DOCSLIB.ORG

2003 Legislative Manual

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2003 Legislative Manual LEGISLATIVE MANUAL State of Nevada SEVENTY-SECOND SESSION of the NEVADA LEGISLATURE 2003 CARSON CITY Nevada Legislative Counsel Bureau LEGISLATIVE MANUAL Page ii LEGISLATIVE MANUAL INTRODUCTION The Nevada Legislative Manual, required under Nevada Revised Statutes 218.647, is produced each biennium by the Legislative Counsel Bureau. It is designed primarily as a reference tool for legislators. However, it is also intended for use by members of the executive and judicial branches of government, representatives of private interest groups, and interested citizens. The manual contains information pertaining to legislative structure and procedures, Legislative Counsel Bureau staff services, and administrative details for legislators. It also includes the structure and personnel of the executive and judicial branches of government. Suggestions for corrections or improvements of the manual are welcome and should be directed to the Research Division, Legislative Counsel Bureau. The Flag of the Legislature of the State of Nevada At its 1967 Session, the Legislature of the State of Nevada adopted an official flag, which flies outside the Legislative Building whenever the Senate and Assembly are in session. The flag was designed by the senior government class of Tonopah High School. Page iii LEGISLATIVE MANUAL Page iv LEGISLATIVE MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER I—MEMBERS OF THE NEVADA LEGISLATURE....................... 1 Biographies of Members of the Nevada Senate ............................................ 3 Biographies of Members of the Nevada Assembly ....................................... 35 Members of the Nevada Legislature ............................................................. 85 Senate ................................................................................................. 87 Assembly ................................................................................................ 89 Members of the Nevada Legislature by District .................................... 93 Senate ............................................................................................. 93 Assembly ........................................................................................ 94 Interim Committees and Subcommittees (2001-2002) .......................... 95 Senate Standing Committees—2003...................................................... 103 Assembly Standing Committees—2003 ................................................ 105 CHAPTER II—LEGISLATIVE STRUCTURE, FINANCIAL OPERATION, AND RESPONSIBILITIES ........................................... 107 Legislative Terminology................................................................................ 109 The Legislative Structure .............................................................................. 109 Size and Apportionment ......................................................................... 110 2001 Reapportionment and Redistricting ....................................... 110 Membership Qualifications .................................................................... 111 Vacancies................................................................................................ 112 Officers and Employees ......................................................................... 112 Interest Groups and Media ..................................................................... 113 Press................................................................................................ 113 Lobbyists ........................................................................................ 113 Legislative Powers, Privileges, and Responsibilities .................................... 114 Legislator Duties .................................................................................... 114 Privileges and Immunities ...................................................................... 116 Limitations on the Legislative Power .................................................... 116 Crimes Against the Legislative Power ................................................... 118 Contracts in Which a Legislator Has an Interest.................................... 118 Ethics and Conflict of Interest ............................................................... 119 Reporting of Campaign Contributions and Expenses ............................ 120 Financial Disclosure ............................................................................... 121 Financial Operation of the Legislature .......................................................... 121 Legislative Fund ..................................................................................... 121 Legislator Compensation and Allowances ............................................. 121 Legislators’ Retirement .......................................................................... 122 Compensation of Employees ................................................................. 123 Endnotes for Chapter II ................................................................................. 125 Page v LEGISLATIVE MANUAL Page CHAPTER III—LEGISLATIVE PROCEDURE AND ACTION ........................ 129 Legislative Procedure .................................................................................... 131 Sessions ................................................................................................. 131 Legislative Leadership ........................................................................... 132 Legislative Officers: Senate .......................................................... 132 Legislative Officers: Assembly ..................................................... 133 Floor Leaders .................................................................................. 134 Procedure and Order of Business in the Senate and Assembly ............. 135 Quorum ................................................................................................. 135 Order of Business ................................................................................... 135 The Legislature in Action: A Bill Becomes a Law ....................................... 136 Organizing the Legislature ..................................................................... 137 Bill Drafting ........................................................................................... 138 Prefiling of Bills ..................................................................................... 139 Fiscal Notes ............................................................................................ 139 Introduction and First Reading .............................................................. 140 Committees ............................................................................................ 141 Standing Committees...................................................................... 141 Committee of the Whole ................................................................ 143 Select Committees and Conference Committees ........................... 143 Committee Hearing ................................................................................ 144 Notice of Bills, Topics, and Public Hearings ......................................... 144 Consent Calendar ................................................................................... 145 Second Reading...................................................................................... 145 General File and Third Reading ............................................................. 146 In the Other House and Conference Committees................................... 147 Deadlines for Legislation ....................................................................... 147 Enrollment .............................................................................................. 147 Gubernatorial Action .............................................................................. 148 Effective Date of the Bill ....................................................................... 148 Adoption or Passage of Resolutions ...................................................... 148 Petitions and Memorials......................................................................... 149 Nonlegislative Initiatives to Change Statutes or the Nevada Constitution ................................................................. 149 Distinction Among Types of Legislation....................................................... 150 Bill .......................................................................................................... 150 Skeleton Bill ........................................................................................... 150 Joint Resolution...................................................................................... 150 Concurrent Resolution ........................................................................... 150 One-House Resolution ........................................................................... 151 Endnotes for Chapter III ................................................................................ 152 Page vi LEGISLATIVE MANUAL Page CHAPTER IV—LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL BUREAU AND LEGISLATIVE BUILDING .................................................................. 157 The Legislative Counsel Bureau ................................................................... 159 Legislative Commission ......................................................................... 160 Interim Finance Committee ..................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2019 Nevada Legislative Manual: Chapter I—Members of the Nevada Legislature
    LEGISLATIVE MANUAL CHAPTER I MEMBERS OF THE NEVADA LEGISLATURE LEGISLATIVE MANUAL BIOGRAPHIES OF MEMBERS OF THE NEVADA SENATE LEGISLATIVE BIOGRAPHY — 2019 SESSION LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR AND PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE KATE MARSHALL Democrat Born: 1959 – San Francisco, California Educated: University of California, Berkeley, B.A., Political Science/English; University of California, Berkeley, School of Law, J.D. Married: Elliott Parker Children: Anna, Molly Hobbies/Special Interests: Hiking, family sporting events LEGISLATIVE SERVICE Served in 1 Regular Session Years in Senate: First elected Lieutenant Governor, November 2018 President of the Senate, 2019 to Current Page 5 LEGISLATIVE BIOGRAPHY — 2019 SESSION KELVIN D. ATKINSON Democrat Senate District 4 Clark County (part) Small Business Owner Born: 1969 – Chicago, Illinois Educated: Culver City High School; Howard University, Washington, D.C.; University of Nevada, Las Vegas Children: Haley Hobbies/Special Interests: Reading, watching the Raiders and Lakers, studying politics, traveling LEGISLATIVE SERVICE Served in 9 Regular Sessions and 12 Special Sessions Years in Assembly: November 2002 to November 2012 Years in Senate: November 2012 to Current Leadership: Assembly Senior Chief Deputy Whip, 2011 Senate Co-Minority Whip, 2015 and 2015 Special Session Senate Assistant Minority Floor Leader, 2016 Special Session Senate Assistant Majority Floor Leader, 2017 Senate Majority Leader, 2019 Legislative Commission: 2013; 2015; 2017 Interim Finance Committee: 2011 Assembly Committees: Commerce and
    [Show full text]
  • Newly Elected Representatives in the 114Th Congress
    Newly Elected Representatives in the 114th Congress Contents Representative Gary Palmer (Alabama-6) ....................................................................................................... 3 Representative Ruben Gallego (Arizona-7) ...................................................................................................... 4 Representative J. French Hill (Arkansas-2) ...................................................................................................... 5 Representative Bruce Westerman (Arkansas-4) .............................................................................................. 6 Representative Mark DeSaulnier (California-11) ............................................................................................. 7 Representative Steve Knight (California-25) .................................................................................................... 8 Representative Peter Aguilar (California-31) ................................................................................................... 9 Representative Ted Lieu (California-33) ........................................................................................................ 10 Representative Norma Torres (California-35) ................................................................................................ 11 Representative Mimi Walters (California-45) ................................................................................................ 12 Representative Ken Buck (Colorado-4) .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Prayer Practices
    Floor Action 5-145 Prayer Practices Legislatures operate with a certain element of pomp, ceremony and procedure that flavor the institution with a unique air of tradition and theatre. The mystique of the opening ceremonies and rituals help to bring order and dignity to the proceedings. One of these opening ceremonies is the offering of a prayer. Use of legislative prayer. The practice of opening legislative sessions with prayer is long- standing. The custom draws its roots from both houses of the British Parliament, which, according to noted parliamentarian Luther Cushing, from time ”immemorial” began each day with a “reading of the prayers.” In the United States, this custom has continued without interruption at the federal level since the first Congress under the Constitution (1789) and for more than a century in many states. Almost all state legislatures still use an opening prayer as part of their tradition and procedure (see table 02-5.50). In the Massachusetts Senate, a prayer is offered at the beginning of floor sessions for special occasions. Although the use of an opening prayer is standard practice, the timing of when the prayer occurs varies (see table 02-5.51). In the majority of legislative bodies, the prayer is offered after the floor session is called to order, but before the opening roll call is taken. Prayers sometimes are given before floor sessions are officially called to order; this is true in the Colorado House, Nebraska Senate and Ohio House. Many chambers vary on who delivers the prayer. Forty-seven chambers allow people other than the designated legislative chaplain or a visiting chaplain to offer the opening prayer (see table 02-5.52).
    [Show full text]
  • State Trends: Legislative Victories From
    State Trends ARIZONA COLORADO CONNECTICUT DELAWARE GEORGIA ILLINOIS INDIANA MAINE MISSISSIPPI NEVADA NEW YORK OREGON PENNSYLVANIA TEXAS UTAH VIRGINIA WaSHINGTON ARIZONA COLORADO CONNECTICUT DELAWARE GEORGIA ILLINOIS INDIANA MAINE MISSISSIPPI NEVADA NEW YORK OREGON PENNSYLVANIA TEXAS UTAH VIRGINIA WaSHINGTON ARIZONA COLORADO CONNECTICUT DELAWARE GEORGIA ILLINOIS INDIANA MAINE MISSISSIPPI NEVADA NEW YORK OREGON PENNSYLVANIA TEXAS UTAH VIRGINIA WaSHINGTON ARIZONA COLORADO CONNECTICUT DELAWARE GEORGIA ILLINOIS INDIANA MAINE MISSISSIPPI NEVADA NEW YORK OREGON PENNSYLVANIA TEXAS UTAH VIRGINIA WaSHINGTON ARIZONA COLORADO CONNECTICUT DELAWARE GEORGIA ILLINOIS INDIANA MAINE MISSISSIPPI NEVADA NEW YORK OREGON PENNSYLVANIA TEXAS UTAH VIRGINIA WaSHINGTON ARIZONA COLORADO CONNECTICUT DELAWARE GEORGIA ILLINOIS INDIANA MAINE MISSISSIPPI NEVADA NEW YORK OREGON PENNSYLVANIA TEXAS UTAH VIRGINIA WaSHINGTON ARIZONA COLORADO CONNECTICUT DELAWARE GEORGIA ILLINOIS INDIANA Legislative Victories from 2005 to 2010 Removing Youth from the Adult Criminal Justice System The Campaign for Youth Justice (CFYJ) is a national organization dedicated to ending the practice of prosecuting, sentencing, and incarcerating youth under the age of 18 in the adult criminal justice system. CFYJ dedicates this report to the thousands of young people and their families across the country who have been harmed by laws and policies of the criminal justice system; the Governors, State Legislators, State Officials, and Local Officials who championed these reforms; and the continuing efforts
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 & 2022 Legislative Battlegrounds
    TO: Interested Parties FROM: DLCC President Jessica Post DATE: March 16, 2021 RE: 2021 & 2022 Legislative Battlegrounds The 2020 wave that earned Democrats the federal trifecta revealed a fundamental truth about modern politics: Democrats cannot count on national momentum to have a decisive impact on state legislative elections. While 2020 fell short of the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee’s ambitious goals, we made significant progress in state legislatures during the Trump administration. We flipped eight chambers and hundreds of seats red to blue. We transformed the DLCC from an understaffed, underfunded organization to a $51 million committee that is now the largest Democratic spender in the state legislative space. Heading into the 2020 election, Republicans had maps rigged in their favor, significantly more resources, and incumbency advantage. An unexpected surge of Trump voters led to sufficient Republican overperformance to overwhelm many Democratic candidates in already difficult districts. Almost immediately in this new year, Republican lawmakers reminded us why even with a Democratic trifecta in the federal government, it is a strategic imperative for Democrats to win back state legislatures. At least 500 Republican lawmakers tried to help Trump illegally overturn the presidential election and amplified his claims of a stolen election. More than a dozen were in Washington for the January 6 insurrection rally. Republicans in at least 43 states are mounting an unprecedented assault on voting rights—with the assistance and coordination of the Republican State Leadership Committee—and they’re openly admitting that gerrymandering is their path back to control of Congress. Democrats made significant progress in undermining Republican dominance in state legislative elections.
    [Show full text]
  • State Education Policies
    State Education Policy Tracking We compile information on education policies from We have been researching education legislation for more than 25 years. Summaries early childhood through of enacted and vetoed legislation — from early postsecondary education learning through postsecondary education and from the early 1990s through 2016 — are and workforce, so state accessible on our website. policymakers can make Our one-of-a-kind State STATE EDUCATION POLICY TRACKING informed decisions. Education Policy Tracking 15,580 resource, launched in 2017, allows users to search 1,680 enacted and vetoed legislation across more than 45 education issues and 275 sub-issues. Search results BILLS PAGE SUMMARIZED VIEWS can be filtered by state and/ or issue and sub-issue, or by keywords found in the bill titles. In 2018, our staff summarized 1,680 bills for this resource. The State Education Policy Tracking resource received more than 15,580 pageviews in 2018. In 2018 we began closely STATE EDUCATION POLICY WATCH LIST monitoring policy action 3,930 in a few issue areas and updating a new resource, 850 the State Education Policy Watch List, with pending, enacted and vetoed bills. We BILLS PAGE tracked about 850 bills from TRACKED VIEWS introduction related to need- and merit-based financial aid, postsecondary governance, career and technical education, dual enrollment, and teacher certification and licensure. The State Education Policy Watch List resource received more than 3,930 pageviews in 2018. 2 www.ecs.org | @EdCommission 50-State Comparisons State Information Requests Our issue-specific50-State Comparisons allow One of the most unique and valued ways we policymakers to compare their states' laws assist state education leaders is by responding against other states on topics such as teacher to State Information Requests with personalized license reciprocity, open enrollment, statewide research, typically within 24 hours.
    [Show full text]
  • Nevada Legislators 1861-2013
    Nevada Legislators 1861–2013 April 2013 Compiled by the Research Library Research Division Legislative Counsel Bureau This publication was compiled by the Research Library of the Research Division of the Legislative Counsel Bureau based on information from the: 1. Legislative Research Library 2. Division of State Library and Archives, Department of Administration 3. Secretary of State 4. Nevada Historical Society Additional information, corrections, and suggestions are invited. Please contact us at [email protected]. Cover photographs (left to right): •1897 Members of the Nevada State Senate (Courtesy of the Nevada State Library and Archives) •1960 Members of the Nevada State Senate (Courtesy of the Nevada State Library and Archives) •1991 Members of the Nevada State Assembly (Legislative Research Library Photo Collection) Photograph on this page: •1977 Senate Hearing Room (Legislative Research Library Photo Collection) Nevada Legislators 1861–2013 April 2013 Compiled by the Research Library Research Division Legislative Counsel Bureau Table of Contents Nevada Legislators 1861–2013 (Alphabetical by Last Name) 1 Key to Table 87 Appendices 89 Selected Officers of the Nevada Legislature, 1864–2013 91 Legislators Appointed to Fill Vacancies in the Nevada Legislature, 1945–2013 99 Nevada Legislative Counsel Bureau Staff Directors, 1945–2013 101 Secretaries of the Senate and Chief Clerks of the Assembly, 1864–2013 107 Last Name First Name County1 Party2 Years in Years in Special Comments Gender Leadership Memorial Year of Assembly3 Senate3 Death Abraham T. W. ES U Nov 1868-Nov 1870 Male 1875 *R Nov 1870-Nov 1872* Ackerman George B. MI D Nov 1916-Nov 1918 Male 1947 (A.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Advocacy Handbook – 2017 Edition 1 | P a G E
    LEGISLATIVE ABSTRACT [Draw your reader in with an engaging abstract. It is typically a short summary of the document. ADVOCACY When you’re ready to add your content, just click here and start typing.] Kimberly Mull HANDBOOK Policy Specialist 2017 Edition Contents Disclaimer ................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Lobbying ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Nonprofits Can and Should Lobby ................................................................................................................................ 6 Federal Rights & Restrictions ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Federal Law Protects Nonprofit Advocacy & Lobbying ................................................................................. 6 United States Constitution ......................................................................................................................................... 6 United States Congress ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Amicus Brief
    No. 18-217 ================================================================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- RANDALL MATHENA, WARDEN, Petitioner, v. LEE BOYD MALVO, Respondent. --------------------------------- --------------------------------- On Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Fourth Circuit --------------------------------- --------------------------------- BRIEF OF FORMER WV DELEGATE JOHN ELLEM, FORMER HI REP. KAREN AWANA, HI REP. JOHN MIZUNO, NV ASSEMBLYMAN JOHN HAMBRICK, VT REP. BARBARA RACHELSON, UT REP. V. LOWRY SNOW, AR SEN. MISSY IRVIN, AND AR SEN. GREG LEDING AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENT --------------------------------- --------------------------------- JOHN ELLEM Counsel of Record V. L OWRY SNOW JAMES L. DOLD SUZANNE S. LA PIERRE HUMAN RIGHTS FOR KIDS P.O. Box 5960 Washington, D.C. 20016 (304) 588-1089 [email protected] Counsel for Amici Curiae August 27, 2019 ================================================================================================================ COCKLE LEGAL BRIEFS (800) 225-6964 WWW.COCKLELEGALBRIEFS.COM i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ................................... iii INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE ............................ 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ................................ 2 ARGUMENT ........................................................... 5 I. STATE LEGISLATORS OF DIVERSE POLITICAL IDEOLOGIES
    [Show full text]
  • A Tale of Two Bills Nevada's Breakfast After the Bell- a Legislative Case
    A TALE OF TWO BILLS NEVADA’S BREAKFAST AFTER THE BELL A LEGISLATION CASE STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 4 Overview of lessons learned Figure 1: Map of Nevada’s school districts Breakfast Legislation Timeline 9 Figure 2: Timeline of state breakfast policies considered in legislature 10 I. Agents of Change and Dynamic Leaders II. Policy Landscape 14 Alignment to education priorities Alignment to state financial priorities Party affiliation II. Stakeholders 17 Strength of stakeholders Capacity and diversity of stakeholders Figure 3: Engaged stakeholders in Nevada breakfast bills Vetting policy concepts with stakeholders Summary 26 Appendix A: Sources – Page 28 Appendix B: Detailed timeline, 2011-2015 – Page 29 Appendix C: Governor’s Council on Food Security members and their positions, 2014-2015 – Page 33 Appendix D: Comparison of breakfast legislation in Nevada – Page 35 This report is for Share Our Strength’s No Kid Hungry Campaign whose mission is to end childhood hunger in America by ensuring all children get the healthy food they need every day. Author: BP2 Solutions. Design: eurie creative. Contributors: Three Square Food Bank, Nevada Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Food Security, Governor’s Council on Food Security. 2 | A Tale of Two Bills A Legislation Case Study | 3 In Nevada, lawmakers took up the issue The factors that influenced this shift are of BAB in the 2011 and 2015 legislative presented in this legislative case study. sessions, working to implement a state policy requirement for selected schools. Understanding the Success The final 2015 law requires schools with 70 of Nevada’s Efforts percent or more students enrolled in free or Anti-hunger advocates are keen to better reduced price meals to provide breakfast understand the factors that influence to students after the instructional day has decision-making on state policies in officially begun.
    [Show full text]
  • Political History of Nevada: Chapter 3
    Political History of Nevada Chapter 3 Historical and Political Data 91 CHAPTER 3: HISTORICAL AND POLITICAL DATA Historical and Political Data: Territorial Governments Through Statehood Reviewed and Updated by ART PALMER Former Research Director of the Legislative Counsel Bureau (LCB) and Former Director of the LCB GUY ROCHA Former Nevada State Archivist ROBERT E. ERICKSON Former Research Director of the LCB In the beginning, the region now occupied by the State of Nevada was held by Data Historical the Goshute, Mojave, Paiute, Shoshone and Washoe Indians and claimed by the Spanish Empire until the early 1800s. Th e northern extent of the Spanish claim was defi ned as the 42nd parallel in the Adams-Onis Treaty of 1819 between the United States and Spain. Th is north latitude line serves currently as Nevada’s northern boundary with Oregon and Idaho. Spanish explorations into this region have never been documented clearly enough to establish any European party constituting the earliest expedition into Nevada. If in fact there was some penetration, it must have been by the Spanish in the southernmost portion of our state, possibly as early as 1776. In 1821 Mexico won its war of independence from Spain and gained control over all the former Spanish territory in the area of what is now our “South-West.” Spain had done nothing to occupy or control what is now Nevada, a vast region virtually “terra incognita,” having no permanent non-Indian population and considered barren, arid and inhospitable. Quite understandably, the Spanish concentrated on settlements and nominal control in the more accessible and better-known coastal regions of the Californias and New Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • TASK FORCE on AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES Framing the Future for Autonomous Vehicles in Oregon
    TASK FORCE ON AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES Framing the Future for Autonomous Vehicles in Oregon Memorandum To: Oregon Task Force on Autonomous Vehicles, Subcommittee on Vehicle Code and Safety From: ODOT Staff Date: July 23, 2019 Re: Reference Materials Introduction This document is a compilation of the studies and references used or discussed in the Subcommittee on Vehicle Code and Safety. It also includes some relevant documents collected by ODOT staff and subcommittee members. This list is supposed to help policymakers carry out further research and to demonstrate some of the grounding for the subcommittee’s work products. References Automated and Connected Vehicles: A Legal and Regulatory Roadmap O’Melveny https://www.omm.com/avl Autonomous Vehicles: Self-Driving Vehicles Enacted Legislation National Conference of State Legislatures http://www.ncsl.org/research/transportation/autonomous-vehicles-self-driving-vehicles-enacted- legislation.aspx Law Enforcement Protocol for Fully Autonomous Vehicles Arizona Department of Transportation https://azdot.gov/docs/default-source/motor-vehicle-services/law-enforcement-protocol.pdf?sfvrsn=4 Nuro Arizona Law Enforcement Protocol for Fully Autonomous Vehicles Nuro https://images.phoenixnewtimes.com/media/pdf/nuro-law-enforcement-protocol_redacted.pdf Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles J3016_201806 International Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) https://www.sae.org/standards/content/j3016_201806/ Waymo Full Self-Driving Chrysler Pacifica:
    [Show full text]