Region 10 PERSPECTIVE
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
NEWS CLIPS February 12, 2010
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters NEWS CLIPS February 12, 2010 Randall Brassell, Director of Communications Telephone: 615-521-4097 (Fax) 615-824-2164 email: [email protected] CNSNews.com Republicans Oppose Nomination of Pro-Labor Union Activist to Join National Labor Relations Board Friday, February 05, 2010 By Penny Starr, Senior Staff Writer (CNSNews.com) – In a 13-10 vote along party lines, the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee approved the nomination Thursday of Craig Becker to join the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), paving the way for a full Senate vote on the controversial nominee in the coming weeks. But two Republicans on the committee – ranking member Mike Enzi (R-Wyo.) and Lisa Murkowski (R-Ark.) – reversed an earlier vote in October in favor of Becker when his nomination passed out of committee on a 15 to 8 vote. Before the vote, Enzi announced that he could no longer support Becker and urged his Republican colleagues to follow suit. Enzi cited concern about pushing through a controversial nominee before the swearing in of Scott Brown, the Republican who was elected last month to take the seat of the late Democratic Sen. Ted Kennedy. In a last minute change of plans, Brown was sworn in Thursday – a week earlier than originally planned after Brown learned his election would be certified in time for a ceremony that he said would allow him to take part in a number of upcoming “important votes” facing the Senate. “I also want to register my concern with hastily moving controversial nominees before the seating of Senator-elect Scott Brown,” Enzi said. -
Labor Conference Feb 8-9 Speakers Bios.Pdf
Co-sponsored by the American Prospect, Dissent, Georgetown University’s Kalmanovitz Initiative for Labor and the Working Poor, and the Center for Innovation in Worker Organization (CIWO) in the Rutgers School of Management and Labor Relations The Future of American Labor: Initiatives for a New Era #laborfuture Friday, Feb. 8, and Saturday Feb. 9, 2019 SPEAKERS Kate Andrias, Professor of Law, University of Michigan Law School Professor Kate Andrias teaches and writes in the fields of constitutional law, labor law, and administrative law. Her current research focuses on the relationship between these areas of law and economic inequality and on questions of democratic governance. In 2016, Professor Andrias was the recipient of the Law School's L. Hart Wright Award for Excellence in Teaching. She previously served as special assistant and associate counsel to the president of the United States, and as chief of staff of the White House Counsel's Office. While in the White House, she focused on constitutional and administrative law issues and on domestic policy, including labor and immigration. Prior to joining the Obama administration, Professor Andrias was an attorney in the political law and appellate litigation groups of Perkins Coie LLP. She remains active in pro bono cases, including Epic Systems v. Lewis (S.Ct. 2018), for amici Main Street Alliance, the American Sustainable Business Council, and Nick Hanauer; MetLife Inc. v. Financial Stability Oversight Council (D.D.C. 2015), for amici Professors of Law and Finance, arguing in support of the Financial Stability Oversight Council; and Home Care Association of America v. Weil (D.C. -
Nomination of Harold Craig Becker Hearing
S. HRG. 111–717 NOMINATION OF HAROLD CRAIG BECKER HEARING OF THE COMMITTEE ON HEALTH, EDUCATION, LABOR, AND PENSIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION ON NOMINATION OF HAROLD CRAIG BECKER, OF ILLINOIS, TO BE A MEMBER OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD FEBRUARY 2, 2010 Printed for the use of the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/congress/senate U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 54–758 PDF WASHINGTON : 2010 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Nov 24 2008 14:28 Dec 20, 2010 Jkt 035165 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 S:\DOCS\54758.TXT DENISE COMMITTEE ON HEALTH, EDUCATION, LABOR, AND PENSIONS TOM HARKIN, Iowa, Chairman CHRISTOPHER J. DODD, Connecticut MICHAEL B. ENZI, Wyoming BARBARA A. MIKULSKI, Maryland JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire JEFF BINGAMAN, New Mexico LAMAR ALEXANDER, Tennessee PATTY MURRAY, Washington RICHARD BURR, North Carolina JACK REED, Rhode Island JOHNNY ISAKSON, Georgia BERNARD SANDERS (I), Vermont JOHN MCCAIN, Arizona SHERROD BROWN, Ohio ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah ROBERT P. CASEY, JR., Pennsylvania LISA MURKOWSKI, Alaska KAY R. HAGAN, North Carolina TOM COBURN, M.D., Oklahoma JEFF MERKLEY, Oregon PAT ROBERTS, Kansas AL FRANKEN, Minnesota MICHAEL F. BENNET, Colorado DANIEL SMITH, Staff Director FRANK MACCHIAROLA, Republican Staff Director and Chief Counsel (II) VerDate Nov 24 2008 14:28 Dec 20, 2010 Jkt 035165 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 0486 Sfmt 0486 S:\DOCS\54758.TXT DENISE CONTENTS STATEMENTS TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 2, 2010 Page Harkin, Hon. -
Labor Unions: Saviors Or Scourges?
University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship 2013 Labor Unions: Saviors or Scourges? Richard A. Epstein Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/journal_articles Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Richard A. Epstein, "Labor Unions: Saviors or Scourges?," 41 Capital University Law Review 1 (2013). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LABOR UNIONS: SAVIORS OR SCOURGES? RICHARD A. EPSTEIN I. INTRODUCTION: LABOR RETURNS TO THE SPOTLIGHT I am most honored to have been invited this past April 13, 2012, to join the distinguished list of Sullivan lecturers at Capital University Law School. I am also pleased that the law school invited my long-time friend and basketball buddy, Craig Becker, to comment on my remarks, which, as we both know, are not entirely to his liking. The new prominence that labor law receives today stands in sharp contrast to the widespread public indifference to the subject a generation ago.' A dozen years or so ago, I attended a meeting of the Labor Law Section of the Association of American Law Schools, only to hear this common complaint: enrollments in labor law were dropping, and the course was struggling to survive. That trend has continued so that today union membership in the private sector stands at about 6.6% of the workforce, down from about 35% in the 1950s.2 At the same time, the percentage of unionized workers in the public sector rose for much of this period, but it too is now in decline for two reasons: first, many of the recent austerity layoffs; and second, in Wisconsin and Indiana in particular, the rapid decline in union members3 Copyright 0 2013, Richard A. -
Craig Becker Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions July 30, 2009 Questions for the Record: Senator Enzi
National Labor Relations Board Member Nominee: Craig Becker Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions July 30, 2009 Questions for the Record: Senator Enzi 1) Have you discussed with any members of the Obama Administration, any clients, or any other stakeholders the prospect of altering any National Labor Relations Board decisions, regulations or policies, or the prospect of taking steps to promulgate new policies or regulations? Answer: At no time have I discussed with any person any action I would or would not take as a Member of the Board to alter any National Labor Relations Board decisions, regulations or policies; nor have I discussed with any person any steps I would or would not take as a Member of the Board to promulgate new policies or regulations. 2) What have you discussed possibly rescinding and/or promulgating? With who have you discussed the prospect of rescinding or promulgating any such regulations? What has been the substance of each of those discussions? Answer: N/A for the reasons stated in my answer to question 1. 3) Please describe your view of the overall role of the National Labor Relations Board. Do you have a general philosophy regarding the appropriate balance to be struck by the Board in weighing the importance of individual liberty versus collective rights in its decisions? Answer: Congress has vested in the NLRB the authority to administer and enforce the National Labor Relations Act, as amended. The Board’s role is to do so fairly, efficiently, effectively, and consistent with Congress’ intent. The Act vests certain rights in individual employees and it also vests certain rights in employees only when they act concertedly. -
Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 111 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 111 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 156 WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 2010 No. 20 Senate (Legislative day of Monday, February 8, 2010) The Senate met at 2 p.m., on the ex- appoint the Honorable MARK BEGICH, a Sen- legislation. It started with a bipartisan piration of the recess, and was called to ator from the State of Alaska, to perform jobs tax credit with HATCH and SCHU- order by the Honorable MARK BEGICH, a the duties of the Chair. MER; we have a section 171 small busi- Senator from the State of Alaska. ROBERT C. BYRD, ness tax issue that small businesses are President pro tempore. really looking for; we have a highway PRAYER Mr. BEGICH thereupon assumed the bill extension; and we also have Build chair as Acting President pro tempore. The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- America Bonds. fered the following prayer: f We also, prior to the end of this Let us pray. month, have to do some things that are RECOGNITION OF THE MAJORITY extremely important to the country. Our Father, whose power is unsearch- LEADER able and whose judgments are a great We have to extend the PATRIOT Act. The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- We have a number of other things we deep, we quiet our hearts today in Your pore. The majority leader is recog- have to extend. We have only been able presence. nized. to get agreement to extend those for Give to our lawmakers a reverential short periods of time, but they need to awe of You, which is the beginning of f be done—some tax extenders. -
National Right to Work Committee Obama
NNATIONALATIONAL RRIGHTIGHT TOTO WWORKORK CCOMMITTEEOMMITTEE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION PERSONNEL ALERT Harold Craig Becker AFL-CIO Associate General Counsel President-Elect Obama Organizing Transition Committee: U.S. Department of Labor President Obama Administration: U.S. Department of Labor Nominated Position: National Labor Relations Board Member Harold Craig Becker, another Ivy League Obama Appointee who re- lates to everyday struggles? Craig Becker’s World Views Undemocratic Secret Ballot Secret ballot “elections are profoundly undemocratic.” Socialist Countries Better “Unlike citizens in a democratic state and unlike employees in other industrial countries where workplace representation is mandatory (for example, Germany), American workers must first petition the NLRB and then cast an affirmative vote” to award a union exclusive representation. Worker Choices Should Be Limited “At first blush it might seem fair to give workers the choice to remain unrepresented. But, in providing workers this” non-representation “option, US labor law grants employers a powerful incentive.” Craig Becker, New Labor Forum Fall/Winter 1998 No Choice – Workers Must Have A Union “To try to justify his extremist position, Mr. Becker, associate general counsel for the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) and the AFL-CIO, borrowed an extraordinary analogy: “Just as U.S. citizens cannot opt against having a congressman, he contended, workers should not be able to choose against having a union as their monopoly-bargaining agent. “‘Employees' only choice,