View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by George Washington University Law School GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works Faculty Scholarship 2014 (E)Racing Trayvon Martin Cynthia Lee George Washington University Law School,
[email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.gwu.edu/faculty_publications Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Ohio St. J. Crim. L. (forthcoming) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. (E)Racing Trayvon Martin Cynthia Lee* INTRODUCTION As we celebrate the 25th anniversary of Critical Race Theory [CRT], we have much to celebrate and much work ahead. In its early years, Critical Race Theory was a much-criticized and denigrated body of scholarship. By and large, critical race scholars were law professors of color writing about issues of racial subordination and injustice. Their work was criticized as insufficiently rigorous.1 The use of narrative or storytelling, a prominent feature of much CRT scholarship, was criticized as well.2 Many junior law professors of color were warned by more senior professors of color not to write about race before acquiring tenure as doing so might negatively affect their chances of getting tenure.3 Today, CRT, while still viewed negatively by many, has become a much more respected mode of scholarship. Many law schools today offer courses on Critical Race Theory or Race, Racism, and the Law.