DOCSLIB.ORG

ACRL Publications in Librarianship Open Peer Review Code of Conduct

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ACRL Publications in Librarianship Open Peer Review Code of Conduct ACRL Publications in Librarianship Open Peer Review Monograph title: Stories of Open: Opening Peer Review through Narrative Inquiry Author: Emily Ford Review close: Monday, March 23, 2020 Google document available at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KFiAhP9hp1hQpWEEdQ4gts4tEaD4uu5G6Yt5YIY5pMk/ edit# Code of Conduct Reviewers agree to: ● provide objective reviews that deliver constructive criticism in a positive and professional manner ● support their recommendations with clearly developed examples or arguments ● focus on substantive comments and suggestions on the content; the book will be professionally copyedited and designed, so formatting, typos, and other grammatical errors will be addressed later in the production process ● look for the following as they review: ○ significance of topic ○ conceptually/theoretically grounded ○ appropriate methodology/research design ○ coherent discussion ○ valid conclusions ○ advancement of knowledge ○ clear, articulate, and well written ● value diversity and inclusion in the review process ● meet all deadlines, or notify the Publications in Librarianship Editor as soon as possible if unable to meet deadlines ● maintain confidentiality of other reviewers’ comments ● recuse themselves from reviewing manuscripts for which they lack expertise, have any undisclosed conflicts of interest, or are unable to meet all deadlines ● consult with the Publications in Librarianship Editor if they have any questions: ○ Daniel Mack, Associate Dean, Collection Strategies and Services, University of Maryland ○ email: [email protected] ○ voice: 301.405.9264 Identifying and Contact Information Please send your name, position, email, and institutional affiliation (if any) with your comments to the Publications in Librarianship editor: Daniel Mack, Associate Dean, Collection Strategies and Services, University of Maryland email: [email protected] voice: 301.405.9264. Stories of Open: Opening Peer Review through Narrative Inquiry Emily Ford Table of Contents Part 1 - Orientation Ch. 1 - A Meta-Story: The Story of Stories of Open Ch. 2 - Discovering Method: Narrative Inquiry Part 2 – The Story Middle Ch. 3 - The Elusive Norm: Peer Review in LIS Ch. 4 - Roles of Peer Review Ch. 5 - Dualities and Multiplicities in Peer Review Ch. 6 - Collaborative Work and Discourse Community Ch. 7 - Transparency of Process Part 3 – Coda Ch. 8 - Storying Stories Ch. 9 - I just feel like this makes sense to me: Stuart’s Story Ch. 10 - The Next Layer of Publishing Transparency: Open Peer Review Ch. 11 - Crafting Future Stories of Openness Part 1: Orientation Ch. 1 - A Meta-Story: The Story of Stories of Open Why this book? “It’s just a process that hasn’t been questioned in forever and it needs to be” said Cheryl as we were sitting in a small study room at a branch of our local public library. The faint smell of cigarettes lingered in the study room from its previous occupant, and muffled giggles and cries of children filtered in as we spoke. I was fooling with my laptop, trying to get pertinent documents in Word to function, despite the corrupted install job that had been completed on my new grant-funded laptop. It didn’t work and I felt flustered. Despite this setback, I was ready to learn from her. What did she have to share of her experience, and what kind of meaning would we create together in this hour and a half? We were talking about peer review. I had asked Cheryl why she wanted to participate in this project as an interviewee. When she said it, I didn’t know that it would be the title of her interpretive story, the document culminating from our conversation, nor did I know that it would be how I opened this book. For years, since my time as a co-founder and editor at In the Library with the Lead Pipe, a peer- reviewed blog turned journal, I have been fascinated by open peer review. Our open peer- review process was something we “invented” as we began the journal, and something that I discovered to be invaluable during that time. Yet over the years I have learned that it’s not widely accepted or understood. Perhaps people fear it because it’s unknown, or simply we have naiveté—we don’t know anything different. We, academic librarians, don’t collectively know it. Few of us have experienced it and most of us don’t understand it. Recently I was catching up on my podcast listening and was delighted to hear Radiolab’s Latif Nasser talking about how he finds stories. “I tell myself that there are 7.5 billion people on planet earth… and if you presume that one percent of those 7.5 billion people have those stories, there’s no way all those stories are getting told…There’s an infinity of stories all around us.”[i] I truly believe that when we open ourselves to others’ experiences, we in turn reflect on our own. We have much to learn about ourselves by listening to others. That is why I’ve approached my work in stories, and that is why stories matter. This book is as much about discovering method and process as it is about sharing the stories in the hopes that it will incite our academic library community to reflect on our own experiences and imagine the possibilities to create new and improved ones. Readers who wish to discover answers to tightly scoped research questions backed by deep dives into academic literature and evidence will be highly disappointed. This book does not do that. Rather its intent is to share collective discoveries and explorations on a theme. It is here to share our colleagues’ stories so that we may reflect on our own, and potentially re-imagine future stories. Open Peer Review While Chapter 10, The Next Layer of Publishing Transparency: Open Peer Review, provides a closer look at open peer review, it remains pertinent to discuss it broadly in this introduction. Just what do we mean by open peer review? Although I and others have attempted to unpack this seemingly simple question, there still doesn’t remain a simple definition or application. Essentially, open peer review is an “opening up” of the peer review process. It could mean that referees sign their reviews for authors to see, such as may occur at BioMed Central journals. “Open peer review as practised by BMC, specifically refers to open identities and open content, i.e. authors know who the reviewers are and if the manuscript is accepted for publication the named reviewer reports accompany the published article.” [ii] I particularly love this framing of open peer review, because it positions the process as a practice, and each person, each community, may practice something in a different way. And this is how it shakes out. Each implementation of open peer review, as I have observed, is different and nuanced. Some implementations allow for the publication of reviewer reports alongside publications, whereas others keep these reviewer reports opaque. Open peer review may also mean that authors have the opportunity to more deeply and meaningfully engage with referees. During the process identities may be open, and the process itself may allow for discourse to occur on collaborative platforms like Google Docs, or using the WordPress Comments Press plugin. In fact, several books in the Digital Humanities have utilized an open peer review process—such as Debates in the Digital Humanities, and Kathleen Fitzpatrick’s recent volume, Generous Thinking—allowing for members of the public to register and provide their own annotations and comments on manuscripts.[iii] One of the nuances in open peer review, as it’s discussed in regards to scholarly communication, is that of the differences between the STEM disciplines and the social sciences, arts, and humanities. Peer review in STEM disciplines is frequently used as a “rigor” checker. Is the method sound? Do the data support the conclusions? Is the study reproducible? Arguably, social sciences, arts, and humanities research is more nuanced, and peer review in these disciplines takes on a slightly different role. As such, it is difficult to define what open peer review could and might do in these different arenas. With peer review being more straightforward in STEM, it makes sense that there are more implementations of and experimentation with it in those disciplines. Just as some view open access as a way to “democratize” scholarly publishing, many see open peer review as affording similar opportunities. With open peer review we can shorten timelines between manuscript submission and publication, hold reviewers accountable for their work, make more apparent the hidden labor of reviewing and editing, allow for collaborative discourse between authors and reviewers, and more. Some of these arguments are deterministic, just as arguments regarding OA being the great democratizer of journal publishing are. In fact, anything open is highly nuanced and contextual. Ultimately, when we discuss “open” we must discuss the stories around it. To what aim? What are the pitfalls? What are the gains? And are we trying to simply replicate a broken system instead of reinvent it? In LIS conversations regarding open peer review are nascent. While In the Library with the Lead Pipe has used an open peer review process since its formation in 2008, there remain few LIS journals implementing an open process.[iv] Journal of Radical Librarianship offers authors the opportunity to opt-in to open peer review.[v] An initial proposal I wrote with my friend and Lead Pipe colleague, Kim Leeder, asking the editorial board of College & Research Libraries to consider open peer review was rejected at ALA Annual 2013. Only recently did C&RL pursue an experiment with open peer review.[vi] With so few opportunities for folks in LIS to experience open peer review, it remains mysterious to us and we have few stories to share. What we do have in our field, as I discovered during my research process, is a curiosity and a desire to better understand open peer review.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Print Journalism's Framing of Female Candidates in The
    Joining the World of Journals Welcome to the nation’s first and, to our knowledge, only undergraduate research journal in communi- cations. We discovered this fact while perusing the Web site of the Council on Undergraduate Research, which lists and links to the 60 or so undergraduate research journals nationwide (http://www.cur.org/ugjournal. html). Some of these journals focus on a discipline (e.g., Journal of Undergraduate Research in Physics), some are university-based and multidisciplinary (e.g., MIT Undergraduate Research Journal), and some are university-based and disciplinary (e.g., Furman University Electronic Journal in Undergraduate Mathematics). The Elon Journal is the first to focus on undergraduate research in journalism, media and communi- cations. The School of Communications at Elon University is the creator and publisher of the online journal. The second issue was published in Fall 2010 under the editorship of Dr. Byung Lee, associate professor in the School of Communications. The three purposes of the journal are: • To publish the best undergraduate research in Elon’s School of Communications each term, • To serve as a repository for quality work to benefit future students seeking models for how to do undergraduate research well, and • To advance the university’s priority to emphasize undergraduate student research. The Elon Journal is published twice a year, with spring and fall issues. Articles and other materials in the journal may be freely downloaded, reproduced and redistributed without permission as long as the author and source are properly cited. Student authors retain copyright own- ership of their works. Celebrating Student Research This journal reflects what we enjoy seeing in our students -- intellectual maturing.
    [Show full text]
  • Electronic Democracy the World of Political Science— the Development of the Discipline
    Electronic Democracy The World of Political Science— The development of the discipline Book series edited by Michael Stein and John Trent Professors Michael B. Stein and John E. Trent are the co-editors of the book series “The World of Political Science”. The former is visiting professor of Political Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada and Emeritus Professor, McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. The latter is a Fellow in the Center of Governance of the University of Ottawa, in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, and a former professor in its Department of Political Science. Norbert Kersting (ed.) Electronic Democracy Barbara Budrich Publishers Opladen • Berlin • Toronto 2012 An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libraries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high quality books Open Access for the public good. The Open Access ISBN for this book is 978-3-86649-546-3. More information about the initiative and links to the Open Access version can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org © 2012 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0. (CC- BY-SA 4.0) It permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you share under the same license, give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ © 2012 Dieses Werk ist beim Verlag Barbara Budrich GmbH erschienen und steht unter der Creative Commons Lizenz Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0): https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ Diese Lizenz erlaubt die Verbreitung, Speicherung, Vervielfältigung und Bearbeitung bei Verwendung der gleichen CC-BY-SA 4.0-Lizenz und unter Angabe der UrheberInnen, Rechte, Änderungen und verwendeten Lizenz.
    [Show full text]
  • Back to Basics: What Is the E-Journal?
    This is a repository copy of Back to basics: what is the e-journal?. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/29/ Article: Cole, Louise (Submitted: 2004) Back to basics: what is the e-journal? The Serials Librarian, 47 (1/2). ISSN 0361-526X https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v47n01_05 Reuse See Attached Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ 1 Back to basics: what is the e-journal? As we move further into the first decade of a new century, it seems a good point to reflect on where the e-journal has come from, the position it is at now, and where it might be going in the immediate and long-term future. My concern within this article is to look backwards and forwards and consider this revolution in serials publishing, and the impact it has had on different user groups from the traditional academic audience to the general internet-savvy population. This article will therefore be structured in the following way: first, I will be looking at the birth of the e-journal, and the development of technologies through the last twenty years which influenced it; then move on to consider popular models of electronic serial publishing; to consider whether ‘born digital’ content is really in the long-term an advantage; to discuss the impact of new publishing models; and finally to look at where the e-journal fits as a source for support, and an outlet, for scholarly research.
    [Show full text]
  • “I Am a Youtuber” a Netnographic Approach to Profiling Teen Use of Youtube
    “I am a YouTuber” A netnographic approach to profiling teen use of YouTube by Sun Hee Jang B.Comp(IS); GradCertEd(TESOL); MEd Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Tasmania Australia November 2015 DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY I, Sun Hee Jang, am the author of the thesis entitled “I am a YouTuber: a netnographic approach to profiling teen use of YouTube”, submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. I declare that the material is original, and to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due acknowledgement is made in the text of the thesis, nor does the thesis contain any material that infringes copyright. The thesis contains no material which has been accepted for a degree or diploma by the University or any other institution. Sun Hee Jang Date: 16 November 2015 i STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY OF ACCESS I, Sun Hee Jang, author of the thesis entitled “I am a YouTuber: a netnographic approach to profiling teen use of YouTube”, submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, agree that this thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying and communication in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Sun Hee Jang Date: 16 November 2015 ii STATEMENT REGARDING PUBLISHED WORK CONTAINED IN THESIS The Publishers of the paper comprising Chapter 1 and 3 hold the copyright for that content, and access to the material should be sought from the respective publisher. The remaining non published content of the thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying and communication in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968.
    [Show full text]
  • Nber Working Paper Series Open Access As a Crude
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES OPEN ACCESS AS A CRUDE SOLUTION TO A HOLD-UP PROBLEM IN THE TWO-SIDED MARKET FOR ACADEMIC JOURNALS Mark J. McCabe Christopher M. Snyder Working Paper 22220 http://www.nber.org/papers/w22220 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 May 2016 We thank Mark Armstrong, Sumit Joshi, Simon Loertscher, David Malueg, Lars Stole, and seminar participants at American University, Dartmouth College, George Washington University, MIT, New York University, Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum, Santa Clara University, Tulane University, the University of Chicago, the University of Goettingen, Yale University, the Cologne Summit on Open Access Publishing, the Emory University Symposium on Open Access and Digital Preservation, the International Industrial Organization Conference (Chicago), and the NBER Workshop on Scholarly Communication, Open Science, and Its Impact (Cambridge, MA) for helpful comments. This paper grew out of an earlier project, "The Economics of Open-Access Journals," conducted under grants from the Open Society Institute, NET Institute, and Stigler Center for Study of Economy and State at the University of Chicago Graduate School of Business. Funding for work on this paper was provided by the Sloan Foundation, grant #G-2012-10-20, which the authors gratefully acknowledge. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2016 by Mark J.
    [Show full text]
  • ACA, Wiley Journals MEMBER and AUTHOR Frequently Asked Questions
    ACA, Wiley Journals MEMBER AND AUTHOR Frequently Asked Questions Wiley handles the subscription management, electronic access, and printing of the 10 journals listed below and the subscription management of Counseling Today. ACA JOURNALS/DIVISIONS INCLUDED IN PARTNERSHIP ADULTSPAN Journal (AADA) Journal of College Counseling (ACCA) The Career Development Quarterly (NCDA) Journal of Counseling & Development (ACA) Counseling and Values (ASERVIC) Journal of Employment Counseling (NECA) Counselor Education and Supervision (ACES) The Journal of Humanistic Counseling (AHC) Journal of Addictions & Offender Counseling (IAAOC) Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development (AMCD) MEMBER BENEFITS • All journals listed above are available online to current ACA and division members through the Wiley Online Library. • Journal content is digitized back to Volume 1, Issue 1, for each of the 10 journals. Current ACA and division members have FREE electronic access to the journal(s) they receive now—as well as the digital archive. • ACA members receive a 25% discount on Wiley books. The discount is available online at Wiley.com and the promotion code is SD109. Note: This is an ACA-only membership benefit and this code should not be shared with others. ELECTRONIC ACCESS Q: How can I gain electronic access to the journal(s) I currently receive? A: Log into the ACA website, click on the Publications page and then “Electronic Journal Access” in the drop down menu, which will link to your journal(s) in the Wiley Online Library. You must log into the ACA website each time you wish to access your journal(s). Q: How can I set up an e-mail alert to make sure I am notified when each new issue is published? 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Electronic Journal and Its Implications for the Electronic Library
    The Electronic journal and its implications for the digital library Item Type Book Chapter Authors McKnight, Cliff; Dillon, Andrew; Shackel, Brian Citation The Electronic journal and its implications for the digital library 1996, :351-368 Computer Networking and Scholarly Communication in the 21st Century Publisher New York: SUNY Press (SUNY Series in Computer-Mediated Communication) Journal Computer Networking and Scholarly Communication in the 21st Century Download date 27/09/2021 00:25:20 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/105169 THE ELECTRONIC JOURNAL AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR THE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY Cliff McKnight(1), Andrew Dillon(2) and Brian Shackel(3) (1) Department of Information and Library Studies, Loughborough University of Technology (2) School of Library and Information Science, Indiana University (3) HUSAT Research Institute, Loughborough University of Technology This item is not the definitive copy. Please use the following citation when referencing this material: McKnight, C., Dillon, A. and Shackel, B. (1996) The electronic journal and its implications for the digital library. In: T. Harrison and T. Stephens (eds.) Computer Networking and Scholarly Communication in the 21st Century. NY: SUNY Press, 351- 368. 1. INTRODUCTION It is now over ten years since the first electronic journal experiments (e.g., EIES, BLEND) and the intervening years have not seen researchers being idle in this field. Indeed, while experiments have continued apace in an attempt to answer various questions such as the appropriateness of particular interfaces, electronic journals have continued to appear. The third edition of the ARL list (Okerson, 1993) contains 45 electronic journals while the first edition, only two years earlier (Okerson, 1991), listed only 27.
    [Show full text]
  • Don Quixote: High Art Or Kitsch?
    laberinto An Electronic Journal of Early Modern Hispanic Literatures and Cultures Special Issue: Cervantes In His 400th Anniversary In China vOlUmE 10, 2017 LABERINTO JOURNAL 10 (2017) EDITORS Juan Pablo Gil-Osle Arizona State University Daniel Holcombe Clemson University EDITOR ASSISTANT María José Domínguez Arizona State University EDITORIAL BOARD Frederick de Armas Barbara Simerka Christopher Weimer Bruce R. Burningham Marina Brownlee Enrique García Santo-Tomás Steven Wagschal Julio Vélez-Sainz Lisa Voigt Laberinto is sponsored by the Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies (ACMRS), affiliated with the Spanish Section at the School of International Letters and Cultures (SILC), Arizona State University, and published in Tempe, Arizona. www.laberintojournal.com https://acmrs.org/publications/journals/laberinto/about Arizona Board of Regents © Table of Contents Articles and Talks Why Cervantes in China?: Hyperreality and Cevantine Cultural encounters in Beijing 2016 (Tang Xianzu, Shakespeare, Cervantes, and Borges) Juan Pablo Gil-Osle, Arizona State University…………………….3 Salvador Dalí’s Don Quixote: High Art or Kitsch? William Daniel Holcombe, Clemson University…………………13 Mammoth Woolly Migrations: Transhumance, Extinction, and the Cervantine Shepherd Margaret Marek, Illinois College…………………………………27 Transcendental metagenre travelers: a background of the reception of Cervantes’ Don Quixote in Spain and France Vicente Pérez de León, University of Glasgow Véronique Duché, University of Melbourne……………………53 “ . And things that go
    [Show full text]
  • Converting Scholarly Journals to Open Access: a Review of Approaches and Experiences David J
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc. Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln 2016 Converting Scholarly Journals to Open Access: A Review of Approaches and Experiences David J. Solomon Michigan State University Mikael Laakso Hanken School of Economics Bo-Christer Björk Hanken School of Economics Peter Suber editor Harvard University Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scholcom Part of the Intellectual Property Law Commons, Scholarly Communication Commons, and the Scholarly Publishing Commons Solomon, David J.; Laakso, Mikael; Björk, Bo-Christer; and Suber, Peter editor, "Converting Scholarly Journals to Open Access: A Review of Approaches and Experiences" (2016). Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc.. 27. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scholcom/27 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc. by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Converting Scholarly Journals to Open Access: A Review of Approaches and Experiences By David J. Solomon, Mikael Laakso, and Bo-Christer Björk With interpolated comments from the public and a panel of experts Edited by Peter Suber Published by the Harvard Library August 2016 This entire report, including the main text by David Solomon, Bo-Christer Björk, and Mikael Laakso, the preface by Peter Suber, and the comments by multiple authors is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 1 Preface Subscription journals have been converting or “flipping” to open access (OA) for about as long as OA has been an option.
    [Show full text]
  • Key Issues for E-Resource Collection Development: a Guide for Libraries
    Key Issues for E-Resource Collection Development: A Guide for Libraries By Sharon Johnson, with Ole Gunnar Evensen, Julia Gelfand, Glenda Lammers, Lynn Sipe and Nadia Zilper Edited by members of the Acquisition and Collection Development Committee, including Jérôme Fronty, Joseph Hafner, Judy Mansfield and Regine Schmolling. Acquisition and Collection Development Section August, 2012 ©Copyright in this document belongs to IFLA. Content is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License which means you are free to copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work provided that any use is made with attribution to IFLA. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/. For additional information, please contact IFLA headquarters. Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 3 Purpose .................................................................................................................... 3 History ...................................................................................................................... 4 Scope ....................................................................................................................... 4 Authors ..................................................................................................................... 4 1.0 Collection policy statement (for internal use by staff) ...........................................
    [Show full text]
  • INFORMAL DIGITAL LEARNING of ENGLISH: the CASE of KOREAN UNIVERSITY STUDENTS by JU SEONG LEE DISSERTATION Submitted in Partial F
    INFORMAL DIGITAL LEARNING OF ENGLISH: THE CASE OF KOREAN UNIVERSITY STUDENTS BY JU SEONG LEE DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Curriculum and Instruction in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2018 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Professor Mark Dressman, Chair Associate Professor Randall Sadler Associate Professor Patrick Smith Assistant Professor Eunjung Grace Oh ABSTRACT With a changing ecological environment of second language (L2) learning and teaching, as well as its huge potential for out-of-class L2 learning, an increasing number of Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) and Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) researchers and practitioners have become interested in ‘informal digital learning of English (IDLE)’ in various English as a foreign language (EFL) contexts. To date, however, it is still inconclusive whether or to what extent the quantity (frequency) and quality (diversity) of IDLE activities used by EFL students can contribute to English learning outcomes. Further, research on factors that influence the learners’ Willingness To Communicate (WTC) when engaging in IDLE activities has yet to be fully clarified by empirical research with L2 learners in EFL contexts. To address these research gaps, data were collected using mixed methods through a questionnaire, semi-structured interview and English learning outcomes from 77 Korean university students enrolled in 15 different EFL classes of three separate universities. This study found four key results: First, contrary to earlier findings, this study found that quantity of IDLE was not related to vocabulary scores. It suggested that the quality of IDLE was significantly, positively associated with vocabulary outcomes.
    [Show full text]
  • Cost Effectiveness of Open Access Publications
    University of California, Santa Barbara From the SelectedWorks of Ted C Bergstrom October 2014 COST EFFECTIVENESS OF OPEN ACCESS PUBLICATIONS Contact Start Your Own Notify Me Author SelectedWorks of New Work Available at: http://works.bepress.com/ted_bergstrom/122 COST EFFECTIVENESS OF OPEN ACCESS PUBLICATIONS JEVIN D. WEST, THEODORE BERGSTROM and CARL T. BERGSTROM∗ Open access publishing has been proposed as one possible solution to the serials crisis—the rapidly growing subscription prices in scholarly journal publishing. How- ever, open access publishing can present economic pitfalls as well, such as excessive article processing charges. We discuss the decision that an author faces when choos- ing to submit to an open access journal. We develop an interactive tool to help authors compare among alternative open access venues and thereby get the most for their article processing charges. (JEL I2, C1, A1) I. INTRODUCTION author-pay model is not without its own pricing perils. Some commercial publishers levy article Institutional subscription prices of academic processing charges as high as $3,000 for pub- journals continue to increase more rapidly than lishing a single article. A number of “preda- library budgets (Kyrillidou 2012). Journals tory” open access publishers operate like van- produced by for-profit publishers typically ity presses, charging authors substantial fees in cost libraries about three times as much as exchange for the thinnest veneer of editorial over- comparable journals produced by nonprofit pub- sight (Beall 2012; 2014). lishers (Bergstrom and Bergstrom 2004a, 2006; On the positive side, the structure of the Bergstrom and McAfee 2013). As a result, library market for open access publications offers the budgets are badly strained while for-profit pub- potential for a more competitive marketplace lishers are able to extract large profits from the than that for subscription-based publication university community.
    [Show full text]