New Research on Women's Participation As Candidates

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

New Research on Women's Participation As Candidates RESEARCH ON WOMEN’S PARTICIPATION AS CANDIDATES IN ELECTIONS FROM 2005 – 2015 JUNE 2017 CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS ALCP All Liberian Coalition Party Pages APD Alliance for Peace and Democracy 1. Introduction 3 ANC Alternative National Congress BCPA Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action 2. Background 4 CDC Congress for Democratic Change CEDAW Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination against Women 2.0 Research Methodology 5 CSOs Civil Society Organizations 2.1 Research Approach 5 CUP Citizens Unification Party COTOL Coalition for Transformation of Liberia 2.2 Research Design 5 FAPL Free Alliance Party of Liberia FDP Free Democratic Party 2.3 Study Area 5 GDPL Grassroots Democratic Party of Liberia 2.4 Data Collection Methods 6 LPL Labor Party of Liberia LDP Liberia Destiny Party 2.5 Secondary Data 6 LEP Liberia Empowerment Party LNU Liberia National Union 2.6 Data Analysis Techniques 6 LRP Liberia Reformation Party 2.7 Data Analysis 6 LTP Liberia Transformation Party LP Liberty Party 2.8 Results 7 MOGCSP Ministry of Gender Children and Social Protection MOVEE Movement for Economic Empowerment 2.9 Findings 14 MPC Movement for Progressive Change 2.10 Discussions 17 NDP National Democratic Coalition NEC National Elections Commission 2.11 Conclusion 17 NGO Non-Governmental Organization NPP National Patriotic Party 2.12 Recommendations 18 NRP National Reformation Party 2.13. Political party structures-women and men in political party hierarchy 21 NUDP National Union for Democratic Progress NDPL National Democratic Party of Liberia References 24 OCPL Original congress Party of Liberia PUP People’s Unification Party PDP Progressive Democratic Party PPP Progressive People’s Party RULP Reformed United Liberia Party SPSS Statistical Package for Social Science version 18.0 ULD Union of Liberian Democrats UDA United Democratic Alliance UNDP United Nations Development Programme VC Victory for Change RESEARCH ON WOMEN’S PARTICIPATION AS CANDIDATES IN ELECTIONS i RESEARCH ON WOMEN’S PARTICIPATION AS CANDIDATES IN ELECTIONS ii ACKNOWLEDGMENT 1. Introduction The research study on women’s participation as candidates in elections from 2005-2015 was The primary purpose of this study is to examine the factors that hinder or facilitate the commissioned by the National Elections Commission in 2016 to establish a base line data on the participation of women in electoral politics. Over the years, the issues regarding women political status of women and men as candidates in the elections conducted between 2005 and 2015 and in right and equal participation in electoral politics is becoming increasingly prominent in world elected offices . The outcome of the study was meant to inform key stakeholders like political politics and received varied treatment by the United Nations and its specialized agencies. The parties, government, CSOs, development partners on the reality on the ground as they promote principle of equality of men and women was recognized in the United Nations Charter (1945), gender equality and increased women participation in the 2017 elections. The outcome of the and later in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948). Liberia is a signatory of these study was also meant to be provide lessons learnt and best practices which can be replicated by declarations. Notwithstanding, the international declarations affirming the rights and equality female aspirants, female candidates and political parties fielding female candidates for the 2017 between men and women, the issues of women participation continues to bedevil political elections; building on the strengths to enable more women to be nominated as aspirants, systems and countries throughout the world. Available literature shows that women still candidates and eventually be elected into the legislature; and possibly to the presidency as they constitute a disproportionately small proportion of those participating in political decision- would be addressing the challenges and constraints experienced by the women candidates in the making and leadership roles in various political and social institutions. previous elections between 2005 and 2015. There is sufficient evidence to support the assertion that women have potentials, which can be The research report has been ready at the right time as processes for candidate nominations are tapped to meaningfully enhance social, economic and political development of nations. This about to start. It is a useful and relevant document to all stakeholders involved in the election awareness has led to efforts by governments complemented by civil society organizations processes. Female aspirants and candidates, political parties, CSOs, government entities, UN (CSOs), non-governmental organizations (NGOs), multilateral institutions and individuals at Agencies and development partners and other stakeholders are encouraged to read and use the the micro, meso and macro levels to actualize these potentials. information provided to improve on the strategies that gear towards increasing women’s participation as aspirants, candidates, and voters and as election workers in the 2017 elections. Efforts by recognized groups and entities have, in some instances, yielded positive results, there is still much to be done to ensure that women in fact, contribute their skills and talents to the NEC would like to thank Cllr Mamaka Bility, the Lead Gender Consultant and the research team political, social and economic enhancement of their nations and communities. This is because who conducted the research; all political parties and other organizations for the time and figures available with regard to the number of women in politics and public offices are still below valuable information provided to the research team; NEC staff for the valuable support provided expectation. The expectation can be achieved through a variety of identified means. However, if to the research team; organizations and individuals involved in the different stages and processes efforts to address the problem of women’s participation in politics and elections are to be of the research. In particular, special thanks should go to UNDP Election Project for the technical successful, then there is the need for factual information and empirical evidence about current and financial support, The Swedish Embassy and The European Union, for the financial support. trends of participation in terms of numbers and impact. This will help focus and develop a Last but not least, The National Elections Commission would like to extend appreciation to all systematic approach towards addressing the problem of underrepresentation of women with a whose names were not mentioned, but directly or indirectly contributed to the success of view of taken affirmative measure to leverage women’s potential and contribution to leadership production of the research report. roles in society. It is against this backdrop that this study examines the participation and eminent presence of women not only in politics specifically but also in elected offices in general due to their semeiotic relationship to the body politic. This will enable key stakeholders like political parties, government and state institutions and agencies and other civil society groups to know the “reality on the ground” and act appropriately to address the identified problems. 2. Background Owing to the dearth of crucial documents to detail the trend of women’s participation in elections in Liberia as well as to determine the level of women’s participation in political parties, this study was initiated to provide high quality and reliable source of information to the National Elections Commission in order to effectively respond to critical issues of women’s participation in elections as candidates. It is envisioned that the document will be used by the various sections in RESEARCH ON WOMEN’S PARTICIPATION AS CANDIDATES IN ELECTIONS iii RESEARCH ON WOMEN’S PARTICIPATION AS CANDIDATES IN ELECTIONS 1 the NEC, MOGCSP, political parties and other working groups as a baseline for their work to 2.4 Data Collection Methods promote women’s participation. It is a guide in working to increase women’s participation, a credible, reliable evident base for information, as well as targeted policymaking and The main data collection methods will be secondary data including questionnaires. The programming for equitable gender outcomes in elections and politics. application of this method is discussed independently for the sake of clarity. Research Objective 2.5 Secondary Data The overall objective of this research is to determine how female candidates participated in the Secondary data already exist and were collected for some other purposes, but will be used in general and presidential elections from 2005 to 2015. More specifically to: current research project retrospectively (Kothari, 2004). One of the basic advantages of using • Identify the counties in which women candidate contested; secondary data is that it helps the researcher to save time and money. If the information that • Determine whether they participated as individual or through a political party; answers the research questions already exists, it is a waste of time and resources to recollect • Determine whether or not the candidate won during the elections; and existing data for the sake of citing primary data sources. Secondary data used in this work will • Identify the position the candidates contested. include both published and non-published materials in the NEC archives. The former are different
Recommended publications
  • Adult Authority, Social Conflict, and Youth Survival Strategies in Post Civil War Liberia
    ‘Listen, Politics is not for Children:’ Adult Authority, Social Conflict, and Youth Survival Strategies in Post Civil War Liberia. DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Henryatta Louise Ballah Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2012 Dissertation Committee: Drs. Ousman Kobo, Advisor Antoinette Errante Ahmad Sikianga i Copyright by Henryatta Louise Ballah 2012 ii Abstract This dissertation explores the historical causes of the Liberian civil war (1989- 2003), with a keen attention to the history of Liberian youth, since the beginning of the Republic in 1847. I carefully analyzed youth engagements in social and political change throughout the country’s history, including the ways by which the civil war impacted the youth and inspired them to create new social and economic spaces for themselves. As will be demonstrated in various chapters, despite their marginalization by the state, the youth have played a crucial role in the quest for democratization in the country, especially since the 1960s. I place my analysis of the youth in deep societal structures related to Liberia’s colonial past and neo-colonial status, as well as the impact of external factors, such as the financial and military support the regime of Samuel Doe received from the United States during the cold war and the influence of other African nations. I emphasize that the socio-economic and political policies implemented by the Americo- Liberians (freed slaves from the U.S.) who settled in the country beginning in 1822, helped lay the foundation for the civil war.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Civil Society in National Reconciliation and Peacebuilding in Liberia
    International Peace Academy The Role of Civil Society in National Reconciliation and Peacebuilding in Liberia by Augustine Toure APRIL 2002 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The International Peace Academy wishes to acknowledge the support provided by the Government of the Netherlands which made the research and publication of this study possible. ABOUT IPA’S CIVIL SOCIETY PROGRAM This report forms part of IPA’s Civil Society Project which, between 1998 and 1999, involved case studies on the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Liberia, Sierra Leone and Guinea-Bissau. IPA held a seminar, in partnership with the Organization of African Unity (OAU), in Cape Town in 1996 on “Civil Society and Conflict Management in Africa” consisting largely of civil society actors from all parts of Africa. An IPA seminar organized in partnership with the Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa (CODESRIA) in Senegal in December 1999 on “War, Peace and Reconciliation in Africa” prominently featured civil society actors from all of Africa’s sub-regions. In the current phase of its work, IPA Africa Program’s Peacebuilding in Africa project is centered around the UN community and involves individuals from civil society, policy, academic and media circles in New York. The project explores ways of strengthening the capacity of African actors with a particular focus on civil society, to contribute to peacemaking and peacebuilding in countries dealing with or emerging from conflicts. In implementing this project, IPA organizes a series of policy fora and Civil Society Dialogues. In 2001, IPA initiated the Ruth Forbes Young fellowship to bring one civil society representative from Africa to spend a year in New York.
    [Show full text]
  • The Standard Bearer Madam Ellen Johnson Sirleaf at Unity Party (UP) National Convention
    Remarks By: The Standard Bearer Madam Ellen Johnson Sirleaf at Unity Party (UP) National Convention Gbarnga, Bong County July 7, 2016 Mr. Vice President Mr. Chairman and Members of the National Executive Committee Visiting Guests from the ANC-South Africa Invited Political Parties Fellow Partisans Civil Society Organizations Members of the Press Ladies and gentlemen We are present here today, looking forward to tomorrow’s event that will go down in the annals of history as we witness the passing of the torch. The history and formation of Unity Party is rich. Old Unity and New Unity have all combined to give us a good history, a history of hills and valleys, failures and successes, sorrows and joys. Where we were yesterday, when Gabriel Kpolleh formed the Liberia Unification Party (UP); Jackson Doe, the Liberia Action Party (LAP) and Jabaru Carlon, Joseph Koffa and Edward B Kesselly, the Unity Party (UP). It was over three decades ago and it seems like just yester years. In 1997, as the first post war elections were held to herald peace, Unity Party and Liberia Unification Party combined effort along with other- broadminded nationalists who to came together to make us runners up in the elections of 1997. Fellow partisans, we came close to the finish lines in spite of the odds of war because of courage and conviction of our leaders and the people who were united behind a cause. We did not have much money but what we boasted of then and now was the commitment to see democracy at the ballot box.
    [Show full text]
  • Members of the House of Senate January 2020
    Members of the House of Senate January 2020 NO Senator County Email Political Affiliation 1 Sen. Albert Tugbe Chie Grand Kru [email protected] Coalition for Democratic Change 2 Sen. Saah Hardy Joseph Montserrado [email protected] Coalition for Democratic Change 3 Sen. Abraham Darius S. Dillon Montserrado [email protected] Liberty Party 4 Sen. Nyonblee K. Lawrence Grand Bassa [email protected] Liberty Party 5 Sen. Jonathan Lambort Kaipay Grand Bassa [email protected] Liberty Party 6 Sen. Augustine Sarkwadae Chea Sinoe n/a Coalition for Democratic Change 7 Sen. Juojulue Milton Teahjay Sinoe [email protected] Coalition for Democratic Change 8 Sen. H. Dan Morais Maryland [email protected] National Patriotic Party / CDC 9 Sen. J. Gbleh-bo-Brown Maryland [email protected] Independent 10 Sen. Varney Sherman Grand Cape [email protected] Unity Party Mount 11 Sen. Victor V. Watson Grand Cape n/a People's Unification Party Mount 12 Sen. Henry Willie Yallah Bong [email protected] Coalition for Democratic Change 13 Sen. Henrique Tokpah Bong [email protected] Independent 14 Sen. Prince Y. Johnson Nimba [email protected] National Unification and Development Party 15 Sen. Thomas S. Grupee Nimba [email protected] National Unification and Development Party 16 Sen. G. Alphonso Gaye Grand Gedeh [email protected] Unity Party 17 Sen. A. Marshall Dennis Grand Gedeh [email protected] Coalition for Democratic Change 18 Sen. George Tamba Tengbeh Lofa [email protected] Unity Party 19 Sen. Stephen J. H. Zargo Lofa [email protected] Liberty Party 20 Sen. Sando Dazoe Johnson Bomi [email protected] National Patriotic Party / CDC 21 Sen.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberia - Researched and Compiled by the Refugee Documentation Centre of Ireland on 14 October 2010
    Liberia - Researched and compiled by the Refugee Documentation Centre of Ireland on 14 October 2010 Information on the National Patriotic Front of Liberia including activities In July 1999 a paper published by Writenet states: “Taylor’s National Patriotic Front of Liberia (NPFL) became the National Patriotic Party (NPP); Kromah’s ULIMO became the All Liberian Coalition Party (ALCOP), while George Boley lined up behind the late President Doe’s (his kinsman) National Democratic Party of Liberia (NDPL).” (Writenet (1 July 1999) Liberia, Can Peace Be Consolidated?,p.17) A publication in April 2006 by the United Kingdom Office includes the following outlines organisations: “National Patriotic Front of Liberia (NPFL) Formed in 1989, it began the civil war under the leadership of Charles Taylor, with an invasion into Nimba county that led to its control of large parts of Liberia. It acquired largely Gio and Mano support. Between 1990 and 1994, it controlled much of Liberian territory, but ceased to be active in January 1997. In 1990, a substantial faction of the NPFL split from Taylor, forming the Independent National Patriotic Front of Liberia, but this group collapsed in 1992… National Patriotic Party (NPP) Was led by Charles Taylor. Founded 1997 from the former armed faction the National Patriotic Front of Liberia; won the majority of seats in legislative elections in July 1997. Leader Roland Chris Yarkpah Massaquoi.” (United Kingdom (April 2006) Country of Origin Information Report, Liberia,p.55) A report by the Danish Immigration Service in January 1999 states: “The elections, both presidential and parliamentary, were held a few months behind schedule, on 19 July 1997.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Santa Barbara UC Santa Barbara Previously Published Works
    UC Santa Barbara UC Santa Barbara Previously Published Works Title HAS LIBERIA TURNED A CORNER? Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4394423f Journal JOURNAL OF DEMOCRACY, 29(3) ISSN 1045-5736 Authors Spatz, Benjamin J Thaler, Kai M Publication Date 2018-07-01 DOI 10.1353/jod.2018.0052 License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 4.0 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Has Liberia Turned a Corner? Benjamin J. Spatz, Kai M. Thaler Journal of Democracy, Volume 29, Number 3, July 2018, pp. 156-170 (Article) Published by Johns Hopkins University Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2018.0052 For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/698925 No institutional affiliation (16 Jul 2018 18:21 GMT) HAS LIBERIA TURNED A CORNER? Benjamin J. Spatz and Kai M. Thaler Benjamin J. Spatz is a doctoral candidate at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University and a Jennings Randolph Peace Scholar at the U.S. Institute of Peace. He has worked on Liberia since 2005, including serving on the UN Panel of Experts on Liberia during 2012–15. Kai M. Thaler is assistant professor of global studies at the University of California, Santa Barbara. The January 2018 inauguration of Liberia’s newly elected president George Weah marked the small West African country’s first transfer of power between democratically elected leaders since its founding 171 years earlier. After an electoral process marred by charges of irregularities and court-ordered delays, Weah’s clear runoff victory was followed rapidly by the concession of his opponent, Unity Party (UP) candidate and incum- bent vice-president Joseph Boakai.
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles Was Part of the Transitional Government from 2003–2006
    other war-affected and victims of sexual violence receive US$80. The september – Bio is struck on the head with a rock during a visit to EITI board renews Sierra Leone’s Candidate status, setting a new Bo, Sierra Leone’s second city. Several APC buildings are torched validation deadline of 9 December 2012. in retaliation and violence breaks out between rival SLPP and APC supporters. A temporary ban on political rallies is imposed. The UN August – SLPP selects the former head of the NPRC government, Security Council renews the UNIPSIL mandate for a further year with Julius Maada Bio, as its candidate for 2012 presidential elections. specific instructions to provide assistance during 2012 elections. Bio, popular in parts of the south and east, is criticised by opposition figures for alleged past abuses and his involvement in the 1992 coup. World Bank and UN official, Sirleaf first stood for election in 1997 and Profiles was part of the transitional government from 2003–2006. She was appointed President in elections in 2005. In her first year Sirleaf enacted a series of reforms aimed at fighting corruption and improving financial National accountability. She successfully lobbied the UN to lift sanctions and secured major debt relief from the World Bank. Sirleaf has faced Liberia criticisms domestically, most notably her slow implementation of recommendations made by the Truth and Reconciliation Commission Charles Taylor (TRC), which controversially recommended that she be barred from Charles Taylor was leader of the National Patriotic Front of Liberia public office. Her decision to contest 2011 presidential elections (NPFL) rebel group that invaded Liberia in 1989, sparking years of civil broke her earlier promise to stand down after one term in office.
    [Show full text]
  • The CPP Framework
    Final Collaborative Framework Document Four Collaborating Political Parties (Unity Party, Liberty Party, Alternative National Congress and All Liberian Party) Republic of Liberia April 25, 2020 the ststyled: the Collaborating of Political Parties (CPP). PREAMBLE We, the Members of the Collaborating Political Parties (All Liberian Party, Alternative National Congress, Liberty Party and Unity Party): Recognizing that there is strength in unity and oneness of purpose; Knowing that with the grace and guidance of God, our Creator and with the support of the Liberian people we can harness our peace through a solid democratic foundation that will curtail all forms of corruption, injustices, marginalization, suppression and oppression; Convinced that our coming together will fulfill the Liberian people’s long-awaited alternative to democratic governance anchored on the provision of basic social services to our people; Have resolved as follows: That the four independent collaborating political parties have agreed to form an Alliance to be named and styled the Collaborating Political Parties with the acronym CPP. 2 ARTICLE 1: Guiding Principles The guiding principles of the Alliance shall include but not limited to: Section 1.1 Create an environment in which each constituent political party shall feel secured politically, socially and economically through the tenets of democracy including the rule of law; Section 1.2 Create a formidable political organization at all times and period in the history of Liberia; Section 1.3 Advance causes of common
    [Show full text]
  • 2002 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor March 31, 2003
    Liberia Page 1 of 17 Liberia Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2002 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor March 31, 2003 Liberia is a centralized republic dominated by a strong presidency. The Constitution provides for three branches of government, but there was no effective system of checks and balances, and presidents traditionally have wielded extraordinary power. Charles G. Taylor, who is of both indigenous and Americo-Liberian ancestry, has led the Government since 1996, when forces under his command emerged dominant after a 7-year civil war. President Taylor used intimidation, patronage, and corruption to maintain power. In 1997 Taylor won the presidential election, and his National Patriotic Party (NPP) won three-quarters of the seats in the legislature. The elections were administratively free and transparent, but were conducted in an atmosphere of intimidation, because most voters believed that Taylor's forces would have resumed fighting if he had lost. Other leaders of the former warring factions subsequently left the country. From February 8 until September 14, the Government operated under a state of emergency that suspended some civil liberties such as peaceful assembly in response to the armed insurgency of a rebel group, Liberians United for Reconciliation and Democracy (LURD). The Government used the provisions of the state of emergency to stop all support for rebel goals, real or imagined. The bicameral legislature exercised little independence from the executive branch. The judiciary was
    [Show full text]
  • Country Advice Liberia
    Country Advice Liberia Liberia – LBR36800 – National Patriotic Party (NPP) – National Patriotic Front of Liberia (NPFL) – Independent National Patriotic Front of Liberia (INPFL) 9 June 2010 1. Deleted. 2. Please provide information about the NPP the NPFL and INPFL and their current status. The National Patriotic Party (NPP) The National Patriotic Party (NPP) is currently active in Liberian politics with four members in the country‟s House of Representatives and three in the Senate. In Presidential elections in 2005, the NPP candidate Roland Massaquoi was placed sixth with 4.1% of the vote.1 The NPP was the political wing of the National Patriotic Front of Liberia (NPFL), the rebel force led by Charles Taylor. First emerging in 19912, it became a legally registered political party in 1997 after the NPFL‟s military wing was dissolved as part of a 1996 peace pact.3 In the Liberian elections of July 1997, the Taylor-led NPP was successful. Taylor was elected President and the (NPP) gained 21 of the 26 seats in the Senate and 49 of the 64 in the House of Representatives.4 When Taylor departed from Liberia in August 2003 many NPP members remained loyal to him, while others decided to join other parties.5 The National Patriotic Front of Liberia (NPFL) The NPFL was officially dissolved in January 1997. The NPFL emerged in 1989 as a rebel force of 150 led by Charles Taylor in Liberia‟s north-eastern border region. The rebels confronted the reigning National Democratic Party of Liberia (NDPL) led by Samuel Doe and the Liberian Army, gaining control of rural areas and by mid-1990 were present in the capital Monrovia.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Parties and Democratic Development in Ghana: from Transition to Consolidation and Beyond
    POLITICAL PARTIES AND DEMOCRATIC DEVELOPMENT IN GHANA: FROM TRANSITION TO CONSOLIDATION AND BEYOND By NICK FOBIH A thesis submitted to the Department of Political Studies in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Queen’s University Kinston, Ontario, Canada April 2008 Copyright © Nick Fobih, 2008 Abstract At the time of the Ghana’s independence in March 1957, a democratic system of government was instituted, but the process of political development was derailed and often interrupted by frequent coups. This is evident in the interchange of military and civilian regimes in the last fifty-one years. While in the post-independence era, the development of democracy, the party system and democratic institutions in Ghana has taken many twists and turns due to the persistent military interventions in politics, as part of the third-wave of democratization, in 1992, under Ghana’s Fourth Republic, a new democratic system was re-introduced in the country under the National Democratic Congress (NDC) government. The opening of political spaces for the political parties and civil society organizations in the last two decades has witnessed the resurgence of political parties of different sizes and ideological orientation under various political traditions, which has led to the strengthening of Ghana’s party system. This, in turn, has immensely facilitated the country’s democratic development, which was evidenced in the 2000 power alternation that led to the election of the New Patriotic Party (NPP) to power. Since the emergence of the third-wave of democratization, there have been numerous theoretical approaches by democratic transition and consolidation theorists on the role of political parties in the nurturing and consolidation of democracy in the third-wave countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberia 2005: an Unusual African Post-Conflict Election
    J. of Modern African Studies, 44, 3 (2006), pp. 375–395. f 2006 Cambridge University Press doi:10.1017/S0022278X06001819 Printed in the United Kingdom Liberia 2005: an unusual African post-con£ict election David Harris* ABSTRACT The 2003 Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) and the ensuing two-year- long National Transitional Government of Liberia (NTGL), which brought together two rebel forces, the former government and members of civil society, justifiably had many critics but also one positive and possibly redeeming feature. In spite of, or perhaps because of, the realpolitik nature of the CPA and the barely disguised gross corruption of the members of the coalition government, the protagonists in the second Liberian civil war (2000–03) complied with the agreement and the peace process held. The culmination of this sequence of events was the 11 October 2005 national elections, the 8 November presidential run-off and the 16 January 2006 inauguration. In several ways, this was the African post-conflict election that broke the mould, but not just in that a woman, Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf, won the presidential race, and a football star, George Weah, came second. The virtual absence of transformed rebel forces or an overbearing incumbent in the electoral races, partially as a result of the CPA and NTGL, gave these polls extraordinary features in an African setting. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND After fifteen years of post-Cold War post-conflict African elections, it can now be said that some patterns are emerging, except that Liberia appears to have upset one or two of these rhythms. In some ways, the 2005 Liberian polls emerged firmly against general African electoral precedents – including those of the 1997 Liberian election, which ushered in the rule of the former ‘warlord’, Charles Taylor (Harris 1999).
    [Show full text]