Rubens's Theory and Practice of the Imitation of Art Author(s): Jeffrey M. Muller Source: The Art Bulletin , Jun., 1982, Vol. 64, No. 2 (Jun., 1982), pp. 229-247 Published by: CAA Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3050218 JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact
[email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms CAA is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Art Bulletin This content downloaded from 94.71.154.90 on Mon, 01 Feb 2021 11:33:27 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms Rubens's Theory and Practice of the Imitation of Art Jeffrey M. Muller Only recently has it been suggested that Rubens informed collector, I was led to question this body of evidence for an his art with theory. Muller Hofstede has proposed to see explanation of the painter's stance towards the art of the Rubens's work in light of the principle "ut pictura poesis" past. The present article therefore considers in depth one as outlined by Lee.' Both Muiller Hofstede and Winner theoretical point: the problem of artistic imitation in have recognized the artist's method of juxtaposing chosen Rubens's thought and practice.