DOCSLIB.ORG

N8 PRP Annual Report 2019/20

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
N8 PRP Annual Report 2019/20 N8 PRP Annual Report 2019/20 POLICING RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP n8prp.org.uk Contents Foreword by Andy Cooke ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Director’s Introduction – Adam Crawford .....................................................................................................................................................................4 Introducing the New Leadership Team: Academic Co-Director - Geoff Pearson .......................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Policing Co-Director – Ngaire Waine .............................................................................................................................................................................8 1 Partnerships and Evidence-Based Policing Policing and the N8 Research Partnership – Annette Bramley ...................................................................................................................10 In Conversation with Justin Partridge .................................................................................................................................................................. 12 In Conversation with ACC Chris Sykes ................................................................................................................................................................. 15 From Evidence-Based Policing to Practice – Andy Fielding ........................................................................................................................ 16 You Cannot Claim To Be Aspirational About The Future Whilst Clinging So Tightly To The Past – Rob Ewin ........................ 18 Fragile Alliances: Culture, Funding And Sustainability In Police-Academic Partnerships – Matt Bacon, Joanna Shapland, Layla Skinns and Adam White ...............................................................................................................................................................................................20 Co-Production In Crisis? Shared Challenges For Policing And Academia – Liz Aston .....................................................................22 Forty Years Of Conducting Research For, And With, The Police – Johannes Knutson ..................................................................................24 2 Data Analytics and Training Reflecting on the Role of Data Specialists in Policing – Fiona McLaughlin............................................................................................26 Training and Learning: A Review – Jude Towers .............................................................................................................................................28 Why the Programme for ‘Data Specialists in Policing’ is more important now than ever – Scott Keay ......................................30 Practitioners’ Experience of the N8 ‘Empowering Data Specialists in Policing’ CPD Course – Andrew White .......................32 Practitioners’ Experience of the N8 ‘Empowering Data Specialists in Policing’ CPD Course – ‘Northern Analysis Group’ ....34 3 Evaluation, Impact and the Small Grant Scheme First Four Years of the N8 PRP – Tiggey May, Richard Sen and Mike Hough .........................................................................................36 Police/Academic Perspectives on Evidence: Implications for Co-Production – Mike Rowe, Pam Davies, Donna Marie Brown and Paul Biddle .....................................................................................................................................................................38 Unquantifiable Benefits: Some Notes On The Evaluation Of The Small Grants Programme – Geoff Page .............................. 40 Identifying Sexual Trafficking Online – Xavier L’Hoiry, Dr Alessandro Moretti and Georgios Antonopoulos..........................42 Policing Child-to-Parent Violence: Lessons from England and Wales – Sam Lewis, Ella Holdsworth and Jose Pina-Sánchez .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 44 4 Insights from Policing the Pandemic Police And Research Collaborations In A Covid-19 World – Gloria Laycock .........................................................................................46 COVID-19: Predicting Crime in a Pandemic World – Eric Halford ........................................................................................................... 48 The N8 PRP’s Response to COVID-19 .....................................................................................................................................................................51 5 Innovation and Leadership Tackling Knife Crime from Existing Resources – Steve Brookes ................................................................................................................52 Developing and Implementing a Violence Reduction Strategy – Rachael Staniforth ........................................................................54 A Strategic Review of Policing – Rick Muir ..........................................................................................................................................................56 Legitimacy, Leadership and Governance – Ian Shannon .............................................................................................................................58 Police Use Of Body Worn Cameras – Declan Falconer .................................................................................................................................. 60 Alcohol And Mental Health: Reducing Stigma And Harm In Uk Police Officers – Patricia Irizar ..................................................62 N8 PRP BY NUMBERS ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................65 1 n8prp.org.uk Foreword am delighted to provide this foreword to the 2020 Annual Report, as the N8 Policing Research Partnership I moves to a new phase in its development with the establishment of a co-funding model with a shared directorship by academic and policing partners. The world is changing faster than ever and so too is the landscape of crime and how we tackle it. Added to those challenges, is how the UK will look as we emerge from the ravages of the pandemic and what impact this will have on criminality and vulnerability. These challenges and complexities necessitate a nimble, effective and professional response and such skills are enhanced through partnerships like the N8 PRP. This has been evidenced in recent evaluations of the N8 Policing Research Partnership (including the Birkbeck College study reported here) which demonstrate how the partnership has helped to foster police innovations through research, enabled collaborations, provided skills training for analysts and fostered organisational learning across policing. My own force has a vision to work as one team, putting its communities first and recognising that the effectiveness of policing will depend on the quality of our relationships with our communities. Partnerships, such as that with the N8 PRP, are instrumental to the effectiveness of our policing capability and this has been demonstrated in Merseyside through the Coercive Control research and evaluation funded by an N8 PRP small grant. In this the role of the N8 PRP was crucial as the principal facilitator of the collaboration between Lancaster University and Merseyside Police’s Evidence Based Practice Hub. The research provided a significant and crucial insight into our response to Domestic Abuse and Coercive Control, the results of which highlighted some vital organisational learning points and best practice. Consequently, a training package was developed, incorporating the results of the research, which was delivered to over 700 staff across the force and has since been embedded into the training programme for the long term. I am very much looking forward to further collaborations through the N8 PRP and the benefits that such partnerships produce across UK law enforcement. I am delighted that one of my colleagues, Chief Superintendent Ngaire Waine will help provide the N8 PRP with leadership as the new Co-Director of the partnership. Andy Cooke QPM Chief Constable Merseyside Police 2 3 n8prp.org.uk on those people whose vulnerability dependent on much more than the pandemic. I have been impressed by derives from their precarious and coercive powers to enforce and punish the varied ways in which collaborations Director’s Introduction sometimes problematic relationship transgressions. It depends on the between researchers and front-line with the police as an institution; complex interplay between a diversity officers, as well as policing managers, t gives me considerable pleasure to introduce the fifth Annual those who due to their social of actors and agencies with differing have been mobilise so rapidly to assist Report of the N8 Policing Research Partnership (N8 PRP), my disadvantage, marginalisation or competencies and responsibilities, with unfolding challenges of policing. last as Director. Since we launched the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Landscape Analysis
    The UK’s research and innovation infrastructure: Landscape Analysis 3 Contents Executive summary 6 Chapter 1: Introduction 8 1.1 Scope and definition of research and innovation infrastructure 9 1.2 Infrastructure diversity 10 1.3 Scale and coverage 11 1.4 Questionnaire methodology, limitations and potential bias 13 Chapter 2: Overview of the landscape 15 2.1 The cross-disciplinary nature of infrastructures 17 2.2 Large scale multi-sector facilities 18 Chapter 3: Lifecycle 21 3.1 Concept 22 3.2 Current lifecycle landscape 23 3.3 Evolution of the landscape 26 3.4 Lifecycle and planning 26 Chapter 4: International collaboration and cooperation 28 4.1 International collaboration 29 4.2. Staffing 29 4.3 International user base 30 Chapter 5: Skills and staffing 32 5.1 Numbers 33 5.2 Roles 36 5.3 Staff diversity 36 Chapter 6: Operations 38 6.1 Set-up capital costs 39 6.2 Sources of funding 41 6.3 Primary funding source 42 Chapter 7: Measuring usage and capacity 43 7.1 Usage 44 7.2 Measuring capacity 45 7.3 Managing capacity 47 7.4 Barriers to performance 49 Chapter 8: Links to the economy 52 8.1 Working with businesses 53 Chapter 9: Biological sciences, health and food sector 56 9.1 Current landscape 57 9.2 Interdependency with e-infrastructure 63 9.3 Engagement with the wider economy 63 4 Chapter 10: Physical sciences and engineering sector 65 10.1 The current landscape 67 10.2 Characterising the sector 69 10.3 The importance of international collaboration 71 10.4 Impacts 71 Chapter 11: Social sciences, arts and humanities sector 73 11.1 Form
    [Show full text]
  • Read the Newcastle University Economic Impact Report
    ECONOMIC IMPACT REPORT Our economic impact Engagement Our and partnerships Students International Knowledge profile economy Business Research and engagement innovation Excellence with a Purpose CONTENTS Overview 1 Foreword 2 Our economic impact 5 Our students 6 Knowledge economy 8 Research and innovation 9 Business engagement 10 International profile 12 Engagement and partnerships 14 Case studies: 1: Rural sustainability 16 2: City futures 17 3: Employer engagement 18 4: Partnering with business 19 5: Showcasing creativity 20 The Economic Impact 1 of Newcastle University OVERVIEW Newcastle University was formally established in 1963, but can trace its roots to the School of Medicine and Surgery, which was founded in Newcastle upon Tyne in 1834. Today’s University is a thriving international community of 27,750 students and 5,780 staff, the majority of whom are based on our main city-centre campus and other sites around the city. In recent years, we have expanded our footprint to include two international campuses, in Malaysia and Singapore, which opened in 2011 and 2008 respectively, while our newest branch campus, Newcastle University London, opened in September 2015. The University is a member of the internationally renowned Russell Group, an association of 24 leading research-intensive universities in the UK, and of the N8 Research Partnership, which features the eight research-intensive universities in the North of England. We are ranked among the top 1% of world universities, according to the QS (Quacquarelli Symonds) World Rankings. In 2016, Newcastle became one of only 16 universities in the world, and one of two in the UK, to achieve Five Plus QS Stars in the first international assessment of its kind.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 N8/Yorkshire Universities Joint Response to David
    N8/YORKSHIRE UNIVERSITIES JOINT RESPONSE TO DAVID SWEENEY The N8 Research Partnership and Yorkshire Universities (YU) together represent 17 higher education institutions (HEIs) in the north of England. Our members make major contributions towards the UK’s research and innovation base. They are also critical institutions in supporting local and regional development, and act as key anchor institutions underpinning place-making in many cities, towns and communities across the north. We welcome the questions posed by David Sweeney, Executive Chair of Research England, in his recent blog for WonkHE1. This joint response by N8 and YU represents a contribution to the important debate about the role of place in research and innovation policy, strategy and funding in the UK. Executive Summary: • Research capacity and funding is not sufficiently spatially distributed in the UK. This reinforces imbalances and inequalities in the UK economy, and is an opportunity cost for UK Productivity and R&D targets. • In order to address this, there needs to be a greater emphasis on place and developing regional R&I ecosystems, which engage partners in the public and private sectors, as well as local citizens; • Definitions of excellence should be reviewed reflecting value of collaborative research which is locally embedded and impactful. Conventional peer review methods, which are accustomed to traditional measures of excellence, may need to be reviewed for funding schemes for which other factors are also strategically important; • Programmes should not be one-size fits all, but informed by regional knowledge. The approach should be flexible and long-term; • To make transformational change, SIPF awards could usefully be significantly larger and longer in duration; • Building capacity and local knowledge could be supported by developing new place-based collaborative research models, disseminating knowledge and informing policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Assistance, Crime Prevention, Organised Crime
    Technical Assistance, Crime Prevention, Organised Crime Presentations at the HEUNI 25th Anniversary Symposium (January 2007) and at the Stockholm Criminology Symposium (June 2007) Kauko Aromaa and Terhi Viljanen, editors No. 28 2008 HEUNI Paper No. 28 Technical Assistance, Crime Prevention, Organised Crime Presentations at the HEUNI 25th Anniversary Symposium (January 2007) and at the Stockholm Criminology Symposium (June 2007) Kauko Aromaa and Terhi Viljanen, editors The European Institute for Crime Prevention and Control, affiliated with the United Nations Helsinki, 2008 This document is available electronically from: http://www.heuni.fi HEUNI The European Institute for Crime Prevention and Control, affiliated with the United Nations P.O.Box 444 FIN-00531 Helsinki Finland Tel: +358-103665280 Fax: +358-103665290 e-mail:[email protected] http://www.heuni.fi ISSN 1236-8245 Contents Foreword .......................................................................................................................... 7 Applied Knowledge: Technical Assistance to Prevent Crime and Improve Criminal Justice Kuniko Ozaki ................................................................. 9 Speaking Note for HEUNI 25th Birthday Event Gloria Laycock................................11 HEUNI Károly Bárd ........................................................................................................ 13 Ideas on How a Regional Institute Like HEUNI Could Best Promote Knowledge-Based Criminal Policy and What the Role of Member States Could Be Pirkko Lahti
    [Show full text]
  • Independent Review of the Scottish Funding Council's Research
    Independent Review of the Scottish Funding Council’s Research Pooling Initiative Chaired by Professor Louise Heathwaite CBE FRSE Contents page Preface Executive summary 1. Introduction 2. The review process 3. Brief background to the Research Pooling Initiative 4. The evidence base 5. Evidence analysis 6. Conclusions and recommendations 7. List of advisory panel members 8. Appendices 2 Preface by Professor Louise Heathwaite CBE FRSE I was delighted to be asked by Mike Cantlay OBE (Chair of the Scottish Funding Council, SFC) and Professor Lesley Yellowlees CBE (Chair of SFC’s Research and Knowledge Exchange Committee, RKEC) to lead this independent review of the Research Pooling Initiative (RPI). Scotland’s major investment in, and long-term commitment to growing critical mass and driving collaboration across its core science disciplines was prescient and has been copied widely elsewhere. Since 2005, SFC has invested over £155m in eleven research pools, matched by over £330m from Scottish Universities and co-funding of almost £10m from the Office for Science & Technology and the Chief Scientist’s Office. Given the continued evolution of the research landscape in Scotland and the UK, now is a good time to evaluate whether the concept of research pooling remains fit for purpose. My remit was to undertake a high-level and summative analysis to establish the impact of SFC's investment in the pooling initiative on the Scottish research environment to date and to provide recommendations on the development of this and SFC’s future investment in research. I am hugely grateful to every member of my Advisory Panel for their valuable guidance and critical insight throughout the review process and particularly for their fortitude and good humour during the oral evidence sessions when the days were very long indeed.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report for 2018-19
    Yorkshire Universities 2018-19 Annual Report and Accounts yorkshireuniversities.ac.uk YorkshireUnis Reference and administrative details for the year ended 31 July 2019 Registered office: 22 Clarendon Place, Leeds, LS2 9JY Registered company number: 03467035 Registered charity number: 1109200 Independent examiner: Mark Heaton FCCA DChA KM Chartered Accountants 1st Floor Block C The Wharf Manchester Road Burnley Lancashire BB11 1JG Bankers: Unity Trust Bank plc Nine Brindley Place Birmingham West Midlands B1 2HB Cambridge & Counties Bank Charnwood Court 5B New Walk Leicester LE1 6TE Manchester Building Society 125 Portland Street Manchester M1 4QD CONTENTS Chair’s foreword .................................................................................................................... 1 Statement of trustees’ responsibilities ................................................................................... 2 Governance, structure and risk management ........................................................................ 3 Mission ................................................................................................................................. 5 Objectives and achievements ............................................................................................... 5 Future plans ........................................................................................................................ 10 Financial review .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Making the Best Better
    MAKING THE BEST BETTER UK Research and Innovation More efficient and effective for the global economy Report for Department of Business, Innovation and Skills By Sarah Jackson On secondment from the N8 Research Partnership 30 March 2013 1 MAKING THE BEST BETTER UK Research and Innovation More efficient and effective for the global economy The purpose of this report is to document and analyse evidence of the efficiencies within the higher education research base. The evidence has been collected from existing reports and data, combined with new case studies. Providing recommendations for future efficiency savings is explicitly outside the scope of this work. Key highlights and conclusions The higher education sector is moving towards a ten year track record of delivering efficiencies, including headline savings of over £1.38bn over CSRs 2004 and 20071, and Research Councils delivering savings of £428m over the current CSR period. These efficiencies have been achieved using two key drivers: a. Increasing domestic and international competition b. Science ring fence, allowing reinvestment of savings to increase world class performance of universities. The evidence collected for this report shows a strong ten-year track record of institutions delivering both operational and productive efficiencies, which is improving research and teaching. This strong link between driving efficiencies and improving student experience and better research is increasing investment in skills, knowledge and human capital. Capital budgets are being utilised more effectively, primarily through creating clusters of excellence and sharing equipment. This is delivering state-of-the-art facilities, enabling new science and better equipment and expertise for business. The increased effectiveness of the system is delivering both greater outputs for science and research, and also greater impact in the global marketplace: generating new knowledge, leveraging private investment in R&D and increasing the quality of human capital.
    [Show full text]
  • The Government's Approach to Crime Prevention
    House of Commons Home Affairs Committee The Government’s Approach to Crime Prevention Tenth Report of Session 2009–10 Volume II Oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 16 March 2010 HC 242-II Published on 29 March 2010 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £16.50 The Home Affairs Committee The Home Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Home Office and its associated public bodies. Current membership Rt Hon Keith Vaz MP (Labour, Leicester East) (Chair) Tom Brake MP (Liberal Democrat, Carshalton and Wallington) Mr James Clappison MP (Conservative, Hertsmere) Mrs Ann Cryer MP (Labour, Keighley) David TC Davies MP (Conservative, Monmouth) Mrs Janet Dean MP (Labour, Burton) Mr Khalid Mahmood MP (Labour, Birmingham Perry Barr) Patrick Mercer MP (Conservative, Newark) Margaret Moran MP (Labour, Luton South) Gwyn Prosser MP (Labour, Dover) Bob Russell MP (Liberal Democrat, Colchester) Martin Salter MP (Labour, Reading West) Mr Gary Streeter MP (Conservative, South West Devon) Mr David Winnick MP (Labour, Walsall North) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/homeaffairscom. A list of Reports of the Committee since Session 2005–06 is at the back of this volume.
    [Show full text]
  • Autumn 2005 SCIENCE in PARLIAMENT
    Autumn 2005 SCIENCE IN PARLIAMENT State of the Nation Plastic Waste Private Finance Initiative Visions of Science Airbus Launches the New A350 The Journal of the Parliamentary and Scientific Committee http://www.scienceinparliament.org.uk THE STATE OF THE NATION 2005 An assessment of the UK’s infrastructure by the Institution of Civil Engineers PUBLISHED 18 OCTOBER 2005 About the Institution of Civil Engineers About the report As a professional body, the The State of the Nation Report For more information on the Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE) is compiled each year by a panel background to the State of the is one of the most important of civil engineering experts. The Nation Report, contact ICE sources of professional expertise report’s aim is to stimulate debate External Relations: in road and rail transport, water and to highlight the actions that supply and treatment, flood ICE believes need to be taken to t +44 (0)20 7665 2151 management, waste and energy – improve the UK’s infrastructure. e [email protected] our infrastructure. Established in It has been produced since 2000. w www.uk-infrastructure.org.uk 1818, it has over 75,000 members This year, six regional versions throughout the world – including of the State of the Nation Report – over 60,000 in the UK. covering Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales as well as the North West, South West and West Midlands of England – are being produced, in conjunction with the UK-wide publication. To read the complete report please visit www.uk-infrastructure.org.uk Registered Charity No.
    [Show full text]
  • Enterprising Universities Using the Research Base to Add Value to Business
    Policy Report September 2010 Enterprising Universities Using the research base to add value to business 1100901_EnterprisingUniversities.indd00901_EnterprisingUniversities.indd A 009/09/20109/09/2010 115:025:02 The 1994 Group > The 1994 Group is established to promote excellence in university research and teaching. It represents 19 of the UK’s leading research-intensive, student focused universities. Around half of the top 20 universities in UK national league tables are members of the group. > Each member institution delivers an extremely high standard of education, demonstrating excellence in research, teaching and academic support, and provides learning in a research-rich community. > The 1994 Group counts amongst its members 12 of the top 20 universities in the Guardian University Guide 2011 league tables published on the 8th June 2010. 7 of the top 10 universities for student experience are 1994 Group Universities (2009 National Student Survey). In 17 major subject areas 1994 Group universities are the UK leaders achieving 1st place in their fi eld (THE RAE subject rankings 2008). 57% of the 1994 Group's research is rated 4* 'world- leading' or 3* 'internationally excellent' (RAE 2008, HEFCE). > The 1994 Group represents: University of Bath, Birkbeck University of London, Durham University, University of East Anglia, University of Essex, University of Exeter, Goldsmiths University of London, Institute of Education University of London, Royal Holloway University of London, Lancaster University, University of Leicester, Loughborough
    [Show full text]
  • The British Innovation Fund Investing in the Best of UK University Venturing
    The British Innovation Fund Investing in the Best of UK University Venturing For discussion purposes with Professional Investors only 2Q 2020 BRITISH INNOVATION FUND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Key Areas of Specialty: Agricultural Bio- Technologies technology The BIF has been backed by some of The BIF is managed in the leading local The British Innovation partnership with government pension Deep Tech Life Sciences Milltrust International LLP Fund (BIF) is an schemes in the and Milltrust Agricultural AIFMD-compliant United Kingdom patient capital venture Investments, and supported by an capital fund investing in cutting edge spin- Alternative Advisory team of Nano Tech investment specialists outs emanating from Protein and agricultural and leading UK university research. scientific experts. 2 INVESTMENT PREMISE “Exploration is the engine that drives innovation. Innovation drives economic growth.” - Edith Widder 3 INVESTMENT PREMISE A BRIEF HISTORY OF BRITISH INNOVATION Sir Isaac Newton, PRS 25 December 1642 – 20 March 1726 Sir Alexander Fleming, FRS FRSE FRCS English mathematician, physicist, astronomer, 6 August 1881 – 11 March 1955 theologian, and author widely recognised as one of the Scottish biologist, physician, micro-biologist, most influential scientists of all time and as a key figure and pharmacologist. Inventor of Penicillin. in the scientific revolution. Edward Jenner, FRS FRCPE FLS John Logie Baird, FRSE 17 May 1749 – 26 January 1823 13 August 1888 – 14 June 1946 English physician who was a contributor to the Scottish engineer and innovator. One of the inventors of development of the smallpox vaccine. the mechanical television. Michael Faraday, FRS 22 September 1791 – 25 August 1867 John Adrian Shepherd-Barron, OBE English scientist who contributed to the study 23 June 1925 – 15 May 2010 of electromagnetism and electrochemistry.
    [Show full text]
  • New Fonts Strand 5 Hudson Report Layout 1
    New Fonts Strand 5 Hudson Report:Layout 1 13/09/2011 09:09 Page a N8 Research Partnership The impacts of demographic change in the functional economies of the North of England Summary Report Ray Hudson Durham University with Lisa Buckner University of Leeds Tom Cannon University of Liverpool Alan Harding University of Manchester Kasia Kurowska Newcastle University Philip Rees University of Leeds New Fonts Strand 5 Hudson Report:Layout 1 13/09/2011 09:09 Page b New Fonts Strand 5 Hudson Report:Layout 1 13/09/2011 09:09 Page i N8 Research Partnership The impacts of demographic change in the functional economies of the North of England Summary Report Ray Hudson Durham University Contact author: Ray Hudson Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Partnerships and Engagement), Durham University, University Office, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP, UK Telephone: +44 (0)191 334 6045 Email: [email protected] New Fonts Strand 5 Hudson Report:Layout 1 13/09/2011 09:09 Page ii About the N8 The N8 is a group of the eight most research intensive universities in the North — Durham, Lancaster, Leeds, Liverpool, Manchester, Newcastle, Sheffield and York. All N8 universities are ranked in the top 200 of the World University Rankings. Combined, the N8 universities have 125 “top 10” subject rankings in the UK (RAE 2008). The N8 partnership was created in 2007, establishing virtual research centres in Regenerative Medicine and Molecular Engineering. It was a novel way of creating a confluence of research assets and capabilities across the partnership, with sufficient scale and critical mass, to move on broader industrial and commercial opportunities.
    [Show full text]