DOCSLIB.ORG

Anita Bryant: Vilio'us Andobs~!!!~N~ .~

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Anita Bryant: Vilio'us Andobs~!!!~N~ .~ -'- NUMBER 56 25 CENTS-:iIi:i» ..... c· __ · .. -- ; \. JULY IAUGUST 1977 '- f Black Students Defy.· Vorsfer Apartheid Terror '- Stalks Soweto Resurgent mass protest and brutal police./ the self-pr?claimed representatives of the Soweto' violence marked the first anniversary of the masses. murder of 13-year-old Hector Peterson by Prime In response, police showered the protestors MinisterB.J. Vorster's stormtroopers in Soweto with tear gas and hails of shot gun pellets, last June 16. , leaving at least three wounded. The following Tens of thousands of black workers stayed day, however, the government backed down and away from work as black youths -demonstrated deferred the. rent increases, and charges 'w~re in commemoration of the Soweto mass,acre dropped against 49 arrested students.' which sparked the continuing revolt' that has Two weeks later, on May 10, another series rocked South Africa and left more than 600 of protests begaI) as hundreds of student~ walked blacks and "Coloureds" (those of mixed race) out of Soweto's' OrlandO High School and three dead, martyred by apartheid terror. Despite other schools, calling for· an end to the system the peaceful' character of the meetings and of' "Bantu education". The students again con­ school boycotts_ organized by Soweto youth over fronted the UBC, demanding that two students the preceeding weeks, the Vorster regime un­ detained in the April 28 demonstrations be leashed its murderous armed guards on the released. By the beginning of June, the increasing protesting st~ents. p ~e~sur.E! ..9t. tl,),~ .• ~o1Yt}io .~WAA.¢,~¥t~,lile~~~~> Council (SSRC) haCt· forced the ma1brltyof tIle The June 16 commemoration followed a rising ~BC to resign. - . series of militant demonstrations against the hellish conditions of everyday life of non-whites Soweto Under Mart'al law under apartheid. On April 28, chanting "Away With High Rents, " and· "We Will Not Pay," As June 16 approached, the South African 2,000 black high school students demonstrated police took measures to forestall any massive in Soweto against the openly punitive 30 to 80 black student· protests. On June 8 scores of perc'ent rent increases. The government-ordered black activists were arrested, including Mapapa measures for the Johannesburg-area black town­ Wauchope, the head of the Black Peoples Con-' ships were supposedly intended to "offsetlosses" vention, and Jackson Nkosiyane, the leader of incurred through the burning down of goverriment­ the Transkei opposition. On June 10 scattered owned shebeens (beer 'halls) during last year's deI!lonstrations by black youths and the stoning protests-but were rightly seen as another attack of vehicles immedi~ately led to further pOlice. on blacks in this overcrowded and squalid labor attacks. compound. The students also demanded the resig­ By June 13 paratroopers had surrounded nation of the quisling Urban Bantu Council (UBC­ Soweto and blO&ked the rgads leading in and' (South African 1'lot'cops (top) pump bullets end widely derid€a as· the', "Useless Boys' Club"), continued on page 5 tear gas Info protestlng'Soweto blacks (bottom). /' Anita Bryant: Vilio'us andObs~!!!~n~ .~ -:.~. June 26 demonstration in New York City drew an estimated 100,000 protestors to demand full democratic rights for homosexual!! ,-, 2. YOUNG SPARTACUS Editorial Nole' Carter Kills IT--.~'~"" ' -l.' ,.it Medicaid Abortions: ~'I'" .,' I 'j. I_ ~ ; ,' -, / ,""".... / High, Court t_ Vi i 'j I "N.. " 1-)"'"t . >" SeDleDees Poor .. \"'><. to Back-Alley Butchers Coat-hanger abortions by back-alley butchers It is necessary for the left and labor movement Supreme Court justices wrote the entire program have been widely regarded as a fading horror in '" and all concerned with defending democratic rights of WONAAC into law, and that was the end of the four years since the U.S. Supreme Court to oppose", these reactionary actions of Congress that "mass movement." legalized termination of pregnancy upon request. and the Supreme Court. These decisions target Yet to this day the SWP /YSA is opposed to But despite its all-purpose "human'rights" rhet­ the 'poor, the young, the uneducated and racial waging ~ struggle'to win free' abortion on demand. oric the Carter administration has just provided and ethnic minorities; 75 percent of the women In a major polemic against the SL/SYL which a boon for the bloody business of the kitchen- who die in home abortions are non-White. And appeared in Intercontinental Press exactly one table quaCks. .' these decisions can only embolden the reactionary, week before the SUpreme Court ruling prohibiting After publicly taking a "personal"standagainst "right-to-life" forces who have set tl1eir sights Medicaid abortions, the SWP again attacked us abortion, Carter recently succeeded in getting on nothing less than forcing through a COn­ for raising the slogan "Free Abortion on Demand" Congress and the Supreme Court to take actions stitutional amendment forbiddipg ail abortions. in WONAAC, arguing that this demand is "a good to halt government funding of abortions. As a Even though these recent moves by C,!ngress proposition that simply was not the issue at the result, many of the estimated 300,000 poor and and the SUpreme Court do not challenge legalized time." working women who every year obtain legal hos­ abortion, they were clearly in response, to the Instead, we are told that poor and working pital abortions funded through Medicaid will be grOwing pressure from reactionary "right-to­ women should be content to make do with Medicaid: left with only one "human right"-choosing be .. life" forces organized by outfits Uke the National "In a country such as the.United States, since the ~73 tween giving birth to unwanted children Or risk­ Rig~ to Life Committee and massively funded Supreme Court decision legalizing abortion, this has ingmutilation and even death at the hands of by the Catholic Church. Commenting on why so meant that abortion costs are coveted by government amateur and fly;'by-night abortionists. many libe~al Democrats recently changed sides social insurance and welfare programs and by many of the That "born-again" Baptist in the White House in the fight. over Medicaid abortions, Oregon private medical plans that most (!] U.S. workers and their no doubt claimed a great victory for "moral Senator Bob Packwood candidly stated, "To Pol­ families possess. This is not exactly free [!!] and there are government" when on June 29 the Senate voted iticians, they [the opponents of abortion] are a currently reactionary attempts to eliminate abortions in favor of a Carter-backed ame'ndment to a frightening force. They are peoplewbo are with from Medicaid coverage'; but legalization was a tremen' Health, Education and Welfare appropriations bill you 99 percent of the time, but if you \Tote against dous gain, nonetheless." that would prohibit Medicaid funding of abortions, them on this issue, it doesn't matter what else -Intercontinental Press, 13 June 1977 except in cases where pregnancy would endanger you stand for" (quoted in the New York Times. Pernaps these reformists are singiri'g a dif­ the' life of a mother or was the result of rape 1 July 1977). ferent tune after the Carter administration axed or incest. Earlier in June the House adopted an More ominous was the SUpreme Court ruling, Medicaid abortions? No, indeed! Even now the even stiffer amendment to the same bill, for­ which' came very close to adopting the Vatican SWP /YSA maintains that free abortion on demand biUding federal funding of any abortion, even when. position that abortion is a "moral" issue. In the is "not the .issue. 11 Search as you will, the call for deemed "medically necessary." , majority decision of the Court, Justice Lewis' \ free abortion on demand is nowhere to be found in " Although the Senate rejected a similar ban Powell stated that it was acceptable for states the lengthy statement issued by the SWP /YSA in last year, Congressional opposition to publicly "to make a value judgement favoring childbirth response to the Supreme Court ruling against funded abortions gained momentum after the over abortion, and to implement that judgement by Medicaid abortions (Militant, 1 July 1977). Supreme Court ruled on June 20 that states had the allocation of public funds." And only a few Just as in WONAAC, so today the SWP/YSA thE! right to prohibit Medicaid abortions. Already days after this. ruling the Court 'Ya'rmed. the heart places its appetites to wheel and deal in the 15 states have laws on the books forbidCiling of the Catholic Church even more by ruling that bourgeois-feminist, red-baiting National Organi­ government funding of "non-therapeutic" abor­ states could increase their aid to parochial zation for Women (NOW) higher than its supposed tions, and more and more states are follOwing schools. commitment to struggle for the needs of working suit. \ The legalization of abortion by the Supreme women. Women may be forced to resort to the Court in 1973 represented a real gain bene­ back-alley butchers in even greater numbers than fitting women and their struggle for democratic, before, but toe SWP /YSA is not about to risk rights. But even that hard-won reform fell far alienating would-be liberal allies by championing short of meeting basic needs of the masses of so "radical" ~ demand as free abortion. (If NOW poor and working women: the right to legal or s( ,me liberal Democrats were to pick up tht! abortion is' a cruel hoax for the welfare mothers demand for their own purposes, then the SWP/YSA who can't afford the medical costs or the Southern could indeed be counted on to at last decide that woman, who can't find a hospital or a doctor free abortion was now-"the issue.") Thus, the willing to provide the service.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Outrageous Opinion, Democratic Deliberation, and Hustler Magazine V
    VOLUME 103 JANUARY 1990 NUMBER 3 HARVARD LAW REVIEW THE CONSTITUTIONAL CONCEPT OF PUBLIC DISCOURSE: OUTRAGEOUS OPINION, DEMOCRATIC DELIBERATION, AND HUSTLER MAGAZINE V. FALWELL Robert C. Post TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE I. HUSTLER MAGAZINE V. FALWELL ........................................... 6o5 A. The Background of the Case ............................................. 6o6 B. The Supreme Court Opinion ............................................. 612 C. The Significance of the Falwell Opinion: Civility and Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress ..................................................... 616 11. THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND PUBLIC DISCOURSE ............................. 626 A. Public Discourse and Community ........................................ 627 B. The Structure of Public Discourse ............... ..................... 633 C. The Nature of Critical Interaction Within Public Discourse ................. 638 D. The First Amendment, Community, and Public Discourse ................... 644 Im. PUBLIC DISCOURSE AND THE FALIWELL OPINION .............................. 646 A. The "Outrageousness" Standard .......................................... 646 B. The Distinction Between Speech and Its Motivation ........................ 647 C. The Distinction Between Fact and Opinion ............................... 649 i. Some Contemporary Understandings of the Distinction Between Fact and Opinion ............................................................ 650 (a) Rhetorical Hyperbole ............................................. 650 (b)
    [Show full text]
  • California Hard Core
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title California Hard Core Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0g37b09q Author Duong, Joseph Lam Publication Date 2014 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California California Hard Core By Joseph Lam Duong A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Waldo E. Martin, Chair Professor Kerwin Lee Klein Professor Linda Williams Spring 2014 Copyright 2014 by Joseph Lam Duong Abstract California Hard Core by Joseph Lam Duong Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Berkeley Professor Waldo E. Martin, Chair California Hard Core is a narrative history of the pornographic film industry in California from 1967 to 1978, a moment when Americans openly made, displayed, and watched sexually explicit films. Two interrelated questions animate this project: Who moved the pornographic film from the margins of society to the mainstream of American film culture? What do their stories tell us about sex and sexuality in the U.S. in the last third of the twentieth century? The earlier academic literature concentrates on pornographic film and political debates surrounding it rather than industry participants and their contexts. The popular literature, meanwhile, is composed almost entirely of book-length oral histories and autobiographies of filmmakers and models. California Hard Core helps to close the divide between these two literatures by documenting not only an eye-level view of work from behind the camera, on the set, and in the movie theater, but also the ways in which consumers received pornographic films, placing the reader in the viewing position of audience members, police officers, lawyers, judges, and anti-pornography activists.
    [Show full text]
  • Commentary on Larry Flynt's Role in the Free Speech Debate
    Washington and Lee University School of Law Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons Scholarly Articles Faculty Scholarship 2010 First Amendment Martyr, First Amendment Opportunist: Commentary on Larry Flynt's Role in the Free Speech Debate Rodney A. Smolla Furman University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlufac Part of the First Amendment Commons Recommended Citation Rodney A. Smolla, First Amendment Martyr, First Amendment Opportunist: Commentary on Larry Flynt's Role in the Free Speech Debate, 9 First Amend. L. Rev. 1 (2010-2011). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scholarly Articles by an authorized administrator of Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. +(,121/,1( Citation: 9 First Amend. L. Rev. 1 2010-2011 Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline (http://heinonline.org) Fri Sep 13 12:46:54 2013 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License -- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text. FIRST AMENDMENT MARTYR, FIRST AMENDMENT OPPORTUNIST: COMMENTARY ON LARRY FLYNT'S ROLE IN THE FREE SPEECH DEBATE* RODNEY A. SMOLLA Good afternoon and thanks for staying. I'll begin with a little story. If you watch the movie The People vs. Larry Flynt,' there's a fictional scene in the movie that I want to use as my theme.
    [Show full text]
  • Gay Era (Lancaster, PA)
    LGBT History Project of the LGBT Center of Central PA Located at Dickinson College Archives & Special Collections http://archives.dickinson.edu/ Documents Online Title: Gay Era (Lancaster, PA) Date: May 1977 Location: LGBT-001 Joseph W. Burns Collection Periodicals Collection Contact: LGBT History Project Archives & Special Collections Waidner-Spahr Library Dickinson College P.O. Box 1773 Carlisle, PA 17013 717-245-1399 [email protected] vol.3 no.3 5Oc MAY 1977 inside: FLORIDA FOLLIES DISH DEMONS Barry Kohn & William Kaff Staff Deserts Office to Fly Kites BLANK PAGES and more items in questionable taste 3 WHAT IS OBSCENITY? This question will haunt the lives of every citi­ THE POLITICS OF GOVERNMENT. ITS SUPPRESSION IS EN­ zen IN THIS COUNTRY UNTIL IT IS FINALLY RESOLVED OR TWINED WITH ATTEMPTS TO REGULATE HUMAN BEHAVIOR THE WORD IS COMPLETELY DISCARDED. THROUGH CONTROL OF IMAGERY, ARE WE GOING TO GIVE After recently reading countless articles regard­ THE GOVERNMENT THE POWER TO BECOME MORAL POLICEMEN? ing THE CASES OF LARRY FlYNT, PUBLISHER OF HUSTLER The DEBATE IN THE LITERARY FIELD CONTINUES:CONTINUES HOW magazine, Al Goldstein, publisher of Screw magazine, FAR SHOULD THE FIRST AMENDMENT BE APPLIED? Ml1EAN- and Harry Reems who starred in Deep Ihroat, I can while, Larry Flynt will be in jail. only reflect on the incident that took place when n Harry Reems; , ."Deep Throat s” pretty. Harry the Gay Era took the January issue to our printer. Reems was paid $1UO to._ star. .............. in "___Deep Ihroat" WITHi I WILL TRY TO OUTLINE THE FOUR CASES AS BRIEFLY Linda Lovelace.
    [Show full text]
  • Jerry Falwell V. Larry Flynt: the Irsf T Amendment on Trial
    University of Minnesota Law School Scholarship Repository Constitutional Commentary 1990 Book Review: Jerry Falwell V. Larry Flynt: The irsF t Amendment on Trial. by Rodney A. Smolla. L.A. Jr. Powe Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/concomm Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Powe, L.A. Jr., "Book Review: Jerry Falwell V. Larry Flynt: The irF st Amendment on Trial. by Rodney A. Smolla." (1990). Constitutional Commentary. 593. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/concomm/593 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Minnesota Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Constitutional Commentary collection by an authorized administrator of the Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1990] BOOK REVIEW 127 another fundamental way. The paradigm suggests that politicians want to do what most citizens want, and that they as much as the citizenry feel injured when the Court strikes down controversial statutes, or at least that they are likely to retaliate against the Court for offending their constituents. An alternative hypothesis is that Congress wants a powerful Supreme Court, even if-perhaps some­ times especially if-the Court makes politically unpopular deci­ sions. The Supreme Court is Congress's lightning rod. The real reason Congress is reluctant to whip the Supreme Court in the wake of controversial decisions is not that the Court has more power or prestige than Congress can control. Quite the contrary. The Court shields the members of both Congress and the state legislatures from the need to make politically unpopular decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Golden Age of Porn: Nostalgia and History in Cinema Susanna Paasonen and Laura Saarenmaa
    Pornification 19/7/07 10:56 am Page 23 –2– The Golden Age of Porn: Nostalgia and History in Cinema Susanna Paasonen and Laura Saarenmaa The mainstreaming of pornography is indebted to the success of feature-length hardcore films of the 1970s. Shot on 35 mm film, productions such as Deep Throat (1972), Behind the Green Door (1972), The Devil in Miss Jones (1973), The Opening of Misty Beethoven (1976) and Debbie Does Dallas (1978) were widely screened both in the USA and internationally. These films have since been estab- lished as classics (Buscombe 2004: 30) and milestones in both scholarly and popular porn historiographies. While some identify the so-called ‘golden age of porn’ through North American legislation and as ranging from 1957 from 1973 (Lane 2000: 22–3), it was in the 1970s and early 1980s that porn shifted towards the mainstream. In a trend titled by the New York Times as porno chic, pornography became fashionable, gained mainstream publicity and popularity (McNair 2002: 62–3; Schaefer 2004: 371; Wyatt 1999). During the past decade, this golden age has been reminisced in films such as People Vs. Larry Flynt (1996), Boogie Nights (1997) and Rated X (2000), numerous documentaries – including the critically acclaimed Inside Deep Throat (2005) – and books.1 This body of popular porn historiography depicts the decade as one of quality films with real stories, personal performers and talented directors, in contrast to the 1980s of video distribution, inflation of the porn industry, rise of AIDS and conservative backlash. With notable exceptions such as the French Le pornographe (2001) and the Spanish–Danish co-production Torremolinos 73 (2003), European histories have not been reminisced to the same degree.
    [Show full text]
  • Murder, Media, and Mayhem: the Metamorphosis of California Murder Cases to International Media Sensations
    Murder, Media, and Mayhem: The Metamorphosis of California Murder Cases to International Media Sensations By: Olivia Cusimano Advisor: Richard Perry Undergraduate Legal Studies Honors Thesis University of California, Berkeley 1 “Sometimes the power of the media, the power of the movie, can be very subtle and great.” -James Blatt, Attorney for Jesse James Hollywood I would like to take a moment to thank all those who helped me take an idea grown while watching Investigation Discovery on the couch and develop it into this project. From the initial guidance of Professor Musheno and Christina Carbone to the astute guidance of my advisor, Professor Perry, I am forever thankful. My family, too, has supported me mentally and even intellectually. To my Aunt Diane, I owe you so much for your direction and insight. I never would have parsed out a coherent thesis without our conversations at The Natural Café. Additionally, a never-ending thanks to those who supported me, made sure I didn’t give up, and listened to my unending laments without disowning me: Kent, Mike, Brendan, Safeena, Dani the entire Student Advocate’s Office, and everyone else who spent any iota of time listening to my laments. 2 Table of Contents I. Abstract……………………………………………………………………...…….4 II. Introduction……………………………………………………………………...5 III. Literature Review………………………………………………………………6 IV. Methodology…………………………………………………………………...17 V. Findings and Analysis………………………………………………………….21 i. Charles Manson………………………………………………………... ii. Scott Peterson…………………………………………………………… iii. Jesse James Hollywood………………………………………………… VI. Synthesis and Limitations…………………………………………………….. VII. Conclusions…………………………………………………………………….. VII. Works Cited…………………………………………………………………….. 3 I. Abstract This project seeks to explore how and why certain cases are sensationalized, by tracing the movement of the cases through various media outlets.
    [Show full text]
  • IN the SUPREME COURT of OHIO HDV CLEVELAND, LLC, Dba Larry
    Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed February 22, 2018 - Case No. 2018-0114 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO HDV CLEVELAND, LLC, dba Larry : Case No. 2018-0114 Flynt’s Hustler Club : : On Appeal from the Appellant, : Franklin County : Court of Appeals, vs. : Tenth Appellate District : OHIO LIQUOR CONTROL : Court of Appeals Case COMMISSION, : No. 17AP-362 : Appellee. ______________________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPPOSING JURISDICTION ______________________________________________________________________________ J Michael Murray (0019626) Mike DeWine (0009181) *Counsel of Record Attorney General of Ohio Steven D. Shafron (0039042) Berkman, Gordon, Murray, & DeVan Charles Febus (0063213) 55 Public Square, Suite 2200 Anthony J. Garcia (0097135) Cleveland, Ohio 44113 Assistant Attorneys General Tel: 216-781-5245 Charitable Law Section Fax: 216-781-8207 150 East Gay Street, 23rd Floor [email protected] Columbus, Ohio 43215-3130 [email protected] Tel: 614-466-4513 Fax: 614-728-4548 Counsel for Appellant [email protected] HDV Cleveland, LLC dba Larry Flynt’s [email protected] Hustler Club Counsel for Appellee Ohio Liquor Control Commission TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGES TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ..................................................................................... iii, iv INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................1 STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND OF THE FACTS .................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • How Hugh Hefner's World Helped Donald Trump Get Into the White House
    04/10/2017 How Hugh Hefner's world helped Donald Trump get into the White House Academic rigour, journalistic flair How Hugh Hefner’s world helped Donald Trump get into the White House September 29, 2017 3.26pm BST PA/Archive Hugh Hefner, who has died at the age of 91, considered himself the luckiest man on Author the planet. And with his silk pyjamas, bunny girls and private jets, he managed to have quite an impact on the modern world. As the founder of Playboy magazine, he revolutionised the imagery of heterosexuality in popular culture, changing people’s bedroom and courtship habits in the process. Gyorgy Toth Lecturer, Post-1945 US History and He may even have influenced the path of modern American politics. Transatlantic Relations, University of Stirling Hefner launched Playboy in the early 1950s, when the norm of American popular culture was depicted by images of wholesome families in the home by the likes of illustrator Norman Rockwell. It was a period when American society was experiencing waves of moral panic over the corrupting influence of comic books on youth. But while Disney was producing The Mickey Mouse Club on television, Hefner was taking young women barely a few years older than its star Annette Funicello, and publishing pictures of them, scantily-clad, in his magazine. https://theconversation.com/how-hugh-hefners-world-helped-donald-trump-get-into-the-white-house-84853 1/4 04/10/2017 How Hugh Hefner's world helped Donald Trump get into the White House With Playboy, Hefner legitimised the kind of photographic depiction of female nudity that had previously been the remit of privately viewed postcards or pinups in men’s locker rooms.
    [Show full text]
  • Adult Entertainment and the First Amendment: a Dialogue and Analysis with the Industry's Leading Litigator
    Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law Volume 6 Issue 2 Issue 2 - Spring 2004 Article 1 2004 Adult Entertainment and the First Amendment: A Dialogue and Analysis with the Industry's Leading Litigator Clay Calvert Robert D. Richards Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/jetlaw Part of the First Amendment Commons Recommended Citation Clay Calvert and Robert D. Richards, Adult Entertainment and the First Amendment: A Dialogue and Analysis with the Industry's Leading Litigator, 6 Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law 147 (2020) Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/jetlaw/vol6/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. oaul Cambria has been called "probably the prosecution in Kansas.' 0 Today, Cambria's clients best obscenity lawyer in America" by Larry C. Flynt, include some of the leading companies in the adult the man behind the publishing empire that is Larry video market, including Vivid Video"' - Flynt's L.FP, Flynt Publications, Inc., ("LEP.") and sexually explicit Inc. recently acquired the contract for the video and magazines such as Hustler and Barely Legal.' Cambria DVD distribution arm of the Vivid Entertainment represented him when a twenty-something Flynt first Group, including its warehousing, sales and shipping faced obscenity charges in Cincinnati, Ohio,2 in the duties" - andWicked Pictures.' 3 He also is the west 1970s3 and several years later when Flynt was struck coast general counsel for the AdultVideo News,the down and left wheelchair bound by a sniper's bullets.4 leading trade industry publication.'4 Today, he serves as Flynt's general counsel.
    [Show full text]
  • A Call for Obscenity Law Reform
    William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal Volume 1 (1992) Issue 1 Article 4 May 1992 A Call for Obscenity Law Reform Scot A. Duvall Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmborj Part of the Constitutional Law Commons Repository Citation Scot A. Duvall, A Call for Obscenity Law Reform, 1 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 75 (1992), https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmborj/vol1/iss1/4 Copyright c 1992 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmborj A CALL FOR OBSCENITY LAW REFORM Scot A. Duvall* I. THE NEED FOR OBSCENITY LAW REFORM As one scholar has noted, the beauty of our Constitution is the document's capacity for growth that American society nourishes through faith in tolerance.' However, certain changes in constitutional law, including the law of obscenity, cannot occur unless the Supreme Court acts to advance the individual's interest in liberty despite the political, religious, or moral convictions of the majority.2 The need for obscenity law reform is underscored by recent cases that involve rap group "2 Live Crew" and retailers who sold the group's allegedly obscene work "As Nasty As They Wanna Be";3 Dennis Barrie and Associated with the law firm of Stites & Harbison in Louisville, Kentucky. The author is grateful to professors Jim Lennertz at Lafayette College for his insight that "there are no perfect answers, but some answers are better than others"; George Panichas at Lafayette College for teaching the Senior Colloquium that was the inspiration for this article; Brian Murchison at the Washington and Lee School of Law, for his encouragement and thoughtful criticism; and Ann Massie at the Washington and Lee School of Law, for suggesting that this Journal would be an ideal forum.
    [Show full text]
  • Larry Flynt As a Controversial Advocate for Freedom of Speech in the People Vs
    Pobrane z czasopisma New Horizons in English Studies http://newhorizons.umcs.pl Data: 04/10/2021 19:34:56 New Horizons in English Studies 1/2016 CULTURE • Natalia Dziewięcka Maria Curie-SkłodowSka univerSity (uMCS) in LubLin [email protected] Larry Flynt as a Controversial Advocate for Freedom of Speech in The People vs. Larry Flynt 1 Abstract. The focus of this article is to examine the notion of freedom, and more precisely freedom of speech, in the light of The People vs. Larry Flynt. The analysis will pay close attention to what has always been a central concern of American society constituting one of the basic principles on which the new nation was founded. What is more, the article will try to indicate that freedom of speech has been as essential as controversial in many respects, which is proven by numerous examples from American history. As a baseline of this study I have chosen Larry Flynt, whose life and legal battles form the cen- tral theme of the selected biopic. The article will scrutinizeUMCS the plot of the movie, as it provides interesting insights into the life of this controversial advocate of freedom of speech. Flynt made himself well-known, if not notorious, by being the focal point of countless debates that concerned moral issues, public taste, and two basic rights guaranteed by the Declaration of Independence and the First Amendment. Ultimately, the article will try to challenge the concept of a society based on the notion of freedom of speech by asking and trying to answer three questions: What precisely is freedom of speech? Is freedom of speech absolute? Are there any limits of expression and if so, then where to draw the line? Keywords: freedom of speech, Larry Flynt, Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights, freedom of expression, boundaries of freedom 1 A shortened version of a thesis written under the supervision of Dr.
    [Show full text]