Optogentic Neuromodulation in Animal Models Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Optogentic Neuromodulation in Animal Models Of Optogenetic Neuromodulation in a Rodent Model of Depression Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde der Fakultät für Biologie der Albert–Ludwigs–Universität Freiburg im Breisgau vorgelegt von Lisa-Marie Pfeiffer aus Kassel Freiburg im Breisgau September 2019 Angefertigt in der Abteilung für Stereotaktische und Funktionelle Neurochirur- gie des Universitätsklinikums Freiburg unter der Leitung von Prof. Dr. med. Volker A. Coenen und PD Dr. Máté D. Döbrössy. Dekan der Fakultät für Biologie: Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Driever Promotionsvorsitzender: Prof. Dr. Andreas Hiltbrunner Betreuer der Arbeit: Prof. Dr. med. Volker A. Coenen Betreuer der biologischen Fakultät: Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Driever Referent: Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Driever Koreferentin: Prof. Dr. Ilka Diester Drittprüferin: Prof. Dr. Carola Haas Datum der mündlichen Prüfung: 28.11.2019 To Mom and Dad. “Rabbit’s clever," said Pooh thoughtfully. "Yes," said Piglet, "Rabbit’s clever." "And he has Brain." "Yes," said Piglet, "Rabbit has Brain." There was a long silence. "I suppose," said Pooh, "that that’s why he never understands anything.” — A.A. Milne, Winnie-the-Pooh I Contents Contents List of TablesVI List of Figures VII ErklärungIX AbstractX Deutsche Zusammenfassung XII 1 Introduction1 1.1 Neuromodulation in psychiatric diseases . .1 1.2 Major Depression . .2 1.2.1 The Neurobiology of Depression . .3 1.2.1.1 (Epi-) Genetics and Environmental Factors . .4 1.2.1.2 Monoamine Deficiency Theory . .5 1.2.1.3 Stress Hypothesis . .6 1.2.1.4 Dysbalanced Neurotrophins and Neurogenesis . .7 1.2.1.5 Inflammation Theory . .8 1.2.1.6 Gut Microbiota Theory . .8 1.2.1.7 Dysregulation of the Reward Circuitry . .9 1.2.2 The Neuroanatomy of the Reward Circuitry . 12 1.2.3 Therapy for Major Depression . 14 1.2.3.1 Pharmacotherapy . 15 1.2.3.2 Psychotherapy . 17 1.2.3.3 Electroconvulsive Therapy . 17 1.2.3.4 Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation . 18 1.2.3.5 Vagus Nerve Stimulation . 18 1.2.3.6 Deep Brain Stimulation . 18 1.3 Animal models of Depression . 20 1.3.1 The Chronic Mild Unpredictable Stress Protocol . 20 1.3.2 Learned Helplessness . 21 1.3.3 Early Life Stress . 21 1.3.4 Olfactory Bulbectomy . 22 1.3.5 Genetically Modified Rodents . 22 1.3.6 Selectively Bred Animals - The Flinder’s Sensitive Line Rat . 24 II Contents 1.3.7 Testing Depressive-like Phenotype . 26 1.3.7.1 Forced Swim and Tail Suspension Test . 26 1.3.7.2 Open-space Swimming Test . 26 1.3.7.3 Sucrose Preference Test . 27 1.3.7.4 Others . 27 1.4 Optogenetics . 28 1.4.1 Microbial Opsins . 28 1.4.2 Opsin Targeting Strategies . 30 1.4.2.1 Targeting with Viruses . 30 1.4.2.2 Projection Targeting . 31 1.4.2.3 Transgenic Animal Targeting . 31 1.4.2.4 The Long Evans TH::Cre Rat and the Cre/loxP Re- combination System . 32 1.4.3 Light Delivery . 34 1.4.3.1 Light Requirements . 34 1.4.3.2 Light Sources . 35 1.4.3.3 Optical Properties of Brain Tissue . 36 1.4.4 Validation/Readouts . 37 1.4.5 Optogenetics and Major Depression . 38 2 Aims 41 3 Materials and Methods 42 3.1 Chemicals and Equipment . 42 3.1.1 Solutions for Immunohistochemistry . 42 3.1.2 Antibodies . 43 3.1.3 Substances Applied to the Animals . 43 3.1.4 Viruses for Optogenetics . 44 3.1.5 Kits used for Molecular Analysis . 44 3.1.6 Primer . 45 3.1.7 Mastermix for PCR........................ 45 3.2 Animals . 46 3.2.1 Breeding and Genotyping of Long EvansTH::Cre Rats . 46 3.3 Establishment of the Virus Injection . 48 3.3.1 Stereotactic Surgery - Virus Injection . 48 3.3.2 Immunohistochemistry . 50 3.3.2.1 Transcardial Perfusion . 51 III Contents 3.3.2.2 Immunofluorescent Stainings . 51 3.3.2.3 Microscopical Analysis - Epifluorescent Microscopy . 52 3.4 Behavioural Characterization of Long Evans vs. Sprague Dawley Rats 52 3.4.1 Sucrose Preference Test . 53 3.4.2 Ultrasonic Vocalization . 53 3.4.3 Double-H Maze . 53 3.4.4 Forced Swim Test . 55 3.4.5 Elevated Plus Maze . 56 3.4.6 Open Field Test . 56 3.5 Establishment of the Chronic Mild Unpredictable Stress Protocol . 57 3.5.1 Weight Measurements . 59 3.5.2 Corticosterone Measurements . 60 3.5.3 Sucrose Preference Test - New Protocol . 62 3.5.4 Social Interaction Test . 62 3.5.5 Object Recognition Test . 64 3.6 Optogenetic Stimulation of the Medial Forebrain Bundle in the Flinder’s Sensitive Line Rat Depression Model - 6-OHDA Lesioned vs. Unle- sioned Rats . 64 3.6.1 Stereotactic Surgery - 6-OHDA-Lesion . 65 3.6.2 Stereotactic Surgery - Virus Injection and Cannula Implantation 66 3.6.3 Laser Set Up and Light Parameters . 67 3.6.4 Behaviour Testing . 68 3.6.4.1 Activity measurements . 68 3.6.5 Immunohistochemistry . 68 3.6.6 Microscopical Analysis . 69 3.7 Dopamine-specific Optogenetic Stimulation of the Medial Forebrain Bundle in a Stress-induced Rat Depression Model . 70 3.7.1 Stereotactic Surgery - Virus Injection and Cannula Implantation 71 3.7.2 Chronic Mild Unpredictable Stress (CMUS) Protocol . 71 3.7.3 Behaviour Testing . 74 3.7.3.1 Open Space Swimming Test . 74 3.7.4 Immunohistochemistry and Microscopy . 75 3.8 Final Analysis and Statistics . 75 4 Results 76 4.1 Establishment of the Virus Injection . 76 IV Contents 4.2 Behavioural Characterization of Long Evans vs. Sprague Dawley Rats 78 4.2.1LE andSD Rats Differ in Weight But Not in Weight Growth Dynamics . 78 4.2.2SD Rats Show a Decreased Exploratory Behaviour Compared toLERats ............................ 80 4.2.3SD Rats Show Deficits in Spatial Learning Compared toLE Rats . 82 4.2.4 No Strain and Gender Differences are Detected in EPM and FST................................ 84 4.2.5 Sucrose Preference is Equally Pronounced in Both Strains . 86 4.2.6LE Males Emit Less Calls in the High Band Compared toSD Males . 87 4.3 Establishment of the CMUS Protocol . 88 4.3.1 CMUS Had no Significant Effect on the Weight of the Animals 89 4.3.2 Levels of FCM Increased Significantly in Both Groups After CMUS............................... 89 4.3.3 CMUS Did Not Have an Effect on the Rats Performance in EPM, SPT,OF, SIT, FST and USV.............. 90 4.3.4 Rats That Underwent CMUS Spent Significantly Less Time with Novel Objects . 93 4.4 Optogenetic Stimulation of the Medial Forebrain Bundle in the Flinder’s Sensitive Line Rat Depression Model - 6-OHDA Lesioned vs. Unle- sioned Rats . 94 4.4.1 Mean Transfection Rate of VTA DA neurons Was Low . 95 4.4.2 Amphetamine-induced Activity Was Decreased in Lesioned Rats 97 4.4.3 Optogenetic Stimulation Increased Homecage-Activity . 98 4.4.4 Testing of a Depressive-like Phenotype Did Not Show Signi- ficant Differences Between Groups . 99 4.4.5 Social Behaviour as Measured in the social interaction test (SIT) Did Not Differ Between Groups . 100 4.4.6 No Differences Were Seen in the Animals’ Exploratory Behaviour102 4.5 Dopamine-specific Optogenetic Stimulation of the Medial Forebrain Bundle in a Stress-induced Rat Depression Model . 102 4.5.1 The Applied Virus Injection Parameters Led to a Transfection Rate of over 50 % . 103 V Contents 4.5.2 The Weight Development in Stressed Animals Was Slightly Decreased . 105 4.5.3 Corticosterone Levels Decreased over the Length of the Ex- periment . 105 4.5.4 Optogenetic Stimulation Did not Lead to an Increase in Home- Cage-Activity . 106 4.5.5 Anxiety-Behaviour was Decreased in dopamine (DA)-Stim An- imals . 107 4.5.6 DA-Stim Rats Spent Less Time in the Center Zone of theOF Compared to CTRL Rats . 107 4.5.7 Social Behaviour is Increased in DA-Stim Rats . 108 4.5.8 Stimulation Rescued the Depressive-like Phenotype in the OSST109 4.5.9 Immobility, Sucrose Consumption and USVs Did Not Differ Between Groups . 110 5 Discussion 113 5.1 Establishment of optogenetics . 114 5.2 The Long Evans TH::Cre Rat . 117 5.3 The CMUS Protocol . 118 5.4 Optogenetic Stimulation of the MFB in the FSL Depression Model - 6-OHDA Lesioned vs. Unlesioned Rats . 120 5.4.1 The FSL rat . 120 5.4.2 Optogenetic Stimulation of the MFB in the FSL Depression Model - Discussion of Results . 121 5.5 DA-specific Optogenetic Stimulation of the MFB in the CMUS-induced Depression Model . 123 5.6 Conclusions . 129 5.6.1 Potential Mechanism of Action of the Optogenetic Stimulation of the MFB . 129 5.7 Outlook . 131 5.7.1 Application of Optogenetics in Humans . 132 Bibliography 134 Acknowledgements 171 List of Publications 173 VI List of Tables List of Tables 1.1 Diagnostic Criteria for Major Depression . .3 1.2 Selectively Bred Depression Models . 25 1.3 Viral Promoters in AAVs for Specific Optogenetic Targeting . 31 1.4 Optogenetic studies in Depression . 40 3.1 Solutions for Histology . 42 3.2 Primary Antibodies . 43 3.3 Secondary Antibodies . 43 3.4 Substances Applied to the Animals . 44 3.5 Viruses for Optogenetics . 44 3.6 Kits for Molecular Analysis.
Recommended publications
  • Neural Dust: Ultrasonic Biological Interface
    Neural Dust: Ultrasonic Biological Interface Dongjin (DJ) Seo Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences University of California at Berkeley Technical Report No. UCB/EECS-2018-146 http://www2.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2018/EECS-2018-146.html December 1, 2018 Copyright © 2018, by the author(s). All rights reserved. Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. To copy otherwise, to republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission. Neural Dust: Ultrasonic Biological Interface by Dongjin Seo A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Engineering - Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Michel M. Maharbiz, Chair Professor Elad Alon Professor John Ngai Fall 2016 Neural Dust: Ultrasonic Biological Interface Copyright 2016 by Dongjin Seo 1 Abstract Neural Dust: Ultrasonic Biological Interface by Dongjin Seo Doctor of Philosophy in Engineering - Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences University of California, Berkeley Professor Michel M. Maharbiz, Chair A seamless, high density, chronic interface to the nervous system is essential to enable clinically relevant applications such as electroceuticals or brain-machine interfaces (BMI). Currently, a major hurdle in neurotechnology is the lack of an implantable neural interface system that remains viable for a patient's lifetime due to the development of biological response near the implant.
    [Show full text]
  • Perceiving Invisible Light Through a Somatosensory Cortical Prosthesis
    ARTICLE Received 24 Aug 2012 | Accepted 15 Jan 2013 | Published 12 Feb 2013 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2497 Perceiving invisible light through a somatosensory cortical prosthesis Eric E. Thomson1,2, Rafael Carra1,w & Miguel A.L. Nicolelis1,2,3,4,5 Sensory neuroprostheses show great potential for alleviating major sensory deficits. It is not known, however, whether such devices can augment the subject’s normal perceptual range. Here we show that adult rats can learn to perceive otherwise invisible infrared light through a neuroprosthesis that couples the output of a head-mounted infrared sensor to their soma- tosensory cortex (S1) via intracortical microstimulation. Rats readily learn to use this new information source, and generate active exploratory strategies to discriminate among infrared signals in their environment. S1 neurons in these infrared-perceiving rats respond to both whisker deflection and intracortical microstimulation, suggesting that the infrared repre- sentation does not displace the original tactile representation. Hence, sensory cortical prostheses, in addition to restoring normal neurological functions, may serve to expand natural perceptual capabilities in mammals. 1 Department of Neurobiology, Duke University, Box 3209, 311 Research Drive, Bryan Research, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA. 2 Edmond and Lily Safra International Institute for Neuroscience of Natal (ELS-IINN), Natal 01257050, Brazil. 3 Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA. 4 Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA. 5 Center for Neuroengineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA. w Present address: University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, Sao Paulo 01246-000, Brazil. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to M.A.L.N.
    [Show full text]
  • Optogenetics Controlling Neurons with Photons
    Valerie C. Coffey Optogenetics Controlling Neurons with Photons An advancing field of neuroscience uses light to understand how the brain works and to create new tools to treat disease. Wireless optogenetics tools like these tiny implants in live mice are enabling scientists to map the stimulation of certain neurons of the brain to specific responses. J. Rogers/Northwestern Univ. 24 OPTICS & PHOTONICS NEWS APRIL 2018 APRIL 2018 OPTICS & PHOTONICS NEWS 25 In just over a decade, the discovery of numerous opsins with different specializations has allowed scientists and engineers to make rapid progress in mapping brain activity. wo thousand years ago, ancient Egyptians halorhodopsin can silence the neurons in the hypo- knew that the electrical shocks of torpedo thalamus, inducing sleep in living mice. fish, applied to the body, could offer pain In just over a decade, the discovery of numerous relief. Two hundred years ago, physicians opsins with different specializations has allowed scien- understood that electrical stimulation of a tists and engineers to make rapid progress in mapping Tfrog’s spine could control muscle contraction. Today, brain activity, motivated by the hope of solving intrac- electrical therapy underlies many treatments, from table neurological conditions. And it doesn’t hurt that pacemakers to pain control. investment in neuroscience research has grown at the But neuroscience has long awaited a more precise same time. tool for controlling specific types of neurons. Electrical In 2013, the Obama administration announced a stimulation (e-stim) approaches stimulate a large area collaborative public-private effort, the Brain Research without precise spatial control, and can’t distinguish through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies between different cell types.
    [Show full text]
  • Computational Neuroscience Meets Optogenetics: Unlocking the Brain’S Secrets
    Health & Medicine ︱ Prof Simon Schultz and Dr Konstantin Nikolic Computational neuroscience meets optogenetics: Unlocking the brain’s secrets Working at the interface omposed of billions of specialised responsible for perception, action Simplified models allow researchers to study how the geometry of a neuron’s “dendritic tree” affects its ability to process information. between engineering and nerve cells (called neurons) wired and memory. But this is changing. neuroscience, Professor Simon C together in complex, intricate Schultz and Dr Konstantin webs, the brain is inherently challenging LET THERE BE LIGHT Nikolic at Imperial College to study. Neurons communicate with A powerful new tool (invented by Boyden of Neurotechnology and Director of SHEDDING LIGHT ON THE BRAIN AN INSIGHT INTO NEURONAL GAIN London are developing tools each other by transmitting electrical and and Deisseroth just a little over a decade the Imperial Centre of Excellence in Their innovative approach uses Using two biophysical models of to help us understand the chemical signals along neural circuits: ago) allows researchers to map the brain’s Neurotechnology, Dr Konstantin Nikolic, sophisticated two-photon microscopy, neurons, genetically-modified to include intricate workings of the brain. signals that vary both in space and time. connections, giving unprecedented Associate Professor in the Department optogenetics and electrophysiology two distinct light-sensitive proteins Combining a revolutionary Until now, technical limitations in the access to the workings of the brain. Its of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, to measure (and disturb) patterns of (called opsins): channelrhodopsin-2 technology – optogenetics available research methods to study the impressive resolution enables precise and Dr Sarah Jarvis are taking a unique neuronal activity in vivo (in living tissue).
    [Show full text]
  • Mousecircuits.Org: an Online Repository to Guide the Circuit Era of Disordered Affect
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.16.951608; this version posted February 17, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. MouseCircuits.org: An online repository to guide the circuit era of disordered affect Kristin R. Anderson ID 1,2 and Dani Dumitriu ID 1,2 1Columbia University, Departments of Pediatrics and Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10032 2Columbia University, Zuckerman Institute, 3227 Broadway, New York, NY 10027 Affective disorders rank amongst the most disruptive and tem and the gut microbiome (2,3). However, the mysteries of prevalent psychiatric diseases, resulting in enormous societal the brain, a structure with idiosyncratic and interconnected and economic burden, and immeasurable personal costs. Novel architecture, are unlikely to be revealed solely on the basis of therapies are urgently needed but have remained elusive. The this type of sledgehammer approach. era of circuit-mapping in rodent models of disordered affect, ushered in by recent technological advancements allowing for Enter the era of circuit dissection. In the last precise and specific neural control, has reenergized the hope for decade, groundbreaking technological advances have al- precision psychiatry. Here, we present a novel whole-brain cu- lowed neuroscientists to take control of neural firing with mulative network and critically access the progress made to- impressive precision and specificity (Figure 1) (4–7).
    [Show full text]
  • An Embedded Real-Time Processing Platform for Optogenetic Neuroprosthetic Applications
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL SYSTEMS AND REHABILITATION ENGINEERING, VOL. 26, NO. 1, JANUARY 2018 233 An Embedded Real-Time Processing Platform for Optogenetic Neuroprosthetic Applications Boyuan Yan and Sheila Nirenberg Abstract— Optogenetics offers a powerful new approach temporal resolution. Since these proteins require bright for controlling neural circuits. It has numerous applica- light [23], [24], standard high resolution devices such as LCD tions in both basic and clinical science. These applications monitors are ineffective. While laser or LED-based illumi- require stimulating devices with small processors that can perform real-time neural signal processing, deliver high- nation systems can meet the requirements of light intensity, intensity light with high spatial and temporal resolution, they are not readily suitable for providing spatially-patterned and do not consume a lot of power. In this paper, we stimuli. Digital light processing (DLP) projectors, however demonstrate the implementation of neuronal models in a can achieve this: the key component, a chip called Digital platform consisting of an embedded system module and Micromirror Device (DMD) [25], consists of an array of a portable digital light processing projector. As a replace- ment for damaged neural circuitry, the embedded module several hundred thousand micromirrors, which can change processes neural signals and then directs the projector to position at kHz frequencies. These offer the most flexibility in optogenetically activate a downstream neural pathway. We terms of the spatial and temporal modulation of the activating present a design in the context of stimulating circuits in the light. visual system, but the approach is feasible for a broad range In addition to an effective stimulator, the other essential of biomedical applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Implantable Microelectrodes on Soft Substrate with Nanostructured Active Surface for Stimulation and Recording of Brain Activities Valentina Castagnola
    Implantable microelectrodes on soft substrate with nanostructured active surface for stimulation and recording of brain activities Valentina Castagnola To cite this version: Valentina Castagnola. Implantable microelectrodes on soft substrate with nanostructured active sur- face for stimulation and recording of brain activities. Micro and nanotechnologies/Microelectronics. Universite Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, 2014. English. tel-01137352 HAL Id: tel-01137352 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01137352 Submitted on 31 Mar 2015 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. THÈSETHÈSE En vue de l’obtention du DOCTORAT DE L’UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE Délivré par : l’Université Toulouse 3 Paul Sabatier (UT3 Paul Sabatier) Présentée et soutenue le 18/12/2014 par : Valentina CASTAGNOLA Implantable Microelectrodes on Soft Substrate with Nanostructured Active Surface for Stimulation and Recording of Brain Activities JURY M. Frédéric MORANCHO Professeur d’Université Président de jury M. Blaise YVERT Directeur de recherche Rapporteur Mme Yael HANEIN Professeur d’Université Rapporteur M. Pascal MAILLEY Directeur de recherche Examinateur M. Christian BERGAUD Directeur de recherche Directeur de thèse Mme Emeline DESCAMPS Chargée de Recherche Directeur de thèse École doctorale et spécialité : GEET : Micro et Nanosystèmes Unité de Recherche : Laboratoire d’Analyse et d’Architecture des Systèmes (UPR 8001) Directeur(s) de Thèse : M.
    [Show full text]
  • Neuroprosthetics Session Abstract-FINAL
    NEUROPROTHETICS Session co-chairs: Justin Williams, University of Wisconsin, Tim Denison, Medtronic The brain has always been attractive to engineers. Neurons and their connections, like tiny circuit elements, process and transmit information in a dramatic way that is intimately curious to researchers in the computer science and engineering fields. Neurons are amazing computational devices capable of both robust response to widely varied inputs and adaptability to changing conditions. Our most advanced computing systems are still dwarfed by the computational power of the human brain. Even small groups of neurons are capable of intricate interactions that produce basic mechanisms of learning and memory, highly parallel processing and exquisite sensing capabilities. Science has made great strides in the past few decades toward uncovering the basic principles underlying the brain’s ability to receive sensation and control movement. These discoveries, along with revolutionary advances in computing power and microelectronics technology, have led to an emerging view that neural prosthetics, or electronic interfaces with the brain for restoration or augmentation of physiological function, may one day be possible. While the creation of a “six million dollar man" may still be far into the future, neural prostheses are rapidly becoming real potential treatments for a broad range of patients with injury or disease of the nervous system. This session will focus on the types of engineering technology that we use to interface with the nervous system. This includes technology for stimulating the nervous system for restoration of sensory function as well as methods for extracting motor intention from the brain for use in artificial prostheses.
    [Show full text]
  • Optogenetics Inspired Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Neuristors for In-Memory Deep Recurrent Neural Networks
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16985-0 OPEN Optogenetics inspired transition metal dichalcogenide neuristors for in-memory deep recurrent neural networks Rohit Abraham John 1, Jyotibdha Acharya2,3, Chao Zhu 1, Abhijith Surendran2, Sumon Kumar Bose 2, Apoorva Chaturvedi1, Nidhi Tiwari4, Yang Gao1, Yongmin He 1, Keke K. Zhang1, Manzhang Xu 1, ✉ ✉ Wei Lin Leong 2, Zheng Liu 1, Arindam Basu 2 & Nripan Mathews 1,4 1234567890():,; Shallow feed-forward networks are incapable of addressing complex tasks such as natural language processing that require learning of temporal signals. To address these require- ments, we need deep neuromorphic architectures with recurrent connections such as deep recurrent neural networks. However, the training of such networks demand very high pre- cision of weights, excellent conductance linearity and low write-noise- not satisfied by current memristive implementations. Inspired from optogenetics, here we report a neuromorphic computing platform comprised of photo-excitable neuristors capable of in-memory compu- tations across 980 addressable states with a high signal-to-noise ratio of 77. The large linear dynamic range, low write noise and selective excitability allows high fidelity opto-electronic transfer of weights with a two-shot write scheme, while electrical in-memory inference provides energy efficiency. This method enables implementing a memristive deep recurrent neural network with twelve trainable layers with more than a million parameters to recognize spoken commands with >90% accuracy. 1 School of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore 639798, Singapore. 2 School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore 639798, Singapore.
    [Show full text]
  • Optogenetics
    EUROSCIENCE NWINTER 2010 QUARTERLY Message from the President “Research moves If We Are Not for Science, Who Will Be for Us? nations forward, The outlook for scientific funding in the year ahead is fraught with uncertainty. On one hand, we are living through a time of gives patients hope, unparalleled scientific opportunity. On the other, we are facing deep economic stresses and unrelenting competition for limited and directly serves resources. This is a hard truth not just in America, but through- the long-term out the world. health and economic In these times, there is a demonstrable risk that science will be Michael E. Goldberg, forced to shelve or delay potentially game-changing progress. needs of all nations.” SfN President Labs could disband, or turn away the next generation’s great minds. It could mean flat or falling employment for the broader — Michael E. Goldberg, scientific enterprise — scientists, plus the technicians, machinists, administrators, and SfN President support staff who make it all possible. As an SfN member, you have potential to help change this scenario although scientists do not control the federal purse. The answer is sustained communication, advocacy, and action. To be sure, we face tough head winds and a lot of competition. But what will each one of us do today to create a world where flat funding of science is eventually IN THIS ISSUE impossible? Where every nation strongly invests in science as a force for better knowl- edge and more progress? Continued on page 2 . Message from the President ................................ 1 Inside Science: Optogenetics ................................ 1 Inside Science SfN Recognizes Leadership in Support of Research ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Shielded Coaxial Optrode Arrays for Neurophysiology
    ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 09 June 2016 doi: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00252 Shielded Coaxial Optrode Arrays for Neurophysiology Jeffrey R. Naughton 1, Timothy Connolly 2, Juan A. Varela 3, Jaclyn Lundberg 3, Michael J. Burns 1, Thomas C. Chiles 2, John P. Christianson 3 and Michael J. Naughton 1* 1 Department of Physics, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA, 2 Department of Biology, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA, 3 Department of Psychology, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA Recent progress in the study of the brain has been greatly facilitated by the development of new tools capable of minimally-invasive, robust coupling to neuronal assemblies. Two prominent examples are the microelectrode array (MEA), which enables electrical signals from large numbers of neurons to be detected and spatiotemporally correlated, and optogenetics, which enables the electrical activity of cells to be controlled with light. In the former case, high spatial density is desirable but, as electrode arrays evolve toward higher density and thus smaller pitch, electrical crosstalk increases. In the latter, finer control over light input is desirable, to enable improved studies of neuroelectronic Edited by: pathways emanating from specific cell stimulation. Here, we introduce a coaxial electrode Ramona Samba, architecture that is uniquely suited to address these issues, as it can simultaneously Natural and Medical Sciences Institute, Germany be utilized as an optical waveguide and a shielded electrode in dense arrays. Using Reviewed by: optogenetically-transfected cells on a coaxial MEA, we demonstrate the utility of the Joost Le Feber, architecture by recording cellular currents evoked from optical stimulation. We also show University of Twente, Netherlands Marco Canepari, the capability for network recording by radiating an area of seven individually-addressed Institut National de la Santé et de la coaxial electrode regions with cultured cells covering a section of the extent.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Challenges in Optogenetics Kelly A
    Current Challenges in Optogenetics Kelly A. Zalocusky, Lief E. Fenno, and Karl Deisseroth, MD, PhD Howard Hughes Medical Institute Departments of Bioengineering and Psychiatry Stanford University Stanford, California © 2013 Deisseroth Current Challenges in Optogenetics 11 Introduction NOTES Studying intact systems with simultaneous local precision and global scope is a fundamental challenge of biology, and part of the solution may be found in optogenetics. This field combines genetic and optical methods to achieve gain or loss of function of temporally defined events in specific cells embedded within intact living tissue or organisms. Such precise causal control within the functioning intact system can be achieved by introducing genes that confer to cells both light-detection capability and specific effector function. For example, microbial opsin genes can be expressed in neurons to mediate millisecond precision and reliable control of action potential firing in response to light pulses (Boyden et al., 2005; Ishizuka et al., 2006; Yizhar et al., 2011). Indeed, this approach has now been used to control neuronal activity in a wide range of animals and systems, yielding insights into fundamental aspects of physiology as well as into dysfunction and Figure 1. Single-component optogenetic tool categories. possible treatments for pathological states (Fenno and Four major classes of opsin commonly used in optogenet- Deisseroth, 2013). Many other strategies for optical ics experiments, each encompassing light sensation and effector function within a single gene, include: (1) ChRs, control (besides the microbial opsin gene approach) which are light-activated cation channels that give rise to may be applied as well (Möglich and Moffat, 2007; Wu inward (excitatory) currents under physiological conditions; et al., 2009; Airan et al., 2009; Stierl et al., 2011).
    [Show full text]