. VII. APPENDICES Appendix A Species referred to in this recovery plan……………....…………………….3 Appendix B Recovery Priority Ranking System for Endangered and Threatened Species..........................................................................................................11 Appendix C Species of Concern or Regional Conservation Significance in Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California….......................................13 Appendix D Agencies, organizations, and websites involved with tidal marsh Recovery.................................................................................................... 189 Appendix E Environmental contaminants in San Francisco Bay...................................193 Appendix F Population Persistence Modeling for Recovery Plan for Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California with Intial Application to California clapper rail …............................................................................209 Appendix G Glossary……………......................................................................………229 Appendix H Summary of Major Public Comments and Service
  • Light-Footed Ridgway's (Clapper) Rail in California

    Light-Footed Ridgway's (Clapper) Rail in California

    Light-footed Ridgway’s (Clapper) Rail in California 2018 Season By Richard Zembal, Susan M. Hoffman, John Konecny, and Beth Sabiston Final Report to US Fish and Wildlife Service and California Department of Fish and Wildlife Light-footed Ridgway’s (Clapper) Rail in California 2018 Season Richard Zembal, Susan M. Hoffman, John Konecny, and Beth Sabiston Clapper Rail Recovery Fund Huntington Beach Wetlands Conservancy 24821 Buckboard Lane Laguna Hills, CA 92653 December 21, 2018 Table of Contents ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................... 2 METHODS ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Population Monitoring .........................................................................................................4 Nest Monitoring ...................................................................................................................5 Breeding in Zoological Facilities .........................................................................................6 Banding and Tracking ..........................................................................................................8 STUDY AREAS ............................................................................................................................
  • Regional Parks Service Area Map City of Los Angeles, California Current Recommended Guideline of 8.0 Acres Per 1,000 Residents

    Regional Parks Service Area Map City of Los Angeles, California Current Recommended Guideline of 8.0 Acres Per 1,000 Residents

    Regional Parks Service Area Map City of Los Angeles, California Current Recommended Guideline of 8.0 Acres per 1,000 Residents ¦¨§14 THE CASCADES GOLF CLUB 1 WILSON CANYON PARK THE CASCADES GOLF CLUB 2 EL CARISO REGIONAL COUNTY PARK O'MELVENY PARK EL CARISO GOLF COURSE Recreation LIMEKILN CANYON PARK KNOLLWOOD COUNTY GOLF COURSE and Parks BROWNS CREEK PARK ALISO CANYON PARK Ventura Department 118 ¦¨§ ANGELES NATIONAL FOREST Needs Assessment SANTA SUSANA PASS STATE HISTORIC PARK HANSEN DAM QUARRY LAKE HANSEN DAM RECREATION AREA CHATSWORTH PARK, SOUTH HANSEN DAM GOLF COURSE DEUKMEJIAN WILDERNESS PARK North Valley APC CHATSWORTH RESERVOIR SITE ¦¨§210 LA TUNA CANYON PARK VERDUGO MOUNTAIN PARK BELL CANYON OPEN SPACE 1 BELL CANYON PARK EL ESCORPION PARK ¦¨§170 KNAPP RANCH PARK VALLEY PLAZA PARK BEILENSON (ANTHONY C.) PARK BALBOA SPORTS CENTER WOODLEY AVENUE PARK BALBOA GOLF COURSE South Valley APC ¦¨§101 ENCINO GOLF COURSE LOS ENCINOS STATE HISTORIC PARK NORTH HOLLYWOOD PARK GRIFFITH PARK: L.A. EQUESTRIAN CENTER VAN NUYS ‐ SHERMAN OAKS PARK ¦¨§134 NATIONAL PARK SERVICE HARDING GOLF COURSE STATE PARK LAND 10 WILSON GOLF COURSE 5 STATE PARK LAND 8 ¦¨§ WESTRIDGE CANYONBACK PARK 1 FOSSIL RIDGE PARK WILACRE PARK GRIFFITH PARK DIXIE CANYON PARKSTATE PARK LAND 7 SEPULVEDA PASS OPEN SPACE 2SEPULVEDA PASS OPEN SPACE 1 STATE PARK LAND 4 GRIFFITH PARK: BRONSON CANYON FRYMAN CANYON PARK ROOSEVELT GOLF COURSE BEVERLY GLEN PARK WESTRIDGE CANYONBACK PARK 2 STATE PARK LAND 1 RUNYON CANYON PARK ARROYO SECO PARK STATE PARK LAND 5 STATE PARK LAND 2 ELYSIAN VALLEY
  • 2011 Progress Report Full Version 02 12.Indd

    2011 Progress Report Full Version 02 12.Indd

    CALIFORNIA RECREATIONAL TRAILS PLAN Providing Vision and Direction for California Trails Tahoe Rim Trail Tahoe Rim Trail TahoeTTahhoe RRiRimm TrailTTrail Complete Progress Report 2011 California State Parks Planning Division Statewide Trails Section www.parks.ca.gov/trails/trailsplan Message from the Director Th e ability to exercise and enjoy nature in the outdoors is critical to the physical and mental health of California’s population. Trails and greenways provide the facilities for these activities. Our surveys of Californian’s recreational use patterns over the years have shown that our variety of trails, from narrow back-country trails to spacious paved multi-use facilities, provide experiences that attract more users than any other recreational facility in California. Th e increasing population and desire for trails are increasing pressures on the agencies charged with their planning, maintenance and management. As leaders in the planning and management of all types of trail systems, California State Parks is committed to assisting the state’s recreation providers by complying with its legislative mandate of recording the progress of the California Recreational Trails Plan. During the preparation of this progress report, input was received through surveys, two California Recreational Trails Committee public meetings and a session at the 2011 California Trails and Greenways Conference. Preparation of this progress Above: Director Ruth Coleman report included extensive research into the current status of the 27 California Trail Corridors, determining which of these corridors need administrative, funding or planning assistance. Research and public input regarding the Plan’s twelve Goals and their associated Action Guidelines have identifi ed both encouraging progress and areas where more attention is needed.
  • 2011 Pacific Coast Breeding Window Survey

    2011 Pacific Coast Breeding Window Survey

    2011 Summer Window Survey for Snowy Plovers on U.S. Pacific Coast with 2005-2010 Results for Comparison. Note: blanks indicate no survey was conducted. Total Adults 2011 Adult Breakdown REGION SITE OWNER 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 male fem. sex? Date Primary Observer(s) Grays Harbor Copalis Spit State Parks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27-May Warren Michaelis Conner Creek State Parks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27-May Scott Harris Damon Point/Oyhut S. Parks, D. Nat R. F & W 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2-Jun Cyndie Sundstrom County Total 50 0 00 0 0 00 0 Pacific Midway Beach Private, State Parks 23 25 22 12 16 18 22 8 13 1 23-May Cyndie Sundstrom, Scott Harris, Warren Michaelis Graveyard Shoalwater Indian Tribe 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 18-May Cyndie Sundstrom, Scott Harris, Steve Spencer Leadbetter Point NWR USFWS, State Parks 9 42 28 29 26 20 12 5 6 1 24-May W. Ritchie, C. Sundstrom, S. Pearson, W. Michaelis, S. Harris, M. Fernandez South Long Beach Private 00000 County Total 32 67 50 42 42 38 34 13 19 2 Washington Total 37 67 50 42 42 38 34 13 19 2 Clatsop Fort Stevens State Park (Clatsop Spit) ACOE, OPRD 0 0 0 0 00 0 23-May Kathy Roberts, Andrea Barry Necanicum Spit OPRD 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 27-May Dave Nuzum County Total 00 0 00 0 0 00 0 Tillamook Nehalem Spit OPRD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23-May Herman Biederbeck Bayocean Spit ACOE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27-May Charlie Bruce, Michelle Schuiteman Netarts Spit OPRD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1-Jun Liz Kelly, Fran Recht Sand Lake Spit (S) USFS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27-May Jeff Everett Nestucca Spit OPRD 0 0 0 0 0 County Total 00 0 00 0 0 00
  • Assessing the Economic Benefits of Reductions in Marine Debris: a Pilot Study of Beach Recreation in Orange County, California

    Assessing the Economic Benefits of Reductions in Marine Debris: a Pilot Study of Beach Recreation in Orange County, California

    FINAL REPORT Assessing the Economic Benefits of Reductions in Marine Debris: A Pilot Study of Beach Recreation in Orange County, California FINAL | June 15, 2014 prepared for: Marine Debris Division National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration prepared by: Chris Leggett, Nora Scherer, Mark Curry and Ryan Bailey Industrial Economics, Incorporated 2067 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02140 And Timothy Haab Ohio State University Executive Summary Marine debris has many impacts on the ocean, wildlife, and coastal communities. In order to better understand the economic impacts of marine debris on coastal communities, the NOAA Marine Debris Program and Industrial Economics, Inc. designed a study that examines how marine debris influences people’s decisions to go to the beach and what it may cost them. Prior to this study, no work had directly assessed the welfare losses imposed by marine debris on citizens who regularly use beaches for recreation. This study aimed to fill that gap in knowledge. The study showed that marine debris has a considerable economic impact on Orange County, California residents. We found that: ● Residents are concerned about marine debris, and it significantly influences their decisions to go to the beach. They will likely avoid littered beaches and spend additional time and money getting to a cleaner beach or pursuing other activities. ● Avoiding littered beaches costs local residents millions of dollars each year. ● Reducing marine debris on beaches can prevent financial loss and provide economic benefits to residents. Marine debris is preventable, and the benefits associated with preventing it appear to be quite large. For example, the study found that reducing marine debris by 50 percent at beaches in Orange County could generate $67 million in benefits to Orange County residents for a three­month period.