Arxiv:2007.02356V2 [Hep-Th] 17 Feb 2021 Insulator Transition [11] and the Appearance of the Superinsu- Lating State [12–14]
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Quantum magnetic monopole condensate M. C. Diamantini,1 C. A. Trugenberger,2 and V.M. Vinokur3 1NiPS Laboratory, INFN and Dipartimento di Fisica e Geologia, University of Perugia, via A. Pascoli, I-06100 Perugia, Italy 2SwissScientific Technologies SA, rue du Rhone 59, CH-1204 Geneva, Switzerland 3Terra Quantum AG, St. Gallerstrasse 16A, CH-9400 Rorschach, Switzerland Despite decades-long efforts, magnetic monopoles were never found as elementary particles. Monopoles and associated currents were directly measured in experiments and identified as topological quasiparticle excitations in emergent condensed matter systems. These monopoles and the related electric-magnetic symmetry were restricted to classical electrodynamics, with monopoles behaving as classical particles. Here we show that the electric-magnetic symmetry is most fundamental and extends to full quantum behavior. We demonstrate that at low temperatures magnetic monopoles can form a quantum Bose condensate dual to the charge Cooper pair condensate in superconductors. The monopole Bose condensate manifests as a superinsulating state with infinite resistance, dual to superconductivity. Monopole supercurrents result in the electric analog of the Meissner effect and lead to linear confinement of Cooper pairs by Polyakov electric strings in analogy to quarks in hadrons. INTRODUCTION a b + – – – + + – – + + Maxwell’s equations in vacuum are symmetric under the dual- + – – + – – + – – ity transformation E ! B and B ! −E (we use natural units + c = 1, ~ = 1, " = 0). Duality is preserved, provided that both + + 0 – + – – – + electric and magnetic sources (magnetic monopoles and mag- – – + + + – netic currents) are included [1]. Magnetic monopoles, while + – + + – + elusive as elementary particles [2], exist in many materials in – + + the form of emergent quasiparticle excitations [3]. Magnetic – monopoles and associated currents were directly measured in experiments [4], confirming the predicted symmetry between electricity and magnetism. The existence of monopoles re- FIG. 1. Magnetic monopole states at low temperatures. a: quires that gauge fields are compact, implying, in turn, the Monopoles are confined into dipoles state by tension of vortices con- quantization of charge and Dirac strings [5] or a core with ad- necting them. b: As the vortex tension vanishes, the monopoles at ditional degrees of freedom to regularize the singularities of their endpoints become loose free particles that can condense. the vector potential [6,7]. The importance of electric-magnetic duality was first re- alized by Nambu [8], Mandelstam [9] and ’t Hooft [10], who analog of the Meissner effect and lead to linear confinement proposed that colour confinement in quantum chromodynam- of the Cooper pairs by Polyakov’s electric strings [14, 17, 18] ics (QCD) can be understood as a dual Meissner effect. In (dual to superconducting vortices) in analogy to quarks within the present context, electric-magnetic duality manifestly real- hadrons [19]. The monopole condensate realizes a 3D ver- izes the symmetry between Cooper pairs, which are Noether sion of superinsulators, that have been previously observed in charges, and magnetic monopoles, which are topological 2D superconducting films, and result from quantum tunneling solitons, and forms the foundation for the superconductor- events, or instantons [12–14, 17, 18]. arXiv:2007.02356v2 [hep-th] 17 Feb 2021 insulator transition [11] and the appearance of the superinsu- lating state [12–14]. Magnetic monopoles arise also as instan- tons in Josephson junction arrays (JJA) [15], which are easily RESULTS accessible experimental systems themselves and provide an exemplary model for superconducting films [16]. Magnetic monopoles in granular superconductors So far, monopoles in emergent condensed matter systems were treated as classical excitations. Here we show that the electric-magnetic symmetry is most fundamental and ex- To gain insight into the nature of a system that can harbor tends to the full quantum realm. We demonstrate here that Cooper pairs and magnetic monopoles simultaneously, we at low temperatures, magnetic monopoles form a quantum first reiterate that monopoles naturally emerge in 2D JJA [15] Bose condensate dual to the charge condensate in supercon- as instantons and provide the underlying mechanism of 2D su- ductors and generate a superinsulating state with infinite re- perinsulation as quantum tunneling events. To establish that sistance, dual to superconductivity [12, 13]. We show that JJA indeed offers a universal model describing superinsulation magnetic monopole supercurrents result in the direct electric in films, one recalls the early hypothesis that, in the vicin- 2 ity of the superconductor-insulator transition (SIT), the films Long-distance effective field theory acquire self-induced electronic granular texture and can be viewed as a set of superconducting granules immersed into an insulating matrix [20]. Employing the model of the 2D Having established that in the vicinity of the SIT an ensem- JJA [21] to treat the experimental data of [17, 22], perfectly ble of Cooper pairs acquires a granular structure, we con- confirmed this picture, and settled that granules have the typ- struct a Ginzburg-Landau-type effective field theory of such ical size of order of the superconducting coherence length, ξ, granular Cooper pair condensates. We focus on the London and are coupled by Josephson links. On the theory side, this limit, i.e. on long distances, much larger than the topological granular structure was derived in the framework of the gauge width scale so that vortices and monopoles appear as point- theory of the SIT in [23], conclusively establishing the JJA- like singularities. As a first step, following general princi- like texture in 2D systems experiencing the SIT. ples by Wilczek [25], we identify that the dominant interac- tions are the topological mutual statistics interaction setting As a next step, we generalize the reasoning of [23] onto 3D the Aharonov-Bohm phases between charges and vortices. A systems. This enables us to adopt the original gauge theory of standard description of the interaction part of the system’s JJA [12] for 3D superconductors and consider a general inho- Lagrangian is achieved by introducing two fictitious gauge mogeneous system of superconducting granules, i.e. bubbles fields, a vector field aµ and an antisymmetric pseudotensor of Cooper pair condensate, coupled by tunneling links. Then, gauge field bµν [26]: depending on the ratio of the strength of Josephson coupling 1 µναβ µ 1 µν and the Coulomb energy of the elemental excessive charge on LBI = bµν @αaβ + aµq + bµνm : (1) a single granule, the system can be either an insulator, super- 4π 2 conductor, or topological insulator [12, 23]. If the system is where qµ and mµν are the charge and vortex currents, respec- at the insulating side of the SIT, the global phase coherence tively. This so-called BF model [26] is topological, since it is absent and each condensate bubble is characterized by an is metric-independent. It is invariant under the usual gauge independent phase. The relevant degrees of freedom in such transformations aµ ! aµ + @µξ and under the gauge trans- systems are single Cooper pairs that can tunnel from one is- formation of the second kind[26], under which the antisym- land to the next one, leaving behind a Cooper hole, and vor- metric tensor transforms as bµν ! bµν + @µλν − @νλµ, a tices, resulting from non-trivial phase circulations over adja- vector field λµ becoming itself the gauge function. The BF cent granules. In a 2D system such a vortex would be a usual action for a model defined on a compact space endowed Josephson vortex, and in 3D such an elemental ’minimal’ vor- with the non-trivial topology, yields a ground state with the tex is similar to a pancake vortex in a layered cuprate [24]. In degeneracy reflecting, one-to-one, this topology and is re- the usual configuration, these pancake vortices aggregate on ferred to as topological order [27]. The coefficient 1=4π top of each other to make stacks, or chains. When the pan- of the first term in Eq. (1) ensures that the system does cake stack forms, the magnetic monopoles and antimonopoles not have such a topological order [28]. In turn, the topo- at the “bottom” and “top” of each of such a pancake “annihi- logical coupling between a vector and a pseudotensor in late” and one long vortex forms. Only the monopoles and anti- 3D, ensures the parity (ZP) and time-reversal (ZT) symme- monopoles at the very end of this configuration survive and, tries of the model. The field strength associated with aµ correspondingly, one has such monopoles and anti-monopoles is fµν=@µaν − @νaµ, whereas bµν has the associated 3-tensor only at the surfaces of the sample [24]. When pancake vor- field strength hµνα=@µbνα + @νbαµ + @αbµν. It can be eas- tices are ballistic and the layers are only weakly coupled, how- ily checked that this expression is invariant under the gauge ever, the vertical stacks can break in the middle, resulting in transformations of the second kind; it plays for bµν the same monopole and anti-monopole pairs joined by a shorter vor- role that the field strength fµν plays for the usual gauge field µ µ µναβ tex in the interior of the sample. As always, when there are aµ. The dual field strengths j =(1=2π)h =(1=4π) @νbαβ µν µν µναβ both dynamic charges and vortices in the spectrum, the latter and m = (1=2π) f˜ = (1=4π) fµν represent the con- acquires a topological gap [25]. The inverse of the gap sets served charge