Effect of Bran Particle Size on Stool Weight

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Effect of Bran Particle Size on Stool Weight Gut: first published as 10.1136/gut.19.1.60 on 1 January 1978. Downloaded from Gut, 1978, 19, 60-63 Effect of bran particle size on stool weight A. J. M. BRODRIBB AND CHRIS GROVES From the Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford, and the Oxford Polytechnic, Oxford SUMMARY The increase in stool weight after feeding 20 g (dry weight) of bran daily was measured when this was oflarge particle size and after milling to small particle size. Twenty-eight investigations were carried out in 21 normal subjects. With coarse bran, stool weight was significantly greater than with the fine bran (mean 219-4 g/d coarse bran, 199-0 g/d fine bran: difference 20-4 g SE + 6-4, P < 0.01). The coarse bran also had a greater water-holding capacity (7.3 g water/g coarse bran, 3.9 g water/g fine bran). Coarse bran was 21 times the volume of fine bran for a given weight and more fine bran will, therefore, be taken when bran is prescribed by the spoonful. Wheat bran is now consumed in large quantities as was then eaten for two weeks, 20 g dry weight daily, a concentrated form of dietary fibre supplement. and all stool specimens weighed during the second Different varieties are available varying in pala- week. The other variety of bran was then eaten for tability, fibre content, and particle size (Southgate, two weeks and stool weight measured for the second 1976a, b). It has been suggested that particle size is week. Finally, no bran was eaten for the sixth and important in determining the therapeutic effective- seventh weeks and stool weight was measured for ness of bran (Kirwan et al., 1974). The finer it is, the the seventh week. Subjects were randomly allocated less its water-holding capacity (McConnell et al., to eat coarse or fine bran first and were asked to 1974), and the more susceptible in may be to maintain a similar diet throughout the seven week bacterial digestion within the colon (Nutritional period, without changes in fibre intake apart from http://gut.bmj.com/ Reviews, 1975). A study was, therefore, carried the bran. out to determine whether a change in particle size Dietary fibre, hemicellulose, cellulose, lignin, alone affects the laxative properties of bran. crude fibre, and neutral detergent fibre values for each bran were obtained (Southgate, 1976b). Method Particle size was determined by a standardised sieving test in which bran was passed through a Twenty-one volunteers, nine men and 12 women, series of screens of different mesh size and the weight on September 25, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. measured their daily stool weight before, during, retained on each was measured. Water-holding and after eating coarse and fine bran. This was capacity was determined by the method described carried out a total of 28 times, as several subjects by McConnell et al. (1974), in which the weight of repeated the study. The volunteers, aged 20 to 40 water held by the bran after centrifugation was years, were doctors, science lecturers, nurses, measured. paramedical staff, technicians, and medical students. A large quantity of extremely coarse bran was Results carefully blended and then half of this was hammer- milled very finely with no further extraction. Both The fibre content, particle size and water-holding varieties were sterilised in dry heat at 160°C for one capacity of the two types of bran are shown in hour and were subsequently sterile on culture. The Table 1. water content of each bran was determined, and the It will be noted that, while there are only minimal bran divided into portions equivalent to 20 g dry differences in fibre content, there are considerable weight in self-sealing plastic bags. differences in particle size and water-holding capacity A normal diet was eaten for the first week of the between the two types of bran. study and all stool specimens were weighed using The basal daily stool weight was calculated as the spring balances which had previously been checked mean of 14 days (first and seventh weeks). The as accurate to the nearest gram. One type of bran increase in daily stool weight was calculated as the difference between this and the mean daily stool Received for publication 14 June 1977 weight for weeks 3 or 5. The statistical significance 60 Gut: first published as 10.1136/gut.19.1.60 on 1 January 1978. Downloaded from 61 Effect ofbran particle size on stool weight Table 1 Properties ofcoarse andfine bran The number of bowel actions per week increased with bran from a mean of 7T8 to 10-1 on coarse bran Coarse Fine was no bran and 9-7 on fine bran. There significant bran (g) (g) difference in defaecation rate between the two types Fibre content per 100 g dry wt. of bran. Those with smaller basal stool weights had Crudefibre 11-8 12-1 increase in stool weight after bran, Neutral detergent fibre 47-7 48-8 a slightly smaller Total dietary fibre 49 3 46-7 but the difference was much less than that of the Non-cellulose polysaccharide 30 4 29-9 basal weights. Cellulose (as glucose) 13-0 119 Liainin 5 9 49 There was no statistical difference in response to Particle size distribution bran between those who ate the fine and those who % by weight ofeach fraction (sieve aperture in microns) >1500 82-8 5-6 ate the coarse bran first. 1500/710 12-7 13-6 710/500 1-5 22-9 500/210 0*5 31-9 Discussion <210 25 26-0 Water-holding capacity The two types of bran were taken from the same Wt. ofwater held by 1 g bran (dry weight) 7-3 3 9 pooled sample and it was, therefore, not surprising that their fibre content was similar. The small differences were almost certainly attributable to It was more difficult to finebranbran sampling problems. get good Table 2 Laxative effect ofcoarse andjfine replicates with the coarse bran, possibly because of Bran eaten slight fractionation of the sample. The method for Mean daily stool weight (g) first determining water-holding capacity was not entirely Basal Increase with Increasewith satisfactory, as the samples did not form coherent coarse bran fine bra pellets on centrifugation, but agreement between 47 6 38 Fine duplicates was good. The higher value for the coarse 68 98 43 Coarse 80 54 34 Coare material is probably partly due to water held 81 78 72 Coarse between individual fragments as opposed to water 88 68 34 90 104 63 Faine held within the structure of the fragment. The finer 93 42 62 Fine sample would be expected to drain more thoroughly http://gut.bmj.com/ 102 82 21 Fine test The present results are 117 109 162 Coarse under the conditions. 120 78 45 Fine comparable with those of Weinreich (1976). 120 44 63 Fine The water content of the bran was variable, 129 47 44 Fine 133 15 37 Coarse especially after sterilising, and all measurementswere, 140 85 54 Coarse therefore, done on a dry weight basis. The water 141 87 56 142 154 40 Fine content of each batch was monitored and the bran 146 87 89 Coarse kept in water-tight containers until it had been on September 25, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. 146 74 25 as water was absorbed from 147 56 49 FCionae weighed out, readily 155 68 25 Fine the atmosphere. 174 117 68 Coarse Cereal fibre is normally eaten after heat treatment 185 72 39 Coarse 187 125 78 Coarse as bread, cake, biscuits, or breakfast cereals, so this 195 84 73 Coarse was not considered detrimental to the value of 202 122 101 Coarse of cooking 204 63 70 Coarse the study, although the biological effect 219 63 51 Fine cereal fibre has not been clearly defined. 272 139 124 Fine The subjects were allowed to eat their normal Mean: 140-1 79 3 58 9 diet throughout the study and carefully avoided changes in fibre intake apart from the additional bran. The considerable difference in basal stool of the difference between the meari increase in stool weight may reflect differences in the amount of fibre weight on coarse and fine bran vwas calculated by consumed from one individual to another. Other Student's t test. The results are tabulated in Table 2, studies in progress suggest that this can vary from with the lowest basal stool weilght first and the less than 3 g to more than 48 g dietary fibre daily. largest last. Diet is often different at the weekend compared The increase in mean stool weDight with coarse with the working week, so stool weights were bran was 79-3 g and with fine bran 58*9 g. The mean measured for a complete week to allow for such difference in increase between the two was 20-4 g, normal fluctuations. Weighing was not difficult SE ± 6-4, p < 0-01 (t = 3-17). with the use of accurate spring balances and was Gut: first published as 10.1136/gut.19.1.60 on 1 January 1978. Downloaded from 62 A. J. M. Brodribb and Chris Groves found to be a convenient method that allowed for faeces (Cowgill and Anderson, 1932; Wyman et al., immediate disposal of the specimen. Nearly all 1976), and in vitro water-holding capacity tests may subjects had received a scientific training and were not be relevant to intracolonic behaviour. Coarse used to making precise measurements and keeping bran particles are probably less readily digested by accurate records.
Recommended publications
  • Canadian Wheat
    Canadian Wheat By: J. E. Dexter1, K.R. Preston1 and N. J. Woodbeck2 Chapter 6: Future of flour a compendium of flour improvement, 2006, pg - 43-62 Edited by Lutz Popper, Wermer Schafer and Walter Freund. Agrimedia, Bergen. Dunne, Germany. 1 Canadian Grain Commission, Grain Research Laboratory, 1404-303 Main Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3C 3G8, Canada 2 Canadian Grain Commission, Industry Services, 900-303 Main Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3C 3G8, Canada Introduction The vast majority of Canadian wheat is produced in western Canada (Manitoba and provinces to the west). A high proportion of western Canadian wheat is exported, and it is marketed in a highly regulated fashion. As soon as western Canadian wheat is delivered by producers to a grain elevator the wheat becomes the property of the Canadian Wheat Board, which is a single desk seller for western Canadian wheat. Approval for registration into any of the eight classes of wheat in western Canada is based on merit according to disease resistance, agronomic performance and processing quality. Wheat is also produced in eastern Canada, primarily in southern Ontario. Eastern Canadian wheat is also registered on the basis of merit, although processing quality models are not quite as strictly defined as for western Canada. There is no single desk seller for eastern Canadian wheat. Eastern Canadian wheat is marketed by private trading companies and the Ontario Wheat Producers Marketing Board. Approximately 50% of eastern Canadian wheat disappears domestically. The Canadian Grain Commission (CGC), a Department within Agriculture and Agri- Food Canada (AAFC), oversees quality assurance of Canadian grains, oilseeds, pulses and special crops.
    [Show full text]
  • The Canadian Wheat Board, Warburtons, and the Creative
    The Canadian Wheat Board and the creative re- constitution of the Canada-UK wheat trade: wheat and bread in food regime history by André J. R. Magnan A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Sociology University of Toronto © Copyright by André Magnan 2010. Abstract Title: The Canadian Wheat Board and the creative re-constitution of the Canada-UK wheat trade: wheat and bread in food regime history Author: André J. R. Magnan Submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Sociology University of Toronto, 2010. This dissertation traces the historical transformation of the Canada-UK commodity chain for wheat-bread as a lens on processes of local and global change in agrofood relations. During the 1990s, the Canadian Wheat Board (Canada‟s monopoly wheat seller) and Warburtons, a British bakery, pioneered an innovative identity- preserved sourcing relationship that ties contracted prairie farmers to consumers of premium bread in the UK. Emblematic of the increasing importance of quality claims, traceability, and private standards in the reorganization of agrifood supply chains, I argue that the changes of the 1990s cannot be understood outside of historical legacies giving shape to unique institutions for regulating agrofood relations on the Canadian prairies and in the UK food sector. I trace the rise, fall, and re-invention of the Canada-UK commodity chain across successive food regimes, examining the changing significance of wheat- bread, inter-state relations between Canada, the UK, and the US, and public and private forms of agrofood regulation over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Grains Fact Sheet
    whole grains Fact sheet what is whole grain? To understand the term “whole grain,” let’s start with a few Bran: protects basics. the seed •Fiber •B vitamins A grain is really a seed from any number of cereal plants •Trace Minerals (such as wheat or barley). A grain kernel has 3 parts—the germ, bran, and endosperm— and each of them contains unique nutrients and vitamins. Germ: nutrient To make flour, grain is milled (or ground)… storehouse •B Vitamins Endosperm: •Vitamin E …when the bran and germ are extracted and only the provides endosperm is milled, that makes white flour. •Trace Minerals energy •Antioxidants •Carbohydrates •Healthy Fats •Protein …when all 3 of parts of the kernel are milled, that makes •Some B Vitamins whole grain flour, also referred to as whole wheat flour. Whole grains not only retain more B vitamins, minerals like iron and zinc, protein and carbohydrates, they also deliver antioxidants, phytonutrients, and beneficial fiber. When it comes to good stuff for you, they can even compete with fruits and vegetables! the whole grains council The Whole Grain Council (WGC) has defined whole grain as having “100% of the original kernel, and therefore all the nutrients and vitamins, must be present to qualify as whole grain.” To identify products that contain significant sources of whole grains, look for the WGC stamp printed on the bags, boxes, or containers of those food items that qualify. whole grains Fact sheet what do the doctors say? • Have 3 servings of whole grains per day, or at least 48 grams per day.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Wheat Bran in Breadmaking'
    (Dubois 1978, Shogren et al 1981) and introducing gritty textures GOULD, J. M., JASBERG, B. K., DEXTER, L., HSU, J. T., LEWIS, (Pomeranz et al 1976, Prentice and D'Appolonia 1977). This is in S. M., and FAHEY, G. C., Jr. 1989. High-fiber, noncaloric flour contrast with the partially delignified, extensively hydrated substitute for baked foods. Properties of alkaline peroxide-treated wheat straw. Cereal Chem. 66:201-205. structure of AHP-treated lignocellulose that softens and integrates JASBERG, B. K., GOULD, J. M., WARNER, K., and NAVICKIS, L. L. readily into the starch-gluten matrix with apparently minimal 1989a. High-fiber, noncaloric flour substitute for baked foods. Effects of interruption of matrix continuity (Jasberg et al 1989a). alkaline peroxide-treated lignocellulose on dough properties. Cereal Chem. 66:205-209. LITERATURE CITED JASBERG, B. K., GOULD, J. M., and WARNER, K. 1989b. High-fiber, noncaloric flour substitute for baked foods. Use of alkaline peroxide- COTE, G. L., and ROBYT, J. F. 1983. The formation of alpha-D-(1-3) treated lignocellulose in chocolate cake. Cereal Chem. 66:209-213. branch linkages by an exocellular glucansucrase from Leuconostoc POMERANZ, Y., SHOGREN, M. D., and FINNEY, K. F. 1976. White mesenteroides NRRL B-742. Carbohydr. Res. 119:141-156. wheat bran and brewer's spent grains in high-fiber bread. Baker's Dig. DeFOUW, D. F., ZABIK, M. E., UEBERSAX, M. A., AGUILERA, J. M., 50(6):35-38. and LUSAS, E. 1982. Use of unheated and heat-treated navy bean hulls PRENTICE, N., and D'APPOLONIA, B. L. 1977. High-fiber bread as a source of dietary fiber in spice-flavored layer cakes.
    [Show full text]
  • Gluten-Free Diet Guide for Families
    Gluten-Free Diet Guide for Families PO Box 6 Flourtown, PA 19031 215-233-0808 215-233-3918 (Fax) www.CeliacHealth.org www.CDHNF.org www.NASPGHAN.org Support for this CDHNF/ NASPGHAN Gluten-Free Diet Guide was provided by the University of Maryland Center for Celiac Research view the gluten-free diet and any other specific nutritional needs of your child. The registered dietitian will be able to help you contact local support groups and direct you to reliable web sites. WHAT IS GLUTEN? Gluten is the general name for one of the proteins found in wheat, rye, and barley. It is the substance in flour that forms the structure of dough, the “glue” that holds the product TABLE OF CONTENTS together and is also the leavening ingredient. When these proteins are present in the diet of someone with CD, they Introduction . 2 become toxic and cause damage to the intestine. This damage leads to decreased absorption of essential nutri- What can the celiac patient eat? . 3 ents and, if left untreated, can lead to nutrient deficiency How do I start . 3 and subsequent disease (i.e. iron deficiency anemia, de- creased bone density, unintentional weight loss, folate and Gluten-Free Shopping List . 4 vitamin B12 deficiency). Life goes on! . 6 WHERE IS GLUTEN FOUND? Once the diet has started . 7 Food/grains Resources . 8 The grains containing gluten include wheat, rye, barley, and all their derivatives (see Table 1 for a listing of grains to be avoided). These grains are used in such items as breads, Introduction cereals, pasta, pizza, cakes, pies, and cookies and as add- ed ingredients to many processed food items.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiber Information Sheet Your Doctor Has Recommended That You Follow A
    Fiber Information Sheet Your doctor has recommended that you follow a high fiber diet. The addition of fiber to your diet can make an enormous difference in your bowel control and regularity. Fiber helps people whether they lose stool or have trouble with constipation. Fiber works by bulking the stool and keeping it formed, yet making the movement soft and easy to pass. Fiber helps keep moisture within the stool so that neither diarrhea nor hard stool occurs. Fiber makes the bowels work more regularly, but it is not a laxative. An additional bonus from eating a high fiber diet is that your risk of cancer is reduced, too. Most of us eat some high fiber foods already, but nearly all of us do not eat the necessary amount. For example, a slice of whole wheat bread contains only about 10% of the daily recommended amount of fiber. This means if you are relying on only whole wheat bread to meet the recommended fiber requirements, you would need to eat between 10-18 slices every day! Please note that fiber is NOT in any meat or dairy product. It is only found in grains, vegetables and fruits. The recommended daily fiber intake is 20-25 grams. Foods having high fiber content include: Fiber One Cereal, ½ cup 13.0 g Pinto beans, ¾ cup 10.4 g Wheat bran cereal, 1 oz 10.0 g Kidney beans, ¾ cup 9.3 g All Bran Cereal, ½ cup 6.0 g Oat Bran Cereal, hot, 1 oz 4.0 g Banana, 1medium 3.8 g Canned pears, ½ cup 3.7 g 3 prunes or ¼ cup raisins 3.5 g Whole Wheat Total, 1 cup 3.0 g Carrots, ½ cup 3.2 g Apple, small 2.8 g Broccoli, ½ cup 2.8 g Cauliflower, ½ cup 2.6 g Oatmeal, 1 oz 2.5 g Whole Wheat Toast 2.0 g Cheerios, 1 1/3 cup 2.0 g Baked potato with skin 2.0 g Corn, ½ cup 1.9 g Popcorn, 3 cups 1.9 g Orange, medium 1.9 g Granola bar 1.0 g Lettuce, ½ cup 0.9 g If you don’t think that you can get enough fiber through your everyday diet, there are many good fiber supplements you can take along with eating your high fiber diet.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Defatted Rice Bran with Emphasis on Bioconversion Strategies
    fermentation Review Valorising Agro-industrial Wastes within the Circular Bioeconomy Concept: the Case of Defatted Rice Bran with Emphasis on Bioconversion Strategies Maria Alexandri *, José Pablo López-Gómez , Agata Olszewska-Widdrat and Joachim Venus * Leibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering and Bioeconomy, Department of Bioengineering, Max-Eyth-Allee 100, 14469 Potsdam, Germany; [email protected] (J.P.L.-G.); [email protected] (A.O.-W.) * Correspondence: [email protected] (M.A.); [email protected] (J.V.) Received: 17 February 2020; Accepted: 20 April 2020; Published: 22 April 2020 Abstract: The numerous environmental problems caused by the extensive use of fossil resources have led to the formation of the circular bioeconomy concept. Renewable resources will constitute the cornerstone of this new, sustainable model, with biomass presenting a huge potential for the production of fuels and chemicals. In this context, waste and by-product streams from the food industry will be treated not as “wastes” but as resources. Rice production generates various by-product streams which currently are highly unexploited, leading to environmental problems especially in the countries that are the main producers. The main by-product streams include the straw, the husks, and the rice bran. Among these streams, rice bran finds applications in the food industry and cosmetics, mainly due to its high oil content. The high demand for rice bran oil generates huge amounts of defatted rice bran (DRB), the main by-product of the oil extraction process. The sustainable utilisation of this by-product has been a topic of research, either as a food additive or via its bioconversion into value-added products and chemicals.
    [Show full text]
  • Wheat Bran Modifications for Enhanced Nutrition And
    molecules Review Wheat Bran Modifications for Enhanced Nutrition and Functionality in Selected Food Products Oluwatoyin O. Onipe 1,*, Shonisani E. Ramashia 1 and Afam I. O. Jideani 1,2 1 Department of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Science, Engineering and Agriculture, University of Venda, Thohoyandou 0950, South Africa; [email protected] (S.E.R.); [email protected] (A.I.O.J.) 2 Postharvest-Handling Group, ISEKI-Food Association, 1190 Vienna, Austria * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The established use of wheat bran (WB) as a food ingredient is related to the nutritional components locked in its dietary fibre. Concurrently, the technological impairment it poses has impeded its use in product formulations. For over two decades, several modifications have been investigated to combat this problem. Ninety-three (93) studies (review and original research) pub- lished in English between January 1997 and April 2021 reporting WB modifications for improved nutritional, structural, and functional properties and prospective utilisation in food formulations were included in this paper. The modification methods include mechanical (milling), bioprocessing (enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation with yeasts and bacteria), and thermal (dry heat, extrusion, autoclaving), treatments. This review condenses the current knowledge on the single and com- bined impact of various WB pre-treatments on its antioxidant profile, fibre solubilisation, hydration Citation: Onipe, O.O.; Ramashia, properties, microstructure, chemical properties, and technological properties. The use of modified S.E.; Jideani, A.I.O. Wheat Bran WB in gluten-free, baked, and other food products was reviewed and possible gaps for future re- Modifications for Enhanced Nutrition search are proposed.
    [Show full text]
  • Sourdough Bran Bread Teresa L Greenway – All Rights Reserved Worldwide (Makes 2 Loaves, 1767 Grams Total at 100% Hydration)
    Sourdough Bran Bread Teresa L Greenway – All rights reserved worldwide (Makes 2 loaves, 1767 grams total at 100% hydration) • 150 grams bran flakes and then pour • 300 grams of boiling water over the flakes. • 250 grams sourdough starter at 100% hydration • 450 grams water (for a drier dough try 400 grams water - 94% dough) • 600 grams bread flour • 17 grams sea salt Very carefully pour the boiling water over the bran flakes in a heat and shock proof dish. Set aside to cool. To a large mixing bowl or dough trough add the starter, water and bread flour and mix well. Let rest and autolyse for one hour. Add the cooled bran mixture and the salt and fold to incorporate. Over the next 2 -3 hours of bulk ferment, keep folding until everything is fully incorporated. Once the dough pulls a nice window pane and is very bubbly and active cover tightly and move to the refrigerator for another 14 – 18 hours of cold bulk ferment. The next day remove the dough from the refrigerator. Preheat oven, baking stone and roasting lid to 500F/260C. Shape dough as desired and place in floured bannetons. Let proof at room temperature approximately one hour or more. Turn first loaf out onto floured parchment paper atop a baking peel. Wet your scoring blade which will make scoring such a high hydration dough easier. Score in a simple manner and slide into the preheated oven. Cover loaf with preheated roasting lid and lower the oven temperature to 480F/249C. Remove the lid after the first 15 minutes and continue to bake uncovered for an additional 20-30 minutes, turning if necessary for even browning.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Whole Wheat, Bran and Shorts on Body Weight and Feather Growth in Chicks F
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Historical Research Bulletins of the Nebraska Agricultural Research Division of IANR Agricultural Experiment Station (1913-1993) 5-1940 The nflueI nce of Whole Wheat, Bran and Shorts on Body Weight and Feather Growth in Chicks F. E. Mussehl C. W. Ackerson M. J. Blish Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ardhistrb Part of the Agriculture Commons, and the Poultry or Avian Science Commons Mussehl, F. E.; Ackerson, C. W.; and Blish, M. J., "The nflueI nce of Whole Wheat, Bran and Shorts on Body Weight and Feather Growth in Chicks" (1940). Historical Research Bulletins of the Nebraska Agricultural Experiment Station (1913-1993). 37. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ardhistrb/37 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Agricultural Research Division of IANR at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Historical Research Bulletins of the Nebraska Agricultural Experiment Station (1913-1993) by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION RESEARCH BULLETIN 119 The Influence of Whole Wheat, Bran and Shorts on Body Weight nd Feather Growth in Chicks F. E. Mussehl, C. W. Ackerson, and M. J. Blish LINCOLN, NEBRASKA MAY 1940 COLLEGE OF AGRI CULTURE UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA AGRI CULTURAL EXPERIMENT STA TION RESEARCH BULLETIN 119 The Influence of Whole Wheat, Bran and Shorts on Body Weight and Feather Growth in Chicks F. E. Mussehl, C. W. Ackerson, and M. J. Blish LINCOLN, NEBRASKA MAY 1940 CONTENTS PAGE Composition and Nutritive Values .
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Grains Defined Whole Grains Play a Role in a Healthy Diet, Helping to Fuel Our Bodies and Brains
    Whole Grains Defined Whole grains play a role in a healthy diet, helping to fuel our bodies and brains. Studies show that eating whole grains instead of refined grains can lower the risk of many chronic diseases, and switching to whole grains also can help with weight control. Benefits kick in with even one serving (16g), but aim for three or more servings daily for best health results. WHAT EXACTLY IS A WHOLE GRAIN? Whole grains or foods made from them contain all the essential parts and naturally-occurring nutrients of the entire grain seed in their original proportions. If the grain has been processed (e.g., cracked, crushed, rolled, extruded, and/or cooked), the food product should deliver the same rich balance of nutrients that are found in the original grain seed. This means that 100% of the original kernel – all of the bran, germ, and endosperm – must be present to qualify as a whole grain. These three parts - the outer bran layer rich in fiber and B vitamins; the germ, full of antioxidants; and the starchy endosperm, each bring something nutritious and delicious to the table. When you eat the “whole” grain you’re enjoying a good for you food. REFINED GRAINS If the bran and germ (the healthiest parts) are removed, the grain is said to be refined. Refined grains are missing about two-thirds of many essential nutrients. Some grains are then enriched, but this only returns about five the missing nutrients. TM HOW TO IDENTIFY A WHOLE GRAIN TM An easy way to distinguish whole grain products is to look for the TM Whole Grain Stamp on the package (shown here).
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Feeds for Cattle Operations During Drought
    ANR Publication 8565 | June 2016 http://anrcatalog.ucanr.edu DROUGHT TIP Supplemental Feeds for Cattle Operations during Drought ne of the advantages of cattle production in California is the diversity of feeds available Oin times of need to supplement rangeland that is normally used for cattle. In most cases, supplementing with alfalfa or a combination JOSH S. DAVY, University of of alfalfa and small grain hay is the easiest method to meet protein, California Cooperative Extension Livestock, Range, and Natural energy, and calcium requirements when rangeland nutrients are depleted Resources Advisor, Tehama/ due to drought. When the market prices of these traditional hay Glenn/Colusa Counties; GLENN supplements become high, it becomes necessary to consider alternative A. NADER, University of feed sources. These alternative supplemental forages include high- California Cooperative Extension nutrient concentrates and fiber-based roughages, making it possible Livestock and Natural Resources Advisor Emeritus, Yuba/Sutter/ to form a complete ration to satisfy the nutrient and dry matter intake Butte Counties; JEFFERY W. requirements of cattle. STACKHOUSE, University of The prices of these feeds vary, so check the costs each time a supplemental ration is being California Cooperative Extension formulated. It is likely that the same supplemental ration will not be used two years in a row. Livestock and Natural Resources A ration balancing program such as Taurus, offered by the University of California, Davis, Advisor, Humboldt/Del Norte Department of Animal Science (see http://animalscience.ucdavis.edu/extension/Software/), is Counties a great tool for developing the lowest-cost supplement that meets the nutrient requirements of the particular class of cattle being supplemented.
    [Show full text]