<<

ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION

Predictors of Cardiac Events After Major Vascular Role of Clinical Characteristics, Dobutamine Echocardiography, and ␤-Blocker

Eric Boersma, PhD Context Patients who undergo major vascular surgery are at increased risk of peri- Don Poldermans, MD, PhD operative cardiac complications. High-risk patients can be identified by clinical factors and noninvasive cardiac testing, such as dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE); Jeroen J. Bax, MD, PhD however, such noninvasive imaging techniques carry significant disadvantages. A re- Ewout W. Steyerberg, MD, PhD cent study found that perioperative ␤-blocker therapy reduces complication rates in Ian R. Thomson, MD high-risk individuals. Objective To examine the relationship of clinical characteristics, DSE results, ␤-blocker Jan D. Banga, MD, PhD therapy, and cardiac events in patients undergoing major vascular surgery. Louis L. M. van de Ven, MD, PhD Design and Setting Cohort study conducted in 1996-1999 in the following 8 cen- Hero van Urk, MD, PhD ters: Erasmus Medical Centre and Sint Clara Ziekenhuis, Rotterdam, Twee Steden Ziek- enhuis, Tilburg, Academisch Ziekenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, and Medisch Centrum Alkmaar, Jos R. T. C. Roelandt, MD, PhD Alkmaar, the Netherlands; Ziekenhuis Middelheim, Antwerp, Belgium; and San Gerardo for the DECREASE Study Group , Monza, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy. ATIENTS WITH SEVERE PERIPH- Patients A total of 1351 consecutive patients scheduled for major vascular surgery; eral frequently ␤ have underlying coronary DSE was performed in 1097 patients (81%), and 360 (27%) received -blocker therapy. disease. Hence, patients under- Main Outcome Measure Cardiac death or nonfatal myocardial infarction within 30 ␤ Pgoing major vascular surgery are at days after surgery, compared by clinical characteristics, DSE results, and -blocker use. increased risk for cardiac complications Results Forty-five patients (3.3%) had perioperative cardiac death or nonfatal myo- during or shortly after surgery. Appro- cardial infarction. In multivariable analysis, important clinical determinants of adverse out- priate patient management then includes come were age 70 years or older; current or prior angina pectoris; and prior myocardial assessment of the perioperative cardiac infarction, heart failure, or cerebrovascular accident. Eighty-three percent of patients had less than 3 clinical risk factors. Among this subgroup, patients receiving ␤-blockers had a risk, as well as strategies to reduce this lower risk of cardiac complications (0.8% [2/263]) than those not receiving ␤-blockers risk. Several investigations demon- (2.3% [20/855]), and DSE had minimal additional prognostic value. In patients with 3 or strated the utility of dobutamine stress more risk factors (17%), DSE provided additional prognostic information, for patients with- echocardiography (DSE) for preopera- out stress-induced had much lower risk of events than those with stress- tive cardiac risk assessment.1-5 Patients induced ischemia (among those receiving ␤-blockers, 2.0% [1/50] vs 10.6% [5/47]). More- with stress-induced new wall-motion over, patients with limited stress-induced ischemia (1-4 segments) experienced fewer cardiac abnormalities (NWMAs), a hallmark of events (2.8% [1/36]) than those with more extensive ischemia (Ն5 segments, 36% [4/11]). myocardial ischemia, are at an 8% to 38% Conclusion The additional predictive value of DSE is limited in clinically low-risk pa- risk of cardiac death or myocardial infarc- tients receiving ␤-blockers. In clinical practice, DSE may be avoided in a large number of tion (MI) within 30 days after sur- patients who can proceed safely for surgery without delay. In clinically intermediate- and ␤ gery.2,4,6,7 In contrast, patients without high-risk patients receiving -blockers, DSE may help identify those in whom surgery can NWMAs have much lower complica- still be performed and those in whom cardiac should be considered. tion rates: in the range of 0% to 5%. There JAMA. 2001;285:1865-1873 www.jama.com are, however, significant disadvantages Author Affiliations are listed at the end of this article. Group. The effect of bisoprolol on perioperative mor- associated with the routine use of DSE Members of the Dutch Echocardiographic Cardiac Risk tality and myocardial infarction in high-risk patients (or other noninvasive imaging tech- Evaluation Applying Stress Echocardiography group undergoing vascular surgery. N Engl J Med. 1999; are listed in Poldermans D, Boersma E, Bax JJ, et al, 341:1789-1794. niques) in all vascular surgery candi- for the Dutch Echocardiographic Cardiac Risk Evalu- Corresponding Author information is at the end of the dates. These include the substantial costs ation Applying Stress Echocardiography Study article.

©2001 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. (Reprinted) JAMA, April 11, 2001—Vol 285, No. 14 1865

Downloaded from www.jama.com at Johns Hopkins University, on October 28, 2005 ␤-BLOCKER THERAPY INFLUENCE of the test, and, more importantly, the forty-five additional patients under- verse events committee adjudicated all risk of delaying surgery in patients with went DSE at the discretion of the treat- end points. Deaths were considered to large aortic or critical limb ing , based on other risk fac- be cardiac related unless there was ex- ischemia. The recent Dutch Echo- tors (eg, hyperlipidemia and smoking). plicit evidence for a noncardiac cause. cardiographic Cardiac Risk Evaluation Thus, in total 1091 patients (81%) un- Myocardial infarction was defined by Applying Stress Echocardiography derwent DSE. Perioperative ␤-blockers either a serum creatine kinase level of (DECREASE) study demonstrated that were administered to 360 patients more than 110 U/L with a myoglobin perioperative ␤-adrenergic blockade with (27%): 301 (22%) of the 1351 patients isoenzyme fraction of more than 10%, bisoprolol reduces the risk of 30-day were treated long-term with ␤-block- or by new Q waves faster than 30 mil- complications in patients with NWMAs ers, and 59 (5%) were randomized to re- liseconds in duration on the 12-lead to a risk level as observed in patients with- ceive ␤-blockers within the framework electrocardiogram. out NWMAs.8,9 This finding raises the of the DECREASE study. Eight pa- question of whether DSE is indicated in tients who had extensive resting and/or Data Analysis all patients scheduled for vascular stress-induced ischemia were ex- Univariable and multivariable logistic surgery. Does simple perioperative cluded from the DECREASE study. Four regression analyses were applied to administration of ␤-blockers reduce or of these underwent coronary artery by- evaluate the relations between a lim- eliminate the need for noninvasive pre- pass graft surgery, and 2 of them died ited number of baseline clinical char- operative cardiac testing?10 On the other during this operation. The 2 surviving acteristics, DSE results, ␤-blocker hand, in some patients the cardiopro- patients subsequently underwent un- therapy, and the composite end points tective effect of ␤-blockers may be insuf- eventful vascular surgery with periop- as outlined above. All variables that ficient to effectively reduce periopera- erative ␤-blocker administration for car- reached a P value Ͻ.50 in univariable tive cardiac events. These patients may diac protection. The other 4 patients analysis entered the multivariable stage. benefit from additional coronary revas- underwent vascular surgery without Multivariable models were con- cularization. To address these issues prior myocardial revascularization structed by backward deletion of the we studied the relationship between clini- and received ␤-blockers for cardiac least significant characteristics, apply- cal characteristics, DSE results, ␤-block- protection. None of the other non- ing the Akaike optimal information cri- ers, and adverse cardiac outcome in DECREASE patients received ␤-block- terion.12,13 Special attention was paid to a large series of consecutive patients ers for cardiac protection. the extent to which DSE results and scheduled to undergo major vascular ␤-blocker therapy contributed to the surgery. Dobutamine Stress prognostic information obtained from Echocardiography clinical characteristics alone. Odds ra- METHODS Dobutamine stress echocardiography tios (ORs) and corresponding 95% con- Patients was performed according to a stan- fidence intervals (CIs) are reported. The study population consisted of 1351 dard protocol.11 The left ventricle was Despite the fact that the population consecutive patients scheduled for divided into 16 segments and wall mo- consisted of patients undergoing high- elective major vascular surgery who tion was scored on a 5-point ordinal risk surgery, the number of outcome were screened for eligibility for the scale (1, normal wall motion; 2, mild events appeared to be limited. There- DECREASE study at 8 of the following hypokinesis; 3, severe hypokinesis; 4, fore, there was a serious concern that participating centers: Erasmus Medical akinesis; and 5, dyskinesis). The re- model overfitting would occur. To over- Centre and Sint Clara Ziekenhuis, Rot- sults of DSE were considered positive come this, we limited the number of terdam, Twee Steden Ziekenhuis, Til- if new wall-motion abnormalities candidate clinical variables to be in- burg, Academisch Ziekenhuis Utrecht, (NWMAs) occurred (ie, if wall mo- cluded in the model, whereby, particu- Utrecht, and Medisch Centrum Alk- tion in any segment worsened by Ն1 larly, the results of prior risk model- maar, Alkmaar, the Netherlands; Ziek- more grades during the test, with the ing analyses in surgical patients were enhuis Middelheim, Antwerp, Bel- exception of akinesis becoming considered.14-17 Furthermore, we ap- gium; and San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, dyskinesis). The extent and location of plied a clinical risk model that was de- Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere ischemia were evaluated and a wall- veloped elsewhere to our data set, and Scientifico, San Giovanni Rotondo, motion index was calculated, both at collapsed the clinical risk assessment Italy.8 Per protocol, 846 patients with at rest and during peak stress. into 1 index variable. Subsequently, the least 1 of the following risk factors un- prognostic value of this risk index and derwent DSE: age 70 years or older, an- End Point Definition the additional and additive prognostic gina, prior MI, congestive heart failure, The study end point was a composite value of DSE results and ␤-blocker treatment for ventricular arrhythmias, of cardiac death or nonfatal MI (MI) oc- therapy were analyzed by logistic re- treatment for diabetes mellitus, or lim- curring during the period from screen- gression analyses. We chose the risk in- ited exercise capacity. Two hundred ing until 30 days after surgery. An ad- dex that was recently developed by Lee

1866 JAMA, April 11, 2001—Vol 285, No. 14 (Reprinted) ©2001 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Downloaded from www.jama.com at Johns Hopkins University, on October 28, 2005 ␤-BLOCKER THERAPY INFLUENCE and colleagues17 in a data set of 4315 were not receiving ␤-blockers. There medications had higher event rates than patients undergoing major noncar- were 45 perioperative cardiac compli- patients not taking such medication; sta- diac surgery, including 898 patients un- cations (3.3%): 31 patients had car- tistical significance was observed for ni- dergoing vascular surgery. To com- diac death and another 14 nonfatal MI. trates and angiotensin-converting en- pose the Lee risk index, 1 point is zyme (ACE) inhibitors. There was no assigned to each of the following char- Univariable Models relationship between the type of sur- acteristics: high-risk type of surgery, In univariable analysis, a history of heart gery and the composite end point. known ischemic heart disease, a his- failure was the most significant deter- Patients who did not undergo DSE tory of congestive heart failure, a his- minant of adverse cardiac outcome (ie, patients without clinical cardiac risk tory of , diabe- among the clinical variables examined factors) and those without NWMAs tes mellitus, and renal failure. (TABLE 2). The subgroup of patients with during DSE had a significantly lower The performance of the risk models a history of heart failure (5% of the popu- cardiac death or MI rate than patients was determined by the cardiac index, lation) had a more than 5-fold increase with NWMAs during DSE (0.4% and which indicates how well a model rank- in the risk of perioperative cardiac death 1.6% vs 13.5%, respectively (PϽ.001; orders patients with respect to their out- or MI compared with those without such TABLE 3). Thus, NWMAs were strongly comes; the cardiac index ranges from a history. Other important univariable predictive of adverse perioperative car- 0.5 (not predictive at all) to 1.0 (opti- determinants of perioperative cardiac diac outcome. Moreover, the extent of mal performance).18 In addition, the complications were a history of MI, prior stress-induced ischemia also provided Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic for good- cerebrovascular accident (CVA), cur- important prognostic information, as ness of fit is presented. The predictive rent or prior angina pectoris, and age 70 the event rates ranged from 10.8% in accuracy of the models was further years and older. Patients taking cardiac those with NWMAs in 1 to 4 segments evaluated by bootstrapping tech- 19 niques. One hundred bootstrap Table 1. Characteristics of the Population samples were drawn from the original Patients Who Patients Who Did data set (with replacement) and the full Characteristics Used ␤-Blockers* Not Use ␤-Blockers P Value† modeling process, including the step- Patients, No. 360 (100) 991 (100) wise selection, was redone in every Demographics bootstrap sample. The models devel- Age Ն70 years 156 (43) 425 (43) .9 oped in the bootstrap samples were sub- Men 280 (78) 774 (78) .94 History sequently tested in the original data set. Hypertension 209 (59) 374 (39) Ͻ.001 This process provides a factor to cor- Diabetes mellitus 56 (16) 129 (13) .28 rect for a possible overoptimism of the Ventricular arrhythmias 20 (6) 26 (3) .01 20 cardiac index. Current stable angina or prior angina 158 (44) 176 (18) Ͻ.001 Based on the results obtained by the Prior myocardial infarction 210 (59) 281 (29) Ͻ.001 described modeling strategies, a risk Congestive heart failure 27 (8) 44 (5) .04 score was developed to estimate an in- Percutaneous transluminal 33 (9) 26 (3) Ͻ.001 dividual patient’s risk of perioperative coronary cardiac death or MI. Furthermore, a Coronary artery bypass graft surgery 66 (19) 100 (10) Ͻ.001 simple decision-tree is constructed to Prior cerebrovascular accident 39 (11) 78 (8) .1 help the physician decide in which pa- Pulmonary disease 49 (14) 122 (13) .58 tients to refer for noninvasive periop- Renal failure 19 (5) 36 (4) .21 erative cardiac testing. Aortic valve stenosis 14 (4) 25 (3) .2 Long-term cardiac medication RESULTS Aspirin 134 (38) 274 (29) Ͻ.01 Nitrates 94 (27) 113 (12) Ͻ.001 The primary patient characteristics are Calcium antagonists 135 (38) 200 (21) Ͻ.001 ABLE described in T 1. Obviously, pa- Angiotensin-converting 127 (36) 267 (28) Ͻ.01 tients receiving ␤-blockers during sur- enzyme inhibitors gery had a risk profile that was worse Lipid-lowering agents 120 (34) 166 (18) Ͻ.001 than that of patients not taking such Scheduled type of surgery medication because they had higher rate Infrainguinal reconstruction 125 (35) 338 (34) of hypertension, ventricular arrhyth- Tube prosthesis 69 (19) 179 (18) .83 mias, and history of coronary disease. Aortic-femoral bypass graft 166 (46) 474 (48) *␤-blocker therapy included long-term users (n = 301) and patients randomized to bisoprolol as part of the Dutch Echo- Furthermore, patients receiving cardiographic Cardiac Risk Evaluation Applying Stress Echocardiography (DECREASE) study (n = 59). All data are ␤-blockers more frequently used other presented as number (percentage) unless otherwise indicated. †Fisher exact 2-sided test. cardiac medications than those who

©2001 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. (Reprinted) JAMA, April 11, 2001—Vol 285, No. 14 1867

Downloaded from www.jama.com at Johns Hopkins University, on October 28, 2005 ␤-BLOCKER THERAPY INFLUENCE

Table 2. Univariable Relation Between Clinical Baseline Characteristics and Perioperative Cardiac Death or Myocardial Infarction (N = 1351)* Cardiac Death or Odds Ratio ␹2 Variables No. of Patients Myocardial Infarction, No. (%) (95% Confidence Interval) Test P Value Demographics Age, y Ն70 581 27 (4.7) 2.0 (1.1-3.7) 5.3 .02 Ͻ70 770 18 (2.3) 1.00 Sex Men 1054 36 (3.4) 1.1 (0.5-2.4) 0.1 .74 Women 297 9 (3.0) 1.0 History Congestive heart failure Yes 71 10 (14.1) 5.7 (2.7-12.1) 20.8 Ͻ.001 No 1255 35 (2.8) 1.0 Prior myocardial infarction Yes 491 30 (6.1) 3.6 (1.9-6.8) 15.9 Ͻ.001 No 846 15 (1.8) 1.0 Prior cerebrovascular accident Yes 117 12 (10.3) 4.1 (2.0-8.1) 15.9 Ͻ.001 No 1209 33 (2.7) 1.0 Current stable angina or prior angina Yes 334 23 (6.9) 3.3 (1.8-6.0) 15.2 Ͻ.001 No 998 22 (2.2) 4.1 (2.0-8.1) 15.9 Ͻ.001 Diabetes mellitus Yes 185 11 (6.0) 2.1 (1.0-4.2) 4.2 .04 No 1149 34 (3.0) 1.0 Renal failure Yes 55 4 (7.3) 2.4 (0.8-6.9) 2.5 .11 No 1280 41 (3.2) 1.0 stenosis Yes 39 3 (7.7) 2.5 (0.8-8.6) 2.3 .13 No 1292 41 (3.2) 1.0 Pulmonary disease Yes 171 9 (5.3) 1.7 (0.8-3.6) 2.0 .15 No 1153 36 (3.1) 1.0 Ventricular arrhythmias Yes 46 3 (6.5) 2.1 (0.6-6.9) 1.4 .24 No 1279 42 (3.3) 1.0 Coronary artery bypass graft surgery Yes 166 8 (4.8) 1.5 (0.7-3.4) 1.2 .28 No 1159 37 (3.2) 1.0 Hypertension Yes 583 23 (3.9) 1.3 (0.7-2.4) 0.9 .34 No 737 22 (3.0) 1.0 Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty Yes 59 1 (1.7) 0.5 (0.1-3.5) 0.5 .47 No 1261 44 (3.5) 1.0 Long-term Cardiac Medication Nitrates Yes 207 18 (8.7) 3.9 (2.1-7.2) 18.3 Ͻ.001 No 1083 26 (2.4) 1.0 Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors Yes 394 20 (5.1) 1.9 (1.0-3.5) 4.4 .04 No 911 25 (2.7) 1.0 Calcium antagonists Yes 335 15 (4.5) 1.5 (0.8-2.8) 1.6 .21 No 962 29 (3.0) 1.0 Aspirin Yes 408 17 (4.2) 1.4 (0.7-2.5) 1.0 .32 No 879 27 (3.1) 1.0 Lipid-lowering agents Yes 286 11 (3.8) 1.1 (0.6-2.3) 0.1 .72 No 997 34 (3.4) 1.0 Scheduled Type of Surgery Infrainguinal reconstruction 463 15 (3.2) 0.9 (0.5-1.9) 0.0 .86 Tube prosthesis 248 8 (3.2) 0.9 (0.4-2.3) 0.0 .88 Aortic-femoral bypass graft 640 22 (3.4) 1.0 *Numbers may not add to 1351 due to missing data.

1868 JAMA, April 11, 2001—Vol 285, No. 14 (Reprinted) ©2001 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Downloaded from www.jama.com at Johns Hopkins University, on October 28, 2005 ␤-BLOCKER THERAPY INFLUENCE to 23.9% in patients with NWMAs in egories (homogeneity test for ORs, ␤-blocker therapy was again associated 5 or more segments. The echocardio- P=.69), so that the crude OR is best es- with a significantly reduced risk of the gram at rest also provided prognostic timated by the method of Mantel- composite end point. The protective ef- information. Patients with 5 or more ab- Haenszel test (0.1; 95% CI, 0.1-0.3). fect of ␤-blocker therapy was observed normal segments had a 4- to 6-fold in- in long-term users (OR, 0.1; 95% CI, 0.0- creased risk of cardiac complications Multivariable Models 0.3) as well as in patients who received compared with those with a normal or Many of the univariably significant clini- bisoprolol as part of the DECREASE slightly aberrant (1-4 abnormal seg- cal determinants of cardiac outcome re- study (OR, 0.1; 95% CI, 0.0-0.4). ments) wall motion at rest. mained important in the multivariable Despite their overall risk profile be- analysis (TABLE 4). After correcting for Application of the Lee Risk Index ing worse (Table 1), patients receiving other determinants, prior CVA showed In all, 611 patients (45%) had a Lee risk ␤-blockers during surgery had a signifi- the strongest relationship with periop- index of 1, 509 (38%) had an index of cantly reduced risk of cardiac death or erative cardiac complications. A his- 2, and 231 (17%) had an index of 3 or MI compared with those not taking such tory of heart failure and prior MI were more points (note that all patients un- medication. Among the 254 patients the next strongest clinical predictors. An- derwent high-risk surgery, and thus had who did not undergo DSE, no periop- gina and age 70 years or more were also a risk index Ն1 points). The inci- erative cardiac complications were ob- important. After correcting for differ- dence of the composite end point in served in the 8.7% of patients receiving ences in clinical characteristics, pa- these patients was 1.3%, 3.1%, and 9.1% ␤-blockers, whereas there was 1 event tients receiving ␤-blockers were still at (PϽ.001). Regression analysis re- (0.4%) in the remaining patients. In the significantly lower risk for the compos- vealed a crude OR of 2.3 for the com- 875 patients without stress-induced ite end point than those who were not posite end point associated with a NWMAs, 22% were receiving ␤-block- (adjusted OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1-0.7). 1-point increase in the risk index (95% ers. One cardiac complication (0.5%) oc- When clinical data were combined CI, 1.8-3.1). Multivariable analyses curred in this group, and there were 13 with DSE results, advanced age, angina again demonstrated the additional and (1.9%) in those not receiving ␤-block- pectoris, prior MI, and prior heart fail- additive prognostic value of DSE re- ers. Finally, in the 222 patients with ure lost most of their predictive power sults and ␤-blocker therapy (TABLE 5). NWMAs, 67% of those receiving with respect to the composite end point. ␤-blockers with 4.7% having a periop- In fact, DSE results (especially the pres- Predictive Accuracy erative cardiac event vs 31.5% among ence or absence of NWMAs) were the The cardiac index for the composite end those not receiving ␤-blockers. There most important determinants of periop- point model based on clinical character- was no evidence of a differential effect erative cardiac outcome. In connection istics only was 0.78, reflecting good abil- of ␤-blocker therapy in these patient cat- with both clinical data and DSE results, ity to discriminate between patients who

Table 3. Univariable Relation Between Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography Results and Perioperative Cardiac Death or Myocardial Infarction* Cardiac Death or Odds Ratio Variables No. of Patients Myocardial Infarction, No. (%) (95% Confidence Interval) ␹2 P Value DSE summary New wall-motion abnormalities 222 30 (13.5) 39.5 (5.3-292) 13.0 Ͻ.001 No new wall-motion abnormalities 875 14 (1.6) 4.1 (0.5-8.1) 1.9 .17 No DSE 254 1 (0.4) 1.0 Segments with new wall-motion abnormalities, No.† Ն5 46 11 (23.9) 19.3 (8.2-45.6) 45.7 Ͻ.001 1-4 176 19 (10.8) 7.4 (3.7-15.2) 30.6 Ͻ.001 0 875 14 (1.6) 1.0 Abnormal segments at rest, No.† Ն5 305 29 (9.5) 5.8 (2.8-12.2) 22.3 Ͻ.001 1-4 226 5 (2.2) 1.3 (0.4-3.7) 0.2 .68 0 566 10 (1.8) 1.0 ST-segment changes during test† Yes 233 20 (8.6) 3.7 (1.9-6.9) 16.2 Ͻ.001 No 839 21 (2.5) 1.0 Angina during test† Yes 100 10 (10.0) 3.3 (1.6-7.0) 10.0 .002 No 986 32 (3.2) 1.0 *Numbers may not add to 1097 due to missing data. †Results are based on analyses in the 1097 patients undergoing dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE).

©2001 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. (Reprinted) JAMA, April 11, 2001—Vol 285, No. 14 1869

Downloaded from www.jama.com at Johns Hopkins University, on October 28, 2005 ␤-BLOCKER THERAPY INFLUENCE did and did not have a life-threatening diac index, 0.82). The cardiac index con- diac complications (FIGURE 1). A clini- cardiac complication. The associated nected with the Lee risk-index-alone cal risk score can be determined on the ␹2 ␹2 goodness of fit of the 7 statistic was 2.1 model was 0.71 (goodness of fit 6, 7.0; basis of the patient’s age and clinical (P=.95). After correction for overopti- P=.32) and improved to 0.87 by adding history. If this risk score is in the range mism the cardiac index was 0.72, still re- DSE results and information regarding of 0 to 2 points (83% of the patients flecting satisfactory performance. The ␤-blocker therapy. belonged to this category) and the multivariable model that combined clini- ␤-blockers are administered periopera- cal data with DSE results had consider- Risk Classification Model tively, the estimated cardiac complica- ably better discriminating power with a Based on the results described above, a tion rate is relatively low (Ͻ2%), irre- cardiac index of 0.87 (goodness of fit simple scheme was developed to esti- spective of the DSE result. The estimated ␹2 6=7.6,P=.27; optimism-corrected car- mate a patient’s risk of perioperative car- risk of cardiac complications is also low in patients with a risk score of 3 or more points without NWMAs, provided Table 4. Multivariable Models to Predict Perioperative Cardiac Death or Myocardial ␤ Infarction* -blockers will be applied. Patients with Odds Ratio a risk score of 3 or more and NWMAs Variables (95% Confidence Interval) ␹2 P Value were at a considerable cardiac risk Clinical Characteristics Only (Ͼ6%), despite ␤-blocker therapy. Prior cerebrovascular accident Yes 3.4 (1.6-7.3) 10.4 .001 COMMENT No 1.0 Consistent with other studies,14-17 our Perioperative ␤-blocker therapy† Yes 0.3 (0.1-0.7) analysis of 1351 patients undergoing 6.9 .009 No 1.0 high-risk noncardiac vascular surgery Congestive heart failure demonstrated that advanced age, cur- Yes 3.0 (1.3-6.9) rent or prior angina, and a history of 6.8 .009 No 1.0 cardiac or cerebral events are the most Prior myocardial infarction important clinical determinants of peri- Yes 2.5 (1.2-5.3) 6.2 .01 operative cardiac death or MI. Apart No 1.0 from clinical data, DSE results were Current stable angina or prior angina Yes 2.1 (1.1-4.3) highly predictive of adverse cardiac out- 4.7 .03 No 1.0 come, which also confirms other inves- 1 ␤ Age, y tigations. Patients receiving -block- Ն70 1.9 (1.0-3.6) 4.0 .05 ers had significantly lower risk than Ͻ70 1.0 those not receiving them. It should be Combination of Clinical Characteristics emphasized that patients receiving and Results of Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography ␤-blockers had a considerably worse Segments with new wall-motion abnormalities, No. overall risk profile than those not receiv- Ն5 16.7 (6.0-47.0) 39.3 Ͻ.001 ing them, which makes this result even 1-4 13.9 (6.1-31.7) 28.5 Ͻ.001 more convincing. The additional and 0 1.0 additive prognostic value of DSE results Perioperative ␤-blocker therapy† Yes 0.1 (0.0-0.3) and ␤-blocker therapy was confirmed 22.7 Ͻ.001 No 1.0 in the analysis that applied the previ- Abnormal segments at rest, No. ously developed Lee risk index. On the Ն5 3.0 (1.5-6.3) 8.8 .003 basis of a risk score composed of a 0-4 1.0 weighted sum of the prognostic clini- Prior cerebrovascular accident cal characteristics, a large group (83%) Yes 3.2 (1.4-731) 7.6 .001 No 1.0 of low-risk patients with a score of less Age, y than 3 could be defined. In this group, Ն70 1.9 (1.0-4.0) the estimated risk of cardiac complica- 3.3 .07 Ͻ70 1.0 tions is less than 1%, regardless of DSE Congestive heart failure results, as long as patients are receiv- Yes 2.3 (0.9-5.5) 3.1 .08 ing ␤-blockers. In the remaining No 1.0 patients, those without stress-induced *Multivariable models were constructed by backward deletion of the least significant characteristics while applying the Akaike information criterion (see “Methods” section). ischemia also had a low estimated car- †␤-Blocker therapy includes long-term users and patients randomized to bisoprolol as part of the Dutch Echocardio- diac risk in the presence of periopera- graphic Cardiac Risk Evaluation Applying Stress Echocardiography (DECREASE) study. tive ␤-blocker therapy.

1870 JAMA, April 11, 2001—Vol 285, No. 14 (Reprinted) ©2001 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Downloaded from www.jama.com at Johns Hopkins University, on October 28, 2005 ␤-BLOCKER THERAPY INFLUENCE

Univariable analyses showed that pa- Table 5. Model for the Prediction of Cardiac Death or Myocardial Infarction tients with diabetes mellitus, pulmo- by the Lee Risk Index, Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography Results, nary disease, prior ventricular arrhyth- and Perioperative ␤-Blocker Therapy mias, or aortic valvular stenosis are at Odds Ratio increased risk of surgical complica- Variables (95% Confidence Interval) ␹2 P Value tions. However, in contrast to earlier Segments with new wall-motion 16,21 abnormalities, No. studies, these factors were not in- Ն5 11.6 (4.4-30.5) 24.8 Ͻ.001 dependent predictors in our multivari- 1-4 6.7 (3.1-14.5) 23.1 Ͻ.001 able analyses. This finding can be re- 0 1.0 flect a changing patient population or Perioperative ␤-blocker therapy* improved perioperative management al- Yes 0.2 (0.1-0.6) 10.4 .001 though it may also be a matter of (lack No 1.0 of) power. Additionally, it should be Abnormal segments at rest, No. emphasized that cardiac death or MI Ն5 2.7 (1.3-5.5) 7.1 .008 during complex surgery is most likely 0-4 1.0 to occur in patients with stress- Lee risk index† 1-Point increase 1.6 (1.1-2.2) 6.5 .01 inducible cardiac ischemia. Indeed, the *␤-Blocker therapy includes long-term users and patients randomized to bisoprolol as part of the Dutch Echocardio- occurrence of NWMAs during DSE was graphic Cardiac Risk Evaluation Applying Stress Echocardiography (DECREASE) study. †To compose the Lee risk index, 1 point is assigned to each of the following characteristics: high risk type of surgery, a major determinant of adverse out- known ischemic heart disease, a history of congestive heart failure, a history of cerebrovascular disease, diabetes come. Because a stress-induced ische- mellitus, and renal failure.

Figure 1. Estimate of the Perioperative Risk of Cardiac Death or Myocardial Infarction

Determine Risk Score Assign 1 Point for Each of the Following Characteristics: Age ≥70 Years, Current Angina, Prior Myocardial Infarction, Congestive Heart Failure, Prior Cerebrovascular Event, Diabetes Mellitus, and Renal Failure

Perform Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography (DSE)

DSE Results Not Considered No New Wall-Motion Abnormalities New Wall-Motion Abnormalities 65 65 65

60 60 60

55 55 55 Non–β-Blocker User 50 β-Blocker User 50 50 45 45 45

40 40 40

35 35 35

30 30 30

25 25 25

20 20 20

Estimated Cardiac Event Rate, % Estimated Cardiac 15 15 15

10 10 10

5 5 5

0 0 0 01234≥5 01234≥5 01234≥5 Risk Score Risk Score Risk Score Estimated Cardiac Event Rate (95% Confidence Intervals) Non–β-Blocker 1.0 2.2 4.5 9.2 18 32 0.8 1.4 2.3 3.7 6.1 9.8 11 18 26 38 50 63 Users (0.6-1.9) (1.4-3.3) (3.2-6.3) (6.5-13) (12-26) (19-47) (0.4-1.7) (0.8-2.5) (1.3-3.8) (2.1-6.5) (3.1-12) (4.3-21) (5.4-23) (10-29) (17-38) (26-50) (35-65) (43-79)

β-Blocker 0.4 0.8 1.6 3.4 7.0 14 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.7 1.2 1.5 2.4 4.0 6.5 10 16 Users (0.1-0.9) (0.3-1.7) (0.8-3.3) (1.7-6.7) (3.4-14) (6.5-27) (0.0-0.3) (0.1-0.5) (0.1-0.7) (0.2-1.2) (0.3-2.1) (0.4-3.9) (0.5-3.9) (1.0-5.5) (1.9-8.1) (3.3-13) (5.1-20) (7.4-32)

Results are based on clinical characteristics and results of DSE in patients who received ␤-blockers and those who did not receive ␤-blockers. Results reflect predictions based on logistic regression analyses.

©2001 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. (Reprinted) JAMA, April 11, 2001—Vol 285, No. 14 1871

Downloaded from www.jama.com at Johns Hopkins University, on October 28, 2005 ␤-BLOCKER THERAPY INFLUENCE

in the specific subgroups, patients with Figure 2. Perioperative Cardiac Risk of Death or Myocardial Infarction as Observed in Subpopulations NWMAs in 1 to 4 segments were prop- erly protected by ␤-blockers. In pa-

Determine Risk Score tients with more extensive ischemia, Assign 1 Point for Each of the Following Characteristics: Age ≥70 Years, however, ␤-blockers failed to reduce the Current Angina, Prior Myocardial Infarction, Congestive Heart Failure, rate of perioperative cardiac complica- Prior Cerebrovascular Event, Diabetes Mellitus, and Renal Failure Non–β-Blocker User β-Blocker User tions. Cardiac catheterization and sub- sequent myocardial revascularization should be considered in these patients. The prescription of ␤-blockers may ≥ Score = 0 (28%) 0 < Score <3 (55%) Score 3 (17%) delay surgery; so far, no study has indi- cated what the optimal run-in period Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography (DSE) of this drug is in this setting. There- fore, it can be questioned whether such

No New Wall-Motion New Wall-Motion New Wall-Motion therapy is really necessary in patients Abnormalities Abnormalities in Abnormalities in at very low risk. In the group of patients (11%) 1-4 Segments (4%) ≥5 Segments (2%) with a risk score of 0 points, 1.2% peri- 36 operative complications were observed 10 10 10 33 33 30 30 in those without ␤-blocker therapy (Fig-

5.8 ure 2). This complication rate seems suf- 5 5 5 5 5 ficiently low to refrain from adminis- 3.0 2.8 2.0 tering medication indeed and opt for 1.2 0.9 0 surgery without delay. Another issue is 0 0 0 0 0 ␤ Cardiac Complications, % Cardiac 4/327 0/48 16/528 2/215 6/103 1/50 6/18 1/36 5/15 4/11 that -blocker therapy may be contra- indicated, especially in patients with Results are according to the clinical risk score, dobutamine stress echocardiography, and receipt of ␤-blockers reactive airway diseases, such as severe during surgery. Percentages in parentheses represent the number of patients in the target category as a pro- portion of the total number of 1351 patients. Numbers underneath the bars represent the actual number of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmo- events/patients in the specific category. nary disease with a reactive compo- nent. It should be noticed that these patients are rare: there were no such mia was not more common in patients rate was low (Ն1%) in patients with a cases in our data set. Still, if ␤-blocker with diabetes mellitus, pulmonary dis- clinical risk score of less than 3 points therapy is contraindicated, the use of ease, prior ventricular arrhythmias, or and who were receiving ␤-blockers. It calcium antagonists with a negative aortic stenosis (78 NWMAs of 352 cases seems therefore appropriate to omit DSE chronotropic effect may be consid- [22%]) than in patients without such (and other noninvasive cardiac test- ered. The recent Incomplete Infarc- characteristic (144 NWMAs of 745 ing) in this large (Ͼ80%) group of pa- tion Trial of European Research Col- cases [19%]; P=.28), these character- tients and to proceed expeditiously with laborators Evaluating Prognosis post- istics are likely not strong determi- surgery under protection by ␤-blocker Thrombolysis (INTERCEPT) study of nants of a predisposition to ischemia. therapy. Dobutamine stress echocardi- post-MI patients reported fewer car- In contrast, patients with prior MI, prior ography is useful to further risk- diac events in patients randomized to heart failure, or prior CVA were more stratify patients with a clinical risk score such a drug compared with placebo.22 likely to have stress-induced ischemia of 3 or more points. If protected by peri- than other patients (150 NWMAs of operative ␤-blockade, patients without Study Limitations 545 cases [28%] vs 72 NWMAs of 552 stress-induced ischemia still had a low Because of its retrospective nature, our cases [13%]; PϽ.001). Still, factors such complication rate (2%) and are also can- analysis has limitations, which should as diabetes mellitus, may be predic- didates for prompt surgery. Patients with be considered when interpreting the re- tive of long-term complications. Dia- a risk score of 3 or more points and sults. The risk-stratification and modi- betes mellitus (and renal failure) were NWMAs (approximately 6% of the fication scheme using a clinical risk therefore still incorporated in the clini- population) had a considerable compli- score, DSE, and ␤-blocker therapy was cal risk index (Figure 1). cation rate despite the ␤-blocker therapy. developed after events had occurred. Our data suggest that the proposed treat- Furthermore, only some patients (those Clinical Implications ment policy in these patients may de- participating in the DECREASE study) FIGURE 2 may help to understand how pend on the extent of stress-induced is- were randomized to receive either peri- results can be translated into clinical chemia. Although the numbers of operative ␤-blockers or standard care. practice. The perioperative cardiac event patients and events are relatively small Patient characteristics may have played

1872 JAMA, April 11, 2001—Vol 285, No. 14 (Reprinted) ©2001 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Downloaded from www.jama.com at Johns Hopkins University, on October 28, 2005 ␤-BLOCKER THERAPY INFLUENCE an important role in the decision to ad- ing were university hospi- ers and those in whom cardiac revascu- minister ␤-blockers to patients who did tals) and that cardiac event rates might larization should be considered. not participate in the DECREASE study differ in other centers. and could potentially bias the results. Author Affiliations: University Hospital Rotterdam, Conclusions Rotterdam (Drs Boersma, Poldermans, Steyerberg, Importantly, we found no difference in van de Ven, van Urk, and Roelandt), the University the cardioprotective effect of ␤-block- Dobutamine stress echocardiography ef- Hospital Leiden, Leiden (Dr Bax), and University ers between patients who were random- fectively identifies patients at risk for Hospital Utrecht, Utrecht (Dr Banga), the Nether- lands; and University of Manitoba, Winnipeg (Dr ized within the framework of the perioperative cardiac events. Besides, our Thomson). DECREASE study and those whose re- data showed that the additional predic- Corresponding Author and Reprints: Don Polder- ␤ mans, MD, PhD, University Hospital Rotterdam, De- ceipt of -blockers was chronic. This tive value of DSE is limited in clinically partment of Surgery, Room H921, Dr Molewater- suggests that the utility of periopera- low-risk patients receiving ␤-blockers. plein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, the Netherlands (e-mail: ␤ [email protected]). tive -adrenergic blockade extends This observation may have important Author Contributions: Study concept and design: beyond the small subset of high-risk clinical implications: in a majority of pa- Boersma, Poldermans, Roelandt. patients who participated in the tients, additional testing by DSE can be Acquisition of data: Boersma, Poldermans. Analysis and interpretation of data: Boersma, Polder- DECREASE study. Finally, the ob- avoided and patients can proceed safely mans, Bax, Steyerberg, Thomson, Banga, van de Ven, served event rates were relatively low for surgery without delay. In a smaller van Urk. Drafting of the manuscript: Boersma, Poldermans. compared with previous investiga- group of clinically intermediate- and Critical revision of the manuscript for important in- tions. It should be appreciated that our high-risk patients, DSE may help to iden- tellectual content: Bax, Thomson, Banga, van de Ven, van Urk, Roelandt. results were obtained in selected, high- tify patients in whom surgery can still Statistical expertise: Boersma, Steyerberg. volume hospitals (3 of the participat- be performed while receiving ␤-block- Study supervision: Roelandt.

REFERENCES 1. Poldermans D, Fioretti PM, Forster T, et al. Dobu- 8. Poldermans D, Boersma E, Bax JJ, et al. The effect perioperative cardiovascular evaluation for noncar- tamine stress echocardiography for assessment of peri- of bisoprolol on perioperative mortality and myocar- diac surgery: Report of the American College of operative cardiac risk in patients undergoing major vas- dial infarction in high-risk patients undergoing vas- /American Heart Association Task Force cular surgery. Circulation. 1993;87:1506-1512. cular surgery. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1789-1794. on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 1996;93:1278- 2. Poldermans D, Arnese M, Fioretti PM, et al. Im- 9. Lee TH. Reducing risk in noncardiac surgery. N Engl 1317. proved cardiac risk stratification in major vascular sur- J Med. 1999;341:1838-1840. 16. L’Italien GJ, Paul SD, Hendel RC, et al. Develop- gery with dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiog- 10. Mayet C, Wolfe J, Foale R. Cardiac risk stratifi- ment and validation of a Bayesian model for periop- raphy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;26:648-653. cation [letter]. Lancet. 2000;355:500. erative cardiac risk assessment in a cohort of 1,081 3. Pellikka PA, Roger VL, Oh JK, Seward JB, Tajik AJ. 11. McNeill AJ, Fioretti PM, el-Said SM, Salustri A, For- vascular surgical candidates. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996; Safety of performing dobutamine stress echocardiog- ster T, Roelandt JR. Enhanced sensitivity for detec- 27:779-786. raphy in patients with abdominal aortic Ͼ tion of coronary artery disease by addition of atro- 17. Lee TH, Marcantonio ER, Mangione CM, et al. or=4 cm in diameter. Am J Cardiol. 1996;77:413-416. pine to dobutamine stress echocardiography. Am Derivation and prospective validation of a simple in- 4. Davila-Roman VG, Waggoner AD, Sicard GA, Gelt- J Cardiol. 1992;70:41-46. dex for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac man EM, Schechtman KB, Perez JE. Dobutamine stress 12. Akaike H. Information theory as an extension of surgery. Circulation. 1999;100:1043-1049. echocardiography predicts surgical outcome in pa- the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov BN, Csaki 18. Kendal DG. Rank Correlation Methods. Lon- tients with an and peripheral vascu- F, eds. Second International Symposium on Informa- don, England: Charles Griffin; 1962. lar disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;21:957-963. tion Theory. Budapest, Hungary: Akademia Kiado; 19. Gong G. Cross-validation, the jackknife, and the 5. Poldermans D, Bax JJ, Thomson IR, et al. Role of 1973:267-281. bootstrap: excess error estimation in forward logistic dobutamine stress echocardiography for preopera- 13. Boersma E, Pieper KS, Steyerberg EW, et al. Pre- regression. J Am Stat Assoc. 1986;81:108-113. tive cardiac risk assessment before major vascular sur- dictors of outcome in patients with acute coronary syn- 20. Van Houwelingen JC, Le Cessie S. Predictive value gery. Echocardiography. 2000;17:79-91. dromes without persistent ST-segment elevation: re- of statistical models. Stat Med. 1990;9:1303-1325. 6. Lalka SG, Sawada SG, Dalsing MC, et al. Dobuta- sults from an international trial of 9461 patients. 21. Mangano DT. Perioperative cardiac morbidity. An- mine stress echocardiography as a predictor of car- Circulation. 2000;101:2557-2567. esthesiology. 1990;72:153-184. diac events associated with aortic surgery. J Vasc Surg. 14. Mangano DT, Goldman L. Preoperative assess- 22. Boden WE, van Gilst WH, Scheldewaert RG, et al, 1992;15:831-840. ment of patients with known or suspected coronary for the Incomplete Infarction Trial of European Research 7. Langan EM, Youkey JR, Franklin DP, Elmore JR, Cos- disease. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1750-1756. Collaborators Evaluating Prognosis post-Thrombolysis tello JM, Nassef LA. Dobutamine stress echocardiog- 15. Eagle KA, Brundage BH, Chaitman BR, et al, for (INTERCEPT). Diltiazem in acute myocardial infarction raphy for cardiac risk assessment before aortic sur- the Committee on Perioperative Cardiovascular treated with thrombolytic agents: a randomised placebo- gery. J Vasc Surg. 1993;18:905-911. Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery. Guidelines for controlled trial. Lancet. 2000;355:1751-1756.

©2001 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. (Reprinted) JAMA, April 11, 2001—Vol 285, No. 14 1873

Downloaded from www.jama.com at Johns Hopkins University, on October 28, 2005