DOCSLIB.ORG

LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 30

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 30 LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 30 November 1994 ______ Mr Speaker (The Hon. Kevin Richard Rozzoli) took the chair at 9.00 a.m. Mr Speaker offered the Prayer. CHILDREN (PARENTAL RESPONSIBILITY) BILL SUMMARY OFFENCES AND OTHER LEGISLATION (GRAFFITI) AMENDMENT BILL Second Reading Debate resumed from 24 November. Mr AMERY (Mount Druitt) [9.01]: I lead for the Opposition. The Opposition supports the general thrust of the Children (Parental Responsibility) Bill and cognate bill, but will move a number of amendments to both bills in Committee. A number of Opposition members want to address several aspects of the bills and amendments to be proposed to them in Committee, so I anticipate lengthy debate on the proposals. The weekend newspapers have picked up what has been a contentious issue within Government ranks. Summary offences, parental responsibility and youth policy are always contentious issues within the Labor Party, and promote healthy debate. That is probably more than has occurred within the coalition parties. If the weekend newspapers are to be believed, there has been virtually no debate whatsoever of those issues by the coalition. Last Thursday, in the closing hours of the sitting week the Premier gave his second reading speech, much to the surprise of members of the Opposition and of the Government - not only Government backbenchers but many Cabinet Ministers. It is obvious that in the lead-up to the next election this proposal is seen as some sort of winner for the Premier and his Government. The electorate has woken up to the fact that, contrary to what the Premier said in his second reading speech, after seven years in office the Government has failed to address the issues of youth policy, law and order, and crime on our streets, particularly the involvement of young people in street crime. That has been highlighted in both the Parramatta and Cabramatta by-elections, but particularly in Cabramatta, where street crime was a major issue, second only to health. These bills will address a number of issues which I and the Opposition support. The Children (Parental Responsibility) Bill - the primary bill - is designed to enable courts to require parents to be present during criminal proceedings against children. Having been a member of the police force for many years, I am aware that many of the provisions summarised in paragraphs (a), (b) and (c) of the explanatory note to the primary bill only formalise common practices of the courts and of police officers. The first object of the bill is: (a) to enable courts to require parents to be present during criminal proceedings against children; Many people from the legal fraternity would be aware that, wherever possible, parents are requested to attend court where persons under the age of 18 are charged with an offence. However, there are occasions when parents will not attend court, perhaps because of shame or lack of responsibility. It is hoped that, by writing into the law a requirement that parents be present during criminal proceedings involving children, the bill will address circumstances where parents feel it is not their responsibility to be involved in legal proceedings involving their children, or would let their child go it alone. The second object of the bill is: (b) to enable courts to require children to give undertakings as to future behaviour (including parental supervision) and to require parents to be present at court in the event of a breach of such an undertaking; In some ways this provision only codifies or writes into legislation what is already common practice, particularly the first part of the provision enabling courts to require children to give undertakings. Undertakings by children in Children's Courts, as well as by adults in general courts, are normal practice, particularly in regard to suspended sentences and bail matters, and are an alternative to custodial and other serious penalties. The requirement for parents to be present at court in the event of a breach of an undertaking may be a bit hard for some parents to swallow. However, if parents are to be made responsible for their children's crimes, the provision placing an onus on parents to appear in court regarding an alleged breach of an undertaking should be given a fair trial. The fair trial period will be the subject of an amendment to be moved at the Committee stage. The Opposition will seek that the bills be reviewed after 12 months. The third object of the bill is: (c) to enable courts to require parents to give undertakings concerning the future behaviour of children and other matters; This matter has previously been dealt with in courts. Where offenders of 16 or 17 years of age give undertakings to a court, this bill will require the parents to give an undertaking that they will do everything in their power to ensure that the undertakings are upheld and that the behaviour of the child improves, which is the desire of the courts when dealing with an offender in a non-custodial way. The fourth object is: (d) to enable courts to require family counselling when a child is found guilty of an offence; That is a common practice in Children's Courts. Whilst many social workers are opposed to many, if not all, the provisions in the bill, it is fair to say that those involved with social work have done a great job Page 5971 in family counselling and child welfare. This bill expands their role and provides legislative backing for the role they play. The family counselling option may be restricted by the fact that courts will be given stronger powers under the legislation to require a family or a child to undergo this form of counselling. The fifth object of the bill is controversial. It is: (e) to make it an offence for a parent, by wilful default or by neglect to exercise proper care and guardianship, to contribute to the commission of an offence by a child; This will be a pig's breakfast for the lawyers. It sets a principle or guideline which tells parents that they have a responsibility to care for their children, particularly in the wake of a court case where undertakings have been made. Parents who, by wilful neglect, contribute to the commission of an offence, could be prosecuted. In many cases this will be hard to prove. How does one prove that a parent has been neglectful, for example, where the child involved is known to be uncontrollable? There is a grey area between the issue of parents having the ability to control an uncontrollable child and parents who, by their neglect or actions or inactions, contribute to the commission of an offence. While this provision could be held out as a big stick on some occasions, I would be surprised if it results in a high incidence of convictions. Another object of the main bill is: (f) to provide for the safe escort of children from public places to their homes or certain other places, where police officers consider this action may reduce the likelihood of crime or the exposure of children to risk. This has been an issue of contention not only within social worker groups but also within the Labor Party. Some people are concerned about giving police the power to determine the age of young persons, whether they are about to commit an offence, and detaining them in custody without laying a charge against them for an offence but merely on suspicion. I have more trust in the system than some detractors from this provision outlined in that part of the explanatory note. I recall the provisions of legislation - repealed during the Wran-Unsworth years - enabling police to pick up a child they believed was exposed to moral danger. As a former police officer working in the Parramatta area I had to deal with a case where a girl of about 13 years of age was in the company of a group of about six or seven male youths, obviously between the ages of 16 and 19, during the early hours of the morning. Under the provisions of legislation dealing with exposure to moral danger, police had power vested in them - and it was common practice - to take such a child into custody, deeming that person to be exposed to moral danger or in some form of danger. In those days the young person was taken to a police station, there being no other refuges or safe places to take a child found in those circumstances. The normal practice was to telephone the parents. In certain circumstances, the child could be charged with being exposed to moral danger. In most cases it was a matter of contacting the parents and having the child returned to the home. In the case I instanced, the parents were not aware that the child was out of the home; the child had skipped out the back window after the family had gone to sleep. It is not always the case that young people are on the streets because of parental neglect. I have received letters from the New South Wales Council for Civil Liberties. The council considers this legislation to be somewhat radical. In the past the law provided the option of removing a child from a public place and taking it home or to another place if it was felt there was a likelihood of an offence being committed or of the young person being exposed to moral danger. This provision is not altogether new. Some of the provisions outlined in paragraph (f) of the explanatory note are new and were not contained in the legislation to which I referred.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Legislative Assembly
    776 LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Wednesday 7 June 2006 ______ Mr Speaker (The Hon. John Joseph Aquilina) took the chair at 10.00 a.m. Mr Speaker offered the Prayer. Mr SPEAKER: I acknowledge the Gadigal clan of the Eora nation and their elders and thank them for the custodianship of this land. JOINT SELECT COMMITTEE ON THE CROSS CITY TUNNEL Establishment and Membership Mr SPEAKER: I report the receipt of the following message from the Legislative Council: Mr SPEAKER The Legislative Council desires to inform the Legislative Assembly that, having considered the Legislative Assembly's message of 25 May 2006 regarding the Joint Select Committee on the Cross City Tunnel, it has this day agreed to the time and place appointed by the Legislative Assembly for the first meeting of the Joint Select Committee on the Cross City Tunnel. The Legislative Council further informs the Legislative Assembly that the following members of the Legislative Council have been appointed to serve as members of the committee: Ms Fazio Mr Pearce Ms Rhiannon Legislative Council MEREDITH BURGMANN 6 June 2006 President JOINT SELECT COMMITTEE ON TOBACCO SMOKING Establishment and Membership Mr SPEAKER: I report the receipt of the following message from the Legislative Council: Mr SPEAKER The Legislative Council desires to inform the Legislative Assembly that, having considered the Legislative Assembly's message of 25 May 2006 regarding the Joint Select Committee on Tobacco Smoking, it has this day agreed to the time and place appointed by the Legislative Assembly for the first meeting of the Joint Select Committee on Tobacco Smoking. The Legislative Council further informs the Legislative Assembly that the following members of the Legislative Council have been appointed to serve as members of the committee: Mr Donnelly Mr Harwin Legislative Council MEREDITH BURGMANN 6 June 2006 President CHILDREN (DETENTION CENTRES) AMENDMENT BILL Message received from the Legislative Council returning the bill without amendment.
    [Show full text]
  • Jack Morrison Harry Brown Tom Carey Fred Chaplin
    JACK MORRISON HARRY BROWN TOM CAREY FRED CHAPLIN BASIL CRAWFORD VINCE DWYER SID ELLIOTT JACK HARTWELL SNR BOB LINDFIELD GEORGE MAIN JACK McCONNELL FRANK SPONBERG ALAN WELLINGTON HARRY COURTNEY BILL JOASS EDDIE BURNS JACK HOBSON MALCOLM McPHILLIPS CLYDE CANT JACK COLEMAN GEORGE HALL TED BURDON CHARLES CHIGNELL JOE SHARP ROY McCALLUM BARRY NEVILLE EDDIE BOWEN JACK O'SULLIVAN FRED BRIGHTEN BILL KNOWLES HARRY HALL CHARLIE MORRIS ALAN BRADY BILL HOWES TOMMY KIRK AUB MITCHELL HENRY PORTER CLINT QUINLIVAN ROY GILCHRIST JOE GARTNER GEORGE MASON BILL PORTER BILLY CONNELL ROY McCARTER JIM McCORMACK BILL SPONBERG JIM PRATT VIVIAN SAUNDERS JIM DICKENSON OSSIE SAMUELS CEC FIFIELD JACK WHITFIELD GORDON CLUNAS LLOYD ATKINS TED ANDERSON JIM CHAMPION ROY KIRKALDY EDGAR NEWHAM HARRY GRIFFIN JIM DUNCOMBE GEOFFREY ROBINSON BOB ALLISON ALAN KENT JACK BONNYMAN MERV DENTON LIN JOHNSON JACK REILLY JIM GIBBS BOB FARRAR BERNIE MARTIN BOB RUSSELL LES CLARE ARTHUR MORRIS RON BAILEY RON KNIGHT TOM LYONS BOB JACKSON GEORGE ELLEY CHARLIE SIMMATT JACK STEWART TOTOMMEM EEZAZARRTT TONYTONY NANASHS JIM HARGREAVES GEORGE DAY LEW FISHER BILL HARRIS BILL SHIPPEN STEVE ZACCARIA ALAN WOODS ELWYN RYAN JOHN BENSON WILLIAM ISLES RUSSELL KELLY CHARLIE JUPP RAY POWER TOM SMALL BILLBILLLL ANSLOWANSLOW ERNIEEERNIE BRIGHTBRIGHT GEORGEGEORRGGE COOKCOOO JOE DONOHUE GEORGE KILHAM JOHNNY PAYNE ALAN WATSFORD JOE WILSON JOHN ANDERSON LENNIE WILLAN NORM YOUNG JIM COLLINS LEN BENNETT GEORGE ENDYCOTT ROSS HENDERSONRSON ROOYY MITCHELLMMITCCHHEELL JOHNJOHN HARDINGHARARDRDING VINCEVINCEC WHALEWHALE
    [Show full text]
  • The Ashgrovian
    THE ASHGROVIAN THE ASHGROVIAN Vol 51 - No 1 The Official Publication of Marist College Ashgrove Old Boys Association Inc. FIRST EDITION 2013 LLEGE O AS H C T G S R I O R V A E M After completing the above, please post to: Marist Old Boys Association, PO Box 82, Ashgrove QLD 4060 PAYMENT O My “not negotiable” cheque, payable to Marist College Ashgrove Old Boys Assoc. is enclosed. OR Bankcard Mastercard Visa Expiry Date / S Card Number: L Name on Card: _______________________________________________________________________________________ Y Cardholder’s Signature: ___________________________________________ Phone No: _________________________ D B O T H E A S H G R O V I A N PRESIDENT TREASURER Jim GARDINER Anthony COLLINS 1972-1980 (Kath) 1973-1978 (Joanne) P: 07 33667005; M: 0410 565 800 P: 3366 0871; W: 3229 5448 M: 0417 336 977 E: [email protected] E: [email protected] VICE-PRESIDENT SECRETARY Peter CASEY Dominick MELROSE 1966-1974 (Linda) 1985-1992 (Rebecca) M: 0438 325 863 P: 07 3851 2828; M: 0430 030 044 E: [email protected] E: [email protected] COMMITTEE Chris Shay Stuart LAING 1985-1989 (Ann-Maree) 1969-1977 (Louise) P 07 3356 5728; M 0412 228 565 P: 07 3366 5188; M 0428 709 733 E: [email protected] E: [email protected] Sean HARKIN Jack LARACY 1972-1980 (Maria) 1945-1953 (Karin) H: 07 3366 6270; M: 0401 137 048 P: 07 3300 1622 E: [email protected] E: [email protected] Mark KIERPAL John O’HARE 1981-1988 (Martine) 1964-1972 (Jane) P: 07 3352 5275; W 07 3118 0600 P: 07 3369 4860; W 07 3366 3559 M: 0400 517 745 E: [email protected] E: [email protected] DATES TO REMEMBER 2013 Friday 16 August VINTAGE BLUE & GOLD LUNCH for classes from 1940 to 1973 Friday 4 October REUNION MASS AND EVENING FUNCTION at the Cyprian Pavilion Check the Old Boys website at www.ashgroveoldboys.com.au for further details.
    [Show full text]
  • Debbie Spillane
    THE 13TH ANNUAL TOM BROCK LECTURE was delivered by Debbie Spillane. This lecture was The View entitled The View from the Ladies Stand. In the past 50 years , the place of women in rugby from the league has changed. Debbie Spillane draws on her own experiences, describing how the women in her family introduced her to rugby league. Ladies Stand She tells of her search for a gap in the male defences that blocked her path to involvement in the sport that had dominated her childhood. In a career that has included newspaper reporting, songwriting, coaching and ultimately journalism, rugby league has been a common thread. Reporting on rugby league and working for a football club have given Debbie a unique vantage point from which to view the collective behavior of rugby league towards women. Debbie also observes the behaviour of women in and around the sport. How have the ways in Debbie Spillane which women participate in, affect and influence rugby league have changed over the years? What lies ahead on those fronts, and for the game in general? TomPublished by the Brock Tom Brock Bequest Committee on behalf of the Australian Society for Sports History. tombrock.com.au 13th Annual Tom Brock Lecture The View from the Ladies Stand Debbie Spillane 13th Annual Tom Brock Lecture NSW Leagues Club Sydney NSW 15 September 2011 Australian Society for Sports History www.sporthistory.org The View from the Ladies Stand 13th Annual Tom Brock Lecture NSW Leagues Club, Sydney, 15 September 2011 Published in 2012 by the Tom Brock Bequest Committee on behalf of the Australian Society for Sports History.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Assembly
    1125 LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Wednesday 30 August 2006 ______ Mr Speaker (The Hon. John Joseph Aquilina) took the chair at 10.00 a.m. Mr Speaker offered the Prayer. Mr SPEAKER: I acknowledge the Gadigal clan of the Eora nation and its elders and thank them for their custodianship of this land. DEER BILL Bill introduced and read a first time. Second Reading Mr GRAHAM WEST (Campbelltown—Parliamentary Secretary) [10.02 a.m.], on behalf of Mr David Campbell: I move: That this bill be now read a second time. The Deer Bill introduces new legislation to clarify the ownership of deer, to regulate the keeping and management of captive deer, to prevent the release of deer from captivity, and to introduce mechanisms to control deer that are not captive. The difficulties in managing deer have led to significant public safety, and environmental and agricultural impacts. The bill will help manage deer to mitigate those impacts. As honourable members would know, deer are not native to Australia. However, they do have a long history in New South Wales when viewed from the perspective of European settlement. The first deer were imported into New South Wales in 1803 and have since established in the Australian bush, particularly in Victoria and New South Wales. Two hundred years later, those deer populations are flourishing and today we understand much better the perils of not managing introduced wild animals. Introduced animals are well known for the environmental damage they can cause when present in large numbers. Deer are no different, and excessive deer populations could destroy native vegetation and damage sensitive areas in our fragile Australian landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir Peter Leitch Club at MT SMART STADIUM, HOME of the MIGHTY VODAFONE WARRIORS
    Sir Peter Leitch Club AT MT SMART STADIUM, HOME OF THE MIGHTY VODAFONE WARRIORS 3rd August 2018 Newsletter #228b Hall of Fame By Barry Ross HE NRL deserve congratulations for their Hall of Fame function on Wednesday night. Over 300 peo- Tple attended the black tie event at the Sydney Cricket Ground where five new players were inducted as Immortals and six others were admitted to the Hall of Fame. Three of the new Immortals came from the pre Second World War era and this was very pleasing to most League fans. Each of these three men gave plenty to the game and deserve the honour. History tells us that centre, DALLY MESSENGER played a major and vital role in Rugby League becoming the success it is today. Born in Sydney on 12 April 1883, Dally died at Gunnedah, 440 kms north of Sydney, on 24 November 1959, aged 76. He had played two Rugby Union Tests for Australia against the All Blacks in August 1907, before signing to play Rugby League a few days later and then touring England with the New Zealand All Golds. When he returned to Australia, he joined the Eastern Suburbs club for the very first Sydney Rugby League season in 1908. He won three successive Premierships with Easts in 1911-1913 and altogether played 48 Premiership games with the club in his six seasons, scoring 381 points. He toured England with the first Kangaroos of 1908/09 and when he retired at the end of 1913, he had played seven Tests for Australia, three as captain, as well as 28 minor tour matches.
    [Show full text]
  • Scanlen's Football Gum Bob Heffernan
    A SERIES OF 33 No. 14 A SERIES OF 33 No. 24 A SERIES OF 33 No. 16 SCANLEN'S FOOTBALL GUM SCANLEN'S FOOTBALL GUM MICHAEL CLEARY SCANLEN'S FOOTBALL GUM A magnificent all-round athlete PETER PROVAN BOB HEFFERNAN who can run as fast as any Of the fine players who have Although lacking in weight and the Australian has ever done. Cleary unluckily missed intefnat>°"«' giant physique so handy for a was a brilliant Rugby Union selection in postwar Rugby successful forward, determined, winger who toured South Africa League, Peter Provan has resourceful Bob Heffernan has with the Wallabies in 1961. In probably been the most unfortu• given Eastern Suburbs great 1962 he switched to Rugby League nate of all. He missed selection in iervice. Heffernan plays mainly and within a few matches proved the 1956 Australian team when, in the second-row but has filled himself a match-winner. He at the age of 19, he was rated every position in the pack, except played League as an amateur for Sydney's most spectacular for• hooker, when Easts were in two seasons but on selection for ward Peter Provan is faster than trouble because of injuries. Bob the 1963 Kangaroo team for his brother Norm, backs up is a speedy mover who often England he relinquished his superbly and is a masterly cover makes openings by being at the amateur status. On tour he was defender. Johnny Raper has right spot at the right time. He a spectacular success playing stood in his way whenever repre• is a familiar figure in East s pack alongside centres who used his sentative teams have been picked because of his headguard.
    [Show full text]