Rodin – Sugimoto
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Impressionist & Modern
Impressionist & Modern Art New Bond Street, London I 10 October 2019 Lot 8 Lot 2 Lot 26 (detail) Impressionist & Modern Art New Bond Street, London I Thursday 10 October 2019, 5pm BONHAMS ENQUIRIES PHYSICAL CONDITION IMPORTANT INFORMATION 101 New Bond Street London OF LOTS IN THIS AUCTION The United States Government London W1S 1SR India Phillips PLEASE NOTE THAT THERE IS NO has banned the import of ivory bonhams.com Global Head of Department REFERENCE IN THIS CATALOGUE into the USA. Lots containing +44 (0) 20 7468 8328 TO THE PHYSICAL CONDITION OF ivory are indicated by the VIEWING [email protected] ANY LOT. INTENDING BIDDERS symbol Ф printed beside the Friday 4 October 10am – 5pm MUST SATISFY THEMSELVES AS lot number in this catalogue. Saturday 5 October 11am - 4pm Hannah Foster TO THE CONDITION OF ANY LOT Sunday 6 October 11am - 4pm Head of Department AS SPECIFIED IN CLAUSE 14 PRESS ENQUIRIES Monday 7 October 10am - 5pm +44 (0) 20 7468 5814 OF THE NOTICE TO BIDDERS [email protected] Tuesday 8 October 10am - 5pm [email protected] CONTAINED AT THE END OF THIS Wednesday 9 October 10am - 5pm CATALOGUE. CUSTOMER SERVICES Thursday 10 October 10am - 3pm Ruth Woodbridge Monday to Friday Specialist As a courtesy to intending bidders, 8.30am to 6pm SALE NUMBER +44 (0) 20 7468 5816 Bonhams will provide a written +44 (0) 20 7447 7447 25445 [email protected] Indication of the physical condition of +44 (0) 20 7447 7401 Fax lots in this sale if a request is received CATALOGUE Julia Ryff up to 24 hours before the auction Please see back of catalogue £22.00 Specialist starts. -
Monumental Thinker2
Auguste RODIN 1840 - 1917 “Le Grand Penseur” “The Monumental Thinker” Bronze sculpture - 1880 Signed on the base A. RODIN From the edition of twenty five numbered 1/25 to 25/25 Cast in 1998* at the VALSUANI FOUNDRY - Paris 180 centimeters in height – 71 inches 1,440 pounds Valsuani Foundry mark Stamped 1998 and 21/25 Certification & Authorization by The Rodin Museum – Paris 1998 * Most examples of the first edition of approximately 24 bronzes were also cast posthumously, ending in 1968. Two thirds of the first edition were cast after Rodin’s death. 1 Presentation – History of the Work First conceived as the central and crowning figure of the “Gates of Hell” 1880, a monumental group of sculptures commissioned by the French government, Rodin’s impressive composition, “The Thinker” has become as an independant work, indubitably one of the most well-known and celebrated sculpture of all times. The first exhibited version in 1888 in Copenhagen, was in plaster and 71.5 cm high. Only in 1902, when some of Rodin most popular sculptures were enlarged with the help of his collaborator Henri LeBossé, a monumental version of the 'Thinker' was created. By the end of 1903 Rodin had completed the enlargement of the Thinker. This impressive plaster cast of the Great Thinker, or Monumental Thinker (More than 6 feet high and 1,400 pounds of Bronze....) was first exhibited in London in 1904. A bronze made after this plaster was exhibited in Paris that same year. On April 21 st 1906, funds were collected through public subsciption and this bronze cast in 1904 was erected in front of the Pantheon in Paris. -
Bodies of Knowledge: the Presentation of Personified Figures in Engraved Allegorical Series Produced in the Netherlands, 1548-1600
University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2015 Bodies of Knowledge: The Presentation of Personified Figures in Engraved Allegorical Series Produced in the Netherlands, 1548-1600 Geoffrey Shamos University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Recommended Citation Shamos, Geoffrey, "Bodies of Knowledge: The Presentation of Personified Figures in Engraved Allegorical Series Produced in the Netherlands, 1548-1600" (2015). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 1128. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/1128 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/1128 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Bodies of Knowledge: The Presentation of Personified Figures in Engraved Allegorical Series Produced in the Netherlands, 1548-1600 Abstract During the second half of the sixteenth century, engraved series of allegorical subjects featuring personified figures flourished for several decades in the Low Countries before falling into disfavor. Designed by the Netherlandsâ?? leading artists and cut by professional engravers, such series were collected primarily by the urban intelligentsia, who appreciated the use of personification for the representation of immaterial concepts and for the transmission of knowledge, both in prints and in public spectacles. The pairing of embodied forms and serial format was particularly well suited to the portrayal of abstract themes with multiple components, such as the Four Elements, Four Seasons, Seven Planets, Five Senses, or Seven Virtues and Seven Vices. While many of the themes had existed prior to their adoption in Netherlandish graphics, their pictorial rendering had rarely been so pervasive or systematic. -
Heaven and Hell.Pmd
50 Copyright © 2002 The Center for Christian Ethics at Baylor University This photo is available in the print version of Heaven and Hell. Though Auguste Rodin struggled over twenty years to express through sculpture the desperation of souls that are falling from Grace, he never finished his magnificent obsession. Auguste Rodin (1840-1917), THE GATES OF HELL, 1880-1900, Bronze, 250-3/4 x 158 x 33-3/8 in. Posthumous cast authorized by Musée Rodin, 1981. Iris & B. Gerald Cantor Center for Visual Arts at Stanford University; gift of the B. Gerald Cantor Collection. Photograph by Frank Wing. The Final Judgment in Christian Art 51 Falling BY HEIDI J. HORNIK uguste Rodin accepted his first major commission, The Gates of Hell, when he was forty years old. This sculpture was to be the door- Away for the École des Arts Dècoratifs in Paris. Though the muse- um of decorative arts was not built, Rodin struggled over twenty years to depict the damned as they approach the entrance into hell. He never finished. The sculpture was cast in bronze after the artist’s death, using plaster casts taken from his clay models. The Gates of Hell, like Michelangelo’s Last Judgment, lays out its mean- ing through a turbulent and multi-figured design. The identities of many figures in the composition are not immediately apparent. Instead Rodin challenges us to make sense of the whole work by dissecting its elements and recalling its artistic influences.† The Three Shades at the very top, for example, derives from Greek thought about Hades. -
Rodin and Michelangelo: Nature and Tradition Claire Christian Black
Rodin and Michelangelo: Nature and Tradition Claire Christian Black In the summer of 1875 Florence celebrated the 400th an- sented the conventional limitations of sculpture that seemed niversary of Michelangelo’s birth, and, in February 1876, imposed naturally by its materials. He wrote that, “one can paint Auguste Rodin visited Italy and encountered Michelangelo’s whatever one wants; sculpture—severe, grave, chaste—must sculpture in situ for the first time. In the eyes of Rodin’s con- choose.”2 Diderot also accepted the requirement that sculpture temporary critics and biographers, Michelangelo reached out present a high degree of organization and surface finish to the to Rodin at that moment, illuminating a new path for him, and viewer that complemented the gravity of its subject matter. Ironi- for modern sculpture. Most recently, Rodin and Michelangelo: cally, he used Michelangelo’s unfinished works to bolster his A Study in Artistic Inspiration, at the Philadelphia Museum of argument, when he wrote: Art, rekindled interest in Michelangelo’s impact on Rodin and, . .a slight imperfection in drawing that’s by extension, his successors.1 This convention of associating scarcely noticeable in a painting is unforgiv- the two artists started at the beginning of Rodin’s public suc- able in a statue. Michelangelo knew this well; cess and is of such long-standing that it possesses the qualities when he despaired of achieving flawless per- of historical fact. The relationship can be documented in the fection he preferred to leave the marble literature and its effect verified through the study of Rodin’s rough-hewn.3 own work. -
Tangents 1 Publishing Notes Letter from the Editors
summer 2006 the journal of the master of liberal arts program at stanford university in this issue... Essays by Jennifer Swanton Brown, Jennifer Burton, John Devine, Nancy Krajewski, Denise Osborne, Loren Szper, and Bryon Williams Fiction by Andy Grose Poems by Jennifer Swanton Brown, Tamara Tinker, and Mason Tobak summer 2006 the journal of the master of liberal arts program at stanford university volume 5 in this issue... 4 The Silk Horse Andy Grose 10 A Flood of Misborrowing: Sin and Deluge in Atrahasis and Genesis Bryon Williams 17 Three Poems of Love-Gone-Bad Mason Tobak 20 William James Observes San Francisco’s Reliance John Devine 27 The Burghers of Calais: A Personal Viewing Experience Jennifer Burton 31 Dionysus at Sea Tamara Tinker 32 Marriage in The Odyssey: An Intimate Conversation Jennifer Swanton Brown 34 A Deadly Agent of Change: The 1832 Parisian Cholera Epidemic and the French Public Health Movement Loren Szper 39 On the Path to the Pond Jennifer Swanton Brown 40 Kierkegaard in Wyoming: Reflections on Faith and Freedom in the High Mountains Nancy Krajewski 44 Do Laws Govern the Evolution of Technology? Denise Osborne 48 Contributors tangents 1 Publishing Notes letter from the editors This is a publication featuring the w ork of students and We are proud to present this issue of Tangents, the journal of the Stanfor d Master alumni of the Master of Liberal Arts Program at of Liberal Arts Program. For the fifth edition we ha ve chosen a diverse gr oup of Stanford University. works by students and alumni, including: Editor Oscar Firschein A story about two brothers and a powerful horse Assistant Editor Three quite varied poems Lindi Press Reviewers To celebrate the centenary, William James’s observations about the Oscar Firschein San Francisco earthquake Mary MacKinnen Lindi Press Some thoughts about marriage in The Odyssey Faculty Advisor A discussion of the 1832 Parisian Cholera epidemic Dr. -
David Getsy Rodin
ROD IN Sex and the Making of MODERN SCULPTURE David J. Getsy YALE UNIVERSITY PRESS New Haven and London Copyright © 2010 by David J. Getsy CONTENTS All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law and except by reviewers for the public press), without written permission from the publishers. Permission to quote from Eric Gill’s papers courtesy of the William Andrews Clark Memorial Library, University of California Los Angeles, and the Bridgeman Art Library Designed by Gillian Malpass Acknowledgments vii Printed in Singapore Introduction 1 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS C ATALOGING -IN -P UBLICATION DATA Rodin : sex and the making of modern sculpture / David Getsy. p. cm. 1876 Includes bibliographical references and index. Michelangelo and Rodin’s Desires 29 ISBN 978-0-300-16725-2 (cl : alk. paper) 1. Rodin, Auguste, 1840 –1917 –Criticism and interpretation. 2. Sex in art. 3. Sculpture, modern –Technique. I. Title. 1900 NB 553. R7G 48 2010 Material Evidence, the Gates of Hell , and 730.92 –dc 22 the Making of Rodin 59 2010021334 Conclusion 173 Page i Unknown photographer, Auguste Rodin , c. 1890–1900 . Photograph, 15.7 × 20.3 cm. René Huyghe Archive, Department of Image Collections, Notes 194 National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C. Image courtesy Board of Trustees, National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C. Bibliography 221 Frontispiece Unknown photographer, Auguste Rodin posing with “The Kiss” in Marble, c. 1898 . Albumen print, 11.5 × 11.6 cm. Iris & B. -
The Demon Haunted World
THE DEMON- HAUNTED WORLD Science as a Candle in the Dark CARL SAGAN BALLANTINE BOOKS • NEW YORK Preface MY TEACHERS It was a blustery fall day in 1939. In the streets outside the apartment building, fallen leaves were swirling in little whirlwinds, each with a life of its own. It was good to be inside and warm and safe, with my mother preparing dinner in the next room. In our apartment there were no older kids who picked on you for no reason. Just the week be- fore, I had been in a fight—I can't remember, after all these years, who it was with; maybe it was Snoony Agata from the third floor— and, after a wild swing, I found I had put my fist through the plate glass window of Schechter's drug store. Mr. Schechter was solicitous: "It's all right, I'm insured," he said as he put some unbelievably painful antiseptic on my wrist. My mother took me to the doctor whose office was on the ground floor of our building. With a pair of tweezers, he pulled out a fragment of glass. Using needle and thread, he sewed two stitches. "Two stitches!" my father had repeated later that night. He knew about stitches, because he was a cutter in the garment industry; his job was to use a very scary power saw to cut out patterns—backs, say, or sleeves for ladies' coats and suits—from an enormous stack of cloth. Then the patterns were conveyed to endless rows of women sitting at sewing machines. -
The Materiality and Mythology of Rodin's Touch
Auguste Rodin has been understood by Unlike much earlier sculpture, one needed many to have inaugurated modern sculp- no story or explanation to understand the DAVID J. GETSY ture, liberating it from its conventions and electricity of touching a body or being traditions. While the singularity of this rep- touched. Rodin’s contribution to modern utation could be contested, his work has sculpture was to bring attention to the often overshadowed his competitors and material object as the product of the sculp- alternatives among the divergent routes tor’s hands, and he amplified that attention into and out of modern sculpture across by sculpting naked bodies that seemed to The Materiality and Europe. Across the twentieth century, his convulse in space as the result of those originating status was often assumed, and hands. With Rodin’s work, the sculptor’s Mythology of Rodin’s Touch he became the sculptor against whom oth- touch in the clay was often taken for the ers were gauged in the modern sculpture’s lover’s touching of the nude — despite the early development. That reputation has missing limbs, contortions, or imprints of persisted, and he remains one of the most fingers and hands on Rodin’s sculptural recognizable of modern artists globally bodies. Under his hand, sculpture was because of his way of making sculpture. seen to have become more sensual, and Then and now, his works have appeared the evidence of his manipulations of mat- direct and expressive, with dramatic ter reinforced the frankness that viewers gouges, marks, and finger impressions perceived in the unclothed bodies writhing littering his surfaces. -
RODIN: TRUTH, FORM, LIFE Selections from the Iris and B
Fairfield University DigitalCommons@Fairfield RODIN: TRUTH, FORM, LIFE: Selections from the Iris and B. Gerald Cantor Collections - RODIN: TRUTH, FORM, LIFE: Selections from Ephemera the Iris and B. Gerald Cantor Collections Spring 2020 RODIN: TRUTH, FORM, LIFE Selections from the Iris and B. Gerald Cantor Collections Wall Labels Fairfield University Art Museum Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fairfield.edu/rodin-cantor-ephemera This item has been accepted for inclusion in DigitalCommons@Fairfield by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Fairfield. It is brought to you by DigitalCommons@Fairfield with permission from the rights- holder(s) and is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses, you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. For more information, please contact [email protected]. When Rodin sat for this photograph in ca. 1880, he was about 40 years old and about to begin work on The Gates of Hell and The Burghers of Calais. Rodin in his studio in Meudon, about 1902. A study for the Monument to Balzac is on the right in the photo. Rodin’s studio at Meudon about 1900, with the plaster version of The Gates of Hell. Balzac in Dominican Robe Modeled 1893, cast 1981 Georges Rudier Foundry (published by Musée Rodin, edition of 12, numbered 9/12) Bronze Lent by Iris Cantor In this sculpture, Rodin elongates Balzac’s fgure and also introduces some indications of his life and career in the monk’s robe (his preferred apparel when writing), and the pile of books and papers at his feet. -
Rodin's Performative Mark-Making
77. 1900 /3 does not refute iconographic or contextual readings. Instead, it makes a conceptual ground for Rodin's making of modern sculpture. All three case for how this work could support so many. For Rodin, the content of strategies came together visibly and dramatically in Rodin's exhibition of the work was, ultimately, his own role as its maker. This is not to say that the Gates in 1900, and all three came to redefine the practice and persona 91 the work is autobiographical, though such implications of this and other of the modern sculptor. This persona, in turn, became closely linked to coded symbolic programs have been made. 19 Rather, this perpetually the context of sexuality that surrounded Rodin's practice in the public unfinished project was the pivot around which turned Rodin's decades imagination, supported by and giving new meaning to these tactics. long cultivation of his role as the prototypical modern sculptor. In what follows, I shall discuss three interrelated strategies that Rodin Rodin's Peliormative Mark-Making developed in and through his work on the Gates as a means to stage a par ticular view of sculptural practice and to direct the attention back to his Mid-nineteenth century discourses of sculpture in which Rodin emerged own acts of making: (I) his emphatic marking of his works with supposed had a highly vexed attitude toward sculpture's materiality.20 The term traces of his process and manipulation, (2) his deployment of the replica "materiality" refers to the constitution of the sculptural object by and as tory and recombinatory potential of plaster casting in developing the fig actual matter - stone, metal, wax, plaster, ivory, wood, and so on. -
The Intersection Between Nationalism and Religion in The
ABSTRACT Title of Document: The Intersection Between Nationalism and Religion: The Burghers of Calais of Auguste Rodin in the French Third Republic Jung-Sil Lee, Doctor of Philosophy, 2009 Directed By: Professor June Hargrove, Department of Art History and Archaeology As a republican, Auguste Rodin (1840-1917) conveyed political ideology in his public sculpture, but due to his interest in religion and spirituality, his interpretations differed from contemporary artists. He grafted national myths and symbols onto Catholicism and its rituals to facilitate the sacralization of the Republic. Yet, the tension between Catholicism and republicanism in his work persisted because of his religiosity and his adherence to secularism. Rodin’s conflict and compromise between the two fields were not only his personal dilemma, but also that of the Third Republic. This dissertation focuses on how Rodin internalized republican ideology in his public sculpture, and how he appropriated Catholic ritual to promote political messages. In spite of the republican government’s constant struggle to separate from Catholic domination, Catholicism was so deeply imbedded in French culture, Rodin recognized this complex paradigm which he co-opted to construct an ideological matrix for his public work. Aware of the powerful social role of religion, the First Republic tried to create a new religion based on deistic tradition, The Cult of Supreme Being, to unite all French people who were severely divided by factions, languages, and regionalism. This precedent tradition further proved the importance of religion’s social reach in constructing national sentiment. Based on research in Rodin museums in Paris and Meudon in 2004 and 2007, this study examines how Rodin merged Catholic practices and contemporary social ideologies into the fiber of nationalist identity that served to reconcile political oppositions in France and to heal wounded civic pride after the French defeat in the Franco-Prussian War.