DOCSLIB.ORG

Philanthropic Foundations and Development Co-Operation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Philanthropic Foundations and Development Co-Operation Philanthropic Foundations and Development Co-operation Philanthropic Foundations and Development Co-operation Off-print of the DAC Journal 2003, Volume 4, No. 3 www.oecd.org Philanthropic Foundations and Development Co-operation Off-Print of the DAC Journal 2003, Volume 4, No. 3 Development Assistance Committee ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT Pursuant to Article 1 of the Convention signed in Paris on 14th December 1960, and which came into force on 30th September 1961, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) shall promote policies designed: – to achieve the highest sustainable economic growth and employment and a rising standard of living in member countries, while maintaining financial stability, and thus to contribute to the development of the world economy; – to contribute to sound economic expansion in member as well as non-member countries in the process of economic development; and – to contribute to the expansion of world trade on a multilateral, non-discriminatory basis in accordance with international obligations. The original member countries of the OECD are Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. The following countries became members subsequently through accession at the dates indicated hereafter: Japan (28th April 1964), Finland (28th January 1969), Australia (7th June 1971), New Zealand (29th May 1973), Mexico (18th May 1994), the Czech Republic (21st December 1995), Hungary (7th May 1996), Poland (22nd November 1996), Korea (12th December 1996) and the Slovak Republic (14th December 2000). The Commission of the European Communities takes part in the work of the OECD (Article 13 of the OECD Convention). In order to achieve its aims the OECD has set up a number of specialised committees. One of these is the Development Assistance Committee, whose members have agreed to secure an expansion of aggregate volume of resources made available to developing countries and to improve their effectiveness. To this end, members periodically review together both the amount and the nature of their contributions to aid programmes, bilateral and multilateral, and consult each other on all other relevant aspects of their development assistance policies. The members of the Development Assistance Committee are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, the United States and the Commission of the European Communities. Publié en français sous le titre : FONDATIONS PHILANTHROPIQUES ET COOPÉRATION POUR LE DÉVELOPPEMENT © OECD 2003 Permission to reproduce a portion of this work for non-commercial purposes or classroom use should be obtained through the Centre français d’exploitation du droit de copie (CFC), 20, rue des Grands-Augustins, 75006 Paris, France, tel. (33-1) 44 07 47 70, fax (33-1) 46 34 67 19, for every country except the United States. In the United States permission should be obtained through the Copyright Clearance Center, Customer Service, (508)750-8400, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923 USA, or CCC Online: www.copyright.com. All other applications for permission to reproduce or translate all or part of this book should be made to OECD Publications, 2, rue André-Pascal, 75775 Paris Cedex 16, France. Philanthropic Foundations and Development Co-operation Philanthropic Foundations and Development Co-operation Abstract. Philanthropic foundations have made important contributions to development, particularly in agriculture, family planning and infectious diseases control. The most effective interventions have been long-term investments that were based on vision and sound scientific understanding, and were well integrated with local capacities. Foundations’ total expenditure on developmental activities is now about $3 billion annually, mostly from large U.S. foundations. Foundations are increasingly involved in public-private partnerships whose activities range from crop and disease research to improving insfrastructure, especially water supply. They have also evolved innovative approaches to building democratic life in developing countries. Better information exchange with official aid agencies and appropriate fiscal encouragement of their activity can help maximise foundations’ future development contributions. Acknowledgements: This study was prepared by Simon Scott of the Statistics and Monitoring Division, Development Co-operation Directorate, with the assistance of consultants Carol Adelman, Ronen Sebag and Carlos Asenjo Ruiz. The authors wish to thank the persons interviewed for this study, as well as the many foundation staff and government and OECD officials who contributed to its production. Any comments or queries should be addressed to <[email protected]>. © OECD 2003 3 Philanthropic Foundations and Development Co-operation FOREWORD In recent years, several OECD countries have been paying increasing attention to the contribution that private actors can make to development co-operation. To help advance this thinking, the Government of Spain made a special grant to the Development Co-operation Directorate (DCD) to fund a study of the role of philanthropic foundations in development efforts. It was prepared by Simon Scott, a senior DCD official, with the assistance of consultants from Spain and the United States. Specifically, the study aims to: x Inform bilateral aid agencies about the origin and nature of philanthropic foundations active in development x Outline major current activities of such foundations in the development field, including those being supported through public-private partnerships x Suggest means of enhancing communication between foundations and official aid agencies so as to improve development results. The study consists of a policy-oriented analysis of past and present foundation activities in development and includes four commissioned annexes which give detailed background information and data on current projects. Since there is relatively little current literature dealing with foundations’ development work, we have decided to issue this study both in the DAC Journal series, and as a separate offprint. Beyond its initial audience in aid agencies, I hope the study will be of interest both to scholars and to the general reader interested in development. I thank the Government of Spain for making the study possible. Michael Roeskau Director, Development Co-operation Directorate OECD © OECD 2003 5 Philanthropic Foundations and Development Co-operation TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD................................................................................................................................. 5 OVERVIEW.................................................................................................................................. 9 CHAPTER 1 THE FOUNDATION WORLD ........................................................................... 11 Why examine private foundations’ development work? ......................................................... 11 The philanthropic impulse .......................................................................................................12 Historical forms of philanthropy.............................................................................................. 14 Types of foundation ................................................................................................................. 16 The life cycle of a foundation ..................................................................................................17 CHAPTER 2 IMPORTANT FOUNDATION CONTRIBUTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT...... 19 The Green Revolution.............................................................................................................. 19 Population activities................................................................................................................. 23 Infectious diseases control ....................................................................................................... 26 CHAPTER 3 THE SCOPE OF CURRENT FOUNDATION ACTIVITY IN DEVELOPMENT CO-OPERATION ................................................................. 29 The scale of foundations’ development work.......................................................................... 29 Main sectors of activity............................................................................................................ 30 Why are US foundations pre-eminent?.................................................................................... 30 Foundations in Europe ............................................................................................................. 32 Foundations in Japan................................................................................................................ 35 Foundations in other Asian countries ...................................................................................... 36 CHAPTER 4 FOUNDATION INNOVATIONS IN DEVELOPMENT.................................... 37 Funding and organisational innovations .................................................................................. 37 New areas of intervention .......................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Global Philanthropy Forum Conference April 18–20 · Washington, Dc
    GLOBAL PHILANTHROPY FORUM CONFERENCE APRIL 18–20 · WASHINGTON, DC 2017 Global Philanthropy Forum Conference This book includes transcripts from the plenary sessions and keynote conversations of the 2017 Global Philanthropy Forum Conference. The statements made and views expressed are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of GPF, its participants, World Affairs or any of its funders. Prior to publication, the authors were given the opportunity to review their remarks. Some have made minor adjustments. In general, we have sought to preserve the tone of these panels to give the reader a sense of the Conference. The Conference would not have been possible without the support of our partners and members listed below, as well as the dedication of the wonderful team at World Affairs. Special thanks go to the GPF team—Suzy Antounian, Bayanne Alrawi, Laura Beatty, Noelle Germone, Deidre Graham, Elizabeth Haffa, Mary Hanley, Olivia Heffernan, Tori Hirsch, Meghan Kennedy, DJ Latham, Jarrod Sport, Geena St. Andrew, Marla Stein, Carla Thorson and Anna Wirth—for their work and dedication to the GPF, its community and its mission. STRATEGIC PARTNERS Newman’s Own Foundation USAID The David & Lucile Packard The MasterCard Foundation Foundation Anonymous Skoll Foundation The Rockefeller Foundation Skoll Global Threats Fund Margaret A. Cargill Foundation The Walton Family Foundation Horace W. Goldsmith Foundation The World Bank IFC (International Finance SUPPORTING MEMBERS Corporation) The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust MEMBERS Conrad N. Hilton Foundation Anonymous Humanity United Felipe Medina IDB Omidyar Network Maja Kristin Sall Family Foundation MacArthur Foundation Qatar Foundation International Charles Stewart Mott Foundation The Global Philanthropy Forum is a project of World Affairs.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidance for Taxpayers on the Mutual Agreement Procedure (Q&A)
    Guidance for Taxpayers on the Mutual Agreement Procedure (Q&A) July, 2019 Office of the Mutual Agreement Procedure National Tax Agency, Japan This guidance is to complement the contents of the Commissioner’s Directive on the Mutual Agreement Procedure (Administrative Guidelines)*1. This provides clear MAP guidance to taxpayers required by the recommendation of the BEPS Action14 Final Report*2 published in October, 2015. For further information about the Mutual Agreement Procedure, please refer to the Commissioner’s Directive on the Mutual Agreement Procedure (Administrative Guidelines). *1 Amended on May 7, 2019. *2 The BEPS Action14 Final Report: Element 2.1 Countries should publish rules, guidelines and procedures to access and use the MAP and take appropriate measures to make such information available to taxpayers. Countries should ensure that their MAP guidance is clear and easily accessible to the public. Table of Contents 1. The Outline of the Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) Q1－1 What is a MAP? Q1－2 What is the purpose of MAP? Q1－3 Which provisions of a tax treaty allow a MAP? Q1－4 Please provide information regarding the number of MAP cases? Q1－5 Which countries can Japan’s competent authorities negotiate with on MAP cases? Q1－6 Please give details about the circumstances surrounding MAP around the world. Q1－7 How long does it take to resolve a MAP case after its request is made? Q1－8 What items should taxpayers pay attention to for making a MAP request? 2. MAP Q2－1 Who is eligible to request for MAP assistance? Q2－2 How can a taxpayer request for MAP assistance? Q2－3 Can a taxpayer consult with the NTA before requesting MAP assistance? Q2－4 Is there a deadline for holding a pre-filing consultation? Q2－5 What kind of documents should be prepared for a pre-filing consultation? Q2－6 Please provide the application form for requesting MAP assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. General Information
    Reference: 2011/00520/FR/01/01 03/05/2013 EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR HUMANITARIAN AID AND CIVIL PROTECTION – ECHO SINGLE FORM FOR FINAL REPORT 1. GENERAL INFORMATION UNDP-USA 1.2 Title of the Action Strengthening local capacities for response and management of risks with respect to seismic events in the Provinces of Puerto Plata and Santiago, Dominican Republic. 1.3 Area of intervention (country, region, localities) World Area Countries Region America DOMINICAN REPUBLIC Cibao Region: Puerto Plata y Santiago Provinces 1.4 Start date of the Action Start date 01/07/2011 If the Action has already started explain the reason that justifies this situation (urgent Action or other reason) NA 1.5 Duration of the Action in months 18 0 months days 1.6 Start date for eligibility of expenditure Is the start date for eligibility of expenditure equal to the date of submission of the initial proposal? No If yes, explain expenses charged to the budget between date of initial proposal submission and start date of the action If no, enter the start date for eligibility and explain 01/07/2011 NA 1.7 Requested funding modalities for this agreement Multi-donor action In case of 100% financing, justify the request 1.8 Urgent action No If Yes: In case of urgent action in the framework of another ECHO decision, Please justify 1.9 Control mechanism to be applied P 1.10 Proposal and reports Submission date of the initial proposal 15/04/2011 Purpose of this submission FINAL REPORT Agreement number: ECHO/DIP/BUD/2011/92008 page 1/69 Reference: 2011/00520/FR/01/01
    [Show full text]
  • The Business Response to Remedying Human Rights Infringements: the Current and Future State of Corporate Remedy
    The business response to remedying human rights infringements: The current and future state of corporate remedy Human Rights Remedy | June 2018 Australian Business Pledge against Forced Labour i Table of contents 1. Executive summary ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................. 2 2.1 About this Report .................................................................................................................................................. 2 3. Context ......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 3.1 The Remedy Challenge ........................................................................................................................................ 3 4. Existing frameworks and guidance on the provision of remedy ................................................................................... 4 4.1 International Frameworks and Guidance ............................................................................................................. 5 5. Legal Context ..............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PARTNERING for DIAGNOSTIC EXCELLENCE ANNUAL REPORT 2017 Our Vision a World Where Diagnosis Guides the Way to Health for All People
    PARTNERING FOR DIAGNOSTIC EXCELLENCE ANNUAL REPORT 2017 Our vision A world where diagnosis guides the way to health for all people Our mission Turning complex diagnostic challenges into simple solutions to overcome diseases of poverty and transform lives CONTENTS Leadership Message 4 2017 in Numbers 5 Key Achievements in Country Offices 6 Taking Stock: Mid-Term Strategy Review 9 Taking Action Catalyse Development 10 Guide Use & Inform Policy 12 Accelerate Access 13 Shape the Agenda 15 Spotlight on Diseases Fever, AMR & Outbreaks 16 Hepatitis C 18 Malaria 19 Neglected Tropical Diseases 21 Tuberculosis 22 Governance 23 2017 Financial Statements 26 LEADERSHIP MESSAGE Dr Catharina Boehme Mark Kessel Chief Executive Officer Chair of the Board The year 2017 marks the halfway point in diagnostic tests are quality assured. the delivery of our 2015–2020 strategy. We continue to contribute to global We are on track, as confirmed by an research: this year we published external mid-term review, and we enter 65 peer-reviewed manuscripts, and the second half of this strategic period collaborated with WHO to develop with renewed energy and concrete plans target product profiles for new tests, as for further portfolio strengthening. well as in-depth landscape reports and market analyses of diagnostic products. In the past year, more than 15 million For TB, we provided data to support FIND-supported products were provided the WHO recommendation of the Xpert to simplify diagnosis in low- and middle- MTB/RIF Ultra assay, which will advance income countries. We added 9 in vitro TB diagnostic capabilities in difficult-to- diagnostic projects to our portfolio, diagnose populations, such as children bringing the total in development to 48.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Control and Management of Neglected Tropical Skin Diseases
    POLICY PLATFORM Integrated Control and Management of Neglected Tropical Skin Diseases Oriol Mitjà1,2*, Michael Marks3,4, Laia Bertran1, Karsor Kollie5, Daniel Argaw6, Ahmed H. Fahal7, Christopher Fitzpatrick6, L. Claire Fuller8, Bernardo Garcia Izquierdo9, Roderick Hay8, Norihisa Ishii10, Christian Johnson11, Jeffrey V. Lazarus1, Anthony Meka12, Michele Murdoch13, Sally-Ann Ohene14, Pam Small15, Andrew Steer16, Earnest N. Tabah17, Alexandre Tiendrebeogo18, Lance Waller19, Rie Yotsu20, Stephen L. Walker3, Kingsley Asiedu6 1 Skin NTDs Program, Barcelona Institute for Global Health, Hospital Clinic-University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, 2 Division of Public Health, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Papua New Guinea, Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea, 3 Clinical Research Department, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom, 4 Hospital for Tropical Diseases, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom, 5 Neglected Tropical and Non Communicable Diseases Program, Ministry of Health, Government of Liberia, Liberia, 6 Department of Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, a1111111111 7 The Mycetoma Research Centre, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan, 8 International Foundation for a1111111111 Dermatology, London, United Kingdom, 9 Anesvad foundation, Bilbao, Spain, 10 Leprosy Research Center, a1111111111 National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan, 11 Fondation Raoul
    [Show full text]
  • The Global Edge: an Agenda for Chicago’S Future Issues Through Contributions to Opinion and Policy Formation, Leadership Dialogue, and Public Learning
    The Chicago Council on Global Affairs, founded in 1922 as The Chicago Council on Foreign Relations, is a leading independent, nonpartisan organization committed to influencing the discourse on global Future Chicago’s for An Agenda The Global Edge: issues through contributions to opinion and policy formation, leadership dialogue, and public learning. The Global Edge: An Agenda for Chicago’s Future Report of an Independent Study Group Michael H. Moskow, Henry H. Perritt, Jr., and Adele Simmons, Cochairs Sponsored by 332 South Michigan Avenue Suite 1100 Chicago, Illinois 60604 thechicagocouncil.org SPINE The Global Edge: An Agenda for Chicago’s Future RepoRt of an Independent Study GRoup Michael H. Moskow, Henry H. Perritt, Jr., and Adele Simmons, Cochairs SponSoRed by The Chicago Council on Global Affairs is a leading independent, nonpartisan organi- zation committed to influencing the discourse on global issues through contributions Study Group Cochairs to opinion and policy formation, leadership dialogue, and public learning. Michael H. Moskow The Chicago Council provides members, specialized groups, and the general public Senior Fellow for the Global Economy with a forum for the consideration of significant international issues and their bear- ing on American foreign policy. In addition to remaining the premier platform in the The Chicago Council on Global Affairs Midwest for international leaders in foreign policy, The Chicago Council strives to take the lead in gaining recognition for Chicago as an international business center Henry H. Perritt, Jr. for the corporate community and to broaden and deepen the Council’s role in the Professor community. Chicago-Kent College of Law THE CHICAGO COUNCIL TAKES NO INSTITUTIONAL POSITION ON POLICY ISSUES AND HAS NO AFFILIATION WITH THE U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Supporting Creative People and Organizations
    Supporting Creative People and Organizations 2010 Report on Activities John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Table of Contents President’s Essay 6 Year in Review 11 Grantmaking Activities 14 Financial Information 19 Board of Directors 23 Foundation Officers 23 Contact Us 24 1 4 2 5 3 Cover Photos: 1. Women in Nigeria receive potentially lifesaving information about maternal health; 2. A health worker visits a family in rural Mexico; 3. A mentor talks to participants in an evening reporting This annual report and supplementary information center for at-risk youth in Pennsylvania; 4. Quest to Learn, a public school in New York City based on the principles of game design; 5. A Masai community in Kenya watches clips of the about MacArthur’s grantmaking are available at documentary Milking the Rhino about wildlife conservation in their region. www.macfound.org/AR2010. Our mission is to support creative people and organizations across the United States and around the world. Informing the American Public In a media environment characterized by proliferating information sources of varying degrees of reliability, MacArthur seeks to support serious, fact-based journalism for television, radio, and the web, including NPR (National Public Radio). On each visit, I have come away more impressed with the quality of our grantees, their talent and creativity, their energy and determination—often in the face of overwhelming odds. Reducing Maternal Mortality More than 340,000 women die each year due to complications during pregnancy and childbirth, mostly in the developing world. With support from MacArthur, Pathfinder International is introducing a low-tech package of interventions in India and Nigeria to prevent postpartum hemorrhage, a leading cause of maternal deaths worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • Health of Men, Women, and Children in Post-Trafficking Services In
    Articles Health of men, women, and children in post-traffi cking services in Cambodia, Thailand, and Vietnam: an observational cross-sectional study Ligia Kiss, Nicola S Pocock, Varaporn Naisanguansri, Soksreymom Suos, Brett Dickson, Doan Thuy, Jobst Koehler, Kittiphan Sirisup, Nisakorn Pongrungsee, Van Anh Nguyen, Rosilyne Borland, Poonam Dhavan, Cathy Zimmerman Summary Background Traffi cking is a crime of global proportions involving extreme forms of exploitation and abuse. Yet little Lancet Glob Health 2015; research has been done of the health risks and morbidity patterns for men, women, and children traffi cked for various 3: e154–61 forms of forced labour. See Comment page e118 London School of Hygiene & Methods We carried out face-to-face interviews with a consecutive sample of individuals entering 15 post-traffi cking Tropical Medicine, London, UK (L Kiss PhD, C Zimmerman PhD, services in Cambodia, Thailand, and Vietnam. We asked participants about living and working conditions, experience N S Pocock MSc); International of violence, and health outcomes. We measured symptoms of anxiety and depression with the Hopkins Symptoms Organization for Migration, Checklist and post-traumatic stress disorder with the Harvard Trauma Questionnaire, and used adjusted logistic Bangkok, Thailand (D Thuy MA, regression models to estimate the eff ect of traffi cking on these mental health outcomes, controlling for age, sector of V A Nguyen MA, B Dickson BA, P Dhavan MPH, R Borland MA, exploitation, and time in traffi cking. N Pongrungsee, K Sirisup); International Organization for Findings We interviewed 1102 people, of whom 1015 reached work destinations. Participants worked in various sectors Migration, Phnom Penh, including sex work (329 [32%]), fi shing (275 [27%]), and factories (136 [13%]).
    [Show full text]
  • Free: 115.52 KB
    ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK A XECUTIVE D E INSTITUTE Kasumigaseki Bldg. 8F 3-2-5 Kasumigaseki B SUMMARY Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-6008 Japan I Tel: 81 3 3593 5500, Fax: 81 3 3593 5571 SERIES No. S52/01 Email: [email protected] http://www.adbi.org 2001 Tax Conference 5-11 September 2001, Tokyo Executive Summary of Proceedings CONTENTS 2 The governance of tax systems requires governments to Page continue their effort to stamp out corruption and insure Key Messages 1 that the tax systems help the majority and not hurt them in Introduction 3 such endeavors. This is another example of the need for Opening Remarks 3 international cooperation. Taxation in an Interdependent World 4 Japan and International Tax Cooperation 5 3 Tax havens are a genuine concern to all as they erode the Tax Competition Not Necessarily Harmful 5 revenue base. It is however important to understand how E-Commerce and Tax 6 harmful it is and to whom? Who really benefits from tax The Source of Income, Tax Arbitrage and havens? Perhaps this is an area, which deserves detailed Double Tax Agreements 7 research. Transfer Pricing–Advance Pricing Agreements 8 Rationale and Scope for Fiscal Restructuring in At the specific country level, fiscal restructuring and Asia 9 4 Environmental Tax 10 financial sector restructuring are areas where attention Tax Administration and Compliance 11 of national governments as well as donors should go for Electronic Filing of Tax Returns 13 a long-term solution to the ensuing problem from truly Country Experiences with Value Added Tax tax havens.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Taxation in Japan
    Papers on the Local Governance System and its Implementation in Selected Fields in Japan No.10 Local Taxation in Japan Kenichiro HARADA Vice Mayor Komono Town Council of Local Authorities for International Relations (CLAIR) Institute for Comparative Studies in Local Governance (COSLOG) National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies (GRIPS) Except where permitted by the Copyright Law for “personal use” or “quotation” purposes, no part of this booklet may be reproduced in any form or by any means without the permission. Any quotation from this booklet requires indication of the source. Contact Council of Local Authorities for International Relations (CLAIR) (The International Information Division) Sogo Hanzomon Building 1-7 Kojimachi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 102-0083 Japan TEL: 03-5213-1724 FAX: 03-5213-1742 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.clair.or.jp/ Institute for Comparative Studies in Local Governance (COSLOG) National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies (GRIPS) 7-22-1 Roppongi, Minato-ku, Tokyo 106-8677 Japan TEL: 03-6439-6333 FAX: 03-6439-6010 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www3.grips.ac.jp/~coslog/ Foreword The Council of Local Authorities for International Relations (CLAIR) and the National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies (GRIPS) have been working since FY 2005 on a “Project on the overseas dissemination of information on the local governance system of Japan and its operation”. On the basis of the recognition that the dissemination to overseas countries of information on the Japanese local governance system and its operation was insufficient, the objective of this project was defined as the pursuit of comparative studies on local governance by means of compiling in foreign languages materials on the Japanese local governance system and its implementation as well as by accumulating literature and reference materials on local governance in Japan and foreign countries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Macarthur Foundation Is Investing $150 Million to Preserve And
    an initiative supported by The Preservation Compact: A Rental Hudson Institute* University of Florida Shimberg Center for Housing Strategy for Cook County Washington, DC Affordable Housing Chicago, IL Contact: John C. Weicher, Senior Fellow Gainsville, FL Contact: Judith Levey, ULI Chicago – and Director – Center for Housing and Contact: William O’Dell, Associate Director Director of Community Outreach Financial Markets and Manager – Florida Housing Data www.chicago.uli.org www.hudson.org Clearinghouse; Nancy Muller, Policy Director – Florida Housing Finance Corporation The Preservation Compact Interagency Milano The New School for Management www.shimberg.ufl.edu The MacArthur Foundation is investing $150 million to preserve and improve Coordinating Council and Urban Policy Chicago, IL New York, NY Research: Model Preservation affordable rental homes across the U.S. A list of all funding recipients through the end of Contact: Stacie Young, Director Contact: Alex F. Schwartz, Associate www.realestate.depaul.edu Professor and Chair of Policy Programs Policies and Best Practices 2007 follows. For complete funding guidelines, including instructions to apply for our new www.newschool.edu/milano of Affordable Rental awards for state and local preservation leaders, and other information about MacArthur’s Sargent Shriver National Center on Housing Owners Poverty Law New Jersey Housing and Mortgage support for affordable housing, please visit windowofopportunity.macfound.org. Chicago, IL Finance Agency California Housing Partnership Contact: Katherine E. Walz, Senior Attorney Trenton, NJ Corporation Through our Window of Opportunity initiative MacArthur The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation www.povertylaw.org Contact: Peter Kasabach, Chief of Policy and San Francisco, CA supports policy analysis, data collection and expert is a private, independent grantmaking institution Community Development Contact: Matt Schwartz, Executive Director assistance to encourage investment in rental housing and helping to build a more just and sustainable world.
    [Show full text]