DOCSLIB.ORG

P. O. Box 41753 – 00100 GPO – Nairobi, Kenya Email: [email protected] Tel: 0202300484/5; 020397872 Mobile: +254707110179 Web: LIST of TABLES

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
P. O. Box 41753 – 00100 GPO – Nairobi, Kenya Email: Info@Acepis.Org Tel: 0202300484/5; 020397872 Mobile: +254707110179 Web: LIST of TABLES P. O. Box 41753 – 00100 GPO – Nairobi, Kenya Email: [email protected] Tel: 0202300484/5; 020397872 Mobile: +254707110179 Web: www.acepis.org LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................................................................... III LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................................................ III LIST OF ACRONYMS ....................................................................................................................................................... IV EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................................. VI 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................... 8 1.1 Background to the project ....................................................................................................................................... 8 1.2 Specific objectives of the project: ........................................................................................................................... 8 1.3 Scope of the project and targeted beneficiaries: .................................................................................................... 9 1.4 Purpose of the End of Project Evaluation (EPE) .................................................................................................. 10 2.0 METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................................................. 12 2.1 Framework for evaluation ..................................................................................................................................... 12 2.2 Approaches to data collection for the evaluation .................................................................................................. 12 2.1.1 Desk Research ................................................................................................................................................ 12 2.1.2 Primary data collection ..................................................................................................................................... 12 2.3 Sampling ............................................................................................................................................................... 13 2.4 Data Analysis ........................................................................................................................................................ 14 2.5 Ethical Considerations .......................................................................................................................................... 14 2.6 Limitations of the evaluation ................................................................................................................................. 14 3.0 KEY OUTCOMES AND LEARNING ..................................................................................................................... 17 4.0 DETAILED FINDINGS OF THE FINAL EVALUATION ......................................................................................... 23 4.1 OECD Criteria ....................................................................................................................................................... 23 4.1.1 Relevance ........................................................................................................................................................ 23 4.1.2 Effectiveness .................................................................................................................................................... 30 4.1.3 Efficiency .......................................................................................................................................................... 38 4.1.4 Sustainability .................................................................................................................................................... 41 4.2 Outcome Monitoring (Tracking outcomes based on the Log Frame) ................................................................... 46 5.0 MOST SIGNIFICANT CHANGE STORIES .......................................................................................................... 56 6.0 CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................................ 59 6.1 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................................ 59 6.2 Recommendations ................................................................................................................................................ 59 7.0 REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................................................... 61 8.0 APPENDIXES ....................................................................................................................................................... 62 Table 1: Research Approach ............................................................................................................................................ 13 Table 2: Sample and response rate .................................................................................................................................. 15 Table 3: Strategic Partnerships developed by project selected teams ............................................................................. 32 Table 4: Some coalitions/networks of WROs involved in implementation of the project in selected countries ................. 41 Table 5: Constitutional and model law reviews where Haki Mkononi partners have made significant contributions ........ 48 Table 6: Repressive laws or practices affecting women and girls repealed ..................................................................... 52 Figure 1: Background on Key implementing partners ....................................................................................................... 11 Figure 2: Levels of knowledge on various women's rights & laws - selected countries .................................................... 24 Figure 3: Religious and cultural/customary beliefs, practices and laws hindering realization of women’s rights .............. 25 Figure 4: Legal framework on abortion in Nigeria ............................................................................................................. 27 Figure 5: Legal framework on abortion in Nigeria ............................................................................................................. 27 Figure 6: Awareness of the Protocol amongst respondents in selected countries ........................................................... 34 Figure 7: Influential stakeholders in passing model laws - Kaduna, Nigeria ..................................................................... 35 Figure 8: Woman Rights Organizations engaged in the project ....................................................................................... 47 Figure 9: Local Woman Leaders engaged in the project .................................................................................................. 50 Figure 10: MSC story - Case I (Nigeria) ............................................................................................................................ 56 Figure 11: MSC story - Case II (Rwanda) ......................................................................................................................... 57 Figure 13: MSC story - Case V (Uganda) ......................................................................................................................... 58 iii AU Protocol Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa AU African Union CAN Christian Association of Nigeria CBD-NGO Community Based Development – Non-Governmental Organization CBO Community Based Organizations CEDAW Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women CEPAN Centre for Peace Advancement in Nigeria CMI Concerned Mothers Initiative CSO Civil Society Organisation DFID UK’s Department for International Development EPE End of Project Evaluation EU European Union FBO Faith Based Organisation FGD Focus Group Discussion FIDA International Federation for Women Lawyers GBP Great Britain Pounds GBV Gender Based Violence GEO Gender and Equal Opportunities GLIHD Great Lakes Initiative for Human Rights and Development HM Haki Mkononi HRC Human Rights Commission KII Key Informant Interview LACVAW Legislative Advocacy Coalition on Violence Against Women LFA Logical Framework Analysis Log Frame Logical Framework M&E Monitoring and Evaluation MDAs Ministries, Departments and Agencies/Authorities MEAL Monitoring Evaluation and Learning MIGEPROF Ministry of Gender and Family Promotion MINADEF Ministry of Defence MINALOC Ministry of Local Administration MINEDUC Ministry of Education MINISANTE Ministry of Health MoU Memorandum of Understanding MP Member of Parliament NEPAD New Partnership for Africa’s Development NGO Non-Governmental Organisation NWC National Women’s
Load more

Recommended publications
  • World Bank Document
    Public Disclosure Authorized ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT AND MONITORING PLAN Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development Rural Electrification Agency ENERGY FOR RURAL TRANSFORMATION PHASE III GRID INTENSIFICATION SCHEMES PACKAGED UNDER WEST NILE, NORTH NORTH WEST, AND NORTHERN SERVICE TERRITORIES Public Disclosure Authorized JUNE, 2019 i LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS CDO Community Development Officer CFP Chance Finds Procedure DEO District Environment Officer ESMP Environmental and Social Management and Monitoring Plan ESMF Environmental Social Management Framework ERT III Energy for Rural Transformation (Phase 3) EHS Environmental Health and Safety EIA Environmental Impact Assessment ESMMP Environmental and Social Mitigation and Management Plan GPS Global Positioning System GRM Grievance Redress Mechanism MEMD Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development NEMA National Environment Management Authority OPD Out Patient Department OSH Occupational Safety and Health PCR Physical Cultural Resources PCU Project Coordination Unit PPE Personal Protective Equipment REA Rural Electrification Agency RoW Right of Way UEDCL Uganda Electricity Distribution Company Limited WENRECO West Nile Rural Electrification Company ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ......................................................... ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................ iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Uganda: Cholera Outbreak
    Disaster Relief Emergency Fund (DREF) Uganda: Cholera Outbreak DREF operation n° MDRUG032 GLIDE n° EP-2013-000058-UGA 15 May, 2013 The International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent (IFRC) Disaster Relief Emergency Fund (DREF) is a source of un-earmarked money created by the Federation in 1985 to ensure that immediate financial support is available for Red Cross and Red Crescent emergency response. The DREF is a vital part of the International Federation’s disaster response system and increases the ability of National Societies to respond to disasters. CHF 184,804 is being requested from the IFRC’s Disaster Relief Emergency Fund (DREF) to support Uganda Red Cross Society (URCS) in delivering assistance to some 900,500 beneficiaries. Un- earmarked funds to repay DREF are encouraged. Summary: th On the 18 April 2013, the Ministry of Health (MoH) reported an outbreak of cholera in the districts of Hoima, Nebbi and Buliisa. The reports from the ministry of health epidemiology and surveillance department indicate that since the beginning of 2013 the cumulative number of cases reported from the cholera affected districts has reached 216 cases and 7 deaths. The overall case fatality rate nationally from these districts stands at 3.2%. An assessment conducted by the District Health Offices and URCS branches on the current outbreak in Nebbi, Buliisa and Hoima estimate that 217,350 persons (38,128 households) in the affected sub-counties are at Red Cross volunteers during a field assessment at the treatment centre high risk of cholera infection during this at Runga landing site Photo: URCS outbreak, with a wider population of 900,500 people in the districts also seen as at risk due to the high mobility of people in the area.
    [Show full text]
  • LG Annual Workplan 201314 Nebbi.Pdf
    Local Government Workplan Vote: 545 Nebbi District Structure of Workplan Foreword Executive Summary A: Revenue Performance and Plans B: Summary of Department Performance and Plans by Workplan C: Draft Annual Workplan Outputs for 2013/14 D: Details of Annual Workplan Activities and Expenditures for 2013/14 Page 1 Local Government Workplan Vote: 545 Nebbi District Foreword The Budget for financial year 2011/12 is derived from the aspirations of the people of Nebbi as expressed in the District’s Vision, Mission statement and Goals which are detailed in the plan. The Vision, Mission and Goals were informed and guided by the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), the five years National Development Plan (2010/11 to 2014/15), the National Resistance Movement (NRM) manifesto, various sector policies and guidelines and our local priorities. Accordingly, the Budget focuses on the strategic areas of economic and social infrastructure construction and rehabilitation, human development and empowerment and poverty reduction. It broadly covers the: construction, rehabilitation and maintenance of schools, health units, roads and bridges; the development of technical staff interms of quality and quantity and; the empowerment of the disadvantaged/vulnerable groups in our society. As a point of emphasis, the District is committed to the efficient use and maintenance of all the facilities that were developed over the years and efforts will be put to ensure that the capacity of the users is strengthened towards correct use inorder to increase facility life span and enjoyment of the services they are meant to offer. Thus, it is envisaged that the budget will be implemented through some of the ongoing programmes such as the National Agricultural Advisory Services (NAADS), the Northern Uganda Peace, Recovery and Development (PRDP), Northern Uganda Social Action plan (NUSAFII) as well as the other Sector’s and Partner’s programmes.
    [Show full text]
  • DOWNLOAD IPC Uganda Acutefi Situation
    REPORT OF THE INTEGRATED FOOD SECURITY PHASE CLASSIFICATION ANALYSIS FOR UGANDA PREPARED BY UGANDA IPC TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP January 2016 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................... 2 Acronyms ................................................................................................................................................. 4 CHAPTER ONE .......................................................................................................................................... 6 1.0 FOOD SECURITY ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY AND SCOPE ............................................................ 6 1.1 Background .......................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 IPC Approach ....................................................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Acute Food Insecurity Analysis- November 2015 to April 2016 ................................................... 7 1.4 Methodology ....................................................................................................................................... 7 1.5 Limitations ........................................................................................................................................... 8 1.6 Summary Findings ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Uganda Health Facilities Survey 2002 [FR140]
    Uganda Health Facilities Survey 2002 Ministry of Health Kampala, Uganda ORC Macro MEASURE DHS+ Calverton, Maryland, USA John Snow, Inc./DELIVER Arlington, Virginia, USA JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc./ Uganda AIDS/HIV Integrated Model District Programme (AIM) Kampala, Uganda June 2003 Contributors: John Snow, Inc./DELIVER JSI Research and Training Institute, Inc./AIM Dana Aronovich Evas Kansiime Allison Farnum Cochran Maurice Adams Erika Ronnow Ministry of Health ORC Macro F. G. Omaswa Gregory Pappas H. Kyabaggu Eddie Mukooyo Martin O. Oteba This report presents findings from the 2002 Uganda Health Facilities Survey (UHFS 2002) carried out by the Uganda Ministry of Health. ORC Macro (MEASURE DHS+) and John Snow, Inc. (DELIVER) provided technical assistance. Other organizations contributing to the project were the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC/Uganda), the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID/Uganda), and the JSI Research and Training Institute, Inc., AIDS/HIV Integrated Model District Programme (AIM). MEASURE DHS+, a USAID-funded project, assists countries worldwide in the collection and use of data to monitor and evaluate population, health, and nutrition programs. Information about the Uganda Health Facilities Survey or about the MEASURE DHS+ project can be obtained by contacting: MEASURE DHS+, ORC Macro, 11785 Beltsville Drive, Suite 300, Calverton, MD 20705 (Telephone 301-572-0200; Fax 301-572-0999; E-mail [email protected]; Internet: www.measuredhs.com). DELIVER, a worldwide technical assistance support project, is funded by the Commodities Security and Logistics Division (CSL) of the Office of Population and Reproductive Health of the Bureau for Global Health (GH) of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • DREF Preliminary Final Report Uganda: Cholera Outbreak
    DREF preliminary final report Uganda: Cholera Outbreak DREF operation n° MDRUG032 GLIDE n° EP-2013-000058 2 June, 2014 The International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent (IFRC) Disaster Relief Emergency Fund (DREF) is a source of un-earmarked money created by the Federation in 1985 to ensure that immediate financial support is available for Red Cross Red Crescent response to emergencies. The DREF is a vital part of the International Federation’s disaster response system and increases the ability of National Societies to respond to disasters. Summary: CHF 184,804 was allocated from the IFRC’s Disaster Relief Emergency Fund (DREF) on 30th August, 2013 to support the Ugandan Red Cross national society (URCS) in delivering assistance to some 900,500 beneficiaries. On 18th April 2013, the Ministry of Health (MoH) reported a cholera outbreak in the districts of Hoima, Nebbi and Buliisa. An assessment conducted by the District Health Offices and URCS branches on the outbreak estimated that 217,350 persons (38,128 households) in the affected sub-counties were at high risk of cholera infection, with a wider population of 900,500 people in the districts also at risk due to high mobility of the population in the area. In close cooperation with the government and other involved agencies, URCS engaged in active case finding, health education URCS volunteers engaged in cholera activity sensitization and mobilization in the community in Nebbi District. Photo: and hygiene promotion activities in the affected areas. URCS Additionally, URCS distributed jerry cans and water treatment products as well as constructing hand washing facilities and emergency latrines.
    [Show full text]
  • District State of Environment Report for Financial Year
    NEBBI DISTRICT STATE OF ENVIRONMENT REPORT FOR FINANCIAL YEAR 2010/2011 June 2011 Nebbi District State of Environment Report for Financial Year 2010/11 THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA NEBBI DISTRICT STATE OF ENVIRONMENT REPORT FOR FINANCIAL YEAR 2010/2011 Department of Environment and Natural Resources Nebbi District Local Government P.O. Box 1 Nebbi, Uganda JUNE 2011 i Nebbi District State of Environment Report for Financial Year 2010/11 Editorial Team Chief Editor: Amule Julius Editor: Odiya Godfrey Author: Fualing Doreen Technical Team Data collection, analysis and compilation Fualing Doreen Senior Environment Officer/Nebbi District Local Gov‟t Ojuku O. Richard Wetlands Officer/Nebbi District Local Government Oloya Micheal Fisheries Officer/Nebbi District Local Government Ruvakuma Lawrence Ag. District Water Officer/Nebbi District Local Gov‟t Onwang Andrew Research Assistant Publication: The publication is available in both hard and soft copy. The hard copy is available in the following libraries: 1. Nebbi Town Council Library at Nebbi Community and Social Centre (NECOSOC) in Nebbi Town Council. 2. Nebbi District Environment Office and Offices of all Head of Sectors. 3. Offices of the Town Clerks and Sub-county Chiefs. 4. Uganda College of Commerce, Pakwach Town Council. 5. Government Aided Secondary Schools in Nebbi District (Pakwach, Nebbi Town, Uringi, Parombo, Angal, Erussi, Panyango and Paroketo). Copy right@ 2010/2011 Nebbi District Local Government All rights reserved. ii Nebbi District State of Environment Report for Financial Year
    [Show full text]
  • UG-Plan-25 A3 24July09 West Nile Region Planning Map - General United Nations
    IMU, UNOCHA Uganda http://www.ugandaclusters.ug http://ochaonline.un.org WEST NILE SUB-REGION: PLANNING MAP (General) SUDAN METU West MIDIGO Moyo MOYO TC (! KEI ! Moyo LUDARA LEFORI MOYO Nimule MOYO DUFILE ! KULUBA Laropi YUMBE ! Koboko KOBOKO)"(! Aringa ROMOGI (! YUMBE )" )" TC APO ADROPI ! Yumbe ITULA Koboko DZAIPI ! LOBULE Lodonga KOBOKO TC ! KURU Adjumani ! MIDIA Obongi DRAJANI (! ADJUMANI TC Obongi ODRAVU ! OLEBA TARA GIMARA Maracha Omugo ! ! East Maracha YIVU OMUGO MARACHA (! Moyo OLUFFE )"(! NYADRI (NYADRI) ADJUMANI PAKELLE ALIBA AII-VU )" Terego (! ODUPI OLUVU KIJOMORO Te re go ! KATRINI OFUA URIAMA AROI MANIBE RIGBO ADUMI Ayivu BELEAFE DADAMU (! OLI RIVER CIFORO ! Arua(! OLUKO RHINO ARUA CAMP HILL PAJULU Rhino Camp ! VURRA AJIA Bondo )" ! Inde Madi- Aru ! ! Okollo )" (! Vurra (! ARUA OGOKO ARIVU ULEPPI Uleppi ! LOGIRI OKOLLO AMURU Okollo ! WADELAI OFFAKA War Lolim KANGO ! ! ATYAK Anaka ! Lalem ! Nwoya Okoro NEBBI (! (! KUCWINY PANYANGO NYAPEA PAKWACH TC ZEU PAIDHA NEBBI TC Jonam )" (! ! Pakwach Padyere NEBBI (! JANGOKORO PAIDHA TC NYARAVUR Goli Pakuba ! ! ERUSSI PAKWACH PAROMBO PANYIMUR Parombo ! Panyimur Paraa ! ! AKWORO Wanseko ! CONGO MASINDI Bulisa (DEM.REP) ! Uganda Overview Mahagi- BULIISA port ! Sudan Congo Legend This map is a work in progress. Data Sources: Map Disclaimer: (Dem.Rep) Please contact the IMU/Ocha Draft )" Landuse Type District Admin Centres Motorable Road National Park as soon as possible with any Admin Boundaries - UBOS 2006 The boundaries and names Forest Reserve corrections. K Admin Centres - UBOS 2002/2006 shown and the designations Kenya (! County Admin Centres District Boundary Rangeland 010205 Landuse - UBOS 2006 used on this map do not imply Game Reserve Kilometers ! To wns County Boundary Water Body/Lakes Road Network - FAO official endorsement or Map Prepare Date: 24 July 2009 (IMU/UNOCHA, Kampala) Towns - Humanitarian Agencies in the field acceptance by the Tanzania Label Sub-County Boundary File: UG-Plan-25_A3_24July09_West Nile Region Planning Map - General United Nations.
    [Show full text]
  • Uganda: Selected Fish Landing Sites and Fishing Communities
    Uganda: Selected Fish Landing Sites and Fishing Communities Survey Undertaken by Fisheries Training Institute for the DFID Project Impacts of globalisation on fish utilisation and marketing systems in Uganda Contents Survey Information Landing Sites on Lake Victoria 1. Kasensero, Rakai District 3 2. Kasenyi, Wakiso District 7 3. Katosi, Mukono District 15 4. Kigungu, Wakiso District 20 5. Kyabasimba Rakai District 27 6. Masese, Jinja District 30 7. Ssenyi, Mukono District 34 8. Wairaka, Jinja District 38 Landing Sites on Lake Kyoga 9. Kayago, Lira District 42 10. Kikaraganya, Nakasongola District 45 11. Kikarangenye, Nakasongola District 58 12. Lwampanga, Nakasongola District 61 13. Namasale, Lira District 74 Landing Sites on Lake Albert 14. Abok, Nebbi District 78 15. Dei, Nebbi District 80 16. Kabolwa, Masindi District 84 17. Wanseko, Masindi District 88 Landing Sites on Lakes Edward and George 18. Kasaka, Bushenyi District 93 19. Katunguru, Bushenyi District 98 20. Katwe, Kasese District 99 21. Kayanja, Kasese District 105 The fieldwork was undertaken by former students at the Fisheries Training Institute in July and August 2002. They recorded their observations on the landing sites and conducted a semi-structured discussion with a group of women at each. The topics covered in the discussion are outlined on the next page. Report edited June 2004. FISHERIES GOBALISATION SURVEY PART III: FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSION (to be used for case study) Group: To identify women leader and those women specifically dealing in fisheries business at landing sites. 1. Can you narrate the development of fisheries over time (before export boom, when exports had just started and now) in terms of the following.
    [Show full text]
  • Civic Engagement
    ecentralization and citizen democracy continue to be a work in progress in Uganda and other African countries. The Local Government Councils’ Scorecard Initiative (LGCSCI) Report 2016/17 titled Civic Engagement: LOCAL GOVERNMENT COUNCILS SCORECARD ASSESSMENT DActivating the Potentials of Local Governance in Uganda explores a wide range of actions for holding governments accountable for executing their mandate ADVOCATES COALITION FOR DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT (ACODE) and providing effective services to citizens. The book highlights an innovative methodology grounded in evidence-based performance scorecards and social accountability practices for direct citizen engagement. While other studies focus on the effects of participatory budgeting and monitoring of public expenditure, LOCAL GOVERNMENT COUNCILS SCORECARD evidence-based evaluation of government performance by civil society has received less attention at the level of practice. This book fills that gap. ASSESSMENT 2016/2017 Civic Engagement: Activating the Potentials of Local Governance in Uganda highlights the civic engagement action plan process, a mechanism for activating the demand side of local governance. The book analyzes the most effective mechanisms for building issue-based civic consciousness of citizens as well as cementing the social contract between the elected leaders and their electorate. The LGCSCI methodology will inspire practical ways for innovators in the fields of social accountability, civic engagement and development to build on successes and address challenges in the decentralization process. The lessons learned provide an invaluable guide for government officials and CIVIC ENGAGEMENT politicians, academics, civil society and development practitioners to grasp ACTIVATING THE POTENTIALS OF LOCAL GOVERNANCE IN how to implement and strengthen local governance, democratic mechanisms UGANDA for citizen engagement, and positive social change.
    [Show full text]
  • Rejoinder Submitted by the Republic of Uganda
    INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE CASE CONCERNING ARMED ACTIVITIES ON THE TERRITORY OF THE CONGO DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO V. UGANDA REJOINDER SUBMITTED BY THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA VOLUME V ANNEXES 6 DECEMBER 2002 VOLUME V ANNEXES - INDEX OF ANNEXES IN CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER VOLUME V 14 Dec. 2001 United Nations Security Council, Record of Meeting Annex 73: Regarding the Situation Concerning the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S/PV.4437 and S/PV.4437 (Resumption 1), 14 December 2001 2002 USAID: Congo FY 2002 Congressional Budget Annex 74: Justification, 2002 1 Feb. 2002 Continued Deteriorating Security Situation in Eastern Annex 75: Democratic Republic of the Congo (Annex to the Letter dated 1 February 2002 from the Permanent Representative ofUganda to the United Nations), S/2002/141, 1 February 2002 14Feb. 2002 Letter dated 5 February 2002 Regardîng Increased Annex 76: Deteriorating Security Situation in Northeastem Democratic Republic of the Congo (Annex to the Letter dated 13 February 2002 from the Permanent Representative of Uganda to the United Nations), S/2002/170, 14 February 2002 4Mar. 2002 U.S. Department of State, 2001 Country Report on Annex 77: Human Rîghts Practices: Democratic Republic of the Congo, 4 March 2002 (excerpts) 22Mar. 2002 Testimony of Ms. Adele (Lotsove) Mugisa before the Annex 78: Porter Commission, 22 March 2002 (excerpts) 27Mar. 2002 Letter dated 26 March 2002 from Permanent Annex 79: Representative of the Democratic Republic of the Congo to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council, S/2002/314, 27 March2002 25 April 2002 "DRC: Focus on· the Results of the Inter-Congolese Annex 80: Dialogue," U.N.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Abstract for Kampala City 2019
    Kampala City Statistical Abstract, 2019 STATISTICAL ABSTRACT FOR KAMPALA CITY 2019 Report prepared with support from Uganda Bureau of Statistics Kampala City Statistical Abstract, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS …………………………………………………………………….…………………………………………. vii ABOUT THIS STATISTICAL ABSTRACT ……………………………………………………………………...………. viii ACKNOWLEDGMENT ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… ix DEFINITIONS USED AS ADAPTED FROM THE NATIONAL POPULATION & HOUSING CENSUS REPORT (2014) 1 CHAPTER ONE: KAMPALA BACKGROUND INFORMATION …………………….…………………………. 2 CHAPTER TWO: CITY ADMINISTRATION ………………………………………….……………………………. 10 CHAPTER THREE: DEMOGRAPHIC AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS ………….……………. 23 CHAPTER FOUR: CITY ECOMOMY, BUSINESS, EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR SERVICES ……………. 30 CHAPTER FIVE: TRANSPORT AND GETTING AROUND KAMPALA ……………….………………………. 51 CHAPTER SIX: HEALTH SERVICES …………………………………….……………………………………. 61 CHAPTER SEVEN: WATER, SANITATION, ENVIRONMENT ……………………………………………………. 73 CHAPTER EIGHT: EDUCATION SERVICES …………………………………….………………………………. 81 CHAPTER NINE: SOCIAL SERVICES ……………………………………….……………………………………. 87 CHAPTER TEN: CRIME, ACCIDENTS AND FIRE EMERGECIES ………………….……………………….. 93 CHAPTER ELEVEN: ASSORTED KCCA PERFORMANCE STATISTICS 2011 – 2019 …….…………………. 97 GENERAL INFORMATION …………………………………………………………………………………………………. 106 ii Kampala City Statistical Abstract, 2019 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Distance to Kampala from Major Cities ......................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]