Job Satisfaction and Retention of Middle School Teachers

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Job Satisfaction and Retention of Middle School Teachers Walden University ScholarWorks Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection 2020 Job Satisfaction and Retention of Middle School Teachers Rebecca Jane Gault Walden University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations Part of the Educational Administration and Supervision Commons This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection at ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Walden University College of Education This is to certify that the doctoral study by Rebecca Gault has been found to be complete and satisfactory in all respects, and that any and all revisions required by the review committee have been made. Review Committee Dr. Jerry Collins, Committee Chairperson, Education Faculty Dr. Andrew Alexson, Committee Member, Education Faculty Dr. Ionut-Dorin Stanciu, University Reviewer, Education Faculty Chief Academic Officer and Provost Sue Subocz, Ph.D. Walden University 2020 Abstract Job Satisfaction and Retention of Middle School Teachers by Rebecca Gault MA, Towson University, 1991 MS, Towson University, 1997 BS, Towson University, 1990 Project Study Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Education Walden University May 2020 Abstract The problem investigated in this study was the high turnover rates of experienced, quality, and highly effective middle school teachers, which has a negative effect on student learning and achievement. The purpose of this qualitative study was to discover what specific support and professional development middle school teachers need to remain teaching. The conceptual framework that grounded this study was Herzberg’s two-factor theory of motivation. The research questions explored what experienced middle school teachers need in terms of support and professional development in order to improve their job satisfaction and increase their retention. Nine teachers, one from each middle school in the district, were interviewed by phone or through a face-to-face format. After first-round initial coding and second-round pattern coding, it was determined that teachers need (a) to be valued by their administrators, (b) supported by their colleagues, (c) professional development with meaningful content, (d) professional development that honors their experience, and (e) professional development that is collaborative. This study promotes positive social change by offering specific ways to support and provide useful professional development to middle school teachers, which in turn will increase job satisfaction and foster their retention. Such retention will increase student achievement, improve the overall school environment, and create stability in the surrounding community. Job Satisfaction and Retention of Middle School Teachers by Rebecca Gault MA, Towson University, 1991 MS, Towson University, 1997 BS, Towson University, 1990 Project Study Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Education Walden University May 2020 Dedication I dedicate this research to my children, Sarah, Anna, and Joshua Rozmiarek. They were so patient and encouraging as I went through the process to complete my study. It is my further hope that their children may have quality, highly effective, experienced teachers. Acknowledgments I am deeply grateful for the support of my chair, Dr. Jerry Collins, and my second chair, Dr. Andrew Alexson as I engaged in this process. It is only with their wisdom, feedback, and encouragement that I was able to complete my study. I also acknowledge the support of my husband, James G. Gault, Esquire, for being a constant source of comfort and companionship throughout this process. Table of Contents Section 1: The Problem ........................................................................................................1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................1 Rationale ........................................................................................................................4 Definition of Terms........................................................................................................6 Significance of the Study ...............................................................................................8 Research Questions ........................................................................................................9 Review of the Literature ..............................................................................................10 Conceptual Framework ................................................................................................10 Implications..................................................................................................................32 Summary ......................................................................................................................32 Section 2: The Methodology ..............................................................................................34 Research Design and Approach ...................................................................................34 The Participants ...........................................................................................................36 Participant Access and Protection ................................................................................37 Data Collection ............................................................................................................38 Data Analysis ...............................................................................................................46 Data Analysis Results ..................................................................................................51 Connection to the Problem, Research Questions, and Conceptual Framework ..........66 Section 3: The Project ........................................................................................................71 Introduction ..................................................................................................................71 Rationale ......................................................................................................................72 Review of the Literature ..............................................................................................72 i Project Description.......................................................................................................84 Project Evaluation Plan ................................................................................................93 Project Implications .....................................................................................................96 Section 4: Reflections and Conclusions .............................................................................99 Project Strengths and Limitations ................................................................................99 Recommendations for Alternative Approaches .........................................................101 Scholarship, Project Development and Evaluation, and Leadership and Change ...........................................................................................................104 Reflection on Importance of the Work ......................................................................109 Implications, Applications, and Directions for Future Research ...............................110 Conclusion .................................................................................................................111 References ........................................................................................................................112 Appendix A: The Project .................................................................................................132 Appendix B: Interview Questions ....................................................................................178 Appendix C: Interview Protocol ......................................................................................180 Appendix D: Probing Questions and Statements .............................................................181 Appendix E: Follow-Up Questions:.................................................................................182 Appendix F: Participant Validation Form........................................................................183 Appendix G: Email to Principals of Teacher Study Participants .....................................184 Appendix H: Email Invitation for Participants ................................................................186 ii List of Tables Table 1: CSD Teacher Years of Experience and Attrition Profile in 2018–2019 .............. 3 Table 2: CSD Teacher Attrition and Evaluation Profile in 2018–2019 .............................. 4 Table 3: Demographics of Teacher Participants ............................................................... 53 Table 4: Teacher Participants and Initial Codes for RQ1 and RQ2 .................................. 54 Table 5: Theme 1: Teachers need to be valued by their administrators ........................... 56 Table 6: Theme 2: Teachers need the support of their
Recommended publications
  • Minority Teacher Recruitment, Development, and Retention
    Minority Teacher Recruitment, Development, and Retention THE EDUCATION ALLIANCE at Brown University Minority Teacher Recruitment, Development, and Retention THE EDUCATION ALLIANCE at Brown University THE EDUCATION ALLIANCE at Brown University Northeast and Islands Regional Educational Laboratory (LAB) The Education Alliance at Brown University is home to the Northeast and Islands Regional Educational Laboratory (LAB), one of ten educational laboratories funded by the U.S. Department of Education’s Institute of Education Sciences. Our goals are to improve teaching and learning, advance school improvement, build capacity for reform, and develop strategic alliances with key members of the region’s education and policymaking community. The LAB develops educational products and services for school administrators, policymakers, teachers, and parents in New England, New York, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands. Central to our efforts is a commitment to equity and excellence. Information about all Alliance programs and services is available by contacting: The Education Alliance Phone: 800.521.9550 at Brown University Fax: 401.421.7650 222 Richmond Street, Suite 300 E-mail: [email protected] Providence, RI 02903-4226 Web: www.alliance.brown.edu Authors: Designer: Judith Torres, Janet Santos, Sherri King-Rodrigues Nancy L. Peck, Lydia Cortes Editors: Photo Credits: Kristin Latina, Jessica Swedlow Cover Photographs by David H. Wells, Narrative Photography, Providence, RI; John Abramowski, Providence, RI; and Bridgit Besaw Gorman, New York, NY To download this document electronically, or to check for updated versions, visit http://www.alliance.brown.edu/tdl/minteachrcrt.shtml at The Education Alliance’s Teaching Diverse Learners Web site (http://www. alliance.brown.edu/tdl/).
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship Between Teacher Collaboration and Student Achievement
    The University of Southern Mississippi The Aquila Digital Community Dissertations Fall 12-2011 The Relationship Between Teacher Collaboration and Student Achievement Sandra Reid Ervin University of Southern Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/dissertations Part of the Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research Commons, and the Elementary and Middle and Secondary Education Administration Commons Recommended Citation Ervin, Sandra Reid, "The Relationship Between Teacher Collaboration and Student Achievement" (2011). Dissertations. 731. https://aquila.usm.edu/dissertations/731 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The University of Southern Mississippi THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TEACHER COLLABORATION AND STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT by Sandra Reid Ervin Abstract of a Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School of The University of Southern Mississippi in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2011 ABSTRACT THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TEACHER COLLABORATION AND STUDENT ACHEVEMENT by Sandra Reid Ervin December 2011 NCLB mandates have placed a strong sense of responsibility on educators to ensure that all students are performing at their optimal academic levels. The collaboration of educators is needed as the accountability for student performances increases. At the school level, collaboration and a focus on instruction influence productivity, morale, teacher retention and ultimately, student achievement. The role of the administrators is to provide a collaborative culture where teachers are empowered to analyze and work together to solve problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Keeping Quality Teachers the Art of Retaining General and Special Education Teachers
    Keeping Quality Teachers The Art of Retaining General and Special Education Teachers A Practical Guidebook for School Leaders Held Accountable for Student Success THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Regents of The University ROBERT M. BENNETT, Chancellor, B.A., M.S. .............................................. Tonawanda ADELAIDE L. SANFORD, Vice Chancellor, B.A., M.A., P.D. ........................ Hollis DIANE O’NEILL MCGIVERN,B.S.N., M.A., Ph.D. ...................................... Staten Island SAUL B. COHEN, B.A., M.A., Ph.D. ............................................................ New Rochelle JAMES C. DAWSON, A.A., B.A., M.S., Ph.D. ............................................... Peru ANTHONY S. BOTTAR, B.A., J.D. .................................................................. North Syracuse MERRYL H. TISCH, B.A., M.A. ..................................................................... New York GERALDINE D. CHAPEY, B.A., M.A., Ed.D. ................................................ Belle Harbor ARNOLD B. GARDNER, B.A., LL.B. .............................................................. Buffalo HARRY PHILLIPS, 3rd, B.A., M.S.F.S. ........................................................... Hartsdale JOSEPH E. BOWMAN, JR., B.A., M.L.S., M.A., M.Ed., Ed.D. ..................... Albany LORRAINE A. CORTÉS-VÁZQUEZ,B.A., M.P.A. ........................................... Bronx JAMES R. TALLON, JR., B.A., M.A. ............................................................... Binghamton MILTON L. COFIELD, B.S., M.B.A., Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Education Reparation: an Examination of Black Teacher Retention
    EDUCATION REPARATION: AN EXAMINATION OF BLACK TEACHER RETENTION Malika Melesse Hollinside B.A., California State University, Sacramento, 2004 M.A., California State University, Sacramento, 2013 DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF EDUCATION in EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP at CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, SACRAMENTO SPRING 2017 Copyright © 2017 Malika Melesse Hollinside All rights reserved ii EDUCATION REPARATION: AN EXAMINATION OF BLACK TEACHER RETENTION A Dissertation by Malika Melesse Hollinside Approved by Dissertation Committee: _______________________________ Dr. Lisa Romero, PhD. _______________________________ Dr. Lisa William, PhD. _______________________________ Dr. Frank Lilly, PhD. SPRING 2017 iii EDUCATION REPARATION: AN EXAMINATION OF BLACK TEACHER RETENTION Student: Malika Melesse Hollinside I certify that this student has met the requirements for format contained in the University format manual, and that this dissertation is suitable for shelving in the library and credit is to be awarded for the dissertation. ___________________________, Graduate Coordinator _________________ Dr. Lisa Romero, Ph.D. Date iv LIVICATION To Jaiden Williams: Miracles happen. We will pray for yours until it comes. All praise unto the Most High for giving me the strength, wisdom, and perseverance to accomplish this endeavor. I give eternal thanks for the countless blessings and pray that others may be so fortunate. With every cell in my being I will never cease the fight for the liberation, justice, and evolution of humanity. To my Ancestors: All honor, respect, and gratitude. My struggles pale in comparison to your tribulations; I pray my efforts are worthy of your legacy. To my Granny Lydia and Grandma Frances: You are thought of everyday.
    [Show full text]