DOCSLIB.ORG

Order CHARADRIIFORMES: Waders, Gulls and Terns Suborder LARI

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Order CHARADRIIFORMES: Waders, Gulls and Terns Suborder LARI Text extracted from Gill B.J.; Bell, B.D.; Chambers, G.K.; Medway, D.G.; Palma, R.L.; Scofield, R.P.; Tennyson, A.J.D.; Worthy, T.H. 2010. Checklist of the birds of New Zealand, Norfolk and Macquarie Islands, and the Ross Dependency, Antarctica. 4th edition. Wellington, Te Papa Press and Ornithological Society of New Zealand. Pages 191, 223, 230 & 240-241. Order CHARADRIIFORMES: Waders, Gulls and Terns The family sequence of Christidis & Boles (1994), who adopted that of Sibley et al. (1988) and Sibley & Monroe (1990), is followed here. Suborder LARI: Skuas, Gulls, Terns and Skimmers Condon (1975) and Checklist Committee (1990) recognised three subfamilies within the Laridae (Larinae, Sterninae and Megalopterinae) but this division has not been widely adopted. We follow Gochfeld & Burger (1996) in recognising gulls in one family (Laridae) and terns and noddies in another (Sternidae). The sequence of species for Stercorariidae and Laridae follows Peters (1934) and for Sternidae follows Bridge et al. (2005). Family STERNIDAE Bonaparte: Terns and Noddies Sterninae Bonaparte, 1838: Geogr. Comp. List. Birds: 61 – Type genus Sterna Linnaeus, 1758. Most recommendations from a new study of tern and noddy relationships, based on mtDNA (Bridge et al. 2005), have already been adopted by the Taxonomic Subcommittee of the British Ornithologists’ Union Records Committee (Sangster et al. 2005) and the American Ornithologists’ Union Committee on Classification and Nomenclature (Banks, R.C. et al. 2006). This follows many years of disagreement about the generic classification of terns for which 3–12 genera have recently been used (see Bridge et al. 2005). The genera and their sequence recommended by Bridge et al. (2005) are accepted here, with the exception that we place the crested tern in Sterna rather than Thalasseus, because the evidence for the latter association is weaker (Sangster et al. 2005). Genus Sterna Linnaeus Sterna Linnaeus, 1758: Syst. Nat., 10th edition 1: 137 – Type species (by tautonymy) Sterna hirundo Linnaeus. Thalasseus Boie, 1822: Isis von Oken, Heft 1: col. 563 – Type species (by subsequent designation) Thalasseus cantiacus (Gmelin) = Sterna sandvicensis Latham. Sterna vulgaris Ellman (1861: 7472 – New Zealand) is a junior synonym of Sterna striata according to Sibson (1992) but the description is inadequate, the beak colour does not fit S. striata, the Mäori name refers to S. caspia and there is no type specimen; therefore, S. vulgaris cannot be identified and is a nomen dubium. Sterna parva Ellman (1861: 7473 – New Zealand) could refer to several small tern species and, with no type specimen to confirm its identity, S. parva is also a nomen dubium. Sterna striata Gmelin White-fronted Tern Sterna striata Gmelin, 1789: Syst. Nat., 13th edition 1(2): 609 – New Zealand. Sterna velox Gould, 1843: Proc. Zool. Soc. London 1842 (10): 139 – Bass Strait. Junior primary homonym of Sterna velox Cretzschmar, 1827 = Sterna bergii velox Cretzschmar, 1827. Sterna frontalis G.R. Gray, 1845: in Richardson & J.E. Gray (eds), Zool. Voy. ‘Erebus’ & ‘Terror’, Birds 1(8): 9, pl. 20 – New Zealand. Sterna melanorhyncha Gould, 1848: Birds of Australia 7(36): pl. 26 – Tasmania. Junior secondary homonym of Sternula melanorhyncha Lesson, 1847. Sterna albifrons Peale, 1848: U.S. Expl. Exped. 8: 279, 337 – Bay of Islands. Junior secondary homonym of Sternula albifrons Pallas, 1764. Sterna atripes Ellman, 1861: Zoologist 19: 7473 – New Zealand. Sterna longipennis; Finsch 1867, Journ. für Ornith. 15: 339, 347. Not Sterna longipennis Nordmann, 1835. Sterna longipennis Nordon (sic); Potts 1882, Out in the Open: 216. Not Sterna longipennis Nordmann, 1835. Sterna bethunei Buller, 1896: Trans. Proc. N.Z. Inst. 28: 349 – Auckland Islands. Not Sterna bethunei Travers, 1896. Sterna striata incerta Mathews, 1912: Novit. Zool. 18(3): 208. Unnecessary nomen novum for Sterna melanorhyncha Gould, 1848. Sterna striata christopheri Mathews, 1912: Novit. Zool. 18(3): 209 – Point Cloates, Western Australia. Sterna striata striata Gmelin; Mathews & Iredale 1913, Ibis 1 (10th ser.): 244. Sterna striata bethunei Buller; Mathews & Iredale 1913, Ibis 1 (10th ser.): 244. Not Sterna bethunei Travers, 1896. Sterna striata yorki Mathews, 1914: Austral Avian Rec. 2: 86 – Cape York, Queensland, Australia. Sterna striata melanorhyncha Gould; Mathews 1927, Syst. Avium Australasianarum 1: 139. Sterna striata aucklandorna Mathews, 1929: Bull. Brit. Ornith. Club 50: 19. Unnecessary nomen novum for Sterna bethunei Buller, 1896. Sterna striata Gmelin; Checklist Committee 1953, Checklist N.Z. Birds: 51. Breeds abundantly from Northland (not Manawatäwhi / Three Kings Islands) to Stewart Island / Rakiura and at the Chatham and Auckland Islands; small numbers on some islands in Bass Strait (Higgins & Davies 1996, Taylor 2000a). A rare visitor to Norfolk (Hermes et al. 1986), Snares / Tini Heke (Miskelly et al. 2001a), Campbell / Motu Ihupuku and Macquarie Islands (Higgins & Davies 1996). Part of the New Zealand population, including many immature birds, migrates to south-east Australia (Hindwood 1946, Clark & Dawson 1957, Serventy et al. 1971, Powlesland & Powlesland 1994b, Higgins & Davies 1996). Taylor (2000a) recognised Sterna striata aucklandorna as breeding at Chatham and Auckland Islands and the distinctiveness of this subspecies is worthy of further investigation (Higgins & Davies 1996). Fossil and midden records from North, South and Chatham Islands (Checklist Committee 1990, Millener 1991); one Late Pleistocene record (Worthy & Grant- Mackie 2003). .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Promoting Change in Common Tern (Sterna Hirundo) Nest Site Selection to Minimize Construction Related Disturbance
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln US Fish & Wildlife Publications US Fish & Wildlife Service 9-2019 Promoting Change in Common Tern (Sterna hirundo) Nest Site Selection to Minimize Construction Related Disturbance. Peter C. McGowan Jeffery D. Sullivan Carl R. Callahan William Schultz Jennifer L. Wall See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usfwspubs This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the US Fish & Wildlife Service at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in US Fish & Wildlife Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Authors Peter C. McGowan, Jeffery D. Sullivan, Carl R. Callahan, William Schultz, Jennifer L. Wall, and Diann J. Prosser Table 2. The caloric values of seeds from selected Bowler, P.A. and M.E. Elvin. 2003. The vascular plant checklist for the wetland and upland vascular plant species in adjacent University of California Natural Reserve System’s San Joaquin habitats. Freshwater Marsh Reserve. Crossosoma 29:45−66. Clarke, C.B. 1977. Edible and Useful Plants of California. Berkeley, Calories in CA: University of California Press. Calories per Gram of seed 100 Grams Earle, F.R. and Q. Jones. 1962. Analyses of seed samples from 113 Wetland Vascular Plant Species plant families. Economic Botanist 16:221−231. Ambrosia psilolstachya (4.24 calories/g) 424 calories Ensminger, A.H., M.E. Ensminger, J.E. Konlande and J.R.K. Robson. Artemisia douglasiana (3.55 calories/g) 355 calories 1995. The Concise Encyclopedia of Foods and Nutrition.
    [Show full text]
  • LEAST TERN Scientific Name: Sternula Antillarum Lesson Other
    Common Name: LEAST TERN Scientific Name: Sternula antillarum Lesson Other Commonly Used Names: Little tern, silver turnlet, sea swallow, minute tern, little striker, and killing peter Previously Used Names: Sterna antillarum Family: Laridae Rarity Ranks: G4/S3 State Legal Status: Rare Federal Legal Status: Interior population listed as endangered. Other populations are not federally listed. Federal Wetland Status: N/A Description: Georgia's smallest tern at about 23 cm (9 in) in length with a 50 cm (20 in) wingspread, the least tern is white with pale gray feathers on the back and upper surfaces of the wings, except for a narrow black stripe along the leading edge of the upper wing feathers. The least tern has a black cap with a small patch of white on the forehead. In summer, the adult has a yellow bill with a black tip and yellow to orange feet and legs. Its tail is deeply forked. In winter, the bill, legs and feet are black. The juvenile has a black bill and yellow legs, and the feathers of the back have dark margins, giving the bird a distinctly "scaled" appearance. The least tern's small size, white forehead, and yellow bill serve to distinguish it from other terns. Similar Species: The adult sandwich tern (Thalasseus sandvicensis) is the most similar species to the adult least tern, but is much larger at about 38 cm (15 in) in length and has a black bill with a pale (usually yellow) tip and black legs. Juvenile least terns and sandwich terns look very similar in appearance.
    [Show full text]
  • Sterna Hirundo Linnaeus, 1758
    Sterna hirundo Linnaeus, 1758 AphiaID: 137162 COMMON TERN Gnathostomata (Infrafilo) > Tetrapoda (Superclasse) > Laridae (Familia) Jorge Araújo da Silva / Nov. 09 2011 Jorge Araújo da Silva / Mai. 02 2013 Jorge Araújo da Silva / Mai. 04 2013 Jorge Araújo da Silva / Nov. 09 2011 1 Jorge Araújo da Silva / Nov. 09 2011 Facilmente confundível com: Sternula albifrons Chlidonias niger Andorinha-do-mar-anã Gaivina-preta Sterna sandvicensis Garajau-comum Estatuto de Conservação Principais ameaças 2 Sinónimos Gaivina, Garajau (Madeira e Açores) Sterna fluviatilis Naumann, 1839 Referências Sepe, K. 2002. “Sterna hirundo” (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed November 30, 2018 at https://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Sterna_hirundo/ BirdLife International. 2018. Sterna hirundo. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2018: e.T22694623A132562687. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2018 2.RLTS.T22694623A132562687.en original description Linnaeus, C. (1758). Systema Naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Editio decima, reformata. Laurentius Salvius: Holmiae. ii, 824 pp., available online athttps://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.542 [details] additional source Cattrijsse, A.; Vincx, M. (2001). Biodiversity of the benthos and the avifauna of the Belgian coastal waters: summary of data collected between 1970 and 1998. Sustainable Management of the North Sea. Federal Office for Scientific, Technical and Cultural Affairs: Brussel, Belgium. 48 pp. [details] basis of record van der Land, J. (2001). Tetrapoda, in: Costello, M.J. et al. (Ed.) (2001). European register of marine species: a check-list of the marine species in Europe and a bibliography of guides to their identification. Collection Patrimoines Naturels, 50: pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Mute Swan (Cygnus Olor) ERSS
    Mute Swan (Cygnus olor) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, February 2011 Revised, November 2018, March 2019 Web Version, 8/16/2019 Photo: Nolasco Diaz. Licensed under CC BY-SA. Available: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cisne_por_la_noche.jpg. (11/28/2018). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range According to GISD (2018), Cygnus olor is native to Australia, Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Europe, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, India, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Kazakhstan, Korea, Democratic People's Republic Of Korea, Republic Of Latvia, Lithuania, Republic Of Moldova, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russian Federation, Serbia And Montenegro, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, and the United Kingdom. 1 From BirdLife International (2018): “NATIVE Extant (breeding) Kazakhstan; Mongolia; Russian Federation (Eastern Asian Russia); Turkmenistan Extant (non-breeding) Afghanistan; Armenia; Cyprus; Iran, Islamic Republic of; Iraq; Korea, Republic of; Kyrgyzstan; Spain Extant (passage) Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Extant (resident) Albania; Austria; Azerbaijan; Belarus; Belgium; Croatia; Czech Republic; Greece; Hungary; Ireland; Italy; Liechtenstein; Luxembourg; Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of; Montenegro; Netherlands; Russian Federation; Serbia; Slovenia; Switzerland; Turkey; United Kingdom Extant Bosnia and Herzegovina; Bulgaria; China; Denmark; Estonia; Finland;
    [Show full text]
  • California Least Tern (Sternula Antillarum Browni)
    California least tern (Sternula antillarum browni) 5-Year Review Summary and Evaluation u.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office Carlsbad, California September 2006 5-YEARREVIEW California least tern (Sternula antillarum browni) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. GENERAL INFORMATION 1 1.1. REVIEWERS 1 1.2. METHODOLOGY USED TO COMPLETE THE REVIEW: 1 1.3. BACKGROUND: 1 2. REVIEW ANALYSIS 2 2.1. ApPLICATION OF THE 1996 DISTINCT POPULATION SEGMENT (DPS) POLICY 2 2.2. RECOVERY CRITERIA 2 2.3. UPDATED INFORMATION AND CURRENT SPECIES STATUS 5 2.4. SyNTHESIS 22 3. RESULTS 22 3.1. RECOMMENDED CLASSIFICATION 22 3.2. NEW RECOVERY PRIORITY NUMBER 22 3.3. LISTING AND RECLASSIFICATION PRIORITY NUMBER, IF RECLASSIFICATION IS RECOMMENDED 23 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE ACTIONS 23 5.0 REFERENCES •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 24 11 5-YEAR REVIEW California least tern (Sternula antillarum browni) 1. GENERAL INFORMATION 1.1. Reviewers Lead Region: Diane Elam and Mary Grim, California-Nevada Operations Office, 916- 414-6464 Lead Field Office: Jim A. Bartel, Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Service, 760-431-9440 1.2. Metnodoiogy used to complete the review: This review was compiled by staffofthe Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office (CFWO). The review was completed using documents from office files as well as available literature on the California least tern. 1.3. Background: 1.3.1. FR Notice citation announcing initiation of this review: The notice announcing the initiation ofthis 5-year review and opening ofthe first comment period for 60 days was published on July 7, 2005 (70 FR 39327). A notice reopening the comment period for 60 days was published on November 3, 2005 (70 FR 66842).
    [Show full text]
  • Draft National Recovery Plan for the Australian Fairy Tern Sternula Nereis Nereis
    Draft National Recovery Plan for the Australian Fairy Tern Sternula nereis nereis The Species Profile and Threats Database pages linked to this recovery plan is obtainable from: http://www.environment.gov.au/cgi-bin/sprat/public/sprat.pl Image credit: Adult Australian Fairy Tern (Sternula nereis nereis) over Rottnest Island, Western Australia © Georgina Steytler © Copyright Commonwealth of Australia, 2019. The National Recovery Plan for the Australian Fairy Tern (Sternula nereis nereis) is licensed by the Commonwealth of Australia for use under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence with the exception of the Coat of Arms of the Commonwealth of Australia, the logo of the agency responsible for publishing the report, content supplied by third parties, and any images depicting people. For licence conditions see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. This report should be attributed as ‘National Recovery Plan for the Australian Fairy Tern (Sternula nereis nereis), Commonwealth of Australia 2019’. The Commonwealth of Australia has made all reasonable efforts to identify content supplied by third parties using the following format ‘© Copyright, [name of third party] ’. Disclaimer While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this publication are factually correct, the Commonwealth does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the
    [Show full text]
  • SHOREBIRDS (Charadriiformes*) CARE MANUAL *Does Not Include Alcidae
    SHOREBIRDS (Charadriiformes*) CARE MANUAL *Does not include Alcidae CREATED BY AZA CHARADRIIFORMES TAXON ADVISORY GROUP IN ASSOCIATION WITH AZA ANIMAL WELFARE COMMITTEE Shorebirds (Charadriiformes) Care Manual Shorebirds (Charadriiformes) Care Manual Published by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums in association with the AZA Animal Welfare Committee Formal Citation: AZA Charadriiformes Taxon Advisory Group. (2014). Shorebirds (Charadriiformes) Care Manual. Silver Spring, MD: Association of Zoos and Aquariums. Original Completion Date: October 2013 Authors and Significant Contributors: Aimee Greenebaum: AZA Charadriiformes TAG Vice Chair, Monterey Bay Aquarium, USA Alex Waier: Milwaukee County Zoo, USA Carol Hendrickson: Birmingham Zoo, USA Cindy Pinger: AZA Charadriiformes TAG Chair, Birmingham Zoo, USA CJ McCarty: Oregon Coast Aquarium, USA Heidi Cline: Alaska SeaLife Center, USA Jamie Ries: Central Park Zoo, USA Joe Barkowski: Sedgwick County Zoo, USA Kim Wanders: Monterey Bay Aquarium, USA Mary Carlson: Charadriiformes Program Advisor, Seattle Aquarium, USA Sara Perry: Seattle Aquarium, USA Sara Crook-Martin: Buttonwood Park Zoo, USA Shana R. Lavin, Ph.D.,Wildlife Nutrition Fellow University of Florida, Dept. of Animal Sciences , Walt Disney World Animal Programs Dr. Stephanie McCain: AZA Charadriiformes TAG Veterinarian Advisor, DVM, Birmingham Zoo, USA Phil King: Assiniboine Park Zoo, Canada Reviewers: Dr. Mike Murray (Monterey Bay Aquarium, USA) John C. Anderson (Seattle Aquarium volunteer) Kristina Neuman (Point Blue Conservation Science) Sarah Saunders (Conservation Biology Graduate Program,University of Minnesota) AZA Staff Editors: Maya Seaman, MS, Animal Care Manual Editing Consultant Candice Dorsey, PhD, Director of Animal Programs Debborah Luke, PhD, Vice President, Conservation & Science Cover Photo Credits: Jeff Pribble Disclaimer: This manual presents a compilation of knowledge provided by recognized animal experts based on the current science, practice, and technology of animal management.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Review of Tern (Sterna & Sternula Spp.) Foraging Ecology
    Literature review of tern foraging ecology Contract ref. C13-0204-0686 August 2013 Literature review of tern (Sterna & Sternula spp.) foraging ecology Arctic Tern Little Tern Roseate Tern Contract ref. C13-0204-0686 ECON Ecological Consultancy Limited Unit 7, The Octagon Business Park, Little Plumstead, Norwich, Norfolk NR13 5FH Registered in England & Wales Company No. 6457758. Page 1 Director: Dr Martin Perrow BSc, PhD, MIEEM, MIFM, CEnv C0mpany Secretary: Eleanor Skeate BSc Literature review of tern (Sterna & Sternula spp.) foraging ecology Contract ref. C13-0204-0686 Final report July 2014 Authors: Sarah M. Eglington & M.R. Perrow ECON Ecological Consultancy Ltd. Unit 7, The Octagon Business Park Little Plumstead Norwich Norfolk NR13 5FH On behalf of: Amanda Kuepfer & Linda Wilson The Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC) Inverdee House Baxter Street Aberdeen AB11 9QA Foraging ecology of the five UK terns Contents Contents .............................................................................................................. i 1 Introduction ................................................................................................ 1 2 Methods ...................................................................................................... 1 3 Species accounts ......................................................................................... 1 3.1 Little tern Sternula albifrons .................................................................................. 1 3.1.1 Foraging range ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Caribbean Roseate Tern and North Atlantic Roseate Tern (Sterna Dougallii Dougallii)
    Caribbean Roseate Tern and North Atlantic Roseate Tern (Sterna dougallii dougallii) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation Photo Jorge E. Saliva U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Caribbean Ecological Services Field Office Boquerón, Puerto Rico Northeast Region New England Field Office Concord, New Hampshire September 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION 1.1 Reviewers............................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Methodology........................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Background............................................................................................................. 2 1.3.1 FR Notice………………………………………………………………… 2 1.3.2 Listing history……………………………………………...…………….. 2 1.3.3 Associated rulemakings………………………………………………….. 3 1.3.4 Review history…………………………………………………………… 3 1.3.5 Recovery Priority Number………………………………………….……. 3 1.3.6 Recovery plans…………………………………………………………… 3 2.0 REVIEW ANALYSIS 2.1 Application of the 1996 Distinct Population Segment policy................................ 3 2.1.1 Is the species under review a vertebrate?................................................... 4 2.1.2 Is the DPS policy applicable?..................................................................... 4 ENDANGERED NORTHEAST POPULATION 2.2 Recovery Criteria..................................................................................................... 7 2.2.1 Does the species have a
    [Show full text]
  • Population Structure in the South American Tern Sterna Hirundinacea in the South Atlantic: Two Populations with Distinct Breeding Phenologies
    J. Avian Biol. 41: 378Á387, 2010 doi: 10.1111/j.1600-048X.2009.04902.x # 2010 The Authors. J. Compilation # 2010 J. Avian Biol. Received 11 May 2009, accepted 16 December 2009 Population structure in the South American tern Sterna hirundinacea in the South Atlantic: two populations with distinct breeding phenologies Patrı´cia J. Faria, Fausto P. Campos, Joaquim O. Branco, Ce´zar M. Musso, Joa˜o S. Morgante and Michael W. Bruford P. J. Faria ([email protected]) and J. S. Morgante, Dept. de Gene´tica e Biol. Evol., IB-USP, Sa˜o Paulo, SP, Brasil. Á PJF and M. W. Bruford, School of Biosci., Cardiff Univ., Cardiff, CF10 3AX, UK. Á F. P. Campos, Inst. Florestal, SMA, SP, Brasil. Á J. O. Branco, Cttmar, Univali, Itajaı´, SC, Brasil. Á C. M. Musso, Projeto Andorinhas-do-mar, AVIDEPA, Vila Velha, ES, Brasil. The South American tern Sterna hirundinacea is a migratory species for which dispersal, site fidelity and migratory routes are largely unknown. Here, we used five microsatellite loci and 799 bp partial mitochondrial DNA sequences (Cytochrome b and ND2) to investigate the genetic structure of South American terns from the South Atlantic Ocean (Brazilian and Patagonian colonies). Brazilian and Patagonian colonies have two distinct breeding phenologies (austral winter and austral summer, respectively) and are under the influence of different oceanographic features (e.g. Brazil and Falklands/Malvinas ocean currents, respectively), that may promote genetic isolation between populations. Results show that the Atlantic populations are not completely panmictic, nevertheless, contrary to our expectations, low levels of genetic structure were detected between Brazilian and Patagonian colonies.
    [Show full text]
  • Attempted Re-Establishment of a Sooty Tern Onychoprion Fuscatus Breeding Colony on Denis Island, Seychelles
    C.J. Feare et al. / Conservation Evidence (2015) 12, 19-24 Attempted re-establishment of a sooty tern Onychoprion fuscatus breeding colony on Denis Island, Seychelles Chris J. Feare*1, Georgia C. A. French2,3, John E. G. Nevill4, Vicki S. Pattison-Willits3, Vicki Wheeler3, Tori L. Yates3, Camille Hoareau5 & Colin V. Prescott3 1 WildWings Bird Management, 2 North View Cottages, Grayswood Common, Haslemere, Surrey GU27 2DN, UK. 2 University of Sussex, School of Life Sciences, John Maynard Smith (JMS) Building, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9QG. 3 School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Harborne Building, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 6AS, UK. 4 Green Islands Foundation, ex-Vines Building, PO box 246, Victoria, Seychelles (present address Marine Research Institute, Seychelles P.O. Box 1299, Victoria, Seychelles). 5 Denis Island, Seychelles. SUMMARY Seychelles supports around three million nesting pairs of sooty terns. However, there have been recent declines and the colonies continue to face ongoing threats from habitat change and excessive commercial harvesting of their eggs, as well as potential threats by commercial fishing and climate change. A possible method to counter these threats is to re-establish breeding colonies on islands from which they have disappeared. An attempt was made to attract birds to a previously occupied island through habitat management, decoy birds and playback of recorded sooty tern calls. Habitat preparation involved predator eradication and tree removal to provide open ground with bare sandy areas and low herb vegetation. Overflying birds were attracted by broadcast calls, with some circling over and landing among the decoys. Large three-dimensional plastic models were superior to other models presented.
    [Show full text]
  • 146 NESTING of SOOTY TERNS (Onychoprion Fuscatus) in THE
    146 NOTES Florida Field Naturalist 37(4):146-148, 2009. NESTING OF SOOTY TERNS (Onychoprion fuscatus) IN THE EASTERN PANHANDLE OF FLORIDA JOHN MURPHY 766 Alligator Drive, Alligator Point, Florida 32346 In 2007 and 2008, a pair of Sooty Terns (Onychoprion fuscatus) nested on the St. George Island causeway, Franklin County, Florida. These occurrences are the second and third breeding records of this species for the county. The Sooty Tern is a widespread species of tropical oceans. The only large breeding colony (25,000-40,000 pairs) in Florida is on Bush Key at Dry Tortugas National Park, Monroe County (Robertson and Robertson 1996), though historical records list isolated breeding at Key West (Monroe County), Tampa Bay (Hillsborough County), and Frank- lin County (AOU 1983). Extralimital breeding, while not uncommon, is frequently short-lived and involves a small number of pairs (Schreiber et al. 2002). The causeway, located at 29°41’ 44.91” N, 84°53’ 7.88” W, is a sand-and-shell island constructed in 1965 as part of the Bryant Patton Bridge, which served as the thorough- fare between St. George Island and mainland Franklin County. In 2004 a new bridge was opened and with the removal of the old bridge spans the island became inaccessible except by watercraft. The causeway is 1.6 km long, with an area of approximately 20 ha (Pranty 2002), and about 2.1 km from the mainland. It is sparsely vegetated with vari- ous salt-tolerant grasses and forbs. It accommodates a number of breeding larids includ- ing Laughing Gulls (Leucophaeus atricilla), Caspian (Hydroprogne caspia), Royal (Thalasseus maximus), Sandwich (T.
    [Show full text]