DOCSLIB.ORG

Laplacian Spectra and Spanning Trees of Threshold Graphs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Laplacian Spectra and Spanning Trees of Threshold Graphs View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector DISCRETE APPLIED MATHEMATICS ELSEVIEK Discrete Applied Mathematics 65 (1996) 2555273 Laplacian spectra and spanning trees of threshold graphs P.L. Hammer*, A.K. Kelmans RUTCOR, Rutgers Uniwrsit). NW Bruns~t~clr. NJ OXY03, L’S.4 Received 12 May 1993; revised 4 March 1994 Abstract In this paper we study the Laplacian spectra, the Laplacian polynomials, and the number of spanning trees of a special class of graphs called threshold graphs. We.give formulas for the Laplacian spectrum, the Laplacian polynomial, and the number of spanning trees of a threshold graph, in terms of so-called composition sequences of threshold graphs. It is shown that the degree sequence of a threshold graph and the sequence of eigenvalues of its Laplacian matrix are “almost the same”. On this basis, formulas are given to express the Laplacian polynomial and the number of spanning trees of a threshold graph in terms of its degree sequcncc. Moreover, threshold graphs are shown to be uniquely defined by their spectrum. and a poly- nomial time procedure is given for testing whether a given sequence of numbers is the spectrum of a threshold graph. 1. Introduction and notations The Laplacian matrix (or the matrix of admittance) of a graph is one of the classical concepts in graph theory [l, 2,5,20]. One of the most interesting and useful results about this matrix is the well-known matrix-tree theorem. which states that if 17is the order of the matrix, then the number of spanning trees of the graph is equal to the determinant of any principal minor of order n - 1. It turns out that the Laplacian polynomial of the graph, i.e. the characteristic polynomial of the Laplacian matrix of the graph (introduced in [24,25], see also [lo]), is also a very useful concept, which has a natural combinatorial interpretation. It has been shown in [30] that the inclusion-exclusion formula of [33] for the number of spanning trees of a graph can be directly “read” from this polynomial. This polynomial is also useful in evaluating the probability of connectivity of graphs. in constructing graphs having a maximum number of spanning trees. and for *Corresponding author. 0166-218X/96:$15.00 ~(‘11996-Elsevier Science W.V. All rights reserved SSDI 01 66-21 8X(94)00049-2 256 P.L. Hammer, A.K. Kelmans J Discrete Applied Mathematics 65 (1996) 255-273 various other problems in extremal graph theory [12,24426,28&30], as well as in statistical experiments (see, for example, [7]); among the papers dealing with this topic we mention [3,9,11,13,14,16,18,21~23,34437]. For the special case of regular graphs, there is a straightforward relationship between the Laplacian polynomial and the characteristic polynomial of the adjacency matrix of a graph, allowing to translate directly results concerning one of those polynomials to results concerning the other one. One of the natural questions about the Laplacian polynomial concerns the extent to which it characterizes the corresponding graph. There are many examples of cospectral graphs, i.e. non-isomorphic graphs with the same Laplacian polynomial (e.g. [12,23,24,26,28,29,34], see also [lo]). On the other hand certain classes of graphs are uniquely defined by their spectrum. Such classes include complete graphs, regular k-partite graphs, paths, circuits, trees up to 10 vertices, stars and some other special trees (e.g. [12,24,26,28-301). It is also known that in the class of regular graphs the line graphs of some combinatorial structures (complete graphs, complete bipartite graphs, block designs, projective planes, finite affine planes, etc.) are uniquely defined under certain conditions by their Laplacian polynomials among the regular graphs (e.g. [13,14,21-23,351). In this paper we study the Laplacian spectra, the Laplacian polynomials, and the number of spanning trees of a special class of graphs called threshold graphs. Thre- shold graphs were introduced in [6], and numerous properties of them were investig- ated in the literature; surveys on this topic appear in Ch. 10 of [17], in [4], and in the forthcoming monograph [32]. It is easy to see that a canonical description of a threshold graph having y1vertices can be given by a sequence of at most y1integer parameters, called its composition sequence. We give formulas for the Laplacian spectrum, the Laplacian polynomial, and the number of spanning trees of a threshold graph, in terms of its composition sequence (Theorems 4.2,4.3, and 5.4). It is shown (Theorem 5.3) that the degree sequence of a threshold graph and the sequence of eigenvalues of its Laplacian matrix are “almost the same”. On this basis, formulas are given for the Laplacian polynomial and the number of spanning trees of a threshold graph, in terms of its degree sequence (Theorem 5.4). Moreover, threshold graphs are shown to be uniquely defined by their spectrum (Theorem 6.1), and a polynomial time procedure is given for testing whether a given sequence of numbers is the spectrum of a threshold graph. All the graphs considered in this paper are undirected and have no loops or multiple edges [l, 2,201. Let V(G) and E(G) denote the set of vertices and edges of G, respectively. Let U(G) denote the number of vertices of G. 2. Decomposable graphs Given two disjoint graphs A and B, a graph G is called the sum of A and B, G = A + B, if I’(G) = V(A)uV(B) and E(G) = E(A)uE(B). Similarly, the product P.I.. Hummer. A.K. K&mans ; Discre!e Applied Muthemaiic~s 6.5 llW6) 255-273 -.157 A x B will denote the graph obtained from A + B by adding all the edges (u,h) with 0 E V(.4) and h E V(B). In particular, if B consists of a single vertex h, we write 4 + h and A x h instead of A + B and A x B: in these cases h is called an i.sol~~terland a unicwsal rertc.x, respectively. Given a graph G, let i(G) and u(G) denote the number of isolated and universal vertices, respectively. The graph G is said to be the complenrenr c?f’a grrrph G if there is a bijection ~(0:V(G) + V(G) such that (u, U) is an edge of G if and only if ((p(u), (P(U)) is not an edge of G. Let K,, be the complete graph on II vertices. and let its complement k’,, be the c’rnptl’ graph on 12vertices. If I/(K,) = I/(K,J = [g,, . ,gn) then K,, = cl1 xy? x ... xc]!,, and K,, = 8, + c/l + ... + 11,~;we shall write simply K, = .1/”and K, = MCI. A graph is called decomposable [25] if any induced subgraph having at least two v,ertices is the sum or the product of two graphs. It is easy to see that a graph is decomposable if and only if it can be obtained from one-vertex graphs by the above operations ( + ) and ( x 1, and if and only if it does not contain a path on 3 vertices as an induced subgraph. Let I;i denote the set of decomposable graphs. Clearly every disconnected graph is the (unique) sum of its connected components. Similarly. every connected decomposable graph is the (unique) product of some disconnected or one-vertex graphs (the complements of which are the connected components of the complement of the given graph). For example, the graph H in Fig. 1 is decomposable and can be represented as H = (yl + q1)(g4(q3 + q5) + qhq7). A decomposable graph G can be naturally described 1251 by a labelled rooted tree T(G) which will be called the compo,sition trcr of G. The root I’ will be labelled having the label S(T) = { x ) if G is connected. and .~(I.)= ( +) if G is disconnected. This tree can be defined recursively as follows. If G is a one-vertex graph then let T(G) be the trivial rooted tree consisting of one vertex which is the root of T(G) and has the label ( x ). Suppose that Gi is a decomposable graph, that T (Gi) is already defined for G,, and that Ti is the root of T(GJ, i = 1, . , k. Suppose also that the label .s(ri) of the root I’, of T (Gi) is (x i if Gj is connected, and is { +) if Gi is disconnected. Let T be the tree 258 P.L. Hammer, A.K. Kelmans / Discrete Applied Mathematics 65 (1996) 255-273 obtained from disjoint rooted trees T (Gi) by adding a new vertex r, the root of T, and by connecting r with every root Yi by an edge (r,rJ. If G = G1 x ... x Gk where each Gi is not the product of two graphs (which means in our case that Gi is a one-vertex or disconnected graph) then put T(G) = T, and S(V) = { x }. If G = G, + ... + Gk where each Gi is not the sum of two graphs (i.e. Gi is a connected graph) then put T(G) = T, and S(Y) = { +}. The rooted tree T(H) of the graph H in Fig. 1 is shown in Fig. 2. It is easy to see that T(G) is uniquely defined by G, and that two decomposable graphs G and F are isomorphic if and only if T(G) and T(F) are isomorphic as rooted labelled trees.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • On the Super Domination Number of Graphs
    On the super domination number of graphs Douglas J. Klein1, Juan A. Rodr´ıguez-Vel´azquez1,2, Eunjeong Yi1 1Texas A&M University at Galveston Foundational Sciences, Galveston, TX 77553, United States 2Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Departament d’Enginyeria Inform`atica i Matem`atiques Av. Pa¨ısos Catalans 26, 43007 Tarragona, Spain Email addresses: [email protected], [email protected],[email protected] April 24, 2018 Abstract The open neighbourhood of a vertex v of a graph G is the set N(v) consisting of all vertices adjacent to v in G. For D ⊆ V (G), we define D = V (G) \ D. A set D ⊆ V (G) is called a super dominating set of G if for every vertex u ∈ D, there exists v ∈ D such that N(v) ∩ D = {u}. The super domination number of G is the minimum cardinality among all super dominating sets in G. In this article, we obtain closed formulas and tight bounds for the super domination number of G in terms of several invariants of G. Furthermore, the particular cases of corona product graphs and Cartesian product graphs are considered. Keywords: Super domination number; Domination number; Cartesian product; Corona product. AMS Subject Classification numbers: 05C69; 05C70 ; 05C76 1 Introduction arXiv:1705.00928v2 [math.CO] 23 Apr 2018 The open neighbourhood of a vertex v of a graph G is the set N(v) consisting of all vertices adjacent to v in G. For D ⊆ V (G), we define D = V (G) \ D. A set D ⊆ V (G) is dominating in G if every vertex in D has at least one neighbour in D, i.e., N(u) ∩ D =6 ∅ for every u ∈ D.
    [Show full text]
  • Merging Peg Solitaire in Graphs
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science, Faculty Research and Publications Department of (-2019) 7-17-2017 Merging Peg Solitaire in Graphs John Engbers Marquette University, [email protected] Ryan Weber Marquette University Follow this and additional works at: https://epublications.marquette.edu/mscs_fac Part of the Computer Sciences Commons, Mathematics Commons, and the Statistics and Probability Commons Recommended Citation Engbers, John and Weber, Ryan, "Merging Peg Solitaire in Graphs" (2017). Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science Faculty Research and Publications. 629. https://epublications.marquette.edu/mscs_fac/629 INVOLVE 11:1 (2018) :-msp dx.doi.org/10.2140/involve.2018.11.53 Merging peg solitaire on graphs John Engbers and Ryan Weber (Communicated by Anant Godbole) Peg solitaire has recently been generalized to graphs. Here, pegs start on all but one of the vertices in a graph. A move takes pegs on adjacent vertices x and y, with y also adjacent to a hole on vertex z, and jumps the peg on x over the peg on y to z, removing the peg on y. The goal of the game is to reduce the number of pegs to one. We introduce the game merging peg solitaire on graphs, where a move takes pegs on vertices x and z (with a hole on y) and merges them to a single peg on y. When can a confguration on a graph, consisting of pegs on all vertices but one, be reduced to a confguration with only a single peg? We give results for a number of graph classes, including stars, paths, cycles, complete bipartite graphs, and some caterpillars.
    [Show full text]
  • Decomposition of Wheel Graphs Into Stars, Cycles and Paths
    Malaya Journal of Matematik, Vol. 9, No. 1, 456-460, 2021 https://doi.org/10.26637/MJM0901/0076 Decomposition of wheel graphs into stars, cycles and paths M. Subbulakshmi1 and I. Valliammal2* Abstract Let G = (V;E) be a finite graph with n vertices. The Wheel graph Wn is a graph with vertex set fv0;v1;v2;:::;vng and edge-set consisting of all edges of the form vivi+1 and v0vi where 1 ≤ i ≤ n, the subscripts being reduced modulo n. Wheel graph of (n + 1) vertices denoted by Wn. Decomposition of Wheel graph denoted by D(Wn). A star with 3 edges is called a claw S3. In this paper, we show that any Wheel graph can be decomposed into following ways. 8 (n − 2d)S ; d = 1;2;3;::: if n ≡ 0 (mod 6) > 3 > >[(n − 2d) − 1]S3 and P3; d = 1;2;3::: if n ≡ 1 (mod 6) > <[(n − 2d) − 1]S3 and P2; d = 1;2;3;::: if n ≡ 2 (mod 6) D(Wn) = . (n − 2d)S and C ; d = 1;2;3;::: if n ≡ 3 (mod 6) > 3 3 > >(n − 2d)S3 and P3; d = 1;2;3::: if n ≡ 4 (mod 6) > :(n − 2d)S3 and P2; d = 1;2;3;::: if n ≡ 5 (mod 6) Keywords Wheel Graph, Decomposition, claw. AMS Subject Classification 05C70. 1Department of Mathematics, G.V.N. College, Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi-628502, Tamil Nadu, India. 2Department of Mathematics, Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, Tirunelveli-627012, Tamil Nadu, India. *Corresponding author: [email protected]; [email protected] Article History: Received 01 November 2020; Accepted 30 January 2021 c 2021 MJM.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2106.16130V1 [Math.CO] 30 Jun 2021 in the Special Case of Cyclohedra, and by Cardinal, Langerman and P´Erez-Lantero [5] in the Special Case of Tree Associahedra
    LAGOS 2021 Bounds on the Diameter of Graph Associahedra Jean Cardinal1;4 Universit´elibre de Bruxelles (ULB) Lionel Pournin2;4 Mario Valencia-Pabon3;4 LIPN, Universit´eSorbonne Paris Nord Abstract Graph associahedra are generalized permutohedra arising as special cases of nestohedra and hypergraphic polytopes. The graph associahedron of a graph G encodes the combinatorics of search trees on G, defined recursively by a root r together with search trees on each of the connected components of G − r. In particular, the skeleton of the graph associahedron is the rotation graph of those search trees. We investigate the diameter of graph associahedra as a function of some graph parameters. It is known that the diameter of the associahedra of paths of length n, the classical associahedra, is 2n − 6 for a large enough n. We give a tight bound of Θ(m) on the diameter of trivially perfect graph associahedra on m edges. We consider the maximum diameter of associahedra of graphs on n vertices and of given tree-depth, treewidth, or pathwidth, and give lower and upper bounds as a function of these parameters. Finally, we prove that the maximum diameter of associahedra of graphs of pathwidth two is Θ(n log n). Keywords: generalized permutohedra, graph associahedra, tree-depth, treewidth, pathwidth 1 Introduction The vertices and edges of a polyhedron form a graph whose diameter (often referred to as the diameter of the polyhedron for short) is related to a number of computational problems. For instance, the question of how large the diameter of a polyhedron arises naturally from the study of linear programming and the simplex algorithm (see, for instance [27] and references therein).
    [Show full text]
  • Coalition Graphs of Paths, Cycles, and Trees
    Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory xx (xxxx) 1–16 https://doi.org/10.7151/dmgt.2416 COALITION GRAPHS OF PATHS, CYCLES, AND TREES Teresa W. Haynes Department of Mathematics and Statistics East Tennessee State University Johnson City, TN 37604 e-mail: [email protected] Jason T. Hedetniemi Department of Mathematics Wilkes Honors College Florida Atlantic University Jupiter, FL 33458 e-mail: [email protected] Stephen T. Hedetniemi School of Computing Clemson University Clemson, SC 29634 e-mail: [email protected] Alice A. McRae and Raghuveer Mohan Computer Science Department Appalachian State University Boone, NC 28608 e-mail: [email protected] [email protected] Abstract A coalition in a graph G =(V,E) consists of two disjoint sets of vertices V1 and V2, neither of which is a dominating set of G but whose union V1 ∪V2 is a dominating set of G. A coalition partition in a graph G of order n = |V | 2 Haynes, Hedetniemi, Hedetniemi, McRae and Mohan is a vertex partition π = {V1,V2,...,Vk} of V such that every set Vi either is a dominating set consisting of a single vertex of degree n − 1, or is not a dominating set but forms a coalition with another set Vj which is not a dominating set. Associated with every coalition partition π of a graph G is a graph called the coalition graph of G with respect to π, denoted CG(G, π), the vertices of which correspond one-to-one with the sets V1,V2,...,Vk of π and two vertices are adjacent in CG(G, π) if and only if their corresponding sets in π form a coalition.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Threshold-Width of Graphs Maw-Shang Chang 1 Ling-Ju Hung 1 Ton Kloks Sheng-Lung Peng 2
    Journal of Graph Algorithms and Applications http://jgaa.info/ vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 253–268 (2011) On the Threshold-Width of Graphs Maw-Shang Chang 1 Ling-Ju Hung 1 Ton Kloks Sheng-Lung Peng 2 1Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering National Chung Cheng University Min-Hsiung, Chia-Yi 621, Taiwan 2Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering National Dong Hwa University Shoufeng, Hualien 97401, Taiwan Abstract For a graph class G, a graph G has G-width k if there are k independent sets N1,..., Nk in G such that G can be embedded into a graph H ∈G such that for every edge e in H which is not an edge in G, there exists an i such that both endpoints of e are in Ni. For the class TH of threshold graphs we show that TH-width is NP-complete and we present fixed-parameter algorithms. We also show that for each k, graphs of TH-width at most k are characterized by a finite collection of forbidden induced subgraphs. Submitted: Reviewed: Revised: Accepted: September 2010 January 2011 March 2011 April 2011 Final: Published: May 2011 July 2011 Article type: Communicated by: Regular paper D. Wagner This research was supported by the National Science Council of Taiwan, under grants NSC 98– 2218–E–194–004 and NSC 98–2811–E–194–006. Ton Kloks is supported by the National Science Council of Taiwan, under grants the National Science Council of Taiwan, under grants NSC 99–2218–E–007–016 and NSC 99–2811–E–007–044.
    [Show full text]
  • The Classification of B-Perfect Graphs
    The classification of B-perfect graphs Stephan Dominique Andres Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, FernUniversit¨at in Hagen, Germany Key words: game chromatic number, game-perfectness, trivially perfect, graph colouring game 1 Introduction Consider the following game, played on an (initially uncolored) graph G = (V, E) with a color set C. The players, Alice and Bob, move alternately. A move consists in coloring a vertex v ∈ V with a color c ∈ C in such a way that adjacent vertices receive distinct colors. If this is not possible any more, the game ends. Alice wins if every vertex is colored in the end, otherwise Bob wins. This type of game was introduced by Bodlaender [2]. He considers a variant, which we will call game g, in which Alice must move first and passing is not allowed. In order to obtain upper and lower bounds for a parameter associated with game g, two other variants are useful. In the game B Bob may move first. He may also miss one or several turns, but Alice must always move. In the other variant, game A, Alice may move first and miss one or several turns, but Bob must move. So in game B Bob has some advantages, whereas in game A Alice has some advantages with respect to Bodlaender’s game. For any variant G∈{B,g,A}, the smallest cardinality of a color set C, so that Alice has a winning strategy for the game G is called G-game chromatic number χG(G) of G. Email address: [email protected] (Stephan Dominique Andres).
    [Show full text]
  • A Characterization of General Position Sets in Graphs
    A characterization of general position sets in graphs Bijo S. Anand a Ullas Chandran S. V. b Manoj Changat c Sandi Klavˇzar d;e;f Elias John Thomas g November 16, 2018 a Department of Mathematics, Sree Narayana College, Punalur-691305, Kerala, India; bijos [email protected] b Department of Mathematics, Mahatma Gandhi College, Kesavadasapuram, Thiruvananthapuram-695004, Kerala, India; [email protected] c Department of Futures Studies, University of Kerala Thiruvananthapuram-695034, Kerala, India; [email protected] d Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia [email protected] e Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, University of Maribor, Slovenia f Institute of Mathematics, Physics and Mechanics, Ljubljana, Slovenia g Department of Mathematics, Mar Ivanios College, Thiruvananthapuram-695015, Kerala, India; [email protected] Abstract A vertex subset S of a graph G is a general position set of G if no vertex of S lies on a geodesic between two other vertices of S. The cardinality of a largest general position set of G is the general position number gp(G) of G. It is proved that S ⊆ V (G) is a general position set if and only if the components of G[S] are complete subgraphs, the vertices of which form an in-transitive, distance-constant partition of S. If diam(G) = 2, then gp(G) is the maximum of the clique number of G and the maximum order of an induced complete multipartite subgraph of the complement of G. As a consequence, gp(G) of a cograph G can be determined in polynomial time.
    [Show full text]
  • On Retracts, Absolute Retracts, and Folds In
    ON RETRACTS,ABSOLUTE RETRACTS, AND FOLDS IN COGRAPHS Ton Kloks1 and Yue-Li Wang2 1 Department of Computer Science National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan [email protected] 2 Department of Information Management National Taiwan University of Science and Technology [email protected] Abstract. Let G and H be two cographs. We show that the problem to determine whether H is a retract of G is NP-complete. We show that this problem is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by the size of H. When restricted to the class of threshold graphs or to the class of trivially perfect graphs, the problem becomes tractable in polynomial time. The problem is also solvable in linear time when one cograph is given as an in- duced subgraph of the other. We characterize absolute retracts for the class of cographs. Foldings generalize retractions. We show that the problem to fold a trivially perfect graph onto a largest possible clique is NP-complete. For a threshold graph this folding number equals its chromatic number and achromatic number. 1 Introduction Graph homomorphisms have regained a lot of interest by the recent characteri- zation of Grohe of the classes of graphs for which Hom(G, -) is tractable [11]. To be precise, Grohe proves that, unless FPT = W[1], deciding whether there is a homomorphism from a graph G 2 G to some arbitrary graph H is polynomial if and only if the graphs in G have bounded treewidth modulo homomorphic equiv- alence. The treewidth of a graph modulo homomorphic equivalence is defined as the treewidth of its core, ie, a minimal retract.
    [Show full text]
  • Graph Theory in the Analysis of Arithmophobia
    International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE) ISSN: 2278-3075, Volume-8 Issue-12, October 2019 Graph Theory in the Analysis of Arithmophobia A. Uma Maheswari, A.S.Purnalakshimi Abstract: In this paper, Graph theoretical concepts are applied 2. Dizziness to analyze the reasons behind Arithmophobia commonly found 3. Excessive sweating . among the students.Bull graph is used to epitomize Mild 4. Palpitation Arithmophobia which occurs when the preparation of students to 5. Inability to think clearly face any test is deficient.Flower graph is used to represent Intense 6. Sensational detachment from reality Arithmophobia. Wheel graph is used to depict the factors which desensitize Arithmophobia. Inferring information from these 7. Passive behavior types of graphs is much more easier than inferring from a self 8. Unwillingness to try map. This analysis will help in treating Arithmophobia and 9. Chest pain in very rare cases improve the student’s performance in Mathematics progressively. 10. A fully blown anxiety attack The benefits of using interactive graphical interface, graphs and graph theory metrics for a client centered analysis is also C. Analytical Process Flow discussed. A questionnaire with 12 simple questions were Keywords : Phobia, Arithmophobia, Desensitize. prepared and survey was taken from nearly 120 students.The questionnaire was prepared keeping in mind the causes of I. INTRODUCTION Arithmophobia mentioned above.The fact that is inferred from the survey that 98% of the students have Arithmophobia Graph theory originated ,way back in 1736 is one of the most is appalling. As kids the students are interested in interesting branches of Mathematics and serves as a tool to mathematics since it deals with only four operations uncover the nature of physical reality .Graphs are used to (addition, subtraction, multiplication and division )and is model many types of relationships, physical,biological quite different from their other theory subjects.
    [Show full text]
  • Linear Separation of Connected Dominating Sets in Graphs∗
    ISSN 1855-3966 (printed edn.), ISSN 1855-3974 (electronic edn.) ARS MATHEMATICA CONTEMPORANEA 16 (2019) 487–525 https://doi.org/10.26493/1855-3974.1330.916 (Also available at http://amc-journal.eu) Linear separation of connected dominating sets in graphs∗ Nina Chiarelli y, Martin Milanicˇ z University of Primorska, UP FAMNIT, Glagoljaskaˇ 8, SI-6000 Koper, Slovenia University of Primorska, UP IAM, Muzejski trg 2, SI-6000 Koper, Slovenia Received 21 February 2017, accepted 12 November 2018, published online 15 March 2019 Abstract A connected dominating set in a graph is a dominating set of vertices that induces a connected subgraph. Following analogous studies in the literature related to independent sets, dominating sets, and total dominating sets, we study in this paper the class of graphs in which the connected dominating sets can be separated from the other vertex subsets by a linear weight function. More precisely, we say that a graph is connected-domishold if it admits non-negative real weights associated to its vertices such that a set of vertices is a connected dominating set if and only if the sum of the corresponding weights exceeds a certain threshold. We characterize the graphs in this non-hereditary class in terms of a property of the set of minimal cutsets of the graph. We give several char- acterizations for the hereditary case, that is, when each connected induced subgraph is required to be connected-domishold. The characterization by forbidden induced subgraphs implies that the class properly generalizes two well known classes of chordal graphs, the block graphs and the trivially perfect graphs.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Threshold of Intractability
    On the Threshold of Intractability P˚alGrøn˚asDrange∗ Markus Sortland Dregi∗ Daniel Lokshtanov∗ Blair D. Sullivany May 4, 2015 Abstract We study the computational complexity of the graph modification problems Threshold Editing and Chain Editing, adding and deleting as few edges as possible to transform the input into a threshold (or chain) graph. In this article, we show that both problems are NP-hard, resolving a conjecture by Natanzon, Shamir, and Sharan (Discrete Applied Mathematics, 113(1):109{128, 2001). On the positive side, we show the problem admits a quadratic vertex kernel. Furthermore,p we give a subexponential time parameterized algorithm solving Threshold Editing in 2O( k log k) + poly(n) time, making it one of relatively few natural problems in this complexity class on general graphs. These results are of broader interest to the field of social network analysis, where recent work of Brandes (ISAAC, 2014) posits that the minimum edit distance to a threshold graph gives a good measure of consistency for node centralities. Finally, we show that all our positive results extend to the related problem of Chain Editing, as well as the completion and deletion variants of both problems. 1 Introduction In this paper we study the computational complexity of two edge modification problems, namely editing to threshold graphs and editing to chain graphs. Graph modification problems ask whether a given graph G can be transformed to have a certain property using a small number of edits (such as deleting/adding vertices or edges), and have been the subject of significant previous work [29,7,8,9, 25].
    [Show full text]